Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Oct 12;18(10):e0292653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292653

Clinical indicators combined with S100A12/TLR2 signaling molecules to establish a new scoring model for coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease

Yali Wu 1,, Shasha Wang 1,, Yang Zhou 1, Youjun Yang 1, Shiyu Li 1, Wei Yin 1, Yan Ding 1,*
Editor: Benjamin M Liu2
PMCID: PMC10569519  PMID: 37824465

Abstract

Coronary artery lesions (CALs) are the most common and serious complication of Kawasaki disease (KD), and the pathogenesis is unknown. Exploring KD-specific biomarkers and related risk factors is significant for clinical diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of combining clinical indicators with S100A12/TLR2-associated signaling molecules for the predictive modeling of CALs in KD. A total of 346 patients (224 males and 122 females) with KD who visited the rheumatology department of Wuhan Children’s Hospital between April 2022 and March 2025 were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of CALS (292 patients had CALs and 54 patients did not). Forty-one variables were collected from the two groups, including demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, and laboratory data. Single nucleated cells from each patient were extracted, and the expression of the S100A12/TLR2 signal transduction-related molecules S100A12, TLR2, MYD88, and NF-κB were detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Statistically significant variables were subjected to logistic regression analysis to determine the independent risk factors for KD with CALs, and a new risk score model was established to assess the predictive efficacy based on receiver operating characteristic curves. Sixteen variables significantly differed between the no-CALs and CALs groups: gender, fever duration, white blood cells (WBC), hemoglobin (HGB), Ce reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, serum ferritin (SF), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fibrinogen (FIB), aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio (AST/ALT), serum albumin (ALB), sodium (Na), Interleukin (IL-10), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), S100 calcium binding protein A12 (S100A12), and Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88 (MYD88) (p < 0.05). After performing a univariate analysis, 12 variables (gender, fever duration, WBC, HGB, CRP, SF, ESR, FIB, AST/ALT, ALB, Na, and S100A12) were included in the multifactorial binary logistic regression, which showed that fever duration ≥ 6.5 days, ESR ≥ 46.5 mm/h, AST/ALT ≤ 1.51, and S100A12 ≥ 10.02 were independent risk factors for KD with CALs and were assigned scores of 3, 2, 1, and 2, respectively, according to the odds ratio (OR). The total score of each patient was counted, and a new prediction model for KD combined with CALs was established, where < 3.5 was considered low risk and ≥ 3.5 was regarded as high risk; the sensitivity, specificity, Jorden index, and area under the curve of this scoring system were 0.667, 0.836, 0.502, and 0.838, respectively. This new scoring model has good efficacy for predicting the occurrence of KD with CALs. The expression of S100A12 was significantly increased in the CALs group and was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of CALs, and has the potential as a biomarker for predicting KD with CALs.

Introduction

Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute febrile disease of unknown etiology, characterized by systemic inflammation and vasculitis [1]. In contrast to Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) related to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), KD mostly occurs in children over five years of age. The most common complication of KD is coronary artery disease, especially coronary artery lesions (CALs) such as coronary artery dilation, aneurysm, coronary artery thrombosis and stenosis, life-threatening coronary aneurysm rupture, myocardial infarction, and heart failure in severe cases [2, 3]. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and aspirin in KD has significantly decreased the incidence of CALs, but CALs are still observed in 5–20% of patients in the acute phase [46]. Nevertheless, the pathogenesis of CALS due to KD is currently unclear, and no validated biomarkers are available to predict the occurrence of this complication. Therefore, it is challenging for clinicians to predict the occurrence of CALs and implement effective intervention measures. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy of clinical indicators combined with S100A12/TLR2-related signaling molecules in predicting KD with CALs and provide a basis for understanding the pathogenesis of CALs, and assist clinical decision-making.

A member of the calcium-binding S100 family, S100A12 activates inflammatory responses by binding to multiple receptors extracellularly in damage-related molecular patterns [7]. Previous studies have found that neutrophils in the early stage of KD can secrete S100A12 [8] to promote KD coronary artery lesions through the synergistic activation of endothelial cells [9, 10], whereas S100A12 strictly depends on pattern recognition receptors, such as toll like receptors (TLRs), to function in vivo [11, 12]. The S100A12 and TLR signaling molecules have not yet been reported as indicators of KD. TLRs are important in innate immunity, immunodeficiency, and COVID-19 [13, 14]. The application of TLRs, cytokines, and other biomarkers in severe COVID and MIS-C (similar to KD) may provide a good example to illustrate the progress of novel biomarker application in rare or severe infections [15]. TLR2 has been reported to predict CAL progression in patients with KD [16, 17], and a study by Soo et al. found that the high expression of TLR2 in single-nucleated cells was correlated with CALs and non-response in KD [16]. Highly expressed TLR can activate the signaling mediators domain-containing adapter-induced interferon-β (TRIF) and Myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88), allowing nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kB) activation to promote TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, and other pro-inflammatory factors [18]. Previous studies have confirmed that TLR2 and MyD88 contribute to Lactobacillus casei extract-induced focal coronary arteritis in a mouse model of KD [19], and Seyed et al. found that TLR2, TLR3, TLR9, MYD88, and TRIF gene transcript levels were upregulated in KD patients before IVIG treatment and downregulated after treatment [20]. In addition, several studies have found that NF-κB is involved in the development and progression of KD by participating in the inflammatory response, regulating the release of inflammatory factors [21], participating in immune activation [22], and inducing vascular endothelial damage [23]. Therefore, we envision that S100A12/TLR2 may activate the immune response of KD and may be involved in the development of CALs in KD by inducing the high expression of NF-κB by MYD88.

Materials and methods

Study population

Cohort study. Children with KD admitted to the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Wuhan Children’s Hospital in Hubei province, China, from April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023, were used as the cohort population. They were effectively treated and followed up for eight weeks after discharge and were divided into no-CALs and CALs groups according to the occurrence of CALs, all with a complete medical history and laboratory and cardiac ultrasound data.

KD inclusion criteria: 1. meeting the KD diagnostic criteria published by the American Heart Association in 2017 [24]; 2. case information; 3. age < 18 years; 4. patients with a first diagnosis of KD and not receiving IVIG treatment.

The KD exclusion criteria were as follows: 1. incomplete treatment data; 2. underlying coronary artery disease; 3. previous use of hormonal drugs within four weeks; 4. secondary infection; 5. lost to follow-up; 6. immunodeficiency.

CALs were defined according to the Japanese Ministry of Health criteria [25, 26] using echocardiography performed for each KD patient: an internal lumen diameter greater than 3.0 mm in children < 5 years of age or greater than 4.0 mm in children ≥ 5 years of age or an internal diameter at least 1.5 times larger than the diameter of the adjacent segment, if the morphology of the coronary lumen was obviously irregular, or if the z-score ≥ 2.5.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Wuhan Children’s Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (NO. 2022R053-E01), and all guardians of the children signed an informed consent form.

Patients with KD admitted to the hospital from April 1, 2022, to March 31, 2023, were recruited into the study cohort according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and after obtaining informed consent. Cardiac ultrasonography was performed to assess their coronary arteries from weeks 0, 1, 4, and 8 after the diagnosis of KD, and patients with CALs were found to require more frequent monitoring than the four times mentioned above. Missed visits were excluded, and 292 and 54 patients in the non-CAL groups and CAL, respectively, were included (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Flow chart of study subject inclusion.

Fig 1

KD, Kawasaki disease; CALs, Coronary artery lesions.

Data collection

The data platform and medical record system of Wuhan Children’s Hospital acquired the information of 346 patients and collected baseline information (gender, age, and body mass index [BMI]), clinical manifestations (fever duration, rash, conjunctivitis, lip and tongue changes, lymphadenopathy, and extremity changes), laboratory results (white blood cells [WBC], hemoglobin [Hb], platelets [PLT], neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR = neutrophils (×109/L)/lymphocytes (×109/L)], C reactive protein [CRP], procalcitonin [PCT], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], serum ferritin [SF], fibrinogen [Fib], pusuria, aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio [AST/ALT], lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], creatine kinase-MB [CK-MB], serum albumin [ALB], total bilirubin [TBIL], direct bilirubin [DBIL], serum creatinine [Scr], urea nitrogen [BUN], serum Na, CD3+CD4+T, CD3+CD8+T, CD19+B, CD4/CD8+T, IgM, IgG, IgA, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IFNγ, and TNFα), cardiac ultrasound (coronary artery diameter and Z-value), which were entered into EXCEL tables.

To obtain peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), peripheral venous blood was taken from all KD patients in the cohort, anticoagulated using heparin, and added to the stratification solution. PBMCs were extracted after centrifugation and washed twice with sterile phosphate-buffered saline, and the cells were resuspended in RPMI-1640 culture medium and stored at 4°C.

RNA was extracted from the PBMC samples using TRIzol reagent and stored at -70°C, and the RNA concentration and purity were measured with the NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Massachusetts, USA) spectrophotometer. RNAs were converted into cDNA by reverse transcription using the PrimeScript TM RT Reagent kit (Vazyme Biotech [Nanjing] Co., Ltd. CHINA). Following cDNA synthesis, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and relative quantification were performed using Premix Ex Taq SYBR (Vazyme Biotech [Nanjing] Co., Ltd.) to evaluate S100A12, TLR2, MYD88, and NF-κB gene expression. A SYBR Green Master Mix (20 μl; Invitrogen; Vazyme Biotech [Nanjing] Co., Ltd.) was used for real-time PCR amplification. The amplification conditions were as follows: 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 3–10 s and 60°C for 10–30 s. The expression levels were calculated using the 2‑ΔΔCT method, and the levels were normalized against glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as the control blank gene. Results are expressed as fold-changes. Gene-specific primer sequences were designed by Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and are listed in Table 1. All experiments were performed at least three times.

Table 1. The sequence of primers.

Primer Sequence
S100A12 Forward AGCATCTGGAGGGAATTGTCA
S100A12 Reverse GCAATGGCTACCAGGGATATGAA
TLR2 Forward ATCCTCCAATCAGGCTTCTCT
TLR2 Reverse GGACAGGTCAAGGCTTTTTACA
MYD88 Forward GGCTGCTCTCAACATGCGA
MYD88 Reverse CTGTGTCCGCACGTTCAAGA
NF-κB Forward AACAGAGAGGATTTCGTTTCCG
NF-κB Reverse TTTGACCTGAGGGTAAGACTTCT
GAPDH Forward GCACCGTCAAGGCTGAGAAC
GAPDH Reverse TGGTGAAGACGCCAGTGGA

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS 22. The measurement data were tested for normality, and non-normally distributed measurement data were expressed as M (Q1, Q3), with comparisons between groups made by Mann-Whitney U tests. Count data were expressed as the number of cases and compared between groups using the four-compartment table χ2 test, and all differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Differential variables were subjected to a one-way logistic analysis, and p < 0.05 was included in a multifactorial logistic model to screen valuable risk factors and score them according to OR values to establish a predictive scoring model. The total score was calculated for each group of patients, and the maximum Youden index corresponding to the total score cutoff value, sensitivity, and specificity were derived using the subject receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Baseline information and clinical presentation in the no-CALs and CALs groups

Among the 346 patients included in the study, 224 were male and 122 were female, with the no-CALs and CALs groups significantly differing in their sex ratios (180/112 versus 44/10 males/females for no-CALs and CAL, respectively; p = 0.005) and fever duration (5 [5, 6], 6.5 [5, 8]; p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in age, BMI, rash, conjunctival congestion, lip and tongue changes, neck lymph node enlargement, and terminal changes in the limbs (Table 2).

Table 2. Baseline and clinical presentation of the No CALs and CALs groups.

Items Total No CALs CALs U/χ2 P
No. of patients 346 292 54
Gender (M/F) 224/122 180/112 44/10 7.856 0.005
Age(years) 3.41[1.6,5.58] 3.53[1.74,5.72] 3.1[1.05,4.57] -1.666 0.096
BMI 15.47[14.13,16.84] 15.51[14.14,16.8] 15.19[14.04,17.57] -.130 0.897
Fever duration(days) 6[5,7] 5[5,6] 6.5[5,8] -4.267 0.000
Rash (n) 279 233 46 0.848 0.357
Conjunctivitis (n) 307 259 48 0.002 0.968
Lip and tongue changes(n) 298 247 51 3.705 0.054
Lymphadenopathy (n) 233 201 32 1.9 0.168
Extremity changes(n) 248 211 37 0.314 0.575

BMI, Body Mass Index.

Laboratory data for the no-CALs and CALs groups

A total of 32 laboratory tests were analyzed, and significant differences (p < 0.05) were found between the no-CALs and CALs groups for WBC, Hb, CRP, PCT, ESR, SF, FIB, AST/ALT, ALB, Na, IL-10, and TNF-α. There were no significant differences between the two groups for PLT, NLR, pusuria, LDH, CK-MB, TBIL, DBIL, Scr, BUN, CD3+CD4+T counts, CD3+CD8+T counts, CD19+B counts, CD4/CD8+T, IgM, IgG, IgA, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and IFNγ (p > 0.05; Table 3).

Table 3. Laboratory test results between no CALs and CALs groups.

Variable No CALs CALs U/t P
WBC (109/L) 10.47[7.56,14.58] 12.36[9.39,16.5] -2.430 .015
Hb (g/L) 109[103,116] 102[94.75,111] -3.560 .000
PLT count (109/L) 324.5[243.25,424.75] 363.5[249,475.75] -1.776 .076
NLR 2.69[1.32,5.41] 2.67[1.32,6.15] -.233 .816
CRP (mg/L) 47.5[29.03,88.92] 83[40.4,121] -2.854 .004
PCT (ng/ml) 0.44[0.17,1.42] 0.76[0.25,3.06] -2.308 .021
ESR (mm/h) 32.5[14,59] 68[36.75,88] -4.675 .000
SF (ng/ml) 143.79[104.1,207.44] 187.95[146.74,275.69] -3.471 .001
FIB (g/L) 4.78[3.74,6.11] 6.02[4.79,7.02] -3.897 .000
Pusuria (n) 30 8 .961 .327
AST/ALT 1.8[1.08,2.5] 0.86[0.41,1.53] -5.137 .000
LDH (U/L) 316[262,408] 288.5[243.5,400.5] -1.126 .260
CKMB(U/L) 27[20,39] 24[17,32] -1.916 .055
ALB (g/L) 39.1[35.83,41.4] 35.9[31.43,39.9] -3.880 .000
TBIL (μmol/L) 6.25[4.3,9.28] 6.35[4.2,11.93] -.570 .569
DBIL (μmol/L) 2.7[1.9,3.7] 2.65[2.05,7.03] -1.335 .182
Scr (μmol/L) 27.95[23.23,34.88] 27.85[23.28,31.45] -.773 .439
BUN (μmol/L) 3.3[2.6,4] 3.4[2.65,4.2] -.386 .700
Na (mmol/L) 137.9[135.63,139.68] 136.6[134.38,138.23] -2.966 .003
CD3+CD4+T (cells/μl) 327[105.5,890.75] 453[164,1040.25] -1.107 .268
CD3+CD8+T (cells/μl) 543.5[321.25,818.75] 499[253.25,815] -1.131 0.258
CD19+B (cells/μl) 752[486.75,1228] 785[580.25,1355] -1.14 0.254
CD4/CD8+T 1.7[1.18,2.34] 2.05[1.4,2.42] -1.799 .072
IgM (g/L) 0.97[0.73,1.27] 0.9[0.69,1.38] -.675 .499
IgG (g/L) 7.24[5.61,9.04] 7.29[5.08,9.93] -.118 .906
IgA (g/L) 0.82[0.46,1.27] 0.81[0.49,1.52] -.377 .706
IL2 (pg/mL) 3.67[2.95,4.88] 3.49[2.17,4.63] -1.440 .150
IL4 (pg/mL) 3.42[2.7,4.44] 3.03[2.21,4.1] -1.565 .117
IL6 (pg/mL) 74.25[31.02,146.93] 108.03[24.75,350.88] -1.443 .149
IL10 (pg/mL) 12.41[6.54,21.92] 16.79[8.49,33.76] -2.301 .021
IFNγ (pg/mL) 4.2[2.59,8.23] 4.3[2.76,8.62] -.433 .665
TNFα (pg/mL) 5.39[3.52,9.52] 4.56[2.68,6.5] -2.234 .025

WBC, white blood cell; Hb, Haemoglobin; PLT, platelet; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio = neutrophils (×109/L)/lymphocytes (×109/L); CRP, C reactive protein; PCT, procalcitonin; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; SF, serum ferritin; FIB, Fibrinogen. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate transaminase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CK-MB, creatine kinase-MB; ALB, serum albumin; TBIL, total bilirubin; DBIL, direct bilirubin; Scr, Serum creatinine, BUN, Urea nitrogen.

Expression of S100A12, TLR2, MYD88, and NF-κB in the no-CALs and CALs groups

The expression of A100A12 and MYD88 in the CALs group was significantly higher than that in the no-CALs group (p < 0.05); however, differences in the expression of NF-κB and TLR2 between the two groups were not statistically significant (Table 4).

Table 4. Expression of signaling molecules between no CALs and CALs groups.

Variable No CALs CALs U P
S100A12 5.08[2.9,7.95] 10.52[3.72,17.28] -4.450 .000
TLR2 1.67[1.25,2.27] 1.59[0.88,2.3] -.869 .385
MYD88 2.35[1.27,3.12] 2.86[1.35,5.23] -2.069 .039
NFKB 1.18[0.71,2.09] 1.27[0.64,2.71] -.548 .584

Independent risk factors for the development of CALs in KD

A one-way logistic regression analysis was performed for each of the 16 variables with statistically significant differences between groups, in which PCT, IL-10, TNF-α, and MYD88 were not statistically significant in KD with CALs (p > 0.05). Twelve independent variables (sex, fever duration, WBC, Hb, CRP, Ferr, ESR, Fib, AST/ALT, ALB, Na, and S100A12) were subjected to a multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, which determined that fever duration, ESR, AST/ALT, and S100A12 were independent predictors of KD CALs (Table 5).

Table 5. Logistic regression analysis to identify independent factors predicting KD with CALs.

Variable Univariate Multivariate
Curde OR (95%CI) P adjusted OR (95%CI) P
Gender 2.738[1.325,5.658] 0.007
Fever duration (days) 1.455[1.218,1.739] .000 1.432[1.117,1.836] .005
White blood cell (109/L) 1.06[1.014,1.109] .011
Hb (g/L) 0.966[0.943,0.99] .006
CRP (mg/L) 1.008[1.003,1.014] .001
PCT (ng/ml) 1.038[0.97,1.111] .282
Ferr (ng/ml) 1.001[1,1.001] .072
ESR (mm/h) 1.024[1.014,1.035] .000 1.016[1.002,1.03] .021
FIB (g/L) 1.433[1.189,1.727] .000
AST/ALT 0.417[0.287,0.606] .000 0.462[0.288,0.742] .001
ALB (g/L) 0.892[0.842,0.945] .000
Na (mmol/L) 0.889[0.817,0.966] .006
IL-10 (pg/mL) 1.004[0.999,1.009] .142
TNF-α (pg/mL) 0.989[0.963,1.016] .413
S100A12 1.112[1.069,1.156] .000 1.112[1.063,1.163] .000
MYD88 1.054[0.984,1.128] .134

Scoring model development

The independent risk factors fever duration, ESR, AST/ALT, and S100A12 were obtained as cut-off values according to ROC analysis and converted into dichotomous variables; then, a scoring system was established according to the OR values: fever duration ≥ 6.5 d (3 points), ESR ≥ 46.5 (2 points), AST/ALT ≤ 1.52 (1 point), and S100A12 ≤ 10.02 (2 points). The total score was calculated for each individual patient, and the ROC analysis was performed to obtain the cut-off values, where < 3.5 was considered a low risk for CAL and ≥ 3.5 was considered a high risk for CALs. The following were obtained for this scoring system: sensitivity: 0.667, specificity: 0.836, Jorden index: 0.502, positive predictive value: 66.67%, negative predictive value: 83.56%, and area under the curve (AUC): 0.838, in addition to the ROC curve (Table 6 and Fig 2).

Table 6. Cut-off values and points after continuous variables are converted to dichotomous variables.

Variable Cut-off point Sensitivity Specificity OR (95%CI) p Point
Fever duration (days) 6.5000 .500 0.788 1.432[1.117,1.836] .005 3 (> = 6.5), 0(<0.6.5)
ESR (mm/h) 46.5000 .704 0.647 1.016[1.002,1.03] .021 2 (> = 46.5), 0(<46.5)
AST/ALT 1.5147 .759 0.630 0.462[0.288,0.742] .001 1(< = 1.5147),0(>1.5147)
S100A12 10.0155 .556 0.880 1.112[1.063,1.163] .000 2 (> = 10.0155), 0(<10.0155)

Fig 2. ROC curves for prediction of KD with CALs by the new scoring model, AUC: 0.838(95% CI, 0.781–0.895).

Fig 2

Discussion

It has been more than 50 years since the initial diagnostic criteria for KD were established [27], and although many studies have been conducted, the potential for fatal complications still exists for patients with KD combined with CALS, which has become the most common childhood-acquired cardiovascular disease in developed countries and regions [24]. In recent years, developments in molecular biology and clinical medicine techniques have enabled the discovery of biomarkers as predictors of KD with CALs [28].

In our study, we explored the combined clinical indicators S100A12, TLR2, MYD88, and NF-κB to predict the occurrence of KD combined with CALs, and we found S100A12, fever duration, ESR, and AST/ALT were independent risk factors. Previously, Helmut et al. [29] found that the inverse regulation of both sRAGE and its proinflammatory ligand S100A12 seemed to be a relevant molecular mechanism promoting systemic inflammation. Srivastava et al. [30], in their study on an integrated in-silico approach for exploring potential biomarker genes and pathways in KD, identified S100A12 as one of the pivotal genes with high connectivity. Armaroli et al. [9] identified that S100A12 was a highly expressed mediator in KD sterile inflammation. The above studies provide a theoretical basis for the involvement of S100A12 in the occurrence of CALs, while our present study provides real-world evidence; thus, we expect S100A12 to be a useful biomarker of CALs.

The longer the duration of fever in patients with KD, the higher the risk of prolonged inflammatory stimulation and, consequently, severe vasculitis and aneurysms, which were confirmed as risk factors for coronary artery involvement in several studies [31]. Wang et al. [32] found that fevers lasting ≥ 8 days were a predictor of CALs in KD, and Kim et al. [33] confirmed that fever duration ≥ 7 days was a predictor of CALs in patients with KD, while we concluded that fever duration ≥ 6.5 days was an independent risk factor. Our result was slightly shorter than the fever duration length determined in previous studies, which may be related to the current improvement in the ability of pediatricians in China to recognize KD and initiate treatment early once it is diagnosed at this stage [34].

ESR is a recognized marker of the inflammatory response and is susceptible to the size, shape, and number of red blood cells and immunoglobulin levels, making it more meaningful to obtain values prior to gamma globulin treatment. Previous studies have shown that elevated ESR can, to some extent, reflect the inflammatory response in the coronary arteries, and Junyan et al. [35] and Tian et al. [35] confirmed that elevated ESR was a predictor of KD complicated by CALs. The latter authors proposed a sensitivity of 53.26% and specificity of 64.14% for the prediction of CALs using ESR at a critical value > 75 mm/h. In our study, ESR at a critical value ≥ 46.5 mm/h predicted a sensitivity of 70.4% and specificity of 64.7%, which is a higher sensitivity than found in that previous study.

AST is widely distributed in the mitochondria of muscle, brain, lung, kidney, and liver cells, whereas ALT is mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes [36]. The AST/ALT ratio is often used to assess liver function and reflect the severity of liver disease, and in their KD study, Wang et al. [37] confirmed that the smaller the AST/ALT ratio, the stronger the acute inflammatory response and the greater the risk of coronary artery injury and IVIG resistance; the ratio may therefore be a good predictor of coronary artery injury in patients with KD by reflecting the intensity of inflammation. Cao et al. [38] found that the AST/ALT ratio is a risk factor for CALs but is not associated with CAL progression. The current study is the third to confirm that AST/ALT is an independent risk factor for concomitant CALs in patients with KD. Further studies are needed to focus on coronary artery changes in patients with CALs after eight weeks.

In this study, a new scoring model for CALs in KD was established by combining clinical indicators with S100A12/TLR2 signaling molecules. Fever duration ≥ 6.5 days (3 points), ESR ≥ 46.5 mm/h (2 points), AST/ALT ≤ 1.51 (1 point), and S100A12 ≥ 10.02 (2 points) were independent risk factors for KD CALs, with scores < 3.5 presenting as low risk and ≥ 3.5 presenting as high risk. This scoring system had a sensitivity of 0.667, a specificity of 0.836, a Jorden index of 0.502, an AUC of 0.838, and good predictive efficacy. However, there are limitations in this study, one of which is the single method of signal molecule detection, as protein blotting and a flow cytometry assay were not performed for the quantitative validation of the protein. Additionally, the cohort study may have had a bias in the sample selection. Another limitation was the different time intervals for obtaining samples, and the sedation of gamma globulin may have introduced bias in the results. Finally, the sample size of the single-center exploratory study was small, so the results of the research were easily influenced by the objective conditions [39] and the population composition of the laboratory. In future research, it is necessary to expand the sample size for model validation and extrapolate the results across multiple centers.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(XLSX)

S2 Data

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

Ethic approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional review board of Wuhan Children’s Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology (NO.2022R053-E01). Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of the patient.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was partly financed by the Wuhan City Health and Family Planning Commission of clinical medical research major project (No.WX19M03) and Soaring Plan of Youth Talent Development in Wuhan Children's Hospital. Furthermore, it did not interfere with the study’s design and collection, analysis, data interpretation, and manuscript writing. There is no additional external funding received for this study.

References

  • 1.Kawasaki T, Kosaki F, Okawa S, Shigematsu I, Yanagawa H. A new infantile acute febrile mucocutaneous lymph node syndrome (MLNS) prevailing in Japan. Pediatrics. 1974;54: 271–276. doi: 10.1542/peds.54.3.271 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kuo HC. Preventing coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease. Biomed J. 2017;40: 141–146. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2017.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hu J, Ren W. Analysis of the risk factors in prognosis of Kawasaki disease with coronary artery lesions. Front Pediatr. 2021;9: 798148. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.798148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wu MH, Chen HC, Yeh SJ, Lin MT, Huang SC, Huang SK. Prevalence and the long-term coronary risks of patients with Kawasaki disease in a general population <40 years: A national database study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5: 566–570. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eleftheriou D, Levin M, Shingadia D, Tulloh R, Klein NJ, Brogan PA. Management of Kawasaki disease. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99: 74–83. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.JCS Joint Working Group. Guidelines for diagnosis and management of cardiovascular sequelae in Kawasaki disease (JCS 2013). Digest version. Circ J. 2014;78: 2521–2562. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-66-0096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Foell D, Wittkowski H, Vogl T, Roth J. S100 proteins expressed in phagocytes: A novel group of damage-associated molecular pattern molecules. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81: 28–37. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0306170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ye F, Foell D, Hirono KI, Vogl T, Rui C, Yu X, et al. Neutrophil-derived S100A12 is profoundly upregulated in the early stage of acute Kawasaki disease. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94: 840–844. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.05.076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Armaroli G, Verweyen E, Pretzer C, Kessel K, Hirono K, Ichida F, et al. Monocyte-derived interleukin-1β as the driver of S100A12-induced sterile inflammatory activation of human coronary artery endothelial cells: Implications for the pathogenesis of Kawasaki disease. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71: 792–804. doi: 10.1002/art.40784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fu S, Gong F, Xie C, Zhu W, Wang W, Shen H, et al. S100A12 on circulating endothelial cells surface in children with Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Res. 2010;68: 165–168. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181e67ce8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kessel C, Fuehner S, Zell J, Zimmermann B, Drewianka S, Brockmeyer S, et al. Calcium and zinc tune autoinflammatory toll-like receptor 4 signaling by S100A12. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142: 1370–1373.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.06.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Foell D, Wittkowski H, Kessel C, Lüken A, Weinhage T, Varga G, et al. Proinflammatory S100A12 can activate human monocytes via toll-like receptor 4. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187: 1324–1334. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201209-1602OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu BM, Hill HR. Role of host immune and inflammatory responses in COVID-19 cases with underlying primary immunodeficiency: A review. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2020;40: 549–554. doi: 10.1089/jir.2020.0210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wei D, Li NL, Zeng Y, Liu B, Kumthip K, Wang TT, et al. The Molecular Chaperone GRP78 Contributes to toll-like receptor 3-mediated Innate Immune Response to hepatitis C virus in Hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 2016;291: 12294–12309. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.711598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu BM, Martins TB, Peterson LK, Hill HR. Clinical significance of measuring serum cytokine levels as inflammatory biomarkers in adult and pediatric COVID-19 cases: A review. Cytokine. 2021;142: 155478. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kang SJ, Kim NS. Association of toll-like receptor 2-positive monocytes with coronary artery lesions and treatment nonresponse in Kawasaki disease. Korean J Pediatr. 2017;60: 208–215. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2017.60.7.208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Huang YH, Li SC, Huang LH, Chen PC, Lin YY, Lin CC, et al. Identifying genetic hypomethylation and upregulation of toll-like receptors in Kawasaki disease. Oncotarget. 2017;8: 11249–11258. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Takeda K, Akira S. Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. Int Immunol. 2005;17: 1–14. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxh186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rosenkranz ME, Schulte DJ, Agle LM, Wong MH, Zhang W, Ivashkiv L, et al. TLR2 and MyD88 contribute to Lactobacillus casei extract-induced focal coronary arteritis in a mouse model of Kawasaki disease. Circulation. 2005;112: 2966–2973. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.537530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mortazavi SH, Amin R, Alyasin S, Kashef S, Karimi MH, Babaei M, et al. Down-regulation of TLR2, 3, 9 and signaling mediators, MyD88 and TRIF, gene transcript levels in patients with Kawasaki disease treated with IVIG. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;14: 188–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rife E, Gedalia A. Kawasaki disease: An update. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020;22: 75. doi: 10.1007/s11926-020-00941-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Barnabei L, Laplantine E, Mbongo W, Rieux-Laucat F, Weil R. NF-κB: At the borders of autoimmunity and inflammation. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 716469. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.716469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sakurai Y. Autoimmune aspects of Kawasaki disease. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2019;29: 251–261. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, Burns JC, Bolger AF, Gewitz M, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: A scientific statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135: e927–e999. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000484 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Gerber MA, Gewitz MH, Tani LY, Burns JC, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: A statement for health professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, American Heart Association. Circulation. 2004;110: 2747–2771. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145143.19711.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nanishi E, Nishio H, Takada H, Yamamura K, Fukazawa M, Furuno K, et al. Clarithromycin plus intravenous immunoglobulin therapy can reduce the relapse rate of Kawasaki disease: A Phase 2, open-label, randomized control study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kawasaki T. [Acute febrile mucocutaneous syndrome with lymphoid involvement with specific desquamation of the fingers and toes in children]. Arerugi. 1967;16: 178–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xue M, Wang J. Utility of color Doppler echocardiography combined with clinical markers in diagnosis and prediction of prognosis of coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease. Exp Ther Med. 2020;19: 2597–2603. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wittkowski H, Hirono K, Ichida F, Vogl T, Ye F, Yanlin X, et al. Acute Kawasaki disease is associated with reverse regulation of soluble receptor for advance glycation end products and its proinflammatory ligand S100A12. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56: 4174–4181. doi: 10.1002/art.23042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Srivastava P, Bamba C, Pilania RK, Kumari A, Kumrah R, Sil A, et al. Exploration of potential biomarker genes and pathways in Kawasaki disease: An integrated in-silico approach. Front Genet. 2022;13: 849834. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.849834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ram Krishna M, Sundaram B, Dhanalakshmi K. Predictors of coronary artery aneurysms in Kawasaki disease. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014;53: 561–565. doi: 10.1177/0009922814530802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hua W, Ma F, Wang Y, Fu S, Wang W, Xie C, et al. A new scoring system to predict Kawasaki disease with coronary artery lesions. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38: 1099–1107. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4393-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim JJ, Hong YM, Yun SW, Han MK, Lee KY, Song MS, et al. Assessment of risk factors for Korean children with Kawasaki disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33: 513–520. doi: 10.1007/s00246-011-0143-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fukazawa R, Kobayashi J, Ayusawa M, Hamada H, Miura M, Mitani Y, et al. JCS/JSCS 2020 guideline on diagnosis and management of cardiovascular sequelae in Kawasaki disease. Circ J. 2020;84: 1348–1407. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li Y, Wang XM, Liu YL, Shi K, Yang YF, Guo YH. [Risk factors for coronary artery lesions in children with Kawasaki disease]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2012;14: 938–941. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rej R. Aspartate aminotransferase activity and isoenzyme proportions in human liver tissues. Clin Chem. 1978;24: 1971–1979. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/24.11.1971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang J, Li J, Ren Y, Shi H, Rong X, Zhang X, et al. Association between alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase ratio (AST/ALT ratio) and coronary artery injury in children with Kawasaki disease. Cardiol Res Pract. 2020;2020: 8743548. doi: 10.1155/2020/8743548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cao L, Tang YJ, Gang M, Ma J, Qian WG, Xu QQ, et al. AST-to-ALT ratio and coronary artery lesions among patients with Kawasaki disease. World J Pediatr. 2021;17: 659–668. doi: 10.1007/s12519-021-00479-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu B, Forman M, Valsamakis A. Optimization and evaluation of a novel real-time RT-PCR test for detection of Parechovirus in cerebrospinal fluid. J Virol Methods. 2019;272: 113690. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.113690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Benjamin M Liu

4 Sep 2023

PONE-D-23-26094Clinical indicators combined with S100A12/TLR2 signaling molecules to establish a new scoring model for coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki diseasePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ding,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 19 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Benjamin M. Liu, MBBS, PhD, D(ABMM), MB(ASCP)

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following: 

● The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

● A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

● A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)"

3. Thank you for stating in your Funding Statement: "This work was supported partly by the Wuhan City Health and Family Planning Commission of clinical medical research major project (No.WX19M03) and Soaring Plan of Youth Talent Development in Wuhan Children's Hospital".

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now.  Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement. 

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "YES

This work was supported partly by the Wuhan City Health and Family Planning Commission of clinical medical research major project (No.WX19M03) and Soaring Plan of Youth Talent Development in Wuhan Children's Hospital".

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. Introduction section: there is only one paragraphs in this part, which should be improved. At least two more paragraphs should be added to discuss the following points: S100A12 and TLR signaling molecules have not yet reported as an indicators of Kawasaki diseases. However, TLRs are know to play important roles in innate immunity and involvement with immunodeficiency and COVID-19. The application of TLRs and cytokine and other biomarkers in severe COVID and MIS-C (similar to Kawasaki) may set a good example to illustrate the progress of novel biomarker application in rare or severe infections, which will allow the readers to better understand the novelty of the authors' work on Kawasaki disease. The authors should introduce/discuss the above-mentioned and the following key points based on the following references: role of TLRs in human diseases (e.g. different infectious diseases, such as HCV or COVID), host immune/inflammatory biomarkers (TLRs, cytokines), pros and cons of biomarker detection, and differentiation between Kawasaki and MIS-C.

Wei D, Li NL, Zeng Y, Liu B, Kumthip K, Wang TT, Huo D, Ingels JF, Lu L, Shang J, Li K. The Molecular Chaperone GRP78 Contributes to Toll-like Receptor 3-mediated Innate Immune Response to Hepatitis C Virus in Hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 2016 Jun 3;291(23):12294-309. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.711598. Epub 2016 Apr 20. PMID: 27129228; PMCID: PMC4933277.

Liu BM, Martins TB, Peterson LK, Hill HR. Clinical significance of measuring serum cytokine levels as inflammatory biomarkers in adult and pediatric COVID-19 cases: A review. Cytokine. 2021 Jun;142:155478. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155478. Epub 2021 Feb 23. PMID: 33667962; PMCID: PMC7901304.

McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, Burns JC, Bolger AF, Gewitz M, Baker AL, Jackson MA, Takahashi M, Shah PB, Kobayashi T, Wu MH, Saji TT, Pahl E; American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Long-Term Management of Kawasaki Disease: A Scientific Statement for Health Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):e927-e999. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000484. Epub 2017 Mar 29. Erratum in: Circulation. 2019 Jul 30;140(5):e181-e184. PMID: 28356445.

Liu B, Hill HR. Role of Host Immune and Inflammatory Responses in COVID-19 Cases with Underlying Primary Immunodeficiency: A Review. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2020 Dec;40(12):549-554. doi: 10.1089/jir.2020.0210. PMID: 33337932; PMCID: PMC7757688.

2. For inclusion criteria, what did the author mean by "complete data"?

3. Is the statistical analysis two-tailed or one-tailed?

4. What reverse transcriptase (RT) did the authors use? What internal control gene did the RT-PCR of S100A12, TLR2, MYD88, and NFKB benchmark to? The differences in the expression of NF-κB and TLR2 between the two groups were not statistically significant. What are the limit of detection or analytical sensitivity of these RT-PCR? According to the following ref, different RTs with varied efficiency may cause unreliable results. Please discuss this based on this reference.

Liu B, Forman M, Valsamakis A. Optimization and evaluation of a novel real-time RT-PCR test for detection of parechovirus in cerebrospinal fluid. J Virol Methods. 2019 Oct;272:113690. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.113690. Epub 2019 Jul 5. PMID: 31283959.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 12;18(10):e0292653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292653.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


25 Sep 2023

Reviewer #1: 1. Introduction section: there is only one paragraphs in this part, which should be improved. At least two more paragraphs should be added to discuss the following points: S100A12 and TLR signaling molecules have not yet reported as an indicators of Kawasaki diseases. However, TLRs are know to play important roles in innate immunity and involvement with immunodeficiency and COVID-19. The application of TLRs and cytokine and other biomarkers in severe COVID and MIS-C (similar to Kawasaki) may set a good example to illustrate the progress of novel biomarker application in rare or severe infections, which will allow the readers to better understand the novelty of the authors' work on Kawasaki disease. The authors should introduce/discuss the above-mentioned and the following key points based on the following references: role of TLRs in human diseases (e.g. different infectious diseases, such as HCV or COVID), host immune/inflammatory biomarkers (TLRs, cytokines), pros and cons of biomarker detection, and differentiation between Kawasaki and MIS-C.

Wei D, Li NL, Zeng Y, Liu B, Kumthip K, Wang TT, Huo D, Ingels JF, Lu L, Shang J, Li K. The Molecular Chaperone GRP78 Contributes to Toll-like Receptor 3-mediated Innate Immune Response to Hepatitis C Virus in Hepatocytes. J Biol Chem. 2016 Jun 3;291(23):12294-309. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.711598. Epub 2016 Apr 20. PMID: 27129228; PMCID: PMC4933277.

Liu BM, Martins TB, Peterson LK, Hill HR. Clinical significance of measuring serum cytokine levels as inflammatory biomarkers in adult and pediatric COVID-19 cases: A review. Cytokine. 2021 Jun;142:155478. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2021.155478. Epub 2021 Feb 23. PMID: 33667962; PMCID: PMC7901304.

McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, Burns JC, Bolger AF, Gewitz M, Baker AL, Jackson MA, Takahashi M, Shah PB, Kobayashi T, Wu MH, Saji TT, Pahl E; American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Long-Term Management of Kawasaki Disease: A Scientific Statement for Health Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Apr 25;135(17):e927-e999. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000484. Epub 2017 Mar 29. Erratum in: Circulation. 2019 Jul 30;140(5):e181-e184. PMID: 28356445.

Liu B, Hill HR. Role of Host Immune and Inflammatory Responses in COVID-19 Cases with Underlying Primary Immunodeficiency: A Review. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2020 Dec;40(12):549-554. doi: 10.1089/jir.2020.0210. PMID: 33337932; PMCID: PMC7757688.

R: Thank you very much for your time involved in reviewing the manuscript and we also appreciate your clear and detailed feedback. We very much agree with your suggestions, and after carefully studying the literature you recommended, we have added parts to the introduction section and cited the references you recommended.

The corrections and additions are in the introduction section and are marked in red.

The additions are as follows: Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute febrile disease of unknown etiology, characterized by systemic inflammation and vasculitis [1]. In contrast to Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) related to Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), KD mostly occurs in children over five years of age. The most common complication of KD is coronary artery disease, especially coronary artery lesions (CALs) such as coronary artery dilation, aneurysm, coronary artery thrombosis and stenosis, life-threatening coronary aneurysm rupture, myocardial infarction, and heart failure in severe cases [2,3]. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and aspirin in KD has significantly decreased the incidence of CALs, but CALs are still observed in 5–20% of patients in the acute phase [4–6]. Nevertheless, the pathogenesis of CALS due to KD is currently unclear, and no validated biomarkers are available to predict the occurrence of this complication. Therefore, it is challenging for clinicians to predict the occurrence of CALs and implement effective intervention measures. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy of clinical indicators combined with S100A12/TLR2-related signaling molecules in predicting KD with CALs and provide a basis for understanding the pathogenesis of CALs, and assist clinical decision-making.

A member of the calcium-binding S100 family, S100A12 activates inflammatory responses by binding to multiple receptors extracellularly in damage-related molecular patterns [7]. Previous studies have found that neutrophils in the early stage of KD can secrete S100A12 [8] to promote KD coronary artery lesions through the synergistic activation of endothelial cells [9,10], whereas S100A12 strictly depends on pattern recognition receptors, such as toll like receptors (TLRs), to function in vivo [11,12]. The S100A12 and TLR signaling molecules have not yet been reported as indicators of KD. TLRs are important in innate immunity, immunodeficiency, and COVID-19 [13,14]. The application of TLRs, cytokines, and other biomarkers in severe COVID and MIS-C (similar to KD) may provide a good example to illustrate the progress of novel biomarker application in rare or severe infections [15]. TLR2 has been reported to predict CAL progression in patients with KD [16,17], and a study by Soo et al. found that the high expression of TLR2 in single-nucleated cells was correlated with CALs and non-response in KD [16]. Highly expressed TLR can activate the signaling mediators domain-containing adapter-induced interferon-β (TRIF) and Myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MYD88), allowing nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kB) activation to promote TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, and other pro-inflammatory factors [18]. Previous studies have confirmed that TLR2 and MyD88 contribute to Lactobacillus casei extract-induced focal coronary arteritis in a mouse model of KD [19], and Seyed et al. found that TLR2, TLR3, TLR9, MYD88, and TRIF gene transcript levels were upregulated in KD patients before IVIG treatment and downregulated after treatment [20]. In addition, several studies have found that NF-κB is involved in the development and progression of KD by participating in the inflammatory response, regulating the release of inflammatory factors [21], participating in immune activation [22], and inducing vascular endothelial damage [23]. Therefore, we envision that S100A12/TLR2 may activate the immune response of KD and may be involved in the development of CALs in KD by inducing the high expression of NF-κB by MYD88.

2. For inclusion criteria, what did the author mean by "complete data"?

R: Thanks for pointing out the inaccurate description. "complete data" means “The case information is complete”, therefore ' complete data ' has been corrected to ‘case information’.

3. Is the statistical analysis two-tailed or one-tailed?

R: Thanks for your comments! Although some clinical indicators have been proved to be valuable in the diagnosis of KD, its optimal cut-off point, diagnostic efficacy, and the value of the combined S100A12/TLR2 diagnostic model were still unclear, thus the two-tailed test statistical analysis was more favored chosen to be used here.

4. What reverse transcriptase (RT) did the authors use? What internal control gene did the RT-PCR of S100A12, TLR2, MYD88, and NFKB benchmark to? The differences in the expression of NF-κB and TLR2 between the two groups were not statistically significant. What are the limit of detection or analytical sensitivity of these RT-PCR? According to the following ref, different RTs with varied efficiency may cause unreliable results. Please discuss this based on this reference.

Liu B, Forman M, Valsamakis A. Optimization and evaluation of a novel real-time RT-PCR test for detection of parechovirus in cerebrospinal fluid. J Virol Methods. 2019 Oct;272:113690. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.113690. Epub 2019 Jul 5. PMID: 31283959.

R: Thanks for your comments! According to your suggestions, we have carefully read the above literatures. In this study, the author compares the detection value of four commercial kits for parechoviruses (HPeV), including the performance characteristics of the detection system, influencing factors and other aspects, and finally concludes the optimal enzyme volume and the best approach to add MS2, which is a relatively comprehensive comparison of detection methods. However, there are many differences between this study and the paper. First, this study focuses on relatively stable genes (S100A12, TLR2, MYD88, and NF-κB), which are different from viruses with more genetic diversity, so it is not necessary to consider the detection status of different subtypes. Second, the detection of the virus needs to consider the detection limit, sensitivity, specificity of the reagent and various influencing factors in the experiment are closely related. In this study, the main detection targets are typical key molecules in the NF-κB/TLR2 pathway, and they also have certain expression levels in normal health’s, but they are significantly increased in diseases, so the detection of these genes is relatively less affected by detection factors in the same methodology (Exp Ther Med. 2022 Jun 30;24(3):543.; Front Immunol. 2022 Jan 19; 12:767512.; Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2022 Jul-Sep;14(3):188-195.). Third: this paper was to detect the expression of virus in cerebrospinal fluid, with poor sensitivity, while in this study (J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jul;55(7):2035-2044.), we detected the expression of mononuclear cells in blood, with high sensitivity. We apologize for the lack of detail in the presentation of our materials and methods, and we have corrected it accordingly in methods and marked it in red.

RNA was extracted from the PBMC samples using TRIzol reagent and stored at -70℃, and the RNA concentration and purity were measured with the NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Massachusetts, USA) spectrophotometer. RNAs were converted into cDNA by reverse transcription using the PrimeScript TM RT Reagent kit (Vazyme Biotech [Nanjing] Co., Ltd. CHINA). Following cDNA synthesis, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and relative quantification were performed using Premix Ex Taq SYBR (Vazyme Biotech [Nanjing] Co., Ltd.) to evaluate S100A12, TLR2, MYD88, and NF-κB gene expression. A SYBR Green Master Mix (20 µl; Invitrogen; Vazyme Biotech [Nanjing] Co., Ltd.) was used for real-time PCR amplification. The amplification conditions were as follows: 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 3–10 s and 60°C for 10–30 s. The expression levels were calculated using the 2‑ΔΔCT method, and the levels were normalized against glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as the control blank gene. Results are expressed as fold-changes. Gene-specific primer sequences were designed by Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and are listed in Table 1. All experiments were performed at least three times.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers--9.24.docx

Decision Letter 1

Benjamin M Liu

27 Sep 2023

Clinical indicators combined with S100A12/TLR2 signaling molecules to establish a new scoring model for coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease

PONE-D-23-26094R1

Dear Dr. Ding,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Benjamin M. Liu, MBBS, PhD, D(ABMM), MB(ASCP)

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Benjamin M Liu

3 Oct 2023

PONE-D-23-26094R1

Clinical indicators combined with S100A12/TLR2 signaling molecules to establish a new scoring model for coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease

Dear Dr. Ding:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Benjamin M. Liu

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    S2 Data

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers--9.24.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES