Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Oct 9;13:17004. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44225-0

Biomaterial composed of chitosan, riboflavin, and hydroxyapatite for bone tissue regeneration

Justyna Gaweł 1, Justyna Milan 1,2, Jacek Żebrowski 1, Dariusz Płoch 3, Ireneusz Stefaniuk 3, Małgorzata Kus-Liśkiewicz 1,
PMCID: PMC10562422  PMID: 37813934

Abstract

Biomaterial engineering approaches involve using a combination of miscellaneous bioactive molecules which may promote cell proliferation and, thus, form a scaffold with the environment that favors the regeneration process. Chitosan, a naturally occurring biodegradable polymer, possess some essential features, i.e., biodegradability, biocompatibility, and in the solid phase good porosity, which may contribute to promote cell adhesion. Moreover, doping of the materials with other biocompounds will create a unique and multifunctional scaffold that will be useful in regenerative medicine. This study is focused on the manufacturing and characterization of composite materials based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite, and riboflavin. The resulting films were fabricated by the casting/solvent evaporation method. Morphological and spectroscopy analyses of the films revealed a porous structure and an interconnection between chitosan and apatite. The composite material showed an inhibitory effect on Staphylococcus aureus and exhibited higher antioxidant activity compared to pure chitosan. In vitro studies on riboflavin showed increased cell proliferation and migration of fibroblasts and osteosarcoma cells, thus demonstrating their potential for bone tissue engineering applications.

Subject terms: Biotechnology, Medical research, Materials science

Introduction

Bone naturally possesses the intrinsic ability to regenerate during skeleton development or remodeling throughout adult life, but also in response to various types of injuries1. In comparison to soft tissues, which heal predominantly through scar tissue formation, bones heal through the generation of new bone. Therefore, bone repair can be described as a regenerative process2,3. In the clinical settings, the most common form of bone regeneration is fracture healing3. The biology of bone healing is very complex, involving many types of cells and intracellular and extracellular molecular signaling pathways to regenerate the skeleton and restore its function. It comprises a well-orchestrated series of events; including the formation of hematomas, the formation of fibrocartilaginous callus, the formation of bone callus, and bone remodeling4. However, there are cases of bone fractures in which bone regeneration is impaired; there may be delayed union or non-union of the bones. This is due to major injuries, infections, certain diseases such as osteoporosis, or other surgical interventions that led to the excision of the bone. In such cases, a bone graft is essential5. Nowadays, many methods are available, including allograft, autograft, and synthetic bone grafts. The autograft is harvested from the patient’s own body from a different unaffected site, while the allograft is from living donors or cadavers. Autogenous bone grafts remain the gold standard therapy, since the donor and recipient are the same individuals and there are no issues with histocompatibility. The allograft is the next best alternative; however, the processing step may alter mechanical competency and there is a risk of transmitting disease. Therefore, significant research and development has been done to generate alternative options in the form of synthetic bone substitutes6,7.

The frequency of bone grafting is, in fact, the second most frequent tissue transplant worldwide, occurring immediately after a blood transfusion8. Half a million patients are reported to receive bone defect repairs per year in the United States and Europe with an estimated cost exceeding US$ 3 billion9. It is estimated that the number of people at high risk of osteoporotic fractures will double by 2040 in the Western world due to demographic aging; therefore, there is a high demand for the development of new types of synthetic bone graft10, especially a graft that combines a synthetic scaffold with diverse biologic elements to stimulate cell infiltration and new bone formation6.

Biodegradable materials have been at the forefront of cutting-edge research and offer a truly viable option in the design and manufacture of composites in biomedical engineering11. In the treatment of bone defects, scaffolds made of biodegradable materials can provide a bridge for the growth of new bone tissue in the gap. It may be a platform for cells and growth factors, which will eventually be degraded and absorbed in the body and replaced by new bone tissue. In general, the objective of tissue engineering is to allow the body's own cells to replace the implanted scaffold over time. Thus, biodegradability is one of the most important features12. Numerous synthetic and natural polymers have been used in the attempt to fabricate scaffolds. Commonly used synthetic polymers, including polystyrene, poly-l-lactic acid, polyurethane, and polyglycolic acid, can be easily fabricated with a tailored architecture13. However, these materials are at risk of rejection and are not considered bioactive. Contrary, the natural polymers used to manufacture scaffold, such as collagen/gelatin, alginate, chitosan, silk, hyaluronic acid, elastin14, are biologically active, have low risk of rejection, and usually promote cell proliferation. On the other hand, the main drawback of this polymer is that they have relatively poor mechanical properties, which limits their application. Therefore, the development of composite scaffolds that consisting of several phases is desired because it may combine the good processability of the composite with the excellent mechanical strength12,15.

Chitosan (CS) is a polycationic aminopolysaccharide obtained by N-deacetylation of chitin, the main ingredient of crustacean shells, fungi, or insects16. It is a well-known biocompatibility, biodegradability, and cytocompatibility component of various scaffolds and composites. Due to its excellent film-forming properties, many biomedical applications have been considered1618. Among them, the biomaterial composed of chitosan and hydroxyapatite seems to be one of the main types of materials considered for bone regeneration19. Hydroxyapatite (HAP) is the main mineral component of bone tissue, so it has been widely used, such as bone tissue engineering or skeleton implants20,21. Furthermore, the chitosan/HAP scaffold has been shown to act as a proliferative support for bone cells22. Riboflavin is one of the vitamins necessary in the human diet. It can be provided primarily from plant sources23. In industry, it is most often produced synthetically, while it is also synthesized by various types of microorganisms24. The endogenous riboflavin synthesis pathway may be the target of the development of antimicrobials and exogenous riboflavin against infectious diseases caused by microorganisms. Vitamin B2 is used for the prevention and treatment of migraines25, it has excellent antioxidant properties, which is why the animal body needs it to protect against oxidative stress26. In nanotechnology, riboflavin is used for targeted drug delivery, in optoelectronics or biosensors27. Riboflavin is also being investigated for applications in photodynamic therapy28,29. Moreover, a potential use of riboflavin as adjuvants to improve bone metabolism is also suggested30.

In the past few decades, many techniques have been used to prepare scaffolds for tissue repairs, such as thermally induced phase separation, freeze-drying, gas foaming, electrospinning, 3D printing, solvent casting, and phase separation3134. Each of the methods has its own advantages and disadvantages. Among them, the casting and drying technique is commonly used because this is a simple, low-cost method and there is no need for any sophisticated apparatus. No matter the choice of the manufacturing assay, the scaffold has to exhibit specific features, depending on their future application. In particular, when composites are considered, the successful incorporation of the component into the matrix is anticipated. He et al. reported on the casting/evaporating method of composite synthesis35. Indeed, they obtain hybrid films where the nanoparticles of hydroxypaptite were uniformly dispersed in the NaOH/urea aqueous system. Other studies show that collagen films, synthesized by casting aqueous collagen solution with solvent, may serve as cell carriers suitable for tissue engineering36.

In this study, chitosan-based composites, incorporated with riboflavin and hydroxyapatite, were fabricated and their properties were evaluated (Fig. 1). The physical, structural, and biological properties of the nanocomposite film and riboflavin, as the naturally occurring ingredient, were characterized. For the first time, the composite was performed with the riboflavin obtained and purified from yeast, thus the film exhibits a high rate of bioavailability. Usually, the ABTS or DPPH assay is the most commonly used method for measuring antioxidant activity; however, the most efficient electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy is considered. Therefore, here the spin trapping technique in combination with EPR spectroscopy was used to demonstrate the generation of hydroxyl radicals by RFirradiation. Raman analysis showed that there is an interlinkage between chitosan and HAP, whereas there is no interlinkage with RF. This may cause leakage of the RF from the composite and make it bioavailable. To estimate the impact of RF, extracted riboflavin was tested on eukaryotic cells to assess its cytotoxicity and proliferative potential. In addition, the antioxidant and antibacterial capacity of these films was assessed. Our hypothesis is that the combination of naturally occurring chitosan and riboflavin with hydroxyapatite results in a material with unique characteristics that can be used further as bone regeneration material.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Scheme of the procedures for composites synthesis and the subsequent steps in their functions and evaluation of applications.

Materials and methods

Materials

For composite preparation, medium molecular weight chitosan (190–310 kDa), aqueous solutions of acetic acid (99.8%) and hydroxyapatite were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Synthetic riboflavin (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a control for the RF naturally obtained. For the antioxidant activity of the compound, ABTS (Pol-Aura, Poland) was used. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) and dimethylsulfoxide for the characterization of yeast riboflavin, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA) and Stanlab (Poland), respectively. For EPR measurements, potassium hydroxide and hydrogen peroxide (Chempur, Poland) as well as α-(4-pyridyl-1-oxide)-N-tert-butylnitrone (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were used.

Cell lines, strain and culture conditions

Cell lines and yeast strain were obtained from the University of Rzeszow Institute of Biotechnology collection. For the cell culture experiment, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium High Glucose (DMEM, Corning, USA), fetal bovine serum (FBS, Biowest, France), phosphate buffered saline w/o magnesium and calcium (PBS, Corning, USA), 0.25% trypsin (PAA, Germany), antibiotic solution (Antibiotic Antimycotic Solution, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were used. No human or animal was involved in the study. Human bone osteosarcoma epithelial cells (U2OS) and mouse fibroblasts (NIH3T3) were used. Standard techniques were used for mammalian cell cultures. Cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 1% antibiotic solution and 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2; subculture with typical trypsin treatment. Through the study, the engineered strain Candida famata (AF-4/SEF1/RIB1/RIB7) was used. YPD medium (BTL, Poland) containing yeast extract (10 g/L), peptone (10 g/L) and dextrose (20 g/L) was used to prepare the precultures.

Composite preparation and characterization

The chitosan-acetic acid solution was prepared as described elsewhere37. Composites, in the form of films, were obtained by using the casting/solvent evaporation method. To prepare the composites, 7.5 mL of 2% chitosan-acetic acid solution was taken and mixed with 3.5 mL of riboflavin (60 µg/mL) and 5 mL of 1% hydroxyapatite. To simplify further sample nomenclature, an abbreviation was used, where CH stands for chitosan film, CH/RF stands for chitosan mixed with riboflavin, and CH/RF/HAP stands for chitosan mixed with riboflavin and hydroxyapatite. To obtain the solid form of the film, 10 mL of each liquid composite was poured onto the teflon surface and dried at 22 °C for 48 h.

Composite surface morphology examination by scanning electron microscope (SEM)

The composite materials in liquid form were placed on the aluminium grid and dried at room temperature for 24 h. Prior to SEM observation, the samples were sputtered with a 4 nm gold layer to provide them with electronic conductivity and avoid electronic charging during SEM imaging. SEM analysis was carried out using a TLD electron detector in secondary electron (SE) mode with the following operating parameters: voltage 3 kV, sample current 50 pA, and magnification 1–50 kx.

Thickness measurements

3D scans with foil thickness measurement were performed on an OLYMPUS LEXT OLS5000 3D confocal laser microscope with a 10× objective (MPLFLN10xLEXT). The samples were attached to double-sided adhesive tape, which eliminated the problem of rolling thin foils. The average thickness of the foil was measured using the "step height" function, taking the plane of the adhesive tape surface as the base value—"0", and the plane of the glued sample within the field of view of the lens—as the value of the sample thickness, omitting the area directly at the edge. The field of view of the lens was: 1280 × 1280 µm.

FTIR-ATR analysis

Infrared spectral analysis of riboflavin, chitosan, and chitosan-riboflavin-hydroxyapatite composites was performed using IRSpirit-T (Shimadzu, Japan) spectrometer with attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory (QATR-S) at a resolution of 4 cm−1 and 64 scans. The surface of the diamond crystal was cleaned with 70% ethanol to remove residuals from previous samples and a background was collected prior to each measurement. The spectra were baseline corrected and the area normalized before the analysis using the ChemoSpec package38 in the R programming language39.

Antioxidant properties of composite

The method for determining the scavenging capacity of ABTS free radicals was based on the method described above40, with some modifications. Briefly, equal amounts of liquid forms of composites were mixed with ABTS (7 mM) and kept dark for 10–30 min. The samples were centrifuged (5000×g, 15 min) and the absorbance of the supernatants was measured at 734 nm. The activity of scavenging (SA%) radicals was expressed as follows:

SA%=Absctrl-AbssampleAbsctrl×100

where Absctrl and Abssample are the absorbances of the control sample and the tested sample, respectively.

Antibacterial activity

For the antimicrobial assay, the gram-negative strain Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) was employed. Nutrient broth and agar (BTL, Poland) or phosphate buffered saline (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were used for cell culture and serial dilutions, respectively. All assays were carried out in a laminar flow hood (Thermo Scientific, MSC Advantage). The bacteria preculture was overnight incubated under aerobic conditions at 37 °C, and then diluted to give an initial concentration of approximately 1 × 106 cells/mL. Aliquots of composite material (CS/HAP/RF) were mixed with inoculum and incubated for another 24 h with shaking. After this time, the aliquots of the control and tested samples were serially diluted and poured onto the agar plate. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) was counted and expressed as the CFU/mL. All experiments were carried out in triplicate.

Riboflavin characterization

Spectrum identification

Candida famata was grown for 5 days in YNB medium composed of yeast nitrogen base (1.7 g/L), glucose (10 g/L) and glycine (10 g/L) at 30 °C on a rotating shaker (150 rpm) in the dark. The biomass was sediment after centrifugation (10,000×g, 15 min) and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter (Merck). As reference riboflavin, the standard of vitamin B2 purchased from Sigma-Aldrich was used. The absorption spectrum and fluorescence emission spectrum of isolated and reference RFs were recorded (Infinite M200, Thermo Scientific).

EPR measurements of radicals

Superoxide anions were generated immediately before the EPR measurements by mixing 50 µL KOH solution (25 mM) with 50 µL hydrogen peroxide (25 mM) and then 50 µL of DMSO and 50 µL of POBN (180 mM) were added. After 5 min, 100 µL of solution of isolated RF (60 µg/mL) and 100 µL of POBN solution (prepared as above) were mixed and placed in a quartz glass test tube on the BRUKER FT-EPR ELEXSYS E580 spectrometer (BRUKER BIOSPIN, Billerica, MA, USA) with digital registration. The following settings were used: frequency, 9.403467 GHz; central field, 348.50 G; modulation amplitude, 0.5 G; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; microwave power, 47.43 mW; power attenuation 5 dB; scan range, 100 G; conversion time, 30 ms; sweep time, 30.72 s. The EPR spectra were recorded and analyzed using Xepr 2.6b.74 software. Xepr is a comprehensive software package of the ELEXSYS series, accommodating the needs of every user with highly developed acquisition and processing tools.

Raman spectroscopy

The identification of RF in the extract of yeast was performed by comparing the Raman spectra of the extract and the reference RF sample in solution and in the form of a powder. The i-Raman Plus (B&W Tek, Delaware, USA) spectrometer with a 785 nm diode laser as the excitation source and CCD cooled detector was utilized. The instrument was coupled to a video microscope (B&W Tek Inc., BAC151, 20× objective lens). The spectra were collected at 5 accumulations, acquisition time 15 s, and laser power of at least 20 mW. The sample solution was deposited on the aluminium folia and allowed to evaporate before measurements.

Biological properties of yeast riboflavin

Metabolic activity and cell migration ability after RF treatment were performed using the MTT and wound healing assay, respectively41,42. Cells were seeded onto the 96- or 12-well plate at a density 3 × 104 or 1 × 105 cell/well. For the MTT assay, 200 µL of DMEM containing different concentrations of RF was added to the wells. After 24 h of incubation, the medium was discarded and then 200 µL of MTT (0.5 mg/mL) suspended in DMEM was added per well. After 4 h of additional incubation, the supernatant was discarded again and the purple formazans were dissolved with 100 µL of DMSO. The absorbance was read at a test wavelength of 570 nm and a reference wavelength of 630 nm and the OD results were presented as the percentage of controls values. For the wound healing assay, confluent cells in a 12-well plate were scratched in the diameter of the culture well. The cells were then washed with PBS to remove non-adherent and dead cells. The wells were filled with 500 µL of DMEM supplemented with various concentrations of RF. Wound closures were periodically visualized (0, 24, and 48 h) under a microscope and compared with etoposide treatment (a well-known inhibitor of cell migration).

Results and discussion

Biomaterial’s morphology

Self-healing of the bone from damage caused by infection or trauma is limited; therefore, external intervention is needed to stimulate bone repair43. At present, various biomaterials are being designed to develop a composite material suitable for bone regeneration. Hydroxyapatite is often used in dental and orthopedic implants, because it can induce the formation of bone-like apatite and promote bone healing44. Fillers such as bioactive nano-hydroxyapatite are also used, where the nano-hydroxyapatite surface allows osteoblastic cell adhesion and growth; therefore, new bone is formed by substitution from adjacent normal bone43,45. However, HAP possess some limitations, that is, its tendency to fragment and trigger inflammatory reactions22. Hybrid materials composed of chitosan and hydroxyapatite have been reported to have synergetic actions to significantly improve the biocompatibility and osteoconductivity in living bodies of these materials46. In view of the biocompatibility requirements of bone regeneration biomaterials, hybrid composites based on chitosan and hydroxyapatite were fabricated. Moreover, in order to develop a more efficient biomaterial, doping it with riboflavin as the proliferating agent could be of interest and desirable. The casting/solvent evaporation method was used to manufacture the nanocomposite, in which the solvent is removed by standard drying practices (Fig. 2A). This technique does not require complex instrumentation, harsh chemicals, or high temperatures; thus, it is a simple, cost- and time-effective assay to produce a chitosan-based film47. In addition, they are easy to handle since in the solid form they do not require specific storage, i.e. low temperature or humidity. The thickness of the film was estimated using 3D confocal laser microscope (Fig. 2B). The manufacture of chitosan-based composite results in films with thickness of 28, 19, 42, and 30 µm for Ch, Ch/RF, Ch/HAP, and Ch/HAP/RF respectively. This analysis demonstrated the difference between the thickness of films doped with riboflavin, as these composites were thinner. Indeed, decrease in the thickness of the chitosan-based films occurred after doping it with various organic compounds48. Therefore, modification of chitosan-based scaffolds provide the ability to tailor the physiochemical properties of the composites. The surface morphology of the composite materials was visualized by SEM (Fig. 2C). The SEM images revealed that the surface of the composite materials is porosity and contains pores, compared to the smooth surface of pure chitosan. These characteristics may contribute to the cell adhesion of bone regeneration material, due to the phenomenon that porosity may play an important role in osteoconductivity49. Some studies have demonstrated a greater degree and faster rate of bone ingrowth or apposition with percentage porosity. Sufficient porosity of suitable size and interconnections between pores provides an environment to promote cell infiltration, migration, vascularisation, nutrient and oxygen flow, and removal of waste materials while being able to withstand external loading stresses50,51.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Representative film images (A) with thickness estimation (B), and SEM micrographs (C) of the pure chitosan and composite material doped with hydroxyapatite and/or riboflavin.

Biomaterial’s chemical structure

We further used vibration spectroscopy to identify the chemical composition of yeast extract prepared for the experiments and to inspect chemical structure and thus possible interlinks between compounds/phases comprising the CS-RF-HAP composite (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

ATR-FTIR spectra of chitosan (CS)(lower), riboflavin (RF), CS-RF, hydroxyapatite (HAP), CS-HAP, and the chitosan-riboflavin-hydroxyapatite CS-RF-HAP as mixture in solution and as solid composite (upper) (from bottom to top). The mMeans and SD of the absorbances are presented as mid-darker lines and shaded ribbons, respectively; n = 15. Relevant for discussion regions are shaded grey and bands are labelled.

Chitosan was characterized by major bands around 1640 cm−1 (amide I, C=O stretch), 1555 cm−1 (amide II, N–H bend), 1410 cm−1 (C–N stretch), 1380 cm−1 (CH3 deformation), 1150 cm−1 (C–N stretch, C–O–C stretch), 1070 cm−1 (C–O–C stretch), 1025 cm−1 (C–O–C stretch), most of which are consistent with reports from other studies5255. Infrared spectroscopy showed substantially altered spectrum of the CS/HAP/RF composite compared to that of pure chitosan. This reflected not only the presence of added HAP, enriching spectrum with bands assigned primarily to vibrations of the phosphate group (strong bands located in the region between 1150 and 1000 cm−15658, but also showed changes in the location, intensity, and shape of bands attributed to CS. The most striking changes were related to the amide I band, which corresponds to the C=O stretching vibrations of the residual N-acetylated groups, and to the amine and hydroxyl groups evenly distributed along the chitosan chain. These groups serving putatively as interactive sides were deduced on the basis of disappearance or diminishing intensity of bands at about 1640, 1308, 1150 cm−1, assignation of which was discussed in the literature5963.

To have deeper insight into mechanism of the interlinkage formation between compounds of the composite we additionally analysed the spectra of chitosan-riboflavin, chitosan-hydroxyapatite, and all the composite compounds (CS-RF-HAP) in fluid state (Fig. 3). We took into consideration also reference spectra of the pure riboflavin powder and HAP. The RF is characterized mainly by the C=O stretching vibrations at 1732 and 1648 cm−1, the major peak at around 1540 cm−1 from the C–C stretching vibrations of the ring I coupled with the CN double bond stretching as well as by multiple bands attributed to the C–C, C–N stretching and the CH or CNH bending vibrations64.Addition of riboflavin to chitosan did not alter visibly the spectral features of chitosan, indicating that majority of functional groups of the chitosan remained available for potential cross-linking between the chitosan and HAP to form a scaffold. Indeed, the presence of HAP reduced the intensity of the CS bands at 1640 cm−1 and 1150 cm−1 as well as the ratio of the absorbance intensities I1070/I1025. Some decrease of the absorbance was also observed at 1380 cm−1. Further addition of the riboflavin slightly increased the effects, that may indicate some contribution of RF formation of the cross-linkages. However, the mixture of all the compounds in form of solution did not mimic completely the spectrum of CS-RF-HAP composite in solid phase, although all the measurements were conducted for the air-dried samples. This indicated that more abundant cross-linkage is established during formation of the composite than in the course of drying the mixture of the compounds in solution.

Earlier studies on composites produced on the basis of CS and HAP showed similar spectral characteristics that were mainly attributed to the formation of hydrogen bonds between CS and HAP through the functional groups mentioned above56,62,63,65,66. The examined spectra also resembled, to some extent, phosphorylated chitosan spectra67,68, which may also suggest the formation of covalent bonds with the participation of phosphate groups. It should be mentioned that the FTIR-ATR technique, used in this study, reflects chemical structure only on the surface of examined samples. The obtained spectral features indicate also some heterogeneity of the composite sheets in terms of the compounds ratios and interlinks formed, which was demonstrated by a relatively high standard deviation of the spectral absorbances. (Fig. 3). This study did not provide clear evidence that RF was bound via chemical bonds to the CS-HAP scaffold, as RF contribution was observed in the composite spectrum as a very weak bands at 1740 cm−1, at 1650 cm−1 (a small sharp peak instead of reduced broad amide I), and possibly contributing to the shoulder at 1540 cm−1 (frequency similar to that of the major RF band), all without substantial location changes compared to the reference RF spectra69,70. Possibly, this compound is just adsorbed, and thus is easily available to perform its biological activity. Infrared spectroscopy also allowes us to detect carbonation of HAP (a shoulder at 1443 cm−1 and a weak band at 870 cm−1), which made the composite matrix of less regular structure compared to HAP without substitution71. This may alter the physical and chemical properties of the scaffold72 in order to better perform in potential regenerative applications, particularly when the matrix is supplemented with RF.

Characterization of composites

The development of new types of antioxidant biomaterials is of utmost importance due to the increasing problems with pathogen transmission. Hence, in the next study the antioxidant and antimicrobial potential of the active biomaterial was examined. In general, the incorporation of RF increased antioxidant activity compared to pure and hydroxyapatite–doped chitosan (Fig. 4A). Numerous studies have investigated the antioxidant properties of some vitamins such as vitamin E, vitamin C, and carotenoids (review in26) and their effects on human health. However, riboflavin is the one neglected antioxidant vitamin, which in fact acts as a coenzyme for redox enzymes in the forms FAD and FMN. The results of the reviewed studies indicate that the antioxidant nature of RF is due to protection of the body against oxidative stress, especially lipid peroxidation and reperfusion oxidative26. Researchers have already shown the development of the biodegradable material incorporated with riboflavin, however its antioxidant potential has not been evaluated73. The antimicrobial results showed the inhibitory effect on Staphylococcus aureus; the number of colony-forming units was significantly reduced (Fig. 4B). Thus, the results of this work are very valuable in the field of using material to bone regeneration and impact on the oxidative injuries, as well as the material with enhancement of antibacterial potential, i.e. in food packaging industry.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The ability of pure and doped-composites to scavenge ABTS free radicals (A). The antibacterial activity of composite material (CS/HAP/RF) compare to the control group, non-treated bacteria (B). The error bars indicated the standard deviation of three independent experiments.

This antibacterial performance of the riboflavin-doped composite may be the result of the photosensitizer action of RF. Irradiated riboflavin is known togenerate significant intracellular ROS and induce oxidative stress74. Thus, we further examined the nature of the RF isolated from yeast, which was the component of the composite materials.

Physico-chemical and biological properties of the riboflavin

Riboflavin production was determined, during a fermentation period that lasted 5 days. During this experiment, we noticed that the color of the fermentation broth gradually turned yellow and emitted fluorescence when exposed to UV light (Fig. 5 inset). To characterize riboflavin, its ultraviolet–visible and excitation/emission spectra were recorded with a fluorescence spectrophotometer. The absorption spectrum and fluorescence emission spectrum of isolated and reference riboflavin are presented in Fig. 5A and B, respectively. In the wavelength range of 300 to 800 nm, the absorption spectrum of both riboflavin demonstrated two absorption peaks at 370 and 440 nm (Fig. 5A). In the fluorescence scans (Fig. 5B), the emission maximum is reached at 533 nm for the fluorescence emission spectrum, with excitation at 450 nm. The data obtained for the riboflavin isolated from yeast overlapped with the spectrum of the reference riboflavin. In fact, riboflavin identification has been previously determined, where the highest peak was reached at ~ 370 and ~ 440 nm or at ~ 530 nm, for the UV–Vis and fluorescence spectrum, respectively75,76.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

UV–vis (A) and fluorescence emission spectrum (B) of standard riboflavin sample and isolated riboflavin after 5 days of incubation. The inset with the fluorescence of yeast RF under UV irradiation.

Oxidative stress plays an important role in homeostasis and disease in most tissues. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are continuously generated as by-products of normal cellular metabolism77. Moreover, ROS are increasingly being recognized as a key component of the bone repair paradigm78. RF has been reported to be one of the photosensitizers, which can be activated in certain wavelengths to produce reactive oxygen species with strong oxidation, in order to inactivate pathogenic microorganisms. This unique feature is directly related to its chemical structure, which creates great potential for RF to be used as a mediator to prepare polymer functional materials. The critical structure that determines that RF belongs to the flavin family is a tricyclic structure 7,8-dimethyl-10-alkylisoalloxazine. This essential fragment is responsible for the redox process, subsequent catalytic activity, UV absorption, and photosensitivity79. In fact, some studies have been conducted on the role of RF in combination with biopolymers in tissue engineering80. The absorbance and fluorescence spectrum of isolated RF may suggest its well behavior as a photosensitizer after irradiation. The next experiment presents an EPR study of the free radicals formed by exposing riboflavin to blue light. POBN has been used as spin-traps for the short-lived free radicals formed during this process. The concentration of radicals after RF irradiation is shown in Fig. 6. Blue-light irradiation increased the initial concentration of radicals in RF, up to the 15 min time of illumination. However, after the light is switched off, the constant level (no further increase) of radicals is observed. This study shows the possibility of using RF as a component of materials for bone regeneration, which may interact after irradiation, resulting in increased radicals. Sel et al. reported on impact of UVA irradiation of riboflavin, which in fact, generated oxygen-dependent hydroxyl radicals81. Moreover, it is noticed that vitamin under visible light can also generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide anions and singlet oxygen82. On the basisof these facts, we can conclude that photoilluminated riboflavin renders the redox status of bacterial cells in a compromised state leading to significant membrane damage, ultimately causing bacterial death. Although we showed the antibacterial potential of composite, the more effective material after its irradiation may have occurred. This study aims to add one more therapeutic dimension to the photoilluminated of composite doped with RF, as it can be effectively employed to targe bacterial biofilms occurring after bioimplantation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Evolution of the time of the EPR signals (total radicals) during 15 min blue-light irradiation of the RF with the POBN spin trapping agent added.

The presence of riboflavin in the yeast extract was examined by vibration spectroscopy. Initially applied infrared spectroscopy provided only poor results since the extract deposited on a diamond crystal of the ATR device produced low, and thus noisy, absorbance. This resulted from the fact that only a small amount of dissolved compounds remained on the surface of the ATR crystal after diluent evaporation. More plausible information was achieved using Raman spectroscopy along a microscope device. The spectral characteristics of the extract highly resembled those of the RF standard in solution (Fig. 7). In particular, high conformity in location and shape was observed for the most prominent and specific band around of 1347 cm−1, assigned to the in-plane vibrations of the isoalloxazine ring83. Moderate absorbances in the low frequency region (around 1180, 973, 878, 542 and 441 cm−1), possibly assigned to C–H and O–H deformations vibration of ribityl chain and out-of-plain vibrations of the rings84,85 further confirmed the high performance of the extraction process.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Raman spectra of riboflavin (RF) extracted from yeast (top), the RF standard in solution (middle), and the RF standard in the form of a powder (bottom). The prominent peaks are labelled and shaded grey. The peak around 1347 cm−1, assigned mainly to the in-plane vibrations of the isoalloxazine ring, is a unique spectral marker of RF. The inset presents the chemical structure of RF.

Riboflavin is a well-known component of flavo-coenzymes important in numerous reactions. But other biological properties have also been ascribed to riboflavin. Among them, its additive effect on osteoblast differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells seems promising and may be a therapeutic approach to the treatment of osteoporosis30. Moreover, the development of biomaterials with unique features has recently attracted great attention for bone regeneration, wound healing, and medical purposes86. Thus, we also performed experiments to assess the biological activity of RF as a future component of the composite material. The potential effect of RF on cell metabolic activity was tested using the MTT assay, which measures cell mitochondrial activity through the NAD(P)H-dependent cellular oxidoreductase enzyme87. The metabolic activity of various concentrations of riboflavin in two different cell lines: mouse embryonic fibroblasts (NIH 3T3) and human osteosarcoma (U-2OS) is shown in Fig. 8. We found that treatment with riboflavin significantly increased cell metabolic activity, especially when exposed to the isolated vitamin from a microorganism. The results show that this metabolite does not have a toxic impact on the tested cell lines. Indeed, our data are in line with the Chaves Nato et al. who reported on riboflavin and its irradiated version, which did not affect osteoblast viability30. Moreover, the protective effect of riboflavin as a component of other materials has also been suggested. Xizhe Li et al. manufactured ultrasmall riboflavin-protected silver nanoclusters (RF@AgNCs) that can effectively kill or suppress pathogen growth. At the same time, they were found to be non-toxic to human red blood cells and mammalian cells88.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Percentage of metabolic activity of cells after 24 h of exposure to different concentrations of standard and yeast riboflavin. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. Data analysis was carried out by two-way ANOVA and averaged from three replicates (n = 3).

Many authors usually report on the cytotoxicity or biocompatibility of the compound tested with respect to cells based on the only one method used for the analysis. Therefore, in this study, either the MTT assay or wound healing assay have been performed to evaluate the metabolic activity or the motility capacities of the cells, respectively. Cell mobility plays a crucial role in many physiological and pathological processes. Cell migration occurs during embryo development, wound healing, or immune response. The motility capacities has also been implicated in many diseases such as cancer or inflammation89. Therefore, cell mobility could be used as a parameter to assess the physiological state of the cell42,90. To evaluate the migration response of NIH3T3, cells were exposed to different concentrations of RF and allowed to migrate for 48 h (Fig. 9). Etoposide was used as chemical that exhibits a negative impact on the wound-healing ability of the cell91.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Microscope observation of scratch closure after treatment of mouse fibroblasts (NIH3T3) and etoposide with riboflavin. Arrows indicate the scratched area, scale bar 200 µm. Time zero corresponds to the addition of RF.

After 48 h of exposure of cells to riboflavin, the scratch closure of NIH3T3 cells was close to 100%, for each concentrations tested (Fig. 9). Here, the etoposide acts as a chemical which inhibited the migration of the cells. On the basis of these two biological experiments, we concluded that riboflavin had no negative effect on cell migration and its metabolic activity. Furthermore, it may play a role as a compound that activates cell proliferation.

Conclusions

Developing non-cytotoxic composite materials with unique additional functions is crucial for bone regeneration and tissue engineering fields. The present study demonstrated the effectiveness multifunctional composite. The material can be prepared into scaffold using chitosan as a matrix and hydroxyapatite and riboflavin as a phase filler. The porous surface morphology and possible interlinkage between the components, after doping of the pure chitosan, were confirmed through the SEM and FTIR analysis, respectively. Compared to existing technologies for the manufacture of the chiotsan/HAP scaffold, doping it with riboflavin showed the novel features; i.e. antimicrobial potential and antioxidant activity. Moreover, the non-cytotoxic RF significantly enhanced cell proliferation and migration, and is light-activated, producing the radicals. Therefore, this study demonstrated the new material that could be useful for bone tissue regeneration.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to prof. Andriy Sybirnyy and prof. Justyna Ruchała for enabling experiments on the Candida famata strain.

Author contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. M.K-L. designed the original idea and wrote the manuscript; M.K-L., J.G., J.M. conducted the biological experiments; J.Z. performed the FTIR-ATR and Raman analysis; D.P. performed SEM imaging; I.S. conducted the EPR measurements. All authors have given their approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Data availability

The data sets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bates, P., Yeo, A. & Ramachandran, M. Bone Injury, Healing and Grafting 205–222 (2018).
  • 2.Ferguson C, Alpern E, Miclau T, Helms JA. Does adult fracture repair recapitulate embryonic skeletal formation? Mech. Dev. 1999;87:57–66. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(99)00142-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D, Giannoudis PV. Bone regeneration: Current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011;9:66. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sheen, J. Fracture Healing Overview (2019). [PubMed]
  • 5.Schmidt AH. Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard? Injury. 2021;52:S18–S22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Betz RR. Limitations of autograft and allograft: New synthetic solutions. Orthopedics. 2002;25:s561–570. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20020502-04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Archunan MW, Petronis S. Bone grafts in trauma and orthopaedics. Cureus. 2021;13:e17705. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Campana V, Milano G, Pagano E, Barba M, Cicione C, Salonna G, Lattanzi W, Logroscino G. Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: From basic science to clinical practice. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2014;25:2445–2461. doi: 10.1007/s10856-014-5240-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haugen HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Rossi F, Perale G. Bone grafts: Which is the ideal biomaterial? J. Clin. Periodontol. 2019;46(Suppl 21):92–102. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oden A, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Johansson H. Burden of high fracture probability worldwide: Secular increases 2010–2040. Osteoporos. Int. 2015;26:2243–2248. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chandra G, Pandey A. Design approaches and challenges for biodegradable bone implants: A review. Expert Rev. Med. Devices. 2021 doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1935875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.O'Brien FJ. Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Today. 2011;14:88–95. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Javid-Naderi MJ, Behravan J, Karimi-Hajishohreh N, Toosi S. Synthetic polymers as bone engineering scaffold. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2023;34:2083–2096. doi: 10.1002/pat.6046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Filippi M, Born G, Chaaban M, Scherberich A. Natural polymeric scaffolds in bone regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhou K, Azaman FA, Cao Z, Brennan Fournet M, Devine DM. Bone tissue engineering scaffold optimisation through modification of chitosan/ceramic composition. Macromolecules. 2023;3:326–342. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Regiel-Futyra A, Kus-Liśkiewicz M, Sebastian V, Irusta S, Arruebo M, Kyzioł A, Stochel G. Development of noncytotoxic silver–chitosan nanocomposites for efficient control of biofilm forming microbes. RSC Adv. 2017;7:52398–52413. doi: 10.1039/c7ra08359a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Costa-Pinto AR, Reis RL, Neves NM. Scaffolds based bone tissue engineering: The role of chitosan. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2011;17:331–347. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu Y, Han J, Chai Y, Yuan S, Lin H, Zhang X. Development of porous chitosan/tripolyphosphate scaffolds with tunable uncross-linking primary amine content for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tavakol S, Nikpour B, Amani A, Soltani M, Rabiee SM, Rezayat M, Chen B, Jahanshahi M. Bone regeneration based on nano-hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite/chitosan nanocomposites: An in vitro and in vivo comparative study. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1373-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhou H, Lee J. Nanoscale hydroxyapatite particles for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:2769–2781. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hasegawa S, Ishii S, Tamura J, Furukawa T, Neo M, Matsusue Y, Shikinami Y, Okuno M, Nakamura T. A 5–7 year in vivo study of high-strength hydroxyapatite/poly(l-lactide) composite rods for the internal fixation of bone fractures. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1327–1332. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brun V, Guillaume C, Mechiche Alami S, Josse J, Jing J, Draux F, Bouthors S, Laurent-Maquin D, Gangloff SC, Kerdjoudj H, et al. Chitosan/hydroxyapatite hybrid scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Bio-med. Mater. Eng. 2014;24:63–73. doi: 10.3233/bme-140975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schwechheimer SK, Park EY, Revuelta JL, Becker J, Wittmann C. Biotechnology of riboflavin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016;100:2107–2119. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7256-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Averianova LA, Balabanova LA, Son OM, Podvolotskaya AB, Tekutyeva LA. Production of vitamin B2 (riboflavin) by microorganisms: An overview. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.570828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thakur K, Tomar SK, Singh AK, Mandal S, Arora S. Riboflavin and health: A review of recent human research. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017;57:3650–3660. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1145104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ashoori M, Saedisomeolia A. Riboflavin (vitamin B2) and oxidative stress: A review. Br. J. Nutr. 2014;111:1985–1991. doi: 10.1017/s0007114514000178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Beztsinna N, Solé M, Taib N, Bestel I. Bioengineered riboflavin in nanotechnology. Biomaterials. 2016;80:121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abrahamse H, Hamblin M. New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Biochem. J. 2016;473:347–364. doi: 10.1042/bj20150942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shen J, Liang Q, Su G, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Liang H, Baudouin C, Labbé A. Effect of ultraviolet light irradiation combined with riboflavin on different bacterial pathogens from ocular surface infection. J. Biophys. 2017;2017:3057329. doi: 10.1155/2017/3057329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chaves-Neto A, Yano C, Paredes-Gamero E, Machado D, Justo G, Peppelenbosch M, Ferreira C. Riboflavin and photoproducts in MC3T3-E1 differentiation. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2010;24:1911–1919. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2010.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nandakumar A, Fernandes H, de Boer J, Moroni L, Habibovic P, van Blitterswijk CA. Fabrication of bioactive composite scaffolds by electrospinning for bone regeneration. Macromol. Biosci. 2010;10:1365–1373. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201000145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ji C, Annabi N, Hosseinkhani M, Sivaloganathan S, Dehghani F. Fabrication of poly-dl-lactide/polyethylene glycol scaffolds using the gas foaming technique. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:570–578. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rowlands AS, Lim SA, Martin D, Cooper-White JJ. Polyurethane/poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid composite scaffolds fabricated by thermally induced phase separation. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2109–2121. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Do A-V, Khorsand B, Geary SM, Salem AK. 3D printing of scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2015;4:1742–1762. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.He M, Chang C, Peng N, Zhang L. Structure and properties of hydroxyapatite/cellulose nanocomposite films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012;87:2512–2518. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ber S, Torun Köse G, Hasırcı V. Bone tissue engineering on patterned collagen films: An in vitro study. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1977–1986. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Regiel-Futyra A, Kus-Liśkiewicz M, Sebastian V, Irusta S, Arruebo M, Stochel G, Kyzioł A. Development of noncytotoxic chitosan-gold nanocomposites as efficient antibacterial materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:1087–1099. doi: 10.1021/am508094e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hanson, B. A. ChemoSpec: Exploratory Chemometrics for Spectroscopy. (2022).
  • 39.R Core Team (2020).
  • 40.Gao, L. et al. Preparation of melanin-silver nanocomposites material and its physiological activity in vitro. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1638328/v1 (2022).
  • 41.Kus-Liśkiewicz M, Rzeszutko J, Bobitski Y, Barylyak A, Nechyporenko G, Zinchenko V, Zebrowski J. Alternative approach for fighting bacteria and fungi: Use of modified fluorapatite. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2019;15:848–855. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2019.2725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tahar I, Kus-Liśkiewicz M, Lara Y, Javaux E, Patrick F. Characterization of a non-toxic pyomelanin pigment produced by the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Prog. 2019 doi: 10.1002/btpr.2912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abdul-Monem MM, Kamoun EA, Ahmed DM, El-Fakharany EM, Al-Abbassy FH, Aly HM. Light-cured hyaluronic acid composite hydrogels using riboflavin as a photoinitiator for bone regeneration applications. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 2021;16:529–539. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yu W-Z, Zhang Y, Liu X, Xiang Y, Li Z, Wu S. Synergistic antibacterial activity of multi components in lysozyme/chitosan/silver/hydroxyapatite hybrid coating. Mater. Des. 2018;139:351–362. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kattimani VS, Kondaka S, Lingamaneni KP. Hydroxyapatite—past, present, and future in bone regeneration. Bone Tissue Regener. Insights. 2016;7:BTRI.S36138. doi: 10.4137/btri.s36138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ignjatovic N, Wu V, Ajduković Z, Mihajilov-Krstev T, Uskokovic V, Uskoković D. Chitosan-PLGA polymer blends as coatings for hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and their effect on antimicrobial properties, osteoconductivity and regeneration of osseous tissues. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2016;60:357–364. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rezaei FS, Sharifianjazi F, Esmaeilkhanian A, Salehi E. Chitosan films and scaffolds for regenerative medicine applications: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021;273:118631. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hatami J, Silva SG, Oliveira MB, Costa RR, Reis RL, Mano JF. Multilayered films produced by layer-by-layer assembly of chitosan and alginate as a potential platform for the formation of human adipose-derived stem cell aggregates. Polymers. 2017;9:440. doi: 10.3390/polym9090440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hannink G, Arts JJC. Bioresorbability, porosity and mechanical strength of bone substitutes: What is optimal for bone regeneration? Injury. 2011;42:S22–S25. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abbasi N, Hamlet S, Love RM, Nguyen N-T. Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Devices. 2020;5:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Limmahakhun S, Oloyede A, Sitthiseripratip K, Xiao Y, Yan C. 3D-printed cellular structures for bone biomimetic implants. Addit. Manuf. 2017;15:93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dara PK, Raghavankutty M, Digita P, Sivam V, Kumar L, Mathew S, Ravishankar C, Anandan R. Synthesis and biochemical characterization of silver nanoparticles grafted chitosan (Chi-Ag-NPs): In vitro studies on antioxidant and antibacterial applications. SN Appl. Sci. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s42452-020-2261-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Duarte M, Ferreira C, Marvão M, Rocha J. An optimised method to determine the degree of acetylation and chitosan by FTIR spectroscopy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2003;31:1–8. doi: 10.1016/s0141-8130(02)00039-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hajji S, Younes I, Ghorbel-Bellaaj O, Hajji R, Rinaudo M, Nasri M, Jellouli K. Structural differences between chitin and chitosan extracted from three different marine sources. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014;65:298–306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.01.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lawrie G, Keen I, Drew B, Chandler-Temple A, Rintoul L, Fredericks P, Grøndahl L. Interactions between alginate and chitosan biopolymers characterized using FTIR and XPS. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8:2533–2541. doi: 10.1021/bm070014y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chen F, Wang Z-C, Lin C-J. Preparation and characterization of nano-sized hydroxyapatite particles and hydroxyapatite/chitosan nano-composite for use in biomedical materials. Mater. Lett. 2002;57:858–861. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00885-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.van der Houwen JAM, Cressey G, Cressey BA, Valsami-Jones E. The effect of organic ligands on the crystallinity of calcium phosphate. J. Cryst. Growth. 2003;249:572–583. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0248(02)02227-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Cengiz B, Gokce Y, Yildiz N, Aktas Z, Calimli A. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects. 2008;322:29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Branca C, D'Angelo G, Crupi C, Khouzami K, Rifici S, Ruello G, Wanderlingh U. Role of the OH and NH vibrational groups in polysaccharide-nanocomposite interactions: A FTIR-ATR study on chitosan and chitosan/clay films. Polymer. 2016;99:614–622. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.07.086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Szatkowski T, Kołodziejczak-Radzimska A, Zdarta J, Szwarc-Rzepka K, Paukszta D, Wysokowski M, Ehrlich H, Jesionowski T. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite/chitosan composites. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2015;51:575–585. doi: 10.5277/ppmp150217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhang CY, Chen J, Zhuang Z, Zhang T, Wang XP, Fang QF. In situ hybridization and characterization of fibrous hydroxyapatite/chitosan nanocomposite. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012;124:397–402. doi: 10.1002/app.35103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zarif ME, Yehia-Alexe SA, Bita B, Negut I, Locovei C, Groza A. Calcium phosphates–chitosan composite layers obtained by combining radio-frequency magnetron sputtering and matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation techniques. Polymers. 2022;14:5241. doi: 10.3390/polym14235241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zima A. Hydroxyapatite-chitosan based bioactive hybrid biomaterials with improved mechanical strength. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018;193:175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wolf MMN, Schumann C, Gross R, Domratcheva T, Diller R. Ultrafast infrared spectroscopy of riboflavin: Dynamics, electronic structure, and vibrational mode analysis. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:13424–13432. doi: 10.1021/jp804231c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Katti K, Katti D, Dash R. Synthesis and characterization of a novel chitosan/montmorillonite/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. Biomed. Mater. 2008;3:034122. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kong L, Gao Y, Cao W, Gong Y, Zhao N, Zhang X. Preparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 2005;75A:275–282. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Amaral I, Granja P, Barbosa M. Chemical modification of chitosan by phosphorylation: An XPS, FT-IR and SEM study. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2005;16:1575–1593. doi: 10.1163/156856205774576736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nishi N, Ebina A, Nishimura SI, Tsutsumi A, Hasegawa O, Tokura S. Highly phosphorylated derivatives of chitin, partially deacetylated chitin and chitosan as new functional polymers: Preparation and characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1986;8:311–317. doi: 10.1016/0141-8130(86)90046-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Campos Vallette MM, Diaz FRG, Edwards AM, Kennedy S, Silva E, Derouault J, Rey-Lafon M. Photo-induced generation of the riboflavin-tryptophan adduct and a vibrational interpretation of its structure. Vib. Spectrosc. 1994;6:173–183. doi: 10.1016/0924-2031(94)85004-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Su L, Huang J, Li H, Pan Y, Zhu B, Zhao Y, Liu H. Chitosan-riboflavin composite film based on photodynamic inactivation technology for antibacterial food packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021;172:231–240. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Youness RA, Taha MA, Elhaes H, Ibrahim M. Molecular modeling, FTIR spectral characterization and mechanical properties of carbonated-hydroxyapatite prepared by mechanochemical synthesis. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2017 doi: 10.1016/jmatchemphys201701004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Xue C, Chen Y, Huang Y, Zhu P. Hydrothermal synthesis and biocompatibility study of highly crystalline carbonated hydroxyapatite nanorods. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015;10:316. doi: 10.1186/s11671-015-1018-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Puszczykowska N, Rytlewski P, Macko M, Fiedurek K, Janczak K. Riboflavin as a biodegradable functional additive for thermoplastic polymers. Environments. 2022;9:56. doi: 10.3390/environments9050056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Liang J-Y, Yuann J-MP, Hsie Z-J, Huang S-T, Chen C-C. Blue light induced free radicals from riboflavin in degradation of crystal violet by microbial viability evaluation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2017;174:355–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bartzatt R, Follis M. Detection and assay of riboflavin (vitamin B2) utilizing UV/VIS spectrophotometer and citric acid buffer. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 2014;3:799. doi: 10.9734/jsrr/2014/8598. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhang Y, Sukthankar P, Tomich J, Conrad G. Effect of the synthetic NC-1059 peptide on diffusion of riboflavin across an intact corneal epithelium. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53:2620–2629. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Reis J, Ramos A. In sickness and in health: The oxygen reactive species and the bone. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.745911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Sheppard AJ, Barfield AM, Barton S, Dong Y. Understanding reactive oxygen species in bone regeneration: A glance at potential therapeutics and bioengineering applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.836764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pei J, Zhu S, Liu Y, Song Y, Xue F, Xiong X, Li C. Photodynamic effect of riboflavin on chitosan coatings and the application in pork preservation. Molecules. 2022;27:1355. doi: 10.3390/molecules27041355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tirella A, Liberto T, Ahluwalia A. Riboflavin and collagen: New crosslinking methods to tailor the stiffness of hydrogels. Mater. Lett. 2012;74:58–61. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.01.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sel S, Nass N, Pötzsch S, Trau S, Simm A, Kalinski T, Duncker GIW, Kruse FE, Auffarth GU, Brömme H-J. UVA irradiation of riboflavin generates oxygen-dependent hydroxyl radicals. Redox Rep. 2014;19:72–79. doi: 10.1179/1351000213y.0000000076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chaudhuri S, Batabyal S, Polley N, Pal SK. Vitamin B2 in nanoscopic environments under visible light: Photosensitized antioxidant or phototoxic drug? J. Phys. Chem. A. 2014;118:3934–3943. doi: 10.1021/jp502904r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Radu AI, Kuellmer M, Giese B, Huebner U, Weber K, Cialla-May D, Popp J. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) in food analytics: Detection of vitamins B2 and B12 in cereals. Talanta. 2016;160:289–297. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Junior BRA, Soares FLF, Ardila JA, Durango LGC, Forim MR, Carneiro RL. Determination of B-complex vitamins in pharmaceutical formulations by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018;188:589–595. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2017.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Švecová M, Ulbrich P, Dendisová M, Matějka P. SERS study of riboflavin on green-synthesized silver nanoparticles prepared by reduction using different flavonoids: What is the role of flavonoid used? Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018;195:236–245. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2018.01.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Galdoporpora J, Pérez CJ, Tuttolomondo M, Desimone M. Riboflavin-UVA gelatin crosslinking: Design of a biocompatible and thermo-responsive biomaterial with enhanced mechanical properties for tissue engineering. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2019 doi: 10.5185/amlett.2019.2210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Skóra B, Krajewska U, Nowak A, Dziedzic A, Barylyak A, Kus-Liśkiewicz M. Noncytotoxic silver nanoparticles as a new antimicrobial strategy. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:13451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92812-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Li X, Fu T, Li B, Yan P, Wu Y. Riboflavin-protected ultrasmall silver nanoclusters with enhanced antibacterial activity and the mechanisms. RSC Adv. 2019;9:13275–13282. doi: 10.1039/c9ra02079a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Mak M, Spill F, Kamm RD, Zaman MH. Single-cell migration in complex microenvironments: Mechanics and signaling dynamics. J. Biomech. Eng. 2016 doi: 10.1115/1.4032188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Vicente-Manzanares M, Horwitz AR. Cell migration: An overview. In: Wells CM, Parsons M, editors. Cell Migration: Developmental Methods and Protocols. Humana Press; 2011. pp. 1–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bang M, Kim D, Gonzales E, Kwon KJ, Shin C. Etoposide induces mitochondrial dysfunction and cellular senescence in primary cultured rat astrocytes. Biomolecules Ther. 2019 doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2019.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES