Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Biol Med. 2022 May 15;146:105613. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105613

Significance of Aortoseptal Angle Anomalies to Left Ventricular Hemodynamics and Subaortic Stenosis: A Numerical Study

Jason A Shar 1, Sundeep G Keswani 2, K Jane Grande-Allen 3, Philippe Sucosky 4,*
PMCID: PMC10570849  NIHMSID: NIHMS1933722  PMID: 35751200

Abstract

Purpose:

Discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) is an obstructive cardiac disease caused by a membranous lesion in the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT). Although its etiology is unknown, the higher prevalence of DSS in LVOT anatomies featuring a steep aortoseptal angle (AoSA) suggests a potential role for hemodynamics. Therefore, the objective of this study was to quantify the impact of AoSA steepening on the LV wall three-dimensional (3D) hemodynamic stress environment.

Methods:

A 3D LV model reconstructed from cardiac cine-magnetic resonance imaging was connected to four LVOT geometrical variations spanning the clinical AoSA range (115°-160°). LV hemodynamic stresses were characterized in terms of cycle-averaged pressure, temporal shear magnitude (TSM), and oscillatory shear index. The wall shear stress (WSS) topological skeleton was further analyzed by computing the scaled divergence of the WSS vector field.

Results:

AoSA steepening caused an increasingly perturbed subaortic flow marked by LVOT flow skewness and complex 3D secondary flow patterns. These disturbances generated WSS overloads (> 45% increase in TSM vs. 160° model) on the inferior LVOT wall, and increased WSS contraction (> 66% decrease in WSS divergence vs. 160° model) in regions prone to DSS membrane formation.

Conclusions:

AoSA steepening generated substantial hemodynamic stress abnormalities in LVOT regions prone to DSS formation. Further studies are needed to assess the possible impact of such mechanical abnormalities on the tissue and cellular responses.

Keywords: discrete subaortic stenosis, aortoseptal angle, left ventricular outflow tract, wall shear stress, fluid-structure interaction modeling, hemodynamics

2. Introduction

Discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) is an obstruction to systolic blood flow in the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) and is characterized by the formation of a fibromuscular ring of tissue1,2. DSS occurs in 6% of children with congenital heart defects and accounts for 8-30% of total LVOT obstructions in the pediatric population1,3. Unless the obstruction is surgically removed, most patients develop a spectrum of secondary pathologies including aortic regurgitation, LV hypertrophy and dysfunction, cardiac arrhythmias, endocarditis, systolic anterior motion, and death3-7. Surgical resection of the membrane is currently the only therapeutic option but is associated with major complications such as aortic regurgitation, mitral valve damage, and iatrogenic heart block5,8. Even upon successful removal, the lesion recurs in up to 34% of patients7, necessitating intensive follow-up and additional interventions.

The challenges posed by DSS and its complications justify the need to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of its pathogenesis. Although this knowledge remains limited, the frequent occurrence of DSS in LVs with a steep aortoseptal angle (AoSA, angle between the long axis of the aorta and the septal wall) has provided more support to a hemodynamic etiology1,2,4,8-10. The validation of this hypothetical pathway first requires the demonstration of hemodynamic alterations in LVOT anatomies vulnerable to DSS. In vivo and in vitro modalities have been employed to characterize global LV function in normal, pre-, and post-resection patients5-7,11-14 and to resolve the local interventricular flow field15,16, respectively. Image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, which use medical images to reconstruct LV anatomies and deformation, have also been used to capture the native interventricular filling and systolic ejection hemodynamics17-21, as well as the instantaneous17,22-24 and time-averaged LV wall shear stress (WSS) environments25,26. However, few studies have explored the impact of DSS-prone LVOT anatomies on LV hemodynamics. One CFD study implementing idealized LV geometries and deformations suggested an increase in WSS magnitude along the septal wall with decreasing AoSA9. More recently, a two-dimensional (2D) flow model published by our group explored the impact of AoSA abnormalities and DSS on LV hemodynamics in a patient-specific LV geometry with realistic wall motion27. The study revealed that a 20° reduction in AoSA resulted in substantial WSS magnitude and temporal gradient overloads on the septal wall (23% and 69% increase in temporal shear magnitude and temporal shear gradient, respectively). Those results not only indicated a potential causality between AoSA steepening and WSS overloads in septal wall regions prone to DSS lesion formation, but also demonstrated the existence of stenotic, disturbed, and rotational valvular hemodynamics in DSS LVOTs. Our group also elucidated the impact of AoSA steepening on hemodynamic abnormalities by utilizing fluid-structure interaction (FSI) modeling in a unified 2D LV-aortic valve flow model over a limited range of AoSAs (e.g., 110° - 130°) in both an unobstructed and DSS LVOT anatomies28. The results indicated that both AoSA steepening and DSS generated stenotic hemodynamics and complex vorticity dynamics downstream the LVOT, which caused alterations in leaflet WSS and kinematics.

Although those computational efforts have provided new insights into LV hemodynamics and function in DSS-prone and DSS LVs, characterizing the complex LV fluid dynamics and stress environment requires the development of more sophisticated models capturing the three-dimensionality (3D) of the flow. In addition, the anatomic variability observed between DSS patients justifies the need for investigating a wider range of AoSAs. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to investigate computationally the modulation of the 3D LV WSS environment over the full clinical range of AoSAs.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. LV Reconstruction

The 3D LV model consisted of two domains: 1) a fictitious shell model representing the LVOT and LV walls, and 2) a fluid domain representing the blood volume contained within (Figure 1A). The anatomy was acquired from cardiac cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a healthy 21-year old female volunteer using a 3T scanner (GE Medical Systems MR 750w). Images were captured in the short-axis, 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views, with an in-plane resolution of 256 mm and a slice thickness of 8 mm. Using a previously published methodology27,28, the mid-systolic interior blood volume was semi-automatically segmented using Segment v3.0 R7568 (Medviso AB, Lund, Sweden29) and finalized in SolidWorks (SolidWorks, Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France) to produce a spatially-smooth geometry (further details provided in Appendix section A.1). To assess the potential impact of AoSA abnormalities on the LV hemodynamic stress environment, four LV models were constructed by progressively steepening the AoSA in 15° increments to represent the full range (115°-160°) reported in the literature2-4,7,10 (Figure 1B). To effectively isolate the impact of the AoSA on LV hemodynamics, all models shared the same LV geometry, wall deformation patterns and flow boundary conditions. Cardiac deformation was prescribed using a previously published methodology27,28 in which the native deformation was mapped to the fictitious shell model via a series of displacement nodes (see Appendix – section A.2 for further details).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Reconstruction of the 3D left ventricle (LV) model and deformation patterns from patient-specific cine-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): (A) MR image of mid-systolic LV overlapped with schematic depicting both reconstructed 3D interior LV blood volume and bounding fictitious solid shell model; and (B) left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometries over the range of aortoseptal angles (AoSAs) considered in this study.

3.2. LV Flow Modeling

LV flow was computed via a one-way FSI strategy using the commercial software ANSYS 2019 R3 (ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA). The flow equations were computed via an arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) strategy30, in which a dynamic mesh was fixed to the deforming fluid boundary and smoothed/remeshed at each time step to maintain an acceptable grid quality. The governing flow equations consisted of the continuity and Navier-Stokes equations in their ALE forms:

V¯=0,

and

ρ{V¯t+[(V¯W¯)]V¯}=τ=+f¯,

respectively, where V¯ is the fluid velocity vector, W¯ is the moving mesh velocity vector, τ= is the fluid stress tensor, and f¯ is the body force per unit volume. Blood was approximated as a laminar, incompressible, Newtonian fluid (density, ρ=1050kg/m3; viscosity, μ=0.0035kg/m s)27,28. The flow boundary conditions at the mitral inlet and LVOT outlet consisted of transient and spatially uniform velocity profiles derived from the temporal variations in LV volume resulting from the prescribed wall displacements. Aortic and mitral valve closure was simulated by enforcing zero flow velocity during diastole and systole, respectively.

3.3. Spatial Discretization Characteristics

The fluid domain was discretized using a combination of unstructured tetrahedral and hexahedral cells. Following a mesh sensitivity analysis (see Appendix – section A.3), each model was meshed with a fluid grid size of ~1.2 million cells, including inflation layers along the ventricular wall (n = 10 layers; total thickness = 2 mm) to effectively capture boundary layer characteristics.

3.4. Hemodynamic Analysis

3.4.1. Global Flow Characterization

Global hemodynamics were assessed in terms of velocity magnitude captured over the entire fluid domain. To better represent the flow structure, massless particles were virtually injected through the mitral orifice during the diastolic phase and tracked using the built-in Eulerian-Lagrangian approach.

3.4.2. Wall Stress Characterization

To investigate the possible impact of AoSA abnormalities on the LV endocardium, time-averaged pressure and WSS characteristics were captured. Although these quantities can be extracted from computational nodes on the fluid domain boundary, nodal locations were not systematically preserved between two consecutive time steps due to the dynamic remeshing and smoothing implemented as part of the FSI methodology. To allow for the calculation of time-averaged wall metrics, which requires one-to-one node connectivity between subsequent time steps, an in-house MATLAB algorithm was developed to automatically track computational node positions (see Appendix – section A.4; freely available at https://github.com/RaiderDoc/MATLAB_tracking_algorithm.git). Pressure characteristics were quantified by assessing the cycle-averaged static pressure acting on the LV luminal surface, pave, expressed as:

pave=1T0Tpdt,

where is the total cardiac cycle time, and p is the instantaneous static pressure. To allow for a meaningful comparison across all models, a normalized value (p^ave) was calculated using the global maximum and minimum values across all models:

p^ave=pavepave,minpave,maxpave,min.

WSS characteristics consisted of the oscillatory shear index (OSI) and the temporal shear magnitude (TSM), defined as:

OSI=12[1(0Tτ¯dt0Tτ¯dt)],

and

TSM=1T0Tτ¯dt,

respectively, where τ¯ is the instantaneous local WSS vector and T is the cardiac period. The OSI quantifies the oscillatory nature of the WSS signal (OSI = 0: purely pulsatile/unidirectional; OSI = 0.5: purely oscillatory/bidirectional), while the TSM characterizes the time-averaged magnitude of the WSS over one cardiac cycle.

Due to its ability to quantify the complex and highly dynamic features of the WSS field31,32, the WSS topological skeleton was also quantified. Briefly, analyzing the WSS topological skeleton consists of identifying the fixed points within the WSS vector field (i.e., points where the field itself vanishes) and the stable/unstable manifolds that connect them (i.e., regions of WSS contraction/expansion, respectively). This was achieved using a recently developed Eulerian identification method31, in which fixed points were first identified using the Poincaré index33. Possible values of the Poincaré index are 0 (fixed point free region), −1 (saddle point), and +1 (possible node/focus). Once the locations of the fixed points were determined, they were further classified as stable/unstable node/focus by analyzing the three eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix of the LV WSS vector field31,32. Finally, WSS manifolds occupying the LV luminal surface were identified by calculating the divergence of the WSS vector field:

(τ¯)=τ1x1+τ2x2+τ3x3.

Positive and negative values indicate locations of WSS stretching and compression on the endocardium, respectively34. To allow for a meaningful comparison across all models, a normalized WSS divergence value (WSSdiv) was generated by scaling the local WSS divergence by the maximum value predicted among all models:

WSSdiv=(τ¯)(τ¯)max.

4. Results

Each model was run for four cardiac cycles to achieve temporal convergence. The data presented in this section were captured during the fourth cycle.

4.1. Global Flow Parameters and Velocity Fields

The transient LV blood volumes over one cardiac cycle were extracted from the baseline 160° model and compared qualitatively with the patient-specific cine-MRI dataset (Figure 2). The model predicted an end-diastolic and end-systolic volume of 107.7 mL and 51.1 mL, respectively. The predicted stroke volume and ejection fraction were 56.6 mL and 52.6%, respectively. These calculated values are in good agreement with those derived from the patient-specific cine-MRI dataset (< 2% difference between predicted and patient-specific end-diastolic/systolic and stroke volumes and ejection fractions, respectively).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Predicted and measured time variation of the left ventricle (LV) volume for both the numerical simulation and cine-MRI dataset, respectively.

Maximum velocity magnitudes predicted at peak systole (t = 0.83 s) and during early filling (E-wave, t = 0.33 s) are presented in Table 1. Snapshots of the global flow fields captured at these times are shown in Figure 3 (animations of the velocity fields over one cardiac cycle are included in Supplementary Video 1).

Table 1.

Peak velocity magnitudes (m/s) predicted in each left ventricle (LV) model at the two time points.

time point 160° 145° 130° 115°
peak systole 1.41 1.28 1.24 1.31
e-wave 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.95

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Snapshots of velocity field visualized using volume rendering and injected with massless particles captured during peak systole (t = 0.83 s) and early filling (E-wave, t = 0.33 s) (b: recirculation bubble; inset: pressure (p)-volume (v) diagram showing cardiac cycle phase).

Peak-systolic ejection in each model was marked by blood flow convergence from the LV apex towards the LVOT, followed by the development of a strong, high-velocity jet in the outflow tract. Additionally, local subaortic blood flow patterns in each model were impacted by AoSA alterations. The larger AoSAs (> 130°) generated a more streamlined flow structure due to the continuity in flow angle between the jet formed within the LV and the LVOT axis. Conversely, the sudden change in flow angle between the LV jet and the LVOT axis in the steeper models (< 130°) resulted in decreased jet momentum and an effective reduction in ejected blood flow velocity (at least 8% decrease in peak systolic velocity magnitude vs. < 145° models). The steeper models (< 130°) also exhibited increased flow skewness towards the superior LVOT and complex secondary flow patterns characterized by the formation of a recirculation bubble (label b in Figure 3) downstream of the LV-LVOT junction.

Diastolic filling in all models was characterized by the rapid influx of blood through the mitral inlet into the LV chamber. The large velocity gradient generated between the inflow and the near-stagnant blood within the LV generated a vortex ring immediately below the mitral orifice. The offset between the mitral inlet and the ventricle long axis caused the vortex to grow asymmetrically and eventually dissipate throughout the diastolic filling phase. The maximum LV velocity magnitudes at this time point were essentially similar between the models (< 1% difference in peak LV velocity magnitude between models).

The 3D velocity profiles captured at the base of the LVOT at peak systole and during early filling are described and discussed in Appendix – section B.1

4.2. LV Wall Stress Characterization

The contours of the cycle-averaged LV hemodynamic stresses are shown in Figure 4 (animations showing the temporal variations of those contour fields are included in Supplementary Video 2).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Spatial distributions of the hemodynamic stress metrics along the LV lumen in each of the four left ventricle (LV) models: (A) normalized cycle-averaged pressure, p^ave ; (B) the oscillatory shear index (OSI; label d denotes strong multidireciotnal wall shear stress, WSS, region); (C) temporal shear magnitude (TSM); and (D) cycle-averaged WSS topological skeleton showing the normalized divergence of the WSS vector field (WSSdiv) and predicted fixed points (label f denotes LVOT fixed points region; inset: posterior LV base).

4.2.1. Cycle-Averaged Pressure Distribution

Each model exhibited a near-uniform p^ave distribution within the LV chamber (Figure 4A). Conversely, the high-velocity jet caused by the flow passage from the large LV chamber through the narrow LVOT generated a Venturi effect within the outflow tract, as indicated by the dramatic reduction in pressure acting on the LVOT. As expected, AoSA steepening caused an abrupt pressure reduction at the LVOT, which is consistent with the loss of continuity in jet alignment previously described for the steeper AoSAs (< 130°).

4.2.2. WSS Directional and Magnitude Characteristics

Contrasting with the pressure distributions, the OSI predicted on the LV wall was more heterogeneous (Figure 4B). Increased WSS multidirectionality was detected over an area spanning the posterior LV base and extending helically towards the LV apex (see Supplementary Video 2), whereas generally more unidirectional WSS patterns (OSI < 0.25) were detected within the LVOT. Strong WSS multidirectionality (OSI > 0.3) was detected downstream of the LV-LVOT junction in all models (label d in Figure 4B) but the size and location of this region were strongly dependent on the AoSA. In the 160° model, this region was localized on the superior LVOT, downstream of the sharp junction between the mitral inlet and LVOT outlet. AoSA steepening shifted this region around the LV anterior wall. Moreover, the region observed in the 115° model was markedly more diffuse and trailed further into the LVOT than in the other models. Analysis of the TSM distribution indicated AoSA-dependent regions of high TSM at the LV-LVOT junction, coupled with low WSS magnitudes within the LV chamber and distal LVOT (Figure 4C). Similar to the OSI predictions, peak WSS magnitudes were detected on the superior LVOT at the sharp junction between the mitral inlet and LVOT outlet in the 160° model. AoSA steepening not only shifted this region around the anterior LVOT circumference but was also accompanied by higher WSS magnitude. The regions experiencing increased WSS magnitude in the steeper models (< 130°) were identified near the crest of the interventricular septum.

4.2.3. WSS Topological Skeleton

The analysis of the global WSS topological skeleton indicated its weak dependence on LVOT anatomical alterations (Figure 4D). Fixed points were primarily identified on the LV posterior wall and apex, which colocalized with regions of high OSI, while saddle points and unstable foci were detected near the LV-LVOT junction. Additionally, all models exhibited similar concentric regions of WSS expansion and contraction occurring immediately upstream of and at the LV-LVOT junction, respectively. Beside these similarities, the local LVOT WSS topological skeletons exhibited important model-dependent characteristics. In models with larger AoSAs (> 130°), fixed point were primarily found lining the superior LVOT circumference (label f in Figure 4D). Consistent with previous observations, AoSA steepening caused an anterior-to-inferior shift in fixed point distribution around the LVOT circumference. Analysis of the WSS manifolds supported these observations, as the larger AoSAs (> 130°) generated regions of strong WSS contraction on the superior LVOT near the sharp junction between the mitral inlet and LVOT outlet. Again, AoSA steepening caused this region to increasingly shift around the anterior LVOT circumference towards the inferior LVOT.

4.3. LV-LVOT Junction Hemodynamic Stress Characteristics

The regional distributions of cycle-averaged hemodynamic stress metrics at the LV-LVOT junction were further analyzed in four quadrants consisting of the LVOT superior, anterior, inferior, and posterior regions.

4.3.1. Regional Cycle-Averaged Pressure Characteristics

The average pressure magnitude captured in all quadrants of the LV-LVOT junction was strongly AoSA-dependent (Figure 5A), as the 130° and 145° models predicted the largest overload (55% increase) and underload (39% decrease) in junction-averaged p^ave, respectively, relative to the 160° model. Regional comparison between the models indicated that AoSA alterations also impacted the local pressure. AoSA steepening contributed to pressure reductions and overloads primarily on the inferior and superior LVOT quadrants, respectively (inferior: >22% decrease in p^ave vs. 160° model; superior: >130% increase).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Regional hemodynamic stress characteristics around the LV-LVOT junction: (A) normalized cycle-averaged pressure (p^ave); (B) oscillatory shear index (OSI); (C) temporal shear magnitude (TSM); and (D) the normalized divergence of the wall shear stress (WSS) vector field (WSSdiv).

4.3.2. Regional Oscillatory Shear Index Characteristics

For models with larger AoSAs (> 130°), OSI values captured at the LV-LVOT junction (Figure 5B) indicated some degree of WSS multidirectionality (OSI < 0.23), except in the posterior quadrants. AoSA steepening slightly attenuated WSS oscillations in the inferior and posterior LVOT regions (inferior: > 0.04-point reduction in OSI vs. 160° model; posterior: > 0.002-point reduction). The effect of AoSA steepening on OSI in the LVOT anterior and superior quadrants did not follow any particular trend.

4.3.3. Regional Temporal Shear Index Characteristics

AoSA steepening caused substantial WSS overloads at the LV-LVOT junction (up to 32% increase in junction-averaged TSM vs. 160° model; Figure 5C). As an exception to this general trend, the 130° model only resulted in a minor increase in WSS magnitude (3% increase vs. 160° model). The regional analysis, however, indicated that AoSA steepening subjected the inferior LVOT quadrant to increasing levels of WSS overload (> 45% increase in TSM vs. 160° model). Though WSS overloads were also detected on the LVOT superior region (> 3% increase in TSM vs. 160° model), they weakly correlated with the AoSA. Consistent with the OSI distribution, the TSM captured in the LVOT anterior and posterior quadrants was AoSA-dependent but did not follow any particular trend.

4.3.4. Regional WSS Manifold Characteristics

Analysis of the WSS manifolds in all quadrants around the LV-LVOT junction (Figure 5D) indicated that nearly all models (except the 130° model) were subjected to WSS contraction (junction-averaged WSSdiv<0.12). Comparison of the discrete LVOT regional characteristics on the inferior quadrants suggested a possible colocalization of high WSS magnitude and contraction. With the exception of the 130° model, AoSA steepening subjected both the anterior and inferior LVOT regions to a substantial WSS contraction (anterior: > 36% decrease WSSdiv vs. 160° model; inferior: > 66% decrease). At the same time, AoSA steepening also subjected the posterior LVOT regions to AoSA-dependent WSS expansion (> 57% increase in WSSdiv vs. 160° model).

5. Discussion

This study investigated the influence of AoSA alterations on the 3D LV hemodynamic stress characteristics. Specifically, the main contributions are: (1) the demonstration of the remarkable impact of AoSA steepening on subaortic flow dynamics; and (2) the demonstration of causality between AoSA anomalies and WSS abnormalities in regions prone to DSS lesion formation. This work quantifies for the first time the sensitivity of the LV hemodynamic stress environment to LVOT angular alterations.

5.1. AoSA Steepening Generates Abnormal Subaortic Blood Flow Dynamics

The image-based, one-way FSI strategy implemented in this study was able to replicate physiologic ventricular hemodynamics. First, the agreement between the global hemodynamic parameters measured in the cine-MRI dataset and those predicted in this work (< 2% difference between predicted and patient-specific volumes) provides some confidence on the validity of the models. In addition, the models were able to capture specific LV blood flow patterns that have been extensively reported in the literature. Systolic ejection was characterized by the immediate redirection and convergence of blood flow towards the LVOT, while diastolic filling was dominated by the formation of an asymmetric diastolic vortex ring, thought to be crucial to cardiac function12,17,21. These flow patterns are consistent with previous in vivo11-13, in vitro15,16, and numerical characterizations of ventricular hemodynamics18,19,21,27,35. In addition, the systolic and diastolic flow velocity magnitudes predicted in this study (systole: 1.24 – 1.41 m/s; diastole: 0.95 – 0.96 m/s) are in close agreement with those reported in the literature (systole: 1.4 – 1.6 m/s; diastole; 0.3 – 1.0 m/s)11,12,16-18,21.

A key finding is the existence of local hemodynamic abnormalities associated with AoSA steepening. In the steeper models (< 130°), subaortic blood flow was characterized by increased flow velocity near the septum, increased blood flow skewness towards the top of the LVOT, and flow detachment and downstream recirculation. This description is consistent with clinical reports, which have described deranged blood flow patterns in DSS patients and altered LVOT anatomies6,7,36-39. The present results are also in agreement with a previous computational study9, which indicated an increase in near-wall spatial velocity gradients associated with AoSA steepening in a simplified LV geometry. Interestingly, as compared to our previous 2D models in which velocity distributions were weakly impacted by AoSA steepening27, the present models suggested the existence of asymmetric and skewed blood flow patterns. This discrepancy justifies the need for 3D modeling when characterizing LV hemodynamics.

5.2. One-Way FSI Framework Effectively Captures Complex Hemodynamic Stress Environment

Due to challenges posed by the smoothing and remeshing strategies imposed by the ALE modeling approach, few studies have attempted to characterize the cycle-average LV hemodynamic stress environment. In this study, an in-house algorithm was developed to track the position of the surface mesh nodes and to maintain node correspondence throughout the cardiac cycle. The resulting cycle-averaged directional and magnitude characteristics predicted in this study are consistent with previous characterizations25,26. As reported in previous 3D LV numerical studies26, spatial OSI distributions in all models were characterized by regions of increased WSS multidirectionality spanning the posterior LV base and extending helically towards the LV apex. While it has been suggested that the rapid formation of the interventricular vortex near the LV base may generate local instantaneous WSS overloads17, the current study reveals that this vortex subjects the same regions to increased WSS multidirectionality. Consistent with previous computational TSM characterizations25, all models predicted elevated WSS magnitudes at the LV-LVOT junction, which contrasted with the more moderate magnitudes acting on both the LV chamber and downstream of the LVOT. This description also aligns with previous reports, which evidenced elevated shear stresses (5 – 40 Pa) on the inferior LV-LVOT junction and low shear stresses elsewhere17,22-24. Interestingly, the cycle-averaged WSS predictions reported in this study contrast with those of our previous 2D LV numerical investigation27. While the 3D models systematically indicated the existence of high unidirectional shear stress (OSI < 0.2; TSM > 2.0 Pa) near the inferior LVOT, the previous simplified 2D models predicted a low oscillatory shear stress (OSI > 0.31; TSM < 2.0 Pa), justifying the need for a 3D modeling strategy in capturing the native LV WSS environment.

The present simulations also provide novel characterizations of the cycle-averaged WSS topological skeletal features and ventricular surface pressure. A large number of fixed points were identified on the posterior LV wall, which colocalized with regions of high WSS multidirectionality. This indicates the potential for interventricular flow patterns to expose the LV endocardium to rich and complex WSS. Further, progressive AoSA steepening led to a reduction in pressure acting at the LVOT inlet, which may have important implications for DSS concomitant pathologies such as systolic anterior motion (SAM). SAM is an obstruction of the LVOT resulting from the displacement of the anterior mitral valve leaflet towards the septum23,40. A clinical link has been established between steepened AoSA and SAM41 but the reasons for this causality remain unclear. The LVOT pressure reductions predicted in our study in the steeper models (< 130°) may induce aberrant motion of the anterior mitral valve toward the septal wall, which could explain the association between DSS and SAM. The addition of a function mitral valve geometry to our LV-LVOT models could assess the validity of this hypothetical etiology.

5.3. Progressive AoSA Steepening Subjects Septal Wall Regions Prone to DSS to Substantial Hemodynamic Stress Abnormalities

An important observation is the apparent relation between AoSA steepening and the increasing degree of hemodynamic stress abnormality in the LVOT. Quantitatively, this was evidenced by pressure reductions and substantial increases in WSS unidirectionality, magnitude, and contraction in the inferior LV-LVOT region of nearly every model. These findings are in agreement with previous numerical studies8,9,27, and support early clinical reports of an association between AoSA steepening and WSS abnormalities1,3,10,42. In addition, the results highlight the need to consider the full clinical AoSA range, as the current TSM overloads reported in the inferior LV-LVOT junction region (up to 100% increase in TSM vs. 160° model) are substantially larger than those previously reported by our group over a much narrower range of AoSAs (up to 24% increase vs. normal AoSA)8,27. It is important to note that the simplifications and the parametric approach implemented in the present study were necessary to effectively capture the isolated effects of AoSA abnormalities on the LVOT wall. Therefore, while the raw quantitative analysis should be interpreted with caution, the predicted trends are more relevant and meaningful.

Elucidating the novel LV WSS topological skeleton complemented the characterization of traditional hemodynamic stress metrics. Several studies have investigated the WSS topological skeleton in the context of cardiovascular flows31,32, and have attempted to link identified abnormalities with focal pathological vascular43 and valvular44 responses. To the authors’ knowledge, however, this study is the first to elucidate the WSS topological skeleton on the LV wall. Moreover, the results indicate concurrent WSS overloads (up to 100% increase in TSM vs. 160° model) and intense shear stress contraction (up to 307% decrease in WSSdiv vs. 160° model) in the inferior LVOT quadrants of the steeper models (< 130°). It is currently unknown, however, whether LV endocardial cell biology is sensitive to increased shear stress contraction. Consequently, further biological studies are needed to assess the effects of such abnormalities at the tissue and cellular levels.

5.4. Potential Significance for DSS Pathogenesis and Future Outlook

The hemodynamic stress abnormalities captured on the inferior LVOT in the steeper models provide new insights into the possible role played by mechanical stresses in DSS pathogenesis. It has been proposed that high WSS magnitude may interact with the endocardium to drive fibrosis and membrane formation1,8,9. Cardiac tissue is subjected to a wide range of dynamic mechanical shear stresses, and cardiomyocytes respond to these mechanical forces through cellular proliferation, enlargement, and remodeling45. While flow-mediated signaling molecules have been identified and are known to regulate cardiomyocyte response and maturation, the understanding of their biological impact remains incomplete46. Shearing forces generated from embryonic blood flow, however, have been proposed to play a critical role in cardiac development via triggering endocardial responses45-47. Zebrafish embryos with either impaired cardiac blood flow or denuding of the endocardium have demonstrated substantial morphological abnormalities in cardiac structure47,48. Collectively, these findings indicate that the endocardium is flow-sensitive and has the ability to modulate tissue response in response to fluid shear stress. Unfortunately, to the authors’ knowledge, no study has examined the sensitivity of neonatal, pediatric, and/or adult endocardial cells to such mechanistic abnormalities as those predicted in this study.

Despite this knowledge gap, disturbed flow has been shown to alter endothelial cell-smooth muscle cell communication and behavior in blood vessels49,50. WSS, moreover, has been shown to be pivotal in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis by contributing to the loss of tissue homeostasis and alteration of endothelial cell phenotype51,52. Recent ex vivo experiments on porcine aortic tissue have shown that WSS magnitude overloads secondary to valvular defects contribute to progressive degeneration of the tunica media53-55. Additionally, in vitro studies in a step-flow channel have evidenced increased cellular proliferation in flow reattachment regions subjected to high WSS spatial gradients56,57. In light of the current study, the identification of WSS overloads coinciding with regions prone to DSS formation (i.e., inferior LV-LVOT junction region) in the steeper models is promising. Mechanobiological investigations are sorely needed, however, to fully characterize the biological response of cardiac tissues subjected to such WSS characteristics.

5.5. Limitations

Due to limitations in the spatial resolution of the cine-MRI dataset used to reconstruct the LV model, the trabeculae carneae and papillary muscles were excluded from the endocardial topology. This smooth-walled simplification, however, is commonly made in LV CFD characterizations17,18,58 and has been shown to generate similar LV flow dynamics to that measured by phase-contrast MRI18,21,35.

The exclusion of the mitral and aortic valves was another simplification made to reduce the complexity of the model. While previous investigations implementing ventricular and valvular geometries have effectively characterized interventricular flow patterns17,22, the concurrent simulation of a functional valve within a deforming LV is computationally expensive. Models that have attempted to circumvent this issue by approximating valvular motion using a dynamic 2D planar orifice have shown good agreement with in vivo data18,19,21. Therefore, while modeling the mitral inlet and LVOT outlet as instantaneous open/closed orifices does not replicate the native pressure-driven valvular dynamics and its impact on the adjacent flow field, it is a suitable simplification for the purpose of this study. Finally, consistent with other LV CFD studies implementing a similar valvular modeling strategy20,24,58, our models were able to capture physiological phenomena such as the formation of diastolic vortex rings and the typical flow features observed during interventricular filling and systolic ejection.

Blood was approximated as Newtonian while the flow was modeled as laminar. As demonstrated in another computational study, which compared LV hemodynamics using a Newtonian formulation and various non-Newtonian models58, peak-systolic LV flow characteristics are weakly impacted by non-Newtonian effects. This validates the Newtonian viscous approximation in the present work. The effects of turbulence were ignored for two reasons: 1) previous efforts by our group revealed similar global ventricular hemodynamics using the shear stress transport kω turbulence model27 and a laminar flow approximation28, and 2) the implementation of a laminar model is a common approximation in computational characterizations of ventricular blood flow18-22,24,35,58.

Supplementary Material

Appendix
Figure S1
Figure S2
Supplementary video S1
Download video file (2.1MB, mp4)
Supplementary video S2
Download video file (2.8MB, mp4)

11. Summary.

Discrete subaortic stenosis (DSS) is an obstructive cardiac disease characterized by the formation of a thin fibromuscular ring of tissue in the left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT). Although its etiology is unknown, the association between DSS and morphological LVOT abnormalities, such as a steepened aortoseptal angle (AoSA) points to a potential hemodynamic etiology. It has been suggested that altered subaortic flow dynamics and fluid shear stresses caused by LVOT anatomical aberrations may promote lesion formation. The assessment of this hypothetical pathway requires elucidation of the complex LV hemodynamic stress environment and its modulation by LVOT anatomical defects associated with DSS. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to quantify computationally the variations of the 3D LV hemodynamic stress environments over the range of clinically-reported AoSA abnormalities associated with DSS. Cine cardiac MRI images were segmented to reconstruct a 3D LV geometry, and patient-specific ventricular deformation was imposed via a one-way fluid-structure interaction technique in ANSYS 2019 R3. Four geometries with AoSAs varying from 160° to 115° were then generated to span the physiologic range reported in the literature. LV hemodynamics was characterized in terms of cycle-averaged pressure, temporal shear magnitude (TSM) and oscillatory shear index (OSI). The scaled WSS topological skeleton (WSSdiv) was also computed to map the features of the WSS vector field. The flow predictions showed good agreement with both patient data and published LV flow fields. AoSA steepening contributed to an increasing degree of subaortic flow disturbance and hemodynamic stress abnormality preferentially near the LVOT region adjacent to the septal wall. These abnormalities primarily consisted of WSS overloads (> 45% increase in TSM vs. 160° model) and stronger WSS contraction (> 66% decrease in WSSdiv vs. 160° model) in regions prone to DSS formation. AoSA steepening generated substantial hemodynamic stress abnormalities in LVOT regions prone to DSS formation. Altogether, these novel characterizations provided critical insight into the potential mechano-etiological pathways of DSS.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Roldán-Alzate (University of Wisconsin-Madison) for his contributions in acquiring the MRI data.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01HL140305), and the 2020 Ohio Space Grant Consortium STEM Fellowship.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Jason A. Shar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kennesaw State University, 840 Polytechnic Lane, Marietta, GA 30060, USA

Sundeep G. Keswani, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Texas Children’s Hospital, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine

K. Jane Grande-Allen, Department of Bioengineering, Rice University.

Philippe Sucosky, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kennesaw State University, 840 Polytechnic Lane, Marietta, GA 30060, USA.

10 References

  • 1.Foker JE Outcomes and questions about discrete subaortic stenosis. Circulation vol. 127 1447–1450 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sigfússon G, Tacy TA, Vanauker MD & Cape EG Abnormalities of the left ventricular outflow tract associated with discrete subaortic stenosis in children: An echocardiographic study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 30, 255–259 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kleinert S & Geva T Echocardiographic morphometry and geometry of the left ventricular outflow tract in fixed subaortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 22, 1501–1508 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barboza LA, de Garcia FM, Barnoya J, Leon-Wyss JR & Castañeda AR Subaortic Membrane and Aorto-Septal Angle: An Echocardiographic Assessment and Surgical Outcome. World J. Pediatr. Congenit. Heart Surg 4, 253–261 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ozsin KK, Toktas F, Sanri US & Yavuz S Discrete subaortic stenosis in an adult patient. Eur. Res. J 2, 66–66 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pickard SS, Geva A, Gauvreau K, Del Nido PJ & Geva T Long-term outcomes and risk factors for aortic regurgitation after discrete subvalvular aortic stenosis resection in children. Heart 101, 1547–1553 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Van Der Linde D, Roos-Hesselink JW, Rizopoulos D, Heuvelman HJ, Budts W, Van Dijk APJ, Witsenburg M, Yap SC, Oxenius A, Silversides CK, Oechslin EN, Bogers AJJC & Takkenberg JJM Surgical outcome of discrete subaortic stenosis in adults a multicenter study. Circulation 127, 1184–1191 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Massé D, Shar JA, Brown KN, Keswani SG, Grande-Allen KJ & Sucosky P Discrete Subaortic Stenosis: Perspective Roadmap to a Complex Disease. Front. Cardiovasc. Med 5, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cape EG, Vanauker MD, Sigfússon G, Tacy TA & Del Nido PJ Potential role of mechanical stress in the etiology of pediatric heart disease: Septal shear stress in subaortic stenosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 30, 247–254 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yap SC, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bogers AJJC & Meijboom FJ Steepened aortoseptal angle may be a risk factor for discrete subaortic stenosis in adults. Int. J. Cardiol 126, 138–139 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fujimoto S, Mohiaddin RH, Parker KH & Gibson DG Magnetic resonance velocity mapping of normal human transmitral velocity profiles. Heart Vessels 10, 236–240 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kilner PJ, Yang G-Z, John Wilkes A, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN & Yacoub MH Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart. NATURE 404, (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim WY, Walker PG, Pedersen EM, Poulsen JK, Oyre S, Houlind K & Yoganathan a P. Left ventricular blood flow patterns in normal subjects: a quantitative analysis by three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 26, 224–38 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou Y-Q, Abassi I & Faerestrand S Flow velocity distributions in the left ventricular outflow tract and in the aortic annulus in patients.with localized basal septal hypertrophy. Eur. Heart J 17, 1404–1412 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khalafvand SS, Voorneveld JD, Muralidharan A, Gijsen FJH, Bosch JG, van Walsum T, Haak A, de Jong N & Kenjeres S Assessment of human left ventricle flow using statistical shape modelling and computational fluid dynamics. J. Biomech 74, 116–125 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Voorneveld J, Saaid H, Schinkel C, Radeljic N, Lippe B, Gijsen FJH, van der Steen AFW, de Jong N, Claessens T, Vos HJ, Kenjeres S & Bosch JG 4-D Echo-Particle Image Velocimetry in a Left Ventricular Phantom. Ultrasound Med. Biol 46, 805–817 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bavo AM, Pouch AM, Degroote J, Vierendeels J, Gorman JH, Gorman RC & Segers P Patient-specific CFD simulation of intraventricular haemodynamics based on 3D ultrasound imaging. Biomed. Eng. Online 15, 107 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Caballero A, Mao W, Liang L, Oshinski J, Primiano C, McKay R, Kodali S & Sun W Modeling Left Ventricular Blood Flow Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol 8, 465–479 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Imanparast A, Fatouraee N & Sharif F The impact of valve simplifications on left ventricular hemodynamics in a three dimensional simulation based on in vivo MRI data. J. Biomech 49, 1482–1489 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saber NR, Wood NB, Gosman AD, Merrifield RD, Yang GZ, Charrier CL, Gatehouse PD & Firmin DN Progress towards patient-specific computational flow modeling of the left heart via combination of magnetic resonance imaging with computational fluid dynamics. Ann. Biomed. Eng 31, 42–52 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Schenkel T, Malve M, Reik M, Markl M, Jung B & Oertel H MRI-Based CFD analysis of flow in a human left ventricle: Methodology and application to a healthy heart. Ann. Biomed. Eng 37, 503–515 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bavo AM, Pouch AM, Degroote J, Vierendeels J, Gorman JH, Gorman RC & Segers P Patient-specific CFD models for intraventricular flow analysis from 3D ultrasound imaging: Comparison of three clinical cases. J. Biomech 50, 144–150 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fumagalli I, Fedele M, Vergara C, Dede’ L, Ippolito S, Nicolò F, Antona C, Scrofani R, & Quarteroni A An image-based computational hemodynamics study of the Systolic Anterior Motion of the mitral valve. Comput. Biol. Med 123, 103922 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moosavi MH, Fatouraee N, Katoozian H, Pashaei A, Camara O & Frangi AF Numerical simulation of blood flow in the left ventricle and aortic sinus using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin 17, 740–749 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Keshavarz‐Motamed Z, Khodaei S, Rikhtegar Nezami F, Amrute JM, Lee SJ, Brown J, Ben‐Assa E, Garcia Camarero T, Ruano Calvo J, Sellers S, Blanke P, Leipsic J, de la Torre Hernandez JM & Edelman ER Mixed Valvular Disease Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Quantification and Systematic Differentiation Using Clinical Measurements and Image-Based Patient-Specific In Silico Modeling. J. Am. Heart Assoc 9, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dedè L, Menghini F & Quarteroni A Computational fluid dynamics of blood flow in an idealized left human heart. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng n/a, 1–24 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shar JA, Brown KN, Keswani SG, Grande-Allen J & Sucosky P Impact of Aortoseptal Angle Abnormalities and Discrete Subaortic Stenosis on Left-Ventricular Outflow Tract Hemodynamics: Preliminary Computational Assessment. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol 8, 1–14 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shar JA, Keswani SG, Grande-Allen KJ & Sucosky P Computational Assessment of Valvular Dysfunction in Discrete Subaortic Stenosis: A Parametric Study. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol (2021) doi: 10.1007/s13239-020-00513-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Heiberg E, Sjögren J, Ugander M, Carlsson M, Engblom H & Arheden H akan. Design and validation of Segment - freely available software for cardiovascular image analysis. BMC Med. Imaging 10, 1 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Donea J, Giuliani S & Halleux JP An arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng 33, 689–723 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mazzi V, Gallo D, Calò K, Najafi M, Khan MO, De Nisco G, Steinman DA & Morbiducci U A Eulerian method to analyze wall shear stress fixed points and manifolds in cardiovascular flows. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol 19, 1403–1423 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arzani A & Shadden SC Wall shear stress fixed points in cardiovascular fluid mechanics. J. Biomech 73, 145–152 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang W, Wang W & Li S Detection and classification of critical points in piecewise linear vector fields. J. Vis 21, 147–161 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang Y, Takao H, Murayama Y & Qian Y Propose a Wall Shear Stress Divergence to Estimate the Risks of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture. Sci. World J 2013, 1–8 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khalafvand SS, Ng EYK, Zhong L & Hung TK Three-dimensional diastolic blood flow in the left ventricle. J. Biomech 50, 71–76 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Almeida I, Caetano F, Trigo J, Mota P & Marques AL High left ventricular outflow tract gradient: aortic stenosis, obstructive hypertropic cardiomyopathy or both? Rev. Port. Cardiol 34, 1–5 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Donald JS, Naimo PS, Richardson M, Bullock A, Weintraub RG, Brizard CP & Konstantinov IE Outcomes of Subaortic Obstruction Resection in Children. Heart Lung Circ. 26, 179–186 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Geva A, McMahon CJ, Gauvreau K, Mohammed L, del Nido PJ & Geva T Risk Factors for Reoperation After Repair of Discrete Subaortic Stenosis in Children. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 50, 1498–1504 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Opotowsky AR, Pickard SS & Geva T Imaging adult patients with discrete subvalvar aortic stenosis. Curr. Opin. Cardiol 32, 513–520 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Qureshi A, Awuor S & Martinez M Adult Presentation of Subaortic Stenosis: Another Great Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Mimic. Heart Lung Circ. 24, e7–e10 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Critoph CH, Pantazis A, Tome Esteban MT, Salazar-Mendiguchía J, Pagourelias ED, Moon JC & Elliott PM The influence of aortoseptal angulation on provocable left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Open Heart 1, e000176 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lampros TD & Cobanoglu A Discrete subaortic stenosis: An acquired heart disease. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg 14, 296–303 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Suzuki D, Funamoto K, Sugiyama S, Nakayama T, Hayase T & Tominaga T Investigation of characteristic hemodynamic parameters indicating thinning and thickening sites of cerebral aneurysms. J. Biomech. Sci. Eng advpub, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ge L & Sotiropoulos F Direction and magnitude of blood flow shear stresses on the leaflets of aortic valves: is there a link with valve calcification? J. Biomech. Eng 132, 014505 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jacot JG, Martin JC & Hunt DL Mechanobiology of cardiomyocyte development. J. Biomech 43, 93–98 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jarrell Lennon, & Jacot. Epigenetics and Mechanobiology in Heart Development and Congenital Heart Disease. Diseases 7, 52 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hove JR, Köster RW, Forouhar AS, Acevedo-Bolton G, Fraser SE & Gharib M Intracardiac fluid forces are an essential epigenetic factor for embryonic cardiogenesis. Nature 421, 172–177 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Smith TK & Bader DM Signals from both sides: Control of cardiac development by the endocardium and epicardium. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol 18, 84–89 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ando J & Yamamoto K Effects of Shear Stress and Stretch on Endothelial Function. Antioxid. Redox Signal 15, 1389–1403 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chistiakov DA, Orekhov AN & Bobryshev YV Effects of shear stress on endothelial cells: go with the flow. Acta Physiol. Oxf. Engl (2016) doi: 10.1111/apha.12725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Barker AJ, Lanning C & Shandas R Quantification of hemodynamic wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve using phase-contrast MRI. Ann. Biomed. Eng 38, 788–800 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bollache E, Fedak PWMM, van Ooij P, Rahman O, Malaisrie SC, McCarthy PM, Carr JC, Powell A, Collins JD, Markl M & Barker AJ Perioperative evaluation of regional aortic wall shear stress patterns in patients undergoing aortic valve and/or proximal thoracic aortic replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg (2017) doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Atkins S, Cao K, Rajamannan NM & Sucosky P Bicuspid Aortic Valve Hemodynamics Induces Abnormal Medial Remodeling in the Convexity of Porcine Ascending Aortas. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol 13, 1209–25 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Atkins SK, Moore A & Sucosky P Bicuspid Aortic Valve Hemodynamics Does Not Promote Remodeling in Porcine Aortic Wall Concavity. World J. Cardiol 8, 89–97 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Atkins SK & Sucosky P The Etiology of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: Focus on Hemodynamics. World J. Cardiol 12, 1227–33 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chien S Molecular and mechanical bases of focal lipid accumulation in arterial wall. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol 83, 131–151 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Tardy Y, Resnick N, Nagel T, Gimbrone MA, & Dewey CF Shear Stress Gradients Remodel Endothelial Monolayers in Vitro via a Cell Proliferation-Migration-Loss Cycle. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 17, 3102–3106 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Doost SN, Zhong L, Su B & Morsi YS The numerical analysis of non-Newtonian blood flow in human patient-specific left ventricle. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed 127, 232–247 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix
Figure S1
Figure S2
Supplementary video S1
Download video file (2.1MB, mp4)
Supplementary video S2
Download video file (2.8MB, mp4)

RESOURCES