Skip to main content
JCEM Case Reports logoLink to JCEM Case Reports
. 2023 Sep 21;1(5):luad111. doi: 10.1210/jcemcr/luad111

External Beam Radiotherapy in Advanced Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: An Observation of a Rare Abscopal Effect

Aiko Terakawa 1, Akiyo Tanabe 2,, Hidetsugu Nakayama 3, Ryogo Minamimoto 4
PMCID: PMC10580418  PMID: 37908203

Abstract

Metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma are incurable, and effective treatment of systemic symptoms resulting from catecholamine excess and local symptoms from tumor growth are crucial to prolong survival and improve quality of life. We report the first case of metastatic pheochromocytoma wherein external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) demonstrated efficacy in both target and nontarget lesions, demonstrating the “abscopal effect.” EBRT reduced tumor volume and catecholamine secretion and improved catecholamine excess-related complications, including glycemic control. EBRT is an effective treatment option for metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma because of its minimal invasiveness, safety, and potential for the rare abscopal effect.

Keywords: external beam radiotherapy, metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma, abscopal effect, catecholamine

Introduction

Pheochromocytoma (PCC) and paraganglioma (PPGL) are rare catecholamine-secreting neuroendocrine tumors that arise from chromaffin cells. PCC and paraganglioma are derived from the adrenal medulla and extra-adrenal paraganglia, respectively.

PPGLs have malignant potential, and metastatic disease is found in 10% to 17% of PPGL cases. Malignancy is confirmed when metastases are present in nonchromaffin tissues, such as the bone, lymph nodes, lungs, and liver. The prognosis of metastatic PPGL is poor; the 5-year and 20-year survival rates in nonmetastatic PPGLs are 96.8% and 93.7% [1], respectively, whereas, in metastatic PPGLs, these survival rates are 84.7% and 57.3% [1], respectively. Therefore, treating systemic symptoms resulting from catecholamine excess and local symptoms from tumor growth in patients with metastatic PPGL is crucial to prolong survival and improve quality of life. Curative treatment options for metastatic PPGL are currently unavailable; therefore, patients are treated with multidisciplinary therapies such as debulking surgery, chemotherapy (including cyclophosphamide, dacarbazine, and vincristine [CVD] regimen, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immunotherapeutic agents), and the radionuclides 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine or 177Lu-DOTATATE. For local tumor control, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), ablation therapy, and chemoembolization have been used.

EBRT is frequently used for local control and relief of metastatic PPGL-related bone pain and spinal cord compression. Local control has been achieved in 76% to 87% of patients, local symptom improvement in 81% to 94% of patients undergoing EBRT without severe toxicity [2, 3], and nonirradiated tumor progression in 75% of patients [3].

However, limited reports have evaluated the isolated efficacy of EBRT because its effects are not immediate and PPGLs are treated with multiple therapeutic modalities. Here, we report a patient with metastatic PCC in which EBRT demonstrated efficacy in both target and nontarget lesions, demonstrating the “abscopal effect,” with significantly reduced tumor size and decreased 24-hour urine normetanephrine (u-NMN) excretion.

Case Presentation

Case 1

A 46-year-old Japanese man had an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan that incidentally discovered a left adrenal tumor measuring 13 × 10 × 5 cm. His 24-hour u-NMN and metanephrine levels were 213.4 µmol/day (39.1 mg/day) (reference range, <1.6 µmol/day; <0.3 mg/day) and 1.5 µmol/day (0.3 mg/day) (reference range, <1.0 µmol/day; < 0.2 mg/day), respectively. The measurement of plasma free fractionated metanephrines was not available in Japan. Whole-body 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy showed uptake was limited to the tumor site. He had diabetes mellitus with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 8.9%.

Treatment

Alpha-adrenergic blockade was initiated as preoperative treatment, although despite the markedly elevated 24-hour u-NMN excretion, he did not have persistent or paroxysmal hypertension. After left adrenalectomy, his 24-hour u-NMN excretion normalized and the α-adrenergic blockade was discontinued. The HbA1c level improved to 5.0% without the aid of diabetes mellitus medications. We evaluated creatinine-corrected spot urine metanephrines, HbA1c level, and imaging findings in outpatient follow-up.

Thirty-eight months after the initial PCC diagnosis, multiple nodular lung lesions appeared, which were pathologically confirmed as PCC metastases (Fig. 1). The metastatic lesions grew slowly over the subsequent 44 months. At 82 months after PCC resection, the disease progressed rapidly, with spot u-NMN and HbA1c levels increasing to 10.9 µmol/g creatinine (2.0 mg/g creatinine) (reference range, < 1.6 µmol/g creatinine; < 0.3 mg/g creatinine) and 12.4%, respectively. Alpha-adrenergic blockade was initiated, and multiple daily insulin injections were required to achieve glycemic control. Additionally, multiple new metastases were identified in the mediastinal lymph nodes. Although the patient underwent 5 cycles of chemotherapy with the CVD regimen, increased 24-hour u-NMN excretion (40.4 µmol/day; 7.4 mg/day) and enlarging metastatic lesions in the lung and mediastinal lymph nodes on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT indicated progressive disease. The patient declined to continue chemotherapy. Because radionuclide treatment was unavailable in Japan at that time, no other systemic treatment options were available for the patient. The metastatic disease was limited to the lungs and mediastinal lymph nodes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Clinical course after primary tumor resection in case 1. Small lung metastases appeared 38 months after the initial diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Spot u-NMN levels gradually increased. Because HbA1c levels suddenly deteriorated to 12.4% at 82 months, insulin therapy was initiated. Subsequently, mediastinal lymph node metastases appeared. Spot u-NMN levels increased to 38.2 µmol/g creatinine (7 mg/g creatinine), and insulin requirements increased to 80 units/day. Five courses of CVD chemotherapy were ineffective. EBRT for mediastinal metastases was administered at 108 months. On the 15th day following EBRT, glycemic control improved, and the daily insulin doses were reduced to 38 units per day. Six months after EBRT, u-NMN and HbA1c levels were maintained at 10.9 µmol/g creatinine (2 mg/g creatinine) and 6.5% to 6.9% with 20 units of insulin per day, respectively. CVD, cyclophosphamide, dacarbazine, and vincristine; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; TDD, total daily insulin dose; u-NMN, urine normetanephrine.

At 108 months postoperatively, his spot u-NMN and HbA1c levels were 50.8 µmol/g creatinine (9.3 mg/g creatinine) and 8.4%, respectively. For his diabetes, he required treatment with 82 units of insulin per day. The patient underwent EBRT to limit the impact of the enlarging mediastinal lymph nodes on the surrounding mediastinal tissues. The extent of the external radiation exposure is shown in Fig. 2. The lesions were treated with EBRT using a 3-dimensional conformal technique with a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions; adverse events were absent.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Dosimetry of 3D conformal radiotherapy (A, B) and 18F-FDG-PET (C-E) and 18F-FDG-PET/CT (F-H) findings 2 months before EBRT (C, F), 6 months (D, G), and 10 months (E, H) after EBRT. The lesions were treated using a 3D conformal radiotherapy total dose of 50 Gy administered in 25 fractions (dosimetry of ≤46 Gy and 46-50 Gy is shown in A and B, respectively). 18F-FDG-PET/CT showed shrinkage of the right mediastinal lymph nodes within the irradiated area with a decreasing SUV. Additionally, the left hilar lymph nodes and multiple lung metastases outside the irradiated area also decreased in size or disappeared. EBRT, external beam radiation therapy; 3D, 3-dimensional; FDG-PET, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography; CT, computed tomography; SUV, standardized uptake value.

Outcome and Follow-up

18F-FDG-PET/CT scans completed before and after EBRT demonstrated tumor volume reduction (Fig. 2). We evaluated the metabolic tumor volume, an index that reflects the size and extent of tissues with high glucose metabolism and tumor lesion glycolysis, which is calculated by multiplying metabolic tumor volume with the average value of the standardized uptake value as an FDG accumulation index [4]. The sequential reduction rates of these indices are shown in Fig. 3. Interestingly, this effect was observed in both target (ie, metastatic right-sided mediastinal lymph nodes) and nontarget lesions (ie, metastatic left hilar lymph nodes and lung metastases). The spot u-NMN levels gradually declined, and the HbA1c levels improved after EBRT. Seven months after EBRT, the daily insulin requirement dropped to 20 units per day. In addition, the spot u-NMN and HbA1c levels were 10.9 µmol/g creatinine (2.0 mg/g creatinine) and 6.5%, respectively. There was no tumor progression for more than a year after EBRT.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The reduction rate of (A) MTV and (B) TLG. The changes in MTV before EBRT and 4 and 10 months after EBRT were 87.84, 29.79, and 7.99 mL (A-a), 13.06, 11.42, and 11.48 mL (A-b), and 18.66, 0.72, and 0.15 mL (A-c), respectively. The changes in TLG before EBRT and 4 and 10 months after EBRT were 641.03, 177.89, and 39.02 (B-a), 89.92, 49.2, and 44.59 (B-b), and 84.59, 1.29, and 0.15 (B-c), respectively. EBRT, external beam radiation therapy; MTV, metabolic tumor volume; TLG, total lesion glycolysis.

Cumulative experiences of EBRT in PPGL

During the evaluation and treatment (2016-2021) of our patient, there were 8 patients with metastatic PPGL who received EBRT using the 3-dimensional conformal technique in our hospital, and 3 of them (including our patient presented here) did not receive additional treatments for more than 2.5 months before and 6 months after EBRT (Table 1). The 3 patients did not have family history of PPGL, and genetic testing was not performed because of cost and lack of insurance coverage. The 24-hour or spot u-NMN levels gradually increased before EBRT in all cases during treatment with α-adrenergic blockade. EBRT methods are shown in Table 2. The average EBRT dose and biological effective dose (α/β = 10) (BED10) were 42 and 42.8, respectively. We defined an increase in tumor volume as an increase of ≥50% in the known tumor's diameter or as the appearance of new tumors and a decrease as a reduction of ≥50% in the known tumor's diameter on contrast-enhanced CT. An increase in HbA1c of ≥0.5% was defined as deterioration and a decrease of ≥0.5% was defined as an improvement. Tumor growth did not occur in any targeted lesion during the observation period of 6 to 26 months. However, reduction in size of nontarget lesions was only observed in the 1 patient reported here (Table 2). The 24-hour u-NMN levels decreased in all cases after EBRT (Table 3 and Fig. 4).

Table 1.

Clinical features of 3 patients with PPGL who were treated with EBRT following no additional treatment for >6 months

Age/sex PCC or PGL Disease duration Biochemical
phenotype
Treatments before EBRT Sites of metastases Duration since
last treatment
Case 1 55/M PCC 8 y Norepinephrine Primary tumor resection
CVD 4 cycles
Mediastinal lymph nodes
Lung
10 mo (CVD)
Case 2 72/M PGL 5 y Norepinephrine Primary tumor resection
CVD 19 cycles
Thoracic spine 2 y (CVD)
Case 3 52/F PCC 32 y Norepinephrine Primary tumor resection
Right lung metastases resection
Right renal metastases resection
CVD 3 cycles
EBRT for left mandible
Mediastinal lymph nodes
Left mandible
Lumber spine
Right retroperitoneum
8 mo (EBRT)
2.5 mo (CVD)

Abbreviations: CVD, chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, dacarbazine, and vincristine; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; F, female; M, male; PCC, pheochromocytoma; PGL, paraganglioma; PPGL, pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Table 2.

Methods of EBRT and changes in tumor volume in target and nontarget lesions

Target sites of EBRT Gy/Fr BED10
(Gy)
Volume change (observation periods after EBRT)
Target lesions Nontarget lesions
Case 1 Right mediastinal lymph nodes 50 Gy/25 Fr 50.0 Decrease (11 mo) Lung metastases: decrease (11 mo)
Left hilar lymph nodes: decrease (11 mo)
Case 2 Thoracic spine 46 Gy/23 Fr 46.0 No change (26 mo) None
Case 3 Lumber spine right and retroperitoneum 30 Gy/10 Fr 32.5 No change (7 mo in lumber spine and 6 mo in right retroperitoneum) Right hilar lymph nodes: increase (6 mo)
Left mandible: no change (6 mo)

Abbreviations: BED10, biological effective dose (α/β=10); EBRT, external beam radiotherapy.

Table 3.

Changes in urine normetanephrine and glycemic control before and after EBRT

u-NMN Glycemic control
Before EBRT After EBRT
(time of evaluation after EBRT)
Before EBRT After EBRT
(time of evaluation after EBRT)
HbA1c Treatments HbA1c Treatments
Case 1 50.8 µmol/gCre
(9.3 mg/gCre)
10.9 µmol/gCre
(2.0 mg/gCre)
(12 mo)
8.5% DPP4i + insulin 82 units 6.9% DPP4i + insulin 20 units (12 mo)
Case 2 8.7 µmol/gCre [New line](1.6 mg/gCre) 3.3 µmol/gCre
(0.6 mg/gCre)
(12 mo)
6.8% No medications 6.1% No change (12 mo)
Case 3 31.1 µmol/gCre
(5.7 mg/gCre)
22.9 µmol/gCre
(4.2 mg/gCre)
(6 mo)
6.2% DPP4i + TZD + SU 6.3% No change (6 mo)

Abbreviations: Cre, creatinine; DPP4i, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; NA, not assessed; SU, sulfonylureas; TZD, thiazolidine; u-NMN, spot urine normetanephrine.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Reduction rate of u-NMN levels after EBRT in 3 cases. u-NMN levels sequentially decreased after EBRT in all cases. EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; u-NMN, urine normetanephrine.

Discussion

This is the first case report of the abscopal effect on metastatic PPGL. In 1953, Mole et al [5] first described the abscopal effect as “action at a distance from the irradiated volume.” Although the mechanism remains unknown, the abscopal effect is likely mediated by antitumor immune response activation through radiotherapy. The abscopal effect has been documented in 46 cases reported between 1969 and 2014 [6]. Recently, the abscopal effect has attracted attention with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), resulting in an increase in the number of studies on the abscopal effect in patients treated with combination therapy of EBRT and ICIs, particularly in melanomas and non–small cell lung carcinomas. Systematic reviews have reported that the abscopal effect is observed in 1% to 45% of patients receiving combination therapy of EBRT and ICIs [7]. However, predictors of the duration of the abscopal effect and survival remain to be determined [8], and no reports exist on the abscopal effect in patients with metastatic PPGL. It has been reported that germline mutations in genes that predispose to PPGL may affect response to some treatments and prognosis. The relationships between germline pathogenic variants in PPGL genes and tumor response to EBRT or abscopal effect are unclear. Genetic testing is still not common in Japan because of cost and lack of insurance coverage; therefore, our patients described here did not have germline genetic testing.

EBRT decreases catecholamine secretion from target tumors, even in cases without significant tumor volume reduction. Previous reports revealed biochemical responses in 50% to 100% of cases in small groups of 4 to 6 patients [2, 3]. Breen et al reported that patients receiving BED10 ≥ 53 had higher local control rates than those receiving BED10 ≤ 53, and no acute grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in patients with BED10 between 9 and 132 [2]. In the patient reported here and in the other patients treated at our hospital during the same period, a biochemical response was observed in all patients, with an average BED10 of 42.8 (range, 32.5-50) and without any acute adverse events. EBRT-induced reduction in catecholamine secretion improved the catecholamine excess-associated complications. Additionally, glycemic control improved in concert with reduction in 24-hour u-NMN excretion after EBRT in 2 of the 3 patients in whom HbA1c levels were monitored. Although an early response to EBRT is rare, glycemic monitoring is necessary for patients treated with hypoglycemic agents.

A case of metastatic paraganglioma with exacerbated hypertension after EBRT has been reported [9]; however, several reports suggested no EBRT-related acute adverse events [2, 3]. In contrast, other local treatments, such as ablative therapy and chemoembolization, can cause severe complications, including hypertensive crises [10]. Therefore, EBRT is a safe local treatment option for patients with metastatic PPGL. Furthermore, EBRT may be a preferred option for both slowly progressing and limited metastatic PPGLs and for frail patients with advanced tumors who cannot undergo systemic therapy.

Learning Points

  • External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) reduces tumor volume and catecholamine secretion and improves catecholamine excess-related complications, including glycemic control, in patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL).

  • EBRT is an effective treatment option for patients with metastatic PPGL because of its minimal invasiveness, safety, and potential for the rare abscopal effect.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Abbreviations

BED10

biological effective dose (α/β = 10)

CT

computed tomography

CVD

cyclophosphamide dacarbazine, and vincristine

EBRT

external beam radiotherapy

HbA1c

glycated hemoglobin

ICI

immune checkpoint inhibitor

PCC

pheochromocytoma

PPGL

pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

u-NMN

urine normetanephrine

Contributor Information

Aiko Terakawa, Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.

Akiyo Tanabe, Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.

Hidetsugu Nakayama, Department of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.

Ryogo Minamimoto, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.

Contributors

All authors made individual contributions to authorship. A. Terakawa and A. Tanabe were in charge of the medical care for the patients and wrote the manuscript with important remarks from all authors. H.N. planned and conducted external beam radiotherapy. R.M. evaluated the findings of the positron emission tomography scan. All authors reviewed and approved the final draft.

Funding

This study was conducted as a part of ACPA-J (Advancing Care and Pathogenesis of Intractable Adrenal Diseases in Japan) through a research grant from the National Center for Global Health and Medicine in Japan (grant number 21A1015) and a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare in Japan (Nanjiseisikkan-seisakukenkyu-jigyo, 20FC1020 and 23FC0201).

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Informed Patient Consent for Publication

Signed informed consent obtained directly from patients.

Data Availability Statement

Original data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • 1. Pamporaki C, Prodanov T, Meuter L, et al. Determinants of disease-specific survival in patients with and without metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Eur J Cancer. 2022;169:32‐41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Breen W, Bancos I, Young WF, et al. External beam radiation therapy for advanced/unresectable malignant paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018;3(1):25‐29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Vogel J, Atanacio AS, Prodanov T, et al. External beam radiation therapy in treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Front Oncol. 2014;4:166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Takenaka J, Watanabe S, Abe T, et al. Prognostic value of [18F]FDG-PET prior to [131I]MIBG treatment for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). Ann Nucl Med. 2023;37(1):10‐17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Mole RH. Whole body irradiation; radiobiology or medicine? Br J Radiol. 1953;26(305):234‐241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Abuodeh Y, Venkat P, Kim S. Systematic review of case reports on the abscopal effect. Curr Probl Cancer. 2016;40(1):25‐37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Plá M R, Beltrán D D, Albiach E F. Immune checkpoints inhibitors and SRS/SBRT synergy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and melanoma: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hatten SJ, Lehrer EJ, Liao J, et al. A patient-level data meta-analysis of the abscopal effect. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022;7(3):100909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Teno S, Tanabe A, Nomura K, Demura H. Acutely exacerbated hypertension and increased inflammatory signs due to radiation treatment for metastatic pheochromocytoma. Endocr J. 1996;43(5):511‐516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kohlenberg J, Welch B, Hamidi O, et al. Efficacy and safety of ablative therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(2):195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Original data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article.


Articles from JCEM Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES