Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1987 Aug;84(4):1132–1138. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.4.1132

Gibberellins, Endogenous and Applied, in Relation to Flower Induction in the Long-Day Plant Lolium temulentum1

Richard P Pharis 1,2,3, Lloyd T Evans 1,2,3, Rod W King 1,2,3, Lewis N Mander 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1056740  PMID: 16665573

Abstract

Changes in endogenous gibberellin-like substances (GAs) and related compounds in the shoot apices of Lolium temulentum during and after flower induction by one long day was examined for plants grown in three consecutive years. The total GA level in the shoot apical tissue was high (up to 42 micrograms per gram dry weight, or 3 × 10−5 molar GA3 equivalents), increasing several-fold on the day after the long day and then declining. Of the many GA-like substances present, the putative polyhydroxylated components—with HPLC retention times between those of GA8 (three hydroxyls) and GA32 (four hydroxyls), and accounting for about a quarter of the total GA activity—were most consistent and striking in their changes. Their level in the apices increased 3- to 5-fold on the day after the long day and then subsided. When various GAs were applied to plants in noninductive short days, flower initiation was induced by several, most notably by GA32, GA5, 2,2-dimethyl GA4, GA3, and GA7. GA32 was most like one long day in eliciting a strong flowering response while having little effect on stem growth, whereas GA1 had the opposite effect. It is suggested that highly hydroxylated C-19 GAs may play a central role in the induction of flowering in this long-day plant.

Full text

PDF
1132

Images in this article

1133Fig. 1
on p.1133

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. King R. W., Pharis R. P., Mander L. N. Gibberellins in Relation to Growth and Flowering in Pharbitis nil Chois. Plant Physiol. 1987 Aug;84(4):1126–1131. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.4.1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Koshioka M., Takeno K., Beall F. D., Pharis R. P. Purification and separation of plant gibberellins from their precursors and glucosyl conjugates. Plant Physiol. 1983 Oct;73(2):398–406. doi: 10.1104/pp.73.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Metzger J. D., Zeevaart J. A. Effect of Photoperiod on the Levels of Endogenous Gibberellins in Spinach as Measured by Combined Gas Chromatography-selected Ion Current Monitoring. Plant Physiol. 1980 Nov;66(5):844–846. doi: 10.1104/pp.66.5.844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rijven A. H., Evans L. T. Inflorescence initiation in Lolium temulentum L. IX. Some chemical changes in the shoot apex at induction. Aust J Biol Sci. 1967 Feb;20(1):1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rood S. B., Blake T. J., Pharis R. P. Gibberellins and Heterosis in Maize : II. Response to Gibberellic Acid and Metabolism of [H]Gibberellin A(20). Plant Physiol. 1983 Mar;71(3):645–651. doi: 10.1104/pp.71.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zeevaart J. A. Effects of photoperiod on growth rate and endogenous gibberellins in the long-day rosette plant spinach. Plant Physiol. 1971 Jun;47(6):821–827. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.6.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES