Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications
. 2023 Sep 19;79(Pt 10):926–930. doi: 10.1107/S2056989023008101

Synthesis, crystal structure, and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 3-ferrocenyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-amine

Delara Joekar a, Lana K Hiscock a, Louise N Dawe a,*
Editor: M Weilb
PMCID: PMC10561195  PMID: 37817961

The multi-step synthesis, characterization, and structural examination (single-crystal X-ray diffraction and Hirshfeld surface analysis) of 3-ferrocenyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-amine (C18H16FeN4), are reported. The supra­molecular characteristics, including π–π stacking and hydrogen bonding, are discussed, and a database exploration highlights the distinctive combination of mol­ecular components.

Keywords: crystal structure, amino­pyrazole, ferrocene, Hirshfeld surface analysis

Abstract

A key step towards utilizing polynuclear metal-based systems in magnetic device applications involves the careful design of ligands. This strategic planning aims to produce metal assemblies that exhibit some kind of ‘switch’ mechanism. Towards this end, a ligand that incorporates a redox-active functional group (ferrocene) is reported. This communication presents the multi-step synthesis, characterization (1H and 13C NMR), and structural analysis (single-crystal X-ray diffraction and Hirshfeld surface analysis) of 3-ferrocenyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, [Fe(C5H5)(C13H11N4)]. Supra­molecular features, including π–π stacking and hydrogen bonding are qu­anti­fied, while a database search reveals the unique combination of mol­ecular moieties, which offer future opportunities for studies to involve simultaneous Lewis acid and base coordin­ation.

1. Chemical context

We have previously reported a pyrazole-based ligand scaffold, which incorporates groups for both cation and anion coordin­ation, as well as the opportunity for functionalization with other moieties for practical applications, for example, fluorescent tags (Hiscock et al., 2019), or in the area of mol­ecular magnetism. 1.

One step towards achieving magnetic device applications for polynuclear metal-based systems is the strategic design of ligands such that resulting metal assemblies possess some type of ‘switch’ [electrochemical, photo-induced, or other (Cador et al., 2019)]. As an example, a single ion magnet switching process with a bis-di­amino­ferrocene-based ligand for DyIII yielded a chemically (iodine) induced one-electron reduction (Dickie et al., 2017). In this reversible process, a change in magnetization dynamics (in the absence of an applied DC field) characterized this system as an ‘on/off’ switch for slow magnetic relaxation.

Herein, the synthesis, characterization, and structural features of 3-ferrocenyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-amine (1) are described. This ligand design enables future opportunities, as the substituent on the unfunctionalized pyrazole carbon atom can be varied to tune the metal coordination environment, for which single ion magnets are sensitive (Marin et al., 2021; Gálico et al., 2019).

2. Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of 1 is shown in Fig. 1. A Mogul geometry search (Cottrell et al., 2012; Bruno et al., 2004) revealed only one unusual bond angle, present in the pyrazole ring, formed by C7—C8—N3. The experimental value reported for this angle in 1 is 112.3 (2)°, while the Mogul search revealed a mean value of 111.28° with a standard deviation of 0.48° based on 33 observations in the Cambridge Structural Database (Groom et al., 2016). It is noted that despite being flagged as unusual, the value for 1 lies within three standard deviations of that reported from the Mogul search.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The asymmetric unit of 1, shown with displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level and hydrogen atoms as fixed-size spheres with radius of 0.15 Å. The intra­molecular hydrogen bond is represented as a dashed line.

In 1, an intra­molecular hydrogen bond [graph-set notation Inline graphic (6)] from the pyrazole amine group to the pyridyl nitro­gen acceptor (N4—H4B⋯N1; Fig. 1, Table 1) facilitates a near planar orientation of the pyridyl (py) and pyrazole (pz) rings [dihedral py–pz twist angle of 3.16 (3)°]. The orientation of the ferrocenyl cyclo­penta­dienyl ring (cp; C9–13) that is directly bound to the pyrazole ring exhibits a greater twist from planarity, with an observed cp–pz dihedral angle of 12.28 (12)°. The ferrocenyl cyclo­penta­dienyl rings in 1 are approximately eclipsed, with a dihedral angle of 3.8 (4)°.

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N4—H4A⋯N3i 0.86 (3) 2.44 (3) 3.210 (4) 150 (3)
N4—H4B⋯N1 0.88 (4) 2.05 (4) 2.749 (4) 136 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) Inline graphic .

3. Supra­molecular features and Hirshfeld surface analysis

Examination of the crystal packing for 1 reveals short contacts between the mean pz–py planes, parallel to the b axis, with plane-to-plane centroid separations (i.e. shortest distance between planes) of 3.4790 (18) Å and a plane-to-plane shift of 2.006 (3) Å [measured from mol­ecules generated by symmetry operations (ii) x, y, z to (iii) 1 − x, y −  Inline graphic , Inline graphic  − z; Fig. 2]. Inter­molecular hydrogen bonding from the pyrazole amine group to an adjacent pyrazole nitro­gen acceptor (N4—H4A⋯N3i; Table 1) yields infinite chains [graph-set notation Inline graphic (5)] parallel to the c axis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Packing diagrams for 1, represented with displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level; (left) viewed down the c axis to show short contacts between pz–py planes of adjacent mol­ecules; (right) viewed down the b axis to show inter­molecular hydrogen-bonding perpendicular to the pz–py inter­planar inter­actions.

Hirshfeld surface analysis (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009) was performed using CrystalExplorer17 (Spackman et al., 2021). Examination of the shape-index plot (Fig. 3) shows the same short pz–py planar contacts and perpendicular N—H⋯N hydrogen-bonding inter­actions, but also additional short contacts, indicated as red hollows (shape-index <1) and blue bumps (shape-index >1) representing complementary inter­molecular inter­action between donors and acceptor groups, respectively (Tan et al., 2019). These inter­actions are qu­anti­tatively summarized as 2D fingerprint plots (Fig. 4). In these plots, d i is plotted on the x-axis and represents the distance to the nearest nucleus inside the Hirshfeld surface, and d e is plotted on the y-axis, and represents the distance from the Hirshfeld surface to the nearest nucleus outside the surface. These fingerprint plots indicate weak (blue and blue–green) van der Waals H⋯H contacts as the dominant packing inter­action (66.9% of the overall surface) in 1, with C⋯H/H⋯C contacts [i.e. C—H⋯π/π⋯C—H contacts (Tan et al., 2019)] contributing 12.4% of the Hirshfeld area, and N⋯H/H⋯N, N⋯C/C⋯N, and C⋯C inter­actions contributing 7.8%, 6.8% and 6.1% of inter­actions, respectively. Note that, as expected, these plots are pseudo-mirrored along the diagonal, i.e. where d e and d i have the same value.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(Left) Hirshfeld shape index surface for the asymmetric unit of 1, viewed down the b axis; and (right) with symmetry-related mol­ecules making short contacts with the asymmetric unit. Transparent surface representations, with ball-and-stick mol­ecular model on the left, and with mol­ecular bonds represented as tubes and hydrogen bonds as dashed lines on the right. Hydrogen atoms were generated in normalized neutron X—H positions by CrystalExplorer17 (Spackman et al., 2021).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Fingerprint plots showing all close contacts in the crystal structure of 1 (top left), and (other plots) the contributions of the total inter­actions by H⋯H, C⋯H, N⋯H, N⋯C and C⋯C contacts. Plots were generated using CrystalExplorer17 (Spackman et al., 2021).

4. Database survey and conclusion

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Conquest Version 2023.1.0; CSD version 5.44 with April 2023 updates; Groom et al., 2016) yielded 6635 carbon-functionalized mono-substituted ferrocene structures. Narrowing the search parameters to monosubstituted 3-ferrocenyl-1H-pyrazole structures yielded 96 structures with available coordinates, while further limiting the search to require the presence of a 1H-pyrazol-5-amine group resulted in zero previously reported structures. This demonstrates the unique combination of elements in the mol­ecular structure, each of which have been incorporated for a purpose (redox activity, cation coordin­ation, and hydrogen bonding), which we hope to demonstrate in future studies.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on an Agilent Technologies Varian Unity Inova 300 or 400 MHz NMR spectrometer using the indicated deuterated solvents purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Chemical shifts are reported in δ scale in p.p.m. using the residual solvent peak (CDCl3, δ = 7.260) as reference. 2-Hydrazinyl­pyridine was prepared from 2-bromo­pyridine using a modified literature procedure (Klingele et al., 2010), as we have previously reported (Hiscock et al., 2019). α-Chloro­acetyl­ferrocene (Yang et al., 2007) and 3-oxo-3-(ferrocen­yl)propane­nitrile (Rao & Muthanna, 2016) were also prepared via modified literature procedures. All other reagents and starting materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as purchased. Melting points were determined on a Mel-Temp Electrothermal melting point apparatus and are uncorrected.

Synthesis of α-chloro­acetyl­ferrocene is schematically shown in Fig. 5. Dry CH2Cl2 (50 ml) was placed in an oven-dried 250 ml round-bottom flask equipped with a stir bar under a nitro­gen atmosphere. Purified ferrocene (2.00 g, 11.0 mmol, 1.5 eq) was added to the flask producing a clear orange mixture. 2-Chloroacetyl chloride (0.60 mL, 7.2 mmol, 1.0 eq) was also added to the mixture. The round-bottom flask was then placed in an ice bath (NaCl/ice, 1:3). AlCl3 (1.43 g, 7.20 mmol, 1.0 eq) was gradually added to the mixture in three equal portions (0.47 g) every 15 min, resulting in a cloudy dark-purple mixture. It was then stirred at room temperature under a nitro­gen atmosphere for 24 h. Distilled water (50 ml) was added to the flask while stirring in an ice bath. The cloudy dark-purple mixture was placed in a separatory funnel and washed with distilled water (2 × 25 ml) and saturated NaHCO3 (2 × 25 ml). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and the volume was reduced by rotary evaporation. The dark-brown solid was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, 5% EtOAc/PhMe). Rotary evaporation of the fraction containing the product gave α-chloro­acetyl­ferrocene, a dark-red powdery solid (0.260 g, 1.00 mmol, 9%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.81 (s, 2H), 4.63 (s, 2H), 4.27 (s, 5H), 3.76 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 114.2, 76.4, 73.6, 70.6, 69.8, 29.7.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Schematic synthesis of α-chloro­acetyl­ferrocene.

Synthesis of 3-oxo-3-(ferrocen­yl)propane­nitrile is schematically shown in Fig. 6. KCN (0.733 g, 11.0 mmol, 2.0 eq) was placed in a 100 ml round-bottom flask equipped with a stir bar. Distilled water (6.0 ml) and ethanol (17 ml) were added followed by α-chloro­acetyl­ferrocene (1.00 g, 5.10 mmol, 1.0 eq), which resulted in a clear dark-red mixture. It was refluxed for 48 h. The following step was performed with great care: In a very well-ventilated fumehood, HCl (12 M, 1.0 ml) was added and nitro­gen was bubbled through the solution for 1 h. The volume was reduced by rotary evaporation (10 ml NaOH in the trap) yielding a brown powder. It was dissolved in di­chloro­methane (30 ml) and washed with distilled water (3 × 25 ml), K2CO3 (3 × 25 ml), and brine (1 × 25 ml). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and the volume was reduced by rotary evaporation to give 3-oxo-3-(ferrocen­yl)propane­nitrile, a dark-brown powdery solid (0.185 g, 0.964 mmol, 19%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 4.81 (s, 2H), 4.63 (s, 2H), 4.27 (s, 5H), 3.76 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 190.7, 114.2, 76.4, 73.6, 70.6, 69.8, 29.7.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Schematic synthesis of 3-oxo-3-(ferrocen­yl)propane­nitrile.

Synthesis of 3-ferrocenyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-amine is schematically shown in Fig. 7. 2-Hydrazinyl­pyridine (2.80 g, 25.8 mmol, 1.0 eq) and 3-oxo-3-(ferrocen­yl)propane­nitrile (5.04 g, 25.8 mmol, 1.0 eq) were placed in ethanol (20 ml) in a 100 ml round-bottom flask equipped with a condenser and a stir bar. The resulting dark-brown mixture was refluxed for 48 h. The volume was then reduced by rotary evaporation. The product was purified by column chromatography (SiO2, 5% EtOAc/PhMe). Rotary evaporation gave 3-ferrocenyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-amine, a brown–orange crystalline solid containing X-ray quality single-crystals (0.137 g, 0.400 mmol, 2%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.37–8.35 (ddd, J = 5.0, 1.95, 0.85 Hz, 1H), 8.08–8.05 (dt, J = 8.49, 0.96 Hz, 1H), 7.86–7.80 (d, J = 0.75 Hz, 1H), 7.13–7.09 (ddd, J = 7.38, 4.96, 1.06 Hz, 1H), 5.98 (s, 2H), 5.66 (s, J = 0.64 H, 1H), 4.73 (s, 2H), 4.32 (s, 2H), 4.15 (s, 5H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 154.9, 152.3, 149.7, 146.6, 138.8, 119.7, 113.9, 87.3, 78.2, 69.4, 68.6, 66.8.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Schematic synthesis of 3-ferrocenyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-amine.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All the hydrogen atoms, except H4A and H4B, were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.95 Å) and refined using a riding model with U iso(H) =1.2U eq of the carrier atom. Amine hydrogen atoms, H4A and H4B, were introduced in their difference electron density map positions and refined isotropically.

