Skip to main content
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology logoLink to Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
. 2023 May 30;33(9):1119–1129. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2303.03004

Assembly and Function of Seed Endophytes in Response to Environmental Stress

Yong-Lan Wang 1, Han-Bo Zhang 1,*
PMCID: PMC10580892  PMID: 37311706

Abstract

Seeds are colonized by diverse microorganisms that can improve the growth and stress resistance of host plants. Although understanding the mechanisms of plant endophyte-host plant interactions is increasing, much of this knowledge does not come from seed endophytes, particularly under environmental stress that the plant host grows to face, including biotic (e.g., pathogens, herbivores and insects) and abiotic factors (e.g., drought, heavy metals and salt). In this article, we first provided a framework for the assembly and function of seed endophytes and discussed the sources and assembly process of seed endophytes. Following that, we reviewed the impact of environmental factors on the assembly of seed endophytes. Lastly, we explored recent advances in the growth promotion and stress resistance enhancement of plants, functioning by seed endophytes under various biotic and abiotic stressors.

Keywords: Seed endophytes, biotic stresses, abiotic stresses, assembly, growth-promoting mechanism

Introduction

We know that there are a large number of endophytes in the tissues of plant roots, stems, leaves, flowers, fruits, and seeds [1-4]. As a reproductive organ of plants, seeds are one of the most significant stages in the life history of plants [5] and carry a variety of endophytic microbes that can be transmitted to offspring through parental plants [6]. Endophytes present in seeds do not produce any visible disease symptoms on seeds or host plants and are classified as both obligate and facultative [7]. Here, this classification depends on their life strategies: the survival of obligate endophytes depends entirely on the host plant, while facultative endophytes can survive outside the host plant and are not completely dependent on the host plant [8]. As a key component of the plant microbiome, the seed microbiome is not only the end point of microbial community assembly in seeds, but also the starting point of new seedling microbiome assembly [9]. Generally, seeds and endophytes form a symbiotic relationship by which endophytes colonizing the seed interior depend on the host for the required water, nutrients, and oxygen [10]; in turn, endophytes can enhance seed viability, improve germination and resilience, and directly or indirectly promote plant growth and development. Under stress conditions, endophytes can also improve the growth of host plants. Therefore, seed endophytes are of ecological importance for host plants [11, 12].

Seed endophytes are phylogenetically diverse, and the common phyla are fungi of Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota, and bacteria of Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria [13, 14]. For seed endophyte bacteria, the common genera in different host plant seeds are Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Pantoea, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and Acinetobacter [11]. Seed endophytic fungi are dominated by Basidiomycetes and Ascomycetes [15]. Ascomycetes are more diverse, such as Dothideomycetes, Sordariomycetes, Leotiomycetes, and Eurotiomycetes, and the Basidiomycete class Tremellomycetes dominates the seeds of Brassicaceae plants [16]. Dothideomycetes are a kind of filamentous ascomycete, such as Alternaria, Cladosporium, Phoma, Phaeosphaeria, and Epicoccum, which are common genera [15]. Of course, Epichloae species are the most common seed endophytic fungi in the Poaceae family [17]. Even so, studies have noted that the diversity of endophytes in plant seeds is generally lower than that in other tissues [18]. In fact, the long-term evolutionary selection of plants and the repeated transmission of endophytes from generation to generation, together with the limitations of the internal environment of seeds, usually lead to a decrease in endophyte diversity and even the loss of beneficial endophytes [19]. Although endophytes in seeds have been continuously discovered by means of high-throughput sequencing techniques, some endophytes are difficult to isolate and culture from seeds even if they show high abundance [1, 20, 21]. These limitations bring challenges to research on seed endophytes, and thus, the effects of most seed endophytes on plants have yet to be clarified [22].

Recently, seed endophyte-host interactions in response to environmental factors have gained increasing attention. Plant-seed microbe interactions in response to climate change are extremely important [23]. In particular, the increasing frequency of droughts and extreme events has severely affected crop yields and constrained agricultural development [24, 25]. Therefore, the potential of using seed endophytic microbes to improve crop yields in the context of adhering to sustainable agricultural development has repeatedly attracted attention [26]. Moreover, with the development of industrialization, soil environmental pollution has become an urgent problem, especially the soil acid-base imbalance caused by heavy metal pollution. Phytoremediation can effectively degrade toxic contaminants in soil through interroot microbial degradation [27]. Interestingly, in contaminated soils, a recent study indicated that some species or populations of seed endophytes can also show eco-physiological responses to withstand stress factors by affecting the activities of antioxidant enzymes in host plants [28].

Many excellent papers have reviewed the role of endophytic microbes associated with roots, stems, leaves, and flowers in plant growth and adaptability [29-31], and endophytic microbes have been commonly applied as inoculants for crops [32, 33]. Nonetheless, the understanding of the assembly and function of seed-associated endophytes in response to environmental stress remains to be reviewed. Here, we first provided a framework for the assembly and function of seed endophytes and discussed the sources and assembly process of seed endophytes; then, we reviewed the impact of environmental factors on the assembly of seed endophytes; and finally, we explored recent advances in the growth promotion and stress resistance enhancement of plants, functioning by seed endophytes under various biotic and abiotic stressors.

Framework for the Assembly and Function of Seed Endophytes

Plant endophytic microbes have two transmission modes: horizontal transmission and vertical transmission. Although their relative importance is still unclear, both modes of transmission may contribute to the growth of host plants [34]. Horizontal transmission refers to endophytic microbes obtained through airborne spores (air source), through foraging and transferring of insects, birds, and other animals (animal source), and through rhizosphere soil (soil source); vertical transmission means that endophytic microbes are the source of the transfer of seeds, pollen, etc. These vertically transmitted endophytic microbes are mainly obligate symbionts because their survival is completely dependent on the host plant [6, 35]. In fact, we know that the vertical transmission of endophytes is more common than previously expected and that beneficial microbes colonizing in seeds are usually transmitted from generation to generation. Therefore, vertical transmission is also defined as a direct transfer from parents to offspring because it is conducive to reciprocal symbiosis [36]. For example, in the study of Hodgson et al. [6], two endophytic fungi, Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium sphaerospermum were vertically transmitted from mother to offspring in six species of Gramineae: Centaurea cyanus, Centaurea nigra, Papaver rhoeas, Plantago lanceolata, Rumex acetosa, and Senecio vulgaris. In addition, the same endophytic microbial species were detected in Panicum virgatum L. seeds and in plants of seed origin collected one year ago, confirming that endophytes are transmitted vertically to the next generation of hosts [37]. Several studies have even noted that the vertical transmission rate of endophytes is more than 90% [38], most of which represents the core microbiota within the seeds.

Generally, endophytes have different pathways to enter seeds, and in the studies that have been described, there are three routes of microbial transmission into seeds: (1) through the use of nonvascular tissues or xylem; (2) through the stigma of the parent plant; and (3) through contact between the seed and external sources of contamination [11, 16, 39, 40]. The ‘primary symbiont hypothesis’ suggests that seed endophytic microbial transmission is the result of interactions between plant defenses and seed-borne microbes, which cause a primary or at least a unique endophytic symbiont in an individual plant seed [41]. Therefore, the stage of seed germination to growth is influenced by the presence or absence of this primary symbiont, such as helping plants adapt to competition; consequently, the core microbiota in plants may be endophytic microbes transmitted by the mother [41, 42].

Therefore, we can conclude the framework for both the assembly and function of seed endophytes in response to environmental stress (Fig. 1). Seeds naturally fall off to the ground after maturation (arrow 1) and then germinate to grow until flowering and fruiting to produce the next generation’s seeds (arrow 2), in which seed microbes from the first generation (SE1) can partially pass to the next generation due to host physiological selection (vertical transmission), with other microbial sources including soils, air and animals (horizontal transmission) to build the seed microbes in the second generation (SE2). Undoubtedly, the assembly of seed microbiota from generation to generation can be affected by environmental stress that the plant host grows to face, and in turn, endophyte microbes colonizing inside the seeds can promote plant growth and enhance stress tolerance, either directly or indirectly. Here, the environmental factors are diverse and include biotic factors (e.g., pathogens, herbivores and insects, etc.) and abiotic factors (e.g., drought, salt, heavy metals, rainfall, agrochemicals, soil, heat, etc.). Currently, few studies address the response of seed endophytes to these environmental stressors.

Fig. 1. Framework for the assembly and function of seed endophytes in response to environmental stress.

Fig. 1

Seeds naturally fall off to the ground after maturation (arrow 1) and then germinate to grow until flowering and fruiting to produce the next generation’s seeds (arrow 2), in which seed microbes from generation one (SE1) can partially pass to the next generation (vertical transmission), with other microbial sources including soils, air and animals (horizontal transmission) to build the seed microbes in generation two (SE2). The assembly of seed endophytes is affected by host physiology during individual development, as well as by environmental stress including biotic (e.g., pathogens, herbivores and insects) and abiotic (e.g., drought, heavy metals and salt) factors and in turn, seed endophytes colonizing inside the host plant can promote plant growth and enhance stress tolerance, either directly or indirectly.

Here, we emphasized the role of host physiology and environmental factors in the assembly of seed endophytic microbiota during their transmission from SE1 to SE2, which may lead to a change in the diversity of seed microbiota. Because host genetics play an important role in seed phenotype and chemical composition within seeds, parental lines may indirectly impact the plant-to-seed transmission stage of seed microbes and thus can influence seed endophyte assembly [43]. Therefore, there are four main processes that drive microbial community assembly and composition in host plants: (1) abiotic and host filtering; (2) ecological drift; (3) dispersal; and (4) species interactions [44-46]. A study by Kim et al. [47] confirmed that the distribution of rare seed microbe taxa is limited by dispersal, while the distribution of prevalent taxa is influenced by homogeneous selection and ecological drift. It has been proposed that the factors driving the assembly of seed microbiota may be based on niche ecological processes or neutral processes, usually stochastic in nature, with ecological niche processes involving the internal environment of the seed, the soil environment in which it grows, and recruitment, while neutral processes include obtaining microbes that are transmitted to the seed through air and rainfall [9]. Indeed, the neutral model also emphasizes the importance of selection as the main driver of microbial community assembly in different plant species, as well as the main ecological process for the succession of dominant taxa during seed filling and maturation [48]. In addition, it was found that the temporal colonization patterns of seed microbial communities were affected by niche changes and neutrality in the process of dynamic transmission from parent to progeny [49].

Prado et al. [50] showed that insect pollination is involved in the assembly of seed microbiota, a neutral ecological process of microbial transmission between flowers and seeds, and that it can reduce the diversity of seed-associated microbiota. In a recent study, Chesneau et al. [51] found that, during the development of individual seeds, the assembly of bacterial communities associated with bean seeds was mainly driven by selection, whereas ecological drift occurred in the early assembly stages of the radish seed microbiota, and the main process of community assembly shifted to be driven by selection in late seed maturation. In general, the enrichment of bacteria was reduced, and only one dominant taxonomic unit was able to colonize. Although some studies have observed Raphanus sativus in three successive generations of radish seeds, the low heritability of the seed microbiota over generations may be explained by climatic conditions leading to differences in community structure in successive generations of plants based on neutral processes. However, for the formation of seed-associated bacterial communities, ecological drift is an important driver, while propagation is also involved in the seed microbiota assembly of the fungal fraction of the seed microbiome [52]. Several studies have also shown that the number and diversity of culturable endophytes in seeds decrease with seed age [53, 54]. Furthermore, Abdelfattah et al. [43] referred to dormancy as the period between seed maturation and germination, including seed storage, seed banks, and the period the seed remains in the environment or inside the animal’s gut. In this state, multiple environmental stressors may also affect the assembly of second-generation seed endophytes (Fig. 1).

Assembly of Seed Endophytes in Response to Environmental Stress

Many studies have explored the function of seed endophytes in plant growth and adaptability (see below discussion), and relatively few reports have determined the impact of environmental factors on the assembly of seed endophytes.

Heavy Metal Contamination

Truyens et al. [55] reported the effects of contaminants on the composition and characteristics of seed bacterial communities associated with Arabidopsis thaliana, and found that cross-generational Cd exposure under greenhouse conditions resulted in changes in A. thaliana seed endophytic populations: Sinorhizobium sp. and Micrococcus sp. were dominantly present in the uncontaminated seeds, while Pseudomonas sp., Bosea sp., and Paenibacillus sp. were present in the Cd-exposed seeds. However, in another study, endophytic isolates from Agrostis capillaris seeds grown on uncontaminated soil (i.e., control) were more numerous than those from contaminated soil, without much variation in species composition [56]. Moreover, Croes et al. [57] reported that the root endophytic communities of Brassica napus L. grown in Cd, Zn, and Pb-contaminated fields and noncontaminated fields showed a similar pattern for the common obligate endophytic community of seeds. Therefore, although heavy metal contamination may have an impact on seed-associated microbiota, host plants likely harbor similar core seed microbes, suggesting strong host selection pressure.

Stalt Stress

Salt stress can greatly affect the assembly of seed microbiota of the host genotype and physiological adaptations of rice. For example, recent evidence suggests that the overall seed endophytic communities of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant rice varieties are Pantoea, Pseudomonas, Microbacterium, Kosakonia, Xanthomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Delftia, Ralstonia, Sphingomonas, Rhizobium, Paenibacillus, Herbaspirillum, Enterobacter, Curtobacterium, and Bacillus. Under salt stress, the dominant community for both salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant rice shifted to a bacterial community dominated by Flavobacterium, Pantoea, Enterobacter, Microbacterium, Kosakonia and Curtobacterium [58].

Drought Stress

The seed microbial composition can change with the exposure of parent plants to drought. A recent study showed that the structure of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seed microbiome (bacteria, archaea, and fungi) greatly varied under abiotic treatments (control; 66% moisture: mild drought; Hoagland nutrient treatment). Nutrition and intensive drought treatments changed the microbiota structure of bacteria and archaea communities; for the fungal community, Aspergillus fungal communities were dominant in both control and treated seeds, whereas other fungal taxa, e.g., Penicillium and Wallemia, shifted in all treated seeds [59]. Furthermore, the bacterial endophytes of wheat seeds changed under drought conditions, with increased α and β diversity, and enrichment of Actinomycetes but significant depletion of Gammaproteobacteria. Nonetheless, when wheat is exposed to rainfed or drought conditions, drought-tolerant varieties selectively enrich some beneficial seed microbes [60].

Cross-Generation Effects

Interestingly, Kim et al. [49] showed that parental seeds and the inner layer of the stem at the mature stage are the main microbial sources of the next generation’s seed. Therefore, it can be expected that, the environmental conditions for the storage of parental seeds and the whole process from parental seeds to the next generation of seeds can impact the origin of seed microbial communities (Fig. 1). For storage of parent seeds, there is evidence that temperature change, seed water content, and time interaction all have negative effects on the viability of endophytes [61]. A recent study showed that soil water stress in the parent environment will lead to a decline in the seed germination rate and overall seedling performance [62]. However, it is unclear how this stress impacts the origin of endophytes in the next generation’s seeds. In addition, pathogens and metabolic disorders in seeds also affect the assembly of seed microbes, and further impact their transmission to next generations [43].

Several points are worth exploring in the future for the assembly of seed endophytes in response to environmental stress. First, the host plant commonly faces diverse environmental stressors during the whole growth season (Fig. 1). Current works have explored the assembly of seed endophytes under single factors, such as heavy metal contamination, salt stress, and drought conditions, and a great challenge is to determine the compound environmental effects on the origin of seed microbial communities. Moreover, there is currently no literature to determine how seed endophytes respond to some popular novel pollutes, e.g., microplastics. Second, by our review, we found that most research works have mainly focused on crops of host plants, particularly those from Poaceae (Table 1). Crops are under intense artificial management, which can generate strong selection pressure on seed endophytes, including using herbicides [63] and genetic modification of host plants [64]. However, there is no report exploring how artificial management impacts the seed endophyte composition interacting with environmental stress. Such works are very valuable for better application of seed microbes in sustainable agriculture. Third, little work has been performed to explore the response of seed endophytes to environmental change for those living in the wild. Seed endophytes can impact seed quality and viability thus influencing plant population dynamics [12]. For example, seed endophytes can prevent the loss of biodiversity and save threatened host species in ecosystem restoration [65]; thus, seed endophyte assembly is becoming important for understanding ecosystem stability under environmental change. Finally, it is not enough to explore intergenerational transmission [52] under environmental stress to better understand the coevolution of endophytes and host plants.

Table 1.

The function and mechanism for seed endophytes to improve host plant growth and resistance to stress.

Seed endophytesa Host plant Familyb Mechanisms References
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (B) (Bac) Rice Poaceae (C) Production of gibberellin and ACC deaminase [69]
Burkholderia gladioli (B)(Bur) Maize Poaceae (C) Promotion plant absorption of nutrients [75]
Cladosporium cladosporioides (F) (Cla) Suaeda Salsa Chenopodiaceae (C) Secreting certain signal molecules as signal transduction of plant hormones [70]
Bacillus (Bac) Paenibacillus (B) (Pae) Cucurbitaceae family Cucurbitaceae (C) Producing auxin IAA [71]
Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) (B) (Bac) Tomato Solanaceae (C) Producing ACC deaminase and organic acid, nitrogen fixation [72]
Methylobacterium (B) (Met) Crotalaria pumila Fabaceae (C) There are genes associated with nitrogen and carbon fixation, photosynthesis and oxidative phosphorylation [77]
Bacillus spp. (Bac)
Klebsiella spp. (Ent)
Staphylococcus spp. (Sta)
Pseudomonas spp. (B) (Pse)
Pachycereus pringlei Cactaceae (WP) Releasing nutrients from rocks; produce organic acids; nitrogen fixation [73]
Kosakonia sp. (Ent)
Pantoea spp. (Erw)
Xanthomonas sp. (B) (Xan)
Rice Poaceae (C) Producing an iron carrier; dissolve phosphorus [74]
Sphingomonas melonis (B) (Sph) Rice Poaceae (C) Secreting extracellular signal molecules; resistance to pathogens [78]
Pseudomonas spp. (B) (Pse) Phragmites australis Poaceae (WP) Production of antifungal metabolites and proteases; resistance to pathogens [79]
Bacillus velezensis (B) (Bac) Maize Poaceae (C) Existence of lipopeptide antibiotic gene and antifungal activity [80]
Bacillus subtilis (B) (Bac) Pennisetum glaucum L. Gramineae (C) Existence of antifungal lipopeptide gene [81]
Lysinibacillus sp. (Bac)
Paenibacillus dendritiformis (B) (Pae)
Maize Poaceae (C) Resistance pathogens and improvement seedling growth and development; existence of antifungal lipopeptide gene; synthetic auxin; dissolved phosphate [82]
SLB4-Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pse)
SLB6-Pseudomonas sp. (Pse)
SY1-Pseudomonas sp. (B) (Pse)
Rice Poaceae (C) Resistance pathogens; promotion root and stem growth; Production of HCN (hydrogen cyanide) volatiles and presence of antifungal genes [85]
Methylobacterium sp. (M3) (Met)
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (M4) (B) (Bac)
Urochloa ramosa L. Poaceae (C) Resistance pathogens and promotion the growth and development of seedlings; existence of antifungal lipopeptide gene [86]
Bacillus(B) (Bac) Cucurbit Cucurbitaceae (C) Releasing acetyl and/or diacetyl; production extracellular ribonuclease; resistance to pathogens [87]
Epichloë festucae (F) (Cla) Festuca rubra Poaceae (C) Resistance to insects; producing alkaloids [17]
Epichloë sylvatica (F) (Cla) Brachypodium sylvaticu Poaceae (WP) Resistance to insects; producing allelopathic substances [90]
Epicoccum nigrum FZT214 (F) (Did) Dysphania ambrosioides Chenopodiaceae (WP) Resistance to heavy metal Cd stress; enhancement of chlorophyll and glutathione content in host plants [94]
Neotyphodium (F) (Cla) Elymus dahuricus Poaceae (C) Resistance to heavy metal Cd stress; influence of antioxidant enzymes activity, proline and malondialdehyde content [95]
Serratia nematodima LRE07 (B)(Yer) Solanum nigrum L. Solanaceae (WP) Resistance to heavy metal Cd stress; improvement the absorption of nutrients by plants; increasing antioxidant enzyme activity [96]
Bacillus sp. (Bac)
Pantoea sp.(B) (Erw)
Agrostis capillaris Poaceae (C) Increasing phosphorus; producing IAA [56]
Pantoea sp. (Erw)
Bacillus sp. (B) (Bac)
Medicago sativa Fabaceae (C) Resistance to salt stress; producing IAA, antagonize fungi, and have osmotic tolerance [99]
Fusarium. Verticillioides (F) (Nec) Soybean Fabaceae (C) Resistance to salt stress; influencing lipid peroxidation and protein content [100]
Kosakonia cowanii (F) (Ent) Lactuca serriola Asteraceae (WP) Producing extracellular polysaccharides and maintaining soil moisture [103]

aBac: Bacillaceae; Bur: Burkholderiaceae; Cla: Cladosporiaceae; Pae: Paenibacillaceae; Met: Methylobacteriaceae; Ent: Enterobacteriaceae; Sta: Staphylococcaceae; Pse: Pseudomonadaceae; Erw: Erwiniaceae; Xan: Xanthomonadaceae; Sph: Sphingomonadaceae; Cla: Clavicipitaceae; Did: Didymellaceae; Yer: Yersiniaceae; Nec: Nectriaceae. B: Bacteria; F: Fungi.

bC: crop; WP: wild plant.

Functions of Seed Endophytes in Response to Environmental Stress

The interaction between seed endophytes and plants is complex and diverse. In recent years, we have a more comprehensive understanding of the growth-promoting and stress-resistant mechanisms of seed endophytes under various biotic and abiotic environmental stresses, including: (1) promoting host plants to obtain nutrients by producing hormones; (2) producing metabolites and volatile compounds and harnessing lipopeptide genes to induce host defense against biological diseases; and (3) enhancing antioxidant activity (Table 1).

Promotion of Plant Growth by Seed Endophytes

Producing plant hormones to regulate plant growth. Seed endophytes can directly promote plant growth by producing plant hormones or hormone-related signaling molecules (Fig. 1). Previously, many studies indicated that, endophytic bacteria in other plant tissues, such as Azospirillum lipoferum, can produce gibberellin and combine with other plant hormones to alleviate the drought effect of maize [66]; moreover, endophytic fungi such as Phoma glomerata LWL2 and Penicillium sp. LWL3 were also able to produce gibberellins, but they were isolated from plant roots, not seeds [67]. Although the mechanism of action to positively affect the host plant relies on multiple aspects, there is growing evidence that seeds require the involvement of phytohormones at all stages from germination to growth and maturity; therefore, seed endophytic-microbes can synthesize phytohormones in a direct or indirect manner to promote host plant growth [68]. Endophytic bacteria such as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens isolated from rice seeds could produce gibberellin; inoculation of B. amyloliquefaciens at the seedling stage significantly promoted rice plant height, mainly because endophytic bacteria could regulate the endogenous plant hormone gibberellin [69]. Of course, some seed endophyte-mediated growth-promoting mechanisms of plant phenotypes have not yet been explained. For example, inoculation with appropriate concentrations of seed endophytic fungi such as Cladosporium cladosporioides could significantly increase the germination rate of the coastal plant Suaeda salsa. Furthermore, it was found that C. cladosporioides also had an obvious growth-promoting effect on the growth of American sweetgum seedlings. However, the mechanism of promoting growth is unclear, and it is assumed that the fungus may secrete some kind of molecules involved in the signal transduction of plant hormones [70].

Seed endophytes have a strong ability to produce auxins such as indoleacetic acid (IAA). For example, 33% of the endophytes cultured from Cucurbitaceae seeds can produce the plant hormone indole-3-acetic acid; moreover, these endophytes can improve host nutrient acquisition by a variety of pathways, including nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, secretion of iron carriers, and production of ACC deaminase. Therefore, these strains can be developed into growth-promoting bacteria [71]. In addition, Bacillus subtilis HYT-12-1 in tomato seeds exhibited a significant plant growth promoting (PGP) effect on tomato seedlings by producing ACC deaminase to inhibit ethylene production, as well as enhancing nitrogen fixation and organic acid production [72].

Improving the ability of plants to absorb nutrient elements. Seed endophytes can improve the absorption capacity of nutrient elements to promote plant growth (Fig. 1). Seed endophytes can help plants obtain nutrients by dissolving phosphate [71], producing organic acids [72], fixing nitrogen [73], and producing iron carriers [74]. A recent study showed that the seed-borne beneficial microbe Burkholderia gladioli can promote nutrient uptake from the soil by the host plant when the plant is deficient in nutrients and can therefore be seen as a functional compensatory pool for plant rhizosphere colonization [75]. In addition, there are genes related to nitrogen and carbon fixation, photosynthesis, and oxidative phosphorylation in endophytes dominated by Methylobacterium in Crotalaria pumila seeds, and the genes involved in nitrogen metabolism can help host plants absorb nitrogen [76, 77]. Endophytic microbes in cactus seeds can release a large number of nutrients useful to plants from rocks (such as phosphorus in crushed rocks), produce volatile and nonvolatile organic acids, and have the ability to fix nitrogen [73]. In addition, some seed endophytes are able to secrete small-molecule proteins that bind Fe in the soil to promote Fe uptake by plants. For example, most strains of Kosakonia sp., Pantoea spp., and Xanthomonas sp. in rice seeds can produce Fe carriers and solubilize phosphate [74].

Improvement of the Resistance of Plants to Biotic Stress

Resistance to pathogens. Several studies have shown that seed endophytes can improve plant resistance to diseases (Fig. 1). For example, the rice seed endophytic bacterium Sphingomonas melonis can secrete the small extracellular signal molecule o-aminobenzoic acid in coordination with the host response to prevent infection and the production of toxins by the pathogen Burkholderia plantarii, further clarifying the role of seed endophytes in plant pathology in the “disease triangle” [78]. Members of the genus Pseudomonas spp. isolated from the seeds of Phragmites australias secrete unknown antifungal metabolites to inhibit the fungal pathogens Sclerotinia homoeocarpa and Fusarium oxysporum. Interestingly, Pseudomonas spp. were previously shown to produce metabolites such as hydrogen cyanide and pyoluteorin for biological disease control; at the same time, Pseudomonas fluorescens (i.e., Sandy LB4 ) can secrete a protease, allowing it to degrade surrounding microbial proteins to obtain organic nitrogen, promoting the germination of Phragmites australias seeds, increasing seedling root branches, and improving host plant competitiveness with other plants [79].

In addition, the lipopeptide antibiotic genes in seed endophytes can help hosts resist pathogens. For example, the maize seed endophytic bacterium Bacillus velezensis contains biocontrol-related genes (including bioA, bmyB, ituC, fenD, srfAA, srfAB, yngG, and yndJ) that can encode lipopeptide antibiotics, so that they show antifungal activity against pathogens such as Talaromyces funchoosus, Penicillium oxalicum, and Fusarium verticillioides [80]. Endophytic bacteria (Bacillus subtilis (KAS2), Bacillus tequilensis (KAS3), Pantoea stewartii (KAS4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (KAS6), and Bacillus velezensis (KAS7)) isolated from pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) showed significant antifungal activity against six kinds of fungal pathogens, among which KAS2, KAS3, and KAS7 contain at least one antifungal lipopeptide gene, and the lipopeptide group of KAS2 is verified to be able to protect seedlings from infection by Fusarium sp. [81]. A similar result was also observed for Lysinibacillus sp. and Paenibacillus dendritiformis colonization within maize seeds [82]. Although most Bacillus endophytes in seeds contain lipopeptide genes [83], not all of them are members of the genus, e.g., Pantoea and Pseudomonas (Table 1).

Fungal diseases can lead to significant decreases in crop yields, e.g., root rot, leaf spot, leaf blight, and pepper wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum [84]. Seed endophytes can effectively resist to these diseases. Verma et al. [85] showed that seed endophytes SLB4- Pseudomonas fluorescens, SLB6-Pseudomonas sp., and SY1-Pseudomonas sp. from Phragmites australis can effectively inhibit the infection of rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings by Fusarium oxysporum; among them, SY1 has the best inhibitory effect and contributes to the growth of roots and stems of rice. This indirect mechanism of promoting rice growth is because seed endophytes can produce HCN (hydrogen cyanide) volatiles and the antifungal genes prnD (pyrrolnitrin) and hcnBC (hydrogen cyanide).

The mechanism by which seed endophytes resist pathogens and promote plant growth involves other pathways, including ROS systems and the production of volatile compounds (Fig. 1). In a study on the use of local seed endophytic microbes to resist fungal diseases of Urochloa ramosa L. seedlings, it was confirmed that some seed endophytes can act as signal targets of the redox system (ROS) to regulate genes for inducing host plant defense [86]. In addition, 43% of Bacillus seed endophytes in gourds had antagonistic effects against many soil-borne pathogens (Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium graminearum) and oomycetes (Phytophthora capsici, Pythium aphanideratum), mainly through the release of volatile compounds such as acetyl and/or diacetyl that induce plant defense and the production of extracellular ribonuclease [87].

Resistance to herbivores and insects. Resistance to herbivores by seed endophytes has been confirmed in many studies, especially for tall fescue seed endophytes that produce mycotoxins (Fig. 1); nonetheless, most of the evidence comes from seed endophytic fungi belonging to a small clade of Clavicipitaceae (Table 1). For example, ergot alkaloids produced by seed endophytes can poison animals (such as cattle) after eating tall fescue [88]. The feeding study found that the mice were more likely to select seeds without infection by the endophytic microbe AR601, and possibly the endophytes were able to release some sort of secondary metabolite, such as ergovaline, which is effective in preventing the feeding of birds and rodents [89]. When red fescue (Festuca rubra) contains the seed endophyte Epichloë festucae, it is more likely to be infected by the pathogenic fungus Claviceps purpurea; interestingly, aphids (Sitobion sp.) are not found in most C. purpurea-infected plants because C. purpurea can produce alkaloids (e.g., ergocristine, ergovaline, ergotamine, and α-ergocryptine). Meanwhile, the endophyte E. festucae can also produce high concentrations of ergovaline. These interactions may account for controlling a certain number of insects and are beneficial to the plant growth of red fescue [17]. Furthermore, the endophytic fungus of Epichloë grass, Epichloë sylvatica, is transmitted by seeds during asexual reproduction, and it was found that when insect larvae were fed infected E. sylvatica of Brachypodium sylvaticum leaves, their diet was affected compared to feeding uninfected (E-) insects, suggesting that the endophytic fungus E. sylvatica produces a certain chemosensitive substance that increases the resistance of B. sylvaticum to herbivorous insects [90].

Improvement of Plant Resistance to Abiotic Stress

Plants are inevitably exposed to abiotic stresses during growth, and microorganisms present inside the seeds may be critical for improving plant stress resistance (Fig. 1).

Resistance to heavy metal stress. Currently, heavy metals cannot be completely degraded in plants, but some seed endophytes can modify the potential toxicity of metals to plants by altering the chemical form of metals through endophyte-mediated oxidation or reduction [91]. As the earliest endophytic microbes colonized by plants, seed endophytes have a potential function in improving plant tolerance to heavy metals and actively induce possible detoxification mechanisms in plants, such as antioxidant systems [92, 93]. There is evidence that the endophytic fungus FZT214 (Epicoccum nigrum) of Dysphania ambrosioides seeds can increase the chlorophyll and glutathione (GSH) content of host plants at different developmental stages and regulate the tolerance of host plants to Cd stress. On the other hand, the hormone produced by E. nigrum colonization in D. ambrosioides grown in metal-contaminated environments will also be an important mechanism to promote the growth of host plants [94]. Similarly, the endophyte of Neotyphodium in the seeds of Elymus dahuricus increased their resistance to the heavy metal Cd by affecting the activities of antioxidant enzymes (including ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase), proline, and malondialdehyde content [95]. In addition, the seed endophytic bacterium Serratia Nematodima LRE07 of Solanum nigrum L. could enhance plant uptake of essential mineral nutrients by reducing the toxicity of Cd and increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes [96]. However, the enhancement of this antioxidant system and the mechanisms involved are still not fully understood.

Lavandula pedunculata seeds collected in soils contaminated with high concentrations of metals show greater growth ability than those collected in uncontaminated areas, because endophytes colonizing in the seeds may maintain high GSH content under high metal stress to reduce oxidative stress and have potential environmental resilience [97]. When Agrostis capillaris grows in Cd/Ni-contaminated soil for a long time, its seed endophytic bacteria, Bacillus sp. and Pantoea sp., not only have the ability to increase phosphorus release and produce iron carriers but also benefit plant extraction (plants remove heavy metals or toxic compounds from the soil) and plant stability (plants fix metals or reduce the bioavailability of pollutants at different nutrient levels) [56]. In polymetallic contaminated soil, the seed endophyte Cryptococcus sp. CBSB78 can increase the absorption of Cd, Zn, and Pb by Brassica chinensis, thus reducing the content of heavy metals in soil [98]. Therefore, seed endophytes play an important auxiliary role in the phytoremediation of heavy metals.

Resistance to salt stress. Endophytes can effectively improve metabolic disorders of host plants caused by high salt stress and promote plant growth. A recent study showed that Pantoea sp. and Bacillus sp. members isolated from the seeds of three grasses and four leguminous forages could promote the germination rate of Medicago sativa under salt stress [99]. Members of Bacillus and Pantoea can also produce IAA (indole-3-acetic acid), antagonize fungi, and even have osmotic tolerance [74]. In addition, the endophytic fungus Fusarium verticillioides also reduced the effects of salt stress on plants by affecting lipid peroxidation and protein content [100].

Drought resistance. Under global climate change, drought is the main obstacle to increasing crop yield. There has been evidence that seed endophytes can improve the drought and heat tolerance of wheat [101, 102]. The endophytic microbe Kosakonia cowanii in the seeds of the xerophytic invasive plant Lactuca serriola can produce extracellular polysaccharides to maintain soil moisture and thus improve the adaptability of the host plant to drought; in addition, inoculating Arabidopsis thaliana with this bacterium can also effectively promote plant growth under drought conditions [103], suggesting that the drought tolerance of seed endophytes is not host species specific. Moreover, there is evidence that xerophytes seem to harbor endophytes resistant to drought, therefore, some researchers focus on isolating strains from drought-tolerant plants and inoculating them into other plant seeds, especially tomato, to improve the plant ability to tolerate drought [104].

Interestingly, climate change may affect seed quality and breeding practices in the agriculture, which in turn may impact seed microbial communities. Because plants are inconsistent in their ability to tolerate drought and heat, continued warming may prolong flowering and alter the depth of dormancy during seed maturation, preventing fundamental assurance of seed quality [105]. For example, Arabidopsis thaliana and Lolium perenne reduced dormancy times at high temperatures [106, 107]. Similarly, to find more suitable farming methods and planting sites, breeding practices for fighting climate change may change the chemical and physical properties of soil and indirectly lead to changes in endophyte communities [108].

Despite the growing evidence that seed endophytes play an important role in host plants for resisting environmental stress [78, 97, 99, 103], we still face many limitations and challenges in carrying out large-scale applications in the field of sustainable agriculture and natural ecosystems. In particular, there are several questions we must answer thus far, including: how can the target strains be obtained effectively and efficiently? Does a single strain function effectively? Is there any potential interaction between the functional strain and other microbes in the host plant? To date, many studies have explored the function and mechanism of the isolation and then inoculation of seed endophytes back on host plants, which depend on an effective culture technique for target endophytes. Common culture media used to isolate microbes may bias toward easy-growing seed endophytes, such as members of the family Bacillaceae, followed by Paenibacillaceae (Table 1). That is why endophytes in seeds have been continuously discovered by means of high-throughput sequencing techniques, but some species fail to be isolated and cultured from seeds [1, 20, 21]. To obtain a target strain, it may be effective to use selective media to cultivate species (or strains) that adapt to environmental stress [20, 57, 97]. Moreover, the current research focuses on seed bacteria rather than seed fungi. This is likely due to the ease with which seed-associated bacteria can participate in both endogenous phytohormone regulation and external regulation to promote plant growth by enhancing plant adaptation and inhibiting pathogen infestation [69, 75]. In addition, although the use of synthetic communities [109, 110] rather than a single strain should be considered to explore the possible phenotypic characteristics and functions of seed endophytes based on omics, it is a major challenge to understand the interaction between seed endophytes and host plants and other microbes, which is a complex process that may depend on endophyte species, environmental conditions, and gene types of host plants. For example, the interaction of seed fungi and bacteria with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Rhizophagus irrigularis) has a negative feedback effect on the growth of Trifolium repens, and this negative effect may be competition over resource allocation and temporal priority as well as the release of secondary metabolites [111]. Another study also elaborated that competition for photosynthetic products and plant resources could enable seed-borne Epichloë sp. to mitigate the negative effects of Ustilago bullata on Bromus auleticus [112]. Currently, studies on how seed endophytes interact with other microbes in the host plant are still rare, and more in-depth studies on the mechanisms of their interactions are needed in the future to achieve efficient and sustainable agricultural production by regulating the seed microbiota. Regarding this point, it is helpful to use omics, including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, genomics, and fluorescent tagging of target strains, to better understand the impacts of seed microbial interactions with other microbes in the host plant.

Conclusion

As a reproductive organ of plants, seeds are one of the most significant stages in the life history of plants [5] and carry a variety of endophytic microbes that can be transmitted to offspring through parental plants [6]. Undoubtedly, seed endophytes can greatly contribute to host plant resistance to environmental stress. In this article, we first provided a framework for the assembly and function of seed endophytes and discussed the sources and assembly process of seed endophytes; then, we reviewed the impact of environmental factors on the assembly of seed endophytes, and we explored recent advances in the growth promotion and stress resistance enhancement of plants, functioning by seed endophytes under various environmental stressors, including biotic (e.g., pathogens, herbivores and insects) and abiotic factors (e.g., drought, heavy metals and salt). Finally, we also give the limitations and challenges for applications of endophytic seed microbes in the field of sustainable agriculture and ecology. Our review is valuable for understanding the mechanisms of seed endophyte-host plant interactions and has important suggestions for seed endophyte applications, both in the field of sustainable agriculture and in natural ecosystems.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Major Science and Technology Project in Yunnan Province, PR China (grant No. 202001BB050001), and the Recommend Exempted Postgraduate Research and Innovation Fund Project of Yunnan University (grant No. 2021T083).

Footnotes

Author Contributions

H.Z., Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Supervision; Y.W., Funding acquisition; H.Z. and Y.W., Original draft, Review and editing.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Compant S, Mitter B, Colli-Mull JG, Gangl H, Sessitsch A. Endophytes of grapevine flowers, berries, and seeds: identification of cultivable bacteria, comparison with other plant parts, and visualization of niches of colonization. Microb. Ecol. 2011;62:188–197. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9883-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gazis R, Chaverri P. Diversity of fungal endophytes in leaves and stems of wild rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in Peru. Fugal Eol. 2010;3:240–254. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2009.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martínez-Arias C, Sobrino-Plata J, Medel D, Gil L, Martín JA, Rodríguez-Calcerrada J. Stem endophytes increase root development, photosynthesis, and survival of elm plantlets (Ulmus minor Mill.) J. Plant Physiol. 2021;261:153420. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tian B, Zhang C, Ye Y, Wen J, Wu Y, Wang H, et al. Beneficial traits of bacterial endophytes belonging to the core communities of the tomato root microbiome. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 2017;247:149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nelson EB. The seed microbiome: origins, interactions, and impacts. Plant Soil. 2018;422:7–34. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3289-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hodgson S, de Cates C, Hodgson J, Morley NJ, Sutton BC, Gange AC. Vertical transmission of fungal endophytes is widespread in forbs. Ecol. Evol. 2014;4:1199–1208. doi: 10.1002/ece3.953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kinge TR, Cason ED, Valverde A, Nyaga M, Gryzenhout M. Endophytic seed mycobiome of six sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cultivars from commercial seedlots using an Illumina sequencing approach. Mycosphere. 2019;10:739–756. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Elsas JD. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:463–471. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shade A, Jacques MA, Barret M. Ecological patterns of seed microbiome diversity, transmission, and assembly. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017;37:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang W, Mace WJ, Matthew C, Card SD. The impact of endophyte infection, seed aging, and imbibition on selected sugar metabolite concentrations in seed. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019;67:6921–6929. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Truyens S, Weyens N, Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J. Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2015;7:40–50. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Vujanovic V, Germida JJ. Seed endosymbiosis: a vital relationship in providing prenatal care to plants. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2017;97:972–981. doi: 10.1139/CJPS-2016-0261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guo J, Bowatte S, Hou F. Diversity of endophytic bacteria and fungi in seeds of Elymus nutans growing in four locations of Qinghai Tibet Plateau, China. Plant Soil. 2021;459:49–63. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04608-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shahzad R, Waqas M, Khan AL, Al-Hosni K, Kang SM, Seo CW, et al. Indoleacetic acid production and plant growth promoting potential of bacterial endophytes isolated from rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds. Acta Biol. Hungarica. 2017;68:175–186. doi: 10.1556/018.68.2017.2.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Samreen T, Naveed M, Nazir MZ, Asghar HN, Khan MI, Zahir ZA, et al. Seed associated bacterial and fungal endophytes: diversity, life cycle, transmission, and application potential. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021;168:104191. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barret M, Briand M, Bonneau S, Preveaux A, Valiere S, Bouchez O, et al. Emergence shapes the structure of the seed microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:1257–1266. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03722-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Laihonen M, Saikkonen K, Helander M, Vázquez de Aldana BR, Zabalgogeazcoa I, Fuchs B. Epichloë endophyte-promoted seed pathogen increases host grass resistance against insect herbivory. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:786619. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.786619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ganley RJ, Newcombe G. Fungal endophytes in seeds and needles of Pinus monticola. Mycol. Res. 2006;110:318–327. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2005.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Forte F, Schmid J, Dijkwel P, Nagy I, Hume D, Johnson R, et al. Fungal endophyte colonization patterns alter over time in the novel association between Lolium perenne and Epichloë endophyte AR37. Front. Plant Sci. 2020;11:570026. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.570026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lahiri A, Murphy BR, Hodkinson TR. Assessing genotypic and environmental effects on endophyte communities of fraxinus (Ash) using culture dependent and Independent DNA sequencing. J. Fungi. 2021;7:565. doi: 10.3390/jof7070565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thomas P, Shaik S. Molecular profiling on surface-disinfected tomato seeds reveals high diversity of cultivation-recalcitrant endophytic bacteria with low shares of spore-forming firmicutes. Microb. Ecol. 2020;79:910–924. doi: 10.1007/s00248-019-01440-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bastías DA, Bustos LB, Jáuregui R, Barrera A, Acuña-Rodríguez IS, Molina-Montenegro MA, et al. Epichloë fungal endophytes influence seed-associated bacterial communities. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:795354. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.795354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Girsowicz R, Moroenyane I, Steinberger Y. Bacterial seed endophyte community of annual plants modulated by plant photosynthetic pathways. Microbiol. Res. 2019;223:58–62. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2019.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abdelaal K, AlKahtani M, Attia K, Hafez Y, Király L, Künstler A. The role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in alleviating the adverse effects of drought on plants. Biology (Basel) 2021;10:520. doi: 10.3390/biology10060520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tenorio Berrío R, Nelissen H, Inzé D, Dubois M. Increasing yield on dry fields: molecular pathways with growing potential. Plant J. 2022;109:323–341. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Misganaw G, Simachew A, Gessesse A. Endophytes of finger millet (Eleusine coracana) seeds. Symbiosis. 2019;78:203–213. doi: 10.1007/s13199-019-00607-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Newman LA, Reynolds CM. Bacteria and phytoremediation: new uses for endophytic bacteria in plants. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23:6–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arenas-Lago D, Santos ES, Carvalho LC, Abreu MM, Andrade ML. Cistus monspeliensis L. as a potential species for rehabilitation of soils with multielemental contamination under Mediterranean conditions. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. Int. 2018;25:6443–6455. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0957-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gaiero JR, McCall CA, Thompson KA, Day NJ, Best AS, Dunfield KE. Inside the root microbiome: bacterial root endophytes and plant growth promotion. Am. J. Bot. 2013;100:1738–1750. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vorholt JA. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012;10:828–840. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu H, Brettell LE, Singh B. Linking the phyllosphere microbiome to plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25:841–844. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Franco C. Sustainable agricultural crop production by endophytic actinobacteria. J. Biotechnol. 2010;150:S290–S290. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.09.234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mei C, Amaradasa BS, Chretien RL, Liu D, Snead G, Samtani JB, et al. A potential application of endophytic bacteria in strawberry production. Horticulturae. 2021;7:504. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7110504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol. 2015;206:1196–1206. doi: 10.1111/nph.13312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Frank A, Guzmán J, Shay J. Transmission of bacterial endophytes. Microorganisms. 2017;5:70. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5040070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rudgers JA, Afkhami ME, Rua MA, Davitt AJ, Hammer S, Huguet VM. A fungus among us: broad patterns of endophyte distribution in the grasses. Ecology. 2009;90:1531–1539. doi: 10.1890/08-0116.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gagne-Bourgue F, Aliferis KA, Seguin P, Rani M, Samson R, Jabaji S. Isolation and characterization of indigenous endophytic bacteria associated with leaves of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013;114:836–853. doi: 10.1111/jam.12088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ngugi HK, Scherm H. Biology of flower-infecting fungi. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006;44:261–282. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Perry DA. Seedborne diseases and their control: principles and practice. by R. B. Maude. Wallingford, UK: CAB INTERNATIONAL (1996), pp. 280., £40.00. ISBN 0-85198-922-5. Exper. Agric. 1997;33:385–387. doi: 10.1017/S0014479797253123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shahzad R, Khan AL, Bilal S, Asaf S, Lee IJ. What is there in seeds? Vertically transmitted endophytic resources for sustainable improvement in plant growth. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:24. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Newcombe G, Harding A, Ridout M, Busby PE. A hypothetical bottleneck in the plant microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1645. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Aschehoug ET, Metlen KL, Callaway RM, Newcombe G. Fungal endophytes directly increase the competitive effects of an invasive forb. Ecology. 2012;93:3–8. doi: 10.1890/11-1347.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abdelfattah A, Tack AJM, Lobato C, Wassermann B, Berg G. From seed to seed: the role of microbial inheritance in the assembly of the plant microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 2023;31:346–355. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bergmann GE, Leveau JHJ. A metacommunity ecology approach to understanding microbial community assembly in developing plant seeds. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:877519. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.877519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fort T, Pauvert C, Zanne AE, Ovaskainen O, Caignard T, Barret M, et al. Maternal effects shape the seed mycobiome in Quercus petraea. New Phytol. 2021;230:1594–1608. doi: 10.1111/nph.17153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhou J, Ning D. Stochastic community assembly: does it matter in microbial ecology? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2017;81:e00002–17. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00002-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kim H, Kim C, Lee Y-H. The single-seed microbiota reveals rare taxa-associated community robustness. Phytobiomes J. 2023 doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-10-22-0068-R. oi.org/10.1094/PBIOMES-10-22-0068-R. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chesneau G, Laroche B, Preveaux A, Marais C, Briand M, Marolleau B, et al. mBio. 2022;13:e0164822. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01648-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kim H, Jeon J, Lee KK, Lee Y-H. Longitudinal transmission of bacterial and fungal communities from seed to seed in rice. Commun. Biol. 2022;5:772. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03726-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Prado A, Marolleau B, Vaissière BE, Barret M, Torres-Cortes G. Insect pollination: an ecological process involved in the assembly of the seed microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:3575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60591-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chesneau G, Laroche B, Préveaux A, Marais C, Briand M, Marolleau B, et al. Single seed microbiota: assembly and transmission from parent plant to seedling. mBio. 2022;13:e0164822. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01648-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rezki S, Campion C, Simoneau P, Jacques M-A, Shade A, Barret M. Assembly of seed-associated microbial communities within and across successive plant generations. Plant Soil. 2018;422:67–79. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3451-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cankar K, Kraigher H, Ravnikar M, Rupnik M. Bacterial endophytes from seeds of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005;244:341–345. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mundt JO, Hinkle NF. Bacteria within ovules and seeds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1976;32:694–698. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.5.694-698.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Truyens S, Weyens N, Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J. Changes in the population of seed bacteria of transgenerationally Cdexposed Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biol. 2013;15:971–981. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00711.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Truyens S, Jambon I, Croes S, Janssen J, Weyens N, Mench M, et al. The effect of long-term Cd and Ni exposure on seed endophytes of Agrostis capillaris and their potential application in phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soils. Int. J. Phytoremediation. 2014;16:643–659. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2013.837027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Croes S, Weyens N, Janssen J, Vercampt H, Colpaert JV, Carleer R, et al. Bacterial communities associated with Brassica napus L. grown on trace element-contaminated and non-contaminated fields: a genotypic and phenotypic comparison. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013;6:371–384. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Walitang DI, Kim CG, Kim K, Kang Y, Kim YK, Sa T. The influence of host genotype and salt stress on the seed endophytic community of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant rice cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18:51. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1261-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bintarti AF, Kearns PJ, Sulesky-Grieb A, Shade A. Abiotic treatment to common bean plants results in an altered endophytic seed microbiome. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022;10:e0021021. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00210-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hone H, Mann R, Yang G, Kaur J, Tannenbaum I, Li T, et al. Profiling, isolation and characterisation of beneficial microbes from the seed microbiomes of drought tolerant wheat. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:11916. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91351-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Welty RE, Azevedo MD, Cooper TM. Influence of moisture-content, temperature, and length of storage on seed-germination and survival of endophytic fungi in seeds of tall fescue and perennial ryegrass. Phytopathology. 1987;77:893–900. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-77-893. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wijewardana C, Reddy KR, Krutz LJ, Gao W, Bellaloui N. Drought stress has transgenerational effects on soybean seed germination and seedling vigor. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Langeroudi AR, Radicetti E, Campiglia E. How cover crop residue management and herbicide rate affect weed management and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) crop. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2018;34:1–9. doi: 10.1017/S1742170518000054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.van Esse HP, Reuber TL, van der Does D. Genetic modification to improve disease resistance in crops. New Phytol. 2020;225:70–86. doi: 10.1111/nph.15967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Peixoto RS, Voolstra CR, Sweet M, Duarte CM, Carvalho S, Villela H, et al. Harnessing the microbiome to prevent global biodiversity loss. Nat. Microbiol. 2022;7:1726–1735. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01173-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cohen A, Travaglia C, Bottini R, Piccoli P. Participation of abscisic acid and gibberellins produced by endophytic Azospirillum in the alleviation of drought effects in maize. Bot. 2009;87:455–462. doi: 10.1139/B09-023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Waqas M, Khan AL, Kamran M, Hamayun M, Kang SM, Kim YH, et al. Endophytic fungi produce gibberellins and indoleacetic acid and promotes host-plant growth during stress. Molecules. 2012;17:10754–10773. doi: 10.3390/molecules170910754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Diaz Herrera S, Grossi C, Zawoznik M, Daniela Groppa M. Wheat seeds harbour bacterial endophytes with potential as plant growth promoters and biocontrol agents of Fusarium graminearum. Microbiol. Res. 2016;186:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Shahzad R, Waqas M, Khan AL, Asaf S, Khan MA, Kang S-M, et al. Seed-borne endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RWL-1 produces gibberellins and regulates endogenous phytohormones of Oryza sativa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016;106:236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Qin Y, Pan X, Yuan Z. Seed endophytic microbiota in a coastal plant and phytobeneficial properties of the fungus Cladosporium cladosporioides. Fungal Ecol. 2016;24:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.08.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Khalaf EM, Raizada MN. Taxonomic and functional diversity of cultured seed associated microbes of the cucurbit family. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16:131. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0743-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Xu M, Sheng J, Chen L, Men Y, Gan L, Guo S, et al. Bacterial community compositions of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) seeds and plant growth promoting activity of ACC deaminase producing Bacillus subtilis (HYT-12-1) on tomato seedlings. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;30:835–845. doi: 10.1007/s11274-013-1486-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Esther Puente M, Li CY, Bashan Y. Rock-degrading endophytic bacteria in cacti. Environ. Exper. Bot. 2009;66:389–401. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.04.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Walitang DI, Kim K, Madhaiyan M, Kim YK, Kang Y, Sa T. Characterizing endophytic competence and plant growth promotion of bacterial endophytes inhabiting the seed endosphere of rice. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17:209. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1117-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Shao J, Miao Y, Liu K, Ren Y, Xu Z, Zhang N, et al. Rhizosphere microbiome assembly involves seed-borne bacteria in compensatory phosphate solubilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021;159:108273. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108273. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.de Voogd NJ, Cleary DFR, Polonia ARM, Gomes NCM. Bacterial community composition and predicted functional ecology of sponges, sediment and seawater from the thousand islands reef complex, West Java, Indonesia. FEMS Microbiol. 2015;91:fiv019. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sanchez-Lopez AS, Thijs S, Beckers B, Carmen Gonzalez-Chavez M, Weyens N, Carrillo-Gonzalez R, et al. Community structure and diversity of endophytic bacteria in seeds of three consecutive generations of Crotalaria pumila growing on metal mine residues. Plant Soil. 2018;422:51–66. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3176-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Matsumoto H, Fan X, Wang Y, Kusstatscher P, Duan J, Wu S, et al. Bacterial seed endophyte shapes disease resistance in rice. Nat. Plants. 2021;7:60–72. doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-00826-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.White JF, Kingsley KI, Kowalski KP, Irizarry I, Micci A, Soares MA, et al. Disease protection and allelopathic interactions of seed-transmitted endophytic pseudomonads of invasive reed grass (Phragmites australis) Plant Soil. 2018;422:195–208. doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3169-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yang F, Zhang R, Wu X, Xu T, Ahmad S, Zhang X, et al. An endophytic strain of the genus Bacillus isolated from the seeds of maize (Zea mays L.) has antagonistic activity against maize pathogenic strains. Microb. Pathog. 2020;142:104074. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kumar K, Verma A, Pal G, White JF, Verma SK. Seed endophytic bacteria of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) promote seedling development and defend against a fungal phytopathogen. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:774293. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.774293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Pal G, Kumar K, Verma A, Verma SK. Seed inhabiting bacterial endophytes of maize promote seedling establishment and provide protection against fungal disease. Microbiol. Res. 2022;255:126926. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2021.126926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ongena M, Jacques P. Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gao M, Xiong C, Gao C, Tsui CKM, Wang M-M, Zhou X, et al. Disease-induced changes in plant microbiome assembly and functional adaptation. Microbiome. 2021;9:187. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01138-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Verma SK, Kingsley KL, Bergen MS, Kowalski KP, White JF. Fungal disease prevention in seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa) and other grasses by growth-promoting seed-associated endophytic bacteria from invasive Phragmites australis. Microorganisms. 2018;6:21. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6010021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Verma SK, White JF. Indigenous endophytic seed bacteria promote seedling development and defend against fungal disease in browntop millet (Urochloa ramosa L.) J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018;124:764–778. doi: 10.1111/jam.13673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Khalaf EM, Raizada MN. Bacterial seed endophytes of domesticated cucurbits antagonize fungal and oomycete pathogens including powdery mildew (Vol. 9, 42, 2018) Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:42. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Melchior EA, Smith JK, Schneider LG, Mulliniks JT, Bates GE, Flythe MD, et al. Effects of endophyte-infected tall fescue seed and red clover isoflavones on rumen microbial populations and physiological parameters of beef cattle. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2019;3:315–328. doi: 10.1093/tas/txy147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Finch S, Pennell C, Kerby J, Cave V. Mice find endophyte-infected seed of tall fescue unpalatable - implications for the aviation industry. Grass Forage Sci. 2015;71 doi: 10.1111/gfs.12203. doi: 10.1111/gfs.12203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Brem D, Leuchtmann A. Epichloë grass endophytes increase herbivore resistance in the woodland grass Brachypodium sylvaticum. Oecologia. 2001;126:522–530. doi: 10.1007/s004420000551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Roane T, Pepper I, Gentry T. Microorganisms and metal pollutants. 2015. pp. 415–439. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Liu D, Cui Y, Walcott R, Díaz-Pérez J, Tishchenko V, Chen J. Transmission of human enteric pathogens from artificiallyinoculated flowers to vegetable sprouts/seedlings developed via contaminated seeds. Food Control. 2018;99:21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.12.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wang J-l, Li T, Liu G-y, Smith JM, Zhao Z-w. Unraveling the role of dark septate endophyte (DSE) colonizing maize (Zea mays) under cadmium stress: physiological, cytological and genic aspects. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:22028. doi: 10.1038/srep22028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Parmar S, Sharma VK, Li T, Tang W, Li H. Fungal seed endophyte FZT214 improves Dysphania ambrosioides Cd tolerance throughout different developmental Stages. Front. Microbiol. 2022;12:783475. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.783475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zhang X, Li C, Nan Z. Effects of cadmium stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Elymus dahuricus infected with the Neotyphodium> endophyte. Sci. China Life Sci. 2012;55:793–799. doi: 10.1007/s11427-012-4359-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wan Y, Luo S, Chen J, Xiao X, Chen L, Zeng G, et al. Effect of endophyte-infection on growth parameters and Cd-induced phytotoxicity of Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Chemosphere. 2012;89:743–750. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Arenas-Lago D, Carvalho LC, Santos ES, Abreu MM. Influence of seed source and soil contamination on ecophysiological responses of Lavandula pedunculata in rehabilitation of mining areas. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 2021;11:105. doi: 10.3390/plants11010105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Deng Z, Wang W, Tan H, Cao L. Characterization of heavy metal-resistant endophytic yeast Cryptococcus sp. CBSB78 from rapes (Brassica chinensis) and its potential in promoting the growth of Brassica spp. in metal-contaminated soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223:5321–5329. doi: 10.1007/s11270-012-1282-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Dai Y, Li X-Y, Wang Y, Li C-X, He Y, Lin H-H, et al. The differences and overlaps in the seed-resident microbiome of four Leguminous and three Gramineous forages. Microbiol. Biol. 2020;13:1461–1476. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Radhakrishnan R, Khan AL, Lee I-J. Endophytic fungal pre-treatments of seeds alleviates salinity stress effects in soybean plants. J. Microbiol. 2013;51:850–857. doi: 10.1007/s12275-013-3168-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Hubbard M, Germida J, Vujanovic V. Fungal endophytes improve wheat seed germination under heat and drought stress. Bot. 2012;90:137–149. doi: 10.1139/b11-091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hubbard M, Germida JJ, Vujanovic V. Fungal endophytes enhance wheat heat and drought tolerance in terms of grain yield and second-generation seed viability. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014;116:109–122. doi: 10.1111/jam.12311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Jeong S, Kim T-M, Choi B, Kim Y, Kim E. Invasive Lactuca serriola seeds contain endophytic bacteria that contribute to drought tolerance. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:13307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92706-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.La Fua J, Sabaruddin L, Santiaji Bande LO, Leomo S, Kade Sutariati GA, Khaeruni A, et al. Isolation of drought-tolerant endophyte bacteria from local tomato plants. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2021;24:1055–1062. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2021.1055.1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bailly C, Roldan MVG. Impact of climate perturbations on seeds and seed quality for global agriculture. Biochem. J. 2023;480:177–196. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20220246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Fernandez R, Chantre GR, Renzi JP. Seed dormancy of Lolium perenne L. related to the maternal environment during seed filling. Seed Sci. Res. 2021;31:217–223. doi: 10.1017/S0960258521000155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Huang Z, Footitt S, Finch-Savage WE. The effect of temperature on reproduction in the summer and winter annual Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes Bur and Cvi. Annal. Bot. 2014;113:921–929. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sloat LL, Davis SJ, Gerber JS, Moore FC, Ray DK, West PC, et al. Climate adaptation by crop migration. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1243. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15076-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Di S, Yang A. Analysis of productivity and stability of synthetic microbial communities. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2019;16:20180859. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Pradhan S, Tyagi R, Sharma S. Combating biotic stresses in plants by synthetic microbial communities: principles, applications and challenges. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022;133:2742–2759. doi: 10.1111/jam.15799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Idbella M, Bonanomi G, De Filippis F, Amor G, Chouyia FE, Fechtali T, et al. Contrasting effects of Rhizophagus irregularis versus bacterial and fungal seed endophytes on Trifolium repens plant-soil feedback. Mycorrhiza. 2021;31:103–115. doi: 10.1007/s00572-020-01003-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Iannone LJ, Vignale MV, Pinget AD, Re A, Mc Cargo PD, Novas MV. Seed-transmitted Epichloe sp. endophyte alleviates the negative effects of head smut of grasses (Ustilago bullata) on Bromus auleticus. Fungal Ecol. 2017;29:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2017.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology

RESOURCES