Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1987 Feb;83(2):316–322. doi: 10.1104/pp.83.2.316

Photosynthesis Decrease and Stomatal Control of Gas Exchange in Abies alba Mill. in Response to Vapor Pressure Difference

Jean-Marc Guehl 1,2, Gilbert Aussenac 1,2
PMCID: PMC1056355  PMID: 16665243

Abstract

The responses of steady state CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), and stomatal conductance (gs) to changes in leaf-to-air vapor pressure difference (ΔW) were examined on different dates in shoots from Abies alba trees growing outside. In Ecouves, a provenance representative of wet oceanic conditions in Northern France, both A and gs decreased when ΔW was increased from 4.6 to 14.5 Pa KPa−1. In Nebias, which represented the dry end of the natural range of A. alba in southern France, A and gs decreased only after reaching peak levels at 9.0 and 7.0 Pa KPa−1, respectively. The representation of the data in assimilation rate (A) versus intercellular CO2 partial pressure (Ci) graphs allowed us to determine how stomata and mesophyll photosynthesis interacted when ΔW was increased. Changes in A were primarily due to alterations in mesophyll photosynthesis. At high ΔW, and especially in Ecouves when soil water deficit prevailed, A declined, while Ci remained approximately constant, which may be interpreted as an adjustment of gs to changes in mesophyll photosynthesis. Such a stomatal control of gas exchange appeared as an alternative to the classical feedforward interpretation of E versus ΔW responses with a peak rate of E. The gas exchange response to ΔW was also characterized by considerable deviations from the optimization theory of IR Cowan and GD Farquhar (1977 Symp Soc Exp Biol 31: 471-505).

Full text

PDF
316

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cowan I. R., Farquhar G. D. Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1977;31:471–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hunt E. R., Weber J. A., Gates D. M. Effects of Nitrate Application on Amaranthus powellii Wats : II. Stomatal Response to Vapor Pressure Difference is Consistent with Optimization of Stomatal Conductance. Plant Physiol. 1985 Nov;79(3):614–618. doi: 10.1104/pp.79.3.614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wong S. C., Cowan I. R., Farquhar G. D. Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: I. Influence of Nitrogen Nutrition, Phosphorus Nutrition, Photon Flux Density, and Ambient Partial Pressure of CO(2) during Ontogeny. Plant Physiol. 1985 Aug;78(4):821–825. doi: 10.1104/pp.78.4.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wong S. C., Cowan I. R., Farquhar G. D. Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: II. Effects of Short-Term Exposures to Different Photon Flux Densities. Plant Physiol. 1985 Aug;78(4):826–829. doi: 10.1104/pp.78.4.826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wong S. C., Cowan I. R., Farquhar G. D. Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: III. Influences of Water Stress and Photoinhibition. Plant Physiol. 1985 Aug;78(4):830–834. doi: 10.1104/pp.78.4.830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES