Abstract
Introduction
Exercise is an effective component in rehabilitation of a range of chronic conditions. There is a growing interest in the use of exercise-based nature interacted rehabilitation (EBNIR), but an overview of current evidence is missing. The objective of this scoping review was to map existing exercise-based rehabilitation interventions conducted with incidental or intentional nature interaction focusing on its populations, types of outcomes, and theoretical rationale for people with physical and mental disabilities.
Methods
This scoping review identified peer-reviewed publications, registered upcoming trials and grey literature. To map all available knowledge, a comprehensive search of selected databases (MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; Cochrane; Web of Science; Pedro) from inception to October 2022. Data were synthesized in a thematic presentation guided by TIDieR, supplemented by a checklist developed for this study accounting nature incidental or intentional interaction.
Results
Twelve studies including 856 participants met the inclusion criteria. Eleven were completed trials and one was registered in clinicaltrials.gov to be run in 2023. A total of 856 patients were enrolled in the 12 studies (range 18–262, median 50). The included studies had great variation. The incidental or intentional interacted exercise-based interventions consisted of outdoor walks, neck exercises and surfing interventions in patients with physical or mental health conditions.
Conclusions
This scoping review presents an overview of limited and diverse evidence within the field of EBNIR, in patients with physical or mental health conditions. Our review provides an overview that will be helpful in the design of future EBNIR trials.
Keywords: Exercise, rehabilitation, nature interaction, incidental or intentional interacting, scoping review
Introduction
Exercise as part of health prevention, treatment and rehabilitation is supported by extensive research [1–3]. A low level of physical activity is a well-known risk factor for 35 chronic conditions [4]. Targeted exercise and physical activity is an internationally recommended treatment of 26 chronic conditions such as coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, musculoskeletal conditions and depression, as well as being effective in increasing life expectancy having a positive effect on key patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life [5,6]. Exercise-based rehabilitation is an umbrella term covering all types of exercise training and physical activity interventions [5] with the aim to enhance physical and mental function, activities (including behaviour), participation (including quality of life), for patients with any kind of medical disability [7]. An exercise-based rehabilitation intervention is defined as an intervention delivered multiple times with a predetermined aim and possible descriptions of activities performed, environment, individual or group, number of sessions, period of time, duration, intensity, dose, etc. [5]. Exercise-based rehabilitation is primarily carried out in healthcare facilities, which may not always satisfy the needs and preferences of patients [8,9]. Indoor exercise-based interventions are a central part of treatment or rehabilitation across many patient groups, and the use of alternative delivery models has emerged over the last decade. New exercise settings are continuously emerging to boost uptake and participation in exercise-based rehabilitation [10].
The utilization of outdoor and nature settings in rehabilitation has gained more attention in recent years [11]. Rehabilitation interacting with nature is different from traditional rehabilitation as it takes place in and with the outdoor nature environment, like in parks, urban green spaces, gardens and playgrounds, as well as woods and forests, rural and agricultural land, freshwater and inland water, marine and coastal locations, caves and deserts [12,13]. The outdoor nature environment is believed to have therapeutic and restorative effects in itself [14]. Nature-interacted interventions, where nature elements interact with the intervention, are thought to have an even greater rehabilitative effect [15,16] and have been thought to raise adherence to treatment and quality of life [17,18]. Nature-interacted interventions, where the natural environment is significantly interacting with the intervention, are therefore often used in mental health rehabilitation [19,20]. Interactions with nature elements can be fully or partially divided into indirect, incidental or intentional interactions [21,22]. The indirect use of nature elements is often used in exercise-based rehabilitation indoors, where video monitors or even virtual reality glasses, showing waterfalls, forests or mountain tracks, provide a visual nature stage for treadmill runners or stationary bicycles users [23–25]. The incidental interaction between nature and exercise-based rehabilitation occurs when patients are doing physical exercises that often or normally are taking place in indoor rehabilitation facilities, but is moved outdoors. Intentional interactions are activities are defined as such when the patient engages with nature with the intention of doing so, such as climbing hills, gardening, cycling or hiking in selected facilitating or enhancing outdoor surroundings [22].
Nature interacted interventions and their rationale are gradually being adapted into healthcare services and everyday rehabilitation programs by occupational therapists, social workers and psychologists [26–28], in mental, cognitive and behavioural nature-interacting rehabilitation programs [16,29–31]. A similar trend is emerging in exercise-based rehabilitation [10], and the interest for exercise-based interventions incidental or intentional interacted with nature has increased among healthcare providers, landscape designers and planners [32,33]. Yet there is no overview of existing knowledge on prior interventions, populations, outcomes and theoretical rationales [34]. In order to provide an informed base for future work within this field of existing exercise-based rehabilitation interacted with nature, the goal of this scoping review was to map the exercise-based nature interacted rehabilitation (EBNIR), focusing on its interventions, populations, outcome assessments and theoretical rationales for people with physical or mental health conditions.
Methods
The updated PRISMA-ScR for the conduct of scoping reviews provided direction for the review process [35]. For details of the pre-registered study protocol, see Open Science Frameworks: https://osf.io/2ck9h/. The study did not have any direct involvement of animals or human participants; therefore there was no need for ethical approval.
The review was conducted by an interdisciplinary author team with research and clinical backgrounds in physiotherapy and human physiology.
Search strategy
Through preliminary searches, a thorough search strategy was created inspired by previous review articles [34], and improved using synonyms and MeSH/subject headings. The search strategy was developed for MEDLINE and customized for EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane, Pedro and Web of Science. If possible, all terms were searched as keywords and text words in title and abstract. In addition, grey literature and citation search using articles to find additional material were done in a bidirectional manner [36]. The search strategy for grey literature was conducted in parallel with that for the peer-reviewed literature in Google Scholar using phrase search including words from the matrix [37]. The seven electronic databases were searched on 17–20 October 2022. For further details on search terms for each database, see supplementary material (Supplementary Appendix A, Search Strategy).
Eligibility criteria
The following inclusion criteria formed the search and identification of relevant sources:
Study population: Patients, with no restrictions towards specific diagnoses.
Concept/phenomena of interest: Intervention/exposure: A structured exercise-based rehabilitation intervention, incidental or intentional interaction with nature. Studies combining an exercise-based rehabilitation with other interventions were included.
Structured exercise-based intervention is defined as an intervention over delivered multiple times with a predetermined aim and intervention program as well as possible descriptions of activities performed, environment, individual/groups, number of sessions, period of time, duration, intensity, dose, etc. The incidental or intentional interaction between nature and the intervention is given when the activity or the goal of the intervention is motivated or guided by nature. Incidental interactions occur when the intervention is physically present in nature for a reason, but without further interweaving between the nature elements and the intervention, as e.g. when lying back exercises for low back pain patients have moved out onto the grass to enjoy the sun, birdsong and the smell of the flowers. Intentional interactions are those in which the intervention has intent to interact with nature and the nature guides and inspires the intervention, as e.g. when the forest paths are chosen for their level differences that are facilitating for the cardiac rehabilitation, or the stones are used as balance step stones, or strengthening elements in shoulder exercises. Rationale for nature interaction intervention must be described.
Source of evidence: Trials using either a qualitative (e.g. focus group interviews) and/or quantitative research (e.g. randomized controlled trial, quasi RCT, pre-post study) design. Opinion pieces, reviews, editorials, conference proceedings or similar, and publication of abstract only were excluded.
No publication date restriction was applied.
Source of evidence: Peer-reviewed articles and ongoing registered trials, written in English, Danish, Swedish, Italian or Norwegian. Studies were included if reported in one of these languages.
Selecting evidence
The search results were transferred to COVIDENCE for management and abstract screening, and any duplicate studies were removed. Two review authors (HB, JA) separately performed an initial screening of titles and abstracts in accordance with the eligibility criteria. If the inclusion of an article was unclear, the reviewers (HB, JA) screened the full text; in case of discrepancies, consensus was reached by discussion. In the second independent screening, two reviewers (HB, JA) read full-text versions of identified articles to assess their final inclusion. Once more, agreement was obtained through discussion.
Critical appraisal
Since this is a scoping review, we did not perform a critical appraisal of the included studies, in line with the PRISMA-ScR guidance for conducting scoping reviews [35].
Extracting evidence
Data were extracted by two reviewers (HB, JA), using a template adapted from PRISMA-ScR [35], and the data extraction regarding intervention/exposure was guided by the TIDieR checklist [38] (see Table 1). An additional extraction list was made to account for all outdoor and natural environments in the intervention extraction that were not covered by the TIDieR checklist; this extraction list was made in collaboration with an expert panel consisting of people with experience in developing and delivering nature interacted interventions. Data of specific interest in relation to the intervention were: rationale and the theoretical framework for using nature environment, location properties, and if the intervention was incidental or intentional interacted with the nature environment. Supplementary Appendix 2 shows the data-extraction form, which first included the TIDieR checklist and second the additional checklist for the specific nature and environment interaction information.
Table 1.
Data extraction template.
| Citation details, country of origin (where study was conducted) |
| Publication type |
| Study design |
| Inclusion criteria |
| Recruitment method |
| Participants (number, gender, age, comorbidities, etc.) |
| Intervention (incl. nature exposure and control conditions if any) |
| Duration of the interventions |
| Outcomes (quantitatively or qualitatively assessed) |
Data were recorded in Excel and entries were cross-checked by the two reviewers (HB and JA) for consistency and accuracy.
Analysis and presentation of results
As described in the methodological guidance for scoping reviews [35], the first author (HB) examined the information and compiled it into a thematic descriptive presentation of the findings and the second reviewer (JA) crosschecked the content. This involved close reading and re-reading of the included papers.
Results
Identification of potential articles
The systematic search in the seven databases revealed 4733 potentially relevant titles/abstracts. No additional papers were found via chain search or search in grey literature [39]. In total, 2022 titles/abstracts were screened after removal of duplicates. One thousand nine hundred and fifty-four articles were excluded. Subsequently, 68 full-text articles were screened for eligibility of which 56 were excluded. Accordingly, a total of 12 papers were included. For further details, see flowchart (see Figure 1) [40].
Figure 1.
Flowchart of search procedures and study selection. *Records were excluded by human. From: Moher et al. [40].
Identification of potential articles
Twelve papers met the inclusion criteria [41–52]. Table 2 presents the summary of findings, Table 3 lists the key features of the trials and participants, Table 4 summarizes the interventions, Table 5 contains the theoretical rationale and Table 6 shows the characteristics of used outcomes in the included papers (n = 12).
Table 2.
Summary of findings.
| Study | Intervention comparator | Incidental or intentional interaction with nature | Participants | Dosage/frequency | Study design | Primary outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frühauf et al. Austria [41] |
Nordic walking Sitting indoor or ergometer cycling |
Incidental interaction | Mild to moderate depression (n = 22) | 60-min sessions | A within-subjects experimental study | Feeling Scale Felt Arousal Scale Pre and post treatment. |
| Gibbs et al. United Kingdom [42] |
Surfing activities No comparator |
Intentional interaction | Acquired brain injury (n = 18) | 1 two-hour session per week in 5 weeks | A qualitative evaluation design | Semi-structured interviews The interviews were conducted after the intervention. |
| Huber et al. Austria [43] |
Hiking in the mountains Mountain hiking plus balneotherapy or balneotherapy alone. |
Intentional interaction | Low back pain (n = 80) | 5 h hiking 5 days in a row | A randomized controlled clinical trial with three arms | The Back Performance Scale, The Spine-Check Score MediMouse Pre and post treatment + 4 months follow-up |
| Kang et al. South Korea [44] |
Forest bathing with neck-exercise Forest bathing alone |
Incidental interaction | Posterior neck pain (n = 64) | Forest bathing + 4 h stretch and exercise. 5 days in a row | Comparative intervention study | Neck Disability Index and Visual Analogue Scale pain. On the first day and last day of the experiment |
| Liu-Ambrose Canada [52] |
Outdoor walk or jog Indoor treadmill walking |
Incidental interaction | Mild cognitive impairment (n = 68) | 3 times per week for 12 weeks | Randomized controlled trial | Motor function Pre and post treatment + 3 months follow-up |
| López-Pousa et al. Spain [45] |
1.25 km walks 1.25 km walks |
Intentional interaction | Fibromyalgia (n = 34) | 1.25 km walks between 5 and 6 pm for 6 days | A randomized single-blind clinical trial of two groups | Blood pressure, heart rate Pre and post each walk |
| Miller et al. USA [46] |
Outdoor walking Indoors walking |
Incidental interaction |
Adolescent and young adult survivors of any cancer (n = 19) | Outdoor walking 30–50 min, 4 times in total. |
A randomized cross-over group pilot trial | Physical activity measured by ActiGraph Baseline, 2 weeks after the first two exercise sessions, and 2 weeks after the last two exercise sessions. |
| Noushad et al. Pakistan [47] |
Walk Sit‐in nature |
Intentional interaction | Post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 262) | 502) t walk session. 5 times per week (total 12 weeks; 3 months) |
Randomized control trial | Traumatic Stress Scale Baseline and 3 month follow-up |
| Serrat et al. Spain [48] |
Nordic walking Indoor Nordic walking |
Intentional interaction | Fibromyalgia (n = 169) | 12 weeks. Once a week. 2 h duration | A pragmatic randomized controlled trial | The fibromyalgia impact questionnaire Baseline, 6 weeks (half-way) and post-treatment |
| Song et al. Japan [49] |
Forest walk City walk |
Intentional interaction | Hypertension (n = 20) | One walk each place, about 17 min, for two consecutive days | A within-subject experimental intervention pilot Study | Heart rate variability and heart rate 1-min intervals measures over the entire 17-min course |
| van den Berg and Beute The Netherlands [50] |
Walk and talk No comparator |
Intentional interaction | Burnout/stress (n = 40) | Four individually guided walks of 1.5 h | A mixed method quasi-experimental design with a control group | The emotional exhaustion and distance scales of the Utrecht Burnout Scale. Before first walk, after second walk and after therapy. |
| Wen et al. China [51] |
Outdoor-assisted walking training Indoor function training |
Incidental interaction | Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (N = 60) | 15 min twice a day for four weeks | A randomized controlled trial | Forced expiratory volume in 1 s pre and post treatment |
Table 3.
Characteristics of the included studies and participants.
| Acute effects of outdoor physical activity on affect and psychological well-being in depressed patients. A preliminary study | |
| Frühauf et al. Austria [41] | Peer-review A within-subjects experimental study (a preliminary study) |
| Mild to moderate depression (n = 22) 8 patients dropped out due to acute sickness (4), early release (2), incomplete questionnaires (1) or different disease pattern (1) and were therefore excluded from the data analyses. 14 included in the analysis. 6 male, 8 female. 32.7 ± 10.8 years Recruited during treatment in a mental health centre | |
| Riding the wave into wellbeing: a qualitative evaluation of surf therapy for individuals living with acquired brain injury | |
| Gibbs et al. United Kingdom [42] | Peer-review A qualitative evaluation design gathering details accounting for service users experiences of the surfability intervention |
| Acquired brain injury. 18 included 15 participated in the interviews. Age: mean = 42.4; standard deviation 12.88; age range (29–69 years); median = 38. male = 10; female = 5 (type: traumatic brain injury, n = 8; mild acquired brain injury, n = 1; pontine cavernoma bleed to the brain, n = 1; subarachnoid haemorrhage, n = 1; multiple sclerosis, n = 1) time since injury: mean = 2 years and 9 months; standard deviation = 3.07; range = 6 months to 12 years; median = 2 years Employment status: employed n = 3; employed but on sickness leave; n = 2; medically retired n = 3; unemployed n = 7. As part of their ongoing treatment and rehabilitation, patients were invited to attend one of three Surfability interventions | |
| Green exercise and Mg–Ca–SO4 thermal balneotherapy for the treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial | |
| Huber et al. Austria [43] |
Peer-review A randomized controlled clinical trial with three arms |
| Low back pain (LBP) patients (n = 80) 19–65 years old. 35 men, 45 women The participants were recruited all over Austria through communication via the Wasser Tirol web page, advertisements in newspapers, and by physicians. | |
| Relief of chronic posterior neck pain depending on the type of forest therapy: comparison of the therapeutic effect of forest bathing alone versus forest bathing with exercise | |
| Kang et al. South Korea [44] |
Peer-review Comparative intervention study |
| Posterior neck pain (more than VAS 4, lasted for more than 3 months) (n = 64) Age: forest bathing with exercises: 54.8 ± 9.78. Forest bathing: 50.0 ± 14.93 11 male, 53 female Visitors at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Hanyang University Medical Center in May 2013 whom met certain inclusion criteria were recruited through a notice in the hospital, by phone or by email | |
| Supporting aging through green exercise | |
| Liu-Ambrose Canada [52] |
Online register of planned trial Randomized controlled trial |
| Mild cognitive impairment (n = 68) 65–80 years Recruitment method not described. | |
| Sense of well-being in patients with fibromyalgia: aerobic exercise program in a mature forest – a pilot study | |
| López-Pousa et al. Spain [45] |
Peer-review A randomized single-blind clinical trial of two groups |
| Fibromyalgia (n = 34 (4 dropouts)) Age: 62.3 years (SD = 7.7) 20–70 years old. All participants were women People with fibromyalgia, belonging to the Garrotxa Association of Chronic Fatigue and Fibromyalgia were invited to participate | |
| Cancer survivors exercise at higher intensity in outdoor settings: the GECCOS trial | |
| Miller et al. USA [46] |
Peer-review A randomized cross-over group pilot trial |
| Adolescent and young adult survivors of any cancer (n = 19) Age: 19.7 (13.3–27.6). 9 male, 10 female. Participants recruited from the University of Minnesota Childhood Cancer Survivor Program Research Database and from survivors receiving follow-up care at the University of Minnesota Masonic Children’s Hospital and Masonic Cancer Center Clinic. Eligible survivors were invited through mailings, emails and phone calls | |
| Effect of nature‐based physical activity on post‐traumatic growth among healthcare providers with post‐traumatic stress | |
| Noushad et al. Pakistan [47] |
Peer-reviewed Randomized control trial |
| Patients with a traumatic event in the last 12 months (n = 262) Age: walking group: 33.14 ± 9.45 (SD). Sitting group: 32.41 ± 9.84 (SD) Male: 129 (58 walking, 71 sitting) Female: 133 (73 walking, 60 sitting) Participants were recruited from five tertiary health care facilities based in Karachi, Pakistan. Participants were invited to the study through advertisements on the notice board of each centre | |
| Effectiveness of a multicomponent treatment for fibromyalgia based on pain neuroscience education, exercise therapy, psychological support and nature exposure (NAT-FM): a pragmatic randomized controlled trial | |
| Serrat et al. Spain [48] |
Peer-review A pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
| Fibromyalgia (n = 169) Age: TAU + NAT-FM-group: 54.12 (8.62), TAU: 53.15 (9.06) Sex: TAU + NAT-FM- group: 1 male, 81 female , TAU-group: 85 female Patients visited consecutively by the physical therapist of the Central Sensitivity Syndromes Unit (CSSU) at the Vall d’Hebron University Hospital (Barcelona, Spain) were recruited from November to December 2020 | |
| Effect of forest walking on autonomic nervous system activity in middle-aged hypertensive individuals: a pilot study | |
| Song et al. Japan [49] |
Peer-review A within-subject experimental intervention Pilot Study |
| Hypertension (n = 20) (5 had a high-normal blood pressure (systolic 130–139 mmHg or diastolic 85–89 mmHg), 10 had hypertension stage 1 (systolic 140–159 mmHg or diastolic 90–99 mmHg), 5 had hypertension stage 2 (systolic 160–179 mmHg or diastolic 100–109 mmHg)) Mean age, 58.0 ± 10.6 years; Male 20, female: 0 Recruitment method not mentioned | |
| Walk it off! The effectiveness of walk and talk coaching in nature for individuals with burnout- and stress-related complaints | |
| van den Berg and Beute The Netherlands [50] |
Peer-review A mixed method quasi-experimental design with a control group |
| Burnout/stress (n = 40) Age: intervention group 42.05 (SD 1.85), control group: 44.00 (SD 2.55). 9 male, 31 female Participants who registered for a walk and talk coaching program called ‘discover your talent’ were invited to participate in the study | |
| Effect of a rehabilitation garden on rehabilitation efficacy in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | |
| Wen et al. China [51] |
Peer-review A randomized controlled trial |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (N = 60) Age: intervention 63.74 ± 3.24, control: 64.10 ± 3.56, male 29, female 31 (intervention 14/16, control: 15/15) Recruitment method not described | |
Table 4.
Data extraction of interventions.
| Study | Intervention | Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| Frühauf et al. Austria [41] |
Walking outdoors using the Nordic walking technique 60-min sessions. One for each condition All conditions (60 min each) were carried out as a group. Provided face to face by physiotherapists |
Sitting indoor or cycle on a cycle ergometer |
| Gibbs et al. United Kingdom [42] |
Surfing activities Face to face In groups of no more than 5 participants Groups were led by three qualified surf instructors, two staff therapists plus volunteers One two-hour sessions per week in five weeks |
No comparison |
| Huber et al. Austria [43] |
Hiking tours in the mountains Face to face in groups about 10 physiotherapeutic executed the treatments From Sunday to Friday: a daily 5 h guided hiking tours from 6.92 to 15.20 and a total of 60.93 km, via various elevations gains in terrain above sea level |
Same as intervention group plus balneotherapy or balneotherapy alone. The baths in a tub lasted 20 min every afternoon Face to face in groups about 10 physiotherapeutic executed the treatments From Sunday to Friday: a daily 5 h guided hiking tours from 6.92 to 15.20 and a total of 60.93 km, via various elevation gains in terrain above sea level |
| Kang et al. South Korea [44] |
Forest bathing with neck-exercise (FBE) 2 + 2 h a day The FBE programme: 10-minute warm-up, 30 min of main exercise and a 10-minute cool down. Subjects rest for 10 min and then repeat the exercise programme, so the total exercise time is 2 h. The warm-up exercise: light stretching; the cervical and shoulder regions and the whole body were included. The main exercise: intensity gradually increased. Stretching exercises focusing on the cervical and shoulder regions. Although the cool down exercise is composed of only stretching, the intensity is higher than that of the main exercise This exercise program was developed and organized by a committee composed of four physicians specializing in rehabilitation medicine, and three physical therapists after a literature review Five days in a row |
Forest bathing alone 2 times 2 h a day in the same forest as the intervention group |
| Liu-Ambrose Canada [52] |
Outdoor walk or jog on forest trails at pre-determined route in trails of an urban forest (Pacific Spirit Park) Each session will consist of 10 min of warm-up, 40 min of aerobic exercise, and 10 min of cool-down. For both OP and IP, aerobic exercise will be progressive and of moderate intensity Group-based training face-to-face by instructors with a relevant background and first aid certification. Both OP and IP training groups will have a participant to instructor ratio of 3:1 A 12-week, 3x/week program |
60 min indoor treadmill walking at the Exercise Prescription Suite of the Centre for Hip Health and Mobility (CHHM) |
| López-Pousa et al. Spain [45] |
1.25 km walks in young forest The walks were performed through flat areas in these woods Delivered face-to-face accompanied by two nurses The walks were conducted in the evenings between 5 and 6 pm during six days |
1.25 km walks in mature forest The walks were performed through flat areas in these woods Delivered face-to-face accompanied by two nurses The walks were conducted in the evenings between 5 and 6 pm during six days |
| Miller et al. USA [46] |
Outdoor walking compared to indoor walking for 30–50 min for each session Four group exercise sessions two indoor sessions and two outdoor sessions Face-to-face in groups session included an introduction prior to the exercise. Participants were encouraged to socialize during the exercise and at a meal provided after each exercise session Two young adult survivors were hired as peer leaders for the group exercise sessions |
Indoors walking for 30–50 min for each session All indoor exercise sessions were completed in the tunnels and skyways at the University of Minnesota Face-to-face in groups session included an introduction prior to the exercise. Participants were encouraged to socialize during the exercise and at a meal provided after each exercise session Two young adult survivors were hired as peer leaders for the group exercise sessions |
| Noushad et al. Pakistan [47] |
A walkanet allt s Stretching exercise sessions 10 min, followed by a 50n, f walk: 5 km walk following a route with a track map at a moderate pace No personal guidance 5 times per week (total 12 weeks; 3 months). Compared to 3 months of 60 min nature-based sitting |
Sit na nature for 50 min No personal guidance 5 times per week (total 12 weeks; 3 months) |
| Serrat et al. Spain [48] |
The active group received exercise therapy (Nordic walking), pain neuroscience education, cognitive behavioural therapy, mindfulness training and nature exposure. All elements carried out in nature Provided face-to-face delivery in groups by a physiotherapist, a psychologist and a sports technician 12 weeks. Once a week. 2 h duration |
Exercise therapy (Nordic walking), pain neuroscience education, cognitive behavioural therapy, mindfulness training and nature exposure. All elements carried out indoors Provided face-to-face delivery in groups by a physiotherapist, a psychologist and a sports technician 12 weeks. Once a week. 2 h duration |
| Song et al. Japan [49] |
Forest walk After resting for 10 min, the participants were instructed to walk a predetermined course Face-to-face in groups. Two experimenters guided the participants along the course, at almost the same speed One walk each place, about 17 min, on two consecutive days |
City walk Face-to-face in groups. Two experimenters guided the participants along the course, at almost the same speed One walk each place, about 17 min, on two consecutive days |
| van den Berg and Beute The Netherlands [50] |
Walk and talk coaching trajectory consisting of four individually guided walks supplemented with individual assignments. Intervention: four individually guided walks, of 1.5 h followed by a coach. Coaches had no specific training for nature-based coaching The programme lasts between 12 and 18 weeks (1 walk per 3–4 weeks) |
No intervention |
| Wen et al. China [51] |
Outdoor-assisted walking training The training distance was 500 m per training, walking training barefooted on a cobblestone path with an uneven surface, outdoor stair training and horizontal bar training, including horizontal ladder movements, pull-ups, overhanging chest-expanding and left-lifting (according to their abilities). The training time was 15 min, and the exercise was performed twice daily Face-to-face in groups under the guidance of therapists at the Fifth People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China 15 min twice a day for four weeks |
Indoor function training for pulmonary rehabilitation including: aerobic exercise, i.e. indoor cycling ergometry (medium speed, rest for 1 min after every 4 min of exercise, 15 min/day); breathing exercises, namely abdominal breathing exercise, pursed lip breathing, chest breathing exercise and relaxation shoulder strap exercise repeated 10 times with each exercise; and (iii) cough training and resistance breath training for 15 min/day Face-to-face in groups under the guidance of therapists at the Fifth People’s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China 15 min twice a day for four weeks |
Table 5.
Rationale for interventions.
| Study | Intervention | Rationale for nature intervention | Considerations or arguments for the inclusion of nature elements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frühauf et al. Austria [41] |
Walking outdoors using the Nordic walking technique Mild to moderate depression (n = 22) The evidence shows that physical activity (PA) might be an effective treatment for depression and PA has been recommended as part of the latest guidelines on depression from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Can (PA) immediately improve affect and/or help an individual to feel more energetic |
Active exposure to natural environments elicits more positive effects on mental well-being and mood enhancing effects after PA in an outdoor environment than in an indoor setting is greater | Walking outdoor along a path outside the hospital area through a green, natural environment |
| Gibbs et al. United Kingdom [42] |
Surfing activities Acquired brain injury (ABI) (n = 18) Holistic neurorehabilitation considering the dynamic relationship between a person and the person’s environment, and respecting the reciprocal relationships that exist between psychological, social, cognitive and physical domains of well-being following injury The aim of this study is to characterize the experiences of a surfing intervention in individuals living with the residual effects of brain injury, and to reflect on potential mechanisms through which reported improvements in well-being may function in a conceptual model |
The attention restoration theory emphasizes the restorative effects of spending time in nature on attention and concentration which may be particularly useful for people with ABI Exposure to unthreatening natural environments help to reduce physiological arousal following stress and increase resilience, in line with stress reduction theory. The potential for nature to facilitate resilience may be particularly important in the context of brain injury populations. Nature can meaningfully reduce psychological and physiological markers of stress and replace them with feelings of refreshment and vigour Contact with nature has also been shown to improve cognitive functioning and facilitate the experience of psychological flow and there is now a growing body of evidence for the wellbeing benefits associated with engagement in water-based activities |
Surfability UK is located at Caswell Bay on the Gower Peninsula of South Wales The intervention ran during the latter months of each year (July–October 2018–2020) in accordance with the optimum sea temperature and seasonal weather conditions |
| Huber et al. Austria [43] |
Hiking tours in the mountains. Low back pain (LBP) patients (n = 80) Physical activity has proven effect in pain, muscle strength and quality of life in patients with LBP |
Restorative effects of spending time in nature on attention and concentration and pain relief Current evidence on green exercise refers to three main areas: regulation of immunological and physiological (stress) responses, improvement of psychological states, and facilitation of health-promoting behaviour Despite limited available data, there is encouraging evidence that balneo- or spa-therapy may be effective in the treatment of LBP |
The village of Grins (Tyrol, Austria, 47e villag″N 10° 30155.2″E) is chosen for the mountain tracks and climbs, air, and sight |
| Kang et al. South Korea [44] |
Forest bathing with neck-exercise Posterior neck pain (n = 64) It has been shown that stretching and strengthening exercises are helpful for relieving posterior neck pain |
Forest bathing was reported to have a positive impact on blood pressure and salivary cortisol level in elderly patients with hypertension, and therapeutic effects in patients with psychological problems such as anxiety, depression and stress. Forest bathing may ameliorate chronic posterior neck pain and showed significantly reduced pain in a forest bathing group compared with a group going about daily life in a city | A forest – no further description |
| Liu-Ambrose Canada [52] |
Outdoor walk or jog on forest trails Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (n = 68) Aerobic exercise is an evidence-based approach to mitigate cognitive decline in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) |
Spending time in nature has a positive effect on cognition and stress reduction | Forest trails at pre-determined route in trails of an urban forest (Pacific Spirit Park) |
| López-Pousa et al. Spain [45] |
1.25 km walks in young forest or mature forest Fibromyalgia (FM) (n = 34) Some physiological studies support the hypothesis that walking has positive effects on pain, quality of life and depression |
Studies support the hypothesis that walking in the woods supports the central nervous system, autonomic nervous system and endocrine system, increasing the immune response, affecting hypertension and positively influencing non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients People with FM performing moderate exercise in therapeutic forests exhibit a significant improvement in their clinical symptoms when compared with the same type of exercise in younger forests |
The two forests are located in the Garrotxa Volcanic Zone Natural Park, specifically between Olot and the beech forest in Jordà (Northeast of Girona, Spain) A young forest presents only first age classes species. Usually, it is a forest with a homogeneous dense or very dense structure and impenetrable undergrowth A mature forest: the absence of timber exploitation during at least the last 4 or 5 decades has allowed reaching a more advanced and complex structure, with a wider range of age groups, including old trees with a large diameter (usually over 100 years). The closure of the crowns of the trees causes little undergrowth. This composition allows a wide biodiversity and an ecosystem that includes many more types of lichens, fungi, mosses, invertebrates, and their predators, that is, all the flora and fauna in the natural evolution of a forest |
| Miller et al. USA [46] |
Outdoor walking compared to indoor walking for 30–50 min for each session Adolescent and young adult survivors of any cancer (n = 19) Survivors of childhood cancer report even less physical activity than sibling controls. Yet, regular exercise is protective against many chronic diseases and is associated with a lower risk of mortality, psychological burden and cognitive impairment in survivors. |
As a way to improve intervention effectiveness, interest has grown around the health and motivation benefits of performing physical activity outdoors: termed ‘Green Exercise’. In the general population, Green Exercise has been associated with increased intention to exercise and mental health benefits: decreases in tension or depression and increases in energy and self-esteem | All outdoor exercise sessions were completed at a large park in Minneapolis. No further description |
| Noushad et al. Pakistan [47] |
A walkanet alxerccompared to sitrcise sessi Patients with a traumatic event in the last 12 months (n = 262) Posttraumatic growth (PTG) is believed to improve individual physical health and benefit immune, nervous and other systems. PTG usually involves the development of personal functioning and wellimmune, nervous mental health benefits: decysical activity has become a realistic and safe therapy for trauma patients to improve psychological and somatic quality of life |
Mankind has utilized nature to cure or to deal with stress. Several studies have demonstrated a significant relationship between nature and healing from PTS. It has been suggested that the exposure to nature accounted for the reduction in cognitive fatigue and stress levels, increased focus, decline in adverse effects, decreased sympathetic nervous system activity, restored neurotrophins, reduced inflammation, etc., thus counted therapeutic to the trauma associated pathology. |
The safari park covers 148 acres (0.60 km2); it has a zoo geared with woodland, mountain viewing, safari tracks and two natural lakes The experiment took place in winters and spring with an average temperature between 22 °C and 25 °C |
| Serrat et al. Spain [48] |
The active group received exercise therapy (Nordic walking), pain neuroscience education, cognitive behavioural therapy, mindfulness training and nature exposure Fibromyalgia (FM) (n = 169) Education, mindfulness and cognitive behavioural therapy have shown good effect in FM patients with FM. |
Reason: therapeutic programmes based on activities in nature have shown promise for improving mental health. Likewise, it has been proposed that practice in a natural context could increase adherence to therapies based on the practice of physical activity. Components as hiking, Nordic walking and Shinrin Yoku are for outside | The geographical areas were Sant Genís Forest and Les Escletxes del Papiol, Barcelona, Spain The therapists are not educated in integrating nature in the interventions |
| Song et al. Japan [49] |
Forest walk compared to city walk Hypertension (n = 20) Studies have demonstrated that walking is beneficial for hypertension |
A forest environment can have positive physiological and psychological effects. When compared with an urban environment, viewing forest scenery or walking in forests can decrease cerebral blood flow in the prefrontal cortex, reduce blood pressure and pulse rate, increase parasympathetic nerve activity, suppress sympathetic nerve activity and decrease salivary cortisol concentrations of stress hormones. As interest in improving health and QOL has increased, more attention has been focused on the role of nature in promoting human health and well-being. In particular, a great deal of attention is focused on the therapeutic effects of the forest environment or ‘forest therapy’. Forest therapy uses the medically proven effects of walking in a forest and observing the environment to promote feelings of relaxation and improve both physical and mental health. | The forest walk was located in Agematsu town of Nagano Prefecture situated in central Japan. A forest including many Japanese cypress trees. The walking course in the forest area was mostly flat, except for a small slope An urban area in Ina City of Nagano Prefecture was selected as the control site. The urban walking area was flat The weather was sunny on the days of experiments. In the forest area, the average temperature was 21.4 °C ± 1.2 °C with an average humidity of 82.3 ± 4.8%, whereas in the urban area, the average temperature was 28.1 °C ± 1.1 °C with an average humidity of 61.9 ± 4.5% |
| van den Berg and Beute The Netherlands [50] |
Walk and talk coaching trajectory consists of guided walks supplemented with individual assignments compared to no intervention Burnout/stress (n = 40) During walk and talk coaching, clients are engaging in walking as a moderate physical activity. Physical activity – as opposed to sedentary behaviour – has been found positively related to mental health on its own. |
Natural environments can mitigate the detrimental effects of stress on mental health Exposure to natural environments has pronounced benefits for healthy individuals, but even more so for those suffering from mental health issues. |
At the country estate ‘Amelisweerd’ in the Netherlands The nature estate serves both as a natural background for the programme and as a metaphor and source of inspiration for discussing problems and challenges. For example, the coach may point at a tree that has fallen on the path and ask what the client would do if she or he would encounter such a situation in his or her life. Or use changes that come with the season, such as falling leaves, as a starting point for discussing how the client copes with the passing of time and getting older |
| Wen et al. China [51] |
Outdoor-assisted walking training versus indoor function training for pulmonary rehabilitation Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (N = 60) Pulmonary rehabilitation, stabilizing clinical symptoms and preventing disease progression is considered as one of the important treatments for patients with stage II and higher COPD |
A multidisciplinary combination of garden science, clinical medicine, and engineering, outdoor rehabilitation provides an adjuvant therapy | No further description |
Table 6.
Characteristics of outcome measures.
| Frühauf et al. Austria [41] |
Acute effects of outdoor physical activity on affect and psychological well-being in depressed patients. A preliminary study |
| Feeling Scale (FS) measuring affective valence. The FS is a single-item rating scale with anchors at zero (‘Neutral’) and at all odd integers, ranging from ‘Very good’ (+5) to ‘Very bad’ (–5) Felt Arousal Scale (FAS) measuring Perceived activation. A single-item rating scale ranges from 1 (‘low arousal’) to 6 (‘high arousal’) Mood Survey Scale (MSS) assesses mood states with 8 subscales (activation, elation, calmness, contemplativeness, excitation, anger, fatigue, depression) and consists of a total of 40 items answered in 5-point Likert-type scales Measurement points: pre-treatment and post treatment | |
| Gibbs et al. United Kingdom [42] |
Riding the wave into wellbeing: A qualitative evaluation of surf therapy for individuals living with acquired brain injury |
| Semi structured interviews were conducted face-to-face in a hospital setting in 12 patients and three were conducted via telephone by one of two assistant psychologists The interviews were conducted after the intervention | |
| Huber et al. Austria [43] |
Green exercise and Mg–Ca–SO4 thermal balneotherapy for the treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
| The functional spinal mobility was measured by parts of the Back Performance Scale, assessment of mobility-related activities in patients with back pain (maximum possible value per test: 3 points). Trunk rotation measurement measured sitting on a treatment bed with a digital goniometer Questionnaires: Oswestry Low Back Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36, modified Visual Analogue Scale, World Health Organization Well-Being Index In a pain diary, the use of pain medication was documented during the whole study period. Furthermore, the days of incapacity to work and the number of medical consultations due to cLBP in the last months were assessed. These three parameters were collected two times (day 0 and day 120) Measurement points: at the beginning and end of the one-week intervention, as well as 4 months after the intervention. Pain diary during the whole study period (4 months) | |
| Kang et al. South Korea [44] |
Relief of chronic posterior neck pain depending on the type of forest therapy: comparison of the therapeutic effect of forest bathing alone versus forest bathing with exercise |
| VAS on that day, VAS over the previous week, Neck Disability Index (NDI), EuroQol 5D-3L VAS (EQ VAS) and index (EQ index), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), the number of trigger points in the posterior neck region (TRPs), and C-ROM Measurement points: on the first day of the experiment and on the last day of the experiment. All tests were performed by the same physicians | |
| Liu-Ambrose Canada [52] |
Supporting aging through green exercise |
| Motor function, emotional well-being, health-related behaviours and quality of life Measurement points: at baseline and at trial completion. Follow-up measurement of questionnaire-based outcomes will occur via email or phone at 3 months following trial completion. Participants will also subjectively monitor workout intensity using the 20-point Borg’s Rating of Perceived Exertion | |
| López-Pousa et al. Spain [45] |
Sense of well-being in patients with fibromyalgia: aerobic exercise program in a mature forest – a pilot study |
| Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and temperature of the participants were determined at the beginning and end of each walk. The Spanish version of the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), Spanish version of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), questionnaire on the symptomatic progression of fibromyalgia during the last 15 days at the end of the trial, specifying the days of generalized discomfort, the days of intense pain, the presence of insomnia, and the number of days during which they experienced well-being. A questionnaire including a self-assessment of the study benefits composed of 9 items with a 0 (negative)–10 Measures relating to environmental conditions of the forests, such as temperature (in °C), luminosity (in lux), noise (in decibels) and atmospheric pressure (in hectopascals) were recorded 30 minutes prior to each session Blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and temperature of the participants were determined at the beginning and end of each walk. (FIQR) and (STAI) were administered on the first and last day of intervention | |
| Miller et al. USA [46] |
Cancer survivors exercise at higher intensity in outdoor settings: the GECCOS trial |
| Physical activity (PA) was measured using Actigraph GT3x accelerometers worn on the hip for 7 days at baseline, 2 weeks after the first two exercise sessions, and 2 weeks after the last two exercise sessions and during each exercise session The Psychological Need Satisfaction in Exercise (PNSE) is an 18-item validated survey that assesses the self-determination theory constructs of perceived autonomy, competence and relatedness. The Behaviour Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2) is a 19-item validated survey that assesses the self-determination theory construct of exercise motivation. The Fatigue Scale-Adolescent (FSA) is a 13-item validated survey to assess fatigue in patients and survivors of cancer Measurement points: PA, motivation and fatigue were measured three times throughout the study: before the first two sessions, after the first two sessions, and after the second two sessions | |
| Noushad et al. Pakistan [47] |
Effect of nature of a physical activity on postsical acti growth among healthcare providers with postwth among stress |
| Physiological measures (body mass index (BMI), heart rate (HR), diastolic and systolic blood pressure (SBP)), and biochemical measures (C reactive protein (CRP), BDNF, ILRP) cortisol and heart rate variability (HRV)). Traumatic Stress Scale (TSS) measures exposure to any trauma Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) a 21st Tr survey, including factors of new possibilities, relating to others, personal strength, spiritual change and appreciation of life Measurement points: baseline and 3 month follow-up | |
| Serrat et al. Spain [48] |
Effectiveness of a multicomponent treatment for fibromyalgia based on pain neuroscience education, exercise therapy, psychological support and nature exposure (NAT-FM): a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
| Primary outcome: The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised (FIQR) Secondary outcome: The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (both pain and fatigue), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the physical functioning component of the 36-item short form survey (SF-36), the positive affect and negative affect schedule (PANAS), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4) Process variables: The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Personal Perceived Competence Scale (PPCS) and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) Measurement points: baseline, 6 weeks (half-way) and post treatment | |
| Song et al. Japan [49] |
Effect of forest walking on autonomic nervous system activity in middle-aged hypertensive individuals: a pilot study |
| HRV and heart rate. In this study, two broad HRV spectral components were calculated: low frequency (LF; 0.04–0.15 Hz) and high frequency (HF; 0.15–0.40 Hz). The Profile of Mood State (POMS) RV and heart rate data were collected at 1-min intervals and then averaged over the entire 17-min course | |
| van den Berg and Beute The Netherlands [50] |
Walk it off! The effectiveness of walk and talk coaching in nature for individuals with burnout- and stress-related complaints |
| Burnout: the emotional exhaustion and distance scales of the Utrecht Burnout Scale. Bore-out: the Dutch Boredom Scale measures boredom at work and consists of 6 items. Mental health problems: the Dutch version of the Four Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire. Concentration and social functioning: two subscales from the Dutch Questionnaire Functioning when exhausted were added to measure concentration and attention. Pleasure at work: a single item question measured pleasure at work. Work engagement: the positive counterpart of burnout is engagement with work. State hope: the Adult State Hope Scale. State self-esteem: self-esteem was measured with the State Self-Esteem Scale Mindfulness: the short (14-item) Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory. Satisfaction with life: The Cantril ladder measures satisfaction with life subjective Health: a single-item question from the SF-36 Scale Measurement points: before the first walk (at baseline), after the second walk (after approximately 8–10 weeks) and after the therapy | |
| Wen et al. China [51] |
Effect of a rehabilitation garden on rehabilitation efficacy in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
| Exercise capacity, lung function, symptoms, psychological state, and the Body-Mass Index, Airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Exercise (BODE) comprehensive index of the patients before and after the treatment were assessed. After treatment, the intra-group 6-min walk test (6MWT), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC), the Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnea Scale, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and the Body-Mass Index, Airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Exercise (BODE) index Measurement points: before and after treatment | |
Characteristics of included articles
The included articles were from Austria [41,43], The Netherlands [50], Spain [45,48], UK [42], Japan [49], China [51], Pakistan [47], Canada [52], USA [46] and South Korea [44], published between 2015 and 2022. One was a qualitative study [42]. One on-going study identified at clinicaltrials.gov. The rest were peer-reviewed interventional effect studies: randomized controlled trials with two arms (n = 5) [45,47,48,51,52] and three arms [43], a randomized cross-over group pilot trial [46], a comparative intervention study without randomization [44], a quasi-experimental design with a control group, no randomization [50] and two within subject experimental studies [41,49], with large variation in the number of included participants (range 19–262, median: 50) (see Table 3).
Characteristics of included patients
A total of 788 patients were enrolled in the 11 completed studies with 259 male and 516 females (missing data on sex, n = 13). Mean age ranging from 19 ± 6.5 to 64 ± 4.0. In addition, 68 participants, 65–80 years of age, are to be enrolled in the clinicaltrials.gov registered study, which has not yet been completed [52].
The diagnoses of the included patients were: low back pain (n = 80), posterior neck pain (n = 64), fibromyalgia (n = 203), depression (n = 22), stress (n = 302), acquired brain injury (n = 18), mild cognitive impairment (n = 68), cancer (n = 19), hypertension (n = 20) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 60).
The recruitment of the patients for the studies was via a patient organization (n = 1), advertisement (n = 1), recruitment among patients who came to a healthcare centre (n = 2) and were already enrolled in treatment or rehabilitation (n = 5) (see Table 3).
Characteristics of interventions
The main nature-interacted exercise rehabilitation intervention in the included studies was walking (n = 10). One study used an intervention of surfing-therapy [42] and another used a neck-exercise intervention [44]. The interventions were different regarding frequency and dosage: one study doing two walks on 17 min, comparing one walk in the city with one walk in the forest [49]; Huber et al. with hiking in the Austrian mountains for five days in a row [43]; a walk and exercises for 15 min twice a day for four weeks [51]; Gibbs et al. with a course of 5 weeks with one two-hour session per week [42]; and Noushad et al. provided the most extensive intervention in a 12-week long period of 5 walks per week [47]. For further details, see Table 4.
The control or comparison interventions also had a great variety from no intervention [50], to sitting in a forest [47], and to walking indoors in the hospital basement tunnel system [46].
Five of the interventions were carried out by therapists [41–43,48,51]. Two were done by the participants alone [44,47], and in one study, peers who had previously participated in the intervention were in charge of the interventions [46]. In four studies, a coach, a nurse, specially trained staff or researchers without further description delivered the interventions [45,49,50,52]. None of the accountable staff members had received any kind of education or training in nature interacted rehabilitation where nature is integrated in the intervention.
In the surf intervention, the nature surroundings had great impact in the intervention, since the therapy took place in the water at a coast offering access for patients disabled and/or with walking difficulties [42], whereas the neck-exercise intervention had no described interaction with the nature environment [44]. The walking interventions had a great variety of incidental and intentional nature interaction. Incidental interaction – seen as only being the place where the walk took place, with no further description of interaction or meanings of so – was the case in (n = 4) [41,44,46,52]. Intentional nature interaction in the intervention was seen as being aware of hills [43,49], temperature and the nature of the forest [45], with conscious implementation of those factors in the intervention. One study also included the environment in the coaching conversation during the walk [50].
The rationales in the included studies
The rationale for the intervention in included studies was mainly that exercise-based rehabilitation and physical activity interventions have been found to have positive relation to mental and physical health [41–52], as opposed to sedentary behaviour.
The rationales for using the nature environment in the interventions were different. References and reasons for interaction with nature were based on the attention restoration theory in one study [42]. Three studies refer to theories saying that being exposed to natural environments has a stress reductive effect [41,47,50]. Theories of health promotion through forest bathing (n = 2) were seen in two studies [44,48], and there were theories where nature has a role in promoting human health, life happiness and well-being (n = 2) [46,49]. Six studies emphasized the restorative effects of spending time in nature on maintaining attention and concentration [43,45,47,48,50,52].
For further details on the theoretical rationale for exercise and nature interaction in the interventions (see Table 5).
Characteristics of outcomes
Apart from the one study that used semi-structured interviews after the intervention as data collection method [42], all other studies used different quantitative outcome measures. Emotional well-being was the most frequent outcome measured using various tools: EQ VAS [44,52], World Health Organization Well-Being Index [43], SF-36 Feeling Scale [41,48], The Profile of Mood State [49] and The Dutch version of the Four Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire [50]. Pain was also commonly measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) [43,44,48], questionnaire [44] and pain-diary [43,45]. Most outcomes were disease specific with a broad variety.
Different measures of quality of life, life satisfaction, depression, stress, mindfulness, self-esteem, concentration and social function were used in all of the 11 included studies using quantitative outcome measures. In the study by López-Pousa et al. [45], the forest’s temperature, luminosity and noise were measured. No other study had any measures regarding the outdoor surroundings.
All studies performed measurements before and after end of intervention. Three studies had a follow-up measurement 3–4 months after the end of the intervention [43,47,52] and two other studies used midterm measurements [48,50]. For further elaboration of used measurements (see Table 6).
Discussion
We found that the available evidence for EBNIR is limited and with a range of different study designs. Available studies are diverse regarding population diagnosis, intervention doses and frequency as well as regarding the outcome measures, aims and methods. The integration of nature in the intervention and the rationale for doing so are described in a very limited manner in most of the studies.
These findings are most useful for gaining a knowledge of the evidence base of EBNIR, and to create a better foundation, rationale and evidence for using exercise-based rehabilitation in nature for people with physical and mental health conditions.
This is the first study to map EBNIR. As expected, several of the existing studies investigating EBNIR include patients with mental disabilities. This is aligned with the growing body of evidence and effect of using the nature environment in nature interacted mental interventions in the sciences of psychology, psychotherapy, body awareness and mindfulness [19,20,53]. Still, we also found seven studies including patient groups with somatic disabilities, such as COPD, cancer and hypertension, where exercise-based rehabilitation in an indoor setting is a central part of treatment and rehabilitation [5]. Significant benefits are reported concerning leisure time physical activity conducted in an outdoor setting, both for the purpose of recreation and for health promotion; this goes for both patients with physical and mental health conditions, respectively [54]. Our study clearly calls for a better information base to conclude if this also is the case for EBNIR.
In general in most of the included studies, it was poorly described how the interventions interacted with nature. Since the nature elements and the environment are believed to have a significant impact on the intervention and effect hereof [9,14–16], it is highly relevant that studies, in detail, describe the nature elements and their interactions with the intervention. Otherwise, the potential effects of interactions between nature and the exercise-based intervention cannot be understood and studied properly.
We only found three studies where the rationale for performing the intervention in and with nature was described. Unfortunately, the only details described were that nature was thought of as having beneficial and recreational effect in patients, without further description of which elements in the nature or how it was used actively in the intervention. The intervention’s interaction with nature could therefore have been either incidental or intentional since neither the nature environment nor how it was interlinked with the intervention was described [43,45,52].
The study by van den Berg and Beute [50] described effects of incidental interaction with nature elements: like how a narrow trail in varying terrain was decisive for less talk and thereby high speed walking, and how paths along fallen and rotten trees gave narratives for letting go of emotions. Information on nature elements, like e.g. materials, equipment, the outdoor setting and how it was meant to be interlink with the exercise interventions, was not specified in the rest of the included studies.
Nevertheless, one study took the therapist education into consideration. The study by Serrat et al. [48] mentioned whether the therapists were educated in integrating the nature in the interventions, which is a subject of interest within EBNIR [55].
Our findings clearly illustrate a need for future studies to closely describe the nature elements and their interaction with the exercise-based intervention. Interactions could for example be described with inspiration from the additional extraction list made for this review. The list was made by an expert panel consisting of people with experience in developing and delivering nature interacted interventions, to account for all outdoor and natural environments in an intervention (see Supplementary Appendix 2). The list needs to undergo further validation, but can until then serve as a template for conducting and assessing nature interaction in exercise-based intervention.
Likewise, it would also be profitable to look at patients’ perceptions of the EBNIR. Only the qualitative study by Gibbs et al. [42] (with patients with acquired brain injury) gave in-depth and explorative knowledge on the perceptions, benefits and harms regarding the intervention in nature surroundings. One patient said: ‘what surf ability has given me is that it has helped me with my coordination, my fitness, getting out of the house, yeah, getting sacked by mother nature really’ [42]. This allows for a greater understanding of what nature can have of a supporting effect in relation to EBNIR.
In general, exploring how exposure to nature impacts the patients’ experience, compliance, motivation, flow and other elements could shed light on whether exercise-based rehabilitation in and with nature provides a better experience than indoors exercise-based rehabilitation. Including The Nature Relatedness Scale [56] or Connectivity to Nature Scale [57] in quantitative trails would be a simple way to collect data on the participants’ experiences.
In the review, we found that the included interventions were very focused on walking – although with some variations in quantity and frequency from 1 single walk to 5 times walking per week in 12 weeks, and from 17 to 60 min. It is somewhat surprising that there were no interventions containing balancing exercises, strength exercises and mobility training, since those exercise components are widely used in the treatment of several mental and physical health conditions [5].
When changing exercise setting to outdoor environment, adaptions are needed to ensure the quality of the intervention. Such adaptions need to undergo strict description to ensure replicability when designing and evaluating complex interventions and when implementing these into evidence-based, clinical settings [38,58]. The increased use of nature interventions could represent a setting that meets the needs, preferences and expectations of a proportion of people with physical and mental health conditions, thereby increasing the likelihood of participation, compliance and health benefits [59]. Yet our findings clearly highlight the need for a better research foundation to understand, design and evaluate exercise-based rehabilitation interacted with nature in people with physical and mental health conditions as part of treatment or rehabilitation.
Strengths and limitations
This scoping review is the first to create an overview of all the literature where physical exercise is performed in nature settings for people with physical and mental disabilities as part of treatment or rehabilitation, following the JBI methodology for scoping reviews searching multiple databases. The strict use of the JBI methodology is an important strength of this article. Preliminary searches revealed that studies to include in this scoping review would be sparse and diverse, and therefore both qualitative and quantitative research designs were included to explore the whole field of trials using EBNIR to create a baseline for the current evidence. Still despite employing a thorough search approach we might have missed relevant studies. In this review, we only address exercise-based intervention conducted with nature interaction [5,7,22] and therefore cannot comment on other types of interventions such as forest bathing [60], For instance, green exercise and green physical activity both contain physical exercise in a natural environment, but typically without structured interventions and outcome measures. Articles of such having no structured interventions or only carried out once [61] have been excluded because of a lack of structured exercise intervention. Further, we were particularly interested in studies providing nature-interacted interventions and having a rationale for this. Therefore, we excluded studies doing exercise outdoors without giving the natural environment a significant impact on the intervention. Future reviews addressing the effect of EBNIR may consider including such studies. This was, however, not the scope for this scoping review.
Conclusions
This scoping review reveals a limited and diverse evidence base within the field of EBNIR in patients with physical or mental health conditions. The rationale and interaction between the nature and the exercise intervention were poorly described, calling for future high-quality trials evaluating the effects of nature interacted exercise interventions to provide the foundation for future applicability in clinical practice and the community. Further, this review provides an important overview of particularly the exercise-based nature interventions interacting with nature that will be helpful in the design of interventions and study protocols for future EBNIR interventions.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Ulrik Sidenius, Sus Corazon and Ulrika Stigsdotter in the collaboration in developing an additional checklist to take into account all outdoor and nature elements and surroundings in the intervention extraction. We also thank Thorbjørn Hein for proofreading and Anne Cathrine Trumpy for Covidence and search support.
Funding Statement
This work has not been supported by any foundation. Drs. Tang, Holm, Skou are funded by a grant from Region Zealand (Exercise First). Dr. Tang is funded by The Danish Health Confederation through the Development and Research Fund for financial support (Project Nr. 2703) and Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals Research Fond, Denmark (Project No. A1277). Dr. Skou is funded by two grants from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program, one from the European Research Council (MOBILIZE, Grant Agreement No. 801790) and the other under Grant Agreement No. 945377 (ESCAPE). Dr. Bricca is funded by the MOBILIZE Grant. Mr. Ahler is funded by a grant from Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals Research Fund, Denmark (Project No. A1293) and The Danish Rheumatism Association, Denmark (Project No. R218-A7997).
Author contributions
Conceptualization: HB, JA, AB, PH, DVP, STS and LHT. Data curation: HB and JA. Formal analysis: HB, JA and LHT. Methodology: HB and LHT. Project administration: HB. Visualization: HB. Writing – original draft: HB. Writing review and editing: HB, JA, PH, AB, STS and LHT. Approval of final manuscript: HB, JA, PH, AB, STS and LHT.
Disclosure statement
Mr. Ahler and Drs. Skou and Tang are involved in a nationwide project offering nature-based exercise for people with arthritis. Furthermore, Dr. Skou is the co-developer of the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D) program, a not-for-profit initiative to implement clinical guidelines in primary care. The authors declare that they have no other conflicts of interest.
Data availability statement
Further data can be shared on request by emailing the corresponding author.
References
- 1.Anderson L, Thompson DR, Oldridge N, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(1):1. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Puhan MA, Gimeno-Santos E, Cates CJ, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12(12):CD005305. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005305.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Giné-Garriga M, Roqué-Fíguls M, Coll-Planas L, et al. Physical exercise interventions for improving performance-based measures of physical function in community-dwelling, frail older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(4):753–17. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Booth FW, Roberts CK, Laye MJ.. Lack of exercise is a major cause of chronic diseases. Comprehens Physiol. 2012;2(2):1143–1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pedersen BK, Saltin B.. Exercise as medicine – evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(Suppl. 3):1–72. doi: 10.1111/sms.12581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–229. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gutenbrunner C, Ward A, Chamberlain M.. White book on physical and rehabilitation medicine in Europe. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(45 Suppl.):6–47. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stigsdotter UK, Corazon SS, Sidenius U, et al. Efficacy of nature-based therapy for individuals with stress-related illnesses: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;213(1):404–411. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Louise Sofia M, Dorthe Varning P, Claus Vinther N, et al. “It was definitely an eye-opener to me”—people with disabilities’ and health professionals’ perceptions on combining traditional indoor rehabilitation practice with an urban green rehabilitation context. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Passantino A, Dalla Vecchia LA, Corrà U, et al. The future of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with heart failure. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:709898. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.709898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hinde S, Bojke L, Coventry P.. The cost effectiveness of ecotherapy as a healthcare intervention, separating the wood from the trees. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11599. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smith G, Cirach M, Swart W, et al. Characterisation of the natural environment: quantitative indicators across Europe. Int J Health Geogr. 2017;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0090-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li H, Browning M, Rigolon A, et al. Beyond "bluespace" and "greenspace": a narrative review of possible health benefits from exposure to other natural landscapes. Sci Total Environ. 2023;856(Pt 2):159292. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pálsdóttir AM, Persson D, Persson B, et al. The journey of recovery and empowerment embraced by nature – clients’ perspectives on nature-based rehabilitation in relation to the role of the natural environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(7):7094–7115. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110707094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Iyendo TO, Uwajeh PC, Ikenna ES.. The therapeutic impacts of environmental design interventions on wellness in clinical settings: a narrative review. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2016;24:174–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2016.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pálsdóttir AM, Stigsdotter UK, Persson D, et al. The qualities of natural environments that support the rehabilitation process of individuals with stress-related mental disorder in nature-based rehabilitation. Urban Forest Urban Green. 2018;29:312–321. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ballew MT, Omoto AM.. Absorption: how nature experiences promote awe and other positive emotions. Ecopsychology. 2018;10(1):26–35. doi: 10.1089/eco.2017.0044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lacharité-Lemieux M, Brunelle J-P, Dionne IJ.. Adherence to exercise and affective responses: comparison between outdoor and indoor training. Menopause. 2015;22(7):731–740. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Trøstrup CH, Christiansen AB, Stølen KS, et al. The effect of nature exposure on the mental health of patients: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(7):1695–1703. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Coventry PA, Brown JE, Pervin J, et al. Nature-based outdoor activities for mental and physical health: systematic review and meta-analysis. SSM Popul Health. 2021;16:100934. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pryor Anita HN, Parpenter C. Outdoor therapy: benefits, mechanisms and principles for activating health, wellbeing, and healing in nature. Outdoor environmental education in higher education. Hobart (Tasmania): Springer; 2021. p. 123–143. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Keniger LE, Gaston KJ, Irvine KN, et al. What are the benefits of interacting with nature? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(3):913–935. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10030913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Del Din S, Galna B, Lord S, et al. Falls risk in relation to activity exposure in high-risk older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(6):1198–1205. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Litleskare S, Fröhlich F, Flaten OE, et al. Taking real steps in virtual nature: a randomized blinded trial. Virtual Real. 2022;26(4):1777–1793. doi: 10.1007/s10055-022-00670-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wooller JJ, Rogerson M, Barton J, et al. Can simulated green exercise improve recovery from acute mental stress? Front Psychol. 2018;9:2167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chaudhury P, Banerjee D.. "Recovering with nature": a review of ecotherapy and implications for the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Public Health. 2020;8:604440. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 27.Vibholm AP, Christensen JR, Pallesen H.. Occupational therapists and physiotherapists experiences of using nature-based rehabilitation. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023;39(3):529–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Vujcic M, Tomicevic-Dubljevic J, Grbic M, et al. Nature based solution for improving mental health and well-being in urban areas. Environ Res. 2017;158:385–392. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sus Sola C, Ulrik S, Dorthe Varning P, et al. Psycho-physiological stress recovery in outdoor nature-based interventions: a systematic review of the past eight years of research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(10):1711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Grahn P, Pálsdóttir AM, Ottosson J, et al. Longer nature-based rehabilitation may contribute to a faster return to work in patients with reactions to severe stress and/or depression. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(11):1310. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sudimac S, Sale V, Kühn S.. How nature nurtures: amygdala activity decreases as the result of a one-hour walk in nature. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(11):4446–4452. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01720-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alfredsson LL. Åpne dørene for fysioterapeutiske tiltak utendørs! Fysioterapeuten; 2023. Available from: https://www.fysioterapeuten.no/fysioterapeut-fysioterapeuten-fysioterapeuter/apne-dorene-for-fysioterapeutiske-tiltak-utendors/147998
- 33.Stanhope J, Maric F, Rothmore P, et al. Physiotherapy and ecosystem services: improving the health of our patients, the population, and the environment. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023;39(2):227–240. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.2015814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Henriette B, Ulrik S, Line Planck K, et al. Economic evaluation of nature-based therapy interventions—a scoping review. Challenges. 2022;13(1):23. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Implement. 2021;19(1):3–10. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hinde S, Spackman E.. Bidirectional citation searching to completion: an exploration of literature searching methods. Pharmacoeconomics. 2015;33(1):5–11. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0205-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mahood Q, Eerd DV, Irvin E.. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(3):221–234. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348(3):g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Saleh AA, Ratajeski MA, Bertolet M.. Grey literature searching for health sciences systematic reviews: a prospective study of time spent and resources utilized. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2014;9(3):28–50. doi: 10.18438/b8dw3k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Frühauf A, Niedermeier M, Elliott LR, et al. Acute effects of outdoor physical activity on affect and psychological well-being in depressed patients – a preliminary study. Ment Health Phys Act. 2016;10:4–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2016.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gibbs K, Wilkie L, Jarman J, et al. Riding the wave into wellbeing: a qualitative evaluation of surf therapy for individuals living with acquired brain injury. PLOS One. 2022;17(4):e0266388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Huber D, Grafetstätter C, Proßegger J, et al. Green exercise and Mg–Ca–SO4 thermal balneotherapy for the treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2582-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kang B, Kim T, Kim MJ, et al. Relief of chronic posterior neck pain depending on the type of forest therapy: comparison of the therapeutic effect of forest bathing alone versus forest bathing with exercise. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39(6):957–963. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.López-Pousa S, Bassets Pagès G, Monserrat-Vila S, et al. Sense of well-being in patients with fibromyalgia: aerobic exercise program in a mature forest—a pilot study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:614783–614789. doi: 10.1155/2015/614783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Miller JM, Sadak KT, Shahriar AA, et al. Cancer survivors exercise at higher intensity in outdoor settings: the GECCOS trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021;68(5):e28850. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Noushad S, Ansari B, Ahmed S.. Effect of nature‐based physical activity on post‐traumatic growth among healthcare providers with post‐traumatic stress. Stress Health. 2022;38(4):813–826. doi: 10.1002/smi.3135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Serrat M, Almirall M, Musté M, et al. Effectiveness of a multicomponent treatment for fibromyalgia based on pain neuroscience education, exercise therapy, psychological support, and nature exposure (NAT-FM): a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10):3348. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Song C, Ikei H, Kobayashi M, et al. Effect of forest walking on autonomic nervous system activity in middle-aged hypertensive individuals: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(3):2687–2699. doi: 10.3390/ijerph120302687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.van den Berg AE, Beute F.. Walk it off! The effectiveness of walk and talk coaching in nature for individuals with burnout- and stress-related complaints. J Environ Psychol. 2021;76:101641. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101641. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wen Y, Lian L, Xun Z, et al. Effect of a rehabilitation garden on rehabilitation efficacy in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pak J Zool. 2020;52(6):2027–2426. doi: 10.17582/journal.pjz/20191204121245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liu-Ambrose T, University of British Columbia . Supporting aging through green exercise; 2023. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT050363042022
- 53.Bergenheim A, Ahlborg G Jr., Bernhardsson S.. Nature-based rehabilitation for patients with long-standing stress-related mental disorders: a qualitative evidence synthesis of patients’ experiences. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(13):6897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Manferdelli G, La Torre A, Codella R.. Outdoor physical activity bears multiple benefits to health and society. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019;59(5):868–879. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.18.08771-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Stigsdotter UK, Palsdottir AM, Burls A, et al. Nature-based therapeutic interventions. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2011. p. 309–342. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nisbet E, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA.. The Nature Relatedness Scale. Environ Behav. 2009;41(5):715–740. doi: 10.1177/0013916508318748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mayer F, Frantz CM.. The Connectedness to Nature Scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol. 2004;24(4):503–515. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(5):587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shanahan DF, Astell-Burt T, Barber EA, et al. Nature-based interventions for improving health and wellbeing: the purpose, the people and the outcomes. Sports. 2019;7(6):141. doi: 10.3390/sports7060141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Huang R, Li A, Li Z, et al. Adjunctive therapeutic effects of forest bathing trips on geriatric hypertension: results from an on-site experiment in the Cinnamomum camphora forest environment in four seasons. Forests. 2022;14(1):75. doi: 10.3390/f14010075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Arihiro H, Yoshiaki N, Takuro H.. Effects of a single session of walking on physiological and psychological stress in elderly adults: a pilot study. Adv Exerc Sports Physiol. 2011;16(4):109–115. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Further data can be shared on request by emailing the corresponding author.

