Abstract
The effectiveness of five recently developed contagion masks in filtering air-borne particles (1 to 5 μ diam) has been reported. One mask, available in four sizes, was 99% efficient. This mask can be reused after sterilization. The other four masks are available in only one size and are intended to be used one time only. Two of these four disposable types were more than 90% efficient but the variability of their respective test results was much greater than that for the reusable mask. The two remaining disposable types were less than 80% efficient. Two of these contagion-mask types were worn by hospital personnel for periods of up to 8 hr to determine the effect of such prolonged use on aerosol filtration efficiency. No significant decrease in filtration efficiency was noted. Physicians, nurses, and other hospital personnel who wear masks will benefit from the increased individual respiratory protection afforded by improved contagion masks. Concurrently, the incidence of hospital patient air-borne infections should be greatly reduced.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8876/f88767f1f59518b778564ef745b81780adee71f6" alt="66"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/785fa/785facc2b7cd07fc26a2345daab6716b48be939e" alt="67"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06811/06811b32e68906690eb95125bbcb24eb99cb30ba" alt="68"
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ADAMS R., FAHLMAN B., DUBE E. W., DUBE F. J., READ S. Control of infections within hospitals; special reference to prevention within operating rooms. J Am Med Assoc. 1959 Apr 4;169(14):1557–1567. doi: 10.1001/jama.1959.03000310009002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ADAMS R., FAHLMAN B., LORD J. New fashions in surgical attire. Am J Nurs. 1959 Aug;59(8):1102–1107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BLAIR E. H. M. Oh, for a mask; effective, comfortable, inexpensive, and disposable. Nurs Outlook. 1959 Jan;7(1):40–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GUYTON H. G., BUCHANAN L. M., LENSE F. T. Evaluation of respiratory protection of contagion masks. Appl Microbiol. 1956 May;4(3):141–143. doi: 10.1128/am.4.3.141-143.1956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GUYTON H. G., DECKER H. M., ANTON G. T. Emergency respiratory protection against radiological and biological aerosols. AMA Arch Ind Health. 1959 Aug;20(2):91–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KISER J. C., HITCHCOCK C. R. Comparative studies with a new plastic surgical mask. Surgery. 1958 Nov;44(5):936–939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROCKWOOD C. A., Jr, O'DONOGHUE D. H. The surgical mask: its development, usage, and efficiency. A review of the literature, and new experimental studies. Arch Surg. 1960 Jun;80:963–971. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1960.01290230081010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SHOOTER R. A., SMITH M. A., HUNTER C. J. A study of surgical masks. Br J Surg. 1959 Nov;47:246–249. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18004720312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]