Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 Oct 10;18(10):e0291387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291387

Delay in healthcare seeking for young children with severe pneumonia at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda: A mixed methods cross-sectional study

Phiona Ekyaruhanga 1,2,*, Rebecca Nantanda 2, Hellen T Aanyu 3, John Mukisa 4, Judith Amutuhaire Ssemasaazi 5, Mukeere John 1, Palma Aceng 1, Joseph Rujumba 1
Editor: Kshitij Karki6
PMCID: PMC10564236  PMID: 37816023

Abstract

Background

Globally, pneumonia is the leading infectious cause of under-five mortality, and this can be reduced by prompt healthcare seeking. Data on factors associated with delays in seeking care for children with pneumonia in Uganda is scarce.

Objectives

The study aimed to determine the prevalence, factors associated with delay, barriers, and facilitators of prompt healthcare seeking for children under five years of age with severe pneumonia attending Mulago National Referral Hospital (MNRH) Uganda.

Methods

A mixed methods cross-sectional study was conducted among 384 caregivers of children with severe pneumonia at MNRH. Quantitative data was collected using interviewer-administered structured questionnaires and qualitative data through focus group discussions with caregivers. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence of delay in care seeking. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the factors that were independently associated with delay in seeking healthcare. Content thematic analysis was used to analyze for barriers and facilitators of prompt healthcare seeking.

Results

The prevalence of delay in seeking healthcare was 53.6% (95% CI: 48.6–58.6). Long distance to a hospital (AOR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.22–3.01, p value = 0.003), first seeking care elsewhere (AOR = 3.33, 95% CI 1.85–6.01, p value = 0.001), and monthly income ≤100,000 UGX (28 USD) (AOR = 2.27,95% CI 1.33–3.86, p value = 0.003) were independently associated with delay in seeking healthcare. Limited knowledge of symptoms, delayed referrals, self-medication, and low level of education were barriers to prompt healthcare seeking while recognition of symptoms of severe illness in the child, support from spouses, and availability of money for transport were key facilitators of early healthcare seeking.

Conclusion

This study showed that more than half of the caregivers delayed seeking healthcare for their children with pneumonia symptoms. Caregivers who first sought care elsewhere, lived more than 5 km from the hospital, and earned less than 28 USD per month were more likely to delay seeking healthcare for their children with severe pneumonia. Limited knowledge of symptoms of pneumonia, self-medication, and delayed referral hindered prompt care-seeking. Key facilitators of prompt care-seeking were accessibility to health workers, support from spouses, and recognition of symptoms of severe illness in children. There is a need for programs that educate caregivers about pneumonia symptoms, in children less than five years.

Introduction

Pneumonia is the leading infectious cause of death among children less than five years globally [14] with an estimated two children dying every minute. In 2020, global estimates indicated that over 800,000 children less than five years died of pneumonia [5]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the African region has the highest number, accounting for more than half of all deaths from childhood pneumonia [6]. In Uganda, pneumonia is the leading cause of child morbidity and mortality [7, 8]. Studies have indicated high pneumonia case fatality rates ranging between 10%-30% [911]. In 2018, a total of 95,413 admissions in the country were due to pneumonia, representing 13.4% of overall admissions in this age group. The outcome in 1,508 (9.5%) of the admissions was death [12].

Seeking healthcare within 24 hours of developing pneumonia symptoms is key to the prevention of complications and deaths in children less than five years [13]. However, this remains a big challenge in healthcare settings in low-income countries, thus contributing to preventable pneumonia-associated deaths [11]. This is despite the WHO-led strategies like the Integrated Community Case Management (iCCM) currently implemented in many parts of Uganda [14]. Delay, defined as seeking healthcare from a hospital or health center, after 24 hours of the onset of the pneumonia symptoms, may lead to worsening symptoms, severe complications like loss of consciousness, hypoxemia, convulsions, and in worst cases death [11]. The “three delays” model that was originally proposed to describe the determinants of maternal mortality [15] has been previously applied to understand delays in seeking care among caregivers of children with pneumonia in the Peruvian Amazons [16]. The model describes the first delay as a delay in deciding to seek appropriate care, the second as a delay in identifying and reaching the health facility, and the third as a delay in receiving healthcare once in the health facility. The model suggests that individuals who experience any of the delays may miss prompt receipt of appropriate care and are at high risk of severe complications like hypoxemia, loss of consciousness, and death [15, 16].

Studies in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Bangladesh showed delays in care-seeking for children with pneumonia in 48.6%, 62.1%, and 52.7% of cases respectively [1719]. In these studies, the factors that were associated with delay in seeking care included; the cost of services or treatment, transportation costs and loss of wages incurred while taking the child to a hospital, sex of caregiver and social norms, insufficient knowledge of danger signs and illness severity, previous experiences with health services, child’s age, and sex, maternal education, maternal employment status, decision-making status, use of self-prescribed antibiotics, gender roles, rural residence, perceived quality of health services, cultural beliefs about the illness and perceived illness severity [11, 1821]. In Eastern Uganda, a case-series study found that the majority of children with severe forms of pneumonia often reported to treatment centers after 3 days from the onset of symptoms [11]. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of delay in seeking care for young children with severe pneumonia and explore the associated factors, in a tertiary care hospital in Uganda.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

This was a mixed-methods cross-sectional study among 384 caregivers of children less than five years with severe pneumonia presenting at the paediatric emergency unit of Mulago Hospital, Kampala, between December 2020 and June 2021. Mulago Hospital is a National Referral Hospital in Uganda and a teaching hospital for the Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala. It is the largest public hospital in Uganda with 1,500 beds [22]. Although it is a national referral, many patients especially those from Kampala city and surrounding districts use it as their first point of formal care. The paediatric emergency unit is a 50-bed capacity unit comprised of the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and, high and low-dependency wards. Children aged 1 day up to 12 years of age are usually admitted for 24 hours, given immediate treatment, and transferred to other paediatric wards for continued management. Paediatricians, paediatric residents, medical officers, intern doctors, and nurses provide care for this unit. Parents or caregivers of sick children seek care at the paediatric emergency unit either as referrals or as the first contact with the formal health system. An estimated 109 of 160 (68%) children with severe pneumonia seen at the paediatric emergency unit every month use it as the first point of formal healthcare.

Sample size estimation

The sample size to determine the prevalence of delay in seeking healthcare was estimated using the formula for single proportions. We assumed a 95% level of confidence, 5% sampling error, proportion of caregivers that delayed seeking healthcare for their children of 47.7% [11]. This gave an estimated sample size of 384. In addition, we estimated the sample size for determining factors associated with delay in seeking healthcare based on the formula for comparison of two proportions using use of self-medication as the exposure variable [19]. We assumed 5% significance, 80% power of the study, proportion of caregivers who had used self-medication was 25.6% versus 74.4% that had not used self-medication. The proportion of caregivers that had used self-medication and had delayed seeking healthcare was estimated at 78.7% while those that did not use self-medication but delayed was 42.1%. Based on these parameters, the estimated sample size was 66. The higher sample size of 384 based on the Kish Leslie formula was considered appropriate for the study.

To explore the barriers and facilitators of prompt care seeking, four Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) each comprising 6 participants were carried out at the end of which saturation [23] was reached where no new insights were emerging. All eligible study participants agreed to participate when approached.

Sampling and eligibility criteria

The consecutive method of sampling was used. Eligible caregivers of children under-five with severe pneumonia were enrolled consecutively until the desired sample size was achieved. In line with the WHO definition of severe pneumonia, caregivers whose children, aged 1–59 months, presented with cough and/or difficulty breathing and at least one danger sign of; peripheral arterial oxygen saturation <90%, central cyanosis, severe respiratory distress, inability to drink or breastfeed, vomiting everything, loss of consciousness and convulsion [24] were eligible.

For the FGDs, purposive sampling was used to select caregivers based on their age and ability to use the common local language, Luganda. The choice of age groups for the caregivers was based on previous studies which showed variation in care-seeking between young caregivers below 30 years and those above 30 years [25, 26]. Participants were all female since the majority of the caregivers were female. Stratification by gender was not done because it was not feasible to have male participants in one group as throughout the study only 10 male participants were enrolled.

Recruitment of study participants

Participants were identified by review of records (patient register) at the paediatric emergency unit. The patient register is managed by the records personnel who sits at the admission desk and is responsible for recording the diagnosis documented in the file by the admitting doctor and assigning file numbers for admitted patients. The personnel updates this register as patients come and are admitted. Once they had been admitted and settled in, the PI or research assistant assessed the identified patients using a screening tool to confirm that they met the WHO case definition of severe pneumonia to verify their eligibility before enrolment.

To explore the barriers and facilitators of prompt healthcare seeking, participants for the FGDs were recruited from caregivers whose children were still undergoing inpatient management for severe pneumonia. These were identified by a review of the inpatient ward registry.

Operational definitions

Delay in seeking healthcare for pneumonia

seeking healthcare at a hospital or health center after 24 hours from when the caregiver recognized the signs and symptoms of pneumonia (cough and/or breathing difficulties).

Self-medication

refers to when mothers recognize that their child is ill and give treatment without a medical prescription.

Severe pneumonia

cough and/or difficulty in breathing with any one of the following; peripheral arterial oxygen saturation < 90%, central cyanosis, severe respiratory distress, inability to drink or breastfeed or vomiting everything, loss of consciousness, and convulsions [24].

Caregiver

someone who attends to the needs of a child and takes responsibility for their well-being. This was an individual who sought care for a sick child.

Study variables

Outcome variable

Delay in seeking healthcare by caregivers was a binary outcome characterized as Delay or No Delay. A child was considered delayed if they were taken to a health facility more than 24 hours after the of onset pneumonia symptoms; cough and/or difficulty in breathing as reported by the caregiver.

Independent variables

Demographic factors. The demographic factors considered in this study were; age and sex of the child, age and sex of the caregiver, relationship of caregiver to child, marital status, family size, and birth order of the child.

The socioeconomic factors. Education level, occupation, and estimated monthly income of the caregiver.

Socio-cultural factors and perceptions. Power relations/decision-making at home, use of traditional medicines, and self-medication.

Health system factors. These included distance to the hospital as estimated by the interviewer using google maps after asking for the residence of the caregiver, quality of care, and staff attitudes as perceived by the caregiver.

Data collection procedures

The identified caregivers were approached to give written informed consent to participate in the study. Quantitative data was collected by the principal investigator and two trained research assistants (nurses) using a pre-tested interviewer administered structured questionnaire. The questionnaire included socio-demographic characteristics of caregivers and children, child clinical characteristics, caregiver health-seeking behavioral characteristics, and perceptions of caregivers on the health system.

Qualitative data was collected by two researchers, one as a facilitator and the other as a note-taker. Focus group discussions were conducted from a quiet side room away from the ward. After obtaining written consent, the moderator used a FGD guide to explore the perceptions of the respondents regarding the barriers and facilitators of seeking prompt healthcare for children under-five with severe pneumonia. The discussions were conducted in Luganda, which is the common local language spoken in the study setting. Each FGD lasted on average 1 hour. The discussions were audio-recorded.

Data management and analysis

Before data was collected, the case report forms (CRF) were pre-tested on 10 caregivers of children with severe pneumonia in the paediatric emergency unit to check for understanding and completeness and were revised accordingly. Data was collected using hard copy CRF. All completed CRF and other study records such as consent forms and study registers were filed appropriately and locked in the study cabinets to which only the study team had access. Data was checked regularly for quality and completeness by the principal investigator, and any issues arising were addressed immediately or during research team meetings.

Quantitative data was entered in Epidata version 4.2 by two independent data entry clerks and exported to Stata version 14 for cleaning and analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the participant characteristics and results expressed as proportions, means, and medians, as appropriate. Shapiro Wilks test was used to determine skewness of the different variables and the continuous variables that were not normally distributed were expressed as medians. To determine the prevalence of delay in seeking healthcare, the number of caregivers who brought their children to a health center or hospital beyond 24 hours of onset of symptoms, was divided by the total number of participants, and the result was expressed as a proportion. To determine the factors associated with delay in seeking healthcare, multivariable analysis was undertaken. A logistic regression model was built by including all factors with p<0.2 at bivariate analysis for multivariable analysis. p≤0.05 at multivariable analysis was considered statistically significant. All statistical tests were 2-sided and considered statistically significant at α = 0.05. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p values are presented. Interaction was assessed using likelihood ratios comparing full and reduced models whereas confounding was assessed by comparing adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios and a predictor variable with a difference of ≥10% was considered as a confounder. Conclusions were drawn based on the adjusted OR with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Goodness of fit of the final model was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

The qualitative data was analyzed using content thematic approach in line with the study objectives. Transcripts were read several times to identify themes and sub-themes. Coding was done manually by PE in consultation with JR. This was done by grouping data in line with the themes and sub-themes. Verbatim quotations reflecting participants’ views on barriers and facilitators of prompt care seeking for children with severe pneumonia were identified and have been used in the presentation of the study findings.

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the Makerere University School of Medicine Research Ethics Committee (REF 2020–192). Administrative clearance was obtained from Mulago National Referral Hospital research ethics committee and the in-charges of the Paediatric wards. Informed consent was obtained from each of the caregivers. The confidentiality of participants was ensured by using serial numbers instead of names and by restriction of access to raw data to the principal investigator and research assistants only. Throughout the conduct of the study, we adhered to the MOH guidelines for the prevention and control of COVID-9.

Results

Characteristics of the study participants

A total of 384 caregivers of children under five years of age with severe pneumonia participated in the study. The median age of participants was 27 years (IQR 24–33) with the youngest caregiver being 16 years old and the oldest 75 years. Most caregivers (97.4%) were female. The details are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of caregivers of children less than five years with severe pneumonia at Mulago National Referral Hospital (N = 384).

Characteristic Median (IQR) Frequency(n) Percentage (%)
Sex of caregiver      
Male   10 2.6
Female   374 97.4
Age of caregiver (years) 27(24–33)    
Education status      
None   9 2.3
Primary   142 37
Secondary (O and A level)   199 51.8
University/tertiary   34 8.9
Marital status      
Single   32 8.3
Married/cohabiting   329 85.7
Divorced/separated   18 4.7
Others (widow/widower)   5 1.3
Distance from home to hospital
≤ 5km 138 35.9
˃ 5km 246 64.1
Employment status      
Employed 213 55.5
Unemployed   171 44.5
Family size 5(3–6)    
Estimated monthly income in Uganda Shillings    
> 200,000 (56 USD) 81 21.1
100,001–200,000 (28–56 USD) 45 11.7
0–100,000 (28 USD) 258 67.2
Decision maker at home
Father 20 5.2
Mother 109 28.4
Both parents 228 59.4
Grandparents 22 5.7
Aunt or uncle 4 1.0
Others (neighbors) 1 0.3

Characteristics of children less than five years with severe pneumonia

The majority of the children were male (54.4%). The median age was 9 months (IQR 4–18) with the youngest child being one month old and the oldest 57 months old. The caregiver was the mother for most of the children (94%) as shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Demographic characteristics of children (N = 384).

Characteristic Median (IQR) Frequency(n) Percentage (%)
Sex of the child      
Male   209 54.4
Female   175 45.6
Age of child (months)  9 (4–18)    
Child’s Birth order      
First   100 26
Second   96 25
Third   73 19
Fourth   51 13.3
Fifth   29 7.5
Others* 35 9.1
Caregiver      
Father   9 2.3
Mother   361 94.0
Uncle/aunt   2 0.5
Grandparent   11 2.9
Other (neighbor) 1 0.3

*Others include above fifth born and unknown. A woman in Uganda has 5 children on average.

Prevalence of delay in healthcare seeking among caregivers of children less than five years with severe pneumonia at MNRH

The proportion of caregivers who sought care from a hospital or health center, after 24 hours of the onset of pneumonia symptoms was 53.6% (95% CI: 48.6–58.6) as shown in Fig 1 below.

Fig 1. Prevalence of delay in seeking healthcare by caregivers of children under five with severe pneumonia at MNRH.

Fig 1

Clinical characteristics of children

The majority of the children (82%) had severe respiratory distress (severe chest wall-indrawing, grunting, nasal flaring) and 25.5% had hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90%). Details are shown in Table 3

Table 3. Clinical characteristics of children under five with severe pneumonia at MNRH.

Characteristic Frequency(n) Percentage (%)
Severe respiratory distress
No 69 18.0
Yes 315 82.0
Hypoxemia (SpO 2 <90%)
No 286 74.5
Yes 98 25.5
Convulsions
No 356 92.7
Yes 28 7.3
Loss of consciousness
No 374 97.4
Yes 10 2.6
Inability to drink/eat or breastfeed
No 234 60.9
Yes 150 39.1
Vomiting everything
No 284 74.0
Yes 100 26.0
Cyanosis
No 383 99.7
Yes 1 0.3
Fever
No 76 19.8
Yes 308 80.2
Others *
No 281 73.2
Yes 103 26.8

*Others: nasal discharge, nasal congestion

Health-seeking behavioral characteristics of caregivers

The majority of the caregivers (82.8%) first sought care from other sources like drug shops, and pharmacies before going to a health center/hospital as shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Health-seeking behavioral characteristics of caregivers of children under five with severe pneumonia at MNRH.

Characteristic Frequency(n) Percentage (%)
Self-medication ®
No 316 82.3
Yes 68 17.7
Antipyretics
Yes 167 43.5
No 217 56.5
Antibiotics
Yes 95 24.7
No 289 75.3
Cough syrups
Yes 96 30.4
No 288 69.6
Antimalarial
Yes 52 16.5
No 332 83.5
Use of traditional medicine °
Yes 92 29.2
No 292 70.8
First form of care sought
Elsewhere* 318 82.8
Hospital/ health center 66 17.2
Had received information about early care seeking #
Yes 317 82.5
No 67 17.5

*Elsewhere: seeking care from drug shops, clinics, pharmacies, spiritual healers, or traditional healers/herbalists.

#Sources of information included health centers, neighbors, media, and relatives.

°Traditional medicine: included use of local herbs, and food remedies like raw eggs, ground garlic, and ginger to cure disease

®Self-medication: caregivers recognizing that their child is ill and giving treatment without a medical prescription.

Child factors associated with delay in seeking healthcare

From Table 5, being female and age 2–12 months were associated with delay in seeking healthcare at bivariate analysis.

Table 5. Child factors associated with delay in seeking healthcare by caregivers of children less than five years with severe pneumonia attending MNRH.

Characteristic No delay, n (%) n = 178 Delay, n (%) n = 206 Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) p-value
Sex of the child        
Male 110 (52.6) 99 (47.4) 1  
Female 68 (38.9) 107 (61.1) 1.75 (1.16–2.62) 0.007
Age of child in months         
< 2 17 (56.7) 13 (43.3) 1
2–12 84 (41.4) 119 (58.6) 1.85 (0.85–4.02) 0.119
>12–59 77 (51.0) 74 (49.0) 1.25 (0.57–2.77) 0.570
Immunization status        
Up to date* 170 (47.1) 191 (52.9) 1  
Not up to date 8 (34.8) 15 (65.2) 1.67 (0.69–4.04) 0.255
Inability to drink/eat or breastfeed
Yes 72 (48.0) 78 (52.0) 1
No 106 (45.3) 128 (54.7) 1.12 (0.74–1.68) 0.605
Fever
Yes 143 (46.4) 165 (53.6) 1
No 35 (46.1) 41 (53.9) 1.01 (0.61–1.68) 0.953
Convulsions        
Yes 10 (35.7) 18 (64.3) 1
No 168 (47.2) 188 (52.8) 0.62 (0.28–1.38) 0.245
Vomiting everything        
Yes 41 (41.0) 59 (59.0) 1
No 137 (48.2) 147 (51.8) 0.75 (0.47–1.18) 0.213

* Up to date immunization status is when a child has received all vaccines appropriate for age according to the Uganda vaccination program schedule.

Caregiver factors associated with delay in seeking healthcare by caregivers of children under five with severe pneumonia attending MNRH

Living more than 5km from the hospital (AOR 1.94, 95%CI 1.24–3.01, p = 0.003), low-income status (AOR 2.27, 95%CI 1.33–3.86, p = 0.003), and first seeking care from other sources (AOR 3.33, 95%CI 1.85–6.01, p = 0.001) were likely to delay seeking healthcare by caregivers, as shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Factors associated with delay in healthcare seeking for children under years with severe pneumonia attending MNRH.

Characteristic No delay, n (%) n = 178 Delay, n (%) n = 206 Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) p-value Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) p-value
Age of the caregiver (years)        
≤27 84 (42.2) 115 (57.8) 1.35 (0.87–2.09) 0.180
28–37 68 (49.6) 69 (50.4) 1  
38 and above 26 (54.2) 22 (45.8) 0.83 (0.43–1.61) 0.589
Distance from hospital^        
≤ 5 km 80 (58.0) 58 (42.0) 1   1
>5 km 98 (39.8) 148 (60.2) 2.08 (1.36–3.18) 0.001 1.94 (1.24–3.01) 0.003
Estimated monthly income in Uganda Shillings©        
>200,000 (56 USD) 51 (63.0) 30 (37.0) 1   1
100,001–200,000 (28–56 USD) 16 (20.5) 62 (79.5) 3.08 (1.48–6.58) 0.002 3.29 (1.49–7.24) 0.003
0–100,000 (28 USD) 111 (43.0) 147 (57.0) 2.25 (1.34–3.76) 0.002 2.27 (1.33–3.86) 0.003
Education status    
None 3(33.3) 6 (66.7) 3.23 (0.69–15.21) 0.138
Primary 61 (43.0) 81 (57.0) 2.14 (0.99–4.62) 0.051
Secondary (O and A level) 93 (46.7) 106 (53.3) 1.84 (0.87–3.88) 0.109
University/tertiary 21 (61.8) 13 (38.2) 1
Marital status         
Married/cohabiting 159 (48.3) 170 (51.7) 1
Single/widow 13 (35.1) 24 (64.9) 1.73 (0.85–3.51) 0.131
Divorced/separated 6 (33.3) 12 (66.7) 1.87 (0.68–5.10) 0.221
First form of care sought        
Hospital/ health center 46 (69.7) 20 (30.3) 1   1
Elsewhere* 132 (41.5) 186 (58.5) 3.24 (1.83–5.73) 0.001 3.33(1.85–6.01) 0.001
Self-medication        
No 42 (61.8) 26 (38.2) 1  
Yes 136 (43.0) 180 (57.0) 2.13 (1.25–3.66) 0.006
Antibiotics use        
No 142 (49.1) 147 (50.9) 1  
Yes 36 (37.9) 59 (62.1) 1.58 (0.98–2.54) 0.058
Use of cough syrups        
No 101 (45.9) 119 (54.1) 1  
Yes 35 (36.5) 61 (63.5) 1.48 (0.90–2.42) 0.120

*Elsewhere: drug shops, clinics, pharmacies, spiritual healers, herbalists

ΛMinistry of Health Uganda recommends a health facility to be within a 5km radius of the population [27].

©Poverty line in Uganda is 1 USD per day (about 100,000 UGX per month) and the World Bank poverty line is 1.9 USD per day (about 200,000 UGX per month) [28].

Barriers and facilitators of seeking healthcare promptly for children under five years with severe pneumonia attending MNRH

The facilitators were grouped at the individual level (recognition of symptoms, availability of money for transport), family/relations level (advice from family and friends, supportive spouses), and health organizations level (early identification of danger signs and referral, availability of skilled health workers, functional triage systems, good quality of health care provided), as shown in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Facilitators of prompt care-seeking for children under five with severe pneumonia.

Fig 2

Recognition of symptoms of severe illness in the child

Most caregivers were prompted to seek care upon recognition of symptoms of difficulty breathing which they interpreted as indicators of severe illness as some mothers explained:

…his breathing was so tight almost like grunting which was initially not there. Now there that is where every parent (myself) realizes that eeh…. I need a hospital”-FGD 1, caregivers ≤ 30 years

… the child’s condition is what forces you to go. The way the child breathes freaks you out” FGD 3, caregivers ≤ 30 years

Availability of money for transport

Availability of money for transport was another facilitator highlighted by participants. One young mother elaborated:

If you have the money to start with, you cannot delay. When the child is not okay at night, the mother can’t sleep and that is the truth” FGD 3, caregivers ≤ 30 years

Advice from relatives and friends

Advice from relatives and friends was another facilitator of prompt care-seeking mentioned by participants. Advice from family and community elders was considered important because they had experience raising and taking care of children and would guide possible courses of action. The family and the community members took the child’s health as a part of their responsibility:

there was an elderly woman in our village who told me that most probably my child had pneumonia when I told her about the child’s illness. She advised me to take the child to the hospital where there were skilled doctors and even if I do not find medicine; I should go and buy it. So, I went there”-FGD 1, caregivers ≤ 30 years

Supportive spouses

Participants noted that some fathers actively participated in organizing and arranging for prompt movement to the hospital in cases where they were at home when the child’s condition deteriorated. The fathers often accompanied the mother and child to the hospital as one young mother explained:

When the child fell ill, I did not see that maybe he was breathing badly, but I woke up and he cried and vomited. His father woke up, dressed up the baby, and said that the next thing we drive the child to hospital” FGD 1, caregivers ≤ 30 years.

Prompt identification of danger signs and referral

For some caregivers who first sought care from drug shops or clinics, health workers took a keen interest in identifying the children who needed to be referred which aided in prompt appropriate care-seeking. Those with difficulty in breathing were often quickly referred for further management as one mother explained:

When I reached the clinic, the doctor looked at him in the chest, he was breathing fast and there was a depression and he was breathing badly. He said ‘I cannot put him here these children are tricky. Let me send you to Mulago’ FDG 3, caregivers ≤ 30 years

Availability of skilled healthcare workers in hospitals

Another facilitator of prompt seeking of healthcare was the availability of skilled healthcare providers at the hospital.

For me to get the qualified doctor to treat my child well, I will not get them from other health facilities. So, I immediately go the government hospital (Mulago) “FGD 1, caregivers ≤ 30 years

Another young mother further explained:

Government hospitals usually have learned (qualified) health workers. They know what they are doing. Even if he doesn’t give you medicine but writes on paper, that medicine works” FGD 3, caregivers ≤ 30 years

Perceived quality of healthcare

Participants reported that the quality of the healthcare they hoped to receive at a hospital/health facility was integral in encouraging them to seek healthcare promptly. They linked prompt care-seeking to the past positive experience they had seeking care as one mother explained:

Me I want to thank the health workers here because every time you come, they really care especially when they see that the child is breathing badly. That is why I pass private drug shops and clinics and I decide to come here immediately” FDG 1, caregivers ≤ 30

Barriers to prompt care-seeking health care for children under five years with severe pneumonia attending MNRH

Several barriers to prompt healthcare seeking for children with severe pneumonia were mentioned. In line with the three delays model, these were grouped into the first delay, second delay, and third delay. Delay 1: Decision to seek help i) poor knowledge of symptoms ii) low level of education iii) self-medication iv) first seeking care at the nearest drug shops and clinics; Delay 2: Reach a health facility i) delayed referral ii) long distance to the hospital; Delay 3: Receive appropriate help i) unavailability of drugs ii) poor triage iii) unfriendly health workers and iv) unavailability of health workers. As shown in Fig 3.

Fig 3. Barriers to prompt care seeking for children under five with severe pneumonia.

Fig 3

Delay 1: Delay in the decision to seek health care services

Failure to recognize pneumonia symptoms. Participants described challenges in identifying pneumonia symptoms among their children. Some reported taking a longer period without noticing changes in their child’s symptomatology as some mothers explained.

“Initially I thought it was just cough. I took him to a clinic and the health worker saw him and said “your child is breathing badly” and I said “that is how he usually is” he said “no this is not normal breathing” FDG 1, caregivers ≤ 30 years

Self-medication. Caregivers mentioned using self-prescribed medications they had previously used to treat respiratory conditions to manage the current pneumonia-like illness. They described using their previous experiences to inform their choices of medicines for their children.

You are used that each time the child gets cough or flu, you normally treat it yourself with Panadol and syrups without first going to the hospital and that may also result in a delay to go to the hospital” FDG 4, caregivers > 30 years

Unsupportive spouse. Participants reported that the lack of participation and support of their male partners delayed their decision to seek care for their children with severe pneumonia. The lack of support and encouragement by their spouses often left the mothers at crossroads as they lacked finances for transport and meeting hospital costs or were told not to go to hospital as some mothers explained:

When your child is sick, he (father) first stops you from coming to hospital due to fear of asking for money from him. He then tells you to go to buy some tablets and give the child. You are in such a situation yet the child is worsening” FGD 4, caregivers > 30 years

Poor advice from friends and relatives. Poor advice by friends and family members was regarded as a cause of delay in taking sick children to the hospital. Caregivers explained that they took advice from relatives, friends, and neighbors because they trusted them and did not want to disagree with them. In some cases, the illnesses were perceived as needing herbal medicine thus leading to delays in seeking care for children with severe pneumonia as some mothers explained:

A friend can mislead you saying let us go there and pick some herbs that you give to the child. You keep concocting your own medicine while the child is getting problems”-FGD 3, caregiver ≤ 30 years

You may first seek advice from your friends who are mothers and ask for guidance from them about the child’s current symptoms before coming to hospital and you delay.” FDG 2, caregiver > 30 years

Low level of education. Another barrier to caregivers deciding to seek healthcare was their low level of education. Instead, caregivers resorted to buying medication such as Paracetamol and syrups from drug shops as some caregivers mentioned:

…most of us are illiterate. For me, each time my child would fall sick I would just go and buy some medication from the pharmacy hoping that the child would get better” FDG 4, caregivers > 30 years.

Other barriers to the prompt decision to seek care found in this study were the unavailability of health workers and the fear of high cost of service.

Second delay: Delay in identifying and reaching a healthcare facility

Lack of means of transport. Participants mentioned that they lacked means of transportation to get to a hospital. Many described their ordeal of helplessness when they needed to move especially at night as one mother narrated.

Sometimes the transport means prevent us from coming. Because mine started at 10 pm. You cannot move at that time. I had to wait for it to reach morning then I started moving” FDG 3, caregivers ≤ 30 years.

Limited financial resources. Caregivers cited limited access to financial resources as a major barrier to early care-seeking. Mothers reported going to nearby pharmacies to seek quick remedies for their children’s ill health. This was because they did not have enough money to cater for transport costs to a health facility.

. I was busy asking for septrin. I thought it could relieve the breathing for some days until I got money for transport to bring me here” FGD 3, caregivers ≤ 30 years

Similarly, some caregivers were unable to reach the hospital due to a lack of money to pay for hospital and transportation. In some cases, donations and fundraising drives from friends and well-wishers were done to enable the caregivers to bring the child to the hospital.

We had to first look for money for the hospital before we came. People had to contribute for us to come”-FGD 4 caregivers > 30 years.

“.. You find the child has fallen sick and is stuck at home but all because of the pocket (lack of money)-FGD 1, caregivers ≤ 30 years.

Delayed referral to a higher-level facility. Caregivers of children with severe pneumonia experienced delays in referral from drug shops and clinics where they first sought care, to health centers and hospitals. The duration of delay ranged between 3 days to a week before children were referred to Mulago hospital. This (delayed referral) was even experienced in situations where children were not improving on the prescribed medicines. As some mothers narrated:

…we spent a week going to a drug shop. The cough and difficulty in breathing were there. The health worker at the drug shop then said “take him to the skilled doctors at Mulago who will work on him because we have given him injections, it has failed, we have given him syrups, they have failed. I have nothing to do for you now, just take the child”. When we brought him here, they checked him and said he had pneumonia” FDG 1, caregivers ≤ 30 years.

Long-distance to hospital. Participants in the FGDs highlighted challenges of accessibility to the health facility. They often gave up coming to the hospital and preferred to go to the clinics near their home. This is described in the quote:

Another reason is the distance to the health facility. You may find that the clinic near home may not give you the desired results yet the better hospital for instance Mulago is far. So, you go to the nearby clinic and end up delaying to reach the hospital.”- FGD 4, caregivers > 30 years

Third delay: Delay in receiving prompt and adequate health care services

Low level of education (cannot communicate with health worker). Some caregivers talked about communication challenges in their interactions with healthcare providers. They mentioned that the language barrier led to an inability to disclose their child’s symptoms to the clinician causing delays in the administration of appropriate care as one caregiver mentioned:

Now if you find me who did not go to school and you (nurse) tell me in English, I cannot hear and understand it. I do not know it. The nurse asked me questions about my child but I was incapacitated and I started thinking about my child dying from here”-FGD 1, caregivers ≤ 30 years.

Poor triage system. While in the hospital, the clinicians and nursing staff were mentioned as delaying to identify children at high risk of death if not given urgent help. Caregivers with highly critical children spent long waiting times in the queue and in some situations became restless to get the much-needed care. Where the very sick children were triaged, incomplete attention to give them prompt care was often the case distressing the caregivers as two mothers described:

My child was very sick. I had waited for so long without being called out of the line (to see the doctor). I just got up at once and entered the doctor’s room”–FGD 2, caregivers > 30 years

Some health workers are careless about emergencies. Some health workers are lazy. For example, you may reach the hospital and the health worker may pass by your child thinking it is the usual illness and not bothered. I felt so bad as my child kept worsening in the queue”-FGD 4, caregivers > 30 years

Unavailability of drugs. Participants expressed concern that the health facilities were not well stocked with medicines for the management of pneumonia in children. They cited instances of having to source medications from pharmacies outside the hospital at a cost that led to delays in children receiving appropriate care.

Am the mother and father of this child. Sometimes you reach the hospital and there is no medicine and the nurse tells you to go and buy it. However, you have no single coin.” FGD 1, caregivers ≤ 30 years

Unfriendly health workers. Another perceived barrier to prompt seeking of health care among the caregivers of children with pneumonia was the bad conduct of some health care providers.

The health worker barked at me saying ‘Why have you brought the child here without weighing him first?’ Even though my child had come in the ambulance on oxygen. I spent much time there as she was tossing me here and here.” FGD 4, caregivers > 30 years.

Unavailability of health workers. Sometimes, the caregivers reached the hospital and met few health workers compared to the number of patients in the queue. Their children took longer than usual to receive diagnoses and the prescribed medication, which left them apprehensive about whether their children will recover from their illnesses on time. As a younger mother told us:

The queue is long, the health workers are usually few and sometimes they are not around. I was worried for my child’s health the longer I stayed in the line.”-FGD3, caregivers ≤ 30 years.

Discussion

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of delay in seeking care for children with severe pneumonia, describe the associated factors, as well as facilitators and barriers. We found that more than half of the caregivers delayed seeking healthcare for their children with severe pneumonia. The prevalence of delay in this study is higher than that found by Kallander and colleagues in a cross-sectional study done in rural eastern Uganda and a study in Rwanda where 47.7% and 35% of the caregivers delayed seeking care for their children with pneumonia symptoms respectively [11, 29]. It is also higher than the prevalence from a similar setting in Kenya in which the prevalence of delayed care seeking was 46.2% [30]. However, other studies in Ethiopia and Kenya found a higher prevalence of more than 60% [17, 31]. The findings from all the above studies clearly show that delay in seeking healthcare for children with pneumonia remains a big problem in sub-Saharan Africa and this leads to deaths that could otherwise be averted by prompt care seeking.

Factors associated with delay in seeking care

Caregivers who lived more than 5km from the hospital were nearly twice more likely to delay in seeking care compared to those who lived within 5km. Similar findings were noted in studies in Kenya, Peruvian Amazon, and slums in Uganda [16, 17, 32]. WHO recommends that the average distance from homes to the nearest facility should not be more than 5km [27], and this has been shown to improve healthcare seeking [33].

Poverty, as measured by the level of monthly income, was significantly associated with delay in seeking healthcare. Caregivers who earned less than 100,000 Uganda Shillings (28 USD) were 2.27 times more likely to delay seeking care compared to those who earned more. The findings from the qualitative data further confirm that limited financial resources is a key barrier to prompt seeking of healthcare among caregivers of children less than five years with severe pneumonia. These findings are similar to those found in Ethiopia and Nigeria [19, 34]. In low- and middle-income countries like Uganda, poverty influences an individual’s choice of when and how to seek healthcare for a sick infant [35]. In many situations, lack of finances leads to the deterioration of children with pneumonia or those suffering from other poverty-related conditions like acute malnutrition and diarrhea causing morbidity and mortality. Our study participants had a low monthly income and no health insurance, which may have predisposed them to delays in seeking care for pneumonia symptoms.

The other significant factor found to be associated with delay in seeking healthcare was first seeking care from other sources like drug shops, pharmacies, and herbalists before going to a hospital. The caregivers who sought care elsewhere before coming to hospital were 3 times more likely to delay compared to those who came straight to hospital. Many reported first going to drug shops, pharmacies, and even herbalists. This finding is consistent with other studies that examined determinants of prompt care-seeking in Africa and Asia [11, 29, 3639]. Possible explanations for this finding in our study may be due to the high number of drug shops in this urban area, proximity of drug shops to caregivers’ homes, lack of knowledge on adverse consequences of herbal medicine and use of non-prescribed medication as well as perceived benefits of bought medications based on previous experiences of treating similar children [4043].

In this study, self-medication was not significantly associated with delay in seeking healthcare. However, from the qualitative findings, self-medication was reported as a key barrier to prompt care-seeking. A study by Kallander and colleagues done in Uganda more than 10 years ago found that self-medication as measured by having used antibiotics at home was significantly associated with delay in care-seeking [11]. Similar findings have been reported in studies elsewhere in Africa and South Asia [19, 44, 45]. Self-medication with antibiotics may lead to development of antibiotic resistance [42, 46]. Additionally, self-medication generally may increase the likelihood of children showing no improvements on treatment due to possible unknown interactions between herbal medicines and clinic-prescribed medications.

We found that recognition of symptoms of severe illness, advice from relatives and friends, and early identification of danger signs as facilitators of early care seeking for children with severe pneumonia. According to Bantie and friends, in a cross-sectional study among 356 mothers living in northwest Ethiopia, individuals who were aware of the symptoms of pneumonia and the advantages of seeking care at the hospital early were more likely not to delay [19]. Similar findings were noted in other studies evaluating health seeking behavior determinants [47, 48]. Advice was mainly from fathers of children, friends, and relatives. Consulting fathers and other respected family members like grandparents or in-laws often leads to early care seeking although in some situations may lead to delayed decision making regarding when and where to seek care for some childhood conditions [16, 37, 49, 50].

Availability of skilled health workers was highlighted as a facilitator of prompt care seeking for children with pneumonia. The recommended management of children with pneumonia entails the correct establishment of the severity, appropriate antibiotic use, possible oxygen therapy if indicated, and the ability to change treatment criteria if needed [50, 51]. To achieve this, trained and skilled health workers are pivotal in all levels of care for children with pneumonia.

Relatedly, health worker attitudes may determine an individual’s choice to seek healthcare at a given hospital [32]. Rude health workers and poor implementation of triage criteria were barriers to prompt care-seeking in this study. In addition, low levels of health worker staffing and unavailability of medicines led to negative experiences by caregivers while they were at the health facility. Unavailability of medicines and inadequate staffing are common realities in many government health facilities in Uganda and other LMIC areas [16, 49, 50, 5254], which leads to loss of trust, avoidance of hospital when children are sick and subsequent delays in seeking care. Thus, efforts to improve child health should include improving availability of medicines and ensuring that health facilities have adequate, skilled, and friendly health workers.

Low level of education was noted as a barrier to prompt care-seeking by the study participants. They were either unable to make the decision about early seeking or communicate the child’s condition to the health worker. Wambui et al found that highly educated caregivers are more likely to seek immediate healthcare for children with pneumonia symptoms due to possibly their knowledge of symptoms [30]. Similarly, caregivers who had higher levels of education in the Peruvian amazon took their children with pneumonia symptoms to the hospital early [16]. Other studies have also documented related results [19, 55, 56].

Perception of illness entails beliefs about bodily states, psychological and affective reactions, and the strength of perceived representations that inform the behavior of a sick individual [57]. From studies done on delays in seeking care for other childhood illnesses like malaria, the perception of illness may negatively affect the choice of seeking care [37]. Our study findings revealed that individuals who felt that their child was severely ill sought care quickly compared to those who did not. This may be due to their previous experiences with other children or fear of deterioration of the child at night when they would have been unable to move to the health center. On the contrary, some caregivers reported an inability to identify pneumonia symptoms such as difficulty in breathing, chest in drawing, or abnormal breathing causing delays in seeking care. The caregivers recognized fever and reduced feeding as symptoms their children had which were misleading since other childhood illnesses may present with the same symptoms. These findings re-echo previous findings from studies done in Kenya and Peruvian Amazon where mothers reported that fever and refusal to feed may represent many other childhood illnesses. Thus, it may make it difficult to identify them as symptoms of pneumonia [16, 52].

Our study findings indicated that seeking care from the nearby drug shops or clinics and delays in referral to hospital were also barriers to prompt care seeking. These clinics were near the caregivers despite them having less skilled health workers. Studies done in Uganda have found that caregivers seek care at the clinics for many febrile childhood illnesses including pneumonia [58]. However, delayed referral due to inability to identify poor treatment response may lead to children’s deterioration and in the worst cases death [59]. In this study, first seeking care from drug shops or clinics may be explained by the tertiary care status of the study site and a high number of urban drug shops and clinics surrounding the hospital catchment area.

With the majority of mothers seeking care from alternative sources like drug shops, pharmacies, and herbalists before coming to hospital, most children with severe pneumonia continue to receive the much need treatment late.

Strengths and limitations

This study involved both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection which offered extensive opportunities for understanding delay in seeking healthcare for children with severe pneumonia. However, findings of this study should be interpreted in light of important limitations. First, it is possible that caregivers might have failed to recall the exact time when the child started experiencing pneumonia symptoms. To counter this, we used precise questions to estimate when symptoms started like asking if symptoms started at about lunch time, night before bed or more than a whole day and night. Secondly, social desirability bias where some caregivers could have said they did not delay for good social ratings thus a likelihood to underestimate the prevalence of delay. However, we ensured privacy during interviews and we were not judgmental which makes us believe the findings. Also, most caregivers in FGDs were free and open to discuss these kinds of things so we believe the impact of social desirability on study results could have been minimal. Lastly, in this study we were unable to explore all health system determinants of delay in receiving appropriate healthcare. In-depth interviews with hospital administrators and health workers would have elucidated perspectives on possible causes of delay in receiving healthcare while in hospital such as poor triage systems and unavailability of medicines.

Conclusion

More than half of the caregivers delayed seeking healthcare for their children with pneumonia symptoms. As such, many children remain at risk of suffering complications of severe pneumonia including death. Long distance to the hospital, delayed referral, family income, education level of caregiver, recognition of symptoms and their severity as well as family support influence prompt healthcare seeking. Research into effective interventions and health system strengthening to improve prompt healthcare seeking for children with severe pneumonia is highly needed in Uganda and other low-income settings that may have similar challenges

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the great contribution of the caregivers who participated in this study. We thank the research assistants who collected the data used in this publication.

Data Availability

This minimal dataset for replicating findings from this study can be found at https://github.com/Ekyaruhanga/Dataset_-Delay.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Unicef. One child dies of pneumonia every 39 seconds, agencies warn. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Watkins K, Wright S, Le Nestour A, Mathieson K, Alfaiate J, Leigh C, et al. Fighting for breath: a call to action on childhood pneumonia. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Christensen M, Detjen A, Hug L, McDonald K, Murphy P, Porth T, et al. Every child’s right to survive: An agenda to end pneumonia deaths. UNICEF, Save the Children, Every Breath Counts; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Unicef analysis based on WHO and Maternal and Child Epidemiology Estimation Group interim estimates produced in, applying cause fractions for the year 2017 to United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation estimates for the year 2018. 2019. September. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.unicef. Pneumonia in Children Statistics—UNICEF DATA. 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McAllister DA, Liu L, Shi T, Chu Y, Reed C, Burrows J, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of pneumonia morbidity and mortality in children younger than 5 years between 2000 and 2015: a systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(1):e47–e57. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30408-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Statistics UBo, MEASURE/DHS+ OM. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey, 2016: Uganda Bureau of Statistics; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Statistics UBo. Uganda Demographic and Health Survey. 2016. p. 625. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nantanda R, Hildenwall H, Peterson S, Kaddu-Mulindwa D, Kalyesubula I K. Tumwine J. Bacterial aetiology and outcome in children with severe pneumonia in Uganda. Annals of tropical paediatrics. 2008;28(4):253–60. doi: 10.1179/146532808X375404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Srinivasan MG, Ndeezi G, Mboijana CK, Kiguli S, Bimenya GS, Nankabirwa V, et al. Zinc adjunct therapy reduces case fatality in severe childhood pneumonia: a randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial. BMC medicine. 2012;10(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Källander K, Hildenwall H, Waiswa P, Galiwango E, Peterson S, Pariyo G. Delayed care seeking for fatal pneumonia in children aged under five years in Uganda: a case-series study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008;86:332–8. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.049353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.MOH. Annual Health Sector Performance Report 2018/2019. Kampala; 2019. 04 Mar, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.WHO u. Integrated Community Case Management of Childhood Malaria, Pneumonia and Diarrhoea. 2010. p. 57. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Druetz T, Siekmans K, Goossens S, Ridde V, Haddad S. The community case management of pneumonia in Africa: a review of the evidence. Health Policy and Planning. 2015;30(2):253–66. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Social science & medicine. 1994;38(8):1091–110. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90226-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pajuelo MJ, Huaynate CA, Correa M, Malpartida HM, Asayag CR, Seminario JR, et al. Delays in seeking and receiving health care services for pneumonia in children under five in the Peruvian Amazon: a mixed-methods study on caregivers’ perceptions. BMC health services research. 2018;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2950-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ndungu EW, Okwara FN, Oyore JP. Cross Sectional Survey of Care Seeking For Acute Respiratory Illness in Children Under 5 Years in Rural Kenya. Am J Pediatr. 2018;4(3):69–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ferdous F, Ahmed S, Das SK, Chisti MJ, Nasrin D, Kotloff KL, et al. Pneumonia mortality and healthcare utilization in young children in rural Bangladesh: a prospective verbal autopsy study. Tropical medicine and health. 2018;46(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41182-018-0099-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bantie GM, Meseret Z, Bedimo M, Bitew A. The prevalence and root causes of delay in seeking healthcare among mothers of under five children with pneumonia in hospitals of Bahir Dar city, North West Ethiopia. BMC pediatrics. 2019;19(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1869-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ibraheem RM, Abdulkadir MB, Gobir AA, Johnson WB. Socio-demographic and clinical factors predicting time to presentation for children with pneumonia in Ilorin, Nigeria. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2018;54(3):247–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kirolos A, Ayede AI, Williams LJ, Fowobaje KR, Nair H, Bakare AA, et al. Care seeking behaviour and aspects of quality of care by caregivers for children under five with and without pneumonia in Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of global health. 2018;8(2):020805. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.2019 Statistical abstract. Uganda Bureau of Statistics; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qualitative health research. 2017;27(4):591–608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Organization WH. Pocket book of hospital care for children: guidelines for the management of common childhood illnesses: World Health Organization; 2013. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mukandoli E. Health seeking behaviors of parents/caretakers of children with severe respiratory infections in a selected referral hospital in Rwanda: University of Rwanda; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gerald M. Assessing factors influencing health seeking behavior for malaria treatment in children under five years in Rwimi Town Council Kabarole District. Int J Sch Cogn Psychol. 2015;2:151. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ministry of Health U. Uganda Hospital and Health Centre IV Census Survey 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Owori M. Poverty in Uganda: National and regional data trends. development initiative; 2 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Umuhoza C, Karambizi A, Tuyisenge L, Cartledge P. Caregiver delay in seeking healthcare during the acute phase of pediatric illness, Kigali, Rwanda. Pan African Medical Journal. 2018;30. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.160.15286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wambui WM, Kimani S, Odhiambo E. Determinants of health seeking behavior among caregivers of infants admitted with acute childhood illnesses at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya. International journal of pediatrics. 2018;2018. doi: 10.1155/2018/5190287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Temsesgen D, Wordofa B, Tesfaye T, Etafa W. Delay in seeking healthcare for pneumonia and associated factors among mothers/caregivers of children aged 2–59 months in public health facilities in Nekemte town, Ethiopia. BMC pediatrics. 2023;23(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nicolette N-B, Peterson S. Barriers to timely health seeking behaviour for children among care givers in an urban slum in Uganda. International Journal of public health and Epidemiology), © International Scholars Journals. 2012;Vol. 1 (3):pp. 035–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Oldenburg CE, Sié A, Ouattara M, Bountogo M, Boudo V, Kouanda I, et al. Distance to primary care facilities and healthcare utilization for preschool children in rural northwestern Burkina Faso: results from a surveillance cohort. BMC health services research. 2021;21:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abdulkadir MB, Abdulkadir ZA, Johnson WBR. An analysis of national data on care-seeking behaviour by parents of children with suspected pneumonia in Nigeria. South African Journal of Child Health. 2016;10(1):92–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Musoke D, Boynton P, Butler C, Musoke MB. Health seeking behaviour and challenges in utilising health facilities in Wakiso district, Uganda. African health sciences. 2014;14(4):1046–55. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v14i4.36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Aftab W, Shipton L, Rabbani F, Sangrasi K, Perveen S, Zahidie A, et al. Exploring health care seeking knowledge, perceptions and practices for childhood diarrhea and pneumonia and their context in a rural Pakistani community. BMC health services research. 2018;18(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mpimbaza A, Nayiga S, Ndeezi G, Rosenthal PJ, Karamagi C, Katahoire A. Understanding the context of delays in seeking appropriate care for children with symptoms of severe malaria in Uganda. PloS one. 2019;14(6):e0217262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu J, Prach LM, Treleaven E, Hansen M, Anyanti J, Jagha T, et al. The role of drug vendors in improving basic health-care services in Nigeria. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2016;94(4):267. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.154666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mackintosh M, Channon A, Karan A, Selvaraj S, Cavagnero E, Zhao H. What is the private sector? Understanding private provision in the health systems of low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet. 2016;388(10044):596–605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00342-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rutebemberwa E, Pariyo G, Peterson S, Tomson G, Kallander K. Utilization of public or private health care providers by febrile children after user fee removal in Uganda. Malaria Journal. 2009;8(1):45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sudhinaraset M, Ingram M, Lofthouse HK, Montagu D. What is the role of informal healthcare providers in developing countries? A systematic review. PloS one. 2013;8(2):e54978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ngocho JS, Horumpende PG, de Jonge MI, Mmbaga BT. Inappropriate treatment of community-acquired pneumonia among children under five years of age in Tanzania. International journal of infectious diseases: IJID: official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2020;93:56–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Grigoryan L, Burgerhof JG, Degener JE, Deschepper R, Lundborg CS, Monnet DL, et al. Attitudes, beliefs and knowledge concerning antibiotic use and self-medication: a comparative European study. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2007;16(11):1234–43. doi: 10.1002/pds.1479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kamaruzaman NA, Muthupalaniappenm L, Pasi H. Health care seeking behaviour among caregivers of children with pneumonia in a rural area. International Medical Journal. 2013;20(4):413–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yamuna B, Ratnaprabha G, Kengnal P. Prevalence of acute morbidities and their health seeking behaviour among under-five children of urban slums in a city in Karnataka. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health. 2017;4(7):2449–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Horumpende PG, Said SH, Mazuguni FS, Antony ML, Kumburu HH, Sonda TB, et al. Prevalence, determinants and knowledge of antibacterial self-medication: A cross sectional study in North-eastern Tanzania. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Manzi A, Munyaneza F, Mujawase F, Banamwana L, Sayinzoga F, Thomson DR, et al. Assessing predictors of delayed antenatal care visits in Rwanda: a secondary analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2010. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;14(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Haile D. Factors affecting healthcare service utilization of mothers who had children with diarrhea in Ethiopia: evidence from a population based national survey. 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Colvin CJ, Smith HJ, Swartz A, Ahs JW, de Heer J, Opiyo N, et al. Understanding careseeking for child illness in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and conceptual framework based on qualitative research of household recognition and response to child diarrhoea, pneumonia and malaria. Social science & medicine. 2013;86:66–78. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bedford KJA, Sharkey AB . Local barriers and solutions to improve care-seeking for childhood pneumonia, diarrhoea and malaria in Kenya, Nigeria and Niger: a qualitative study. PloS one. 2014;9(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Subhi R, Adamson M, Campbell H, Weber M, Smith K, Duke T, et al. The prevalence of hypoxaemia among ill children in developing countries: a systematic review. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2009;9(4):219–27. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70071-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Opwora AS, Laving AM, Nyabola LO, Olenja JM. Who is to blame? Perspectives of caregivers on barriers to accessing healthcare for the under-fives in Butere District, Western Kenya. BMC public health. 2011;11(1):272. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Katahoire AR, Henriksson DK, Ssegujja E, Waiswa P, Ayebare F, Bagenda D, et al. Improving child survival through a district management strengthening and community empowerment intervention: early implementation experiences from Uganda. BMC public health. 2015;15(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2129-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lungu EA, Guda Obse A, Darker C, Biesma R. What influences where they seek care? Caregivers’ preferences for under-five child healthcare services in urban slums of Malawi: A discrete choice experiment. PloS one. 2018;13(1):e0189940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mosley WH, Chen LC. An analythical framework for the study of child survival in developing countries. Bulletin of the world Health Organization. 2003;81:140–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ramachandran P, Nedunchelian K, Vengatesan A, Suresh S. Risk factors for mortality in community-acquired pneumonia among children aged 1–59 months admitted in a referral hospital. Indian pediatrics. 2012;49(11):889–95. doi: 10.1007/s13312-012-0221-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Petersen S, van den Berg RA, Janssens T, Van den Bergh O. Illness and symptom perception: a theoretical approach towards an integrative measurement model. Clinical psychology review. 2011;31(3):428–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hildenwall H, Tomson G, Kaija J, Pariyo G, Peterson S. "I never had the money for blood testing"–Caretakers’ experiences of care-seeking for fatal childhood fevers in rural Uganda–a mixed methods study. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2008;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-8-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.World Health Organization. World Malaria Report Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Kshitij Karki

7 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-33296Delay in healthcare seeking for children with severe pneumonia at Mulago National Referral Hospital: a mixed methods cross-sectional studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Phiona Ekyaruhanga,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Please go thoroughly and address the comments of reviewers. The manuscript is important but need to solve the technical and scientific issues raised by reviewers. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 24 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Kshitij Karki, MPH, MA

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for your important research. Please go through the suggestions of the reviewers and revise the manuscript as suggested.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Revise the sampling procedure, it say convenient method for the quantitative. For the qualitative they used four FGDs why four? In the analysis part, it is better to run both Bivariable and multivariable.

Reviewer #2: In its current form, this manuscript is not publishable. More specific:

1. Introduction is not specific and very long

2. Methods are not described appropriately, including how sample size was calculated

3. Analysis was not performed appropriately. More appropriate to conduct multilevel modelling

4. Discussion section is not very well written

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 10;18(10):e0291387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291387.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


12 May 2023

May 10, 2023

Academic Editor,

PLOS ONE

Dear Editor,

Re: Response to reviewers’ comments on our manuscript titled: Delay in healthcare seeking for young children with severe pneumonia at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda: a mixed methods cross-sectional study. (Ref No: PONE-D-22-33296)

We are grateful for the comments and suggestions on our manuscript by the reviewers. We have addressed them and specified our response to each of the reviewers’ comments.

Reviewer #1:

Comment: Revise the sampling procedure, it say convenient method for the quantitative.

Response: We thank the reviewer for highlighting this correction. The sampling method has been revised to state that the consecutive method of sampling was used instead of convenience method (See page 4, line 129). The children were then enrolled consecutively until the desired sample size was realized. Studies on sampling methods have indicated that consecutive sampling is feasible and offers representative samples in clinical studies (1). So, the assumption was that the children that were sampled were representative of those that are seen at the emergency paediatric unit of Mulago hospital.

Comment: For the qualitative they used four FGDs why four?

Response: Four FGDs were carried out at the end of which saturation (2) was reached where no new insights were emerging. This clarification has been made (See page 4, lines 124 – 126).

Comment: In the analysis part, it is better to run both Bivariable and multivariable

Response: The analysis section has been elaborated extensively and tables updated to describe the multilevel modeling done detailing both bivariable and multivariable analysis. A logistic regression model was built by including all factors with p<0.2 at bivariable analysis for multivariable analysis. p≤0.05 at multivariable analysis was considered statistically significant. All statistical tests were 2-sided and considered statistically significant at α = 0.05. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p values are presented. Interaction was assessed using likelihood ratios comparing full and reduced models whereas confounding was assessed by comparing adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios and a predictor variable with a difference of ≥10% was considered as a confounder. Conclusions were drawn based on the adjusted OR with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Goodness of fit of the final model was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. (See page 7, lines 187 – 202, table 5 and table 6)

Reviewer #2: In its current form, this manuscript is not publishable. More specific:

Comment: 1. Introduction is not specific and very long

Response: We thank the reviewer for highlighting this concern. The introduction section has extensively been revised, shortened, and made more focused. It has been re-written to focus on the burden of pneumonia, delay in seeking care and associated factors. In the initial version of the manuscript, it was 2.5 pages and has now been reduced to 1.5 pages. (See pages i- ii, lines 55-93)

Comment: 2. Methods are not described appropriately, including how sample size was calculated

Response: Thank you for this comment. We have revised the methods section entirely and also made explicit how the sample size was calculated. The sample size to determine the prevalence of delay in seeking healthcare was estimated using the formula for single proportions. We assumed 95% level of confidence, 5% sampling error, proportion of caregivers that delayed seeking healthcare for their children of 47.7% (3). This gave an estimated sample size of 384. In addition, we estimated the sample size for determining factors associated with delay in seeking healthcare based on the formular for comparison of two proportions using use of self-medication as the exposure variable (4). We assumed 5% significance, 80% power of the study, proportion of caregivers who had used self-medication was 25.6% versus 74.4% that had not used self-medication. The proportion of caregivers that had used self-medication and had delayed seeking healthcare was estimated at 78.7% while those that did not use self-medication but delayed was 42.1%. Based on these parameters, the estimated sample size was 66. The higher sample size of 384 based on the modified Kish Leslie formula was considered appropriate for the study (See page 3 - 4, lines 111-127).

Comment: 3. Analysis was not performed appropriately. More appropriate to conduct multilevel modelling

Response: More details on analysis have been added in the revised manuscript. Specifically, details on how multilevel modeling was done have been made explicit and tables updated (tables 5 and 6).

Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the participant characteristics and results expressed as proportions, means and medians, as appropriate. Shapiro wilks test was used to determine skewness of the different variables and the continuous variables that were not normally distributed were expressed as medians. To determine the prevalence of delay in seeking healthcare, the number of caregivers who took their children to a health center or hospital beyond 24 hours of onset of symptoms, was divided by the total number of participants and the result was expressed as a proportion. To determine the factors associated with delay in seeking healthcare, multivariable analysis was undertaken. A logistic regression model was built by including all factors with p<0.2 at bivariate analysis for multivariable analysis. P≤0.05 at multivariable analysis was considered statistically significant. All statistical tests were 2-sided and considered statistically significant at α = 0.05. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p values are presented. Interaction was assessed using likelihood ratios comparing full and reduced models whereas confounding was assessed by comparing adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios and a predictor variable with a difference of ≥10% was considered as a confounder. Conclusions were drawn based on the adjusted OR with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Goodness of fit of the final model was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

The qualitative data was analysed using content thematic approach in line with the study objectives. Transcripts were read several times to identify themes and sub-themes. Coding was done manually by PE in consultation with JR. This was done by grouping data in line with the themes and sub-themes. Verbatim quotations reflecting participants’ views on barriers and facilitators for prompt care seeking for children with severe pneumonia were identified and have been used in the presentation of the study findings. (See pages 7- 8, lines 204 - 226)

Comment: 4. Discussion section is not very well written

Response: We thank the reviewer for this comment. We have revised and strengthened the discussion section highlighting the key results, what they mean and compared with other studies. (See pages 29 - 34)

1. Bjørn M, Brendstrup C, Karlsen S, Carlsen JE. Consecutive screening and enrollment in clinical trials: the way to representative patient samples? Journal of cardiac failure. 1998;4(3):225-30.

2. Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qualitative health research. 2017;27(4):591-608.

3. Källander K, Hildenwall H, Waiswa P, Galiwango E, Peterson S, Pariyo G. Delayed care seeking for fatal pneumonia in children aged under five years in Uganda: a case-series study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2008;86:332-8.

4. Bantie GM, Meseret Z, Bedimo M, Bitew A. The prevalence and root causes of delay in seeking healthcare among mothers of under five children with pneumonia in hospitals of Bahir Dar city, North West Ethiopia. BMC pediatrics. 2019;19(1):482.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Kshitij Karki

11 Jul 2023

PONE-D-22-33296R1Delay in healthcare seeking for young children with severe pneumonia at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda: a mixed methods cross-sectional study.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ekyaruhanga,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 25 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Kshitij Karki, MPH, MA

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments :

Please check the spelling and grammatical errors. Also, revise the tables with row percentage (For example: if you are comparing delay and not delay with other variables). Thank you

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 10;18(10):e0291387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291387.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


21 Aug 2023

August 8, 2023

Academic Editor,

PLOS ONE

Dear Editor,

Re: Response to the editors’ comments on our manuscript titled: Delay in healthcare seeking for young children with severe pneumonia at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda: a mixed methods cross-sectional Study. (Ref No: PONE-D-22-33296R1)

We appreciate the comments on our manuscript. We have addressed them and specified our response to each of the comments.

Comment: Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response: We thank the reviewer for highlighting this correction. We have reviewed the reference list and corrected any misspelled words. We are sure the list is complete and correct. No cited papers have been retracted.

Comment: Please check the spelling and grammatical errors.

Response: We have read the whole manuscript and corrected all the spelling and grammatical errors as marked up in the track changes.

Comment: Also, revise the tables with row percentage (For example: if you are comparing delay and not delay with other variables). Thank you.

Response: The tables with row percentages have been revised to have percentages of caregivers with a variable who delayed versus those with the same variable who did not delay. (See page 15 and 17, table 5 and table 6)

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Kshitij Karki

29 Aug 2023

Delay in healthcare seeking for young children with severe pneumonia at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda: a mixed methods cross-sectional study.

PONE-D-22-33296R2

Dear Dr. Phiona Ekyaruhanga,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Kshitij Karki, MPH, MA

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Please use consistent font in text and table as per guideline. Also, check and review the interpretation in results based on the revised tables.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Kshitij Karki

2 Oct 2023

PONE-D-22-33296R2

Delay in healthcare seeking for young children with severe pneumonia at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda: a mixed methods cross-sectional study.

Dear Dr. Ekyaruhanga:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Kshitij Karki

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    This minimal dataset for replicating findings from this study can be found at https://github.com/Ekyaruhanga/Dataset_-Delay.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES