Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Apr 15;86(5):579–586. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002603

Effect of changes in body mass index on the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes mellitus in HIV-positive individuals: results from the D:A:D study

Kathy Petoumenos 1, Locadiah Kuwanda 1, Lene Ryom 2, Amanda Mocroft 3, Peter Reiss 4, Stephane De Wit 5, Christian Pradier 6, Fabrice Bonnet 7, Andrew Phillips 3, Camilla I Hatleberg 2, Antonella d’Arminio Monforte 8, Rainer Weber 9, Caroline A Sabin 3, Jens Lundgren 2, Matthew G Law 1; D:A:D Study group
PMCID: PMC10581947  NIHMSID: NIHMS1928326  PMID: 33351531

Abstract

Background

Weight gain is common among people with HIV once antiretroviral treatment (ART) is commenced. We assess the effect of changes in body mass index (BMI), from different baseline BMI levels, on the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods

D:A:D participants receiving ART were followed from their first BMI measurement to the first of either CVD or DM event, or earliest of 1/2/2016 or 6 months after last follow-up. Participants were stratified according to their baseline BMI, and changes from baseline BMI were calculated for each participant. Poisson regression models were used to assess the effects of changes on BMI on CVD or DM events.

Results

There were 2,104 CVD and 1,583 DM events over 365,287 and 354,898 person years (rate: CVD 5.8/1000 (95% CI 5.5–6.0); DM 4.5/1000 (95% CI 4.2 – 4.7)). Participants were largely male (74%), baseline mean age of 40 years and median BMI of 23.0 (IQR: 21.0–25.3). Risk of CVD by change in BMI from baseline, stratified by baseline BMI strata showed little evidence of an increased risk of CVD with an increased BMI in any baseline BMI strata. An increase in BMI was associated with an increased risk of DM across all baseline BMI strata.

Conclusions

While increases in BMI across all levels of baseline BMI were not associated with an increased risk of CVD, such changes were consistently associated with increased risk of DM. There was also some evidence of an increased risk of CVD with a decrease in BMI.

Keywords: HIV, Antiretroviral treatment, BMI, cohort

Introduction

Weight gain is common among people with HIV once antiretroviral treatment (ART) is commenced and has become increasing prevalent among people with HIV receiving more contemporary ART agents. There is growing evidence that some of the excess weight gain recently observed may be attributed to the use of integrase inhibitors (INSTIs), namely dolutegravir (DTG) and bictegravir14 . These effects may be enhanced with the concomitant use of tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), implicating not only the INSTI class but also the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) drug class5. Although the initial weight gained following ART commencement may be attributed to the ‘return to health’ phenomena, excess weight gain can lead to elevated risk of many different comorbidities6,7 and multimorbidity8. This may be compounded by poorer lifestyle behaviours including poor diet and insufficient exercise especially within the context of an increasing obesity epidemic globally.

Increases in body mass index [(BMI) (weight (kg)/height (m2))] have been associated with an increased risk for several serious clinical outcomes including diabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population9,10 and among people with HIV1113. At the same time, being underweight or having a low BMI have also be associated with increased mortality in the general population14, and low BMI has been associated with CVD, cancer and mortality among people with HIV13.

Previously shown in the D:A:D cohort, a gain in BMI in the first year post ART initiation was associated with an increased risk of CVD, but only in those with pre-ART BMI in the normal range (18.5–25 kg/m2). In contrast, among people with HIV with BMIs in the lower and higher categories, a gain in BMI over the first year post ART did not appear to increase the risk of CVD. In a follow-up study from the D:A:D , a non-linear association with latest (time updated) BMI and CVD, cancer and all-cause mortality was reported, with both low (<18.5/<20 kg/m2) and very-high (>30 kg/m2) BMI being associated with increased risk of these events13. In both studies, however, the relationship with BMI and DM was linear, with risk of incident DM increasing linearly with increases in BMI, whether assessed as short-term change in BMI or time updated (recent) BMI13,15. A study by the Veterans Aging cohort study (VACS), have also report a linear association with increasing weight gain and incident DM16.

In this study we aim to assess the effect of changes in BMI, from different baseline BMI levels, on the incidence of centrally validated CVD and DM events in the D:A:D Study. We hypothesise that decreases in BMI at low baseline BMI and increases in BMI at high baseline BMI are associated with an increased risk of CVD. In contrast, the risk of DM will increase linearly with short term increases in BMI across all baseline BMI strata.

Methods:

The D:A:D study is a prospective, multi-cohort observational collaborative study, including 11 previously established cohorts following more than 40,000 people with HIV from Europe, Argentina, Australia and the US. The primary aim of the study is to investigate the possible association between ART and the risk of CVD as well as other clinical events. The study methodology has been described in detail previously17. Briefly, people with HIV were under active follow-up at the individual cohorts at the time of enrolment into the D:A:D study, and were included irrespective of whether or how long they were receiving ART. Data were collected as part of their routine clinical care and include demographic and other prospectively collected data such as age, sex, BMI, CVD, DM, family history of coronary heart disease, cigarette smoking, blood pressure therapy, DM therapy, lipid lowering and antihypertensive therapy and serum lipid levels (total (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) and triglycerides (including fasting status) and lipid lowering therapy; as well as HIV-related core clinical data - ART medication received, CD4, viral load and all clinical AIDS diagnoses.

Definitions:

CVD and DM are protocol defined D:A:D endpoints with all prospective cases verified by the completion and central validation of D:A:D specific case report forms (for details see https://chip.dk/Portals/0/files/Studydocuments/DAD_MOOP_revised2013.pdf). In these analyses, a CVD event was the first event from a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), sudden cardiac death or invasive cardiovascular procedure (coronary artery bypass graft, carotid endarterectomy), or stroke. The first DM event was defined as the first of a documented fasting glucose >7.0 mmol/L on at least two occasions, a single value of national glycohemoglobin standardization program (NGSP) haemoglobin A1c >6.5%, or symptoms of DM with a random glucose >11.1 mmol/L, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test >11.1 mmol/L, or use of antidiabetic drugs.

Statistical methods:

For these analyses we included all D:A:D participants who initiated combination (3+) ART, with at least two BMI measures available and at least one year of further follow-up from baseline (defined as the later of cohort entry, ART initiation, or first BMI measurement). We excluded any participants with pre-existing diagnoses of CVD or DM.

Participants were stratified according to their baseline BMI into the following categories: BMI <20, 20–24.9, 25–29.9, and ≥30 kg/m2. The lower and upper of these categories broadly correspond with increased risk of CVD seen in our previous analyses13. Change in BMI was then calculated from the baseline BMI at each new BMI assessment allowing the inclusion of time-updated BMI in analyses. Participants were then stratified into the following BMI change groups: BMI decrease ≥2 kg/m2, BMI decrease 1–1.99kg/m2, BMI stable ±1kg/m2(range from −0.99 to 0.99 kg/m2 ) BMI increase ≥1–1.99 kg/m2 and BMI increase ≥2kg/m2. These cut-offs were chosen to reflect reasonably substantial weight changes while retaining sufficient events and follow-up in each category for analyses.

Descriptive analyses were conducted to summarize the baseline characteristics of participants included in the analyses. Person years of follow-up (py), number of CVD and DM events and incidence rate ratios were calculated. Median weight change corresponding to median BMI changes were also determined.

We used Poisson regression to assess BMI change as a predictor of CVD and DM. Follow-up time commenced from baseline (as defined above) to the first event or earliest of the following: 1/2/2016, 6 months after last follow-up visit or death. Models were adjusted for key confounders not thought to be on the causal pathway for each respective endpoint, as previously identified in the D:A:D13. The model for CVD was adjusted for the categorized baseline BMI, age, race, mode of transmission, sex, cumulative abacavir use, cumulative protease inhibitor (PI) use, cumulative nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) use, CD4 count, family history of CVD and smoking status. BMI and other time-updated covariates were lagged by one year with last observation carried forward. The model for DM was adjusted for categorized baseline BMI, age, race, mode of transmission, sex, cumulative stavudine use, triglycerides, CD4 count, smoking status and HDL. A missing variable category was created for all variables to ensure all observations were included in models. The BMI change associations with CVD and DM were based on regression coefficients, significance levels (P<0.05) and visually using forest plots. Interactions between BMI and BMI change were examined using the likelihood ratio test. The main purpose for also assessing DM in these analyses was to act as a control, as the linear association with increasing weight or BMI and DM is well described in the literature both in the general population and among people with HIV. Demonstrating a similar linear association in these analyses would confirm the robustness of the overall study findings.

We undertook the following additional analyses. First, for the CVD endpoint, we additionally adjusted for variables thought to be on the causal pathway between BMI changes and CVD as identified in prior analysis of this cohort13. These include fasting and non-fasting lipids (total, HDL and LDL cholesterol), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and incident DM. Second, given the strong evidence for differential weight gain affects among women compared to men, we also stratified our analyses by sex for both the CVD and DM outcomes.

Results:

Baseline characteristics of covariates stratified by baseline BMI category are provided in Table 1. A total of 43,805 (88.1%) participants were included in the analyses for the CVD outcome, of whom 74% were male. Median age was 38.9 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 33.2–45.7)), and the median BMI (IQR) overall was 23.1 (21.1–24.4) kg/m2. Characteristics by baseline BMI strata were broadly similar overall, although the proportion of males in the lowest (<20 kg/m2) and highest (≥30 kg/m2) baseline BMI groups (62% and 55%, respectively) was lower than that in the two middle BMI strata (77 and 78%). The lowest and highest BMI categories also reported lower proportions of participants of white race (47% and 41% compared with 52% and 51%). Similar baseline characteristics were observed among the 5,901 who were excluded from the CVD analyses, apart from smaller proportion with undetectable viral load in the excluded population 28% (data not shown).

Table 1.

Patient characteristics at baseline (for CVD outcome analysis) by BMI kg/m2

Overall BMI <20 BMI 20–25 BMI 25–30 BMI 30+
N 43,805 6,304 24,850 10,191 2,460
Sex - male (%) 73.9 62.0 77.1 78.4 56.4
Age in years (median, IQR) 38.9 (33.2, 45.7) 37.0 (31.4, 43.2) 38.6 (33.1, 45.1) 40 (34.5, 48.1) 40.1 (33.8, 47.4)
Infected with HIV through sex between men (%) 45.2 36.6 49.2 45 27.7
Infected with HIV through drug use (%) 14.5 20.4 14.8 11.2 9.5
Race (%)
white 50.5 46.9 52.4 50.5 41.3
black 9.3 7.8 7.6 11.7 21.5
other 2.8 3.4 2.7 2.7 3.2
unknown 37.3 41.9 37.4 35.1 33.9
Current smoker (%) 39.4 48.4 41.8 31.7 24.3
Family history of CVD (%) 6.8 6.2 6.7 7.2 7
BMI (median, IQR) 23.1 (21.1, 25.4) 18.9 (18.1, 19.5) 22.5 (21.4, 23.7) 26.6 (25.7, 27.8) 32.2 (30.9, 34.6)
CD4 count/mm3 (median, IQR) 400 (254, 574) 351 (185, 538) 400 (260, 577) 412 (279, 590) 429 (280, 602)
Log10 HIV RNA (copies/mL) (median, IQR) 2.9 (1.7, 4.5) 3.1 (1.7, 4.7) 2.8 (1.7, 4.5) 2.7 (1.7, 4.4) 3.3 (1.7, 4.4)
Undetectable (%) (RNA<200) 39.9 37.0 40.4 41.9 34.8
ART naïve (%) 38.4 37.1 37.5 38.9 49.6
Hep C coinfection (%) 19.1 25.7 19.8 15.0 11.9
Hep B coinfection (%) 19.8 20.8 20.2 18.6 16.5
Total cholesterol mmol/L (median, IQR) 4.8 (4.0, 5.7) 4.5 (3.8, 5.4) 4.7 (4.0, 5.6) 4.9 (4.1, 5.9) 4.9 (4.1, 5.9)
HDL mmol/L (median, IQR) 1.1 (0.9, 1.4) 1.2 (0.9, 1.5) 1.1 (0.9, 1.4) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3) 1.1 (0.9, 1.3)
Systolic BP (median, IQR) 120 (110, 130) 117 (110, 123) 120 (110, 130) 126 (120, 137) 130 (120, 140)

Note: BP= blood pressure, CVD= cardiovascular disease, HDL= high-density lipoprotein.

At baseline (defined as the later of cohort entry, ART initiation, or first BMI measurement), smoking status was unknown in 16%; Hepatitis B and C status was unknown in 12% and 16% respectively; total cholesterol was missing in 15%, HDL cholesterol was missing in 444%, SBP was missing in 30%

For the DM outcome, 42,521 (85.6%) of the cohort were included in these analyses. Baseline characteristics were similar to the population assessed for the CVD outcome, with 74% were male, median age was 38.7 (IQR: 33 – 45.3), 50% were white, and the median BMI was 23.0 (IQR: 21.0–25.4) (Supplementary Table S1).

The median weight change (kg) by baseline BMI grouped by BMI change (kg/m2) category is illustrated in Figure S1. The greatest absolute change in weight was observed in the BMI change categories with the greatest loss of 2 kg/m2 or more (BMI change: decrease ≥2), and greatest gain of 2 kg/m2 or more (BMI change increase ≥2). For the group with loss in BMI ≥2 kg/m2 or more, the median weight change was notably different between the baseline BMI categories <20 kg/m2 and BMI 30+ kg/m2 (−7.0 kg (IQR −9. to −6.5) and −11.0 kg (IQR −16.3 to −8.0), respectively). Within the remaining BMI change categories, even for BMI change ≥2 kg/m2 or more, the median weight changes were similar across baseline BMI categories.

CVD and DM outcomes:

There were 2,104 CVD events, with a total follow up time of 365,287 person years (py), an overall rate of 5.8/1000 py (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.5–6). Figure 1a shows the incident rate ratios (IRR) for BMI change groups stratified by baseline BMI category. Elevated risk of CVD was observed for the baseline BMI categories of <20 kg/m2 and 25–29.9 kg/m2. After adjustment for covariates a loss in BMI of ≥ 2 kg/m2, resulted in an almost 2-fold increased risk of CVDS (IRR 1.99, 95% CI 1.29–3.06) compared to a stable BMI for baseline BMI <20 kg/m2. For baseline BMI 20–24.9 kg/m2, a loss of ≥ 2 kg/m2 was marginally associated with increased risk compared to stable BMI, while and a loss between 1 and 1.9 kg/m2 had a significant association with increased risk of CVD (1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.49), compared to stable BMI. Conversely, within the baseline BMI ≥30+ kg/m2 category, a lower risk of CVD was observed for those with a gain between 1–1.9 kg/m2 (0.37, 95% CI 0.15–0.93) compared with stable BMI. For all baseline BMI categories however, there was no consistent evidence of increasing risk of CVD as changes in BMI increased.

Figure 1a and 1b. Effect of changes in BMI (kg/m2) on the risk of CVD and DM stratified by baseline BMI (kg/m2) category.

Figure 1a and 1b.

CVD adjusted for key covariates: age, race, mode of HIV transmission, sex, abacavir use, protease inhibitor use, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) use, CD4 count, family history of CVD, smoking status

DM adjusted for key covariates: age, race, mode of HIV transmission, sex, stavudine use, triglycerides, CD4 count, smoking status and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)

Note: BL=baseline; BMI= body mass index; CVD= cardiovascular disease; DM= diabetes mellitus

Additional analyses for CVD adjusting for variables on the causal pathway yielded similarly associations (Table S2). We also assessed for potential interactions between BMI and BMI change, which were not found to be statistically significant (p-value 0.17).

There were 1,583 DM cases with a total follow-up time of 354,898 py, an event rate of 4.5/1000 py (95%CI: 4.2–4.7). Figure 1b illustrates that across all baseline BMI categories risk of DM increases linearly by increases in BMI change. For all baseline BMI categories, a BMI gain of ≥ 2 kg/m2 was associated with a significantly higher DM risk compared with stable BMI. Within the baseline BMI category 25–29.9 kg/m2, the risk of DM for a BMI gain of 1–1.9 kg/m2 (1.33, 95% CI 1.02–1.74) was also statistically significantly increased compared with a stable BMI. As with the CVD outcome, there was no significant interaction between BMI and BMI change (p=0.81).

For both CVD and DM risk, when analyses were stratified by sex, similar trends were observed by gender (Figure 2a and b, Figure 3a and b).

Figure 2a and b – Effect of changes in BMI (kg/m2) on the risk of CVD by sex: male (a) and female (b).

Figure 2a and b –

Note: BL = baseline, BMI= body mass index

Figure 3a and b – Effect of changes in BMI (kg/m2) on the risk of DM by sex: male (a) and female (b).

Figure 3a and b –

Note: BL = baseline, BMI= body mass index

Discussion

Among participants in the D:A:D cohort we have shown that overall increases in BMI across all levels of baseline BMI were not associated with an increased risk of CVD. There was some evidence of an increased risk of CVD with a decrease in BMI especially at low baseline BMI. As hypothesized, however, increases in BMI across all levels of baseline BMI were consistently associated with an increased risk of DM. These findings were consistent for men and women and persisted after further adjustment for factors on the causal pathway (lipids, blood pressure and prior DM) for CVD.

Previously the D:A:D study has reported a non-linear (J-shaped) association between BMI and CVD13. A non-linear association of BMI and CVD risk has also been reported in the general population18. Our current findings suggests the non-linear association between BMI change in CVD risk at lower BMI levels is driven by short-term and larger decreases in BMI at the lowest baseline BMI category, and to some extent this was also observed for the middle BMI categories 20–24.9 and 25–29.9 kg/m2. The larger decrease in BMI for the low and middle baseline BMI categories and increased risk of CVD may reflect declining health. In the general population low BMI was associated with high risk of death with one study reporting an 80% increased risk of death among those with BMI less than 18.5 compared to BMI of 22.5–25 kg/m2 14. Others have also found increased risk of non-communicable disease among people with HIV with low BMI (20 kg/m2 compared to those with a BMI of 25 kg/m2)19 as well as increased mortality among people with HIV who experience weight loss after ART initiation20. It is unlikely that declining health is the reason for our findings, the weight measures were lagged by 12 months meaning the measures we have used preceded the events by at least 1 year. However, the possibility of some residual confounding remains, despite having controlled for a number of known confounders such as smoking in our analyses. As previously suggested, it is also possible that people with low BMI are perceived to be a low risk and therefore get less aggressive disease prevention interventions compared with those with higher BMI13

For baseline BMI levels 30 kg/m2 or more, there was little to no evidence of increased CVD risk with increases in changes of BMI. In the D:A:D study previously we have shown that at higher BMI the risk of CVD increases, although the risk was attenuated after adjustment for lipids, blood pressure, and incident DM13. It is possible that these changes would only be differentiating among individuals with very high BMI over 35 kg/m2; in our analyses, the number of participants in this category is very small and the power of analyses would be limited. In the study by Koethe et al, individuals commencing ART with a BMI 30 kg/m2 experienced a lower risk of CVD and other morbidities, compared to those with a BMI 25 kg/m2, although this protective effect was attenuated at BMI 35 kg/m2 19.

We explored DM as a secondary outcome in these analyses mostly to act as a control analysis. We show a significantly increase in risk of DM with BMI changes of >2kg/m2, equivalent to a median increase of 10kg or more ( Supplementary figure 1). While weight gains less than 10kg were not generally associated with DM risk. These findings of increased risk as BMI changes increase is consistent with studies in both the general population and among studies of people with HIV16. In the VACS, for all baseline BMI levels, 12-month weight change was linearly associated with incident DM16. Including DM as an outcome demonstrates the robustness of our methodology and is a strength to this study. However, there are some limitations to our analyses. First, we could not assess the impact of INSTIs, as the D:A:D largely predated INSTI use, with follow-up ceasing in 2016. Second, there are no behavioural data collected including diet and exercise. Third, BMI is not a perfect anthropometric measure for CVD risk, and the use of waist:hip ratio or another similar assessment may improve accuracy, but is not available in the D:A:D study. Further, BMI poorly discriminates between lean body mass and fat body mass, which can be influenced by sex, age, and race/ethnicity21. Finally, even in this very large cohort collaboration, we had low event rates in the very low and very high BMI categories, and so limited power to disentangle BMI changes from baseline BMI level. The cut-offs we chose for our analyses were driven largely by sample size and ensuring sufficient event numbers in each group. We were also unable to explore events at very high BMI levels (>35 kg/m2), as well as limited to explore the effects in detail among women, and by race where recent data suggest differential impact of ART use and weight gain on women and black race4.

In summary, we found that increasing change in BMI was not associated with an increased risk of CVD apart from larger decreases of BMI at lower baseline BMI levels, whilst a consistent linear association with increases in BMI change was shown for DM risk. In the context of increased weight change due to newer ART classes the extent to which these results apply is unclear. For people with low BMI, weight gain may be beneficial for reducing CVD risk, however, for those with normal and high BMI, increase in weight appears not to have any impact on CVD risk. Whilst weight gain at any level of BMI linearly increases the risk of DM. Data from recent clinical trials report increases in weight following commencement of ART among individuals starting on INSTI, in particular DTG, as well as TAF1,5. These increases are more pronounced among women than men, although from our study, the implications of our findings remain the same.. As people with HIV are increasingly exposed to new ART agents, in particular INSTI or TAF, data from large cohort studies are needed.

Supplementary Material

1

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding:

Data on Adverse Events (D:A:D) Study:The D:A:D study was supported by a grant [grant number DNRF126] from the Danish National Research Foundation (CHIP & PERSIMUNE); the Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Oversight Committee (HAARTOC), a collaborative committee with representation from academic institutions, the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, the United States Food and Drug Administration, the patient community, and pharmaceutical companies with licensed anti-HIV drugs in the European Union: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences Inc., ViiV Healthcare, Merck & Co Inc. and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Supported also by a grant from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport through the Center for Infectious Disease Control of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment to Stiching HIV Monitoring (ATHENA); by a grant from the Agence nationale de recherches sur le sida et les hépatites virales [ANRS, Action Coordonnée no.7, Cohortes] to the Aquitaine Cohort; The Australian HIV Observational Database (AHOD) is funded as part of the Asia Pacific HIV Observational Database, a program of The Foundation for AIDS Research, amfAR, and is supported in part by a grant from the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [grant number U01-AI069907] and by unconditional grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme; Gilead Sciences; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Boehringer Ingelheim; Janssen-Cilag; ViiV Healthcare. The Kirby Institute is funded by The Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, and is affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales; by grants from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria [grant number FIS 99/0887] and Fundación para la Investigación y la Prevención del SIDA en Espanã [grant number FIPSE 3171/00], to the Barcelona Antiretroviral Surveillance Study (BASS); by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health [grants number 5U01AI042170-10, 5U01AI046362-03], to the Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA); by primary funding provided by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under EuroCoord grant agreement n° 260694 and unrestricted grants by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen R&D, Merck and Co. Inc., Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC, (the participation of centres from Switzerland is supported by The Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 108787)) to the EuroSIDA study; by unrestricted educational grants of AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Janssen Pharmaceuticals to the Italian Cohort Naive to Antiretrovirals (The ICONA Foundation); and financed within the framework of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant #148522) and by the SHCS research foundation

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bernardino JI, Mocroft A, Wallet C, et al. Body composition and adipokines changes after initial treatment with darunavir-ritonavir plus either raltegravir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine: A substudy of the NEAT001/ANRS143 randomised trial. PloS one. 2019;14(1):e0209911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Group NAS, Kouanfack C, Mpoudi-Etame M, et al. Dolutegravir-Based or Low-Dose Efavirenz-Based Regimen for the Treatment of HIV-1. The New England journal of medicine. 2019;381(9):816–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Norwood J, Turner M, Bofill C, et al. Brief Report: Weight Gain in Persons With HIV Switched From Efavirenz-Based to Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor-Based Regimens. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2017;76(5):527–531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sax PE, Erlandson KM, Lake JE, et al. Weight Gain Following Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy: Risk Factors in Randomized Comparative Clinical Trials. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2020;71(6):1379–1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Menard A, Meddeb L, Tissot-Dupont H, et al. Dolutegravir and weight gain: an unexpected bothering side effect? Aids. 2017;31(10):1499–1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCutchan JA, Marquie-Beck JA, Fitzsimons CA, et al. Role of obesity, metabolic variables, and diabetes in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Neurology. 2012;78(7):485–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mulligan K, Harris DR, Monte D, et al. Obesity and dyslipidemia in behaviorally HIV-infected young women: Adolescent Trials Network study 021. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2010;50(1):106–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kim DJ, Westfall AO, Chamot E, et al. Multimorbidity patterns in HIV-infected patients: the role of obesity in chronic disease clustering. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2012;61(5):600–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bays HE, Chapman RH, Grandy S, Group SI. The relationship of body mass index to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: comparison of data from two national surveys. Int J Clin Pract. 2007;61(5):737–747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Flint AJ, Rexrode KM, Hu FB, et al. Body mass index, waist circumference, and risk of coronary heart disease: a prospective study among men and women. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2010;4(3):e171–e181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bogers RP, Bemelmans WJ, Hoogenveen RT, et al. Association of overweight with increased risk of coronary heart disease partly independent of blood pressure and cholesterol levels: a meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies including more than 300 000 persons. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(16):1720–1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sullivan PW, Morrato EH, Ghushchyan V, Wyatt HR, Hill JO. Obesity, inactivity, and the prevalence of diabetes and diabetes-related cardiovascular comorbidities in the U.S., 2000–2002. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(7):1599–1603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Achhra AC, Sabin C, Ryom L, et al. Body Mass Index and the Risk of Serious Non-AIDS Events and All-Cause Mortality in Treated HIV-Positive Individuals: D: A: D Cohort Analysis. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2018;78(5):579–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Berrington de Gonzalez A, Hartge P, Cerhan JR, et al. Body-mass index and mortality among 1.46 million white adults. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;363(23):2211–2219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Achhra AC, Mocroft A, Reiss P, et al. Short-term weight gain after antiretroviral therapy initiation and subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: the D:A:D study. HIV medicine. 2016;17(4):255–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Herrin M, Tate JP, Akgun KM, et al. Weight Gain and Incident Diabetes Among HIV-Infected Veterans Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy Compared With Uninfected Individuals. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. 2016;73(2):228–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Friis-Moller N, Sabin CA, Weber R, et al. Combination antiretroviral therapy and the risk of myocardial infarction. The New England journal of medicine. 2003;349(21):1993–2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Song X, Pitkaniemi J, Gao W, et al. Relationship between body mass index and mortality among Europeans. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(2):156–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koethe JR, Jenkins CA, Turner M, et al. Body mass index and the risk of incident noncommunicable diseases after starting antiretroviral therapy. HIV medicine. 2015;16(1):67–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yuh B, Tate J, Butt AA, et al. Weight change after antiretroviral therapy and mortality. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2015;60(12):1852–1859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bailin SS, Gabriel CL, Wanjalla CN, Koethe JR. Obesity and Weight Gain in Persons with HIV. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020;17(2):138–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES