Abstract
Coxiella burnetii is the aetiological agent of Q fever, which is highly prevalent in Turkiye, but information on the genetic profiles of the bacterium is limited. This study aimed to investigate the presence of C. burnetii in bovine bulk tank milk (BTM) samples by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and to investigate the genotypes by means of multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA). A total of 25 markets that sold raw cow’s milk were analysed by conventional PCR analysis. An MLVA analysis was performed at six loci, namely MS23, MS24, MS27, MS28, MS33, and MS34, to determine the genotypic variations of C. burnetii found in the positive DNA samples. The DNA of C. burnetii was detected in 16% of the BTM samples. The C. burnetii strains identified in the bovine milk samples collected in this study were found to belong to the same genotypic group as those detected in the bovine milk samples gathered in Greece. As a result, both the presence and genotyping studies of C. burnetii on the BTM samples in Turkiye will contribute to the determination of the geographical distribution of the agent.
Keywords: genotyping, Q fever, raw milk, Turkiye
Q fever is a global zoonotic disease caused by Coxiella burnetii, an obligate Gram-negative bacterium, which can infect various animal species and humans (Eldin et al. 2017). Ruminants are usually asymptomatic carriers of C. burnetii and are considered a source of infection for humans (Ceglie et al. 2015). C. burnetii is transmitted to humans mainly by inhalation of bacteria-contaminated aerosols and following direct contact with infected animals or their products (Pexara et al. 2018a).
The most common method to detect C. burnetii in milk is a real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis (Jodelko et al. 2021). The method can be utilised for either an animal’s individual milk samples or bulk tank milk (BTM) (Rabaza et al. 2021). Analysis of BTM samples is practical and relatively inexpensive to investigate for C. burnetii at the farm level and estimate their regional prevalence (Pexara et al. 2018b). Moreover, due to the discontinuous shedding pattern of C. burnetii (Guatteo et al. 2007), BTM is more preferred than an individual milk analysis.
The incidence of C. burnetii has increased rapidly in many regions in Turkiye (Bagatir et al. 2021). Erzurum is an eastern city of Turkiye where livestock exchange occurs frequently and animal husbandry is intensive. Although molecular prevalence rates of C. burnetii in sheep and cattle have been reported from many regions in Turkiye (Can et al. 2015; Gulmez Saglam and Sahin 2016), to the best of our knowledge, there is limited data on the molecular prevalence of C. burnetii in the BTM in Turkiye (Can et al. 2015).
Genotyping is useful for analysing the available circulation of C. burnetii strains and finding the potential relationship between the genotypes and the virulence of the strains (Arricau-Bouvery et al. 2006). Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) is useful for identifying and genotyping C. burnetii isolates (Pinero et al. 2015). By using the MLVA method, the genotypic relatedness can be revealed from the same DNA sample of molecularly identified strains. Thus, the necessity of isolating the bacteria in a culture is eliminated (Cumbassa et al. 2015). Various studies from different countries have identified the C. burnetii MLVA genotypes that infect dairy cattle herds (Mioni et al. 2019; Bauer et al. 2021; Hemsley et al. 2023). A recent study in the Northeast Anatolia Region of Turkiye showed that cattle genotypes play an active role in the transmission of C. burnetii to humans (Ozgen et al. 2022). The objectives of this study were: 1) to demonstrate the presence of C. burnetii in the BTM in Erzurum province, where cattle breeding is high, 2) to investigate the C. burnetii MLVA genotypes found in the DNA-positive PCR samples. We hypothesise that the MLVA profiles of the C. burnetii isolates from different geographic regions will exhibit genetic diversity, indicating the presence of multiple strains of the bacterium. This information could provide valuable insights into the epidemiology and transmission dynamics of C. burnetii in dairy cattle populations, and potentially contribute to the development of control measures to reduce the risk of human infection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sample collection
BTM samples were randomly collected from 25 markets located in the central region of Erzurum, in the Northeast of Turkiye, which sell local food products, and the convenience sampling method was used for this study. Samples were collected in 50 ml sterile plastic tubes and then immediately transferred to the laboratory and stored at +4 °C until required for further analysis. The BTM samples were collected between March and April 2022. The Erzurum Veterinary Control Institute Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee approved the study with a protocol No. 2022/89.
Processing of the milk and DNA extraction
The cream was separated from the milk samples prior to the DNA extraction. In order to separate the cream, the milk was transferred into 1 ml sterile microcentrifuge tubes and then centrifuged at 13 600 × g for 60 minutes. After the cream layer had been separated, the remaining pellet was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After washing, the pellet was diluted with 200 μl of PBS (Berri et al. 2000). To extract the DNA, we used a QIAamp cador Pathogen Nucleic Acid Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France). After extraction, 50 μl of eluate was collected for each sample. The quality of the DNA was evaluated by measuring the optical density (OD) 260/280 ratio (≅ 1.8) and the OD 260/230 ratio (≅ 2.02) using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). Samples with acceptable ratios were deemed suitable for further analysis. The DNA samples were stored at –20 °C until the PCR and MLVA analyses. The C. burnetii Nine Mile phase strain was used as the positive control in the DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and MLVA analysis.
For the PCR amplification, a Labcycler Gradient (SensoQuest, Göttingen, Germany) thermal cycler was used. A total volume of 25 μl was prepared, containing 12.5 μl of the Hotstart Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 1 μl of each primer, 3 μl of the extracted DNA samples, and 7.5 μl of deionised distilled water. A touchdown PCR program was employed, consisting of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 6 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 66 °C with a decrease of 1 °C per cycle for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1 minute. Subsequently, 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 61 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min were performed. A final extension was performed at 72 °C for 5 minutes.
Identification of Coxiella burnetii
In terms of the identification of C. burnetii, a conventional PCR analysis was performed using the IS1111 gene region-specific Trans1 and Trans2 primers (Berri et al. 2000). The obtained amplicons were identified in 1.5% agarose gel by electrophoresis. The gel was prepared by mixing 1.5% agarose with 6x loading dye, and 10 μl of the PCR product was loaded into each well. One well was loaded with a 100–3 000 bp DNA ladder, one well with a positive control PCR amplicon, and one well with a negative control PCR amplicon. The electrophoresis was performed at 60 volts and 400 milliamperes for 90 minutes. The PCR products were then visualised using an electrophoresis power station. Agarose gel was placed in the transilluminator and imaging was performed under UV light through the GeneLine ImageSource Software program (Spectronics Corporation, USA). C. burnetii was considered positive if amplicons were detected in the agarose gel with a 687 bp DNA fragment (Figure 1).
Figure 1. The agarose gel image of the C. burnetii positive bulk tank milk samples.
The reference indicator (M = ladder, 100–3 000 bp), NC (negative control), PC (positive control), 1st, 2nd, 7th, and 9th places are the 687 bp bands belonging to the positive samples
MLVA analysis
An MLVA analysis was performed at six loci, namely MS23, MS24, MS27, MS28, MS33, and MS34, to determine the genotypic variations of the C. burnetii found in the positive DNA samples (Klaassen et al. 2009; Tilburg et al. 2012). After the reactions were prepared in 20 μl volumes, 10 μl of the HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France), 6 μl of deionised distilled water, 0.5 μM of primer, and 2 μl of the sample DNA were added to 0.2 ml tubes and then heated in a thermal cycler at 95 °C. After 15 min of initial denaturation, 40 cycles were performed at 95 °C for 30 s, at 60 °C for 45 s, and at 72 °C for 90 seconds. With regard to the final elongation phase, the denaturation was applied at 72 °C for 7 minutes. The optimisation of the test was performed using a C. burnetii Nine Mile Phase I DNA sample. A QIAxcel Advanced System (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) was used to perform the capillary electrophoresis in order to determine the locus sizes. The number of repeats was then calculated for each locus (Racic et al. 2014).
The MLVA profiles of the C. burnetii identified in the positive samples were compared with the MLVA bank database from France, Germany, Slovakia, Japan, Hungary, the Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Portugal, Italy, Poland and Greece (MLVA Bank 2022). A nexus file concerning the closeness between the strains was prepared using the unweighted pair group and mathematical averaging method based on the Hamming/P Distance Similarity Index using the Past v4.09 (Palaeontological Association, Norway) software program for the MLVA profiles obtained from the database.
RESULTS
The DNA of C. burnetii was detected in 16% of the BTM samples obtained from the sellers of the local raw cow’s milk in Erzurum. During the optimisation of the MLVA, we found that the C. burnetii Nine Mile Phase I positive control DNA sample contained 9, 27, 4, 6, 9, and 5 repeats, respectively, at the MS23, MS24, MS27, MS28, MS33, and MS34 loci. The numbers of repeats detected in the MS23, MS24, MS27, MS28, MS33, and MS34 loci as a result of the MLVA analysis of the DNA samples determined to be positive C. burnetii are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. MLVA results from the C. burnetii positive bovine bulk tank milk samples.
Code of positive samples | MS23 | MS24 | MS27 | MS28 | MS33 | MS34 |
CbCM01 | NA | NA | 2 | 3 | NA | NA |
CbCM02 | NA | NA | 3 | 3 | NA | NA |
CbCM03 | NA | NA | 3 | 3 | NA | NA |
CbCM04 | NA | NA | 2 | 3 | NA | NA |
CbCM = Coxiella burnetii cattle milk; NA = not amplified
A circular dendrogram (Figure 2) was generated by comparing the MLVA genotype structures of the C. burnetii DNA detected in the milk samples with those from previous studies (MLVA Bank 2022). We compared a total of 131 bovine C. burnetii MLVA profiles from 16 different countries and identified 20 genotypic groups. The C. burnetii detected in the bovine milk samples collected in this study were found to be localised within the same genotypic group as those detected in the bovine milk samples from Greece. This particular genotypic group was also observed to have the highest number of C. burnetii among all the identified genotypic groups.
Figure 2. A circular dendrogram was created to represent the genotypes of C. burnetii found in the bulk tank milk samples, and to compare them with the genotypes present in the MLVA Bank for the Microbes Genotyping database.
A total of 131 genotypes from 16 different countries, primarily European countries, were compared, resulting in the formation of 20 genotypic groups. The genotypes identified in this study are highlighted in bold characters. Notably, our study revealed that the genotypes detected in our samples were clustered together with those reported from Greece
DISCUSSION
In this study, the DNA of C. burnetii was detected in 16% of the BTM samples collected from the sellers of the local raw cow’s milk in Erzurum. This study is one of the first to analyse the detection of C. burnetii DNA by PCR in BTM samples obtained from cattle in Turkiye. Previous studies conducted in Turkiye have reported PCR positivity levels for C. burnetii in bovine milk samples ranging from 1.42% to 10% (Can et al. 2015; Gulmez Saglam and Sahin 2016). Furthermore, it has been determined that the global molecular prevalence of C. burnetii in BTM samples is 37% (Rabaza et al. 2021), which is considerably higher than the positivity rate identified in this study. The observed disparity in the results might be associated with the climatic conditions of the sampling location, as Erzurum is a city located in the Northeast Anatolia region of Turkiye, which is known for its cold weather and has an altitude of 1 850 meters above sea level. The lower temperatures in the city may have caused a reduction in the shedding of C. burnetii. A previous study reported that the shedding of C. burnetii tends to increase during hot and dry weather conditions, likely due to the airborne transmission of contaminated dust particles (Nusinovici et al. 2015). Examinations of BTM samples have shown a global prevalence of 37% (Rabaza et al. 2021), but the studies also indicated that the prevalence can vary widely, ranging from 10.7% to 76.9% (USDA APHIS 2011; Boroduske et al. 2017). The mechanism of transmission for this agent is associated with contact between animals and the agent load within the herd (Rabaza et al. 2021). The observed variations may be due to differences in the sampling periods and with the used analytical methods (Gulmez Saglam and Sahin 2016).
In the MLVA analysis of C. burnetii detected in this study, a partial genotype was determined despite high DNA loading. Studies conducted on milk tank samples have reported that mixing milk from positive and negative individuals can lead to reduced DNA concentrations, resulting in partial genotyping in the MLVA analysis (Tilburg et al. 2012). Another reason for the lower DNA concentration could be related to the insertions or deletions in the genome, which may prevent the detection of repeats in a locus (Sidi-Boumedine et al. 2015). In addition, it has been reported that there could be amplification failures or unexpected amplifications at the MS23 and MS33 loci (Sidi-Boumedine et al. 2015).
The current research identified partial genotypes with 2-3 and 3-3 repeat numbers at the MS27 and MS28 loci, respectively. By comparing 131 C. burnetii MLVA samples obtained from 16 different countries, which are available in the MLVA Bank 2022, the partial MLVA genotype profiles identified in this study were found to belong to the same group as those reported by Kalaitzakis et al. (2021). However, a complete comparison could not be made due to the partial nature of the genotypes. When examining the genotypes MS27 and MS28 2-3 from the MLVA Bank for the Microbes Genotyping database, they were found to be present in cattle, sheep, goats, and humans from Spain, France, Portugal, Iran, and Morocco. MS27 consists of a total of 9 genotypes between 43 and 51 of the MS28 2-3 genotype profile to the MLVA6Nijmegen genotype number, as reported by Arricau-Bouvery et al. (2006), Astobiza et al. (2012), and Santos et al. (2012). In the MLVA Bank for the Microbes Genotyping database, there are 15 different genotypes with 3-3 repeats at the MS27 and MS28 loci, identified from cattle, sheep, goats, and humans from various countries such as the Netherlands, France, Austria, Spain, Germany, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Iran, and Hungary, as reported by Arricau-Bouvery et al. (2006), Astobiza et al. (2012), Chmielewski et al. (2009), Roest et al. (2013), and Tilburg et al. (2012).
The genotyping of C. burnetii revealed the geog-raphic variability of the bacteria and helped to determine the origins of the epidemic (Szymanska-Czerwinska et al. 2019). Seven distinct genotypes have previously been identified in Spain (Astobiza et al. 2012), while another study conducted in Spain identified 15 different genotypes in samples obtained from milk tanks (Pinero et al. 2015). Moreover, Tilburg et al. (2012) applied the MLVA method and detected nine different genotypes in milk samples sold in the Netherlands. Another previous study found low-level differences in terms of the MLVA genotyping of bovine milk samples from Greece (Kalaitzakis et al. 2021). In Italy, the genotypes detected in both cow’s milk samples and goat’s milk samples were found to be different (Ceglie et al. 2015). In addition, in Poland, three different genotype groups have been reported (Szymanska-Czerwinska et al. 2019).
In conclusion, the detection of C. burnetii, which poses a risk to public health, in BTM reveals the necessity of routine implementation of reliable food systems in dairy enterprises. Moreover, the 16% positivity rate of C. burnetii in the BTM samples indicates a widespread agent in bovine dairy farms. In this study, two different genotypes were determined according to the number of studied samples, which indicates that geographically different genotypes may circulate. Conducting both prevalence and genotyping studies on BTM samples in Turkiye will contribute to determining the geographical distribution of the disease.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- Arricau-Bouvery N, Hauck Y, Bejaoui A, Frangoulidis D, Bodier CC, Souriau A, Meyer H, Neubauer H, Rodolakis A, Vergnaud G. Molecular characterization of Coxiella burnetii isolates by infrequent restriction site-PCR and MLVA typing. BMC Microbiol. 2006 Apr 26;6:1-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Astobiza I, Tilburg JJ, Pinero A, Hurtado A, Garcia-Perez AL, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Klaassen CH. Genotyping of Coxiella burnetii from domestic ruminants in northern Spain. BMC Vet Res. 2012 Dec 10;8:241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bagatir PS, Okumus B, Ozgen EK, Ulucan M, Yanmaz B, Aktas O. Seroprevalence of Q fever in small ruminants in the northeast Anatolian region in Turkey. Med Weter. 2021 Jan;77(7):337-40. [Google Scholar]
- Bauer BU, Knittler MR, Herms TL, Frangoulidis D, Matthiesen S, Tappe D, Ganter M. Multispecies Q fever outbreak in a mixed dairy goat and cattle farm based on a new bovine-associated genotype of Coxiella burnetii. Vet Sci. 2021 Oct;8(11):252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berri M, Laroucau K, Rodolakis A. The detection of Coxiella burnetii from ovine genital swabs, milk and fecal samples by the use of a single touchdown polymerase chain reaction. Vet Microbiol. 2000 Mar 15;72(3-4):285-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boroduske A, Trofimova J, Kibilds J, Papule U, Sergejeva M, Rodze I, Grantina-Ievina L. Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) infection in dairy cattle and associated risk factors in Latvia. Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Jul;145(10):2011-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Can HY, Elmali M, Karagoz A. Detection of Coxiella burnetii in cows’, goats’, and ewes’ bulk milk samples using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Mljekarstvo. 2015 Jan;65(1):26-31. [Google Scholar]
- Ceglie L, Guerrini E, Rampazzo E, Barberio A, Tilburg JJ, Hagen F, Lucchese L, Zuliani F, Marangon S, Natale A. Molecular characterization by MLVA of Coxiella burnetii strains infecting dairy cows and goats of north-eastern Italy. Microbes Infect. 2015 Nov-Dec;17(11-12):776-81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chmielewski T, Sidi-Boumedine K, Duquesne V, Podsiadly E, Thiery R, Tylewska-Wierzbanowska S. Molecular epidemiology of Q fever in Poland. Pol J Microbiol. 2009;58(1):9-13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cumbassa A, Barahona MJ, Cunha MV, Azorin B, Fonseca C, Rosalino LM, Tilburg J, Hagen F, Santos AS, Botelho A. Coxiella burnetii DNA detected in domestic ruminants and wildlife from Portugal. Vet Microbiol. 2015 Oct 22;180(1-2):136-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eldin C, Melenotte C, Mediannikov O, Ghigo E, Million M, Edouard S, Mege JL, Maurin M, Raoult D. From Q fever to Coxiella burnetii infection: A paradigm change. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017 Jan;30(1):115-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guatteo R, Beaudeau F, Joly A, Seegers H. Coxiella burnetii shedding by dairy cows. Vet Res. 2007 Nov-Dec;38(6):849-60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gulmez Saglam A, Sahin M. Coxiella burnetii in samples from cattle herds and sheep flocks in the Kars region of Turkey. Vet Med-Czech. 2016 Jan;61(1):17-22. [Google Scholar]
- Hemsley CM, Essex-Lopresti A, Chisnall T, Millar M, Neale S, Reichel R, Norville IH, Titball RW. MLVA and com1 genotyping of Coxiella burnetii in farmed ruminants in Great Britain. Vet Microbiol. 2023 Feb;277:109629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jodelko A, Szymanska-Czerwinska M, Rola JG, Niemczuk K. Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in small ruminants and genotyping of specimens collected from goats in Poland. BMC Vet Res. 2021 Oct 28;17(1):341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalaitzakis E, Fancello T, Simons X, Chaligiannis I, Tomaiuolo S, Andreopoulou M, Petrone D, Papapostolou A, Giadinis ND, Panousis N, Mori M. Pathogens. 2021 Mar 3;10(3):287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klaassen CH, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Tilburg JJ, Hamans MA, Horrevorts AM. Multigenotype Q fever outbreak, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Apr;15(4):613-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mioni MSR, Sidi-Boumedine K, Morales Dalanezi F, Fernandes Joaquim S, Denadai R, Reis Teixeira WS, Bahia Labruna M, Megid J. New genotypes of Coxiella burnetii circulating in Brazil and Argentina. Pathogens. 2019 Dec 28;9(1):30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MLVA Bank. Coxiella burnetii public databases [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2022 Apr 1]. Available from: https://microbesgenotyping.i2bc.paris-saclay.fr/databases/view/65.
- Nusinovici S, Frossling J, Widgren S, Beaudeau F, Lindberg A. Q fever infection in dairy cattle herds: Increased risk with high wind speed and low precipitation. Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Nov;143(15):3316-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozgen EK, Kilicoglu Y, Yanmaz B, Ozmen M, Ulucan M, Serifoglu Bagatir P, Karadeniz Putur E, Ormanci S, Okumus B, Iba Yilmaz S, Karasahin O, Aslan MH, Ozturk M, Birinci A, Bilgin K, Tanriverdi Cayci Y, Tanyel E. Molecular epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii detected in humans and domestic ruminants in Turkey. Vet Microbiol. 2022 Oct;273:109519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pexara A, Solomakos N, Govaris A. Q fever and prevalence of Coxiella burnetii in milk. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;71:65-72. [Google Scholar]
- Pexara A, Solomakos N, Govaris A. Q fever and seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii in domestic ruminants. Vet Ital. 2018 Dec 31;54(4):265-79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pinero A, Barandika JF, Garcia-Perez AL, Hurtado A. Genetic diversity and variation over time of Coxiella burnetii genotypes in dairy cattle and the farm environment. Infect Genet Evol. 2015 Apr;31:231-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rabaza A, Fraga M, Corbellini LG, Turner KME, Riet-Correa F, Eisler MC. Molecular prevalence of Coxiella burnetii in bulk-tank milk from bovine dairy herds: Systematic review and meta-analysis. One Health. 2021 Jun;12:100208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Racic I, Spicic S, Galov A, Duvnjak S, Zdelar-Tuk M, Vujnovic A, Habrun B, Cvetnic Z. Identification of Coxiella burnetii genotypes in Croatia using multi-locus VNTR analysis. Vet Microbiol. 2014 Oct 10;173(3-4):340-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roest HI, van Solt CB, Tilburg JJ, Klaassen CH, Hovius EK, Roest FT, Vellema P, van den Brom R, van Zijderveld FG. Search for possible additional reservoirs for human Q fever, The Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 May;19(5):834-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos AS, Tilburg JJ, Botelho A, Barahona MJ, Nuncio MS, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Klaassen CH. Genotypic diversity of clinical Coxiella burnetii isolates from Portugal based on MST and MLVA typing. Int J Med Microbiol. 2012 Nov;302(6):253-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidi-Boumedine K, Duquesne V, Prigent M, Yang E, Joulie A, Thiery R, Rousset E. Impact of IS1111 insertion on the MLVA genotyping of Coxiella burnetii. Microbes Infect. 2015 Nov-Dec;17(11-12):789-94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szymanska-Czerwinska M, Jodelko A, Zareba-March-ewka K, Niemczuk K. Shedding and genetic diversity of Coxiella burnetii in Polish dairy cattle. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tilburg JJ, Roest HJ, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Horrevorts AM, Klaassen CH. Genotyping reveals the presence of a predominant genotype of Coxiella burnetii in consumer milk products. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Jun;50(6):2156-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- USDA APHIS – National Animal Health Monitoring System. Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii in bulk-tank milk on U.S. dairy operations [Internet]. 2011. [cited 2022 Oct 5]. Available from: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/dairy/downloads/dairy07/Dairy07_is_Coxiella.pdf.