Skip to main content
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle logoLink to Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
. 2023 Sep 5;14(5):2350–2358. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13322

Application of the D3‐creatine muscle mass assessment tool to a geriatric weight loss trial: A pilot study

Kristen M Beavers 1,, Allison E Avery 1, Mahalakshmi Shankaran 2, William J Evans 2, S Delanie Lynch 3, Caitlyn Dwyer 1, Marjorie Howard 4, Daniel P Beavers 5, Ashley A Weaver 3, Leon Lenchik 6, Peggy M Cawthon 7
PMCID: PMC10570063  PMID: 37668075

Abstract

Background

Traditionally, weight loss (WL) trials utilize dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure lean mass. This method assumes lean mass, as the sum of all non‐bone and non‐fat tissue, is a reasonable proxy for muscle mass. In contrast, the D3‐creatine (D3Cr) dilution method directly measures whole body skeletal muscle mass, although this method has yet to be applied in the context of a geriatric WL trial. The purpose of this project was to (1) describe estimates of change and variability in D3Cr muscle mass in older adults participating in an intentional WL intervention and (2) relate its change to other measures of body composition as well as muscle function and strength.

Methods

The INVEST in Bone Health trial (NCT04076618), used as a scaffold for this ancillary pilot project, is a three‐armed, 12‐month randomized, controlled trial designed to determine the effects of resistance training or weighted vest use during intentional WL on a battery of musculoskeletal health outcomes among 150 older adults living with obesity. A convenience sample of 24 participants (n = 8/arm) are included in this analysis. At baseline and 6 months, participants were weighed, ingested a 30 mg D3Cr tracer dose, provided a fasted urine sample 3–6 days post‐dosage, underwent DXA (total body fat and lean masses, appendicular lean mass) and computed tomography (mid‐thigh and trunk muscle/intermuscular fat areas) scans, and performed 400‐m walk, stair climb, knee extensor strength, and grip strength tests.

Results

Participants were older (68.0 ± 4.4 years), mostly White (75.0%), predominantly female (66.7%), and living with obesity (body mass index: 33.8 ± 2.7 kg/m2). Six month total body WL was −10.3 (95% confidence interval, CI: −12.7, −7.9) kg. All DXA and computed tomography‐derived body composition measures were significantly decreased from baseline, yet D3Cr muscle mass did not change [+0.5 (95% CI: −2.0, 3.0) kg]. Of muscle function and strength measures, only grip strength significantly changed [+2.5 (95% CI: 1.0, 4.0) kg] from baseline.

Conclusions

Among 24 older adults, significant WL with or without weighted vest use or resistance training over a 6‐month period was associated with significant declines in all bioimaging metrics, while D3Cr muscle mass and muscle function and strength were preserved. Treatment assignment for the trial remains blinded; therefore, full interpretation of these findings is limited. Future work in this area will assess change in D3Cr muscle mass by parent trial treatment group assignment in all study participants.

Keywords: Aging, Deuterated creatine (D3Cr) dilution, Muscle mass, Sarcopenia, Weight loss

Introduction

The number of older adults living with obesity has steadily increased over the past four decades, with recent estimates indicating over 40% of adults aged 60 and older currently live with the condition. 1 The negative impact of obesity on health, independence, and quality of life in older adults is well described 2 ; as is the ability of lifestyle‐based weight loss (WL) interventions to mitigate adiposity‐related illness in this population. 3 That said, clinical WL recommendation remains controversial for older adults, 4 , 5 due (in part) to concomitant loss of fat free mass and its potential to accelerate age‐related functional decline. Paradoxically, randomized controlled trial data often show improvements in strength, physical performance, and mobility among older adults following intentional WL. 6 , 7 , 8 These observations may result from changes in complementary aspects of physical function (including augmented neural 9 and mitochondrial activity, 10 as well as reduced fat infiltration 11 ); however, they may also reflect the indirect and imprecise methods conventionally used to measure muscle.

Historically, WL trials have often relied on dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) to approximate muscle mass. 12 , 13 However, DXA does not directly measure muscle mass, but rather provides an estimate of whole‐body lean mass—including connective tissue, skin, and organs, in addition to muscle mass. 14 In contrast, the D3‐creatine (D3Cr) dilution method takes advantage of known principles of creatine biology to directly measure whole body skeletal muscle mass via stable isotope tracer technology. 15 , 16 , 17 Whole body D3Cr muscle mass has been shown to closely align with validated methods of measuring muscle volume, such as whole body magnetic resonance imaging (r = 0.87; P < 0.01), 18 and importantly, measures a muscle parameter (i.e., the creatine pool), which is associated with skeletal muscle function. 19 Indeed, an emerging body of observational data show significant associations between D3Cr muscle mass—but not DXA‐acquired lean mass—and strength, physical performance, and mobility in older adults. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23

A salient application of the D3Cr dilution method is in the context of geriatric weight management, where better understanding of the degree of muscle loss with WL would help inform clinical guidelines, 24 , 25 while also offering a model of robust weight change in a relatively short period of time. The INVEST in Bone Health trial (NCT04076618) 26 provides an ideal parent study to examine and interpret WL‐related changes in D3Cr muscle mass, as all participants in this study are following a similar dietary prescription (i.e., a higher protein, nutritionally complete, hypocaloric meal plan, designed to elicit 8–10% WL loss over a 6‐month period 6 ). Additionally, this study is acquiring a battery of longitudinal muscle‐related outcomes, including bioimaging metrics obtained with DXA and computed tomography (CT) along with clinically meaningful muscle function and strength outcomes (400‐m walk, stair climb, knee extensor strength, and grip strength). Therefore, the purpose of this ancillary pilot project is to describe estimates of change and variability in D3Cr muscle mass in older adults participating in an intentional WL intervention, and relate its change to other measures of body composition as well as muscle function and strength to inform future work in this area.

Methods

Overview of INVEST in bone health trial

The purpose of the Incorporating Nutrition, Vests, Education, and Strength Training (INVEST) in Bone Health Trial is to evaluate the effects of WL with or without weighted vest use or resistance training (RT) on factors of bone health and risk of fracture in 150 older adults who are living with obesity or overweight. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04076618), was approved by the Wake Forest School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 00058279), and was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Prior to completing any data collection, all participants provided written informed consent and completed a HIPAA authorization form. Full methodologic details can be found in the published design paper. 26 Briefly, the INVEST in Bone Health trial utilizes a three‐arm randomized design in which one arm receives a higher protein, nutritionally complete, hypocaloric meal plan 6 targeting 8–10% WL over a 12‐month period (WL only; n = 50); a second arm receives the same dietary WL intervention and is also asked to wear a weighted vest 8 h/day with weight replacement in the vest titrated up to 10% of an individual's lost weight (WL + VEST; n = 50); and a third arm receives the same dietary WL intervention and is also asked to participate in a structured RT programme 3 days/week consisting of three sets of 10–12 repetitions for eight different exercises at 70–75% 1 repetition maximum (WL + RT; n = 50). A convenience sample of 24 participants (n = 8/arm) with complete baseline and 6‐month D3Cr, DXA, CT, 400‐m walk, stair climb, and grip strength data ascertained by 12 May 2022 was included in this ancillary pilot study, with n = 20 also presenting with completed knee extension strength data. Details relevant to the collection of exposure, outcome, and covariate measures are described below.

D3‐creatine whole body muscle mass

As previously described, 27 participants were instructed to ingest a 30 mg oral dose of deuterated creatine and provide a fasted urine sample (but not the first morning void) 3 to 6 days post‐dose. This dosing/sampling time course allows for isotopic steady‐state of urinary D3‐creatinine (D3Cr) enrichment to be achieved. 18 Urine samples were frozen at −70°C and stored locally at the Wake Forest School of Medicine Biogerontology specimen repository until shipment to UC Berkeley on dry ice for batched analysis. Using stored urine samples, D3Cr enrichment, as well as concentrations of unlabelled creatine and creatinine, were measured via liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy in accordance with previously published methodology. 14 Once obtained, the amount of D3Cr estimated to have been excreted (mg) and mean steady state D3Cr enrichment ratio was input into a published algorithm to determine total body creatine pool size. 27 Whole body muscle mass was then estimated by dividing the creatine pool size by 4.3 g/kg (which represents the average concentration of creatine in whole wet muscle).

Weight and dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry‐acquired body composition metrics

Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated and certified balance beam scale (Tanita #WB‐3000PLUS). Total body fat mass, total body lean mass, and appendicular lean mass were obtained from whole‐body DXA scans using a GE iDXA (Medical Systems, Madison WI). Coefficients of variation from repeated scans at our institution are 1.3% for total body fat mass and 0.9% for total body lean mass. When appropriate (i.e., based on participant body size), a mirroring technique was applied to estimate mass scanned outside of the measuring field. 28 Daily quality control scans were performed with the manufacturer provided calibration phantom, and all DXA scans were completed and assessed by trained and blinded technicians.

Computed tomography‐acquired body composition metrics

Participant CT scans were acquired by trained and blinded technicians using a 64‐slice PET/CT GE Discovery (Medical Systems, Madison WI) scanner. The CT scan field of view extended from top of the first lumbar vertebrae through three centimetres below the mid‐shaft of both femurs, and two 2‐D scouts were acquired to capture the entire femoral length. Using the microdicom browser, the anterior–posterior 2‐D scout was visualized and the entire femoral length was measured as the distance between the superior aspect of the greater trochanter and the inferior aspect of the lateral condyle. The midpoint of this length was used to identify a single CT slice corresponding to the mid‐thigh region. Muscle and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) were semi‐automatically segmented from the dominant leg to derive cross‐sectional area from this single CT slice using Mimics software (v23, Materialize, Leuven, Belgium) with standard thresholds of −29 to 150 Hounsfield Units (HU) and −190 and −30 HU for muscle and IMAT, respectively. Additionally, a single CT slice was selected from the middle of the third lumbar vertebrae (L3; half of the vertebral body height), and the same thresholds were used to segment muscle and IMAT cross‐sectional area of the trunk using automatic methods in the Data Analysis Facilitation Suite (DAFS v3.7.1.) by Voroni Health Analytics, Inc. 29 All thresholding operations for both the mid‐thigh and trunk regions were followed by manual tracing to ensure accuracy and exclude visceral content, skin, and bone, as done previously. 30

Muscle function and strength assessments

To assess muscle function, a fast 400‐m walk test (consisting of 10 laps on a 40‐m course (20‐m down and back) was performed, as described previously. 31 To assess stair climb time, the fastest time a participant climbed 12 steps was recorded. Likewise, to assess muscular strength, grip strength dynamometry was measured in both hands using a Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer (Performance Health, Warrenville, IL), with the mean value from the two trials (unless an excess of 4 kg was observed between trials, in which case a third trial was completed) in the dominant hand was included for analysis. 32 Finally, knee extensor strength (in peak torque; Nm) was assessed via isokinetic dynamometry (Biodex, Shirley, NY) in the dominant leg at 60 degrees per second.

Covariate assessments

Self‐reported demographic information (i.e., age, sex, and race/ethnicity) were assessed at baseline. Standing height without shoes was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as dividing weight in kg by height in m2. Finally, the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors 33 physical activity questionnaire was administered to assess levels of caloric expenditure per week.

Statistical analyses

Baseline characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and presented as means and standard deviations (mean ± SD) or counts and percentages [n (%)]. Baseline and 6‐month body weight, D3Cr muscle mass, DXA/CT‐acquired body composition, and muscle function/strength measures are presented as mean ± SD, with unadjusted 6‐month change values presented as means and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) obtained from paired t‐tests. Per cent change over 6 months is also presented as means and 95% CIs, obtained from one‐sample t‐tests. Partial Pearson correlations (r), adjusted for age and sex, were used to determine associations between change in D3Cr muscle mass and change in body weight, DXA/CT‐acquired body composition, and muscle function/strength variables. Partial Pearson's correlations, stratified by sex, were also conducted to examine potential sex differences in the relationship between change in D3Cr muscle mass and DXA‐acquired body composition measures. Linear regression models were used to confirm the presence of any interaction, and scatterplots were further presented to aid in visualization of potential sex differences. Analyses were performed using SAS v. 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC) and R software, with P‐values of 0.05 used to determine statistical significance.

Results

Baseline sample characteristics

Baseline characteristics of the convenience sample (n = 24) of participants included in this ancillary pilot project are summarized in Table 1. Overall, average age of the study sample was 68.0 ± 4.4 years, and the majority of participants were non‐Hispanic, Caucasian/White, women (67% female, 75% Caucasian, 96% non‐Hispanic/Latino). BMI was 33.8 ± 2.7 kg/m2, and self‐reported physical activity expenditure was 2805 ± 2022 calories per week, indicative of a moderately active sample, living with class 1 obesity.

Table 1.

Baseline descriptive characteristics of study sample (n = 24)

N (%) or mean ± SD
Age, years 68.0 ± 4.4
Female 16 (66.7)
Race
Caucasian/White 18 (75.0)
African American/Black 6 (25.0)
Ethnicity
Hispanic/Latino 1 (4.2)
Non‐Hispanic/Latino 23 (95.8)
Body mass (kg) 95.2 ± 11.1
Body mass index (kg/m2) 33.8 ± 2.7
Physical activity (caloric expenditure/week) 2805.3 ± 2022.1

Six month changes in body weight, composition, and muscle function and strength measures

Baseline and 6‐month unadjusted values of total body weight (mass), body composition, and muscle strength and function are presented in Table 2. Total body weight was significantly reduced in all participants by −10.3 (95% CI: −12.7, −7.9) kg, with the majority of lost weight coming from fat mass [−8.4 (95% CI: −10.5, −6.3) kg]. Likewise, DXA‐acquired total body lean mass [−0.7 (95% CI: −1.2, −0.1) kg] and appendicular lean mass [−0.9 (95% CI): −1.4, −0.4) kg] decreased significantly (though modestly); however, whole body muscle mass, as measured via the D3Cr dilution method, did not significantly change [+0.5 (95% CI: −2.0, 3.0) kg]. CT‐acquired muscle and IMAT areas obtained from the mid‐thigh [muscle: −6.8 (−9.4, −4.3) cm2; IMAT: −1.9 (−3.4, −0.5) cm2] and trunk [muscle: −6.1 (−8.5, −3.6) cm2; IMAT: −1.2 (−2.1, −0.2) cm2] declined significantly from baseline; and, of muscle function and strength measures, only grip strength significantly changed (notably, increased) from baseline [+2.5 (95% CI: 1.0, 4.0) kg].

Table 2.

Baseline and 6‐month unadjusted values of relevant body weight, composition and muscle function/strength variables

Baseline (mean ± SD) 6‐month (mean ± SD) 6‐month ∆ (95% CI) 6‐month % ∆ (95% CI)
Total body weight (kg) 95.2 ± 11.1 84.9 ± 10.6 −10.3 (−12.7, −7.9)* −10.7 (−13.1, −8.3)*
D3Cr muscle mass (kg) 25.7 ± 8.3 26.2 ± 7.2 +0.5 (−2.0, 3.0) 6.1 (−6.9, 19.1)
DXA‐acquired body composition
Total body fat mass (kg) 41.7 ± 5.6 33.4 ± 8.1 −8.4 (−10.5, −6.3)* −20.7 (−26.2, −15.2)*
Lean body mass (kg) 49.0 ± 10.0 48.3 ± 10.7 −0.7 (−1.2, −0.1)* −1.6 (−2.7, −0.5)*
Appendicular lean mass (kg) 23.3 ± 5.6 22.4 ± 5.5 −0.9 (−1.4, −0.4)* −3.7 (−6.3, −1.1)*
CT‐acquired body composition
Mid‐thigh muscle area (cm2) 130.2 ± 29.9 123.4 ± 26.8 −6.8 (−9.4, −4.3)* −4.9 (−6.6, −3.2)*
Mid‐thigh intermuscular fat area (cm2) 11.8 ± 5.0 9.9 ± 3.4 −1.9 (−3.4, −0.5)* −11.7 (−20.9, −2.6)*
Trunk muscle area (cm2) 130.6 ± 35.4 124.5 ± 31.9 −6.1 (−8.5, −3.6)* −4.2 (−5.8, −2.6)*
trunk Intermuscular fat area (cm2) 17.9 ± 5.9 16.7 ± 6.2 −1.2 (−2.1, −0.2)* −7.2 (−12.8, −1.6)*
Muscle function and strength
Gait speed (m/s) 1.3 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.2 −0.0 (−0.1, 0.0) −1.1 (−4.6, 2.4)
Stair climb (s) 6.5 ± 2.2 6.4 ± 2.1 −0.1 (−0.5, 0.3) −0.1 (−6.1, 6.0)
Knee extension strength (nm) 127.9 ± 40.2 125.4 ± 41.2 −2.5 (−6.4, 1.4) −2.2 (−5.0, 0.6)
Grip strength (kg) 26.5 ± 7.2 29.0 ± 7.3 +2.5 (1.0, 4.0)* 11.2 (4.7, 17.7)*
*

Statistical significance at P < 0.05.

Correlations between change in D3‐creatine muscle mass and change in body weight, body composition, and muscle function and strength

Partial Pearson correlations (adjusted for age and sex) between change in D3Cr muscle mass and change in body weight and DXA and CT composition measures are presented in Table 3. No significant associations were observed between changes in D3Cr muscle mass and changes in total body weight or DXA‐acquired lean body mass or total body fat mass; however, change in D3Cr muscle mass was modestly and directly correlated with change in appendicular lean mass (r = 0.46; P = 0.03). These data are displayed graphically by sex in Figure 1, with stronger correlations observed in women than men for both change in D3Cr muscle mass and change in total body lean mass (women r = 0.35; men r = −0.04) and change in D3Cr muscle mass and change in appendicular lean mass (women r = 0.65; men r = 0.13). That said, the interaction term for sex was non‐significant; however, few men were included in these analyses (n = 8). No significant correlations were observed between change in D3Cr muscle mass and change in any CT‐acquired body composition variable.

Table 3.

Adjusted correlations (for age and sex), between 6‐month change in D3Cr muscle mass and changes in body weight and composition

Δ D3Cr muscle mass (kg)
Body weight and composition r P
Δ Total body weight (kg) 0.29 0.19
DXA‐acquired body composition
Δ Total body fat mass (kg) 0.27 0.22
Δ Lean body mass (kg) 0.15 0.50
Δ Appendicular lean mass (kg) 0.46 0.03*
CT‐acquired body composition
Δ Mid‐thigh muscle area (cm2) 0.16 0.46
Δ Mid‐thigh intermuscular fat area (cm2) 0.18 0.42
Δ Trunk muscle area (cm2) 0.17 0.45
Δ Trunk intermuscular fat area (cm2) −0.14 0.55
*

Denotes statistical significance P < 0.05.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Scatterplots of 6‐month change in D3Cr muscle mass and change DXA‐acquired measures of body composition by sex.

Table 4 presents partial Pearson correlations (adjusted for age and sex) between change in all body weight and composition metrics with change in muscle function and strength. Only one significant association was observed between change in body composition and change in muscle function, with change in CT‐derived IMAT fat area for the trunk inversely associated with gait speed (r = −0.44; P = 0.04). No significant associations were observed between any D3Cr‐, DXA‐ or CT‐acquired muscle metric and muscle function or strength.

Table 4.

Adjusted correlations (for age and sex), between 6‐month change in D3Cr muscle mass and body weight and composition measures with change in muscle function and strength

Δ Gait speed (m/s) Δ Stair climb (s) Δ Knee extension strength (nm) Δ Grip strength (kg)
r P r P r P r P
Δ Total body mass (kg) −0.18 0.43 −0.06 0.78 0.46 0.05 −0.01 0.96
Δ D3Cr muscle mass (kg) 0.15 0.50 −0.25 0.26 0.35 0.16 0.19 0.39
DXA‐acquired body composition
Δ Total body fat mass (kg) −0.27 0.23 −0.12 0.60 0.34 0.17 −0.03 0.89
Δ Lean body mass (kg) −0.15 0.52 0.40 0.07 0.39 0.11 0.21 0.36
Δ Appendicular lean mass (kg) −0.26 0.25 0.24 0.27 0.42 0.09 0.12 0.58
CT‐acquired body composition
Δ Mid‐thigh muscle area (cm2) 0.16 0.48 −0.19 0.40 0.27 0.29 −0.01 0.96
Δ Mid‐thigh intermuscular fat area (cm2) −0.28 0.20 0.06 0.79 0.16 0.52 −0.39 0.07
Δ Trunk muscle area (cm2) −0.1 0.66 0.11 0.63 0.41 0.09 0.09 0.68
Δ Trunk intermuscular fat area (cm2) −0.44 0.04* 0.13 0.56 −0.22 0.39 −0.34 0.13
*

Denotes statistical significance P < 0.05.

Discussion

The primary objective of this ancillary pilot project was to derive preliminary D3Cr muscle mass estimates of change and variability in an older, largely female sample, participating in an intentional WL intervention with or without weighted vest use or RT. Secondarily, we sought to explore associations between change in D3Cr muscle mass with WL‐related changes in more traditional sarcopenia metrics—including bioimaging (DXA/CT‐acquired body composition) and functional (including mobility and strength) measures. Herein, we report that ~11% loss of total body weight was accompanied by a ~1.5% reduction in DXA‐acquired total body lean mass (coming predominantly from the appendicular region) and a ~4–5% loss in muscle area at the mid‐thigh and trunk. However, whole body muscle mass as measured by the D3Cr dilution method was preserved, as were measures of muscle function and strength. Change in D3Cr muscle mass was moderately correlated with changes in DXA‐acquired appendicular lean mass (r = 0.46), a finding which may be more evident in women than men. Finally, we did not observe significant associations between change in muscle mass, lean body mass, or muscle area (D3Cr, DXA, and CT, respectively) and muscle function or strength. Collectively, results support the notion that prior literature, which reports discrepant findings between change in lean mass or regional changes in muscle area and function, may be driven by lack of an accurate measurement of muscle mass itself.

The baseline amount of D3Cr muscle mass reported in our sample (25.7 ± 8.3 kg) is similar to DXA appendicular lean mass (23.3 ± 5.6 kg)—half of what is estimated with DXA total body lean mass (49.0 ± 10.0 kg) and approximately one quarter of total body mass, similar to what has been previously reported among older adults. 20 , 23 It is notable that the point estimate of change in D3Cr muscle mass we observed was positive [+0.5 (−2.0, 3.0) kg], which is in contrast to both total body lean mass and appendicular lean mass estimates that were of equal magnitude, but in a negative direction. Discordant intervention‐related changes in DXA lean mass and D3Cr muscle mass were likewise reported in a RCT examining the effects of a hypocaloric diet and testosterone supplementation in young men. 34 Although stable or increasing muscle mass in older adults experiencing >10% WL would generally be unexpected, because of the higher protein nature of our dietary prescription (which all participants received) and the fact that two‐thirds of our sample was also engaged in some type of exercise programme (i.e., weighted vest use or structured RT), concomitant uptake of these anabolic stimuli may help to explain our findings. Indeed, a recent publication by Balachandran et al. demonstrated that the D3Cr dilution method was sufficiently sensitive to detect increases in muscle mass due to resistance exercise training in frail older men and women. 35 As additional intervention studies utilizing the D3Cr method are published, comparison of our findings—particularly once the blinding is lifted for the parent INVEST in Bone Health trial—to an emerging of body literature will be of significant interest to the sarcopenia research community.

Our findings compliment and extend prior work reporting moderate longitudinal correlations between D3Cr muscle mass and DXA‐acquired lean mass. Specifically, in a convenience sample (n = 40) of older men from the MrOS cohort who were followed for 1.6 years, Duchowny et al. reported correlations of 0.50 and 0.58 between changes in D3Cr muscle mass and total body lean and appendicular lean mass, respectively. 21 Our observed correlations between change in D3Cr muscle mass and DXA‐acquired appendicular lean mass are in alignment; however, we did not observe a significant correlation with DXA‐acquired total body lean mass. Although reasons for this discrepancy are not readily apparent, it may be due to potential error introduced as muscle mass is only about 50% of DXA lean mass (in older men 36 ) with the remainder of lean mass consisting of body water and organ weights, which would more heavily influence total body lean mass, as compared with appendicular lean mass, measurement.

At the present time, only one other study has examined associations between D3Cr muscle mass and CT‐acquired measures of muscle. 37 Using data from over 1000 MrOS participants, Orwoll and colleagues examined associations between quartiles of high resolution peripheral CT (HRpQCT)‐acquired muscle density at the tibia and D3Cr muscle mass. Authors report that higher levels of tibial muscle density (Q4: 16.9 ± 1.3 mg/cm3 vs. Q1: 5.8 ± 3.5 mg/cm3) are associated with a higher amount of whole body D3Cr muscle mass (Q4: 25.3 ± 3.5 kg vs. Q1: 22.5 ± 3.7 kg); however, measures were not found to be strongly correlated (r = −0.12). Unfortunately, as our study acquired axial CT scans, results are not directly comparable; however, it is notable that we also failed to observe significant correlations between change in D3Cr muscle mass and change in CT‐acquired muscle cross‐sectional area at the mid‐thigh and trunk. That said, given our small sample, this ancillary pilot study lacked power to detect all but the strongest correlations.

As noted previously, there is currently a dearth of D3Cr dilution method data in women. This gap is particularly notable, given the well‐described sex differences in body composition, 38 age‐related functional decline, 39 and responsivity to WL. 40 While data presented in Figure 1 are certainly meant to be descriptive, it is interesting that associations between change in lean mass and muscle mass are seemingly more apparent in women than men. To date, only one other study applied the D3Cr method to measure muscle mass in postmenopausal women and reported comparisons to DXA‐acquired body composition and physical function measures, with similar associations reported between D3Cr muscle mass and measures of DXA appendicular lean mass (r = 0.50 in Zhu et al. 23 vs. r = 0.46 observed in the present study).

In contrast to our hypothesis, and prior work reporting significant associations between D3Cr muscle mass and muscle function 20 , 22 and strength, 37 we did not observe a significant association between change in D3Cr muscle mass—or any bioimaging (DXA/CT) muscle metric—and muscle function or strength. Conversely, the lone significant association observed between change in body composition and change in muscle function was a modest (r = −0.44) inverse association between regional fat and gait speed, which has been shown before. 11 We speculate that our largely null findings may be attributed to the modest changes in muscle function and strength we observed in our very small, relatively well functioning sample. As interpretation of body composition changes—particularly in the context of geriatric WL—are of greatest clinical relevance when paired with changes in functional outcomes, further work in this area is warranted.

This ancillary pilot study has several strengths worth noting, including novel application of the D3Cr dilution method in the context of a predominantly female, geriatric WL intervention. Additionally, utilizing the INVEST in Bone Health trial as a scaffold, we were able to compare the change in D3Cr muscle mass to a battery of body composition and muscle function and strength metrics. Despite these strengths, however, our study is limited by its small, convenient sample, and findings are certainly not definitive. Moreover, it should be acknowledged that the equation used to estimate D3Cr whole body muscle mass utilizes a constant, which may over or underestimate the actual concentration of creatine in whole wet muscle for any given individual. 27 Finally, as treatment assignment for the trial is blinded at this time, the impact of group intervention remains unknown and will be the focus of future work.

In sum, the primary objective of this pilot project was to generate estimates of change and variability in whole body muscle mass, as derived from the D3Cr dilution method, in a predominately female sample undergoing intentional WL with and without weighted vest use or RT. We report that significant, clinically meaningful, loss in total body weight (11% of baseline weight) was accompanied by significant loss in several DXA and CT‐derived body composition measures, yet preservation of D3Cr muscle mass and muscle function. As the D3Cr method is relatively new, our results add information from a mostly female sample and in the context of an intentional WL intervention, with and without exercise. Results from this project, and others, support the continued consideration of the D3Cr dilution method as a scalable body composition assessment method.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging [Grants R01 AG059186 (KMB); K25 AG058804 (AAW), T32 AG033534, and P30 AG21332]. Jason Pharmaceuticals, a wholly owned subsidiary of Medifast, Inc. made an in‐kind product donation for the meal replacements used in this study. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge use of the services and facilities of the Clinical Research Unit and Translational Imaging Program, funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UL1TR001420.

Conflict of interest

Drs. Evans holds two relevant patents related to the D3Cr method and is the CEO of MyoCorps, Inc. Drs. Evans, Cawthon, and Shankaran hold stock or stock options in this company. All other authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest. Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All authors certify that they comply with the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle.

Beavers K. M., Avery A. E., Shankaran M., Evans W. J., Lynch S. D., Dwyer C., et al (2023) Application of the D3‐creatine muscle mass assessment tool to a geriatric weight loss trial: A pilot study, Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 14, 2350–2358, 10.1002/jcsm.13322

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04076618

References

  • 1. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and severe obesity among adults: United States, 2017‐2018. NCHS Data Brief 2020;1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Batsis JA, Zagaria AB. Addressing obesity in aging patients. Med Clin North Am 2018;102:65–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Batsis JA, Gill LE, Masutani RK, Adachi‐Mejia AM, Blunt HB, Bagley PJ, et al. Weight loss interventions in older adults with obesity: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials since 2005. J Am Geriatr Soc 2017;65:257–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Locher JL, Goldsby TU, Goss AM, Kilgore ML, Gower B, Ard JD. Calorie restriction in overweight older adults: do benefits exceed potential risks? Exp Gerontol 2016;86:4–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Papageorgiou M, Kerschan‐Schindl K, Sathyapalan T, Pietschmann P. Is weight loss harmful for skeletal health in obese older adults? Gerontology 2020;66:2–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Beavers KM, Nesbit BA, Kiel JR, Sheedy JL, Arterburn LM, Collins AE, et al. Effect of an energy‐restricted, nutritionally complete, higher protein meal plan on body composition and mobility in older adults with obesity: a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2019;74:929–935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rejeski WJ, Ambrosius WT, Burdette JH, Walkup MP, Marsh AP. Community weight loss to combat obesity and disability in at‐risk older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017;72:1547–1553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Villareal DT, Chode S, Parimi N, Sinacore DR, Hilton T, Armamento‐Villareal R, et al. Weight loss, exercise, or both and physical function in obese older adults. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1218–1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Clark DJ, Fielding RA. Neuromuscular contributions to age‐related weakness. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012;67:41–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Trevino MB, Zhang X, Standley RA, Wang M, Han X, Reis FCG, et al. Loss of mitochondrial energetics is associated with poor recovery of muscle function but not mass following disuse atrophy. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2019;317:e899–e910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Beavers KM, Beavers DP, Houston DK, Harris TB, Hue TF, Koster A, et al. Associations between body composition and gait‐speed decline: results from The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:552–560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chaston TB, Dixon JB, O'Brien PE. Changes in fat‐free mass during significant weight loss: a systematic review. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:743–750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Miller CT, Fraser SF, Levinger I, Straznicky NE, Dixon JB, Reynolds J, et al. The effects of exercise training in addition to energy restriction on functional capacities and body composition in obese adults during weight loss: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e81692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Evans WJ, Hellerstein M, Orwoll E, Cummings S, Cawthon PM. D(3) ‐Creatine dilution and the importance of accuracy in the assessment of skeletal muscle mass. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2019;10:14–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Clark RV, Walker AC, O'Connor‐Semmes RL, Leonard MS, Miller RR, Stimpson SA, et al. Total body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by creatine (methyl‐D3) dilution in humans. J Appl Physiol 1985;2014:1605–1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Stimpson SA, Leonard MS, Clifton LG, Poole JC, Turner SM, Shearer TW, et al. Longitudinal changes in total body creatine pool size and skeletal muscle mass using the D3‐creatine dilution method. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2013;4:217–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Stimpson SA, Turner SM, Clifton LG, Poole JC, Mohammed HA, Shearer TW, et al. Total‐body creatine pool size and skeletal muscle mass determination by creatine‐(methyl‐D3) dilution in rats. J Appl Physiol 1985;2012:1940–1948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Clark RV, Walker AC, Miller RR, O'Connor‐Semmes RL, Ravussin E, Cefalu WT. Creatine (methyl‐d(3)) dilution in urine for estimation of total body skeletal muscle mass: accuracy and variability vs. MRI and DXA. J Appl Physiol 1985;2018:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hill DK. The location of creatine phosphate in frog's striated muscle. J Physiol 1962;164:31–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cawthon PM, Blackwell T, Cummings SR, Orwoll ES, Duchowny KA, Kado DM, et al. Muscle mass assessed by the D3‐creatine dilution method and incident self‐reported disability and mortality in a prospective observational study of community‐dwelling older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021;76:123–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Duchowny KA, Peters KE, Cummings SR, Orwoll ES, Hoffman AR, Ensrud KE, et al. Association of change in muscle mass assessed by D3‐creatine dilution with changes in grip strength and walking speed. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2020;11:55–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Cawthon PM, Orwoll ES, Peters KE, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Kado DM, et al. Strong relation between muscle mass determined by D3‐creatine dilution, physical performance, and incidence of falls and mobility limitations in a prospective cohort of older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2019;74:844–852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhu K, Wactawski‐Wende J, Ochs‐Balcom HM, LaMonte MJ, Hovey KM, Evans W, et al. The association of muscle mass measured by D3‐creatine dilution method with dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry and physical function in postmenopausal women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2021;76:1591–1599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Villareal DT, Apovian CM, Kushner RF, Klein S, American Society for N, Naaso TOS . Obesity in older adults: technical review and position statement of the American Society for Nutrition and NAASO, The Obesity Society. Obes Res 2005;13:1849–1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society. Circulation 2014;129:S102–S138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Miller RM, Beavers DP, Cawthon PM, Crotts C, Fanning J, Gerosa J, et al. Incorporating Nutrition, Vests, Education, and Strength Training (INVEST) in Bone Health: trial design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials 2021;104:106326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Shankaran M, Czerwieniec G, Fessler C, Wong PA, Killion S, Turner SM, et al. Dilution of oral D3‐creatine to measure creatine pool size and estimate skeletal muscle mass: development of a correction algorithm. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018;9:540–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rothney MP, Brychta RJ, Schaefer EV, Chen KY, Skarulis MC. Body composition measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry half‐body scans in obese adults. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:1281–1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Anyene I, Caan B, Williams GR, Popuri K, Lenchik L, Giri S, et al. Body composition from single versus multi‐slice abdominal computed tomography: concordance and associations with colorectal cancer survival. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2022;13:2974–2984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Madrid DA, Beavers KM, Walkup MP, Ambrosius WT, Rejeski WJ, Marsh AP, et al. Effect of exercise modality and weight loss on changes in muscle and bone quality in older adults with obesity. Exp Gerontol 2023;174:112126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Simonsick EM, Montgomery PS, Newman AB, Bauer DC, Harris T. Measuring fitness in healthy older adults: the Health ABC Long Distance Corridor Walk. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:1544–1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Huang L, Liu Y, Lin T, Hou L, Song Q, Ge N, et al. Reliability and validity of two hand dynamometers when used by community‐dwelling adults aged over 50 years. BMC Geriatr 2022;22:580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:1126–1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Howard EE, Shankaran M, Evans WJ, Berryman CE, Margolis LM, Lieberman HR, et al. Effects of testosterone on mixed‐muscle protein synthesis and proteome dynamics during energy deficit. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022;107:e3254–e3263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Balachandran AT, Evans WJ, Cawthon PM, Wang Y, Shankaran M, Hellerstein M, et al. Comparing D3‐creatine dilution and DXA muscle mass responses to strength training in low functioning older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2023;glad047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Orwoll ES, Peters KE, Hellerstein M, Cummings SR, Evans WJ, Cawthon PM. The importance of muscle versus fat mass in sarcopenic obesity: a re‐evaluation using D3‐creatine muscle mass versus DXA lean mass measurements. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2020;75:1362–1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Orwoll ES, Blackwell T, Cummings SR, Cauley JA, Lane NE, Hoffman AR, et al. CT muscle density, D3Cr muscle mass, and body fat associations with physical performance, mobility outcomes, and mortality risk in older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2022;77:790–799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Karastergiou K, Smith SR, Greenberg AS, Fried SK. Sex differences in human adipose tissues ‐ the biology of pear shape. Biol Sex Differ 2012;3:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Courtney‐Long EA, Carroll DD, Zhang QC, Stevens AC, Griffin‐Blake S, Armour BS, et al. Prevalence of disability and disability type among adults–United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2015;64:777–783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Pagoto SL, Schneider KL, Oleski JL, Luciani JM, Bodenlos JS, Whited MC. Male inclusion in randomized controlled trials of lifestyle weight loss interventions. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012;20:1234–1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES