Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Quality in Health Care : QHC logoLink to Quality in Health Care : QHC
. 1992 Mar;1(1):26–28. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.1.26

Management of coeliac disease: a changing diagnostic approach but what value in follow up?

M Acalovschi 1, V Jayanthi 1, C S Probert 1, J F Mayberry 1
PMCID: PMC1056802  PMID: 10136825

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the management of patients with coeliac disease in relation to a change in diagnostic method from jejunal suction biopsy to endoscopic biopsy. DESIGN--16 item questionnaire survey of consultant members of the British Society of Gastroenterology. SUBJECTS--359 consultant physician and gastroenterologist members of the society. MAIN MEASURES--Type of routine biopsy; repeat biopsy after gluten withdrawal; gluten rechallenge; follow up measurements; screening for malignancy; and methods of follow up, including special clinics. RESULTS--270(70%) members replied; 216(80%) diagnosed coeliac disease routinely by endoscopic duodenal biopsy, 30(11%) by jejunal capsule biopsy, and the remainder by either method. Only 156(58%) repeated the biopsy after gluten withdrawal, though more did so for duodenal than jejunal biopsies (134/216, 62% v 13/30, 43%; p < 0.02). Follow up biopsies featured more duodenal than jejunal biopsies (133/156, 82% v 23/156, 15%; p < 0.02). Regular follow up included assessments of weight (259, 96%) and full blood count (238, 88%) but limited assessment of serum B-12 and folate (120, 44%) and calcium (105, 39%) concentrations. Routine screening for malignancy is not performed, and there are few specialist clinics. 171(63%) respondents thought that patients should be followed up by a hospital specialist and 58(21%) by family doctors. CONCLUSIONS--The practice of diagnosing coeliac disease varies appreciably from that in many standard texts. Many patients could be effectively cared for by their family doctor. IMPLICATIONS--The British Society of Gastroenterology should support such management by family doctors by providing clear guidelines for them.

Full text

PDF
26

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barson A. J., Donnai P., Ferguson A., Donnai D., Read A. P. Haemangioma of the cord: further cause of raised maternal serum and liquor alpha-fetoprotein. Br Med J. 1980 Nov 8;281(6250):1252–1252. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6250.1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brocchi E., Corazza G. R., Caletti G., Treggiari E. A., Barbara L., Gasbarrini G. Endoscopic demonstration of loss of duodenal folds in the diagnosis of celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 1988 Sep 22;319(12):741–744. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198809223191202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collin P., Hällström O., Mäki M., Viander M., Keyriläinen O. Atypical coeliac disease found with serologic screening. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990 Mar;25(3):245–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Freeman H. J., Chiu B. K. Small bowel malignant lymphoma complicating celiac sprue and the mesenteric lymph node cavitation syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1986 Jun;90(6):2008–2012. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90275-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gillberg R., Ahrén C. Coeliac disease diagnosed by means of duodenoscopy and endoscopic duodenal biopsy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1977;12(8):911–916. doi: 10.3109/00365527709181349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holmes G. K., Prior P., Lane M. R., Pope D., Allan R. N. Malignancy in coeliac disease--effect of a gluten free diet. Gut. 1989 Mar;30(3):333–338. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.3.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kumar P. J., O'Donoghue D. P., Stenson K., Dawson A. M. Reintroduction of gluten in adults and children with treated coeliac disease. Gut. 1979 Sep;20(9):743–749. doi: 10.1136/gut.20.9.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Loft D. E., Marsh M. N., Crowe P. T. Rectal gluten challenge and diagnosis of coeliac disease. Lancet. 1990 Jun 2;335(8701):1293–1295. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91183-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Logan R. F., Rifkind E. A., Busuttil A., Gilmour H. M., Ferguson A. Prevalence and "incidence" of celiac disease in Edinburgh and the Lothian region of Scotland. Gastroenterology. 1986 Feb;90(2):334–342. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90929-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Logan R. F., Tucker G., Rifkind E. A., Heading R. C., Ferguson A. Changes in clinical features of coeliac disease in adults in Edinburgh and the Lothians 1960-79. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Jan 8;286(6359):95–97. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6359.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mee A. S., Burke M., Vallon A. G., Newman J., Cotton P. B. Small bowel biopsy for malabsorption: comparison of the diagnostic adequacy of endoscopic forceps and capsule biopsy specimens. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Sep 21;291(6498):769–772. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6498.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Puska P., Iacono J. M., Nissinen A., Korhonen H. J., Vartianinen E., Pietinen P., Dougherty R., Leino U., Mutanen M., Moisio S. Controlled, randomised trial of the effect of dietary fat on blood pressure. Lancet. 1983 Jan 1;1(8314-5):1–5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91556-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES