Abstract
Successful endodontic treatments are contingent upon establishing a hermetic seal within the root canal system. This seal is pivotal in preventing/resolving apical periodontitis. This case report introduces a simplified orthograde apical plug and intra-orifice barrier technique as an effective alternative to previously unsuccessful invasive nonsurgical and surgical treatments. A 28-year-old patient presented with persistent discomfort and localized swelling in the furcation area of the mandibular left first molar. The tooth had previously undergone both root canal therapy and surgical retreatment. A distinctive feature of this case was the unconventional amputation of the mesial root, unlike conventional periradicular surgery or root amputation. This unusual scenario was accompanied by the presence of a large endodontic lesion. An apical plug, utilizing calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement, was placed, complemented by the use of CEM intra-orifice barriers to ensure the hermetic sealing of the entire root canal system. Long-term follow-up assessment demonstrated the complete healing of the preexisting large endodontic lesion. This case underscores the significance of proper diagnosis, right treatment planning, and considering conservative treatment options for complex cases, highlighting the pivotal role played by a reliable seal in achieving successful results in endodontic procedures.
Key Words: Apical plug, Calcium-enriched Mixture Cement, Endodontics, Intra-orifice barriers, Minimally invasive dentistry, Orthograde retreatment
Introduction
The paramount goal of successful endodontic treatments is the complete eradication of etiological factors within the root canal system while ensuring a hermetic seal. This objective is pivotal in averting the development of apical periodontitis or, if already present, facilitating its resolution [1].
Primary root canal treatment (RCT) is a fundamental procedure aimed at the complete eradication of etiological factors within the root canal system while ensuring a secure seal. This initial intervention is crucial in preventing the development or progression of apical periodontitis [2]. The success of primary RCT relies on the meticulous cleaning/shaping of the infected root canal system, followed by root canal filling, to create a hermetic seal [3]. However, the complexity of root canal anatomy and the challenges posed by various clinical scenarios can sometimes lead to unsuccessful primary RCTs, necessitating further endodontic interventions such as surgical endodontic retreatment. Surgical retreatment becomes instrumental when primary RCT is compromised by factors like complex anatomy, persistent infection, or the presence of obstructions within the root canals [4, 5]. While surgical retreatment is considered a more invasive approach, its importance lies in its ability to salvage teeth that might otherwise be deemed non-restorable.
An apical plug represents a precise method for establishing a hermetic seal in the apical portion of teeth with open apices by utilizing specialized endodontic filling biomaterials [6, 7]. Apical plugs prove particularly valuable in situations where conventional filling of the entire root canal system is hindered by anatomical complexities, procedural errors, or persistent infections [8].
Intra-orifice barriers have proven to be valuable adjuncts in endodontic treatments, facilitating the creation of a secure coronal seal for each root canal [9]. These barriers play a pivotal role in enhancing the coronal sealing of root canals, effectively preventing the reentry of microorganisms and promoting periradicular healing.
Dental clinicians are tasked with the responsibility of selecting an effective/straightforward approach for the cleaning, shaping, filling, and sealing of the root canal(s). In this case report, we implemented a simplified orthograde method involving the placement of an apical plug complemented by intra-orifice barriers. This approach was employed to address issues arising from a previously flawed primary RCT, which had been further complicated by an erroneous surgical intervention that perpetuated an endodontic lesion.
Case Report
A 28-year-old patient presented with persistent discomfort and localized swelling in the furcation area of the mandibular left first molar. This tooth had previously undergone both RCT and surgical retreatment. The patient experienced this discomfort for a year before seeking our consultation. His medical history was noncontributory. Clinical examination revealed the presence of a reasonably intact porcelain-fused-to-metal crown, a deep pocket in the furcation area of the involved tooth, accompanied by overlying soft tissue redness and tenderness. The initial periapical radiograph revealed a poor root canal obturation in mesial canals (but reasonable in the distal root canal), without a proper coronal seal in both roots (Figure 1A). Notably, there was an unusual amputation of the mesial root, distinct from conventional periradicular surgery or root amputation. Surrounding this site, a substantial endodontic lesion had developed, and signs of bone healing were evident at the extracted mesial root end.
We discussed various treatment options with the patient, including orthograde/nonsurgical endodontic retreatment of mesial canals. After obtaining written informed consent, the retreatment commenced with the removal of the crown. Subsequently, the access cavity was meticulously cleaned, and the root canal obturation from the mesial canals was completely removed, along with the removal of approximately one-third of the coronal portion of the distal root obturation.
The unique aspect of this case was the subsequent placement of an apical plug using calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement (BioniqueDent, Tehran, Iran). The CEM apical plug was carefully positioned within the entire part of the mesial root canals and simultaneously in the distal root as the best choice for intra-orifice barriers [10]. Then the access cavity was filled and sealed using a sandwich technique [11] using glass ionomer cement and resin composite (Figure 1B), and the crown was cemented again carefully (Figure 1C). These procedures effectively sealed the root canal system, and thus expected to prevent the reentrance of oral microorganisms as well as to promote periradicular healing.
A week later, the patient's signs and symptoms had completely resolved. However, the patient did not return for regular follow-up until nine years later. At this extended follow-up, clinical examination showed that the tooth was asymptomatic/functional, and radiographic assessments revealed the remarkable outcome of complete healing of the previously existing endodontic lesion (Figure 1D).
Discussion
Effective endodontic treatment hinges on achieving an impermeable seal within the root canal system. This case highlights the success of a simplified orthograde apical plug and intra-orifice barrier techniques in addressing a complex endodontic challenge, offering an alternative to more invasive surgical re-retreatment procedures. By adopting a minimally invasive approach, patient discomfort was dissolved, tooth preservation was achieved, and the endodontic lesion healed completely. This underscores the importance of simple and conservative options for complex cases and emphasizes the central role of a reliable seal in endodontic procedures.
The use of an apical plug, incorporating calcium silicate-based cements like CEM, signifies a notable advancement in endodontic techniques [12]. These biomaterials has gained recognition for its excellent sealing properties, biocompatibility, and regenerative potential [13-17]. In this case, CEM cement was employed to create a reliable apical plug within the root canal system. This innovative approach not only ensures the hermetic sealing of the apical portion but also harnesses the therapeutic benefits of CEM cement, potentially aiding in periradicular healing. The use of CEM cement as an apical plug offers a minimally invasive alternative to more complex surgical interventions, emphasizing the importance of conservative yet effective techniques in modern endodontics.
In this case study, intra-orifice barriers were strategically employed to complement the apical plug using CEM cement [18]. This approach ensured the comprehensive sealing of the root canal system, further fortifying the treatment's success. The integration of intra-orifice barriers underscores the evolving landscape of endodontics, where innovative techniques are tailored to address complex scenarios while preserving tooth structure/function.
Conclusion
This case serves as a reminder to dental clinicians that with careful assessment, proper diagnosis and thoughtful treatment planning, conservative measures can yield favorable results, contributing to the overall success and longevity of endodontically treated teeth.
Conflict of Interest:
‘None declared’.
References
- 1.Regan JD, Fleury AA. Irrigants in non-surgical endodontic treatment. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2006;52(2):84–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gomes B, Herrera DR. Etiologic role of root canal infection in apical periodontitis and its relationship with clinical symptomatology. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(suppl 1):e69. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nabavi S, Navabi S, Mohammadi SM. Management of Pulp Canal Obliteration in Mandibular Incisors with Guided Endodontic Treatment: A Case Report. Iran Endod J. 2022;17(4):216–9. doi: 10.22037/iej.v17i4.38381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kheirieh S, Fazlyab M, Torabzadeh H, Eghbal MJ. Extraoral Retrograde Root Canal Filling of an Orthodontic-induced External Root Resorption Using CEM Cement. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(2):149–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heydari A, Rahmani M, Heydari M. Removal of a Broken Instrument from a Tooth with Apical Periodontitis Using a Novel Approach. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(3):237–40. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ghaziani P, Fallah Rastegar A, Bidar M, Sadeghi G, Chegin P. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Success Rate with MTA Plug in Open Apices. Iran Endod J. 2006;1(1):15–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ayatollahi F, Tabrizizadeh M, Hazeri Baqdad Abad M, Ayatollahi R, Zarebidoki F. Comparison of microleakage of MTA and CEM cement apical plugs in three different media. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(3):198–201. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Roghanizadeh L, Fazlyab M. Revascularization and Apical Plug in an Immature Molar. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(1):139–42. doi: 10.22037/iej.v13i1.19666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yavari H, Samiei M, Eskandarinezhad M, Shahi S, Aghazadeh M, Pasvey Y. An in vitro comparison of coronal microleakage of three orifice barriers filling materials. Iran Endod J. 2012;7(3):156–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ramezanali F, Aryanezhad S, Mohammadian F, Dibaji F, Kharazifard MJ. In vitro microleakage of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium-enriched mixture cement and biodentine intra-orifice barriers. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(2):211–5. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Suzuki M, Jordan RE. Glass ionomer-composite sandwich technique. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;120(1):55–7. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nosrat A, Asgary S, Eghbal MJ, Ghoddusi J, Bayat-Movahed S. Calcium-enriched mixture cement as artificial apical barrier: A case series. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14(4):427–31. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.87218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Parirokh M, Farzaneh S, Hallajmofrad AR. Conservative management of unset mineral trioxide aggregate root-end filling: a case report. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(3):241–5. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Naghavi N, Ghoddusi J, Sadeghnia HR, Asadpour E, Asgary S. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium enriched mixture cements on L929 mouse fibroblast cells. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(1):64–9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2013-123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Asgary S, Alim Marvasti L, Kolahdouzan A. Indications and case series of intentional replantation of teeth. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(1):71–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Asgary S, Parirokh M, Eghbal MJ, Ghoddusi J, Eskandarizadeh A. SEM evaluation of neodentinal bridging after direct pulp protection with mineral trioxide aggregate. Aust Endod J. 2006;32(1):26–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2006.00004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Azimi S, Fazlyab M, Sadri D, Saghiri MA, Khosravanifard B, Asgary S. Comparison of pulp response to mineral trioxide aggregate and a bioceramic paste in partial pulpotomy of sound human premolars: a randomized controlled trial. Int Endod J. 2014;47(9):873–81. doi: 10.1111/iej.12231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yavari HR, Samiei M, Shahi S, Aghazadeh M, Jafari F, Abdolrahimi M, Asgary S. Microleakage comparison of four dental materials as intra-orifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth. Iran Endod J. 2012;7(1):25–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]