To the Editor—International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) criteria, recently published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, include important revisions to the microbiological aspects of the diagnostic criteria for infective endocarditis (IE) [1]. The revised criteria provide useful simplifications for the interpretation of blood culture results in relation to whether a bacteremia constitutes a major or a minor Duke–ISCVID criterion [1–3]. The most significant change, however, is that a number of pathogens have been added to the list of “microorganisms that commonly cause IE.” For such pathogens, 2 positive blood cultures are sufficient to be regarded as a major Duke–ISCVID criterion. The inclusion of an increased number of microorganisms that commonly cause IE is claimed to increase the sensitivity of the criteria [4], but this remains to be proven for most pathogens. Moreover, the reclassification will likely decrease the specificity of the Duke–ISCVID criteria, resulting in an increased number of possible IE cases.
Whereas several bacterial species that can cause IE, such as Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus agalactiae, Abiotrophia, Granulicatella, and Gemella, have been “upgraded” to microorganisms that commonly cause IE, Aerococcus spp. are not regarded as common causes of IE. Thus, 3 positive blood cultures for Aerococcus spp. are needed to fulfill the major microbiology criterion [1].
IE caused by Aerococcus was described in 1991 [5]. However, it was only after the introduction of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for species determination of bacteria that Aerococcus urinae was found to be a relatively common IE-causing organism [6, 7]. Most reports on A. urinae IE have been case reports, but some larger case studies have also been published [5, 8]. From published cases, it is clear that A. urinae IE affects older men with underlying urinary tract pathology [9].
Aerococcus urinae can evidently cause IE, but does that make it a microorganism that commonly causes IE? In Table 1, the percentage of patients with bacteremia that have IE is shown, comparing the new common IE pathogens in the Duke-ISCVID criteria and A. urinae. Many studies were performed in different settings and with different methodologies, hampering direct comparisons. However, some studies evaluated the risk for IE with several pathogens, making comparisons more accurate; these are presented in the 4 right-hand columns of Table 1.
Table 1.
Proportion of Patients With Infective Endocarditis (IE) Among Patients With Bacteremia With Aerococcus urinae and Typical IE Pathogens According to Duke–International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases
Pathogen | Studies On Single Species | Studies Comparing Different Species | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IE (%) | Reference | IE (%) [10] | IE (%) [11] | IE (%) [12]a | IE (%) [13] | |
Aerococcus urinae | 2.6, 10, 18, 19; 35% | [5, 7, 14–16] | … | 5.4% | … | … |
Abiotrophia defectiva | … | … | 45% | 21% | … | … |
Gemella | … | … | 4.0% | 6.4% | … | … |
Granulicatella | … | … | 17% | 6.7% | 12% | … |
Staphylococcus lugdunensis | 6.3, 6.8; 46% | [17–19] | … | … | … | … |
Streptococcus agalactiae | 5.0% | [20] | … | … | 9.1% | 6.0% |
Streptococcus dysgalactiae | 0.9, 1.0; 1.4% | [21–23] | … | … | 6.4% | 0% |
Abbreviation: IE, infective endocarditis.
This is the only study in which an IE diagnosis was determined using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes only. It is referred to in the 2023 Duke–International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases criteria [1].
We believe that the available evidence suggests that A. urinae has a similar propensity to cause IE compared with most bacterial species regarded as microorganisms that commonly cause IE according to the Duke–ISCVID criteria [1]. The same article quoted in the Duke–ISCVID criteria [1] to justify the inclusion of Abitrophia, Granulicatella, and Gemella as common IE pathogen shows that A. urinae should be placed in the same category of pathogens [11]. The risk for IE in bacteremia with A. urinae is likely significantly higher than the risk for IE in S. dysgalactiae bacteremia (Table 1). We suggest that A. urinae be given the same status as the other microorganisms that commonly cause IE in the next revision of the Duke–ISCVID criteria.
Contributor Information
Torgny Sunnerhagen, Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Infection Control and Prevention, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Erik Senneby, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Infection Control and Prevention, Office for Medical Services, Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden; Clinical Microbiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Magnus Rasmussen, Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Division for Infectious Diseases, Skåne University Hospital Lund, Sweden.
References
- 1. Fowler VG, Durack DT, Selton-Suty C, et al. The 2023 Duke–International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases criteria for infective endocarditis: updating the modified Duke criteria. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 77:518–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK; Duke Endocarditis Service . New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Am J Med 1994; 96:200–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30:633–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Dahl A, Fowler VG, Miro JM, Bruun NE. Sign of the times: updating infective endocarditis diagnostic criteria to recognize Enterococcus faecalis as a typical endocarditis bacterium. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 75:1097–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Christensen JJ, Gutschik E, Friis-Moller A, Korner B. Urosepticemia and fatal endocarditis caused by Aerococcus-like organisms. Scand J Infect Dis 1991; 23:717–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Senneby E, Nilson B, Petersson AC, Rasmussen M. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry is a sensitive and specific method for identification of aerococci. J Clin Microbiol 2013; 51:1303–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Senneby E, Goransson L, Weiber S, Rasmussen M. A population-based study of aerococcal bacteraemia in the MALDI-TOF MS-era. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2016; 35:755–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sunnerhagen T, Nilson B, Olaison L, Rasmussen M. Clinical and microbiological features of infective endocarditis caused by aerococci. Infection 2016; 44:167–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rasmussen M. Aerococcus: an increasingly acknowledged human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Infect 2016; 22:22–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chesdachai S, Yetmar ZA, Tabaja H, et al. Contemporary experience of Abiotrophia, Granulicatella and Gemella bacteremia. J Infect 2022; 84:511–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Berge A, Kronberg K, Sunnerhagen T, Nilson BHK, Giske CG, Rasmussen M. Risk for endocarditis in bacteremia with Streptococcus-like bacteria: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019; 6:ofz437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Chamat-Hedemand S, Dahl A, Ostergaard L, et al. Prevalence of infective endocarditis in streptococcal bloodstream infections is dependent on streptococcal species. Circulation 2020; 142:720–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Park JH, Jung J, Kim MJ, et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis bacteremia in a tertiary hospital: comparison with S. agalactiae bacteremia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 38:2253–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Senneby E, Petersson AC, Rasmussen M. Clinical and microbiological features of bacteraemia with Aerococcus urinae. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18:546–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sihvonen R, Turunen M, Lehtola L, et al. Clinical and microbiological characterization of Aerococcus urinae bacteraemias at Helsinki metropolitan area, Finland. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 41:751–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tai DBG, Go JR, Fida M, Saleh OA. Management and treatment of Aerococcus bacteremia and endocarditis. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 102:584–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Non LR, Santos CA. The occurrence of infective endocarditis with Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia: a retrospective cohort study and systematic review. J Infect 2017; 74:179–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zinkernagel AS, Zinkernagel MS, Elzi MV, et al. Significance of Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia: report of 28 cases and review of the literature. Infection 2008; 36:314–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Choi S-H, Chung J-W, Lee EJ, et al. Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48:3346–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Vasikasin V, Changpradub D. Clinical manifestations and prognostic factors for Streptococcus agalactiae bacteremia among nonpregnant adults in Thailand. J Infect Chemother 2021; 27:967–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Trell K, Sendi P, Rasmussen M. Recurrent bacteremia with Streptococcus dysgalactiae: a case-control study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2016; 85:121–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Nevanlinna V, Huttunen R, Aittoniemi J, Luukkaala T, Rantala S. Incidence, seasonal pattern, and clinical manifestations of Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis bacteremia; a population-based study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2023; 42:819–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bläckberg A, Lundberg K, Svedevall S, Nilson B, Rasmussen M. Time to positivity of blood cultures in bloodstream infections with Streptococcus dysgalactiae and association with outcome. Infect Dis (Lond) 2023; 55:333–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]