Abstract
Inflammasomes are a group of protein complex located in cytoplasm and assemble in response to a wide variety of pathogen‐associated molecule patterns, damage‐associated molecule patterns, and cellular stress. Generally, the activation of inflammasomes will lead to maturation of proinflammatory cytokines and pyroptotic cell death, both associated with inflammatory cascade amplification. A sensor protein, an adaptor, and a procaspase protein interact through their functional domains and compose one subunit of inflammasome complex. Under physiological conditions, inflammasome functions against pathogen infection and endogenous dangers including mtROS, mtDNA, and so on, while dysregulation of its activation can lead to unwanted results. In recent years, advances have been made to clarify the mechanisms of inflammasome activation, the structural details of them and their functions (negative/positive) in multiple disease models in both animal models and human. The wide range of the stimuli makes the function of inflammasome diverse and complex. Here, we review the structure, biological functions, and therapeutic targets of inflammasomes, while highlight NLRP3, NLRC4, and AIM2 inflammasomes, which are the most well studied. In conclusion, this review focuses on the activation process, biological functions, and structure of the most well‐studied inflammasomes, summarizing and predicting approaches for disease treatment and prevention with inflammasome as a target. We aim to provide fresh insight into new solutions to the challenges in this field.
Keywords: AIM2, function, inflammasome, NLRC4, NLRP3, structure, therapy
Here, we reviewed the activation process and basic structure of inflammasomes in both inactive and active states. Biological functions of inflammasomes in this review focus on the release of proinflammatory cytokines and the activation of gasdermins, as well as its participation in multiple diseases. The complexity of its activation, structure, and functions provide numerous targets for therapy in these diseases.

1. INTRODUCTION
Inflammasome is a protein complex that plays an important role in innate immunity and body's response to attacks from both pathogens and endogenous dangers signals. Inflammasome as a whole is composed of three functional components, the sensor, the adaptor and caspases downstream. The known pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) in innate immunity, the first line of defense in human immunity, include Toll like receptors (TLRs), RIG‐I like receptors (RLRs), AIM2 like receptors (ALRs), NOD like receptors (NLRs), and cyclic GMP‐AMP synthase (cGAS)/STING. NLRs family, which contains NLRP1, NLRP2, NLRP3, NLRP6, NLRC4, and NLRP12, can act as the sensor of inflammasome complex. ALRs family, which contains pyrin domain and HIN domain (PYHIN) and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), has also been elaborately discussed. Members of NLR family and the PYHIN family, which can sense a wide range of pathogen‐associated molecule patterns (PAMPs) and damage‐associated molecule patterns (DAMPs) breaching cytosol, also act as the sensor. When stimuli are sensed by these “sensors,” the latter can form cytoplasmic multiprotein complexes termed “inflammasomes” with apoptosis‐associated speck‐like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (CARD) (ASC), which is the adaptor working as bridge to connect the sensors and procaspases. When procaspases are activated and become the effector of inflammasome complex, they can act as scissors to cleave the precursors of gasdermins and proinflammatory cytokines. Maturation of pore‐forming protein gasdermins, which oligomerize to form pores in the membrane of cells or other organelles, 1 leading to the release of these cytokines and eventually the lytic cell death. The activation of inflammasomes under certain circumstances will not definitely lead to cell death, but rather some a hyperactive state of immune cells for continuous effects. 2 , 3 Dysregulation of inflammasome assembly has been proved to be involved in multiple diseases, from numerous infectious diseases 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 to chronic inflammatory diseases like cancers 8 , 9 , 10 and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 Nevertheless, inflammasome tends to play dual roles in human diseases, depending on the cell types and microenvironment of the organs.
In recent years, with the advances in technologies and further in‐depth researches of inflammasomes in more disease models, scientists have provided us with new evidence for more precise regulation of inflammasome functions and application value of targeting inflammasome in treatment regimens. Here, we first review the activation process of inflammasomes to provide an overview insight. Then, we introduce the progress in structure of inflammasomes and three‐dimensional structure of proteins. We also introduce their biological functions under both physical and pathological conditions, which leads us to the therapeutic potential of targeting inflammasomes in human diseases.
2. ACTIVATION OF INFLAMMASOMES
Now known inflammasomes include NLRP1, NLRP3, NLRC4, AIM2, NLRP6, NLRP10 inflammasomes, and so on. Though the mechanisms of different inflammasomes activation have not been fully articulated so far, in this review we summarize the current understanding of the activation mechanisms of NLRP3, AIM2, and NLRC4, which are the most well researched.
2.1. NLRP3
NLRP3 is a cytosolic protein that is composed of three domains, leucine‐rich repeat (LRR) at the C‐terminal, nucleotide‐binding, and oligomerization domain NATCH and pyrin domain (PYD) at the N‐terminal. 15 It is by far the most well‐characterized among other inflammasomes due to the fact that it can function in both innate and adaptive immune responses and acts as a bridge. The activation of NLRP3 inflammasome is a two‐step process, including a priming step and an activation step (Figure 1). As the constitutive expression level of NLRP3 is not sufficient for the activation and assembly of the inflammasome, cell can first recognize PAMPs or DAMPs with TLRs, NLRs, or other members of PRR family, resulting in the translational upregulation of Nlrp3 and IL‐1β through the activation of NF‐κB pathway. 16 , 17 Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) including phosphorylation and deubiquitination can also happen during this step. 18 , 19 The next is the activation step, which can be induced by a wide variety of molecule and cellular events including changes in ion gradients and mitochondrial dysfunction. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 For its being activated by extracellular danger signals, NLRP3 inflammasome can respond to host‐derived moieties, such as extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP), uric acid crystals, calcium phosphate dihydrate, cholesterol crystals, and glucose, 24 or the stimuli of whole pathogens, such as bacteria, 25 fungi, 26 and viruses. 27 It can also be activated by host‐derived molecules forming during the progression of the diseases. For instance, deposition of amyloid‐β peptide, a heterogeneous mixture of small peptides generated by sequential cleavage of amyloid precursor protein, is recognized as an important character of Alzheimer's disease (AD). It was demonstrated to function as an activator of NLRP3 inflammasome in microglia. 28 Accumulation of damaged, ROS‐generating mitochondria caused by autophagy/ mitophagy blockade can activate NLRP3 inflammasome as well. 23
FIGURE 1.

Overview of the formation and activation process of NLRP3 inflammasome. In the canonical pathway, the activation of NLRP3 is consisted of a priming and activation step. The priming step refers to the binding of PAMPs and DAMPs to PRRs and activation of NF‐κB pathway. The activation step and the assembly of NLRP3 inflammasome lead to the maturation of proinflammatory cytokines and cell pyroptosis. NLRP3 inflammasome can also be activated in noncanonical and alternative pathways.
There are three distinct ways of NLRP3 inflammasome activation (Figure 1). For the first pathway, after both the priming and activation steps, linear ASC ubiquitination with the linear ubiquitin assembly complex is indispensable for the following biological processes. 29 NLRP3 recruits and oligomerizes with ASC that acts as the adaptor between NLRP3 and procaspase‐1 through homologous recognition of their CARD domains. Then, it can recruit and process the inactive procaspase‐1. Mature caspase‐1 acts as a scissor, cleaving both the precursors of proinflammatory cytokines and gasdermin family proteins, converting them into biological active forms, and eventually leading to the release of the mature cytokines and cell pyroptosis. This whole process is referred to as canonical inflammasome pathway and it is caspase‐1 dependent. In addition to the activation pathway described above, caspase‐4/5/11‐dependent noncanonical NLRP3 activation was also reported in recent years. 30 , 31 Caspase‐4/5 in human or caspase‐11 in mice can detect and then bind with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) directly in both monocytes and nonmonocytes, leading to oligomerization and autoproteolysis of the proteins. 32 The subsequent membrane pore forming and changes in ion gradients lead to canonical NLRP3 inflammasome pathway, showing the interplay between these two pathways. 33 Apart from the exogenous LPS, self‐encoded oxidized phospholipid 1‐palmitoyl‐2‐arachidonoyl‐sn‐glycero‐3‐phosphorylcholine (oxPAPC) in dendritic cells (DCs) can elicit this activation pathway as well. 34 In a recent research, the nuclear orphan receptor Nur77 has been identified as a bridge between LPS and NLRP3 activation. It can bind with LPS with its C terminus directly, leading to its binding with NLRP3. It is worth noting that the binding between Nur77 and NLRP3 requires the existence of both LPS and double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA). This explains the mechanism how NLRP3 inflammasome is activated by caspase‐11 activation in response to LPS. 35 The last way of activation is referred to as alternative NLRP3 inflammasome activation pathway, and it depends on the TLR4–TRIF–RIPK1–FADD–CASP8 signaling pathway uncoupled with other inflammasome components. 36 In human monocytes, apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC3) was also shown to activate this caspase‐8‐dependent alternative NLRP3 inflammasome pathway through dimerization of TLR2 and TLR4. 37 , 38 In summary, different downstream caspases characterize different activation pathways of NLRP3 inflammasome and result in different processing methods toward the precursor of the inflammatory cytokines in macrophages and monocytes, indicate the differences in their functions. It is also worth noting that caspase‐8, the determinant of alternative activation pathway, showed both prodeath and prosurvival functions. And interactions among caspase‐8, caspase‐11, and RIPK3 navigate the cells to distinct fates, 39 which suggests a strategy of targeting different activation pathways for disease treatment.
What attracts great attention is the mechanism for NLRP3 to sense such a wide arrange of stimuli. Researchers have discovered that much of the stimuli can lead to a novel disassembly of trans‐Golgi network (TGN). 40 Through the ionic bonding between a region in NLRP3 and the negatively charged phosphatidylinositol 4‐phospahte (PI4P) on dTGN, NLRP3 is recruited, and utilizes dTGN as a scaffold for its aggregation. Though the precise mechanism of how these stimuli lead to the structure change of dTGN still remains to be solved, this breakthrough obviously provide insight into prevention and targeted therapy of NLRP3‐related diseases. Based on the recognition of the importance of vesicles containing PI4P in NLRP3 activation, following work in the biological characteristics of the vesicles to which NLRP3 is recruited demonstrated that they are of endosomal origin with bio‐markers include EEA1, RAB5, and SNX2. 41 Through the observation of early endosomes with transferrin loading, researchers also found that NLRP3 is recruited to early endosomes, which accumulate both PI4P and transferrin, then the recruited NLRP3 is activated and lead to the inflammatory cascades. Taken together, these results suggest Golgi apparatus as an ideal therapeutic target of NLRP3‐related diseases.
It seems that most of the stimuli for NLRP3 inflammasome activation function through potassium (K+) efflux. But the precise molecule mechanisms underlying are still a biological mystery remained to be resolved. Recent studies provided us with valuable insights. Never in mitosis A‐related kinase 7 (NEK7) has been recognized as an upstream signal of NLRP3 activation. 42 , 43 This activation mechanism is NLRP3–NEK7 specific, as it is not observed in NLRC4 or AIM2, nor in other members of the NIMA‐related kinases family.
2.2. AIM2
AIM2, which belongs to the IFI family, was found in researches searching for DNA sensors and acts as a cytoplasmic DNA sensor. 44 It was further demonstrated that the silence of Aim2 can inhibit the activation of caspases. Among the genes of the same function, AIM2 is the only one to be able to activate caspase‐1 when stably expressed in 293T‐caspase‐1‐ASC cell line, indicating the involvement of ASC as the adaptor. 45 Following researches suggested that AIM2 is a sensor protein that works in the similar way as NLRP3, recognizing dsDNA and oligomerizing to assemble with ASC and procaspase‐1 to form a multiprotein complex, ultimately leading to the release of mature proinflammatory cytokines and pyroptotic cell death. It was also suggested that in response to the infection of specific pathogens such as HSV and Francisella, AIM2 inflammasome assembly can lead to PANoptosis, which is characterized by the concomitant activation of pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis, as a protection mechanism for the host. 46
The dsDNA upstream of AIM2 activation can originate from bacterial infection, viral infection and self‐DNA distributed in cytoplasm (Figure 2). Living bacteria including Francisella tularensis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Legionella pneumophila were proved to be able to activate AIM2 inflammasomes. 45 , 47 , 48 What these bacteria have in common is that the infection processes often involve bacteriolysis to expose bacterial DNA to AIM2.
FIGURE 2.

Activation process of AIM2 inflammasome. AIM2 shows high sensitivity recognizing cytoplasm DNA from inner and outer damages. After recognizing dsDNA, AIM2 oligomerize with ASC and procaspase‐1 and form protein complex. Concentration of dsDNA in cytoplasm after bacterial infection can increase through bacteriolysis.
AIM2 is expressed in a relatively lower level compared with the situation with the existence of dsDNA, and there is only small chance for its oligomerization, which is important for binding with dsDNA and the interaction with ASCs. The activity of cellular AIM2 shows a significant increase after the stimuli of dsDNA in certain size. 44 One important pathway for the dsDNA recognition and AIM2 inflammasome activation is type I interferon pathway. After Francisella infection, the concentration of the dsDNA is insufficient for recognition and assembly of AIM2 inflammasome, so the bacterial DNA can first activate other dsDNA sensor in cytoplasm such as cGAS and lead to production of type I interferons, triggering bacteriolysis and a mass of bacterial DNA releasing into cytoplasm for the activation of AIM2 inflammasomes. 49 , 50
2.3. NAIP/NLRC4
Before the introduction of this part, it needs to be reminded in advance that unless otherwise specified, all NLRC4 and NLR family of apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP) results refer to mouse NLRC4 and NAIP, because in contrast to the observations in murine models, human cells can only encode one type of NAIP protein. 51 Unlike NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasome, the assembly of NLRC4 inflammasome can be facilitated by the direct recruitment of procaspase‐1 with the CARD domain of NLRC4. Some specific functions of NLRC4 inflammasome may not require the involvement of ASC, but the participation of the NAIPs. For the activation of NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome, NAIP family members act as pathogen‐sensing proteins. NAIPs contain a Baculovirus inhibitor‐of‐apoptosis repeat (BIR) domain at the N‐terminal. Emerging evidence suggested that NAIP family proteins are involved in the NLRC4‐medaited response to pathogens. For example, NAIP5 is related to the NLRC4 oligomerization in response to flagellin, a globular protein that arranges itself to form the filament in a bacterial flagellum, 52 while PrgJ, the bacterial rod protein, can induce NAIP2‐mediated NLRC4 oligomerization and activation. 53 Currently, there is no evidence showing the direct interaction between NLRC4 and T3ss or flagellin. Once NAIP proteins are activated, they can interact with inactivated NLRC4 that has not yet oligomerized, leading to the recruitment of more NLRC4 monomers and their oligomerization in a self‐propagating way. 54 (Figure 3) Apart from the activation form of binding to the protease caspase‐1 directly with the CARD domain and skipping ASC, NLRC4 can also bind to ASC, resulting in a more efficient form of inflammasome activation and the inflammatory reactions followed.
FIGURE 3.

Activation process of NLRC4 inflammasome. NLRC4 activation in mice is dependent on NAIPs and responses to bacterial infections. NAIP family members act as pathogen‐sensing proteins. NLRC4 activation can be triggered when purified bacterial flagellin is delivered into cytoplasm.
Studies of NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome focus mainly on conditions of bacterial infection, due to the fact that quite a few gram‐negative bacteria can induce pyroptosis through NLRC4‐caspase‐1‐dependent pathway. By delivering purified bacterial flagellin into the cytoplasm, caspase‐1‐dependent NLRC4 activation can be triggered. 55 What was observed about NAIPs/NLRC4 inflammasome first is that Salmonella infection in rodents can cause pyroptosis of macrophages in vitro. But in vivo systemic infection of Salmonella can escape from the immune detection, owing to the downregulated expression of flagellin and hiding from NAIPs/NLRC4 inflammasomes for this reason. Accordingly, the expression of flagellin can contrarily be elicited by NLRC4 for the clearance of pathogen. 56 Recently, advances have been made in the understanding of human NAIP/NLRC4. First experiment into hNAIPs showed that T3SS needle protein but not flagellin can activate hNAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome in human cell lines. 57 Following researches demonstrated that in human macrophages, hNAIP/NLRC4 can recognize both the T3SS needle protein and bacterial flagellin. 58
Under hyperactivated state, NLRP4 can lead to three inflammasome‐dependent cell death pathways in strict orders. The first one is the NLRC4–caspase‐1–gasdermin D (GSDMD) pyroptosis pathway, the impairment of which can lead to the second one, NLRC4–ASC–caspase‐8 apoptosis pathway, and when both of these two pathways are blocked, the NLRC4–caspase‐1–caspase‐3 apoptosis pathway, is initiated. 59 These research results explained the fact that during the canonical inflammasome pathway, the deletion of Casp1 can block the pyroptotic pathway but cell death can still happen in apoptosis‐dependent manner, and also demonstrated the fact that it might be necessary to block all the inflammasome‐related cell death pathways for the mitigation of corresponding inflammatory diseases.
3. STRUCTURE OF INFLAMMASOMES
As have been mentioned, inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes and are composed of a sensor, an adaptor and the downstream effector procaspase family proteins. The early works for the structure analysis of inflammasomes were based mainly on X‐ray and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technology. The basic structures of a few sensor proteins are shown in Figure 4. Recently, as scientists have made great progress in the cryo‐electron microscopy (cryo‐EM), more detailed elucidation of the three‐dimensional molecular architectures of inflammasomes are thus provided. Here, we summarize the recent advances being made in the structure analysis of several most important inflammasomes in both active and inactive forms.
FIGURE 4.

Basic structure of the sensors, adaptor and effector of inflammasomes. Schematic diagram of structure of NAIP and NATCH domain are also shown here. Sensors of inflammasome bind with the adaptor with PYD domain, while the recognition between adaptor and effector is carried out through CARD domain.
3.1. NLRP3 inflammasome
NLRP3 inflammasome is expressed in multiple types of cells, including myeloid cells, endocrine cells, muscle cells, neurons, and so on. It is also the most mysterious one given the fact that it can be activated by a wide variety of stimuli. The structure of full‐length NLRP3 always remains as a challenge, due to the difficulty of its purification and stabilization in vitro, as well as the limitation in technologies.
NLRP3 is given the name according to three domains within the protein, the centrally located triple‐ATPase NATCH domain, PYD at the N‐terminal and LRR domain at the C terminus (Figure 4). PYD together with death domain (DD), death effector domain (DED) and CARD are members of DD superfamily A cryo‐EM study showed that NATCH domain contains the nucleotide‐binding domain (NBD) as a part, together with a helical domain 1 (HD1), a winged helical domain (WHD) and a variable helical domain 2 (HD2). And LRRs are of curved shape, resulting in an earring‐shaped conformation of NLRP3. 60 Being supported by X‐ray crystallography and NMR techniques, it has been reported at 1.7 Å resolution that the PYD domain is equipped with the canonical antiparallel six‐helical (H1–H6) bundle structural fold of DD superfamily with five connecting loops. 61 Residues buried within the core of NLRP3 PYD are highly conserved among different PYDs, which implies the same mechanism to interact with ASC when NLRP3 is activated and PYDs are exposed on the surface of the protein complex and are not are not shielded by NACHT‐LRR. In addition, authors have identified a disulfide bond between Cys‐8 and Cys‐108 of α1 helix (H1) and loop connecting PYD and NATCH respectively, and this bond might be important for NLRP3's being activated by ROS. 61
A recent study using cryo‐EM technology revealed the native oligomeric form of murine NLRP3 in cells, identifying the structure of the full‐length mouse NLRP3 as double‐ring cages. 62 They used negative‐staining electron microscopy (EM) and revealed that the inactivated monomers of NLRP3 are 20–25 nm in size. Three‐dimensional structure of the NLRP3 was then reconstructed, being stabilized by dATP at resolution of 4.2 Å and used for model building. Noticeably, the final atomic model containing NATCH and LRR domains failed to model the PYD. The NLRP3 cage is formed through “face‐to‐face” and “back‐to‐back” interfaces of LRRs, both of which are indispensable, and the NATCH domains are barely in contact with other components. The disruption of PYDs can disrupt the structure and lead to dysfunction of NLRP3, which is shielded within the NATCH–LRR cages to avoid its binding with ASCs and assembling of NLRP3 inflammasomes therefore. It was also demonstrated that this double‐ring cage structure is necessary for NLRP3's membrane binding characteristic. 62 A following research purified full‐length, wild type human NLRP3 from baculovirus infected insect cells. 63 To stabilize the protein, scientists added CRID3 (or MCC950), a NLRP3‐specific inhibitor during the purification procedure. Using Titan Krios microscope to collect cryo‐EM data from 1588,061 particles, they reconstructed the model of NLRP3 decamer at a resolution of 4.1 Å, as well as a focused map of the LRR and the NATCH module at a resolution of 3.9 Å. They also identified eight subdomains of NLRP3 with the atomic model, PYD (3–94), and a linker segment (95–130); the fish‐specific NATCH‐associated (FISNA) (131–218), NBD (219–372), HD1 (373–434), WHD (435–541), and HD2 (542–649) for the NATCH domain; and transition LRR (trLRR; 650−742) and canonical LRR (cnLRR; 743−1036) for the LRR domain, stretching our understanding of the NLRP3 structure. 63
The release of NLRP3 from this autoinhibitory state requires the involvement of a series of kinases including NEK7 and phosphorylation of the upstream loop of the NBD. In a recent research, scientists coexpressed full‐length NLRP3 and NEK7 in Expi293F cells, then stimulated the cells with nigericin as the activator, activating human NLRP3–NEK7–ASC inflammasome. Then they used ATPγS, an ATP analog to stabilize the inflammasomes in the activated state. Cryo‐EM was applied to determine the structure of the complex at the resolution of 3.4 Å, showing that it is composed of 10 or 11 subunits, constituting a 10‐fold disk or a 11‐fold one. Remarkably, the binding site of NEK7 with the NLRP3 cage is competitive with the LRR–LRR interaction, indicating that NEK7 works to open the autoinhibitory cage. In contrast to the inactive state, NATCH domain rotates by ∼85.4° at the joint site of HD1 and WHD. It is worth noting that they have constructed an intact FISNA domain, and compared with inactive form, the disordered loop1 and helix2 became ordered, and conformation changes happened in loop2. These changes were demonstrated to be the prerequisite for autoactivation of NLRP3 and the formation of the oligomers. 64
3.2. AIM2 inflammasome
AIM2 is composed of a PYD at the N‐terminal that interacts with ASCs and a IFN‐inducible nuclear localization (HIN) domain at the C‐terminal which is responsible for the recognition of bacterial and viral dsDNA (Figure 4). 65 It is observed in AIM2 PYD that it can self‐oligomerize, making it hard to analyze the fine structure. Accordingly, appropriate mutation sites for deaggregation of AIM2 PYD are the key to solving the problem. Scientists chose F27 as the mutation for research and demonstrated its involvement in self‐association of AIM2 PYD. 66 Then they set up the corresponding mutant of AIM2 PYD and used molecular replacement in the program MOLREP. The structure analysis of AIM2 PYD revealed a highly conserved six‐helical bundle structure of the DD superfamily, and the crystal structure is similar to that of NLRP3 PYD at the resolution of 1.8 Å. 67 Let it be added here that early studies using NMR to characterize eight human PYDs and two mouse PYDs found out that all known PYDs share a characteristic short α3 helix in comparison with other DD superfamily members. 68 Multiple cytosolic filaments can be formed by these homotypic proteins, such as the DED filaments of caspase‐8. 69 And the PYD of AIM2 are short and dynamic, being the most variable among all the known PYDs. Scientists purified human AIM2 with it cloning into a pET30a‐derived vector with two tags, then concentrated for crystallization. X‐ray diffraction data suggested that the AIM2 PYD may bind the ASC PYD and the AIM2 HIN domains through overlapping surface. 67
Similar to NLRP3, scientists also attach great importance to elucidate the structure detail of AIM2 in both active and inactive forms. Using X‐ray crystallography to determine the crystal structure of AIM2 HIN domains in complexes with dsDNA, it has been revealed that the nonsequence‐specific DNA recognition is achieved through electrostatic interactions between positively charged HIN domains and the sugar‐phosphate backbone of dsDNA, and AIM2 is released from its autoinhibitory state after this combination. 70 However, only dsDNA but not ssDNA is capable of activating AIM2 inflammasome, 44 possibly due to the binding of HIN domains to both major and minor grooves of dsDNA. Further mutagenesis studies were carried out to determine the exact residues functioning in the binding procedure. The oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide‐binding (OB) fold domains can bind with single‐stranded and play an important role in the process after DNA damage. HIN is a variation of the OB fold consisting of a tandem pair of OB folds, OB1 and OB2. 71 The data showed that several residues such as K204A at OB1, K251A at the OB1–OB2 linker, and K309A at OB2 participate in the affinity of AMI2 HIN domains to dsDNA via hydrogen bonding, van der Waals interactions and salt bridges. Grouped mutations showed even more prominent effects. Mutagenesis experiments on full‐length AIM2 also led to impaired association between AIM2 and dsDNA, as well as the reduction of IL‐1β. 70
Of note, binding of dsDNA to HIN domains does not deny the function of AIM2 PYD in dsDNA recognition. Fluorescence anisotropy experiments were carried out to determine the role of PYD in dsDNA binding. Results suggested that full‐length AIM2 has higher affinity with dsDNA in comparison with HIN domains alone. Adding to the fact that mutations in PYD residues can impede the binding of full‐length AIM2 with dsDNA, AIM2 PYD is admittedly involved in the dsDNA binding. 72
3.3. NLRC4 inflammasome
Two domains are shared between NAIPs and NLRC4, the LRR domain and NATCH domain consists of NBD, HD1, WHD, and HD2, while NAIP also contains three BIR domains at the N terminal and for NLRC4 a CARD (Figure 4). A study reported the crystal structure of NLRC4 in closed/inactivated form demonstrated that the adenosine diphosphate (ADP)‐mediated interaction between NBD and WHD play an important role in the stabilization of NLRC4 in inactive form and its closed conformation. HD2 can contact a conserved α‐helix of NBD. These explain the autoinhibition mechanism of NAIP/NLRC4 and the function of NBD within. 73 Scientists further disrupted the ADP‐mediated interactions between NBD and WHD or between NBD and HD2, leading to constitutive activation of NLRC4. 73
An activated NAIP can recognize and bind with NLRC4 for the formation of inflammasome via ligand recognition. 74 NAIPs can at the same time bind with conserved ligands of bacteria, then recruit NLRC4 as the adaptor for the assembly of functional inflammasomes. NAIP2 can detect the inner rod protein of bacterial type III secretion system, while NAIP5 and NAIP6 can detect bacterial flagellin, in response to which was NLRC4 first observed. 55 A research assembled the FliC‐activated NAIP5‐NLRC4 complex and the PrgJ‐activated NAIP2‐NLRC4, then purified the proteins. EM data suggested that there is only one single NAIP exists in each complex, whether in a full disk or a partially assembled disk. 75 Cryo‐EM data on PrgJ–NAIP2–NLRC4 complex suggested that an inflammasome disk is composed of an inner ring and an outer ring from the top or bottom view with 11 or 12 copies of NAIP2 or NLRC4. The inner ring contains the NBD, HD1, and the WHD, while the outer ring consists of HD2 and the LRR domain. 75 It was observed in apoptosome assembly by Apaf‐1 that the conformation transition is achieved through exchange of ADP in the inactive state to ATP in the active state. 76 Authors tested if the same mechanism exists in the conformation transition of NLRC4, and the results indicated that there may exist alternative mechanisms. The NAIP1–NLRC4 interactions were further analyzed and it was shown that the NAIP2–NLRC4 interactions are extensive with a total surface area of ∼1000 Å2 per subunits per interaction, and contain a mixture of hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and charged interactions. 75
A study in 2017 using cryo‐EM reported the structure of the assembled ∼1.4‐megadalton flagellin–NAIP5–NLRC4 inflammasome, revealing that six distinct NAIP5 domains contact multiple conserved regions of flagellin, presenting NAIP5 into an open and active conformation for the assembly and activation of inflammasomes. 77 A following study in 2018 reported the cryo‐EM structure of NAIP5–NLRC4 at the resolution of 4.28 Å. For the stabilization of the activated form of NAIP5–NLRC4, the flagellin derivative for interacting with NAIP5 domains can be buried after its binding with NAIP5. 78 Both studies suggested that flagellin can bind to a deep pocket‐like structure formed by domains of NAIP5.
Most studies of NAIP/NLRC4 structure focus on murine NAIPs, as little is known about NAIPs in other species, especially human NAIPs. Recent studies with whole exome sequencing found out that human encode only one copy of full‐length NAIP protein, with some other truncated ones. We speculate that it is due to the high selective pressure for the organisms to survival under hyperinflammatory conditions. It has been reported that among seven mouse NAIPs, it is NAIP1 that functions as the mouse counterpart of hNAIP, 57 which may indicate the similarity in their structure.
3.4. Pyrin inflammasome
Pyrin inflammasome was discovered in researches of the molecular mechanism of familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) and pyrin‐associated autoinflammation with neutrophilic dermatosis, 79 and was demonstrated to be one of PRRs as an innate immune sensor. Once being activated, pyrin can assemble into protein complex with other components of inflammasome, leading to release of IL‐1β, IL‐18, and cell pyroptosis. 80 , 81 Pyrin is localized mainly in immune cells, and its expression can be regulated by various proinflammatory cytokines and pathogen components. 82 , 83 , 84
Human pyrin, which is a member of the superfamily of tripartite motif‐containing (TRIM), contains four functional subunits, that is the PYD, a zinc finger domain (Bbox), a coiled coil (CC) domain, and a B30.2/SPRY domain, while the pyrin of mice lack the B30.2/SPRY domain (Figure 4). 85 But the lack of ring domain makes pyrin an incomplete member of TRIM family. Report also proposed that pyrin oligomerizes via the CC domain. 86 Coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicated the function of B30.2/SPRY domain when overexpressed to interact with other inflammasome such as NLRP1, NLRP2, and NLRP3 as well as caspase family proteins, caspase‐1, and caspase‐4, 87 , 88 suggesting that pyrin inflammasome might be capable of regulating the function of other inflammasomes. Pyrin only shares the similarity of the PYD domain in structure with other sensors of inflammasome such as NLRP1, NLRP3, and AIM2, for the important role of PYD domain to interact with ASC. 89 This is consistent with the theory of structure and function adaptation.
3.5. Structure of other components of inflammasome complex
3.5.1. ASC
ASC consisting of an N‐terminal PYD (amino acid M1–T89) and a C‐terminal CARD (amino acids H113–S195) is a ∼24 kDa cytosolic adaptor protein of relatively conserved sequence. 90 , 91 It is expressed mainly in nucleus without stimuli, but translocate to cytoplasm and assembles into ASC specks after stimulation. 92 Then it can bind with both the sensors and procaspases with PYD and CARD domains respectively through homotypic interaction, leading to the formation of an activated and functional inflammasome protein complex. 90 , 93 Both PYD and CARD of ASC possess a canonical six‐helical bundle motif fold, while the former showing a PYD‐specific feature of a long loop between helices α2 and α3, and the helix 1 of the latter is absent with H1a. 91
For the activation of inflammasomes, ASC can form large oligomeric filaments to facilitate the recruitment of procaspases. 94 Sborgi et al. 95 applied cryo‐EM and NMR and determined that ASC assembles to long filaments in response to pathogen invasion and thus amplifies the inflammatory signal. The PYD of ASC forms the helical filament core while the CARD is flexibly attached to the filament periphery. 96
3.5.2. Caspases‐1
Caspase‐1, an inflammatory cytokine converting enzyme, was initially identified as the protease responsible for maturation of pro‐IL‐1β, and belongs to the aspartate‐specific cysteine protease family. 97 Procaspase‐1 is the inactive form of caspase‐1, and is expressed as a 404 amino acid‐monomer and catalytically dormant tripartite proenzyme. Procaspase‐1 consists of one N‐terminal CARD and a catalytic domain being composed of subunits p20 and p10, and is activated through autoproteolysis regulated by the assembly of inflammasomes or ASC pyroptosome. According to recent studies, CARD–CARD interaction between ASC and procaspase‐1 facilitates the recruitment of full‐length procaspase‐1 to inflammasome, generating an active form which can self‐process into mature caspase‐1 through cleavage of the link between p20 and p10 subunits. Procaspase‐1 can also be cleaved and activated by caspases in an amplification cascade manner. Generation of active caspase‐1 leads to cleavage of pro‐IL‐β, pro‐IL‐18, and inactive gasdermin family proteins, triggering proinflammatory cytokine release and pyroptotic cell death.
The CARD of caspase‐1 alone can polymerize into a filamentous macrostructure consisted of multiple subunits, with the inner diameter of ∼10 Å and the outer diameter of ∼80 Å, respectively. And the configuration is similar to that of the Myddosome DD complex and the MAVS CARD filament. 98 In this mentioned study, the caspase‐1 CARD domain filament was reconstructed with cryo‐EM technology, and structure was determined therefore. There are three types of asymmetric interactions between three interfaces. Site‐directed mutants were generated to validate the importance of residues of these interfaces. 98 Another research suggested that PYD and CARD of caspase‐1 both form filaments. In the presence of full‐length ASC or ASC CARD, polymerization of caspase‐1 CARD can increase as a result of activation of AIM2 or NLRP3. 96
4. BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF INFLAMMASOMES
4.1. Overview of biological functions of inflammasomes
The mobilization of immune system in mammals involves two distinct and interrelated systems, the innate immunity and adaptive immunity. The antigen‐presenting cells including macrophages, DCs, and so forth function as deliverers to present the information of endogenous danger signals and exogenous pathogen irritants to the B and T lymphocytes, playing leading roles in innate immunity. 99 For the detection of pathogens in innate immune cells, there exists two major classes of receptors, known as PRRs. One that found in the plasma membrane and endosomes can detect PAMPs and DAMPs in the extracellular environment, and this category contains TLRs and C‐type lectin receptors. Another was found to reside within the cells for detection of danger signals in the intracellular milieu, including RLRs and NLRs. 100 Inflammasome, which is expressed in various types of cells and reacts to a wide range of physiological and pathogenic stimuli, can thus act as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity (Figure 5). The release of proinflammatory cytokines and pyroptotic cell death will ultimately lead to the recruitment of more immune cells into the injury sites, clearing the foreign objects and repairing the tissues, or otherwise cause lingering of the disease. It was also reported that inflammasomes contribute to the development of adaptive immune cells. 101 The ablation of Nlrp3 in mice can damnify bone marrow B cell development and distort expression of marginal zone B cells in the spleen and B‐1a cells in the peritoneal cavity. 101 Though researches into inflammasomes focus mainly on immune cells, they are widely expressed in other cell types as well. Epithelial cells (ECs), for instance, can secrete proinflammatory cytokines Il‐1β and IL‐18 in a NLRP3 and caspase‐1‐dependent manner with presence of S. aureus and extracellular ATP. 102
FIGURE 5.

Inflammasomes work as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity in immunotherapy for tumors. Inflammasomes play an important role in detection of pathogens in innate immune cells, presenting these danger signals to adaptive immune cells. Inflammasomes also contribute to the development of adaptive immune cells. In tumor‐associated inflammation (TAI), inflammasomes can result in cancer cell death. This figure is created with BioRender.com.
The basic and prominent functions of inflammasome activation are the maturation of caspase and as a result, the secretion of proinflammatory IL‐1β and IL‐18 and cell pyroptosis. Il‐1β and IL‐18 both belong to the IL‐1 family. This cytokine family have a giant role influencing the immune system as they share similar functions with TLR family. These cytokines function through the interaction with their receptors, triggering innate inflammation, and can also function as DAMPs. 103 Pyroptosis was described by Brennan et al. 104 in a research of Salmonella‐induced macrophage cell death. By applying DNA dyes to mark rupture of cells, they observed a rapid and lytic cell death after infection. Due to cognitive limitations, this phenomenon was mistakenly described as a form of apoptotic cell death caused basically by bacterial virulence. But what this actually pointed out is the biological function of inflammasome in defending against pathogen infections, which has been described in many following researches. Currently understanding of pyroptosis evolves with the discovery of canonical and noncanonical inflammasome pathways, and the downstream effector molecules they have in common, the gasdermin family proteins. In the past decade, pyroptosis has been proved to play a protective role and maintain the homeostasis of immune system, although it has also been linked with tissue damage, organ failure and lethality in sepsis when aberrantly activated. 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 In recent years, the construction of mice models by knocking out different components of inflammasome complex demonstrated that inflammasomes play central roles in the immune responses against pathogen infections. As a concrete manifestation that ASC−/− were more susceptible to S. pneumoniae infection than wild‐type mice, 109 and that AIM2‐deficient mice displayed an increased susceptibility to mucosal infection with Salmonella typhimurium, showing more severe body weight loss, intestinal damage, intestinal inflammation, and disruption of basal and activated EC turnover. 110 Murine neutrophils, the most abundant type of granulocytes and the most abundant type of white blood cells, can express functional cell surface P2X7R during S. pneumoniae corneal infection, leading to NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL‐1β secretion for bacterial clearance. 111
More importantly, the protective effects of inflammasomes come into play not only in the form of pyroptotic cell death, as inflammasome activation can lead to distinct‐different cell fates. 112 Emerging evidence also suggests that the activation of inflammasomes will not necessarily result in pyroptosis. For example, as we have mentioned, AIM2 inflammasome can fuel PANoptosis by forming a large multiprotein complex with pyrin, Z‐DNA binding protein 1 and ASC, caspase‐1, caspase‐8, RIPK3, RIPK1, FADD. This protein complex is referred to as AIM2 PANoptosome, being formed and functioning as part of the host defence. 46 CAPS model mice carrying an Nlrp3 R258w mutation are strongly resistant to experimental colitis and colorectal cancer through remodeling of gut microbiota with enhanced anti‐inflammatory capacity of regulatory T cells (Tregs). 113 NLRC4 inflammasome in neutrophils can selective promote the maturation of IL‐1β without the occurrence of pyroptosis during acute Salmonella infection, which is different from the condition in macrophages under the same challenge. 114 Interestingly, inflammasomes in DCs can release inflammatory cytokines from either living (hyperactive form) or dead (pyroptotic) cells, 34 it was reported that when encountered with bacterial components and self‐encoded oxPAPC, DCs can enter a hyperactive state, producing inflammatory cytokines through caspase‐11‐dependent noncanonical inflammasome pathway and inducing adaptive immune responses. 34 And the release of inflammatory cytokines from living cells without cell rupture was also observed in other phagocytes. 36 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 Inflammasome activators such as bacteria and other pathogen products or host‐derived oxidized lipids can lead to GSDMD‐dependent IL‐1β release from hyperactive macrophage. 116 This also indicates diverse functions of membrane pore formed by gasdermin family proteins. It is reasonable to speculate that the aim of this hyperactive state is for the maintenance of continuously active immune reactions and thorough clearance of pathogens. There is also hypothesis that these phagocytes undergo membrane repair by endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) to remove the GSDMD pores, which is already been proven in pyroptotic BMDMs, but not in hyperactive cells yet. 118
Tumor‐associated inflammation (TAI) is an important hallmark of nearly all cancers, and has the function of either promoting tumorigenesis and progression or suppressing it, 119 which is consistent with the fact that inflammasome can play a dual role in the pathogenesis of cancer. 120 It was back to 19th century that Rudolf Virchow, a pathologist form Germany observed infiltration of a large number of inflammatory cells in the tumor tissues, hypothesizing that tumors were originated from chronic inflammatory responses. The inflammatory cytokines produced by inflammasome activation contribute to systemic low‐grade inflammation, and forming inflammatory microenvironment in autocrine or paracrine manners. 121 In addition, the recruitment of immune cells and fatty acid‐induced inflammasome activation's interference of insulin signaling 24 also promote the progression of cancer. For the antitumor immunity regulated by inflammasome activation, immunogenic cancer cell death can apparently enhance antitumor immunity. 122 There are also studies supporting the theory that inflammatory cytokines secreted by immune cells with inflammasome activated can regulate the activity of T cells, as IL −1β functions as a pivotal regulator of the T cell fates. IL‐1 administration in cells can result in enhancement of granzyme B and increased capacity for IFN‐γ production. In vivo experiments show enhancement of protective value of weak immunogens. 123 In liver and lungs, IL −1β can lead to increase of CD4 and CD8 cells in number, and augmented differentiation of the antigen‐triggered T cells. 124 In particular, hyperactive DCs can promote the generation of potent cytotoxic CD8 T cell immunity. In an in vitro model of interaction between DCs and T cells, bone marrow‐derived DCs showed weak capacity to active naïve or memory CD8 T cells. 2 T cells primed by living DCs in lymph nodes, however, make a transition into a third phase of high motility and rapid proliferation. 125 The efficacy of chemotherapy depends partly on DCs for its presenting antigens from tumor cells to T lymphocytes. Chemotherapy was also proven to promise great result when combined with the modification of inflammasomes in DCs. 126 Oxaliplatin, doxorubicin, and other platinum‐based chemotherapeutic agents, are capable of eliciting tumor cell death in a caspase‐1‐dependent manner suggested by Casp1−/− mice model. 127 , 128 For another, the debris of tumor cells including ATP and HMGB1 act as DAMPs, triggering activating NLRP3 inflammasomes. 129 Hyperactivation of the PI3K–AKT pathway caused by intrinsic loss of PTEN, a tumor suppressor, can lead to tumor resistance to anticancer therapies. 130 , 131 , 132 And it has been demonstrated that PTEN expression in myeloid cells is determinant for chemotherapy‐induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation and its antitumor effect. 126 For more accurate description of the role of hyperactive DCs and inflammasomes in antitumor therapeutics, more studies in this field are needed.
Though different inflammasomes are activated through relative separated pathways, recent evidence demonstrated that more complex interactions between inflammasomes can work in either synergy or antagonism ways. Experimental autoimmune uveitis, an experimental autoimmune disease, has been proved to associate with NLRP3 inflammasome. 133 In the Nlrp3−/− mice, the deficiency of Nlrp3 results in upregulated transcription of Aim2, while overexpression of Nlrp3 an attenuate inflammation through inhibition of AIM2 inflammasome. 134 This provides us with important evidence of antagonism effects among inflammasomes.
4.2. Functions of NLRP3 inflammasome
The biological functions of NLRP3 protein include its involvement in inflammasome formation, actions in response to oxidative stress and functioning as a transcription factor. 135 And NLRP3 inflammasome is critical in the maintenance of homeostasis against pathogen infections and plays a dual role, as the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and cell pyroptosis can cause tissue damage at the same time of pathogen clearance. 136 , 137 The activation of NLRP3 inflammasome can also lead to inflammatory cell death not only depends on IL‐1, IL‐18, or pyroptosis, but rather in form of PANoptosis, a more complex integration of pyroptosis, apoptosis and necroptosis. 138 Autoimmune disorders, of which rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), inflammatory bowel disease (IBDs), and so on are the most commonly seen, show strong connection with NLRP3 inflammasome. 139 For example, high level mRNA of NLRP3 and other components of the inflammasome complex were detected in samples from patients with RA. 140 , 141 It has also been demonstrated by animal models that synovial succinate accumulation is to blame for fibrosis in RA by inducing NLRP3 inflammasome activation. It has also been demonstrated that mutation of NLRP3 and CARD8 can lead to higher disease activity of RA. 142 In recent years, scientists showed great interest in the involvement of NLRP3 inflammasome in both antitumor therapies and tumorigenesis studies. For example, it has been demonstrated that by blocking NLRP3 inflammasome activation with MCC950, antitumor immune responses in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were improved. 143 Recently, a study to illustrate the mechanism of Salmonella immunotherapy suggested the necessity of NLRP3 engagement as well as the recruitment of macrophages to tumor microenvironment, supporting the position participation of NLRP3 inflammasome in antitumor activity. 144
4.3. Functions of AIM2 inflammasome
As is indicated by its activation mechanism, AIM2 inflammasome is important for protection of the body from viral infection. Some viruses even developed strategies to escape from detection of AIM2 inflammasome. For example, HSV‐1 was demonstrated to express VP22, a tegument protein, thus inhibit the AIM2 inflammasome activation and the following release of inflammatory cytokines. 145 Interestingly, in addition to its activation through recognition of dsDNA, studies also reported the role of AIM2 inflammasome in RNA viral infection. With Aim2 silenced, human dermal fibroblasts infected with Chikungunya virus showed reduced cleavage and maturation of caspase‐1 as well as the release of IL‐1β. 146 But the precise mechanism for AIM2 responding to RNA viral infection requires further researches.
Abnormal expression of AIM2 in immune cells also contributes the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. In AIM2/DNase II dual‐deficient mice, for example, improvement of pathological manifestations of RA and reduced level of caspase‐1 and IL‐1β production were both observed. 147 SLE also shows correlation with AIM2 inflammasome. Scientists detected the expression level of AIM2 in patients with SLE and observed an enhancement of expression in both peripheral blood and skin lesions. It was further demonstrated that AIM2 can promote T cell differentiation during SLE progression. 148
4.4. Functions of NLRC4 inflammasome
As it can be activated by T3SS proteins from gram‐negative bacteria such as Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium), NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome is important for immune responses against gram‐negative pathogens. 114 , 149 , 150 It is worth noting that Nlrc4 knockout mice have no difference in bacterial load compared with wild type mice after S. Typhimurium infection, while Nlrc4 and Nlrp3 double knockout animals are highly susceptible to the infection. Synergy and complement in functions of each other and redundant roles for inflammasome receptors might be the reasons. NLRC4 inflammasome exists not only in immune cells, it can also assemble in intestinal ECs for protection against enteric pathogen. 151 Research about Helicobacter pylori infection showed opposite role of NLRC4 inflammasome, while Nlrc4‐deficient mice control the bacterial burden better than wild type animals. 152 This suggest that the precise function of NAIP/NLRC 4 inflammasome is pathogen specific.
Similar to other inflammasomes, mutations in NAIPs or NLRC4 contribute to autoinflammatory diseases and cancer in human as well. 54 , 153 , 154 , 155 , 156 Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) belongs to a broader category named hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and is developed in patients with rheumatic disorders. It has been demonstrated that MAS is associated with NLRC4 mutation for the increase of IL‐18 production. 157 By construction of NLRC4−/− mice model, it was demonstrated that the knockout of Nlrc4 leads to more aggressive tumor invasion and increased tumor numbers and load, suggesting the protective effect of NLRC4 inflammasome on colonic tumor. 158 Another research suggested that NLRC4 can protect mice against mucosal and systemic challenges, including epithelial injury induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). 159
Apart from pyroptotic cell death, NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome is also shown to be related to other cell death forms, such as PANoptosis. PANoptosis is regulated by PANoptosome, a molecule scaffold for the engagement of molecule components of other regulated cell death forms including apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis. 160 While most of the studies on PANoptosis are focused on NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasomes, evidence also suggests that NLRC4 inflammasome might also plays a part. Both the activation of PANoptosis and NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome were observed during S. Typhimurium infection. 114 , 160 To elucidate the association and interplay between NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome and PANoptosis, further experiments are indispensable.
4.5. Functions of pyrin inflammasome
As we have discussed, FMF originates from the gain of function mutation of MEFV gene. Treatment of the disease focuses mainly on preventing the outbreak of inflammatory responses, and administration of colchicine for inhibition of inflammation together with Anakinra in case of colchicine resistance promises great results. 161 , 162 Previous understanding of mutations' function in diseases can be summarized as the loss of negative regulation on other inflammasomes and the enhanced inflammation thereafter. 163 However, there is also evidence suggesting that the gain of function mutation might explain inflammatory phenotype in FMF. 164 Further researches for clarification are therefore needed.
Apart from the function of PYD in autoinflammatory diseases, it has also been suggested that pyrin inflammasome contributes to the pathogen pattern recognition of mammalian innate immunity in cytosol. 165 This study elucidated that pyrin inflammasome can sense the modification of host Rho protein, thereby achieving recognition of related pathogenic bacteria. In addition, evidence for development of vaccine and neutralizing antibodies targeting TcdA/B toxin is thus provided.
4.6. Functions of noncanonical inflammasome
In particular, the cytoplasmic LPS of gram‐negative have been shown to directly bind with caspase‐4/5 166 , 167 of human or caspase‐11 168 , 169 of mice in the cytosol and activate noncanonical inflammasome pathway. LPS internalized through the secretion of outer membrane vesicles from gram‐negative bacteria can also trigger caspase‐11‐dependent inflammatory reaction and pyroptosis. 169 Caspase‐11 is expressed in ECs. In the model of pulmonary ECs transfected with FITC‐labeled LPS in lipofectamine‐based liposomes, it was demonstrated that caspase‐11‐mediated pyroptosis activated with LPS can trigger cardiovascular inflammation, and can be a promising target for acute lung injury therapeutics. 170 Here, we review the function of noncanonical inflammasome pathway focusing mainly on its role in antimicrobial defense and inflammatory responses as well as its function in some autoimmune diseases.
Intracellular LPS‐induced noncanonical inflammasome pathway was demonstrated to be caspase‐1‐dependent, implying that the stimuli will also lead to the activation of canonical inflammasome pathway simultaneously. 30 In this mentioned research, macrophages were infected with Escherichia coli, Citrobacter rodentium, or Vibrio cholerae, while Casp11−/− mice showed defects in IL‐1 production. By comparison between Casp1−/− and Casp1/11−/− knockout mice, authors drew the conclusion that it might be caspase‐11 rather than caspase‐1 is to blame for the deleterious inflammatory responses 30 As we have discussed, oxPAPC can elicit inflammatory cytokine production and release from living DCs. 2 In noncanonical inflammasome pathway, oxPAPC seems to play dual roles. In macrophages, it was shown that oxPAPC can inhibit the activation of caspase‐4/11‐dependent inflammasome by competitively binding with caspases with LPS, which is consistent with the in vivo experiment that oxPAPC inhibits the noncanonical inflammasome in macrophages and protect mice model from septic shock. 171 In DCs, however, oxPAPC activate noncanonical inflammasome that process IL‐1β without resulting in pyroptosis. 34 To elucidate the anti‐ and proinflammatory effects of noncanonical inflammasome in pathogen infections, more researches are urgently needed to shed light on this issue.
In autoimmune diseases, the functions of noncanonical inflammasome provide us with evidence for targeted therapy as well. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord (central nervous system), which has been reported to be highly relevant to canonical inflammasome activation pathway. And it has been demonstrated that noncanonical inflammasome also play a part in the progression of MS. During this disease, the immune system attacks the protective sheath that covers nerve fibers, leading to neuroinflammation. 172 Oligodendrocytes (OLGs) are a type of neuroglia, the death of which is a major risk factor of pathogenesis of MS. And it has been demonstrated that both caspase‐1 and caspase‐11 are actively involved in OLG death. Further experiments using encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of MS, suggested that the symptoms of the disease were improved in the caspase‐11‐deficient mice. 173 In DCs where the actions of noncanonical inflammasome are well characterized, it has been reported that IFN‐β, which decreases relapse rate and disease activity of MS, can elicit apoptotic cell death of DCs by increasing the expression of caspase‐11. 174 To sum up, caspase‐11‐dependent noncanonical inflammasome pathway can be a novel therapeutic target for MS. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) also belong to autoimmune diseases, and is characterized by sterile inflammation with the loss of renal inherent parenchyma cells, podocytes. 175 , 176 , 177 Cheng et al. 178 demonstrated that caspase‐11/4‐dependent inflammasome activation and the following GSDMD‐dependent pyroptosis contribute to podocyte loss, thus play a part in DN pathogenesis. Monosodium urate crystal (MSU) acts as a stimuli for inflammasome activation. 179 , 180 , 181 Accumulation of MSU in joint spaces and chronic inflammation brought about lead to gout. 182 , 183 In caspase‐11‐deficient mice and macrophages derived from the animals, gout specific cytokine release was shown to decrease, and neutrophil failed to produce neutrophil extracellular traps when treated with MSU, 184 providing evidence for targeting noncanonical inflammasome for the treatment of gout. The function of noncanonical inflammasome in IBDs has been reviewed. 185 Authors proposed the either aggravating 186 , 187 or protective 188 , 189 , 190 role of capase‐11 noncanonical inflammasome in the pathogenesis of IBDs.
5. THERAPEUTIC TARGETS OF INFLAMMASOMES
5.1. Inflammasome‐related diseases
According to the biological functions, we can conclude that inflammasomes have different roles under different conditions, functioning as a double‐edged sword in human diseases. Depending on whether it is related to infection, these diseases can be divided into two main categories, microbial infectious diseases and sterile inflammatory diseases.
NLRP3 inflammasome, which is the most widely studied, has been proved to play an important role in the immune responses against bacteria, virus, fungi and parasite infections mainly through indirect recognition. Quite a few studies suggest that microbe activate inflammasomes through induction of cellular stress and injury‐related signals. For example, elder mice were demonstrated to be notably more susceptible to respiratory viral infection, showing immoderate inflammation and increased mortality due to aberrant activation of STING and NLRP3 inflammasome modulated by shortened telomeres. 191 Scientists established the animal model by exposing wild‐type mice and Terc−/− mice, an animal model characterized by premature aging phenotype, to influenza A virus (IAV) and vesicular stomatitis virus, respectively. The macrophages of Terc−/− mice show STING‐driven inflammatory property, leading to more severe inflammatory response and worsen survival rate compared with wild‐type mice. Ulteriorly, they detected the induction of NLRP3, cleavage of caspase‐1 and IL‐1β, and the oligomerization of ASC. The results showed that the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome was enhanced after IVA infection in Terc−/− macrophages. Further experiment confirmed the hypothesis that this activation is integral into the STING‐driven pathway. 191 An earlier research suggested that metformin can improve LPS‐induced ARDS through suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome. 192 To avoid overactivation of inflammasome, many microbe have evolved with a system to escape from the detection of the sensor of inflammasome. For example, NS1 protein of 2009 pandemic IVA was proved to target NLRP3 inflammasome directly and suppress its activation. 193 Since the end of 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection has been attracting great attention as it cause threat to global health. Emerging researches suggested that NLRP3 inflammasome activation is closely related to severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). After the virus's entry into epithelial or endothelial cells of the lung, SARS‐CoV‐2 initiates. Released proinflammatory cytokines lead to NLRP3 inflammasome activation in infiltrated macrophages and neutrophils, resulted in hyperinflammation. 194 In a recent research, it has been further illuminated that infected ECs produce DNA as DAMPs, which acts as the signal II in inflammasome activation in myeloid cells, leading to IL‐1β release, and eventually IL‐6 release from both ECs and leukocytes. This epithelial‐immune circuit causes inflammatory cytokine storm in severe COVID‐19. 195 The outcome of these infectious diseases varies, and it can be either good or bad depending on the pathogens, the specific organs and tissues, the effector cells involved and the genetic background.
In sterile inflammatory diseases including crystal deposition disorder, neurodegenerative diseases and depression, atherosclerosis, insulin resistance, IBD, and cancer, the role of inflammasome is more diverse. In general, the pathogenesis of these diseases is related to the exquisite activation of inflammasomes. The activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and the following maturation and release of inflammatory cytokines are demonstrated to be important risk factors in CVDs. The CANTOS trials are a series of experiments focusing on the anti‐inflammatory thrombosis outcome of Canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody of IL‐1β. Being randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled, the trials demonstrated that the activation of inflammasome acts as the cause rather than the consequence of atherothrombosis, indicating the clinical use of this category of chemical compound in CVDs. In recent years, the researches into inflammasome in cancers have also grabbed a lot attention. Scientists attach great importance to the utilization of inflammasome modification in immunotherapy for tumors. Tumorigenesis, the proliferation of tumor cells and metastasis are all related to the alteration effect on tumor microenvironment of inflammasome. 196 But under some specific conditions, inflammasome can work as the enemy of tumor cells. 3
5.2. Advances in inflammasome‐targeted therapy
Based on the fact that the pathogenesis of many diseases is related to aberrant activation of inflammasome or unwonted genetic background, inflammasome inhibition can be an effective measure for treatment. For the inhibition of inflammasome activation and the following biological effects, current strategies include targeting the components of inflammasome complex or targeting the downstream inflammatory cytokines. For example, recent researches targeting IL‐1, the major and foremost inflammatory cytokine processed by inflammasomes, have shown great results in multiple clinical trials (Table 1). Apart from Canakinumab in CANTOS trials, other blockers including Anakinra, Gevokizumab, and Rilonacept are also demonstrated in clinical trials to be effective in certain diseases. 197 , 198 , 199 One challenge of the utilization of these blockers revealed by the clinical trials is the off‐target effect, which lead to fatal infection. Li et al. come up with a strategy to overcome this limitation by using platelet microparticles for the accumulation of blockers in specific sites. This indicates a new direction to develop certain resort for the delivery of drugs to target particular organs and cells. Apart from inhibition of its activation, more researches for the precise functions of inflammasome in different conditions are needed for more purposeful and effective modification.
TABLE 1.
Major IL‐1β antagonists and a part of relative clinical trials.
| IL‐1β antagonists | Mechanism of actions | Condition | Phase of clinical trials | NCI number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anakinra | IL‐1 receptor antagonist that binds to IL‐1 receptors with an affinity similar to that of IL‐1α and IL‐1β | Multiple myeloma | Phase 2 | NCT03233776 |
| Covid19 | Phase 3 | NCT04680949 | ||
| Acute myocarditis | Phase 2 | NCT03018834 | ||
| Phase 3 | ||||
| Type I diabetes | Phase 1 | NCT00645840 | ||
| Phase 2 | ||||
| Acute myocardial infarction, heart failure | Phase 2 | NCT01175018 | ||
| Gout, chronic kidney diseases | Phase 2 | NCT02578394 | ||
| Phase 3 | ||||
| Metastatic colorectal, cancer | Phase 2 | NCT02090101 | ||
| Acute gouty arthritis | Phase 2 | NCT03002974 | ||
| Heart failure | Phase 1 | NCT01300650 | ||
| Phase 2 | ||||
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Phase 3 | NCT00117091 | ||
| Canakinumab | Fully human anti‐IL‐1β monoclonal antibody that selectively blocks IL‐1β and has no cross‐reactivity with other characterized IL‐1 family members, including IL‐1α and IL‐1Ra | Non‐small cell lung cancer | Phase 2 | NCT03968419 |
| Schnitzler syndrome | Phase 2 | NCT01276522 | ||
| Type I diabetes | Phase 2 | NCT00947427 | ||
| Diabetes mellitus, type 2 | Phase 3 | NCT04510493 | ||
| Cryopyrin‐associated periodic syndromes, familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome, Muckle‐Wells syndrome | Phase 3 | NCT01576367 | ||
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Phase 2 | NCT00554606 | ||
| Rilonacept | A dimeric fusion protein consisting of the ligand‐binding domains of the extracellular portions of the human IL‐1R1 and IL‐1RAcP and neutralizes IL‐1 | Recurrent pericarditis | Phase 3 | NCT03737110 |
| Type 1 diabetes mellitus | Phase 1 | NCT00962026 | ||
| Scleroderma, systemic sclerosis, diffuse scleroderma, diffuse systemic sclerosis | Phase 1, Phase 2 | NCT01538719 | ||
| Familial Mediterranean fever | Phase 2 | NCT00582907 | ||
| Muckle–Wells syndrome, Schnitzler syndrome | Phase 2 | NCT01045772 | ||
| Gout | Phase 2 | NCT00610363 | ||
| Recurrent pericarditis | Phase 2 | NCT03980522 | ||
| XOMA 052 (gevokizumab) | IL‐1β antibody that reduces the affinity of IL‐1β for its signaling receptor and coreceptor but not its decoy and soluble inhibitory receptors | Osteoarthritis | Phase 2 | NCT01882491 |
| Diabetes mellitus type 1 | Phase 2 | NCT01788033 | ||
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | Phase 2 | NCT01144975 |
Clinical trial data source: clinicaltrials.gov.
In recent years, in addition to the traditional strategies to deal with inflammasome complex and cytokines, new approaches for controlling related diseases emerged with the advances in technologies. Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are widely used in biomedical field in recent years due to its interaction with body's immune system and capacity to activate immune responses. Many have become United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)‐approved or preclinically promising nanomedicines with their highly efficient delivery and increased safety. 200 , 201 ENMs can be applied to human in different ways including subcutaneous administration, inhalation administration, and systemic administration, leading to diametrically opposite outcomes, including immune activation, immune suppression or homeostasis turbulence, and it depends largely on antigen property and different physicochemical characteristics of ENMs. 202 For the involvement and application of ENMs in inflammasome‐related diseases, evidence suggested that ENMs can be recognized by immune systems through PRR signaling, acting as PAMPs or DAMPs. 203 And they may even have depot effect for the activation of inflammasomes. 204 As for the precise mechanism of ENMs' participation in NLRP3 inflammasome activation, some studies suggested that it might be the generation of ROS 205 and surface modification of ENMs 206 that work. Scientists developed and applied an inflammation‐targeted Celastrol (Cel) nanodrug in both in vivo and in vitro experiments for the delivery of Cel, which has shown antirheumatic activity against RA. The result demonstrated this nanodrug can effectively inhibit the repolarization of macrophages toward M1 phenotype and alleviate the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. 207
Over the past decades, efforts have also been made in the application of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) for disease treatment, several of which have already gained approval of US FDA. There are two major categories of ncRNA, microRNAs (miRNAs) and long ncRNAs (lncRNAs). The bio‐functions of these RNA sequences without the capacity of translating into protein remain largely unknown, but emerging evidence suggests that they can mediate RNA interference, thus regulate the function of immune system and the operation of inflammasomes. Therapeutic targeting of the naturally originated ncRNAs may promise great result for the treatment of inflammasome‐related diseases.
There lies two major advantages of targeting ncRNAs. First, according to central dogma of molecular biology, ncRNA therapeutics can target at several genes in one signal transduction pathway simultaneously. In the second place, as naturally occurring molecules rather than synthetic, ncRNAs have all the mechanisms in place for processing and downstream modifications. 208 In the past few years, both miRNAs and lncRNAs were reported to involve in the activation of inflammasomes. For example, nuclear enriched abundant transcript 1 (Neat1), a lncRNA which is upregulated under hypoxic conditions in a HIF‐2α‐dependent manner, was identified to associate with NLRP3 inflammasome in mouse macrophage, and can also promote the activation of NLRC4 and AIM2 inflammasomes, enhance caspase‐1 activation and inflammatory cytokine production and pyroptotic cell death. 209 The ortholog of Neat1 in human, NEAT1, was proved to maintain the structural integrity of the paraspeckles. 210 With regard to the application ncRNA in inflammasome‐related diseases, it was reported that miRNA circuits can orchestrate aberrant intestinal inflammasome of IBDs by targeting at NLRP3 inflammasome. 211 In the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract, the only monolayer ECs space out the gut microbiome from the body. To refrain from persistent inflammatory reactions and homeostasis imbalance of body's immune system, mammals have evolved a complex mucosal immune system with precise regulation of inflammasome and activation. IBDs, including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, are hypothesized by be the result of a dysregulated innate immune response. 212 Opinions toward the specific role of inflammasome in IBDs differed. In this study, scientists identified miR‐223 as not only a biomarker in patients with IBDs, but also a target for suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. 211
5.3. NLRP3 targeting strategies
Current treatments available for NLRP3‐related diseases target mainly at proinflammatory cytokines. Anakinra works as a human IL‐1 receptor antagonist, Canakinumab is a human anti‐IL‐1β monoclonal antibody developed by Novartis, and Rilonacept is a recently approved decoy IL‐1R for prevention and treatment of recurrent pericarditis. 213 , 214 , 215 The defect is that these drugs only treat the symptoms but not the root cause. This highlights the importance of developing NLRP3‐specific therapeutics.
MCC950, also named CRID3, is a small‐molecule inhibitor for the NLRP3 inflammasome and is demonstrated to be effective in many NLRP3‐dependent inflammatory reactions. A study established mouse models of diseases related to NLRP3 activation or gain of function mutations of nlrp3, utilizing intraperitoneal injection of LPS and expression of the Muckle–Wells syndrome (MWS) associated mutation Nlrp3A350VneoR in myeloid lineage, respectively. MCC950 used as treatments showed effects in both in vivo and in vitro experiments. Follow‐up researches demonstrates the efficacy of MCC950 in many in vivo disease models.
Except the application value of MCC950 in disease models, what also interests us is the precise mechanism of MCC950's specific inhibition effect on NLRP3, the understanding of which can help to lower side effects of MCC950 and design more effective drugs. It has been confirmed that lysosomal destabilization, mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS production, tubulin acetylation and K+ efflux were proved to have nothing to do with the function mechanisms of MCC950. Based on the hypothesis that MCC950 target directly at NLRP3, the scientists applied a drug affinity responsive target stability assay and drew the conclusion that MCC950 protects NLRP3 in both active and inactive conformations, but cannot protect NEK7 from protease. 216 Then they also used a synthesized photoaffinity probe to verify the conclusion that MCC950 interacts directly with NLRP3. 216 To further decide the concrete domain that MCC950 bind with, full‐length NLRP3 was expressed in HEK293T as the vehicle. The result suggested that MCC950 can bind with the Walk B motif in NATCH domains, which is suggested to play a vital role in ATPase activity of NBD, thus blocking the hydrolysis capacity of NLRP3 on ATP for activation. 216 A back‐to‐back study confirmed that MCC950 can close the ‘open’ conformation of activated NLRP3 in both wild type NLRP3 and autoinflammatory‐related mutants. 217 Recently, relying on the utilization of cryo‐EM technology, scientists made a further step, elucidated the binding site of MCC950 on NLRP3 decamer and its ability to keep NLRP3 locked in an inactive conformation. 63 These evidence support further researches to develop more NLRP3‐specific small inhibitory molecules. Besides MCC950, there are many other small molecules targeting NLRP3 inflammasome and are summarized in Table 2.
TABLE 2.
NLRP3 inhibitors and related disease models.
| NLRP3 inhibitors | Mechanisms of actions | Disease models | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCC950 | Interact with the Walker B motif in the NACHT domain of NLRP3 and block NLRP3‐mediated ATP hydrolysis | PD, AD, asthma, IR lung injury, ARDS/COPD, atherosclerosis, hypertension, myocardial infarction, heart failure, colitis, acute liver failure, NASH, IR liver injury, liver fibrosis, insulin resistance, renal fibrosis, MWS, rheumatoid arthritis | 218 |
| CY‐09 | Interact with the Walker A motif in the NACHT domain of NLRP3 and block NLRP3‐mediated ATP hydrolysis | AD, T2DM | 219 |
| Bay‐11‐7082 | Block NF‐κB pathway and the priming of NLRP3 inflammasome | Psoriasis, diabetic neuropathy, cardiac ischemia–reperfusion injury, ATL | 220 , 221 , 222 , 223 |
| Parthenolide | Block STAT3/NF‐κB pathway and the priming of NLRP3 inflammasome | Insulin resistance | 224 |
| BOT‐4‐one | The NLRP3 alkylation by BOT‐4‐one led to an impaired ATPase activity of NLRP3 | Arthritis | 225 |
| OLT1177(Dapansutrile) | Reduce ATPase activity of t NLRP3, prevent NLRP3‐ASC and NLRP3‐caspase‐1 interaction | MS (EAE), colitis, allergic asthma, AD, gouty arthritis | 226 , 227 , 228 , 229 , 230 |
| INF39 | Inhibit the interaction of NEK7‐NLRP3 | IBD, T2DM, drug‐induced liver injury, acute colitis, pancreatitis | 231 |
| HS‐203873 | |||
| Tranilast | Directly bind to the NACHT domain of NLRP3 and suppresses the assembly of NLRP3 inflammasome | Atherosclerosis, COVID‐19, GDM, myocardial infarction | 232 , 233 , 234 , 235 |
| Oridonin | Form a covalent bond with the cysteine 279 of NLRP3 in NACHT domain to block the interaction between NLRP3 and NEK7 | Acute lung injury, pleurisy, myocardial infarction, liver fibrosis, acute liver injury, traumatic brain injury, noise‐induced hearing loss, reperfusion injury, silicosis | 236 , 237 , 238 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 |
| RRx‐001 | Bind to cysteine 409 of NLRP3 via its bromoacetyl group and therefore blocks the interaction between NLRP3 and NEK7 | LPS‐induced systemic inflammation, EAE, DSS‐induced colitis, MSU‐induced peritonitis | 245 |
| JC‐171 | Interfere with NLRP3/ASC interaction | EAE | 246 |
| Rg3 | Abrogate NEK7‐NLRP3 interaction | Myocardial infarction, ulcerative colitis, hepatic damage, myocardial hypertrophy, cisplatin‐induced kidney injury | 247 |
| C1‐27(&25) | Inhibit GSTO1‐1, which deglutathionylates cysteine 253 in (NEK7) to promote NLRP3 activation | ||
| Artemisinin | Suppress interaction between NEK7 and NLRP3 | AD, burn sepsis, tubulointerstitial inflammation, gout, IgA nephropathy, atherosclerosis, myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury, dry eye disease, ulcerative colitis | 248 |
| KN3014 | Target the interaction between NLRP3 and ASC through the PYD, reduce ASC‐speck formation | ||
| β‐Carotene | Directly bind to the pyrin domain of NLRP3 | Gouty arthritis | 249 |
| NIC‐0102 (27) | Induce the polyubiquitination of NLRP3, interfere with the NLRP3‐ASC interaction, and block ASC oligomerization | Ulcerative colitis | 250 |
| Wedelolactone | Promote the Ser/Thr phosphorylation of NLRP3 to inhibit inflammasome activation | Gouty arthritis, ulcerative colitis, cardiac fibrosis, collagen‐induced arthritis | 251 |
Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer's disease; AKI, acute kidney injury; ATL, adult T‐cell leukemia; DSS, dextran sodium sulphate; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; IR, ionizing radiation; MS, multiple sclerosis; MWS, Muckle–Wells syndrome; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; PD, Parkinson's disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.
In recent years, small molecules targeted at GSDMD also promise great results in preclinical disease models. GSDMD is the executor of pyroptosis and provide access for the release of proinflammatory cytokines. There is also evidence that activated GSDMD (NT‐GSDMD) can oligomerize and form pores in both cellular membrane and mitochondrial membrane, the latter result in dysfunction of mitochondria and production of mtROS. 252 The important role of GSDMD in pyroptosis and more possibilities of its function mechanism make it an attractive target for therapeutics. Known inhibitors of GSDMD include disulfiram, necrosulfonamide, dimethyl fumarate, and so on. 253 The defect of this strategy is that although blockade of GSDMD can inhibit the release of cytokines and cell membrane rupture, it cannot inhibit the maturation of IL‐1β and IL‐18.
As we have mentioned, blockade of NEK7 can lead to the downregulation of CASP1 activation and the release of IL‐1β, which indicates that we can use NEK7 as a therapeutic target for NLRP3 inflammasome‐related diseases. In fact, there already have been a few inhibitors targeting NEK7‐licensed NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Oridonin, which has been proved to block the NLRP3–NEK7 interfaces, can alleviate CASP1 activation and IL‐1β release caused by various NLRP3 agonist, such as LPS or ATP, as an important supplement to Oridonin's function mechanism on NF‐κB activation. 238
Recent studies aimed at elucidating the mechanism of tumor immune escape found that ESCRT proteins play an important role in the repair of cell membrane wound, therefore protect tumor cell from T cell attack. 254 Cytotoxic T lymphocytes and NK cells induce tumor cell death through FAS pathways and perforin. Cell death forms include necrosis, apoptosis, and pyroptosis. Earlier study has already demonstrated that granzyme A can cleave and activate GSDMB, a member of gasdermin protein family in a NLRP3‐dependent manner, then induce tumor cell pyroptosis and mediate tumor immunotherapy. 255 It is reasonable to hypothesize that ESCRT can regulate cell fate affected by gasdermin pores, being supported by a study demonstrating that ESCRT is capable of repairing the membrane pores and reduce the release of IL‐1β after GSDMD activation. 118 Together, ESCRT could allow effective targeting of NLRP3‐related inflammatory diseases.
Another strategy for prevention and alleviation of NLRP3‐related diseases is PTMs, which refer to any alteration in the amino acid sequence of the protein after its synthesis. PTMs mainly occur in the endoplasmic reticulum of the cell and continue in the Golgi bodies as well. As we have mentioned, before its priming, NLRP3 stays in an inactive state, partly due to various forms of PTMs including phosphorylation and ubiquitylation. For example, there are several conserved phosphorylation sites in NLRP3, and phosphorylation of LRR domain was proved to control activation of NLRP3. 256 Emerging evidence supports the fact that PTMs are also an important mechanism in the regulation of NLRP3 activation. It is worth noting that as there exists multiple forms of PTMs, the modification role it plays in the activation of inflammasomes can be either enhancement or inhibition. We are looking forward to more comprehensive studies in this field. There are now a handful of drugs targeting the ubiquitin system being approved by the US FDA, and further testing of their effects on NLRP3‐related diseases might be significant for development of targeting therapy.
5.4. AIM2 targeting strategies
In recent years, research on AIM2 inflammasome has attracted great attention. One basic strategy to target the AIM2 inflammasome pathway is to block the interaction between dsDNA and AIM2 inflammasome. It was demonstrated that synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) containing TTAGGG motif can attenuate a variety of inflammatory responses and function through cytosolic nucleic acid‐sensing pathways. 257 Scientists pretreated DCs and macrophages with ODN‐A151, an ssDNA species composed of four repeats of TTAGGG motif, and they observed abrogation of caspase‐1‐dependent IL‐1β and IL‐18 maturation after stimulation with dsDNA poly(dA:dT) and CMV. Next they lysed immortalized murine macrophages and incubated them with A151 without stimuli, revealing that A151 can interact with AIM2 competitively with dsDNA and achieve the goal of AIM2 activation inhibition. 257
Although research focused on AIM2‐targeted therapies have been attractive in recent years, small molecules for AIM2‐specific inhibition have not been reported. Yet there are still some chemical compounds demonstrated to have inhibitory effects on AIM2, most of which are from natural origins, providing evidence for development of AIM2‐specific inhibitory drugs. Radiation therapy are commonly used in the treatment for patients suffering from cancer. Due to the damage of radiation to variety of cells and organs, among which lung and gastrointestinal tract are the most sensitive, applications of radiation therapy are greatly limited. Radiation‐induced lung injury (RILI) is a severe complication of radiotherapy for thoracic tumors. The progression of RILI can be divided into the acute radiation pneumonitis and radiation‐induced lung fibrosis in the late stage, both being related to the onset of inflammatory responses. Emerging evidence suggests that AIM2 inflammasome‐induced pyroptosis in ECs and macrophages plays a role in the inflammatory responses in RILI. 258 Andrographolide is an active component with antibacterial, anti‐inflammatory and anticancer effects and was demonstrated to contributes to amelioration of RILI. Mice were first exposed to 18 Gy radiation and then treated with Andrographolide. Results demonstrated that Andrographolide can alleviate inflammatory lung damage caused by radiation, and can therefore be identified as a novel potential protective agent for RILI. 259 Emerging evidence also supports the critical role of AIM2 inflammasome in ischemic brain damage, for instance, ischemic stroke. 260 Histone deacetylases 3 (HDAC3) has antitumor efficacy in various cancers through histone modification of p53 and Bax and is reported to mediate inflammatory response and LPS tolerance in human macrophages and monocytes. 261 RGFP966, a selective HDAC3 inhibitor, can cross the blood–brain barrier. 262 Scientists generated AIM2 knockout mice and administrated RGFP966 intraperitoneally at 10 mg/kg after ischemic stroke injury. It was then demonstrated that RGFP966 can on the one hand decrease inflammasome expression in both in vivo and in vitro experiments, and on the other hand have protective effects on ischemic stroke. Further experiment suggested that RGFP966 treatment does not have protective effects on AIM2−/− mice, together we can draw the conclusion that RGFP966 can alleviate ischemic brain injury through regulation of AIM2 expression. 263 Besides, fructose‐arginine, a nonsaponin molecule of Korean Red Ginseng extract has also been reported to have positive effects in diseases associated with AIM2 activation for its being able to attenuate AIM2 activation in both animal models and cultured cells. 264
6. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
In this review, we first give a brief introduction of the activation process of NLPR3, AIM2, and NLRC4 inflammasomes. Growing evidence supports the inference that inflammasomes can be activated by a broad spectrum of stimuli through several different pathways. Contrary to previous thought that inflammasomes rely only on caspase‐1 in caspase family proteins and will inevitably lead to cell pyroptosis, it has been demonstrated that caspase‐4/5/11 characterize noncanonical inflammasome activation pathway 30 , 31 and that TLR4–TRIF–RIPK1–FADD–CASP8 signaling pathway also contributes to the collective response of inflammasomes to danger signals. 36 Diverse cell fates as the result of inflammasome activation also indicate the necessity of precise regulation of inflammasome in the treatment of related diseases.
For the structure analysis of inflammasomes, advances emerged in recent years toward two major challenges in this field, purification of proteins and technologies to analyze three‐dimensional structure of them. Details of the inflammasome structure in both inactive and active states extend our understanding of the specific functions of different domains and motifs. For NLRP3, especially, cryo‐EM revealed the double‐ring cages structure of inactive mouse NLRP3, the decamer‐oligomer structure of human full‐length NLRP3 and the 10/11 fold disk structure with coexpression of NEK7 and NLRP3 jointly provide us with insight into the accurate binding cite and working mechanism of MCC950, the NLRP3‐specific inhibitor. 62 , 63 , 64
Inflammasome as an important part of innate immunity, is proved to act as a bridge between innate and adaptive immunity for indirect function through proinflammatory cytokines and direct function to regulate the development of lymphocytes. 101 The basic function of inflammasome can be briefly summarized as IL‐1β and IL‐18 release and cell pyroptosis, while other distinct cell fates are also involved in the protection and injury mechanisms. In recent years, the status of inflammasome in TAI attracted great attention, as it has been proved to play a dual role in the pathogenesis of cancers. 120 In fact, combination of CAR‐T therapy and regulation of inflammasome in cancer treatment are proved to ensure and strengthen antitumor effects of the treatment. 265
Therapeutic targets of inflammasome‐related diseases evolved with extended understanding of inflammasome activation, structure and biological functions. In this review, we give a retrospection of proinflammatory cytokine targeted therapeutics and the advances in MCC950 application and the development of other small molecules and chemical compounds that promised great results in disease models. We also highlight the prospect to target other proteins in inflammasome pathway including gasdermin family proteins and the ESCRT system for membrane repairment. In addition, application of nanomaterial and ncRNA may possess a certain value.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Yali Dai, Jing Zhou, and Chunmeng Shi contributed to the discussion of the outline and content of this review and edited the manuscript before submission. Yali Dai drafted the manuscript and illustrated the figures. All authors have read the manuscript before submission and approved the final version of this manuscript.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
ETHICS STATEMENT
No ethical approval was required for this study.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030056). The diagram of cells in BioRender was used as references in Figure 5.
Dai Y, Zhou J, Shi C. Inflammasome: structure, biological functions, and therapeutic targets. MedComm. 2023;4:e391. 10.1002/mco2.391
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Not applicable.
REFERENCES
- 1. Broz P, Pelegrín P, Shao F. The gasdermins, a protein family executing cell death and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(3):143‐157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zhivaki D, Borriello F, Chow OA, et al. Inflammasomes within hyperactive murine dendritic cells stimulate long‐lived T cell‐mediated anti‐tumor immunity. Cell Rep. 2020;33(7):108381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hatscher L, Amon L, Heger L, Dudziak D. Inflammasomes in dendritic cells: friend or foe? Immunol Lett. 2021;234:16‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Mariathasan S, Monack DM. Inflammasome adaptors and sensors: intracellular regulators of infection and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(1):31‐40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Henry T, Brotcke A, Weiss DS, Thompson LJ, Monack DM. Type I interferon signaling is required for activation of the inflammasome during Francisella infection. J Exp Med. 2007;204(5):987‐994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Akhter A, Gavrilin MA, Frantz L, et al. Caspase‐7 activation by the Nlrc4/Ipaf inflammasome restricts legionella pneumophila infection. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(4):e1000361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kerur N, Veettil MV, Sharma‐Walia N, et al. IFI16 acts as a nuclear pathogen sensor to induce the inflammasome in response to kaposi sarcoma‐associated herpesvirus infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;9(5):363‐375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Allen IC, TeKippe EM, Woodford RMT, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome functions as a negative regulator of tumorigenesis during colitis‐associated cancer. J Exp Med. 2010;207(5):1045‐1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ungerbäck J, Belenki D, Jawad ul‐Hassan A, et al. Genetic variation and alterations of genes involved in NFκB/TNFAIP3‐ and NLRP3‐inflammasome signaling affect susceptibility and outcome of colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(11):2126‐2134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Nunes T, de Souza HS. Inflammasome in intestinal inflammation and cancer. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:1‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pedicino D, Giglio A, Ruggio A, et al. Inflammasome, T lymphocytes and innate‐adaptive immunity crosstalk: role in cardiovascular disease and therapeutic perspectives. Thromb Haemost. 2018;118(08):1352‐1369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Abbate A, Toldo S, Marchetti C, Kron J, Van Tassell BW, Dinarello CA. Interleukin‐1 and the inflammasome as therapeutic targets in cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2020;126(9):1260‐1280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Du L, Wang X, Chen S, Guo X. The AIM2 inflammasome: a novel biomarker and target in cardiovascular disease. Pharmacol Res. 2022;186:106533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Karakas M, Haase T, Zeller T. Linking the sympathetic nervous system to the inflammasome: towards new therapeutics for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(1):70‐72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. He Y, Hara H, Núñez G. Mechanism and regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41(12):1012‐1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lin KM, Hu W, Troutman TD, et al. IRAK‐1 bypasses priming and directly links TLRs to rapid NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(2):775‐780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Xing Y, Yao X, Li H, et al. Cutting edge: tRAF6 mediates TLR/IL‐1R signaling–induced nontranscriptional priming of the NLRP3 inflammasome. J Immunol. 2017;199(5):1561‐1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Song N, Liu ZS, Xue W, et al. NLRP3 phosphorylation is an essential priming event for inflammasome activation. Mol Cell. 2017;68(1):185‐197. e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Py BF, Kim MS, Vakifahmetoglu‐Norberg H, Yuan J. Deubiquitination of NLRP3 by BRCC3 critically regulates inflammasome activity. Mol Cell. 2013;49(2):331‐338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Muñoz‐Planillo R, Kuffa P, Martínez‐Colón G, Smith BL, Rajendiran TM, Núñez G. K+ efflux is the common trigger of nlrp3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity. 2013;38(6):1142‐1153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Murakami T, Ockinger J, Yu J, et al. Critical role for calcium mobilization in activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(28):11282‐11287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tang T, Lang X, Xu C, et al. CLICs‐dependent chloride efflux is an essential and proximal upstream event for NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhou R, Yazdi AS, Menu P, Tschopp J. A role for mitochondria in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. 2011;469(7329):221‐225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wen H, Gris D, Lei Y, et al. Fatty acid–induced NLRP3‐ASC inflammasome activation interferes with insulin signaling. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(5):408‐415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mariathasan S, Weiss DS, Newton K, et al. Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature. 2006;440(7081):228‐232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gross O, Poeck H, Bscheider M, et al. Syk kinase signalling couples to the Nlrp3 inflammasome for anti‐fungal host defence. Nature. 2009;459(7245):433‐436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Muruve DA, Pétrilli V, Zaiss AK, et al. The inflammasome recognizes cytosolic microbial and host DNA and triggers an innate immune response. Nature. 2008;452(7183):103‐107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Halle A, Hornung V, Petzold GC, et al. The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in the innate immune response to amyloid‐β. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(8):857‐865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rodgers MA, Bowman JW, Fujita H, et al. The linear ubiquitin assembly complex (LUBAC) is essential for NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J Exp Med. 2014;211(7):1333‐1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Kayagaki N, Warming S, Lamkanfi M, et al. Non‐canonical inflammasome activation targets caspase‐11. Nature. 2011;479(7371):117‐121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Casson CN, Yu J, Reyes VM, et al. Human caspase‐4 mediates noncanonical inflammasome activation against gram‐negative bacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(21):6688‐6693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang Y, et al. Inflammatory caspases are innate immune receptors for intracellular LPS. Nature. 2014;514(7521):187‐192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Rühl S, Broz P. Caspase‐11 activates a canonical NLRP3 inflammasome by promoting K + efflux. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45(10):2927‐2936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zanoni I, Tan Y, Di Gioia M, et al. An endogenous caspase‐11 ligand elicits interleukin‐1 release from living dendritic cells. Science. 2016;352(6290):1232‐1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zhu F, The orphan receptor Nur77 binds cytoplasmic LPS to activate the non‐canonical NLRP3 inflammasome. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 36. Gaidt MM, Ebert TS, Chauhan D, et al. Human monocytes engage an alternative inflammasome pathway. Immunity. 2016;44(4):833‐846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Gong T, Zhou R. ApoC3: an ‘alarmin’ triggering sterile inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(1):9‐11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zewinger S, Reiser J, Jankowski V, et al. Apolipoprotein C3 induces inflammation and organ damage by alternative inflammasome activation. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(1):30‐41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Newton K, Wickliffe KE, Maltzman A, et al. Activity of caspase‐8 determines plasticity between cell death pathways. Nature. 2019;575(7784):679‐682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Chen J, Chen ZJ. PtdIns4P on dispersed trans‐Golgi network mediates NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. 2018;564(7734):71‐76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zhang Z, Venditti R, Ran L, et al. Distinct changes in endosomal composition promote NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nat Immunol. 2023;24(1):30‐41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Shi H, Wang Y, Li X, et al. NLRP3 activation and mitosis are mutually exclusive events coordinated by NEK7, a new inflammasome component. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(3):250‐258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. He Y, Zeng MY, Yang D, Motro B, Núñez G. NEK7 is an essential mediator of NLRP3 activation downstream of potassium efflux. Nature. 2016;530(7590):354‐357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Bürckstümmer T, Baumann C, Blüml S, et al. An orthogonal proteomic‐genomic screen identifies AIM2 as a cytoplasmic DNA sensor for the inflammasome. Nat Immunol. 2009;10(3):266‐272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Fernandes‐Alnemri T, Yu JW, Datta P, Wu J, Alnemri ES. AIM2 activates the inflammasome and cell death in response to cytoplasmic DNA. Nature. 2009;458(7237):509‐513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lee S, Karki R, Wang Y, Nguyen LN, Kalathur RC, Kanneganti TD. AIM2 forms a complex with pyrin and ZBP1 to drive PANoptosis and host defence. Nature. 2021;597(7876):415‐419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Man SM, Karki R, Kanneganti TD. AIM2 inflammasome in infection, cancer, and autoimmunity: role in DNA sensing, inflammation, and innate immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46(2):269‐280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zhu W, Zu X, Liu S, Zhang H. The absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) inflammasome in microbial infection. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;495:100‐108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Man SM, Karki R, Malireddi RKS, et al. The transcription factor IRF1 and guanylate‐binding proteins target activation of the AIM2 inflammasome by Francisella infection. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(5):467‐475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Meunier E, Wallet P, Dreier RF, et al. Guanylate‐binding proteins promote activation of the AIM2 inflammasome during infection with Francisella novicida. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(5):476‐484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Romanish MT, Nakamura H, Lai CB, Wang Y, Mager DL. A novel protein isoform of the multicopy human NAIP gene derives from intragenic Alu SINE promoters. PLoS One. 2009;4(6):e5761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Matusiak M, Van Opdenbosch N, Vande Walle L, Sirard JC, Kanneganti TD, Lamkanfi M. Flagellin‐induced NLRC4 phosphorylation primes the inflammasome for activation by NAIP5. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(5):1541‐1546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Suzuki S, Franchi L, He Y, et al. Shigella type III secretion protein MxiI is recognized by Naip2 to induce Nlrc4 inflammasome activation independently of Pkcδ. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(2):e1003926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Kay C, Wang R, Kirkby M, Man SM. Molecular mechanisms activating the NAIP‐NLRC4 inflammasome: implications in infectious disease, autoinflammation, and cancer. Immunol Rev. 2020;297(1):67‐82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Miao EA, Alpuche‐Aranda CM, Dors M, et al. Cytoplasmic flagellin activates caspase‐1 and secretion of interleukin 1β via Ipaf. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(6):569‐575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Akhade AS, Atif SM, Lakshmi BS, et al. Type 1 interferon‐dependent repression of NLRC4 and iPLA2 licenses down‐regulation of Salmonella flagellin inside macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(47):29811‐29822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Yang J, Zhao Y, Shi J, Shao F. Human NAIP and mouse NAIP1 recognize bacterial type III secretion needle protein for inflammasome activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(35):14408‐14413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Kortmann J, Brubaker SW, Monack DM. Cutting edge: inflammasome activation in primary human macrophages is dependent on flagellin. J Immunol. 2015;195(3):815‐819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Zhang P, Liu Y, Hu L, et al. NLRC4 inflammasome–dependent cell death occurs by a complementary series of three death pathways and determines lethality in mice. Sci Adv. 2021;7(43):eabi9471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sharif H, Wang L, Wang WL, et al. Structural mechanism for NEK7‐licensed activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2019;570(7761):338‐343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Bae JY, Park HH. Crystal structure of NALP3 protein pyrin domain (PYD) and its implications in inflammasome assembly. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(45):39528‐39536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Andreeva L, David L, Rawson S, et al. NLRP3 cages revealed by full‐length mouse NLRP3 structure control pathway activation. Cell. 2021;184(26):6299‐6312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Hochheiser IV, Pilsl M, Hagelueken G, et al. Structure of the NLRP3 decamer bound to the cytokine release inhibitor CRID3. Nature. 2022;604(7904):184‐189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Xiao L, Magupalli VG, Wu H. Cryo‐EM structures of the active NLRP3 inflammasome disk. Nature. 2023;613(7944):595‐600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Rathinam VAK, Jiang Z, Waggoner SN, et al. The AIM2 inflammasome is essential for host defense against cytosolic bacteria and DNA viruses. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(5):395‐402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Lu A, Kabaleeswaran V, Fu T, Magupalli VG, Wu H. Crystal structure of the F27G AIM2 PYD mutant and similarities of its self‐association to DED/DED interactions. J Mol Biol. 2014;426(7):1420‐1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Jin T, Perry A, Smith P, Jiang J, Xiao TS. Structure of the absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) pyrin domain provides insights into the mechanisms of AIM2 autoinhibition and inflammasome assembly. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(19):13225‐13235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Kersse K, Verspurten J, Berghe TV, Vandenabeele P. The death‐fold superfamily of homotypic interaction motifs. Trends Biochem Sci. 2011;36(10):541‐552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Yuan RT, Young S, Liang J, Schmid MC, Mielgo A, Stupack DG. Caspase‐8 isoform 6 promotes death effector filament formation independent of microtubules. Apoptosis. 2012;17(3):229‐235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Jin T, Perry A, Jiang J, et al. Structures of the HIN domain:DNA complexes reveal ligand binding and activation mechanisms of the AIM2 inflammasome and IFI16 receptor. Immunity. 2012;36(4):561‐571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Shaw N, Liu ZJ. Role of the HIN domain in regulation of innate immune responses. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34(1):2‐15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Morrone SR, Matyszewski M, Yu X, Delannoy M, Egelman EH, Sohn J. Assembly‐driven activation of the AIM2 foreign‐dsDNA sensor provides a polymerization template for downstream ASC. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):7827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Hu Z, Yan C, Liu P, et al. Crystal structure of NLRC4 reveals its autoinhibition mechanism. Science. 2013;341(6142):172‐175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Kofoed EM, Vance RE. Innate immune recognition of bacterial ligands by NAIPs determines inflammasome specificity. Nature. 2011;477(7366):592‐595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Zhang L, Chen S, Ruan J, et al. Cryo‐EM structure of the activated NAIP2‐NLRC4 inflammasome reveals nucleated polymerization. Science. 2015;350(6259):404‐409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Reubold TF, Wohlgemuth S, Eschenburg S. A new model for the transition of APAF‐1 from inactive monomer to caspase‐activating apoptosome. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(47):32717‐32724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Tenthorey JL, Haloupek N, López‐Blanco JR, et al. The structural basis of flagellin detection by NAIP5: a strategy to limit pathogen immune evasion. Science. 2017;358(6365):888‐893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Yang X, Yang F, Wang W, et al. Structural basis for specific flagellin recognition by the NLR protein NAIP5. Cell Res. 2018;28(1):35‐47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Consortiu TheInternational. Ancient missense mutations in a new member of the roret gene family are likely to cause familial Mediterranean fever. Cell. 1997;90(4):797‐807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Broz P, Dixit VM. Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(7):407‐420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Seshadri S, Duncan MD, Hart JM, Gavrilin MA, Wewers MD. Pyrin levels in human monocytes and monocyte‐derived macrophages regulate IL‐1β processing and release. J Immunol. 2007;179(2):1274‐1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Centola M, Wood G, Frucht DM, et al. The gene for familial Mediterranean fever, MEFV, is expressed in early leukocyte development and is regulated in response to inflammatory mediators. 2000;95(10). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Gavrilin MA, Mitra S, Seshadri S, et al. Pyrin critical to macrophage IL‐1β response to Francisella challenge. J Immunol. 2009;182(12):7982‐7989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Tidow N, Chen X, Müller C, et al. Hematopoietic‐specific expression of MEFV, the gene mutated in familial Mediterranean fever, and subcellular localization of its corresponding protein, pyrin. Blood. 2000;95(4):1451‐1455. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Ozato K, Shin DM, Chang TH, Morse HC. TRIM family proteins and their emerging roles in innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(11):849‐860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Yu JW, Fernandes‐Alnemri T, Datta P, et al. Pyrin activates the ASC pyroptosome in response to engagement by autoinflammatory PSTPIP1 mutants. Mol Cell. 2007;28(2):214‐227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Papin S, Cuenin S, Agostini L, Martinon F, Werner S, Beer HD. The SPRY domain of Pyrin, mutated in familial Mediterranean fever patients, interacts with inflammasome components and inhibits proIL‐1b processing. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14(8):1457‐1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Chae JJ, Wood G, Masters SL, et al. The B30.2 domain of pyrin, the familial Mediterranean fever protein, interacts directly with caspase‐1 to modulate IL‐1beta production. Med Sci. 2006;103(26):9982‐9987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Dick MS, Sborgi L, Rühl S, Hiller S, Broz P. ASC filament formation serves as a signal amplification mechanism for inflammasomes. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):11929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Sahillioglu AC, Sumbul F, Ozoren N, Haliloglu T. Structural and dynamics aspects of ASC speck assembly. Structure. 2014;22(12):1722‐1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. de Alba E. Structure and interdomain dynamics of apoptosis‐associated speck‐like protein containing a CARD (ASC). J Biol Chem. 2009;284(47):32932‐32941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Bryan NB, Dorfleutner A, Rojanasakul Y, Stehlik C. Activation of inflammasomes requires intracellular redistribution of the apoptotic speck‐like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain. J Immunol. 2009;182(5):3173‐3182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Proell M, Gerlic M, Mace PD, Reed JC, Riedl SJ. The CARD plays a critical role in ASC foci formation and inflammasome signalling. Biochem J. 2013;449(3):613‐621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Masumoto J, Taniguchi S, Ayukawa K, et al. ASC, a novel 22‐kDa protein, aggregates during apoptosis of human promyelocytic leukemia HL‐60 cells. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(48):33835‐33838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Sborgi L, Ravotti F, Dandey VP, et al. Structure and assembly of the mouse ASC inflammasome by combined NMR spectroscopy and cryo‐electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(43):13237‐13242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Lu A, Magupalli VG, Ruan J, et al. Unified polymerization mechanism for the assembly of ASC‐dependent inflammasomes. Cell. 2014;156(6):1193‐1206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Nuñez G, Benedict MA, Hu Y, Inohara N. Caspases: the proteases of the apoptotic pathway. Oncogene. 1998;17(25):3237‐3245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Lu A, Li Y, Schmidt FI, et al. Molecular basis of caspase‐1 polymerization and its inhibition by a new capping mechanism. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23(5):416‐425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Fritz JH, Le Bourhis L, Magalhaes JG, Philpott DJ. Innate immune recognition at the epithelial barrier drives adaptive immunity: aPCs take the back seat. Trends Immunol. 2008;29(1):41‐49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Takeuchi O, Akira S. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell. 2010;140(6):805‐820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Hsu ML, Zouali M. Inflammasome is a central player in B cell development and homing. Life Sci Alliance. 2023;6(2):e202201700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. McGilligan VE, Gregory‐Ksander MS, Li D, et al. Staphylococcus aureus activates the NLRP3 inflammasome in human and rat conjunctival goblet cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Dinarello CA. Overview of the IL‐1 family in innate inflammation and acquired immunity. Immunol Rev. 2018;281(1):8‐27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Brennan MA, Cookson BT. Salmonella induces macrophage death by caspase‐1‐dependent necrosis. Mol Microbiol. 2000;38(1):31‐40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Wei Y, Yang L, Pandeya A, Cui J, Zhang Y, Li Z. Pyroptosis‐Induced inflammation and tissue damage. J Mol Biol. 2022;434(4):167301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Mandal P, Feng Y, Lyons JD, et al. Caspase‐8 collaborates with caspase‐11 to drive tissue damage and execution of endotoxic shock. Immunity. 2018;49(1):42‐55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Linkermann A, Stockwell BR, Krautwald S, Anders HJ. Regulated cell death and inflammation: an auto‐amplification loop causes organ failure. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(11):759‐767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Deng M, Tang Y, Li W, et al. The endotoxin delivery protein HMGB1 mediates caspase‐11‐dependent lethality in sepsis. Immunity. 2018;49(4):740‐753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Fang R, Tsuchiya K, Kawamura I, et al. Critical roles of ASC inflammasomes in caspase‐1 activation and host innate resistance to Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. J Immunol. 2011;187(9):4890‐4899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Hu GQ, Song PX, Li N, et al. AIM2 contributes to the maintenance of intestinal integrity via Akt and protects against Salmonella mucosal infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;9(5):1330‐1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Karmakar M, Katsnelson MA, Dubyak GR, Pearlman E. Neutrophil P2×7 receptors mediate NLRP3 inflammasome‐dependent IL‐1β secretion in response to ATP. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):10555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Zhivaki D, Kagan JC. NLRP3 inflammasomes that induce antitumor immunity. Trends Immunol. 2021;42(7):575‐589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Yao X, Zhang C, Xing Y, et al. Remodelling of the gut microbiota by hyperactive NLRP3 induces regulatory T cells to maintain homeostasis. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Chen KW, Groß CJ, Sotomayor FV, et al. The neutrophil NLRC4 inflammasome selectively promotes IL‐1β maturation without pyroptosis during acute Salmonella challenge. Cell Rep. 2014;8(2):570‐582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Wolf AJ, Reyes CN, Liang W, et al. Hexokinase is an innate immune receptor for the detection of bacterial peptidoglycan. Cell. 2016;166(3):624‐636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Evavold CL, Ruan J, Tan Y, Xia S, Wu H, Kagan JC. The pore‐forming protein gasdermin d regulates interleukin‐1 secretion from living macrophages. Immunity. 2018;48(1):35‐44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Zanoni I, Tan Y, Di Gioia M, Springstead JR, Kagan JC. By capturing inflammatory lipids released from dying cells, the receptor CD14 induces inflammasome‐dependent phagocyte hyperactivation. Immunity. 2017;47(4):697‐709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Rühl S, Shkarina K, Demarco B, Heilig R, Santos JC, Broz P. ESCRT‐dependent membrane repair negatively regulates pyroptosis downstream of GSDMD activation. Science. 2018;362(6417):956‐960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Zhao H, Wu L, Yan G, et al. Inflammation and tumor progression: signaling pathways and targeted intervention. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Sharma BR, Kanneganti TD. NLRP3 inflammasome in cancer and metabolic diseases. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(5):550‐559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Guo B, Fu S, Zhang J, Liu B, Li Z. Targeting inflammasome/IL‐1 pathways for cancer immunotherapy. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):36107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Kepp O, Zitvogel L. Immunogenic cell death in cancer therapy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31(1):51‐72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Ben‐Sasson SZ, Hogg A, Hu‐Li J, et al. IL‐1 enhances expansion, effector function, tissue localization, and memory response of antigen‐specific CD8 T cells. J Exp Med. 2013;210(3):491‐502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Ben‐Sasson SZ, Wang K, Cohen J, Paul WE. IL‐1 strikingly enhances antigen‐driven CD4 and CD8 T‐cell responses. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2013;78(0):117‐124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Mempel TR, Henrickson SE, von Andrian UH. T‐cell priming by dendritic cells in lymph nodes occurs in three distinct phases. Nature. 2004;427(6970):154‐159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Huang Y, Wang H, Hao Y, et al. Myeloid PTEN promotes chemotherapy‐induced NLRP3‐inflammasome activation and antitumour immunity. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22(6):716‐727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Tesniere A, Schlemmer F, Boige V, et al. Immunogenic death of colon cancer cells treated with oxaliplatin. Oncogene. 2010;29(4):482‐491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Casares N, Pequignot MO, Tesniere A, et al. Caspase‐dependent immunogenicity of doxorubicin‐induced tumor cell death. J Exp Med. 2005;202(12):1691‐1701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Ghiringhelli F, Apetoh L, Tesniere A, et al. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in dendritic cells induces IL‐1β–dependent adaptive immunity against tumors. Nat Med. 2009;15(10):1170‐1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. George S, Miao D, Demetri GD, et al. Loss of PTEN is associated with resistance to anti‐PD‐1 checkpoint blockade therapy in metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. Immunity. 2017;46(2):197‐204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Peng W, Chen JQ, Liu C, et al. Loss of PTEN promotes resistance to T cell–mediated immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(2):202‐216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Hildebrandt MAT, Yang H, Hung MC, et al. Genetic variations in the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway are associated with clinical outcomes in esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(6):857‐871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Kumar B, Cashman SM, Kumar‐Singh R. Complement‐mediated activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and its inhibition by AAV‐mediated delivery of CD59 in a model of uveitis. Mol Ther. 2018;26(6):1568‐1580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Meng J, Li N, Liu X, et al. nlrp3 attenuates intraocular inflammation by inhibiting aim2‐m ediated pyroptosis through the phosphorylated salt‐inducible kinase 1/sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 pathway. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75(5):842‐855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Accogli T, Hibos C, Vegran F. Canonical and non‐canonical functions of NLRP3. J Adv Res. 2023:S2090123223000012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Kim JJ, Jo EK. NLRP3 inflammasome and host protection against bacterial infection. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(10):1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Sarvestani ST, McAuley JL. The role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in regulation of antiviral responses to influenza A virus infection. Antiviral Res. 2017;148:32‐42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Zheng M, Kanneganti T. The regulation of the ZBP1‐NLRP3 inflammasome and its implications in pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). Immunol Rev. 2020;297(1):26‐38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Shen HH, Yang YX, Meng X, et al. NLRP3: a promising therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17(7):694‐702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Choulaki C, Papadaki G, Repa A, et al. Enhanced activity of NLRP3 inflammasome in peripheral blood cells of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Ruscitti P, Cipriani P, Di Benedetto P, et al. Monocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and type 2 diabetes mellitus display an increased production of interleukin (IL)‐1 β via the nucleotide‐binding domain and leucine‐rich repeat containing family pyrin 3(NLRP3)‐inflammasome activation: a possible implication for therapeutic decision in these patients. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;182(1):35‐44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Jenko B, Praprotnik S, Tomšić M, Dolžan V. NLRP3 and CARD8 polymorphisms influence higher disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Med Biochem. 2016;35(3):319‐323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Chen L, Huang CF, Li YC, et al. Blockage of the NLRP3 inflammasome by MCC950 improves anti‐tumor immune responses in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75(11):2045‐2058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Mónaco A, Chilibroste S, Yim L, Chabalgoity JA, Moreno M. Inflammasome activation, NLRP3 engagement and macrophage recruitment to tumor microenvironment are all required for Salmonella antitumor effect. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022;71(9):2141‐2150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Maruzuru Y, Ichinohe T, Sato R, et al. Herpes simplex virus 1 VP22 inhibits AIM2‐dependent inflammasome activation to enable efficient viral replication. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(2):254‐265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Ekchariyawat P, Hamel R, Bernard E, et al. Inflammasome signaling pathways exert antiviral effect against Chikungunya virus in human dermal fibroblasts. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;32:401‐408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Jakobs C, Perner S, Hornung V. AIM2 drives joint inflammation in a self‐DNA triggered model of chronic polyarthritis. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0131702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Wu H, Deng Y, Long D, et al. The IL‐21‐TET2‐AIM2‐c‐MAF pathway drives the T follicular helper cell response in lupus‐like disease. Clin Transl Med. 2022;12(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Franchi L, Amer A, Body‐Malapel M, et al. Cytosolic flagellin requires Ipaf for activation of caspase‐1 and interleukin 1β in salmonella‐infected macrophages. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(6):576‐582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Cai S, Batra S, Wakamatsu N, Pacher P, Jeyaseelan S. NLRC4 inflammasome‐mediated production of IL‐1β modulates mucosal immunity in the lung against gram‐negative bacterial infection. J Immunol. 2012;188(11):5623‐5635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Nordlander S, Pott J, Maloy KJ. NLRC4 expression in intestinal epithelial cells mediates protection against an enteric pathogen. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7(4):775‐785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Semper RP, Vieth M, Gerhard M, Mejías‐Luque R. Helicobacter pylori exploits the NLRC4 inflammasome to dampen host defenses. J Immunol. 2019;203(8):2183‐2193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Wen J, Xuan B, Liu Y, et al. Updating the NLRC4 inflammasome: from bacterial infections to autoimmunity and cancer. Front Immunol. 2021;12:702527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Kolb R, Phan L, Borcherding N, et al. Obesity‐associated NLRC4 inflammasome activation drives breast cancer progression. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):13007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Jin H, Kim HJ. NLRC4, ASC and caspase‐1 are inflammasome components that are mediated by P2Y2R activation in breast cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(9):3337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Puth S, Verma V, Hong SH, Tan W, Lee SE, Rhee JH. An all‐in‐one adjuvanted therapeutic cancer vaccine targeting dendritic cell cytosol induces long‐lived tumor suppression through NLRC4 inflammasome activation. Biomaterials. 2022;286:121542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Canna SW, de Jesus AA, Gouni S, et al. An activating NLRC4 inflammasome mutation causes autoinflammation with recurrent macrophage activation syndrome. Nat Genet. 2014;46(10):1140‐1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Hu B, Elinav E, Huber S, et al. Inflammation‐induced tumorigenesis in the colon is regulated by caspase‐1 and NLRC4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(50):21635‐21640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Carvalho FA, Nalbantoglu I, Aitken JD, et al. Cytosolic flagellin receptor NLRC4 protects mice against mucosal and systemic challenges. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5(3):288‐298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Christgen S, Zheng M, Kesavardhana S, et al. Identification of the PANoptosome: a molecular platform triggering pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis (PANoptosis). Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Ozen S, Demirkaya E, Erer B, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of familial Mediterranean fever. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(4):644‐651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Ben‐Zvi I, Livneh A, Colchicine failure in familial mediterranean fever and potential alternatives: embarking on the Anakinra trial. Isr Med Assoc J. 2014;16(5):271–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Hesker PR, Nguyen M, Kovarova M, Ting JPY, Koller BH. Genetic loss of murine pyrin, the familial mediterranean fever protein, increases interleukin‐1β levels. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e51105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Chae JJ, Cho YH, Lee GS, et al. Gain‐of‐function pyrin mutations induce NLRP3 protein‐independent interleukin‐1β activation and severe autoinflammation in mice. Immunity. 2011;34(5):755‐768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Xu H, Yang J, Gao W, et al. Innate immune sensing of bacterial modifications of Rho GTPases by the Pyrin inflammasome. Nature. 2014;513(7517):237‐241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Lagrange B, Benaoudia S, Wallet P, et al. Human caspase‐4 detects tetra‐acylated LPS and cytosolic Francisella and functions differently from murine caspase‐11. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Santos JC, Boucher D, Schneider LK, et al. Human GBP1 binds LPS to initiate assembly of a caspase‐4 activating platform on cytosolic bacteria. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Hagar JA, Powell DA, Aachoui Y, Ernst RK, Miao EA. Cytoplasmic LPS Activates Caspase‐11: implications in TLR4‐Independent Endotoxic Shock. Science. 2013;341(6151):1250‐1253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Vanaja SK, Russo AJ, Behl B, et al. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles mediate cytosolic localization of LPS and caspase‐11 activation. Cell. 2016;165(5):1106‐1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Cheng KT, Xiong S, Ye Z, et al. Caspase‐11–mediated endothelial pyroptosis underlies endotoxemia‐induced lung injury. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(11):4124‐4135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Chu LH, Indramohan M, Ratsimandresy RA, et al. The oxidized phospholipid oxPAPC protects from septic shock by targeting the non‐canonical inflammasome in macrophages. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Gerentes M, Pelissolo A, Rajagopal K, Tamouza R, Hamdani N. Obsessive‐compulsive disorder: autoimmunity and neuroinflammation. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21(8):78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Hisahara S, Yuan J, Momoi T, Okano H, Miura M. Caspase‐11 mediates oligodendrocyte cell death and pathogenesis of autoimmune‐mediated demyelination. J Exp Med. 2001;193(1):111‐122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Yen JH, Ganea D. Interferon β induces mature dendritic cell apoptosis through caspase‐11/caspase‐3 activation. Blood. 2009;114(7):1344‐1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Nishad R, Mukhi D, Tahaseen SV, Mungamuri SK, Pasupulati AK. Growth hormone induces Notch1 signaling in podocytes and contributes to proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy. J Biol Chem. 2019;294(44):16109‐16122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Dai H, Liu Q, Liu B. Research progress on mechanism of podocyte depletion in diabetic nephropathy. J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:1‐10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Liu M, Liang K, Zhen J, et al. Sirt6 deficiency exacerbates podocyte injury and proteinuria through targeting Notch signaling. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Cheng Q, Pan J, Zhou Z, et al. Caspase‐11/4 and gasdermin D‐mediated pyroptosis contributes to podocyte injury in mouse diabetic nephropathy. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021;42(6):954‐963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. He J, Yang Y, Peng DQ. Monosodium urate (MSU) crystals increase gout associated coronary heart disease (CHD) risk through the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Int J Cardiol. 2012;160(1):72‐73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Dinesh P, Rasool M. Berberine, an isoquinoline alkaloid suppresses TXNIP mediated NLRP3 inflammasome activation in MSU crystal stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages through the upregulation of Nrf2 transcription factor and alleviates MSU crystal induced inflammation in rats. Int Immunopharmacol. 2017;44:26‐37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Gu Y, Zhu Y, Deng G, Liu S, Sun Y, Lv W. Curcumin analogue AI‐44 alleviates MSU‐induced gouty arthritis in mice via inhibiting cathepsin B‐mediated NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;93:107375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. A structural approach to pathological crystallizations. Gout: the possible role of albumin in sodium urate crystallization. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988;235(1279):145‐159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. McGill NW, Dieppe PA. Evidence for a promoter of urate crystal formation in gouty synovial fluid. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50(8):558‐561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Caution K, Young N, Robledo‐Avila F, et al. Caspase‐11 mediates neutrophil chemotaxis and extracellular trap formation during acute gouty arthritis through alteration of cofilin phosphorylation. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Yi YS. Dual roles of the caspase‐11 non‐canonical inflammasome in inflammatory bowel disease. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022;108:108739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Márquez‐Flores YK, Villegas I, Cárdeno A, Rosillo MÁ, Alarcón‐de‐la‐Lastra C. Apigenin supplementation protects the development of dextran sulfate sodium‐induced murine experimental colitis by inhibiting canonical and non‐canonical inflammasome signaling pathways. J Nutr Biochem. 2016;30:143‐152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Chao L, Li Z, Zhou J, et al. Shen‐Ling‐Bai‐Zhu‐San improves dextran sodium sulfate‐induced colitis by inhibiting caspase‐1/caspase‐11‐mediated pyroptosis. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Demon D, Kuchmiy A, Fossoul A, Zhu Q, Kanneganti TD, Lamkanfi M. Caspase‐11 is expressed in the colonic mucosa and protects against dextran sodium sulfate‐induced colitis. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7(6):1480‐1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Oficjalska K, Raverdeau M, Aviello G, et al. Protective role for caspase‐11 during acute experimental murine colitis. J Immunol. 2015;194(3):1252‐1260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Williams TM, Leeth RA, Rothschild DE, et al. Caspase‐11 attenuates gastrointestinal inflammation and experimental colitis pathogenesis. Am J Physiol‐Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;308(2):G139‐G150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Lv N, Zhao Y, Liu X, et al. Dysfunctional telomeres through mitostress‐induced cGAS/STING activation to aggravate immune senescence and viral pneumonia. Aging Cell. 2022;21(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Xian H, Liu Y, et al. Metformin inhibition of mitochondrial ATP and DNA synthesis abrogates NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pulmonary inflammation. Immunity. 2021;54(7):1463‐1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193. Cheong WC, Kang HR, Yoon H, Kang SJ, Ting JPY, Song MJ. Influenza A virus NS1 protein inhibits the NLRP3 inflammasome. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Potere N, Del Buono MG, Caricchio R, et al. Interleukin‐1 and the NLRP3 inflammasome in COVID‐19: pathogenetic and therapeutic implications. eBioMedicine. 2022;85:104299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Barnett KC, Xie Y, Asakura T, et al. An epithelial‐immune circuit amplifies inflammasome and IL‐6 responses to SARS‐CoV‐2. Cell Host Microbe. 2023;31(2):243‐259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Karki R, Kanneganti TD. Diverging inflammasome signals in tumorigenesis and potential targeting. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(4):197‐214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Lust JA, Lacy MQ, Zeldenrust SR, et al. Reduction in C‐reactive protein indicates successful targeting of the IL‐1/IL‐6 axis resulting in improved survival in early stage multiple myeloma: targeting IL‐1 induced IL‐6 production. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(6):571‐574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Hickish T, Andre T, Wyrwicz L, et al. MABp1 as a novel antibody treatment for advanced colorectal cancer: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(2):192‐201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Klein AL, Imazio M, Cremer P, et al. Phase 3 trial of interleukin‐1 trap rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(1):31‐41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. Nanoparticles in the clinic: an update. Bioeng Transl Med. 2019;4(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Mitchell MJ, Billingsley MM, Haley RM, Wechsler ME, Peppas NA, Langer R. Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(2):101‐124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Li J, Gao X, Wang Y, Xia T, Zhao Y, Meng H. Precision design of engineered nanomaterials to guide immune systems for disease treatment. Matter. 2022;5(4):1162‐1191. [Google Scholar]
- 203. Perciani CT, Liu LY, Wood L, MacParland SA. Enhancing immunity with nanomedicine: employing nanoparticles to harness the immune system. ACS Nano. 2021;15(1):7‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Sun B, Wang X, Ji Z, Li R, Xia T. NLRP3 inflammasome activation induced by engineered nanomaterials. Small. 2013;9(9‐10):1595‐1607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Jin C, Frayssinet P, Pelker R, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of hydroxyapatite‐associated arthropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(36):14867‐14872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Morishige T, Yoshioka Y, Inakura H, et al. The effect of surface modification of amorphous silica particles on NLRP3 inflammasome mediated IL‐1β production, ROS production and endosomal rupture. Biomaterials. 2010;31(26):6833‐6842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. An L, Li Z, Shi L, et al. Inflammation‐targeted celastrol nanodrug attenuates collagen‐induced arthritis through NF‐κB and Notch1 pathways. Nano Lett. 2020;20(10):7728‐7736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Winkle M, El‐Daly SM, Fabbri M, Calin GA. Noncoding RNA therapeutics — challenges and potential solutions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(8):629‐651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Zhang P, Cao L, Zhou R, Yang X, Wu M. The lncRNA Neat1 promotes activation of inflammasomes in macrophages. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Sasaki YTF, Ideue T, Sano M, Mituyama T, Hirose T. MENε/β noncoding RNAs are essential for structural integrity of nuclear paraspeckles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:2525‐2530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Neudecker V, Haneklaus M, Jensen O, et al. Myeloid‐derived miR‐223 regulates intestinal inflammation via repression of the NLRP3 inflammasome. J Exp Med. 2017;214(6):1737‐1752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Brazil JC, Louis NA, Parkos CA. The role of polymorphonuclear leukocyte trafficking in the perpetuation of inflammation during inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013;19(7):1556‐1565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Nakanishi H, Kawashima Y, Kurima K, et al. NLRP3 mutation and cochlear autoinflammation cause syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss DFNA34 responsive to anakinra therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(37):E7766‐E7775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Lachmann HJ, Kuemmerle‐Deschner JB, Hachulla E, Widmer A, Patel N. Use of canakinumab in the cryopyrin‐associated periodic syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(23):2416‐2425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Terkeltaub R, Sundy JS, Schumacher HR, et al. The interleukin 1 inhibitor rilonacept in treatment of chronic gouty arthritis: results of a placebo‐controlled, monosequence crossover, non‐randomised, single‐blind pilot study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(10):1613‐1617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Coll RC, Hill JR, Day CJ, et al. MCC950 directly targets the NLRP3 ATP‐hydrolysis motif for inflammasome inhibition. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15(6):556‐559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Tapia‐Abellán A, Angosto‐Bazarra D, Martínez‐Banaclocha H, et al. MCC950 closes the active conformation of NLRP3 to an inactive state. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15(6):560‐564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Corcoran SE, Halai R, Cooper MA. Pharmacological inhibition of the nod‐like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammasome with MCC950. Pharmacol Rev. 2021;73(3):968‐1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Han S, He Z, Hu X, et al. Inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation by CY‐09 helps to restore cerebral glucose metabolism in 3×Tg‐AD mice. Antioxidants. 2023;12(3):722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Mori N. Bay 11–7082 inhibits transcription factor NF‐kappa B and induces apoptosis of HTLV‐I‐infected T‐cell lines and primary adult T‐cell leukemia cells. Blood. 2002;100(5):1828‐1834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Irrera N, Vaccaro M, Bitto A, et al. BAY 11–7082 inhibits the NF‐κB and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways and protects against IMQ‐induced psoriasis. Clin Sci. 2017;131(6):487‐498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222. Kumar A, Negi G, Sharma SS. Suppression of NF‐κB and NF‐κB regulated oxidative stress and neuroinflammation by BAY 11–7082 (IκB phosphorylation inhibitor) in experimental diabetic neuropathy. Biochimie. 2012;94(5):1158‐1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223. Kim YS, Kim JS, Kwon JS, et al. BAY 11–7082, a nuclear factor‐κB inhibitor, reduces inflammation and apoptosis in a rat cardiac ischemia‐reperfusion injury model. Int Heart J. 2010;51(5):348‐353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. Chinta PK, Tambe S, Umrani D, Pal AK, Nandave M. Effect of parthenolide, an NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, on insulin resistance in high‐fat diet‐obese mice. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2022;100(3):272‐281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225. Kim BH, Yoon BR, Kim EK, et al. Alleviation of collagen‐induced arthritis by the benzoxathiole derivative BOT‐4‐one in mice: implication of the Th1‐ and Th17‐cell‐mediated immune responses. Biochem Pharmacol. 2016;110–111:47‐57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226. Marchetti C, Swartzwelter B, Koenders MI, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor OLT1177 suppresses joint inflammation in murine models of acute arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(1):169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Sánchez‐Fernández A, Skouras DB, Dinarello CA, López‐Vales R. OLT1177 (Dapansutrile), a selective NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis pathogenesis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228. Saber S, Youssef ME, Sharaf H, et al. BBG enhances OLT1177‐induced NLRP3 inflammasome inactivation by targeting P2×7R/NLRP3 and MyD88/NF‐κB signaling in DSS‐induced colitis in rats. Life Sci. 2021;270:119123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Lunding LP, Skouras DB, Vock C, Dinarello CA, Wegmann M. The NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, OLT1177 ®, ameliorates experimental allergic asthma in mice. Allergy. 2022;77(3):1035‐1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Lonnemann N, Hosseini S, Marchetti C, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor OLT1177 rescues cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(50):32145‐32154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Zhao N, Li C, Di B, Xu L. Recent advances in the NEK7‐licensed NLRP3 inflammasome activation: mechanisms, role in diseases and related inhibitors. J Autoimmun. 2020;113:102515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Garot P, Lefèvre T, Savage M, et al. Nine‐month outcome of patients treated by percutaneous coronary interventions for bifurcation lesions in the recent era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(4):606‐612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. Chen S, Wang Y, Pan Y, et al. Novel role for tranilast in regulating NLRP3 ubiquitination, vascular inflammation, and atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(12):e015513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. Dagher D, Elmansi H, Nasr JJ, El‐Enany N. Utility of a novel turn‐off fluorescence probe for the determination of tranilast, an adjunctive drug for patients with severe COVID‐19. RSC Adv. 2022;12(34):22044‐22053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235. Cao J, Peng Q. NLRP3 inhibitor tranilast attenuates gestational diabetes mellitus in a genetic mouse model. Drugs RD. 2022;22(1):105‐112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236. Gao J, Li C, Wang X, et al. Oridonin attenuates lung inflammation and fibrosis in silicosis via covalent targeting iNOS. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153:113532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237. Lin J, Lai X, Fan X, et al. Oridonin protects against myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury by inhibiting GSDMD‐mediated pyroptosis. Genes. 2022;13(11):2133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238. Li M, Zhang Y, Qiu S, et al. Oridonin ameliorates noise‐induced hearing loss by blocking NLRP3 ‐ NEK7 mediated inflammasome activation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;95:107576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239. Yang H, Lv H, Li H, Ci X, Peng L. Oridonin protects LPS‐induced acute lung injury by modulating Nrf2‐mediated oxidative stress and Nrf2‐independent NLRP3 and NF‐κB pathways. Cell Commun Signal. 2019;17(1):62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240. Yang H, Huang J, Gao Y, Wen Z, Peng L, Ci X. Oridonin attenuates carrageenan‐induced pleurisy via activation of the KEAP‐1/Nrf2 pathway and inhibition of the TXNIP/NLRP3 and NF‐κB pathway in mice. Inflammopharmacology. 2020;28(2):513‐523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241. Gao RF, Li X, Xiang HY, et al. The covalent NLRP3‐inflammasome inhibitor Oridonin relieves myocardial infarction induced myocardial fibrosis and cardiac remodeling in mice. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;90:107133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242. Liu D, Qin H, Yang B, Du B, Yun X. Oridonin ameliorates carbon tetrachloride‐induced liver fibrosis in mice through inhibition of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Drug Dev Res. 2020;81(4):526‐533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243. Yu D, Li J, Wang Y, et al. Oridonin ameliorates acetaminophen‐induced acute liver injury through ATF4/PGC‐1α pathway. Drug Dev Res. 2023;84(2):211‐225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244. Zhao XJ, Zhu HY, Wang XL, et al. Oridonin ameliorates traumatic brain injury‐induced neurological damage by improving mitochondrial function and antioxidant capacity and suppressing neuroinflammation through the Nrf2 pathway. J Neurotrauma. 2022;39(7‐8):530‐543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245. Jayabalan N, Oronsky B, Cabrales P, et al. A review of RRx‐001: a late‐stage multi‐indication inhibitor of NLRP3 activation and chronic inflammation. Drugs. 2023;83(5):389‐402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246. Guo C, Fulp JW, Jiang Y, et al. Development and characterization of a hydroxyl‐sulfonamide analogue, 5‐chloro‐ N ‐[2‐(4‐hydroxysulfamoyl‐phenyl)‐ethyl]‐2‐methoxy‐benzamide, as a novel NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor for potential treatment of multiple sclerosis. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017;8(10):2194‐2201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247. Yi YS. New mechanisms of ginseng saponin‐mediated anti‐inflammatory action via targeting canonical inflammasome signaling pathways. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;278:114292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248. Posadino AM, Giordo R, Pintus G, et al. Medicinal and mechanistic overview of artemisinin in the treatment of human diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;163:114866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249. Yang G, Lee HE, Moon S, et al. Direct binding to NLRP3 pyrin domain as a novel strategy to prevent NLRP3‐driven inflammation and gouty arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72(7):1192‐1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250. Wu X, Sun P, Chen X, et al. Discovery of a novel oral proteasome inhibitor to block NLRP3 inflammasome activation with anti‐inflammation activity. J Med Chem. 2022;65(18):11985‐12001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251. Ha NM, Hop NQ, Son NT. Wedelolactone: a molecule of interests. Fitoterapia. 2023;164:105355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252. Weindel CG, Martinez EL, Zhao X, et al. Mitochondrial ROS promotes susceptibility to infection via gasdermin D‐mediated necroptosis. Cell. 2022;185(17):3214‐3231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253. Liu X, Xia S, Zhang Z, Wu H, Lieberman J. Channelling inflammation: gasdermins in physiology and disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(5):384‐405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254. Ritter AT, Shtengel G, Xu CS, et al. ESCRT‐mediated membrane repair protects tumor‐derived cells against T cell attack. Science. 376(6591):377‐382. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 255. Zhou Z, He H, Wang K, et al. Granzyme A from cytotoxic lymphocytes cleaves GSDMB to trigger pyroptosis in target cells. Science. 2020;368(6494):eaaz7548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256. Niu T, De Rosny C, Chautard S, et al. NLRP3 phosphorylation in its LRR domain critically regulates inflammasome assembly. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):5862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257. Kaminski JJ, Schattgen SA, Tzeng TC, Bode C, Klinman DM, Fitzgerald KA. Synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides containing suppressive TTAGGG motifs inhibit AIM2 inflammasome activation. J Immunol. 2013;191(7):3876‐3883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258. Hu B, Jin C, Li HB, et al. The DNA‐sensing AIM2 inflammasome controls radiation‐induced cell death and tissue injury. Science. 2016;354(6313):765‐768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259. Gao J, Peng S, Shan X, et al. Inhibition of AIM2 inflammasome‐mediated pyroptosis by Andrographolide contributes to amelioration of radiation‐induced lung inflammation and fibrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(12):957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260. Denes A, Coutts G, Lénárt N, et al. AIM2 and NLRC4 inflammasomes contribute with ASC to acute brain injury independently of NLRP3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(13):4050‐4055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261. Ghiboub M, Zhao J, Li Yim AYF, et al. HDAC3 mediates the inflammatory response and LPS tolerance in human monocytes and macrophages. Front Immunol. 2020;11:550769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262. Malvaez M, McQuown SC, Rogge GA, et al. HDAC3‐selective inhibitor enhances extinction of cocaine‐seeking behavior in a persistent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(7):2647‐2652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263. Zhang M, Zhao Q, Xia M, et al. The HDAC3 inhibitor RGFP966 ameliorated ischemic brain damage by downregulating the AIM2 inflammasome. FASEB J. 2020;34(1):648‐662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264. Ahn H, Han BC, Lee SH, Lee GS. Fructose‐arginine, a non‐saponin molecule of Korean Red Ginseng, attenuates AIM2 inflammasome activation. J Ginseng Res. 2020;44(6):808‐814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265. Liu D, Xu X, Dai Y, et al. Blockade of AIM2 inflammasome or α1‐AR ameliorates IL‐1β release and macrophage‐mediated immunosuppression induced by CAR‐T treatment. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(1):e001466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