Table 2. Experimental details.

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Fe(C5H5)(C13H11N4)]
M r 344.20
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 110
a, b, c (Å) 17.349 (8), 6.894 (3), 12.173 (5)
β (°) 92.878 (12)
V3) 1454.0 (11)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.04
Crystal size (mm) 0.15 × 0.10 × 0.04
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
T min, T max 0.829, 0.956
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 37974, 2578, 1877
R int 0.105
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.596
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.036, 0.078, 1.02
No. of reflections 2578
No. of parameters 216
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.42, −0.32

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2012), SAINT (Bruker, 2018), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b ), and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989023008101/wm5693sup1.cif

e-79-00926-sup1.cif (1.1MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989023008101/wm5693Isup3.hkl

e-79-00926-Isup3.hkl (206.5KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 2287368

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The following colleagues are gratefully acknowledged: Dr Paul D. Boyle, Western University, for the single-crystal X-ray data collection and Dr Kenneth Maly, Wilfrid Laurier University, for invaluable discussions related to organic synthesis and spectroscopic analysis.

supplementary crystallographic information

Crystal data

[Fe(C5H5)(C13H11N4)] F(000) = 712
Mr = 344.20 Dx = 1.572 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 17.349 (8) Å Cell parameters from 7455 reflections
b = 6.894 (3) Å θ = 3.4–24.7°
c = 12.173 (5) Å µ = 1.04 mm1
β = 92.878 (12)° T = 110 K
V = 1454.0 (11) Å3 Plate, orange
Z = 4 0.15 × 0.10 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 1877 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scans Rint = 0.105
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015) θmax = 25.1°, θmin = 2.4°
Tmin = 0.829, Tmax = 0.956 h = −20→20
37974 measured reflections k = −8→8
2578 independent reflections l = −14→14

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.078 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0216P)2 + 2.158P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.01 (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2578 reflections Δρmax = 0.42 e Å3
216 parameters Δρmin = −0.32 e Å3
0 restraints

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Fe1 0.13466 (2) 0.63057 (6) 0.39894 (3) 0.01773 (13)
N1 0.50809 (14) 0.3811 (4) 0.17719 (18) 0.0217 (6)
N2 0.38601 (13) 0.3858 (4) 0.24937 (18) 0.0175 (5)
N3 0.34008 (13) 0.3919 (4) 0.33927 (18) 0.0182 (5)
N4 0.37249 (17) 0.3811 (4) 0.0502 (2) 0.0232 (6)
H4A 0.3461 (18) 0.318 (5) 0.001 (3) 0.025 (9)*
H4B 0.423 (2) 0.378 (6) 0.054 (3) 0.047 (11)*
C1 0.58538 (17) 0.3775 (5) 0.1939 (2) 0.0249 (7)
H1 0.615939 0.377992 0.131304 0.030*
C2 0.62261 (17) 0.3733 (5) 0.2960 (2) 0.0266 (7)
H2 0.677358 0.370090 0.303644 0.032*
C3 0.57860 (17) 0.3738 (5) 0.3872 (2) 0.0248 (7)
H3 0.602776 0.371625 0.458937 0.030*
C4 0.49941 (16) 0.3774 (5) 0.3735 (2) 0.0220 (6)
H4 0.467917 0.377177 0.435100 0.026*
C5 0.46683 (16) 0.3813 (4) 0.2669 (2) 0.0162 (6)
C6 0.34133 (16) 0.3791 (4) 0.1515 (2) 0.0173 (6)
C7 0.26567 (16) 0.3809 (4) 0.1799 (2) 0.0195 (6)
H7 0.220986 0.377176 0.131562 0.023*
C8 0.26812 (16) 0.3896 (4) 0.2957 (2) 0.0169 (6)
C9 0.20262 (16) 0.3951 (4) 0.3665 (2) 0.0184 (6)
C10 0.12391 (16) 0.3580 (4) 0.3347 (2) 0.0205 (6)
H10 0.104586 0.326560 0.262506 0.025*
C11 0.07891 (17) 0.3757 (4) 0.4286 (2) 0.0206 (6)
H11 0.024704 0.357569 0.430408 0.025*
C12 0.12993 (17) 0.4254 (4) 0.5196 (2) 0.0201 (7)
H12 0.115721 0.445806 0.593091 0.024*
C13 0.20567 (17) 0.4393 (4) 0.4814 (2) 0.0191 (7)
H13 0.250783 0.472386 0.524847 0.023*
C14 0.16504 (19) 0.8494 (5) 0.2979 (3) 0.0344 (9)
H14 0.199240 0.838866 0.239615 0.041*
C15 0.08432 (19) 0.8210 (5) 0.2885 (3) 0.0313 (8)
H15 0.054821 0.787232 0.223430 0.038*
C16 0.05549 (18) 0.8521 (5) 0.3936 (3) 0.0272 (7)
H16 0.002936 0.844053 0.411569 0.033*
C17 0.11837 (18) 0.8970 (4) 0.4671 (3) 0.0293 (8)
H17 0.115362 0.923602 0.543339 0.035*
C18 0.18652 (19) 0.8960 (5) 0.4084 (3) 0.0347 (8)
H18 0.237283 0.921796 0.437669 0.042*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Fe1 0.0171 (2) 0.0199 (2) 0.0163 (2) 0.0013 (2) 0.00189 (16) 0.0013 (2)
N1 0.0217 (14) 0.0254 (13) 0.0186 (13) 0.0004 (13) 0.0064 (11) −0.0001 (13)
N2 0.0176 (13) 0.0225 (13) 0.0126 (11) −0.0001 (12) 0.0015 (10) 0.0016 (12)
N3 0.0194 (13) 0.0231 (13) 0.0125 (12) 0.0038 (12) 0.0046 (10) −0.0016 (11)
N4 0.0221 (16) 0.0333 (16) 0.0142 (13) −0.0030 (14) 0.0029 (12) −0.0051 (13)
C1 0.0211 (17) 0.0290 (17) 0.0254 (16) −0.0003 (16) 0.0090 (13) −0.0003 (16)
C2 0.0174 (16) 0.0306 (17) 0.0321 (18) −0.0005 (16) 0.0043 (14) −0.0026 (18)
C3 0.0237 (17) 0.0273 (16) 0.0229 (16) −0.0036 (16) −0.0017 (13) 0.0011 (16)
C4 0.0201 (16) 0.0288 (16) 0.0172 (15) −0.0005 (16) 0.0027 (12) 0.0008 (16)
C5 0.0172 (15) 0.0133 (13) 0.0184 (14) 0.0009 (13) 0.0020 (12) −0.0004 (14)
C6 0.0198 (16) 0.0181 (14) 0.0134 (14) 0.0009 (14) −0.0027 (12) −0.0009 (14)
C7 0.0203 (16) 0.0224 (15) 0.0153 (14) 0.0018 (15) −0.0036 (12) −0.0026 (14)
C8 0.0179 (15) 0.0167 (14) 0.0163 (14) 0.0014 (13) 0.0019 (12) −0.0008 (13)
C9 0.0207 (16) 0.0178 (15) 0.0167 (15) 0.0007 (13) 0.0014 (12) −0.0018 (13)
C10 0.0214 (16) 0.0225 (15) 0.0174 (15) −0.0026 (15) −0.0008 (12) −0.0006 (14)
C11 0.0196 (16) 0.0214 (15) 0.0210 (15) 0.0004 (15) 0.0037 (12) 0.0023 (15)
C12 0.0239 (17) 0.0210 (16) 0.0155 (15) 0.0012 (13) 0.0037 (13) 0.0015 (12)
C13 0.0205 (17) 0.0206 (15) 0.0160 (15) 0.0016 (13) −0.0001 (13) −0.0013 (12)
C14 0.030 (2) 0.0301 (19) 0.045 (2) 0.0082 (16) 0.0199 (16) 0.0167 (18)
C15 0.0286 (19) 0.038 (2) 0.0273 (18) 0.0078 (16) 0.0037 (15) 0.0159 (15)
C16 0.0213 (17) 0.0259 (17) 0.0348 (18) 0.0042 (15) 0.0072 (14) 0.0088 (16)
C17 0.033 (2) 0.0200 (17) 0.0347 (18) 0.0048 (16) 0.0039 (16) −0.0032 (15)
C18 0.0247 (18) 0.0235 (18) 0.056 (2) −0.0034 (16) 0.0035 (17) 0.0041 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Fe1—C14 2.033 (3) C4—C5 1.389 (4)
Fe1—C13 2.035 (3) C4—H4 0.9500
Fe1—C18 2.040 (3) C6—C7 1.374 (4)
Fe1—C10 2.040 (3) C7—C8 1.409 (4)
Fe1—C17 2.041 (3) C7—H7 0.9500
Fe1—C15 2.044 (3) C8—C9 1.460 (4)
Fe1—C12 2.044 (3) C9—C10 1.423 (4)
Fe1—C11 2.047 (3) C9—C13 1.431 (4)
Fe1—C16 2.053 (3) C10—C11 1.422 (4)
Fe1—C9 2.056 (3) C10—H10 0.9500
N1—C5 1.335 (3) C11—C12 1.425 (4)
N1—C1 1.346 (4) C11—H11 0.9500
N2—N3 1.386 (3) C12—C13 1.419 (4)
N2—C6 1.389 (3) C12—H12 0.9500
N2—C5 1.408 (3) C13—H13 0.9500
N3—C8 1.332 (3) C14—C15 1.413 (5)
N4—C6 1.371 (3) C14—C18 1.415 (5)
N4—H4A 0.86 (3) C14—H14 0.9500
N4—H4B 0.88 (4) C15—C16 1.413 (4)
C1—C2 1.372 (4) C15—H15 0.9500
C1—H1 0.9500 C16—C17 1.410 (4)
C2—C3 1.378 (4) C16—H16 0.9500
C2—H2 0.9500 C17—C18 1.412 (5)
C3—C4 1.376 (4) C17—H17 0.9500
C3—H3 0.9500 C18—H18 0.9500
C14—Fe1—C13 127.63 (13) N4—C6—N2 122.9 (3)
C14—Fe1—C18 40.67 (14) C7—C6—N2 106.4 (2)
C13—Fe1—C18 107.40 (13) C6—C7—C8 105.7 (2)
C14—Fe1—C10 118.24 (13) C6—C7—H7 127.1
C13—Fe1—C10 68.51 (12) C8—C7—H7 127.1
C18—Fe1—C10 151.59 (13) N3—C8—C7 112.3 (2)
C14—Fe1—C17 67.89 (14) N3—C8—C9 120.4 (2)
C13—Fe1—C17 118.39 (13) C7—C8—C9 127.3 (3)
C18—Fe1—C17 40.47 (13) C10—C9—C13 107.0 (2)
C10—Fe1—C17 166.61 (12) C10—C9—C8 126.8 (2)
C14—Fe1—C15 40.56 (13) C13—C9—C8 126.2 (3)
C13—Fe1—C15 165.73 (12) C10—C9—Fe1 69.06 (17)
C18—Fe1—C15 68.51 (14) C13—C9—Fe1 68.72 (16)
C10—Fe1—C15 108.17 (13) C8—C9—Fe1 127.2 (2)
C17—Fe1—C15 68.03 (14) C11—C10—C9 108.9 (2)
C14—Fe1—C12 165.82 (13) C11—C10—Fe1 69.90 (17)
C13—Fe1—C12 40.72 (11) C9—C10—Fe1 70.27 (17)
C18—Fe1—C12 127.85 (14) C11—C10—H10 125.5
C10—Fe1—C12 68.40 (12) C9—C10—H10 125.5
C17—Fe1—C12 108.61 (13) Fe1—C10—H10 125.9
C15—Fe1—C12 152.40 (13) C10—C11—C12 107.5 (3)
C14—Fe1—C11 152.03 (13) C10—C11—Fe1 69.39 (17)
C13—Fe1—C11 68.67 (12) C12—C11—Fe1 69.50 (17)
C18—Fe1—C11 166.21 (13) C10—C11—H11 126.2
C10—Fe1—C11 40.71 (11) C12—C11—H11 126.2
C17—Fe1—C11 128.65 (12) Fe1—C11—H11 126.4
C15—Fe1—C11 118.53 (13) C13—C12—C11 108.1 (3)
C12—Fe1—C11 40.76 (11) C13—C12—Fe1 69.30 (16)
C14—Fe1—C16 67.80 (13) C11—C12—Fe1 69.74 (17)
C13—Fe1—C16 152.29 (12) C13—C12—H12 125.9
C18—Fe1—C16 68.10 (14) C11—C12—H12 125.9
C10—Fe1—C16 128.67 (12) Fe1—C12—H12 126.6
C17—Fe1—C16 40.30 (12) C12—C13—C9 108.5 (3)
C15—Fe1—C16 40.36 (12) C12—C13—Fe1 69.99 (17)
C12—Fe1—C16 119.12 (12) C9—C13—Fe1 70.34 (17)
C11—Fe1—C16 108.84 (13) C12—C13—H13 125.8
C14—Fe1—C9 107.51 (13) C9—C13—H13 125.8
C13—Fe1—C9 40.94 (11) Fe1—C13—H13 125.5
C18—Fe1—C9 117.62 (13) C15—C14—C18 108.7 (3)
C10—Fe1—C9 40.67 (11) C15—C14—Fe1 70.14 (18)
C17—Fe1—C9 151.77 (12) C18—C14—Fe1 69.94 (19)
C15—Fe1—C9 127.65 (12) C15—C14—H14 125.6
C12—Fe1—C9 68.66 (11) C18—C14—H14 125.6
C11—Fe1—C9 68.71 (12) Fe1—C14—H14 125.9
C16—Fe1—C9 166.01 (12) C14—C15—C16 107.5 (3)
C5—N1—C1 116.6 (2) C14—C15—Fe1 69.30 (18)
N3—N2—C6 111.1 (2) C16—C15—Fe1 70.17 (18)
N3—N2—C5 119.3 (2) C14—C15—H15 126.3
C6—N2—C5 129.6 (2) C16—C15—H15 126.3
C8—N3—N2 104.5 (2) Fe1—C15—H15 125.8
C6—N4—H4A 114 (2) C17—C16—C15 108.1 (3)
C6—N4—H4B 113 (2) C17—C16—Fe1 69.41 (18)
H4A—N4—H4B 122 (3) C15—C16—Fe1 69.47 (18)
N1—C1—C2 123.9 (3) C17—C16—H16 126.0
N1—C1—H1 118.1 C15—C16—H16 126.0
C2—C1—H1 118.1 Fe1—C16—H16 126.7
C1—C2—C3 118.3 (3) C16—C17—C18 108.6 (3)
C1—C2—H2 120.8 C16—C17—Fe1 70.29 (18)
C3—C2—H2 120.8 C18—C17—Fe1 69.71 (19)
C4—C3—C2 119.5 (3) C16—C17—H17 125.7
C4—C3—H3 120.2 C18—C17—H17 125.7
C2—C3—H3 120.2 Fe1—C17—H17 125.9
C3—C4—C5 118.1 (3) C17—C18—C14 107.2 (3)
C3—C4—H4 121.0 C17—C18—Fe1 69.82 (19)
C5—C4—H4 121.0 C14—C18—Fe1 69.39 (19)
N1—C5—C4 123.6 (3) C17—C18—H18 126.4
N1—C5—N2 116.6 (2) C14—C18—H18 126.4
C4—C5—N2 119.8 (2) Fe1—C18—H18 125.9
N4—C6—C7 130.6 (3)
C6—N2—N3—C8 −0.2 (3) Fe1—C9—C10—C11 −59.4 (2)
C5—N2—N3—C8 −178.3 (3) C13—C9—C10—Fe1 58.5 (2)
C5—N1—C1—C2 0.3 (5) C8—C9—C10—Fe1 −121.5 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C3 −0.4 (5) C9—C10—C11—C12 0.4 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4 0.4 (5) Fe1—C10—C11—C12 −59.3 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5 −0.3 (5) C9—C10—C11—Fe1 59.6 (2)
C1—N1—C5—C4 −0.2 (5) C10—C11—C12—C13 0.3 (3)
C1—N1—C5—N2 179.8 (3) Fe1—C11—C12—C13 −58.9 (2)
C3—C4—C5—N1 0.2 (5) C10—C11—C12—Fe1 59.2 (2)
C3—C4—C5—N2 −179.7 (3) C11—C12—C13—C9 −0.9 (3)
N3—N2—C5—N1 −178.1 (2) Fe1—C12—C13—C9 −60.1 (2)
C6—N2—C5—N1 4.1 (5) C11—C12—C13—Fe1 59.1 (2)
N3—N2—C5—C4 1.8 (4) C10—C9—C13—C12 1.1 (3)
C6—N2—C5—C4 −175.9 (3) C8—C9—C13—C12 −178.9 (3)
N3—N2—C6—N4 177.0 (3) Fe1—C9—C13—C12 59.8 (2)
C5—N2—C6—N4 −5.1 (5) C10—C9—C13—Fe1 −58.7 (2)
N3—N2—C6—C7 0.0 (3) C8—C9—C13—Fe1 121.3 (3)
C5—N2—C6—C7 177.9 (3) C18—C14—C15—C16 0.6 (4)
N4—C6—C7—C8 −176.4 (3) Fe1—C14—C15—C16 60.1 (2)
N2—C6—C7—C8 0.2 (3) C18—C14—C15—Fe1 −59.5 (2)
N2—N3—C8—C7 0.4 (3) C14—C15—C16—C17 −0.6 (4)
N2—N3—C8—C9 −179.8 (3) Fe1—C15—C16—C17 58.9 (2)
C6—C7—C8—N3 −0.4 (4) C14—C15—C16—Fe1 −59.5 (2)
C6—C7—C8—C9 179.8 (3) C15—C16—C17—C18 0.5 (4)
N3—C8—C9—C10 −167.5 (3) Fe1—C16—C17—C18 59.4 (2)
C7—C8—C9—C10 12.2 (5) C15—C16—C17—Fe1 −58.9 (2)
N3—C8—C9—C13 12.5 (5) C16—C17—C18—C14 −0.2 (4)
C7—C8—C9—C13 −167.7 (3) Fe1—C17—C18—C14 59.6 (2)
N3—C8—C9—Fe1 102.0 (3) C16—C17—C18—Fe1 −59.8 (2)
C7—C8—C9—Fe1 −78.2 (4) C15—C14—C18—C17 −0.3 (4)
C13—C9—C10—C11 −0.9 (3) Fe1—C14—C18—C17 −59.9 (2)
C8—C9—C10—C11 179.1 (3) C15—C14—C18—Fe1 59.6 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N4—H4A···N3i 0.86 (3) 2.44 (3) 3.210 (4) 150 (3)
N4—H4B···N1 0.88 (4) 2.05 (4) 2.749 (4) 136 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2.

Funding Statement

Funding for this research was provided by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant to LND; studentship CGS-D to LKH); Wilfrid Laurier University (studentship Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies to DJ; grant Research Support Fund to LND).

References

  1. Bruker (2012). APEX2. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  2. Bruker (2018). SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Kessler, M., Luo, J., Motherwell, W. D. S., Purkis, L. H., Smith, B. R., Taylor, R., Cooper, R. I., Harris, S. E. & Orpen, A. G. (2004). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44, 2133–2144. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Cador, O., Le Guennic, B. & Pointillart, F. (2019). Inorg. Chem. Front. 6, 3398–3417.
  5. Cottrell, S. J., Olsson, T. S. G., Taylor, R., Cole, J. C. & Liebeschuetz, J. W. (2012). J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 956–962. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Dickie, C. M., Laughlin, A. L., Wofford, J. D., Bhuvanesh, N. S. & Nippe, M. (2017). Chem. Sci. 8, 8039–8049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.
  8. Gálico, D. A., Marin, R., Brunet, G., Errulat, D., Hemmer, E., Fernando, S. A., Moilanen, J. & Murugesu, M. (2019). Chem. Eur. J. pp. 1–14. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Hiscock, L. K., Joekar, D., Balonova, B., Tomas Piqueras, M., Schroeder, Z. W., Jarvis, V., Maly, K. E., Blight, B. A. & Dawe, L. N. (2019). Inorg. Chem. 58, 16317–16321. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Klingele, J., Kaase, D., Hilgert, J., Steinfeld, G., Klingele, M. H. & Lach, J. (2010). Dalton Trans. 39, 4495–4507. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Marin, R., Brunet, G. & Murugesu, M. (2021). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 1728–1746. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Rao, H. S. P. & Muthanna, N. (2016). Synlett, 27, 2014–2018.
  15. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.
  16. Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.
  17. Spackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 19–32.
  18. Spackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  19. Tan, S. L., Jotani, M. M. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2019). Acta Cryst. E75, 308–318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Yang, H., Zhou, Z., Huang, K., Yu, M., Li, F., Yi, T. & Huang, C. (2007). Org. Lett. 9, 4729–4732. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989023008101/wm5693sup1.cif

e-79-00926-sup1.cif (1.1MB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989023008101/wm5693Isup3.hkl

e-79-00926-Isup3.hkl (206.5KB, hkl)

CCDC reference: 2287368

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Crystallographic Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES