Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Oct 5;17(10):e0011686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011686

Determinants of podoconiosis among residents of Machakle District East Gojjam Zone Amhara Region Ethiopia

Teshome Tefera 1, Kassawmar Angaw Bogale 1, Yiteka Tegegn 1, Abebaw Gedef Azene 1, Kebadnew Mulatu 1, Gizachew Tadesse Wassie 1,*
Editor: Victor S Santos2
PMCID: PMC10581460  PMID: 37797041

Abstract

Background

Podoconiosis (endemic non-filarial elephantiasis) is a chronic disease characterized by the development of persistent swelling of plantar foot initially; which progresses to the dorsal foot and lower leg slowly or in a number of acute episodes to reach the knee. About 4 million people are said to be affected by the disease worldwide and it is deemed a serious public health problem in at least 10 African countries including Ethiopia. Therefore this study aimed to identify the determinants of podoconiosis among residence in Machakel district.

Method

Unmatched case control study design was conducted at Machakel district from August 30 to September 30, 2022. The sample size calculated using Epi-info software yielded 211 controls and 106 cases (317 study participants). Simple random sampling technique was used to select the cases using registration books of the district. Data were entered to Epi info version 7 and exported to SPSS version 22 for statistical analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to identify explanatory variables.

Result

A total of 312 study participants (104 cases and 208 controls) were included giving a response rate of 98.42%. Bare foot (AOR, 5.83 [95% CI: 2.34–14.50]), female sex (AOR, 4.25 [95% CI: 2.22–8.14]), family history of podoconiosis (AOR: 3.01(95% CI: 1.41–6.42) and age group 41–60 (AOR: 5.05(95% CI: 2.35–10.83), and 61–80 AOR 15.74 95% CI: (5.56–44.55) were determinants of Podoconiosis.

Conclusion and recommendation

Barefoot, sex, family history of podoconiosis and age were determinants of Podoconiosis. District health office should encourage at risk populations especially older people and individuals with family history of podoconiosis about shoe wearing practice all the time and not to expose their skin and feet.

Author summary

Podoconiosis is a chronic neglected tropical disease that causes swelling in the feet and legs. It can lead to lifelong disabilities and is preventable. This research aimed to identify the factors that contribute to the development of podoconiosis among people in Machakle District East Gojjam Zone Amhara Region Ethiopia. The study found that regularly walking barefoot, having a family history of podoconiosis, being female, and being older were all risk factors for the disease. The findings suggest that promoting the use of shoes, especially among females, should be a priority in healthcare efforts to eliminate podoconiosis in Ethiopia and other similar settings.

Introduction

Podoconiosis is a chronic disease characterized by the development of persistent swelling of plantar foot initially; which progresses to the dorsal foot and lower leg slowly or in a number of acute episodes to reach the knee. Finally, the disease may end up in a permanent feature of elephantiasis of varying degree. The disease is common in families of barefooted agriculturalists of tropical Africa [1].

Podoconiosis (from the Greek word for foot: podos, and dust: konos) is unique in being an entirely preventable non-communicable tropical disease, usually crystalline blockage of the limb lymphatic, almost always affecting the lower limbs, especially the feet. In local communities, it is often called ‘mossy foot disease’, because the skin becomes rough and bumpy and its appearance resembles moss [2].

Podoconiosis has a curable pre-elephantiasis phase. However, once elephantiasis is established, podoconiosis persists and may cause lifelong disability[3]. Podoconiosis (endemic non- filarial elephantiasis) has been recognized as a specific disease entity for over one thousand years and it is widespread in tropical Africa, Central America and north India, Indonesia, Colombia, Ecuador, Brazil and Sri Lanka yet, it remains a neglected and under-researched condition [4,5].

Podoconiosis (endemic non-filarial elephantiasis) is a geochemical disease occurring in individuals exposed to red clay soil of volcanic origin [6]. The disease causes bilateral, but asymmetrical swelling almost invariably of the lower legs [7]. Early symptoms of podoconiosis include itching of the skin of the forefoot and recurrent episodes of burning and oedema of the foot or lower leg, especially after periods of intense physical activity [8].

Although the aetiology is not fully understood, existing scientific evidence suggests the important role of exposure to irritant red clay soil in endemic areas as well as the effect of genetic susceptibility [9]. Podoconiosis is found in highland areas of tropical Africa, Central America and north-west India. Areas of high prevalence have been documented in Uganda [10], Tanzania [11], Kenya [12], Rwanda, Burundi, Sudan and Ethiopia [13], and in Equatorial Guinea [14], Cameroon [15], the islands of Bioko, Sao Tome & Principe [16] and the Cape Verde islands. And it is related to poverty. Studies have also indicated that podoconiosis exists in areas where the altitude is above 1000meters above sea level and annual rainfall above 1000 millimetres. About 4 million people are said to be affected by the disease worldwide and it is deemed a serious public health problem in at least 10 African countries [1,17,18,19].

Podoconiosis follows a chronic course causing progressively increasing disability with continued exposure to irritant soils. It results in bilateral progressive chronic swelling of the lower legs, usually limited below the level of the knees. The pathogenesis of the disease has not yet been investigated in depth, but it is believed to be caused by fine particles in the soil that penetrate the skin and induce an inflammatory reaction in the lymphatic system [20]. However, early stage disease can easily be treated by foot hygiene, bandaging and shoes.

Podoconiosis is classified into five stages where the first stage swelling is limited to below the ankle and is reversible overnight. The second stage swelling is not reversible, and when bumps and knobs are present they remain below the level of the ankle. In the third stage of the disease, bumps and knobs are found above the level of the ankle. The fourth stage entails above knee swelling whereas the fifth stage involves joint fixation as a result of surrounding soft tissue overgrowth [20].

Podoconiosis has recently been included in the World Health Organization’s Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) list [21]. Areas of high prevalence of podoconiosis have been documented in tropical Africa, Central America and north India [22]. Of affected countries, Ethiopia appears to have the highest number of people with podoconiosis, with 11 million people at risk through exposure to irritant soil, and an estimated 1 million people affected countrywide [23,24]. In Ethiopia, prevalence estimates range from 2.8 to 7.4% in endemic areas [2326]. Podoconiosis can be prevented, early forms of the disease can be treated, and disease progression can be controlled with simple but effective measures such as washing feet with soap and water on a regular basis and wearing protective shoes consistently [1]. Hence this study aimed to study the determinants of podoconiosis in Machakel district Ethiopia.

Methods and materials

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical clearance issues of this study were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee (IRB) of the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University with the ethical clearance reference number of 523/2022. Permission letter was also obtained from Amhara Public Health Institute (APHI) before the actual data collection; permission was taken from East Gojjam zone health department and Machakel woreda health office. Written informed consent was taken for each participant. Confidentiality was kept and their name was changed to codes.

Study area

This study was conducted in Machakel district. Machakel district is one of the districts in East Gojjam zone, Amhara national Regional State. It is found at a distance of 328 km North West from Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia, 237 km far from Bahir Dar, the capital city of Amhara Region. Machakel woreda is bordered on the North by Bibugn district, on the South by Debre Elias district, on the Northwest by Sinan, on the Southwest by Gozamen and on the East by Dembecha (West Gojjam).According to the 2022 projected census 2007, the total population is 146,942 from which about 73,618(50.1%) are female and 73,324(49.9%) male population. Machakel district has 30 kebeles. In the Machakel district, there are 24 health posts and six health centres all are providing health service.

Study design and period

Unmatched case control study design was conducted from August 30 to September 30, 2022.

Source and study population

All resident of Machakel district were the source population. Whereas the study population was all adult patients age 18 years and older that were identified and registered as podoconiosis case by the district and neighbouring individuals without podoconiosis.

Cases: Were person of age 18 years and older, resided in any kebeles of Machakel district and who had been diagnosed and registered as podoconiosis case by the district.

Controls: Were persons age 18 years and older who did not have podoconiosis after clinically diagnosed by clinical nurses and who lives in the neighbouring house to podoconiosis patients (case).

Sample size determination

The sample size was calculated using Epi-info 7 software based on the assumption of 95% confidence interval, 85% power, control to case ratio of 2:1, presence of exposed family history among controls 11.4%, odds ratio to be detected as 2.81[15] and non-response rate of 10% yielding 211 controls and 106 cases (317 study participants).

Sampling techniques

Simple random sampling technique was used to select the cases from podoconiosis registration books of Machakel woreda health office as a sampling frame and control groups from the neighbouring of the cases.

Variables

Dependent variable

Podoconiosis (yes/no)

Independent variables: The following variables were identified from different previous studies and assessed in the current study.

Socio-demographic Characteristics such as: Age, Sex, Residence, Income, Educational status, and Occupation.

Behavioural related factors: Feet washing and Shoe Wearing practices.

Family history of podoconiosis: It was whether the participants had podoconiosis case from either of 1rst degree, 2nd degree, 3rd degree or others family members or not.

Operational definitions

Feet washing: It is the status of patients’ daily wash practice of their feet with soap.

Have enough water for washing: It is the participants’ perceived response whether water is always available for washing or not.

Barefoot: It is a status of participants not wearing any type of shoe every day.

Family history: History of podoconiosis in the family clustering, such as,1st degree (parents, child), 2nd degree (grandparents, siblings), 3rd degree (aunt, uncle, nephew, cousin, niece), other (husband and wife) [11].

Shoe wearing: wearing a full covering shoe every day during each activity.

Data collection tools and techniques

Data were collected using interviewer administered questionnaire prepared in English language and translated into Amharic language for the purpose of community level and back to English language for checking consistency. Data was collected by clinical nurses.

Data quality control

Questionnaire were prepared in English version by reviewing different literatures and translated in to Amharic (local language) and back to English by different language experts for consistency. Steps were taken to ensure the quality of this work. Pre-test was conducted on 16(5%) study participants in another district and necessary corrections were made on the questionnaire. The supervisors and principal investigator closely followed the day to day data collection process to ensure completeness and consistency of the collected questionnaires on a daily basis. Training was given for the data collectors and supervisors, and the whole data collection process was closely supervised.

Data processing and analysis

Prior to analysis, the whole data was cleaned and checked for completeness. Errors related to inconsistency were verified using cross tabulation and other data exploration methods. The data was entered into Epi-Info version 7.2.1.0 software packages then transferred to SPSS version 22 software for analysis. Descriptive statistics was used to give a clear picture of background variables like age, sex, and other variables. The frequency distribution of both dependent and independent variables were done. Binary logistic regression was used to identify the determinants of podoconiosis with the outcome variable. Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to check goodness of fit of the model. Variables having an association with the outcome variable a p-value of less than 0.2 were considered in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals were used to show association between explanatory variables and a dependent variable. Those independent variables with P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant factors associated with outcome variable.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants

A total of 312 participants (104 cases and 208 controls) were included, representing a response rate of 98.42%. The mean age of respondents was 47.21 years (SD = 11.47 years). Nearly two third, 229(73.32%) were farmers by occupation. The mean age of the cases was 53.8 years (SD = 15.43 years). Female constitute 67.30% of cases, 58(55.76%) of cases had family history of podoconiosis, the proportion of bare foot among cases was 30.76% and 76.92% of cases cannot read and write. The mean age of controls was 43.88 years (SD = 9.5 years). Having family history of podoconiosis was recorded in (57.69%), bare foot (11.53%), female (44.71%) and being a farmer occupation constitutes (71.15%) of controls (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants in Machakel district North-West Ethiopia, 2022.

Variables Category Cases (n (%)) Controls (n (%))
Sex Male 34(54.8) 115(60)
Female 70(45.19) 93(44.71)
Age 21–40 14(13.46) 93(44.71)
41–60 63(60.57) 101(48.55)
61–80 27(25.96) 14(6.73)
Residence Urban 16(15.38) 29(13.9)
Rural 88(84.6) 179(86.05)
Marital status Unmarried+ 32(30.7) 13(6.25)
Married 72(69.23) 195(93.75)
Occupation Merchant 4(3.8) 11(5.25)
Farmer 81(77.88) 148(71.15)
House wife 16(15.38) 47(22.59)
Education Cannot read and write 80(76.92) 112(53.84)
Can read and write 21(20.19) 67(32.21)
Primary 2(1.92) 28(13.65)
Higher education 1(0.96) 0(0)
Income(Ethiopian Birr) 500–1500 48(46.15) 48(23.41)
1501–3500 43(41.34) 118(57.56)
>3500 13(12.5) 42(20.2)

Behavioural related factors of participants

The proportion of bare foot in cases was 32(30.76%) whereas it was 24(11.53%) among controls. About 84(80.76%) of cases and 188(90.38%) of controls did wash their feet 6–8 times per week without soap and 52(50%) of cases, and 152(73.07%) of controls did wash their feet 6–8 times per week with soap.

Among cases, 26(25%) and 9(8.6%) did wear shoes at work and at home respectively. Whereas 88(42.30%) and 38(18.26%) wear shoes at work and at home respectively among controls. About twelve percent 12 (11.5%) of cases and 120(57.69%) of controls started shoe wearing between one to 20 years of age. More than half 58(55.76%) of cases and 120(57.69%) controls had a family history of podoconiosis (Table 2).

Table 2. Behavioural related factors of podoconiosis in Machakel district North-West Ethiopia, 2022.

Characteristics Category Cases (n (%)) Controls (n (%))
Having enough water for washing No
Yes
104(100) 208(100)
Washing feet without soap per week 1–2 times 2(1.92) 0(0)
3–5 times 17(16.34) 13(6.25)
6–8 times 84(80.76) 188(90.38)
>8 1(0.96) 7(3.36)
Washing feet per week with soap 1–2 times 5(4.80) 10(4.80)
3–5 times 33(31.73) 35(16.82)
6–8 times 52(50) 152(73.07)
>8 0(0) 2(0.96)
Barefooted habit Yes 32(30.76) 24(11.53)
No 72(69.23) 184(88.46)
Starting year of shoe wearing 1–20 year 12(11.53) 120(57.69)
21–40 year 53(50.96) 59(28.36)
41–60 7(6.73) 5(2.40)
Years with shoe wearing since starting All years 30(28.84) 181(87.01)
More than half of the years 22(21.15) 2(0.96)
Less than Half of the years 20(20.00) 1(0.48)
Number of days in a week wearing shoe Every day 47(45.19) 194(93.26)
More than 5 day 22(21.15) 4(1.95)
2–5 day 35(33.65) 10(4.80)
Where did you wear your shoes At work place
At home
26(25)
9(8.6)
88(42.30)
38(18.26)

Factors associated with Podoconiosis

Being barefooted, sex, family history of podoconiosis, occupation, marital status, age and ownership of a pair of shoes were associated with Podoconiosis in the uni-variable binary logistic regression analysis at p values< 0.25.

In multivariable logistic regression analysis: sex, being barefooted, family history of podoconiosis and age were associated with Podoconiosis with 95% CI, at a p-value <0.05 statistical significance level. The goodness-of-fit statistics for the model were assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test; and the p-value was 0.97.

The odds of having Podoconiosis were 5.83 times higher among barefooted persons (AOR 5.83, 95% CI: 2.34–14.5) than whose who wore shoes. The odds of having Podoconiosis were 4.25 times higher in females (AOR 4.25: 95% CI: 2.22–8.14) than in males. Besides, the odds of having Podoconiosis were 3.01 times higher among participants those who had a family history of podoconiosis (AOR = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.41–6.42) compared with who had no a family history of podoconiosis. Furthermore, the odds of having podoconiosis were 2.05 times higher in age group 41-60(AOR = 5.05, 95% CI: 2.35–10.83) and 15.74 times higher in age group 61–80 (AOR = 15.74, 95% CI: 5.56–44.55) as compared to age less than 40 years (Table 3).

Table 3. Factors associated with podoconiosis in Machakel district North-West Ethiopia, 2022.

Variables Category case Control COR [95% CI] AOR [95% CI]
Bare foot No 72 184 1 1
Yes 32 24 3.40(1.87–6.17) 5.83(2.34–14.50)*
Sex Female 70 93 2.54(1.55–4.16) 4.25(2.22–8.14)*
Male 34 115 1 1
Marital status Single 3 6 1 1
Married 80 195 0.82(0.2–3.36) 0.19(0.03–1.11)
Divorced 11 3 7.33(1.11–48.26) 0.83(0.09–7.5)
Widowed 10 4 5.00(0.82–30.46) 0.34(0.04–2.94
Age group 21–40 14 93 1 1
41–60 63 101 4.14(2.17–7.89) 5.05(2.35–10.83)*
61–80 27 14 12.81(5.44–30.14) 15.74(5.56–44.55)*
Family history No 46 88 1 1
Yes 58 120 1.09(1.21–3.11) 3.01(1.41–6.42)*
Occupation Farmer 81 148 0.36(0.06–2.22) 0.62(0.07–5.35)
House wife 16 47 0.22(0.03–1.48) 0.27(0.02–2.74)
Merchant 7 13 1 1
Owned a pair of shoe No 4 3 2.73(0.6–12.44) 2.5(0.38–16.53)
Yes 100 205 1 1

1 = Reference

* = significant at p-value <0.05 in multivariable logistic regression

Discussion

Even though podoconiosis has been known for more than a millennium, it has been a neglected and under-researched. Podoconiosis has recently been designated neglected tropical disease status by the WHO [25].

Barefooted people were at higher risk of developing podoconiosis as compared to those who wear shoes. This finding agreed with the study conducted in southern Ethiopia [26]. This implies barefooted individuals are more likely to be exposed to irritant minerals found in earth that lead to Podoconiosis [27,28].

Being female was another variable with higher odds among cases compared to males. This finding was in line with a study done in the West and East Gojjam zones [15]. This might be due to exposure intensity variation. Traditionally, males usually wear shoes more frequently than females in this community.

Family history of podoconiosis was also at higher odds among cases than controls. This might be due to the effect of family genes in the development of Podoconiosis [29]. This study was in line with a study done in West and East Gojjam zones of Ethiopia [16].

Older people, particularly those aged 41–60 years and 61–80 years were at higher risks of developing podoconiosis as compared to those with an age group less than 40 years. This implies older individuals might have long-term exposure to irritant minerals on the earth that could increase the risk of developing podoconiosis.

Limitation of the study

The limitation of this study was the possibility of recall bias that might have been introduced due to retrospective nature of the study design.

Conclusion

Podoconiosis is a common but neglected tropical disease, leading to dramatic non-filarial elephantiasis in the tropics region. This study showed that the determinants of Podoconiosis are regular walking barefooted, family history of podoconiosis, female sex and older age. People should be encouraged to wear shoe all the time. Particularly, females in the study area and other similar settings should be given attention in the existing primary health care packages to promote shoes wearing.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Machakel District Health Office workers for giving us baseline data and supportive letter for data collection. Also, we would thank the data collectors and the study participants.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Tekola F, Mariam DH, Davey G. Economic costs of endemic non-filarial elephantiasis in Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. Trop Med Int Health. 2006. Jul;11(7):1136–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yakob B, Deribe K, Davey G. Health professionals’ attitudes and misconceptions regarding podoconiosis: potential impact on integration of care in southern Ethiopia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010. Jan;104(1):42–7. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tekola F, Ayele Z, Mariam DH, Fuller C, Davey G. Development and testing of a de novo clinical staging system for podoconiosis (endemic non-filarial elephantiasis). Trop Med Int Health. 2008. Oct;13(10):1277–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02133.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Geshere Oli G, Tekola Ayele F, Petros B. Parasitological, serological and clinical evidence for high prevalence of podoconiosis (non-filarial elephantiasis) in Midakegn district, central Ethiopia. Trop Med Int Health. 2012. Jun;17(6):722–6.; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02978.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nenoff P, Simon JC, Muylowa GK, Davey G. Podoconiosis—non-filarial geochemical elephantiasis—a neglected tropical disease? J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010. Jan;8(1):7–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2009.07099_supp.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ayode D, McBride CM, de Heer HD, Watanabe E, Gebreyesus T, Tora A, Tadele G, Davey G. A qualitative study exploring barriers related to use of footwear in rural highland ethiopia: implications for neglected tropical disease control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013. Apr 25;7(4):e2199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wanji S, Tendongfor N, Esum M, Che JN, Mand S, et al. (2008) Elephantiasis of non-filarial origin (podoconiosis) in the highlands of north-western Cameroon. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 102: 529–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rowley MJ, Rapini RP. Elephantiasis nostras. Cutis. 1992. Feb;49(2):91–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Deribe K, Tomczyk S, Tekola-Ayele F. Ten years of podoconiosis research in Ethiopia. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2013. Oct 10;7(10):e2301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Price EW. The association of endemic elephantiasis of the lower legs in East Africa with soil derived from volcanic rocks. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1976;70(4):288–95. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(76)90078-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.WHO: Diseases covered by NTD Department; 2011. [Book Diseases covered by Department] pp City: WHO; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Price E. Podoconiosis Non-filarial Elephantiasis,. Oxford Medical Publications. 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.COHEN LB. Idiopathic lymphoedema of Ethiopia and Kenya. East Afr Med J. 1960. Feb;37:53–74. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Korevaar DA, Visser BJ. Podoconiosis, a neglected tropical disease. Neth J Med. 2012. Jun 1;70(5):210–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Feleke BE. Determinants of podoconiosis, a case control study. Ethiopian journal of health sciences. 2017. Aug 22;27(5):501–6. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v27i5.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Molla YB, Tomczyk S, Amberbir T, Tamiru A, Davey G. Patients’ perceptions of podoconiosis causes, prevention and consequences in East and West Gojam, Northern Ethiopia. BMC public health. 2012. Dec;12:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Price EW. Endemic elephantiasis of the lower legs in Rwanda and Burundi. Trop Geogr Med. 1976. Dec;28(4):283–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ruiz L, Campo E, Corachán M. Elephantiasis in São Tomé and Príncipe. Acta Trop. 1994. Jun;57(1):29–34. doi: 10.1016/0001-706x(94)90090-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Argachew Y. Association between Foot type and Podoconiosis,. 2018. http://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/24590. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mousley E, Deribe K, Tamiru A, Davey G. The impact of podoconiosis on quality of life in Northern Ethiopia. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013. Jul 17;11:122. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sime H, Deribe K, Assefa A, et al. Integrated mapping of lymphatic filariasis and podoconiosis: lessons learnt from Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2014. Aug 27;7:397. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Frommel D, Ayranci B, Pfeifer HR, Sanchez A, Frommel A, Mengistu G. Podoconiosis in the Ethiopian Rift Valley. Role of beryllium and zirconium. Trop Geogr Med. 1993;45(4):165–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dejene F, Merga H, Asefa H. Community based cross sectional study of podoconiosis and associated factors in Dano district, Central Ethiopia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019. Jan 28;13(1):e0007050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Getie A, Atamenta T, Nigatu R, Abera A, Girma M. Magnitude of Podoconiosis and Its Associated Factors among an Adult Population in Waghmra Zone, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomed Res Int. 2020. Aug 6;2020:9107562. doi: 10.1155/2020/9107562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.WHO. Podoconiosis, a neglected tropical disease. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meskele AE, Kassa EY. Podoconiosis Prevalence and Its Associated Factors in Soddo Zuria District,Ethiopia. Journal of Pharmacy and Alternative Medicine. 2016,Vol.13, [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Minstory of Health(MoH). Lymphatic filariasis and podoconiosis morbidity management and disability prevention guidelines. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Muli J, Gachohi J, Kagai J. Soil iron and aluminium concentrations and feet hygiene as possible predictors of Podoconiosis occurrence in Kenya. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017. Aug 23;11(8):e0005864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nenoff P, Simon JC, Muylowa GK, Davey G. Podoconiosis—non-filarial geochemical elephantiasis—a neglected tropical disease? J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2010. Jan;8(1):7–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2009.07099_supp.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011686.r001

Decision Letter 0

Victor S Santos

13 Jun 2023

Dear Mr. Wassie,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Determinantes of Podoconiosis among Residents in Machakle District East Gojjam Zone Amhara Region Ethiopia" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Victor S. Santos, Ph.D

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Justin Remais

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: • The authors stated the objective of the study. However, the writers have not spelt out the justification of the study. I suggest the writers give a solid and convincing reasons for this study of which findings has already been established in literature.

• Authors have obtained permission from the appropriate ethic regulatory bodies for the study. Please let the ‘ethics approval and consent to participate’ statement appear at the methods section of the manuscript and not to the end. Also, kindly provide the ethical clearance reference number of the study in the ethic declaration statement.

• The authors clearly described the appropriate population suitable for the study. However, the description of cases and control, inclusion and exclusion criteria are not clear and should be stated with clarity.

• The variable; ‘Family history’. Line 153 is not clear. Please kindly clarify this.

• The sample size was determined from sample size calculation and is sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested.

Reviewer #2: The methodology described in the manuscript is appropriate for the clearly stated objective. Ethical requirements were fulfilled for for the study.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: • The results are not completely presented. I kindly suggest the following:

- Table headings should be bolded

- Table 1 and 2 are overlapping. I suggest that if a table cannot fit into one page, the authors should break that into sections. Example; Table 1, Table 1 (continued) maintaining the title of the columns under each table sections.

- Table 1: The categories under ‘education is not clear’. I suggest the writers put the categories as: Cannot read and write, Can read and write. Primary, Higher.

- Please in which currency is the characteristic ‘Income’ categorized? I suggest the authors provide this information in parenthesis beside ‘Income’. Example: Income (USD)

- Table 2: Please the statement in Line 213-214 cannot be found in the referenced table (Table 2)

- Please what is the difference between the result mentioned in Line 210-211 and Line 214-216? Please clarify.

- The characteristic ‘Washing feet per week’, is it without soap? If so, please correct it.

- I think the characteristic ‘Years with shoe wearing should be ‘Number of years of shoe wearing’

- Please the categories under the characteristic ‘Year with shoe wearing’ is not clear. The arrangement of categories is not chronological. What is the difference between ' More than half year and Less than a year? Please correct this statement and let the categories be chronologically presented.

- The characteristic ‘Days with shoe from the week’ not clear. I suggest it should be presented as ‘Number of days of shoe wearing per week’

- Line 235-236: The statistic; 2.05 mentioned in the statement ‘The odds of having podoconiosis was 2.05 times higher….’is not found in the referenced Table 3. Please correct this.

- Table 3: Please provide a column containing information on the P- values

Reviewer #2: The results are clearly presented.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: • The authors provided conclusions which are supported by the data presented in the manuscript.

• The limitation of the study is mentioned.

• The benefit of the findings to the advancement of knowledge on the topic under study have been discussed and public health relevance has also been touched on.

Reviewer #2: The conclusions are supported by the data presented and study limitation was also noted.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: I suggest the authors take into consideration the recommendations made in the results section to make them look more presentable.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: • At present, the manuscript needs some further work:

1. The manuscript is poorly written with typographical and grammatical errors making it difficult to read and understand. I therefore highly recommend language editing

2. I presume the word ‘Determinantes’ in the title is supposed to be an English word ‘Determinants’. Please correct.

3. The font type and size of the main write up is different from the one used for the reference lists. I suggest authors edit the manuscript to have a uniform font type and size.

4. The ‘Author’s summary’ as required by the journal is missing in the manuscript. I suggest the authors provide this important information after the ‘Abstract’ statement

5. The in-text citation is incorrect. The journal requires a square bracket not parenthesis

6. Most of the bibliographies are incorrect. For example, some are incomplete, some in capital letters etc. I recommend that the authors edit the bibliographies to suite the journal’s style.

Reviewer #2: The study provides important information on determinant of a neglected NTD and adds to the limited body of knowledge on this disease.

However, this reviewer will recommend that authors should consider employing the service of an English language editor. The grammar usage in the manuscript is currently not at an acceptable level for publication.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Attachment

Submitted filename: PNTD-D-23-00471_reviewer.pdf

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011686.r003

Decision Letter 1

Victor S Santos

8 Aug 2023

Dear Mr. Wassie,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Determinants of Podoconiosis among Residents of Machakle District East Gojjam Zone Amhara Region Ethiopia" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Victor S. Santos, Ph.D

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Justin Remais

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011686.r005

Decision Letter 2

Victor S Santos

27 Sep 2023

Dear Mr. Wassie,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Determinants of Podoconiosis among Residents of Machakle District East Gojjam Zone Amhara Region Ethiopia' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Victor S. Santos, Ph.D

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Justin Remais

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011686.r006

Acceptance letter

Victor S Santos

1 Oct 2023

Dear Mr. Wassie,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Determinants of Podoconiosis among Residents of Machakle District East Gojjam Zone Amhara Region Ethiopia," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PNTD-D-23-00471_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Point by point response letter to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Point by point response letter to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES