Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1987 Aug;84(4):1210–1213. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.4.1210

Alcohol Dehydrogenase and Pyruvate Decarboxylase Activity in Leaves and Roots of Eastern Cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) and Soybean (Glycine max L.) 1

Thomas W Kimmerer 1
PMCID: PMC1056753  PMID: 16665586

Abstract

Pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC, EC 4.1.1.1) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH, EC 1.1.1.1) are responsible for the anaerobic production of acetaldehyde and ethanol in higher plants. In developing soybean embryos, ADH activity increased upon imbibition and then declined exponentially with development, and was undetectable in leaves by 30 days after imbibition. PDC was not detectable in soybean leaves. In contrast, ADH activity remained high in developing cottonwood seedlings, with no decline in activity during development. ADH activity in the first fully expanded leaf of cottonwood was 230 micromoles NADH oxidized per minute per gram dry weight, and increased with leaf age. Maximal PDC activity of cottonwood leaves was 10 micromoles NADH oxidized per minute per gram dry weight. ADH activity in cottonwood roots was induced by anaerobic stress, increasing from 58 to 205 micromoles NADH oxidized per minute per gram dry weight in intact plants in 48 hours, and from 38 to 246 micromoles NADH oxidized per minute per gram dry weight in detached roots in 48 hours. Leaf ADH activity increased by 10 to 20% on exposure to anaerobic conditions. Crude leaf enzyme extracts with high ADH activity reduced little or no NADH when other aldehydes, such as trans-2-hexenal, were provided as substrate. ADH and PDC are constitutive enzyme in cottonwood leaves, but their metabolic role is not known.

Full text

PDF
1210

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradford M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HAGEMAN R. H., FLESHER D. The effect of an anaerobic environment on the activity of alcohol dehydrogenase and other enzymes of corn seedings. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1960 Apr;87:203–209. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(60)90161-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hake S., Kelley P. M., Taylor W. C., Freeling M. Coordinate induction of alcohol dehydrogenase 1, aldolase, and other anaerobic RNAs in maize. J Biol Chem. 1985 Apr 25;260(8):5050–5054. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ho D. T., Scandalios J. G. Regulation of Alcohol Dehydrogenases in Maize Scutellum during Germination. Plant Physiol. 1975 Jul;56(1):56–59. doi: 10.1104/pp.56.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kimmerer T. W., Kozlowski T. T. Ethylene, Ethane, Acetaldehyde, and Ethanol Production By Plants under Stress. Plant Physiol. 1982 Apr;69(4):840–847. doi: 10.1104/pp.69.4.840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kimmerer T. W., Macdonald R. C. Acetaldehyde and ethanol biosynthesis in leaves of plants. Plant Physiol. 1987 Aug;84(4):1204–1209. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.4.1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Langston-Unkefer P. J., Lee T. C. Pyruvate Decarboxylase from Zea mays L. : 2. Examination of Hysteretic Kinetics. Plant Physiol. 1985 Oct;79(2):436–440. doi: 10.1104/pp.79.2.436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sachs M. M., Freeling M., Okimoto R. The anaerobic proteins of maize. Cell. 1980 Jul;20(3):761–767. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90322-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES