Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2023 Sep 12;15(9):e45125. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45125

Epidural Steroid Injection Prior to Spinal Surgery: A Step-Wise and Wise Approach

Michael Kozak 1,, David R Hallan 1, Elias Rizk 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC10569744  PMID: 37842405

Abstract

Background: An epidural steroid injection (ESI) is used to treat a number of morbid central nervous system pathologies and is considered a reasonably safe procedure. This study aimed to determine the relative infection risk after spinal surgery by comparing outcomes in spinal surgery patients who received an ESI shortly prior to the surgery against those who did not receive an ESI shortly prior to the surgery.

Methods: The present study is a retrospective cohort study using a multi-institutional healthcare database, TriNetX, to collect data on patients who received spinal surgery with and without having had ESIs six months before surgery. Two cohorts were generated: Cohort 1 included patients who had received an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery, and cohort 2 included patients who did not have an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery. The patients in cohort 2 had propensity scores matched 1:1 to those in cohort 1 using common baseline demographics, comorbidities and spinal procedure indications. The spinal procedures and surgeries considered for the analysis included open procedures for any purpose, including exploration, decompression, resection, revision or biopsy. Multiple outcomes were compared across these two cohorts in the three months following the spinal procedure/surgery, including the occurrence of death, surgical site infection, epidural and/or spinal abscess, and dural tear.

Results: An ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery was associated with a significant decrease in the likelihood epidural/spinal abscess in the three months after surgery. There was no change in mortality, wound infection or identification of dural tear in the three months after spinal surgery for those who received an ESI six months before spinal surgery.

Conclusion: This data suggests that epidural steroid injections' anti-inflammatory effects provide benefits before surgery beyond symptomatic relief. Given that the degeneration of spinal pathologies is typically advanced rather than corrected by the body's inflammatory response, it is likely that preventing hyperactivation of the body's immune system in the months preceding surgical intervention, a traumatic insult, is protective compared to no intervention and, importantly, without major adverse effects.

Keywords: dural tear, spinal abscess, spinal surgery, epidural steroid injection, esi

Introduction

Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) have been in use for more than 50 years to treat a number of morbid central nervous system (CNS) pathologies, including disc herniation, spinal arthritis, discogenic pain and others. Chronic low back and neck pain are two of the most morbid conditions of modern times [1]. Epidural steroid injections to the spine deliver corticosteroids directly above the dura, just deep to the ligamentum flavum, to facilitate localized anti-inflammatory effects and reduce the compression of nerves and the spinal cord to relieve symptoms temporarily. Epidural steroid injections may be classified by location (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar) and the needle's path (interlaminar, transforaminal, or caudal) [2]. An ESI is considered a temporizing measure for pain; however, there is not good evidence for its efficacy [3-4]. Additionally, it is not a permanent solution [5]. For most patients without traditional 'red flag' symptoms such as weakness, bowel/bladder incontinence, or saddle anesthesia, the traditional management of patients presenting with back pain begins with physical therapy and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and if these fail, often an ESI is trialed prior to the surgery. While there is no consensus as to the timing, the frequency or duration of ESI treatment for most spinal pathologies, more than half of surgeons report offering an ESI when other conservative methods fail, prior to proposing surgical intervention [6].

An ESI is considered a reasonably safe procedure. However, it is associated with several complications, such as hematoma, allergic reactions, and infection [7]. Infections can worsen a patient's condition from their pre-procedure baseline. Likewise, infections after spinal surgery have a considerable impact on recovery. The reported incidence of surgical site infection after spinal surgery ranges substantially depending on the indication and procedure (0.5%-20%). In contrast, less invasive procedures tend to have lower rates of post-procedural infection [8].

Spinal epidural injection is the precedent intervention to a considerable number of sub-acute spinal surgeries; for example, more than 45% cases of lumbar spinal stenosis or disc herniation received ESIs in the 12 months prior to surgery [9]. For this reason, there is considerable interest in the effect of an ESI on post-surgical outcomes for those receiving ESIs before surgery. The rationale is that the epidural space was only recently invaded by a delivery needle delivering anti-inflammatory steroids, thus creating functional local immunosuppression with potential tissue damage.

This study aims to leverage a large, multi-institutional healthcare database of patient information to determine the relative infection risk of spinal surgery when an ESI was given shortly prior to surgery by comparing outcomes in spinal surgery patients who received an ESI shortly prior to surgery versus those who did not receive an ESI shortly prior to surgery.

Materials and methods

The present study is a retrospective cohort study using a multi-institutional healthcare database, TriNetX, to collect data from up to 102 different healthcare organizations (HCOs) on patients who received spinal surgery with and without having had epidural steroid injections six months before surgery. The TriNetX United States (US) Collaborative Network, containing information from 86,401,400 de-identified patients collected over 20 years, was accessed on May 29, 2023, to stratify patients into two cohorts. Cohort 1 included patients who had received an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery, and Cohort 2 included patients who did not have an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery. A period of six months was chosen because other studies have indicated that six months is the longest expected time for improved functional status after an ESI and because the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services supports no more than four ESI injections over any rolling 12-month period [10-11]. The patients in cohort 2 also had propensity scores matched 1:1 to those in cohort 1, using common baseline demographics and comorbidities such as age, gender, ethnicity, race, medication-related immunodeficiency, as well as medical histories including cardiovascular disease, alcohol use, tobacco use, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, hypertensive disorders and traumatic central nervous system injuries. Additionally, indications for an epidural steroid injection and/or spinal surgery were propensity matched for the most common indications including radiculopathy, osteoporosis, degenerative disc disease, primary neoplasm of the spinal cord and meninges, metastases to spinal cord and meninges, discitis, vertebral fractures, spinal stenosis, cauda equina and conus medullaris among other spinal pathologies. The index date was set as the date of spinal surgery. The TriNetX database is federated. Thus, an institutional review board approval for this study has been waived.

The spinal procedures and surgeries considered for the analysis included open, endoscopic and percutaneous procedures for any purpose, including exploration, decompression, resection, revision or biopsy. They included the following procedures at all levels along the spinal cord: discectomy, laminectomy, facetectomy, foraminotomy, decompression, release, arthrodesis, excision, biopsy, and resection.

Multiple outcomes were compared across these two cohorts in the three months following the spinal procedure/surgery, including the occurrence of death, surgical site infection, epidural and/or spinal abscess, and dural tear.

All statistical analyses were performed using the TriNetX online platform. Descriptive measures, such as means with standard deviations and proportions, were used to describe patient characteristics. For each outcome, the risk ratio, relative risk, and odds ratio were calculated to estimate the effects of a recent ESI on the outcomes. An a priori-defined two-sided alpha value of <0.05 was used for statistical significance.

Results

Among all qualifying patients in the database, 23,549 patients (cohort 1) underwent a spinal surgery or procedure six months after receiving a spinal epidural injection. In addition, 389,916 patients in the database underwent a spinal procedure without receiving a spinal epidural injection in the preceding six months. Mean age, gender ratio, ethnicity, and comorbid conditions were substantially dissimilar in both groups before propensity matching (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics of cohorts before propensity score matching.

ESI, epidural steroid injection; ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision

Cohort 1 = ESI in the six months leading up to surgery

Cohort 2 = no ESI in the six months leading up to surgery

Code is the ICD-10 code from patient charts for diagnoses, procedures and medications.

Baseline characteristics before propensity matching
Demographics
Cohort Code Characteristic Mean ± SD Patients % of cohort p-value Std. diff.
1 AI Age at index (years) 57.8 ± 15.2 23,549 100 <0.001 0.045
2 57.1 ± 16.9 389,916 100
1 2106-3 White - 18,689 79.4 <0.001 0.265
2 264,327 67.8
1 F Female - 11,481 48.8 <0.001 0.048
2 180,789 46.4
1 2054-5 Black or African American - 1,400 5.9 <0.001 0.104
2 33,684 8.6
1 2028-9 Asian - 359 1.5 <0.001 0.072
2 9,886 2.5
1 M Male - 12,068 51.2 <0.001 0.046
2 208,779 53.5
1 2131-1 Unknown race - 2,991 12.7 <0.001 0.072
2 78,862 20.2
Diagnoses
Cohort Code Characteristic Patients % of cohort p-value Std. diff.
1 I10-I16 Hypertensive diseases 10,561 44.8 <0.001 0.120
2 151,775 38.9
1 E78 Disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidemias 7,899 33.5 <0.001 0.178
2 99,225 25.4
1 E08-E13 Diabetes mellitus 3,675 15.6 <0.001 0.010
2 59,509 15.3
1 E65-E68 Overweight, obesity and other hyperalimentation 4,396 18.7 <0.001 0.115
2 56,147 14.4
1 N17-N19 Acute kidney failure and chronic kidney disease 1,435 6.1 0.102 0.011
2 24,803 6.4
1 Z87.891 Personal history of nicotine dependence 2,679 11.4 <0.001 0.040
2 39,551 10.1
1 F17 Nicotine dependence 2,987 12.7 <0.001 0.038
2 44,681 11.5
1 F10.1 Alcohol abuse 280 1.2 <0.001 0.028
2 5,876 1.5
1 F10.2 Alcohol dependence 171 0.7 0.001 0.024
2 3,681 0.9
1 J40-J47 Chronic lower respiratory diseases 3,186 13.5 <0.001 0.057
2 45,386 11.6
1 I48 Atrial fibrillation and flutter 906 3.8 0.004 0.020
2 16,537 4.2
1 I50 Heart failure 574 2.4 <0.001 0.037
2 11,838 3.0
1 I20-I25 Ischemic heart diseases 2,433 10.3 <0.001 0.028
2 36,985 9.5
1 I73 Other peripheral vascular diseases 645 2.7 <0.001 0.040
2 8,281 2.1
1 R40 Somnolence, stupor and coma 172 0.7 <0.001 0.081
2 6,244 1.6
1 R53 Malaise and fatigue 1,692 7.2 0.743 0.002
2 27,795 7.1
1 R13 Aphagia and dysphagia 380 1.6 <0.001 0.092
2 11,682 3.0
1 S06.6 Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage 10 0.0 <0.001 0.074
2 1,500 0.4
1 S06.3 Focal traumatic brain injury 10 0.0 <0.001 0.050
2 878 0.2
1 S06.4 Epidural hemorrhage 12 0.1 <0.001 0.084
2 1,880 0.5
1 S06.1 Traumatic cerebral edema 10 0.0 0.173 0.010
2 256 0.1
1 R51 Headache 911 3.9 <0.001 0.048
2 11,692 3.0
1 D84.9 Immunodeficiency, unspecified 71 0.3 0.004 0.018
2 829 0.2
1 Z79.899 Other long-term (current) drug therapy 3,368 14.3 <0.001 0.124
2 39,895 10.2
1 M54.5 Low back pain 12,658 53.8 <0.001 0.701
2 84,531 21.7
1 M54.1 Radiculopathy 17,447 74.1 <0.001 0.983
2 117,104 30.0
1 M81.0 Age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture 1,078 4.6 <0.001 0.083
2 11,658 3.0
1 M51.36 Other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region 9,376 39.8 <0.001 0.563
2 60,633 15.6
1 M47.816 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, lumbar region 4,434 18.8 <0.001 0.310
2 32,449 8.3
1 M51.16 Intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy, lumbar region 5,202 22.1 <0.001 0.413
2 30,018 7.7
1 C61 Malignant neoplasm of prostate 312 1.3 <0.001 0.025
2 4,125 1.1
1 C79.31 Secondary malignant neoplasm of brain 33 0.1 <0.001 0.050
2 1,549 0.4
1 C79.49 Secondary malignant neoplasm of other parts of nervous system 32 0.1 <0.001 0.081
2 2,500 0.6
1 C79.32 Secondary malignant neoplasm of cerebral meninges 18 0.1 0.433 0.005
2 360 0.1
1 M47 Spondylosis 11,832 50.2 <0.001 0.347
2 130,142 33.4
1 M48.00 Spinal stenosis, site unspecified 1,571 6.7 <0.001 0.128
2 14,880 3.8
1 M47.819 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, site unspecified 522 2.2 <0.001 0.115
2 3,172 0.8
1 M46.4 Discitis, unspecified 594 2.5 0.001 0.022
2 8,517 2.2
1 M46.47 Discitis, unspecified, lumbosacral region 505 2.1 <0.001 0.102
2 3,485 0.9
1 M46.40 Discitis, unspecified, site unspecified 56 0.2 <0.001 0.050
2 2,136 0.5
1 M46.46 Discitis, unspecified, lumbar region 27 0.1 <0.001 0.068
2 1,904 0.5
1 M46.45 Discitis, unspecified, thoracolumbar region 21 0.1 <0.001 0.030
2 796 0.2
1 D49.2 Neoplasm of unspecified behavior of bone, soft tissue, and skin 98 0.4 <0.001 0.100
2 5,258 1.3
1 C72.0 Malignant neoplasm of spinal cord 10 0.0 <0.001 0.074
2 1,501 0.4
1 D21 Other benign neoplasms of connective and other soft tissue 49 0.2 0.789 0.002
2 780 0.2
1 C49 Malignant neoplasm of other connective and soft tissue 32 0.1 0.008 0.020
2 851 0.2
1 S32.0 Fracture of lumbar vertebra 410 1.7 <0.001 0.076
2 11,206 2.9
1 S12 Fracture of cervical vertebra and other parts of neck 205 0.9 <0.001 0.179
2 13,528 3.5
1 S32 Fracture of lumbar spine and pelvis 503 2.1 <0.001 0.077
2 13,245 3.4
1 S12.9XXA Fracture of neck, unspecified, initial encounter 60 0.3 <0.001 0.125
2 5,370 1.4
1 S82.11 Fracture of tibial spine 10 0.0 0.117 0.009
2 99 0.0
1 G83.4 Cauda equina syndrome 254 1.1 <0.001 0.060
2 7,001 1.8
1 M48.0 Spinal stenosis 16,881 71.7 <0.001 0.344
2 215,932 55.4
1 G95.81 Conus medullaris syndrome 10 0.0 0.015 0.019
2 354 0.1
1 G95.89 Other specified diseases of spinal cord 258 1.1 <0.001 0.121
2 10,712 2.7
Procedures
Cohort Code Characteristic Patients % of cohort p-value Std. diff.
1 31500 Intubation, endotracheal, emergency procedure 11 0.0 <0.001 0.081
2 1,759 0.5
Medications
Cohort Code   Patients % of cohort p-value Std. diff.
1 11289 Warfarin 233 1.0 0.374 0.006
2 3,634 0.9
1 1364430 Apixaban 185 0.8 0.256 0.008
2 3,336 0.9
1 1114195 Rivaroxaban 120 0.5 0.868 0.001
2 2,018 0.5
1 1191 Aspirin 3,860 16.4 <0.001 0.138
2 45,245 11.6
1 32968 Clopidogrel 290 1.2 0.002 0.022
2 5,795 1.5
1 3521 Dipyridamole 19 0.1 0.408 0.006
2 382 0.1
1 613391 Prasugrel 13 0.1 0.952 <0.001
2 219 0.1

After propensity-matched data analysis, 23,539 patients remained in both cohorts (Table 2). Therefore, the reported analyses were performed after propensity matching. The results are presented in Table 3.

Table 2. Patient demographics, diagnoses, procedures and medications for cohorts after propensity matching.

ESI, epidural steroid injection; ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision

Cohort 1 = ESI in the six months leading up to surgery

Cohort 2 = no ESI in the six months leading up to surgery

Code is the ICD-10 code from patient charts for diagnoses, procedures and medications.

Characteristics after propensity matching
Demographics
Cohort Code Characteristic Mean ± SD Patients % of cohort p-value Std. diff.
1 AI Age at index (years) 57.8 ± 15.2 23,539 100 0.573 0.005
2 57.7 ± 15.0 23,539 100
1 2106-3 White - 18,679 79.4 0.057 0.004
2 18,845 80.1
1 F Female - 11,471 48.7 0.678 0.006
2 11,426 48.5
1 2054-5 Black or African American - 1,400 5.9 0.531 0.006
2 1,368 5.8
1 2028-9 Asian - 359 1.5 0.319 0.009
2 333 1.4
1 M Male - 12,068 51.3 0.782 0.003
2 12,098 51.4
1 2131-1 Unknown race - 2,991 12.7 0.125 0.014
2 2,881 12.2
Diagnoses
Cohort Code Characteristic Patients % of cohort p-value Std. diff.
1 I10-I16 Hypertensive diseases 10,559 44.9 0.001 0.032
2 10,186 43.3
1 E78 Disorders of lipoprotein metabolism and other lipidemias 7,894 33.5 <0.001 0.036
2 7,496 31.8
1 E08-E13 Diabetes mellitus 3,675 15.6 0.008 0.024
2 3,469 14.7
1 E65-E68 Overweight, obesity and other hyperalimentation 4,395 18.7 0.001 0.030
2 4,127 17.5
1 N17-N19 Acute kidney failure and chronic kidney disease 1,433 6.1 0.013 0.023
2 1,307 5.6
1 Z87.891 Personal history of nicotine dependence 2,679 11.4 0.003 0.028
2 2,475 10.5
1 F17 Nicotine dependence 2,987 12.7 0.412 0.008
2 2,928 12.4
1 F10.1 Alcohol abuse 280 1.2 0.277 0.010
2 255 1.1
1 F10.2 Alcohol dependence 171 0.7 0.870 0.002
2 168 0.7
1 J40-J47 Chronic lower respiratory diseases 3,185 13.5 0.004 0.026
2 2,977 12.6
1 I48 Atrial fibrillation and flutter 906 3.8 0.181 0.012
2 851 3.6
1 I50 Heart failure 574 2.4 0.026 0.020
2 502 2.1
1 I20-I25 Ischemic heart diseases 2,432 10.3 0.017 0.022
2 2,277 9.7
1 I73 Other peripheral vascular diseases 645 2.7 0.569 0.005
2 625 2.7
1 R40 Somnolence, stupor and coma 172 0.7 0.089 0.016
2 142 0.6
1 R53 Malaise and fatigue 1,692 7.2 0.001 0.030
2 1,516 6.4
1 R13 Aphagia and dysphagia 380 1.6 0.030 0.020
2 323 1.4
1 S06.6 Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage 10 0.0 1 <0.001
2 10 0.0
1 S06.3 Focal traumatic brain injury 10 0.0 1 <0.001
2 10 0.0
1 S06.4 Epidural hemorrhage 12 0.1 0.670 0.004
2 10 0.0
1 S06.1 Traumatic cerebral edema 10 0.0 1 <0.001
2 10 0.0
1 R51 Headache 911 3.9 0.208 0.012
2 859 3.6
1 D84.9 Immunodeficiency, unspecified 70 0.3 0.015 0.022
2 44 0.2
1 Z79.899 Other long-term (current) drug therapy 3,367 14.3 0.001 0.030
2 3,126 13.3
1 M54.5 Low back pain 12,648 53.7 0.305 0.009
2 12,759 54.2
1 M54.1 Radiculopathy 17,437 74.1 0.220 0.011
2 17,320 73.6
1 M81.0 Age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture 1,075 4.6 0.773 0.003
2 1,062 4.5
1 M51.36 Other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region 9,366 39.8 0.821 0.002
2 9,342 39.7
1 M47.816 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, lumbar region 4,427 18.8 0.169 0.013
2 4,311 18.3
1 M51.16 Intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy, lumbar region 5,192 22.1 0.338 0.009
2 5,106 21.7
1 C61 Malignant neoplasm of prostate 312 1.3 0.285 0.010
2 286 1.2
1 C79.31 Secondary malignant neoplasm of brain 33 0.1 0.102 0.015
2 21 0.1
1 C79.49 Secondary malignant neoplasm of other parts of nervous system 32 0.1 0.605 0.005
2 28 0.1
1 C79.32 Secondary malignant neoplasm of cerebral meninges 18 0.1 0.130 0.014
2 10 0.0
1 M47 Spondylosis 11,822 50.2 <0.001 0.041
2 11,342 48.2
1 M48.00 Spinal stenosis, site unspecified 1,568 6.7 0.218 0.011
2 1,502 6.4
1 M47.819 Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, site unspecified 519 2.2 0.613 0.005
2 503 2.1
1 M46.4 Discitis, unspecified 592 2.5 0.573 0.005
2 573 2.4
1 M46.47 Discitis, unspecified, lumbosacral region 503 2.1 0.653 0.004
2 489 2.1
1 M46.40 Discitis, unspecified, site unspecified 56 0.2 0.465 0.007
2 64 0.3
1 M46.46 Discitis, unspecified, lumbar region 27 0.1 0.599 0.005
2 31 0.1
1 M46.45 Discitis, unspecified, thoracolumbar region 21 0.1 0.117 0.014
2 12 0.1
1 D49.2 Neoplasm of unspecified behavior of bone, soft tissue, and skin 98 0.4 0.610 0.005
2 91 0.4
1 C72.0 Malignant neoplasm of spinal cord 10 0.0 0.670 0.004
2 12 0.1
1 D21 Other benign neoplasms of connective and other soft tissue 49 0.2 0.692 0.004
2 53 0.2
1 C49 Malignant neoplasm of other connective and soft tissue 32 0.1 0.354 0.009
2 25 0.1
1 S32.0 Fracture of lumbar vertebra 410 1.7 0.026 0.021
2 349 1.5
1 S12 Fracture of cervical vertebra and other parts of neck 205 0.9 0.016 0.022
2 159 0.7
1 S32 Fracture of lumbar spine and pelvis 503 2.1 0.062 0.017
2 446 1.9
1 S12.9XXA Fracture of neck, unspecified, initial encounter 60 0.3 0.010 0.024
2 35 0.1
1 S82.11 Fracture of tibial spine 10 0.0 1 <0.001
2 10 0.0
1 G83.4 Cauda equina syndrome 254 1.1 0.078 0.016
2 216 0.9
1 M48.0 Spinal stenosis 16,872 71.7 0.002 0.028
2 16,568 70.4
1 G95.81 Conus medullaris syndrome 10 0.0 1 <0.001
2 10 0.0
1 G95.89 Other specified diseases of spinal cord 258 1.1 0.059 0.017
2 217 0.9
Procedures
Cohort Code Characteristic Patients % of cohort p-value Std. diff.
1 31500 Intubation, endotracheal, emergency procedure 11 0.0 0.827 0.002
2 10 0.0
Medications
Cohort Code   Patients % of cohort p-value Std. diff.
1 11289 Warfarin 233 1.0 0.046 0.018
2 192 0.8
1 1364430 Apixaban 185 0.8 0.958 <0.001
2 186 0.8
1 1114195 Rivaroxaban 120 0.5 0.426 0.007
2 108 0.5
1 1191 Aspirin 3,852 16.4 0.058 0.017
2 3,701 15.7
1 32968 Clopidogrel 290 1.2 0.121 0.014
2 254 1.1
1 3521 Dipyridamole 19 0.1 0.639 0.004
2 22 0.1
1 613391 Prasugrel 13 0.1 0.841 0.002
2 12 0.1

Table 3. Outcomes for cohorts after propensity matching, comparing rates of death, wound infection, dural tear and epidural and/or spinal abscess.

Outcome Cohort No. of patients Patients with the outcome Percentage of cohort Risk difference 95% CI p-value
Deceased 1 23,539 126 0.535 0.000 -0.001 to 0.002 0.563
2 23,539 217 0.497
Wound infection 1 22,276 350 1.571 -0.001 -0.003 to 0.002 0.609
2 22,428 366 1.632
Dural tear 1 22,945 92 0.401 0.001 0.0 to 0.002 0.103
2 22,880 71 0.310
Epidural and/or spinal abscess 1 23,539 115 0.489 -0.003 -0.005 to -0.002 0.000
2 23,539 189 0.803

The risk of mortality in the six months after spinal surgery was not statistically significantly different between the cohorts, with 126 of 23,539 (0.535%) patients in the ESI before the spinal procedure group (cohort 1) and 217 of 23,539 (0.497%) patients in the non-ESI cohort dying in the six months after spinal surgery.

The risk of experiencing a wound infection in the six months after surgery was not statistically significantly different between the cohorts; 350 of 22,276 (1.571%) patients in the ESI cohort (cohort 1) and 366 of 22,428 (1.632%) of those who did not receive an ESI prior to surgery (cohort 2) experienced a wound infection in the six months after spinal surgery. The risk difference of having a wound infection was -0.1% (-0.3% to 0.2%, 95% CI; p = 0.609) between the cohorts.

The risk of diagnosing a dural tear in the six months after surgery was not statistically significantly different between the cohorts; 92 of 22,945 (0.401%) patients in the ESI cohort (cohort 1) and 71 of 22,880 (0.310%) of those who did not receive an ESI prior to surgery (cohort 2) were diagnosed with a dural tear in the six months after spinal surgery. The risk difference of a dural tear was 0.1% (0.0% to 0.2%, 95% CI; p = 0.103) between the cohorts.

The risk of experiencing an epidural and/or spinal abscess in the six months after surgery was statistically significantly different between the cohorts; 115 of 23,539 (0.489%) patients in the ESI cohort (cohort 1) and 189 of 23,539 (0.803%) of those who did not receive ESI prior to surgery (cohort 2) experienced an epidural and/or spinal abscess in the six months after spinal surgery. The risk difference of having an epidural or spinal abscess was -0.3% (-0.5% to -0.2%, 95% CI; p = 0.000) between the cohorts.

Discussion

Several studies have looked at specific surgical outcomes in patients previously treated with ESIs. These studies have generated conflicting evidence. For instance, two studies, one a retrospective Medicare analysis and the other a large insurance database retrospective cohort analysis demonstrated that an ESI in the preceding months of surgery was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of postoperative infection for single-level primary lumbar decompression without fusion. However, the risk of infection was still less than 2% in the ESI group [12-13]. However, an analysis of patients in the Military Health System undergoing single-level lumbar decompression found no difference in postoperative infection rates between those who had recently had an ESI and those who had not [14]. Another national insurance database retrospective study found that an ESI in the three months before lumbar fusion surgery significantly increased the risk of postoperative infection [15]. 

Many previous studies have been specific about the procedural site and indication [12-15]. To interrogate the relationship more robustly between ESIs and post-surgical outcomes, the present study expanded the scope of post-surgical outcomes for patients receiving an ESI and broadened the surgeries included. The present findings suggest no mortality benefit nor was there a decreased likelihood of a dural tear or wound infection. The present study did find a statistically significant decrease in the likelihood epidural/spinal abscess in the three months after spinal surgery for patients who received ESIs in the six months prior to surgery. This data suggests that epidural steroid injections' anti-inflammatory effects provide benefits, and likely no harm, before surgery beyond symptomatic relief. Given that degeneration of anatomic spinal pathologies is potentially advanced rather than corrected by the body's inflammatory response [16], it is likely that preventing hyperactivation of the body's immune system in the months preceding surgical intervention, a traumatic insult, is protective compared to no intervention. However, the timing of such an effect is difficult to assess; recent scholarship has demonstrated that spinal cord injury itself results in an eventual immunodeficiency mediated by autonomic dysregulation [17-18] while inflammation has also been indicated as one of the most important factors responsible for herniation regression [19].

The present study is not without limitations. The major limitation of this study is that it is retrospective. Additionally, the present study did not control for the severity of pathology or functional status before surgery; the authors hope that with cohorts greater than 20,000 each, the functional status and severity of pathology would be balanced; however, it is possible that many of those in cohort 2, those who did not receive an ESI prior to surgery, presented more acutely and thus may have bypassed the ESI prior to surgical intervention. Additionally, certain surgical interventions and spinal levels necessitate riskier approaches with longer procedures, introducing a bias towards increased complications in these patients. This study grouped several spinal surgery procedures to increase the power. However, the nuance of the pathophysiology belying the various reasons for spinal cord or vertebral disease necessitates more specific considerations. As an example, intervertebral disc degeneration is strongly associated with a pro-inflammatory state [20-22] and is likely to benefit from an ESI because degeneration results in permanent loss; on the other hand, the inflammation associated with an injury-related disc herniation often provides restorative benefits, as has been demonstrated in the spontaneous regression of certain lumbar disc herniations [19], and is thus less likely to benefit from an ESI.

Conclusions

This study sought to interrogate the utility of epidural steroid injections in the treatment of patients undergoing spinal surgery by comparing the incidence of post-surgical mortality and morbidity in the three months after spinal surgery between patients who received an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery and those who did not receive an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery. The present results indicate that an ESI did not provide any effect on mortality, wound infection or dural injury; however, an ESI in the six months prior to spinal surgery was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the likelihood of epidural/spinal abscess in the three months after surgery.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Low back pain: an intermittent and remittent predicament of life. Hadler NM, Carey TS. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57:1–2. doi: 10.1136/ard.57.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Patel K, Chopra P, Upadhyayula S. StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Epidural steroid injections. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Injection therapy for subacute and chronic low back pain: an updated Cochrane review. Staal JB, de Bie RA, de Vet HC, Hildebrandt J, Nelemans P. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:49–59. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181909558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Efficacy of steroid and nonsteroid caudal epidural injections for low back pain and sciatica: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Sayegh FE, Kenanidis EI, Papavasiliou KA, Potoupnis ME, Kirkos JM, Kapetanos GA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1441–1447. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a4804a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Epidural steroid injection versus conservative treatment for patients with lumbosacral radicular pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Yang S, Kim W, Kong HH, Do KH, Choi KH. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.The volume of the caudal space and sacral canal in human sacrum. Asghar A, Naaz S. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:2659–2660. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/6287.3724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Transforaminal versus lateral parasagittal versus midline interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injection for management of unilateral radicular lumbar pain: a randomized double-blind trial. Makkar JK, Gourav KK, Jain K, Singh PM, Dhatt SS, Sachdeva N, Bhadada S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31775403/ Pain Physician. 2019;22:561–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Surgical site infections following spine surgery: eliminating the controversies in the diagnosis. Chahoud J, Kanafani Z, Kanj SS. Front Med (Lausanne) 2014;1:7. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2014.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Preoperative epidural steroid injections are not associated with increased rates of infection and dural tear in lumbar spine surgery. Koltsov JC, Smuck MW, Alamin TF, Wood KB, Cheng I, Hu SS. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:870–877. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06566-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Epidural steroid compared to placebo injection in sciatica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Verheijen EJ, Bonke CA, Amorij EM, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:3255–3264. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06854-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Epidural steroid injections for pain management. [ Jun; 2023 ]. 2023. https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/lcd.aspx?LCDId=36920 pp. 3–2023.https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/lcd.aspx?LCDId=36920
  • 12.An epidural steroid injection in the 6 months preceding a lumbar decompression without fusion predisposes patients to post-operative infections. Donnally CJ III, Rush AJ III, Rivera S, Vakharia RM, Vakharia AM, Massel DH, Eismont FJ. J Spine Surg. 2018;4:529–533. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.09.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Preoperative epidural injections are associated with increased risk of infection after single-level lumbar decompression. Yang S, Werner BC, Cancienne JM, Hassanzadeh H, Shimer AL, Shen FH, Singla A. Spine J. 2016;16:191–196. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.The effect of preoperative lumbar epidural corticosteroid injection on postoperative infection rate in patients undergoing single-level lumbar decompression. Seavey JG, Balazs GC, Steelman T, Helgeson M, Gwinn DE, Wagner SC. Spine J. 2017;17:1209–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The impact of preoperative epidural injections on postoperative infection in lumbar fusion surgery. Singla A, Yang S, Werner BC, et al. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26:645–649. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Inflammation after spinal cord injury: a review of the critical timeline of signaling cues and cellular infiltration. Hellenbrand DJ, Quinn CM, Piper ZJ, Morehouse CN, Fixel JA, Hanna AS. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18:284. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02337-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Immune response following traumatic spinal cord injury: pathophysiology and therapies. Sterner RC, Sterner RM. Front Immunol. 2023;13:1084101. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1084101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Peripheral immune dysfunction: a problem of central importance after spinal cord injury. Jeffries MA, Tom VJ. Biology (Basel) 2021;10:928. doi: 10.3390/biology10090928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.The inflammatory response in the regression of lumbar disc herniation. Cunha C, Silva AJ, Pereira P, Vaz R, Gonçalves RM, Barbosa MA. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20:251. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1743-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Painful intervertebral disc degeneration and inflammation: from laboratory evidence to clinical interventions. Lyu FJ, Cui H, Pan H, Mc Cheung K, Cao X, Iatridis JC, Zheng Z. Bone Res. 2021;9:7. doi: 10.1038/s41413-020-00125-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Targeting oxidative stress and inflammation in intervertebral disc degeneration: therapeutic perspectives of phytochemicals. Kang L, Zhang H, Jia C, Zhang R, Shen C. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:956355. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.956355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Influence of anabolic steroid on tibial fracture healing in rabbits - a study on experimental model. Ahmad F, Yunus SM, Asghar A, Faruqi NA. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:93–96. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4863.2679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES