Skip to main content
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease logoLink to Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
. 2023 Oct 13;11(10):e1042. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1042

Potential biomarker for diagnosis and therapy of sepsis: Lactylation

ZeXian Sun 1,2, Yu Song 1,2, Jie Li 1,2, Yize Li 1, YongHao Yu 1, Xin Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC10571012  PMID: 37904710

Abstract

Introduction

As a disease that has plagued human health for decades, sepsis has so far had no specific diagnostic or therapeutic indicators. The discovery of lactylation modifications not only uncovered the deep‐rooted causes of changing between lactate level and pathophysiology and immunology of sepsis, but also reaffirmed the inevitable link between metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic reprogramming in sepsis. Lactylation modification became a potential marker for diagnosis and guiding the treatment of sepsis.

Aim

In this paper, we will summarize the discovery and regulation of lactylation modifications, discuss the study of lactylation modifications in sepsis, and evaluate their possibility and potential as diagnostic and therapeutic indicators of sepsis.

Conclusion

Lactylation modification is directly regulated by glycolysis and lactate, and inhibition of glycolytic pathway‐related enzymes can regulate the level of lactylation modification, and more importantly, lactylation modification can act on these enzymes to regulate their functions and feedback regulate the level of glycolysis, this finding provides more ideas for clinical treatment of sepsis. We use “epigenetic modification”, “glycolysis”, “lactate”, “lactylaiton” and “sepsis” as keywords and search the relevant literature through Pubmed and Web of science up to 2023.

Keywords: epigenetic modification, glycolysis, lactate, lactylation, sepsis


Lactylation is a biomarker regulated by glycolysis in sepsis. Sepsis promotes the process of glycolysis, causing histones and nonhistones to be modified by lactylation. Lactylation can indicate not only inflammation but also immune status. Modulation of the glycolysis can inhibit excessive lactylation and reduce mortality of septic mice.

graphic file with name IID3-11-e1042-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Globally, there are more than 48.9 million new cases of sepsis each year and about 11 million deaths, accounting for 20% of global deaths. 1 After decades of research, the mechanism of sepsis and its diagnosis and treatment are still difficult problems, and most of them are based on supportive therapies such as hemodynamic stabilization, antibiotic therapy, and maintenance of organ function, with no specific diagnostic and therapeutic measures yet. 2 , 3 The altered energy metabolism that accompanies sepsis patients has gradually become a focus of attention for researchers in recent years. Transcriptional and metabolic analyses of sepsis patients have shown that the transition from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis is an important component of the initial activation of host defenses. 4 The glycolytic product, lactate, is an important indicator of the severity and mortality of sepsis. 5 , 6 , 7 Both increased lactate production (e.g., hypoxia, increased aerobic glycolysis, and abnormal aerobic metabolism due to impaired mitochondrial function) and decreased lactate clearance lead to lactate accumulation in sepsis patients. 8 Early reduction of serum lactate levels is one of the goals of intensive sepsis treatment, 9 , 10 but the reduction of serum lactate levels in the later stages of sepsis does not significantly improve the prognosis. 11

The idea that lactate is the “ugly duckling” of energy metabolism has been overturned, and there is growing evidence that lactate is not a temporary metabolite in the absence of oxygen, but a fundamental member of energy conversion through blood circulation. 8 It can perform anti‐inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and tissue repair functions through intracellular shuttling and intercellular shuttling. 12 However, how lactate plays a regulatory role in the immune imbalance of sepsis remains a mystery.

In 2019, Prof. Yingmin Zhao's team discovered a novel acylation modification, lactylation modification, and demonstrated that lactate can directly promote histone lactylation and regulate protein gene expression. 13 This discovery combines glycolysis and epigenetics, and also opens up new ideas for the study of sepsis. In this paper, we will summarize the discovery and regulation of lactylation and the current research in sepsis and analyze the prospects of its application in the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis.

2. ALTERATIONS AND ROLE OF LACTATE AND METABOLIC REMODELING IN SEPSIS

International sepsis guidelines recommend early monitoring of patients' blood lactate levels and timely interventions to reduce patients' serum lactate levels (a lactate concentration >2 mmol/L indicates a potential tissue perfusion deficit). 7 , 14 , 15 Elevated blood lactate levels in sepsis patients are the result of a combination of factors, but the massive mobilization of immune cells involved in the inflammatory response to sepsis is the main cause of lactate production and accumulation. 16

During the hyperinflammatory phase of sepsis, apoptosis and 10%–20% persistent lymphocyte death lead to lymphocytopenia, so the body needs to differentiate new lymphocytes rapidly and in large numbers to clear the pathogens from the body. 17 This process, which uses efficient phagocytosis to destroy antigens and mediates an intense inflammatory response, is similar to the “Warburg effect” present in tumor cells. 18 , 19 Although glucose metabolism under aerobic conditions can produce more ATP than under anaerobic conditions, 20 in some special cases, such as sepsis, immune cells tend to obtain energy rapidly through glycolysis as a way to help their rapid proliferation and differentiation to ensure a high‐intensity inflammatory response, to clear pathogens as early as possible. 21 , 22 During this process, lactate is produced in large quantities and inevitably accumulates in the body. 22 For a long time, the idea that lactate is a metabolic waste product was dominant, but with the advancement of science, this stereotype has been disproved. 8

The new view that aerobic glycolysis in the body continues to produce lactate has replaced the old view that lactate is only produced and accumulated under anaerobic conditions. Nowadays, lactate is no longer a metabolic waste product, but is considered as an important source of energy and a precursor and signaling molecule for gluconeogenesis. 23

3. THE FINDINGS OF LACTYLATION

In an attempt to digest the core histones of Michigan Cancer Foundation‐7 for high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)‐tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) analysis, Prof. Yingming Zhao's team detected the same mass transfer (Δm = 72.021 Da) on the lysine residues in the three proteolytic peptides as that induced by the addition of lactyl groups to the ε‐amino groups of the lysine residues. 13

They subsequently demonstrated the presence of histone lactylation modifications using four orthogonal approaches. In addition, they developed a pan‐antilactylation antibody and reconfirmed the presence of histone lactylation modification by western blot and showed that exogenous l‐lactate increased the level of histone lactylation in a dose‐dependent manner. Metabolic labeling experiments with the isotope sodium l‐lactate (13C3) suggested that lactylation of lysine can be derived from lactate. 13 Together, these experimental results demonstrate that histone lactylation is an in vivo protein posttranslational modification (PTM) derived from lactate.

4. THE REGULATION OF LACTYLATION

U‐13C6 glucose labeling experiments showed that the endogenous metabolic pathway by which cells obtain energy through the catabolism of glucose is a key pathway for lactylation. 13 When 2‐deoxy‐d‐glucose (2‐DG), a nonmetabolizable glucose analog, was used instead of glucose, both lactate and lactylation levels were reduced. 13 , 24

The production of lactate depends on the balance between glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration. Sodium dichloroacetate (DCA) and sodium oxamate inhibit pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activities of glycolysis, respectively, which inhibit intracellular lactate production and reduce histone lactylation levels. 13 In contrast, inhibition of the oxidative respiratory chain in mitochondria by rotenone promotes glycolysis and increases intracellular lactate and histone lactylation levels. 13 The increase of exogenous lactate could also increase the lactylation level of histones. 13 It was demonstrated that glycolysis level was a determinant of lactylation modification and lactate was directly responsible for promoting lactylation modification (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Lactate production by the glycolytic pathway regulates the modification of histone and nonhistone lactylation under sepsis conditions. Red box indicates that glycolysis tends to be upregulated, green box indicates that the tricarboxylic acid cycle tend to be downregulated, and this alteration in metabolic homeostasis is commonly found in tissues and cells following sepsis or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induction. The orange‐labeled enzymes were all found to be modifiable by lactylation, and although the function of these enzymes after modification remain undefined, it is certain that the glycolysis‐related enzymes that have a higher propensity to be modified by lactylation. In addition to mediating lactylation modification, lactate is also transported into the mitochondria by the monocarboxylate carrier (MCT), 23 where it is converted to pyruvate by lactate dehydrogenase to participate in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. 25

5. HISTONE LACTYLATION

In eukaryotic cells, the basic unit of chromosomes is the nucleosome. Two H2A–H2B dimers and one H3–H4 tetramer form an octamer, and 200 bp of DNA is wrapped around its surface to form a complete nucleosome. 26 H1 connects adjacent nucleosomes in series to form a chromosome containing all the genetic information of an individual. 27 PTM of histones is an important component of epigenetics, where different acyl groups can be attached to amino acid residues at the amino and carboxyl termini of histones (H1, H2A, H2B, H3, H4). 28 This covalent modification regulates the tightness of histone and DNA binding, regulates the openness of gene loci, affects gene expression, and leads to transcriptional activation or gene silencing. 29 The sites of histone lactylation are summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Sites of histone lactylation. Sites of lactylation identified on four core histones, H3, H4, H2A, and H2B. Numbers represent the different sequences of lysines in histones. Green circles represent humans, orange circles represent mice and purple circles represent cells.

In the earliest studies, histone H3 lysine 18 lactylation (H3K18la) was found to be involved in the expression of homeostatic genes for damage repair, such as Arg‐1. 13 This suggests some role for H3K18la in inflammation‐related diseases. In a clinical study on sepsis, investigators collected peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy volunteers and 35 critically ill patients (septic and nonseptic) and examined them using multiple experimental techniques and found that 30 : (1) H3K18la was commonly expressed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy and critically ill individuals, but H3K18la was significantly elevated in patients in shock, demonstrating that H3K18la is suggestive for extreme critical illness; (2) H3K18la levels were positively correlated with procalcitonin (PCT) and negatively correlated with monocyte percentage, making it clear that high H3K18la expression is associated with infection, and high levels of H3K18la may be expected to be a new indicator of infection, but more clinically relevant data are still needed to prove this; (3) H3K18la was strongly and positively correlated with interleukin (IL)‐6 and IL‐10, and with Arg‐1 mRNA expression was also positively correlated.

In mouse experiments, methylsulfonylmethane could induce macrophage polarization toward wound‐healing type by upregulating H3K18la levels, resulting in decreased plasma levels of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and increased levels of anti‐inflammatory cytokines in septic mice infected with methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus, thereby alleviating the excessive inflammatory response and improving mouse survival. 31 Because lactylation modification is a consequence rather than a cause, these findings clarify the role of H3K18la in the recognition of sepsis and its potential as a diagnostic indicator of septic shock or a prognostic indicator of sepsis, which is expected to assist in the clinical assessment of the immune status of the patient's organism and guide clinical treatment.

6. NONHISTONE LACTYLATION

Although lactylation modification was first identified on histones, it is widely found in the nucleus and cytoplasm, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and cytoskeleton. Hui Ye's team found that at m/z 156.103, a strong CycIm ion was generated after the loss of NH3, which inherits the three‐carbon unit of lactate and then produces a mass shift at m/z 159.1125, and this mass shift difference is where the lactylated peptide exhibits a mass shift (Δm = 3.0101 Da). 32 This demonstrates that CycIm ions can track proteins and sites modified by lactylation with relative accuracy, leading to the finding that lactylation modifications are prevalent in human and mouse cells and exhibit high enrichment in glycolysis‐related enzymes (Figure 1).

The lactylation of the K147 site of aldolase A (ALDOA) was the most frequent, and when the K147 site was modified by lactylation, the activity of ALDOA decreased, which inhibited glycolysis and reduced lactate production, forming a negative feedback regulation of glycolysis. 32 Lysine residues of enolase 1 (ENO1) that could be modified by lactylation accounted for the highest percentage, and the lactylation modification of K343 and K326 regulated the thermal stability of ENO1. 32 Numerous studies have demonstrated that pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) plays a key role in regulating the Warburg effect. Lactylation of the K62 site of PKM2 inhibits glycolysis and induces a shift in macrophages toward a repair phenotype, leading to upregulation of Arg‐1 expression and ultimately promoting wound healing in wound model mice. 33 It is evident that glycolysis‐related enzymes can regulate lactylation modifications through lactate levels, and it was also found that these enzymes themselves can be modified by lactylation and affect glycolysis. Although this feedback regulatory loop still needs more exploration and refinement, the present findings suggest that the link between metabolic reprogramming and epigenetic alterations is complex and tight.

In addition to glycolysis, enzymes in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, carbohydrate, amino acid, fatty acid, and nucleotide metabolic pathways are modified by lactylation. The association between lactylaiton of metabolism‐related enzymes and hepatitis B virus‐associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been confirmed by global lactase profiling and the finding that lactylation of K28 inhibits the function of adenylate kinase 2 (AK2) and promotes the proliferation and metastasis of HCC cells. 34 This also suggests that more inflammation‐related diseases, such as sepsis, can find more specific enzymes and loci through lactate lyase profiling secretion to investigate their regulatory or indicative role in disease development.

High mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) levels are predictive of survival in advanced sepsis. 35 , 36 Lactate not only leads to the accumulation of HMGB1 in macrophages, but also inhibits the deacetylase silencing information regulator 1 (SIRT1) activity and recruits the acetylase CBP/p300, promoting lactylation modification and acetylation modification of HMGB1. 37 , 38 The accumulated HMGB1 is released into the blood via exosomes, and ultimately septic mice have increased mortality. 37

The above findings confirm the inevitable association of histone and nonhistone lactylation modifications with diseases such as infection‐associated diseases and sepsis, and also indicate its potential as a reference indicator for diagnosis of sepsis diseases, determination of disease severity, judgment of prognosis, and guidance of treatment.

7. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LACTYLATION AND ACETYLATION

Studies have shown that the relationship between lactylation and acetylation is relatively close, and the interrelationship between them is also a difficult and hot topic.

Lactate and acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl‐CoA) are both end products of pyruvate in glycolysis. Lactate is produced in the cytoplasm and mediates histone and nonhistone lactylation modifications, 13 acetyl‐CoA is produced in the mitochondria and can participate in both acetylation and the subsequent tricarboxylic acid cycle. 39 Pyruvate can efficiently shuttle between the cytoplasm and mitochondria. 40 Pyruvate is perhaps the key molecule in maintaining lactylation and acetylation homeostasis. 41 In sepsis, complex molecular alterations disrupt the dynamic homeostasis that exists between acetylation and lactylation modifications.

CBP/p300, a histone acetyltransferase and transcriptional cofactor, 42 was the first enzyme shown to mediate lactylation modification. 13 Histone deacetylase 1–3 (HDAC1–3) and silencing SIRT1–3 are the eraser of lysine acetylation regulation and have been shown to catalyze lysine delactylation, but no stable pattern of action and outcome has been found about SIRT1–3, and further studies are needed. 43 Because both lactyl and acetyl groups are derived from the glucose metabolic pathway, and the related enzymes known to regulate lactylation modifications are also related to acetylation regulation, some scholars believe that histone lactylation and acetylation are in a dynamic equilibrium, 41 but the way this equilibrium is constructed is still unknown, because histone lactylation and acetylation modifications exhibit different tendencies to change. 13

8. POTENTIAL RELEVANT AGONISTS OR INHIBITORS OF LACTYLATION REGULATION IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPSIS

The level of lactylation modification is directly regulated by the level of lactate, which in turn determines the production of lactate, so the rate‐limiting enzyme that regulates glycolysis is one of the keys to interfere with lactylation modification (Table 1).

Table 1.

Agents targeting deregulated glycolysis for the treatment of sepsis preclinical studies.

Compounds Mechanism of action Functions in sepsis References
2‐DG An analog of glucose to inhibit HK2 activity Improves in histopathology, pulmonary vascular permeability, inflammatory cell infiltration, oxidative stress damage, and overexpression of pro‐inflammatory factors of lung; reverses the promotion of autophagy in kidney. [24, 44]
Lonidamine Inhibits HK2 Has anti‐inflammatory effects via suppressing the release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines in sepsis. [45, 46]
Sodium oxamate Inhibits LDHA Lower the level of HMGB1, lactate, and lactylation, improve the survival outcome of septic mice. [37]
Chrysin Inhibits HK2 Raises HO‐1 to reduce oxidative stress and inflammation, reverses functional damage in multiple organs such as heart, lung, liver, and kidney, and optimizes histopathological scores, improves sepsis survival by LPS. [47, 48]
Genistein Directly downregulates HIF‐1α, therefore, inactivating GLUT1 and HK2 Improves cognition impairment in septic rats via decreasing inflammatory responses and oxidative stress, and activation of the Nrf2 pathway; Protects LPS‐induced lung vascular endothelial cells apoptosis by the Myd88/NF‐κB/BCL‐2 signaling pathway. [49, 50]
Emodin Decreases glycolytic enzymes expression (HK2, PKM2, and LDHA) Protect intestinal mucosa through the VDR/NRF2/HO‐1 signaling pathway, improve remote liver and lung injury caused by CLP; Improves LPS‐induced myocardial injury and cardiac dysfunction by reducing NLRP3 and GSDMD expression. [51, 52]
Shikonin Inhibits PKM2 Improve sepsis‐induced lung injury by upregulated miRNA‐140‐5p expression; Improve sepsis‐induced acute kidney injury in rats, and attenuate the LPS‐induced kidney tubular epithelial cells apoptosis via modulating NOX4/PTEN/AKT pathway; Inhibit SIRT1‐dependent activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes to ameliorate LPS‐induced cardiac dysfunction. [53, 54, 55]
Cel Inhibits PKM2 and LDHA activity Inhibits the level of pro‐inflammatory cytokines to improve survival in septic mice. [56]
4‐OI Inhibits GAPDH activity Prevents macrophage activation and reduces serum levels of IL‐1β, IL‐6, and lactate in septic mice. [57]
Tiliroside Decreases glycolytic enzymes expression (GLUT1, ENO1, PKM, PDK1, LDHA, PGAM, PFK, GAPDH) Modulates macrophages function and has the anti‐inflammatory effects. [58]

Abbreviations: 2‐DG, 2‐deoxy‐d‐glucose; 4‐OI, 4‐Octyl itaconatek; BCL‐2, B‐cell lymphoma‐2; Cel, celastrol; CLP, cecum ligation and puncture; GSDMD, gasdermin D; HIF‐1α, hypoxia inducible factor‐1 alpha; HK2, hexokinase 2; HO‐1, heme oxygenase‐1; IL, interleukin; LDHA, lactate dehydrogenase A; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NF‐κB, nuclear factor kappa‐B; NLRP3, NOD‐like receptor protein 3; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2‐related factor 2; VDR, vitamin D receptor.

High levels of glycolysis were observed in the lungs of acute lung injury (ALI) patients and LPS‐induced mouse models. 2‐DG pretreatment resulted in suppressed levels of glycolysis in the lung tissue of LPS‐induced ALI mice, significant improvements in histopathology, pulmonary vascular permeability, inflammatory cell infiltration, oxidative stress damage, and overexpression of pro‐inflammatory factors, and a significant increase in the survival rate of LPS‐treated mice. 24 Lactate is an immunosuppressive factor, and high serum lactate levels are a strong negative prognostic factor in patients with severe sepsis. 59 Lactate not only inhibits autophagy, but also reverses the promotion of autophagy by 2‐DG in cells. The protective effect on acute kidney injury (AKI) after inhibition of aerobic glycolysis is being associated with the regulation of enhanced autophagy. 44

Lonidamine (LND) is an HK2 inhibitor whose anti‐inflammatory effects have been demonstrated in mouse models of arthritis and LPS‐induced sepsis. LND inhibits the release of tumor necrosis factorF‐α and IL‐1β caused by LPS stimulation, as well as its induced production of IL‐6 and IL‐8. 45 , 46

In addition to the ability of these specific glycolytic enzyme inhibitors to inhibit the inflammatory effects of sepsis, some drugs that have been shown to have anti‐inflammatory effects in animal studies also exert their anti‐inflammatory effects by modulating glycolysis.

Celastrol (Cel) is a natural anti‐inflammatory compound and the therapeutic effect of this drug on sepsis has been demonstrated in mouse models. Cel improves survival in septic mice by inhibiting the level of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. This therapeutic effect is due to the fact that Cel specifically recognizes and binds to Cys residues in PKM2 and LDHA and inhibits their activity in a dose‐dependent manner. Also Cel directly impairs the ability of HMGB1 to induce cytokine secretion. 56

4‐Octyl itaconatek (4‐OI) alkylates Cys 22 of the glyceraldehyde 3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and decreases GAPDH activity in a time‐ and dose‐dependent manner. In a mouse model of LPS‐induced sepsis, 4‐OI prevented macrophage activation and reduced serum levels of IL‐1β, IL‐6, and lactate. 57

Tiliroside is a flavonoid with proven anti‐inflammatory effects in vivo and in vitro. It inhibits a wide range of enzymes in the glycolytic pathway including glucose transporter 1 (Glut1), enolase 1 (Eno1), and pyruvate kinase M (Pkm). PDH kinase 1 (Pdk1), Aldolase, LDHA, phosphoglycerate mutase (Pgam), phosphofructokinase (Pfk), and GAPDH, reducing the production of lactate. The inhibition of glycolysis by tiliroside modulates intestinal macrophage function and ameliorates ulcerative colitis. 58

9. CONCLUSION AND PROSPECT

With the improvement of medical treatment and scientific research, the therapy and prognosis of sepsis have become more standardized. Globally, the prevalence and mortality of sepsis have improved significantly. Unfortunately, however, there are still no specific diagnostic markers or therapeutic tools for sepsis.

Early studies have successively demonstrated that high lactate levels predict a poor prognosis for patients with sepsis, the idea that sepsis is associated with reduced morbidity and mortality after correction of high lactate during hyperinflammation is well established, and early monitoring and reduction of serum lactate has been included in the latest international guidelines for the management of sepsis and septic shock. These ideas suggest that lactate somehow mediates immune disorders (especially immune paralysis) in sepsis patients, so some investigators have suggested that lactate is an immunosuppressive molecule. The discovery of lactylation modifications apparently explains at the epigenetic level the underlying cause of lactate regulation of immune status in sepsis.

While the use of lactate levels as an indicator of sepsis severity or prognosis has been consistently controversial over the past decades, the emergence of lactylation offers new hope for the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. Lactylation is commonly found in humans, animals, plants, microorganisms, and bacteria. Lactylation is directly regulated by lactate and is highly synergistic with lactate productio, and all factors that regulate glycolysis and affect lactate production can regulate the level of lactylation. The relative stability of lactylation as an “outcome” over time, independent of environmental changes, is one of the most important properties of lactylation as a clinical assessment indicator. Most importantly, lactylation has a bidirectional “promoting” and “inhibiting” effect compared to lactate. Under sepsis conditions, glycolysis is over‐activated, producing and accumulating large amounts of lactate, and glycolytic pathway‐related metabolic enzymes are modified by lactylation to inhibit excessive glycolytic reactions, ensuring the metabolic homeostasis of the body and limiting the level of lactate and lactylation, which is an important mechanism for maintaining the immune balance of the body. However, this feedback loop also indicates that the role of lactylation is multidimensional, and the discovery of it is only the first step in the research, and there is still a long way to go for the study of its mechanism.

Currently, the study of lactylation in sepsis is still in infancy, but it has shown a strong potential as a deeper link between lactate and immunity. Studies in the field of oncology, lactylation is extensively involved in the alteration of intrinsic and adaptive immunity, suggesting the immune status in the tumor microenvironment. Immunomodulation is also an important aspect in sepsis, and perhaps lactylation can replace lactate as one of the key molecule for more scientific and effective diagnosis and therapy.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

ZeXian Sun and Xin Wang, the major contributors to the manuscript, were responsible for the original draft and revision. Yu Song and Yize Li collected data, constructed the figures and tables. YongHao Yu and Xin Wang supervised the work and gave suggestions for the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. This work was supported by the Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project (TJYXZDXK‐036A and TJWJ2022XK012), Youth Incubating Fund of Tianjin Medical university General Hospital (ZYYFY2019023), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82072150 and 82071243).

Sun Z, Song Y, Li J, Li Y, Yu Y, Wang X. Potential biomarker for diagnosis and therapy of sepsis: lactylation. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023;11:e1042. 10.1002/iid3.1042

REFERENCES

  • 1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990‐2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200‐211. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis‐3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801‐810. 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181‐1247. 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cheng SC, Scicluna BP, Arts RJW, et al. Broad defects in the energy metabolism of leukocytes underlie immunoparalysis in sepsis. Nature Immunol. 2016;17(4):406‐413. 10.1038/ni.3398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Liu Z, Meng Z, Li Y, et al. Prognostic accuracy of the serum lactate level, the SOFA score and the qSOFA score for mortality among adults with sepsis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):51. 10.1186/s13049-019-0609-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bolvardi E, Malmir J, Reihani H, et al. The role of lactate clearance as a predictor of organ dysfunction and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. Materia Socio Medica. 2016;28(1):57‐60. 10.5455/msm.2016.28.57-60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Shankar‐Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis‐3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):775‐787. 10.1001/jama.2016.0289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Rabinowitz JD, Enerbäck S. Lactate: the ugly duckling of energy metabolism. Nat Metab. 2020;2(7):566‐571. 10.1038/s42255-020-0243-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pan J, Peng M, Liao C, Hu X, Wang A, Li X. Relative efficacy and safety of early lactate clearance‐guided therapy resuscitation in patients with sepsis: a meta‐analysis. Medicine. 2019;98(8):e14453. 10.1097/MD.0000000000014453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sacha GL, Lam SW, Wang L, Duggal A, Reddy AJ, Bauer SR. Association of catecholamine dose, lactate, and shock duration at vasopressin initiation with mortality in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2022;50(4):614‐623. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hernandez G, Bellomo R, Bakker J. The ten pitfalls of lactate clearance in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(1):82‐85. 10.1007/s00134-018-5213-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Nolt B, Tu F, Wang X, et al. Lactate and immunosuppression in sepsis. Shock. 2018;49(2):120‐125. 10.1097/Shk.0000000000000958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zhang D, Tang Z, Huang H, et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature. 2019;574(7779):575‐580. 10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(11):e1063‐e1143. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304‐377. 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Iepsen UW, Plovsing RR, Tjelle K, et al. The role of lactate in sepsis and COVID‐19: perspective from contracting skeletal muscle metabolism. Exp Physiol. 2021;107:665‐673. 10.1113/EP089474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Girardot T, Rimmelé T, Venet F, Monneret G. Apoptosis‐induced lymphopenia in sepsis and other severe injuries. Apoptosis. 2017;22(2):295‐305. 10.1007/s10495-016-1325-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Arts RJW, Gresnigt MS, Joosten LAB, Netea MG. Cellular metabolism of myeloid cells in sepsis. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;101(1):151‐164. 10.1189/jlb.4MR0216-066R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Vachharajani V, McCall CE. Epigenetic and metabolic programming of innate immunity in sepsis. Innate Immun. 2019;25(5):267‐279. 10.1177/1753425919842320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mookerjee SA, Gerencser AA, Nicholls DG, Brand MD. Quantifying intracellular rates of glycolytic and oxidative ATP production and consumption using extracellular flux measurements. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(17):7189‐7207. 10.1074/jbc.M116.774471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Epstein T, Gatenby RA, Brown JS. The Warburg effect as an adaptation of cancer cells to rapid fluctuations in energy demand. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0185085. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Vandewalle J, Libert C. Sepsis: a failing starvation response. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2022;33(4):292‐304. 10.1016/j.tem.2022.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Brooks GA. Lactate as a fulcrum of metabolism. Redox Biol. 2020;35:101454. 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Zhong WJ, Yang HH, Guan XX, et al. Inhibition of glycolysis alleviates lipopolysaccharide‐induced acute lung injury in a mouse model. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(4):4641‐4654. 10.1002/jcp.27261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Proia P, Di Liegro C, Schiera G, Fricano A, Di Liegro I. Lactate as a metabolite and a regulator in the central nervous system. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(9):1450. 10.3390/ijms17091450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Arents G, Burlingame RW, Wang BC, Love WE, Moudrianakis EN. The nucleosomal core histone octamer at 3.1 A resolution: a tripartite protein assembly and a left‐handed superhelix. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88(22):10148‐10152. 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Syed SH, Goutte‐Gattat D, Becker N, et al. Single‐base resolution mapping of H1‐nucleosome interactions and 3D organization of the nucleosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(21):9620‐9625. 10.1073/pnas.1000309107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zhang Y, Sun Z, Jia J, et al. Overview of histone modification. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1283:1‐16. 10.1007/978-981-15-8104-5_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Cavalieri V. The expanding constellation of histone post‐translational modifications in the epigenetic landscape. Genes. 2021;12(10):1596. 10.3390/genes12101596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chu X, Di C, Chang P, et al. Lactylated histone H3K18 as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and predicting the severity of septic shock. Front Immunol. 2022;12:786666. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.786666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Ma W, Ao S, Zhou J, et al. Methylsulfonylmethane protects against lethal dose MRSA‐induced sepsis through promoting M2 macrophage polarization. Mol Immunol. 2022;146:69‐77. 10.1016/j.molimm.2022.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wan N, Wang N, Yu S, et al. Cyclic immonium ion of lactyllysine reveals widespread lactylation in the human proteome. Nat Methods. 2022;19(7):854‐864. 10.1038/s41592-022-01523-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang J, Yang P, Yu T, et al. Lactylation of PKM2 suppresses inflammatory metabolic adaptation in pro‐inflammatory macrophages. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(16):6210‐6225. 10.7150/ijbs.75434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wu X. In‐depth discovery of protein lactylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Proteomics. 2023;23(9):e2300003. 10.1002/pmic.202300003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sundén‐Cullberg J, Norrby‐Teglund A, Rouhiainen A, et al. Persistent elevation of high mobility group box‐1 protein (HMGB1) in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(3):564‐573. 10.1097/01.ccm.0000155991.88802.4d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ma K, Zhang Y, Hao J, Zhao J, Qi Y, Liu C. Correlation analysis of systemic immune inflammatory index, serum IL‐35 and HMGB‐1 with the severity and prognosis of sepsis. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(2):497‐501. 10.12669/pjms.39.2.6651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Yang K, Fan M, Wang X, et al. Lactate promotes macrophage HMGB1 lactylation, acetylation, and exosomal release in polymicrobial sepsis. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(1):133‐146. 10.1038/s41418-021-00841-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Yang L, Xie M, Yang M, et al. PKM2 regulates the Warburg effect and promotes HMGB1 release in sepsis. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4436. 10.1038/ncomms5436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Liu X, Cooper DE, Cluntun AA, et al. Acetate production from glucose and coupling to mitochondrial metabolism in mammals. Cell. 2018;175(2):502‐513. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Brooks GA. The science and translation of lactate shuttle theory. Cell Metab. 2018;27(4):757‐785. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dai X, Lv X, Thompson EW, Ostrikov K. Histone lactylation: epigenetic mark of glycolytic switch. Trends Genet. 2022;38(2):124‐127. 10.1016/j.tig.2021.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ogryzko VV, Schiltz RL, Russanova V, Howard BH, Nakatani Y. The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell. 1996;87(5):953‐959. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)82001-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Moreno‐Yruela C, Zhang D, Wei W, et al. Class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1‐3) are histone lysine delactylases. Sci Adv. 2022;8(3):eabi6696. 10.1126/sciadv.abi6696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tan C, Gu J, Li T, et al. Inhibition of aerobic glycolysis alleviates sepsis‑induced acute kidney injury by promoting lactate/sirtuin 3/AMPK‑regulated autophagy. Int J Mol Med. 2021;47(3):19. 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Chen C, Zhou Y, Ning X, et al. Directly targeting ASC by lonidamine alleviates inflammasome‐driven diseases. J Neuroinflammation. 2022;19(1):315. 10.1186/s12974-022-02682-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Song G, Lu Q, Fan H, et al. Inhibition of hexokinases holds potential as treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):87. 10.1186/s13075-019-1865-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Xingyue L, Shuang L, Qiang W, Jinjuan F, Yongjian Y. Chrysin ameliorates sepsis‐induced cardiac dysfunction through upregulating Nfr2/heme oxygenase 1 pathway. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2021;77(4):491‐500. 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Koc F, Tekeli MY, Kanbur M, Karayigit MÖ, Liman BC. The effects of chrysin on lipopolysaccharide‐induced sepsis in rats. J Food Biochem. 2020;44(9):e13359. 10.1111/jfbc.13359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Shi B, Chen M, Xia Z, et al. Genistein attenuates neuroinflammation and oxidative stress and improves cognitive impairment in a rat model of sepsis‐associated encephalopathy: potential role of the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Metab Brain Dis. 2023;38(1):339‐347. 10.1007/s11011-022-01076-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Yi L, Chang M, Zhao Q, et al. Genistein‐3'‐sodium sulphonate protects against lipopolysaccharide‐induced lung vascular endothelial cell apoptosis and acute lung injury via BCL‐2 signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(1):1022‐1035. 10.1111/jcmm.14815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Shang L, Liu Y, Li J, Pan G, Zhou F, Yang S. Emodin protects sepsis associated damage to the intestinal mucosal barrier through the VDR/Nrf2/HO‐1 pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:724511. 10.3389/fphar.2021.724511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Dai S, Ye B, Chen L, Hong G, Zhao G, Lu Z. Emodin alleviates LPS‐induced myocardial injury through inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Phytother Res. 2021;35(9):5203‐5213. 10.1002/ptr.7191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhang YY, Liu X, Zhang X, Zhang J. Shikonin improve sepsis‐induced lung injury via regulation of miRNA‐140‐5p/TLR4‐a vitro and vivo study. J Cell Biochem. 2020;121(3):2103‐2117. 10.1002/jcb.28199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Peng Y, Li Y, Li H, Yu J. Shikonin attenuates kidney tubular epithelial cells apoptosis, oxidative stress, and inflammatory response through nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase 4/PTEN pathway in acute kidney injury of sepsis model. Drug Dev Res. 2022;83(5):1111‐1124. 10.1002/ddr.21936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Guo T, Jiang ZB, Tong ZY, Zhou Y, Chai XP, Xiao XZ. Shikonin ameliorates LPS‐induced cardiac dysfunction by SIRT1‐dependent inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome. Front Physiol. 2020;11:570441. 10.3389/fphys.2020.570441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Luo P, Zhang Q, Zhong TY, et al. Celastrol mitigates inflammation in sepsis by inhibiting the PKM2‐dependent Warburg effect. Mil Med Res. 2022;9(1):22. 10.1186/s40779-022-00381-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Liao ST, Han C, Xu DQ, Fu XW, Wang JS, Kong LY. 4‐Octyl itaconate inhibits aerobic glycolysis by targeting GAPDH to exert anti‐inflammatory effects. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5091. 10.1038/s41467-019-13078-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Zhuang H, Lv Q, Zhong C, et al. Tiliroside ameliorates ulcerative colitis by restoring the M1/M2 macrophage balance via the HIF‐1α/glycolysis pathway. Front Immunol. 2021;12:649463. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.649463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Luo Y, Li L, Chen X, Gou H, Yan K, Xu Y. Effects of lactate in immunosuppression and inflammation: progress and prospects. Int Rev Immunol. 2022;41(1):19‐29. 10.1080/08830185.2021.1974856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Immunity, Inflammation and Disease are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES