Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1987 Jul;84(3):814–819. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.3.814

Gas Exchange Characteristics of the Sorghum-Striga Host-Parasite Association

Malcolm C Press 1, Janet M Tuohy 1, George R Stewart 1
PMCID: PMC1056675  PMID: 16665527

Abstract

Gas exchange characteristics are reported for both members of the sorghum-Striga host-parasite association. Both Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth and Striga asiatica (L.) Kuntze had transpiration rates considerably in excess of those of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench, cv CSH1). Stomatal conductance in both Striga spp. showed little response to periods of darkness and moderate water stress. Low rates of net CO2 fixation and high rates of dark respiration led to no net daily (24 hours) C gain, and Striga would appear to be reliant on its host for photosynthate. Infection of sorghum plants with either S. hermonthica or S. asiatica reduced host photosynthetic capacity. Infected sorghum plants were also more prone to water stress, but reduced rates of CO2 fixation could not be accounted for in terms of lower stomatal conductance. Lower stomatal conductances were associated with an increase in water use efficiency (WUE) in uninfected sorghum; however, Striga-infected sorghum plants had lower WUE than those of uninfected plants. We suggest that Striga exerts a specific effect on processes affecting C acquisition in sorghum leaves. The water relations of S. hermonthica and S. asiatica are not characteristic of plants growing in semiarid environments and are more likely to reflect the nature of the parasitic life-style. Despite transfer of water and solutes from host to parasite, the reduction in C fixation observed in infected sorghum plants appears to be the major determinant of growth reductions observed in sorghum supporting Striga.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ehleringer J. R., Schulze E. D., Ziegler H., Lange O. L., Farquhar G. D., Cowar I. R. Xylem-tapping mistletoes: water or nutrient parasites? Science. 1985 Mar 22;227(4693):1479–1481. doi: 10.1126/science.227.4693.1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hull R. J., Leonard O. A. Physiological Aspects of Parasitism in Mistletoes (Arceuthobium and Phoradendron). I. The Carbohydrate Nutrition of Mistletoe. Plant Physiol. 1964 Nov;39(6):996–1007. doi: 10.1104/pp.39.6.996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hull R. J., Leonard O. A. Physiological Aspects of Parasitism in Mistletoes (Arceuthobium and Phoradendron). II. The Photosynthetic Capacity of Mistletoe. Plant Physiol. 1964 Nov;39(6):1008–1017. doi: 10.1104/pp.39.6.1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Richardson S. G., McCree K. J. Carbon balance and water relations of sorghum exposed to salt and water stress. Plant Physiol. 1985 Dec;79(4):1015–1020. doi: 10.1104/pp.79.4.1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES