Skip to main content
Frontiers in Pharmacology logoLink to Frontiers in Pharmacology
. 2023 Oct 4;14:1267445. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1267445

Beneficial effects of ginkgetin on improving nonalcoholic steatohepatitis characterized by bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing analysis

Chaoyang Wang 1,, Yaowei Bai 1,, Tongqiang Li 2,, Jiacheng Liu 1, Yingliang Wang 1, Shuguang Ju 1, Wei Yao 1, Bin Xiong 2, Guofeng Zhou 1,*
PMCID: PMC10582714  PMID: 37860111

Abstract

Background and aims: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has become one of the major causes of cirrhosis and liver failure. However, there are currently no approved medications for managing NASH. Our study was designed to assess the effects of ginkgetin on NASH and the involved mechanisms.

Methods: We constructed a mouse model of NASH by high-fat diet for 24 weeks. The effects of ginkgetin on NASH were evaluated by histological study, Western blot, and biochemical analysis. RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis was used to investigate the alteration in gene expression and signaling pathways at bulk and single-cell levels.

Results: Administration of ginkgetin resulted in a marked improvement in hepatic lipid accumulation, inflammation, and fibrosis in the NASH model. And these results were supported by bulk RNA-Seq analysis, in which the related signaling pathways and gene expression were markedly downregulated. Furthermore, single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) analysis revealed that the effects of ginkgetin on NASH were associated with the reprogramming of macrophages, hepatic stellate cells, and endothelial cells. Especially, ginkgetin induced a marked decrease in macrophages and a shift from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory phenotype in NASH mice. And the NASH-associated macrophages (NAMs), which emerge during NASH, were also significantly downregulated by ginkgetin.

Conclusion: Ginkgetin exhibits beneficial effects on improving NASH, supported by bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq. Our study may promote pharmacological therapy for NASH and raise the existent understanding of NASH.

Keywords: ginkgetin, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, NASH, bulk, single cell, RNA sequecing

Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), mainly caused by overnutrition or genetic defects, has been a major health concern worldwide, with a prevalence of 22.1%–28.6% (Younossi et al., 2018; Powell et al., 2021). NASH is an advanced stage of NAFLD, characterized by hepatocyte steatosis and ballooning, hepatic inflammation, and apoptotic body (Schuster et al., 2018). And NASH has a high risk of developing liver fibrosis, which can potentially advance to liver cirrhosis or cancer (Schuppan et al., 2018; Pinter et al., 2023). In addition, NASH is closely associated with cardiovascular diseases (Cai et al., 2019). Diet control and enhanced exercise are recommended for NASH treatment, but with limited effectiveness (Chalasani et al., 2018; Akuta et al., 2023). Therefore, investigating effective pharmaceutical therapy is currently necessary and urgent.

Traditional Chinese medicine has greatly contributed to the Chinese people’s health over the past thousands of years, especially in epidemic and metabolic diseases (Tu, 2016; Ma et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2022). In recent years, growing studies have been performed to investigate the mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine using modern medical methods and achieved excellent results (Wang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). Ginkgetin is a compound extracted from Ginkgo biloba leaves and exerts anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor activities (Zhang et al., 2017; Adnan et al., 2020; Lou et al., 2021; Menezes and Diederich, 2021). Cho et al. (2019)reported that ginkgetin inhibits adipogenesis by regulating STAT5/PPARγ/CEBPα signaling. Wu et al. (2022) reported that ginkgetin ameliorates cardiomyopathy caused by obesity through Nrf2/ARE signaling. However, whether ginkgetin has activity against NASH is still unknown.

Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) has been extensively utilized in experimental and translational research (Kuksin et al., 2021; Thind et al., 2021). However, bulk RNA-Seq failed to evaluate cell heterogeneity as it only measures the global expression. The emergence of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) enables the investigation of cell heterogeneity at the single-cell level, which has been applied in NASH-related studies (Xiong et al., 2019; Hendrikx et al., 2022). In this study, we investigate the impacts of ginkgetin on NASH and the alteration in gene expression profile using bulk and scRNA-Seq analysis.

Materials and methods

Animal experiments

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with NIH guidelines and were approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College (Wuhan, China). Male C57BL/6J mice aged 8 weeks were purchased from Tongji Medical College and were provided controllable circumstances (a temperature of 20°C–22°C, 12-h light/dark cycle, and unlimited access to food and water). For a duration of 24 weeks, the mice were provided either a chow diet or a high-fat diet (HFD). Ginkgetin was purchased from Climax Biotech Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). Vehicle (DMSO) or ginkgetin (10 mg/kg/day) was administrated intragastrically in the last 8 weeks. The mice were separated into three groups: The chow diet group, the HFD + vehicle group, and the HFD + ginkgetin group.

Fasting body weight (FBW) of all the mice was measured every 4 weeks. Liver weight (LW) was measured after the mice were killed. The indicators related to liver function (the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in the serum) and lipid metabolism (the levels of triglyceride and cholesterol in the serum and liver tissues) were measured by commercial kits (Servicebio Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). The levels of TREM2 in the serum were measured by ELISA kits (Servicebio).

Histological study

The liver samples were preserved in 4% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde once the mice were sacrificed. After being dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, the samples were sliced into sections of 5 μm thick. To assess liver fibrosis, the sections underwent staining with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) as well as Sirius red. Lipid accumulation in the liver was assessed by staining frozen sections with Oil red O. The images were acquired through light microscopy (Nikon, Japan). For immunofluorescence, the sections were incubated consecutively with primary and secondary antibodies and 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). After quenching tissue autofluorescence, the images were acquired using fluorescent microscopy (Nikon). Supplementary Table S1 displayed the antibodies for immunofluorescence.

Western blot

Equal proteins obtained from liver tissues were subjected to gel electrophoresis and subsequently transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. Afterward, the membranes were exposed to primary and secondary antibodies. The protein bands were detected by a chemiluminescence system (Clinix Co., Ltd., China). Supplementary Table S1 displayed the antibodies for Western blot.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

The liver tissues were put into the electron microscope fixation solution (Servicebio) immediately after isolation and cut into small blocks about 2 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm. The tissues were stored at room temperature for 4 h away from light and transferred to 4°C for storage. After dehydration, drying, and gold-coated treatment, the prepared specimens were detected by an SEM (SU8010, Hitachi, Japan).

Bulk RNA-Seq analysis

We performed bulk RNA-Seq analysis on the liver tissues of mice with NASH treated with vehicle or ginkgetin (n = 3 per group). Trizol reagent (Servicebio) was utilized to extract total RNA from the liver tissues. mRNA with poly-A was isolated from total RNA and converted to complementary DNA (cDNA). RNA-Seq array was conducted on the Illumina Novaseq6000 platform. After getting the expression matrix, DESeq2 was used to calculate the difference between the two groups. Differently expressed genes (DEGs) were considered as fold change (FC) > 2 and adjust p < 0.05. Further analyses were performed using the corresponding R packages. The raw data of RNA-Seq were available in the GEO database with number GSE235797.

scRNA-seq analysis

Liver non-parenchymal cells (LNPCs) were isolated from liver tissues of mice with NASH treated with vehicle or ginkgetin as previously described (Mederacke et al., 2015). Then LNPCs were used for scRNA-Seq by 10X Genomics Chromium system (n = 3 per group). Quality control was performed by Seurat (version 4.3.0), and only the single cells with the unique molecular identifier (UMI) between 250 and 5,000 and mitochondrial genes <5% were used for further analysis. The clusters were identified by marker genes according to the CellMarker database (Hu et al., 2023). Visual analysis was performed using R packages. The raw data of scRNA-Seq were available in the GEO database with number GSE235939.

Macrophage polarization index (MPI)

MPI describes all the polarized states of macrophages. Based on scRNA-Seq, the MPI value of each macrophage was calculated according to a well-established model (M0: unstimulated; MI: stimulated with LPS and IFNγ; M2: stimulated with IL4 and IL13) (Li et al., 2019). A higher MPI value indicates that the macrophage is closer to a pro-inflammatory state of M1, and vice versa, a lower MPI value indicates an anti-inflammatory state of M2.

Statistical analysis

The data were shown as mean ± SD and the difference was compared by t-test. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 23.0 (IBM, United States). p < 0.05 was considered an indicator of statistical significance.

Results

Effects of ginkgetin on HFD-induced hepatic steatosis

The chemical formula of ginkgetin was shown in Figure 1A. We first evaluated the impacts of ginkgetin on hepatic steatosis in a NASH mouse model induced by HFD. Administration of HFD resulted in a clear increase in FBW, LW, and LW/FBW ratio, which was significantly improved by ginkgetin (Figures 1B–D). And ginkgetin-treated mice also showed reduced levels of hepatic and serum triglyceride and cholesterol (Figures 1E,F). Additionally, HE staining revealed that the hepatocyte steatosis and ballooning were markedly alleviated with reduced NAFLD activity score (NAS) after ginkgetin treatment. And Oil red O staining confirmed the reduced lipid accumulation in ginkgetin-treated mice (Figure 1G). Consistently, the protein expression of FASN and PPARγ, which are associated with lipid metabolism, were significantly downregulated by ginkgetin (Figure 1H).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Effects of ginkgetin on HFD-induced hepatic steatosis. (A) The chemical formula of ginkgetin. (B) Changes in fasting body weight (FBW) over time in the chow diet, HFD + Veh, and HFD + Gink groups (n = 6). (C) Liver weight (LW) of the mice at the end of experiments (n = 6). (D) Liver index (FBW/LW) (n = 6). (E) Biochemical analysis of hepatic triglyceride (TG) and cholesterol (Chol) (n = 6). (F) Biochemical analysis of serum TG and Chol (n = 6). (G) HE and Oil red O staining of liver tissues (n = 6). Scale bar = 50 μm. (H) Western blot analysis of FASN and PPARγ (n = 3). *: p < 0.05, chow diet vs. HFD + Veh groups. #: p < 0.05, HFD + Veh vs. HFD + Gink groups.

Effects of ginkgetin on HFD-induced hepatic inflammation and fibrosis

Immunofluorescence of F4/80 showed a marked increase in macrophage infiltration in mice with NASH, indicating enhanced hepatic inflammation, which was reduced in ginkgetin-treated mice (Figure 2A). And HFD-induced fibrosis, shown by Sirius red, was also improved after ginkgetin treatment (Figure 2A). Moreover, these histological alterations were supported by the level of proteins associated with inflammation (TNFα and p65) and fibrosis (COL1A1), which were overexpressed in NASH mice and reduced after ginkgetin treatment (Figure 2B). In addition, ginkgetin-treated mice showed improved liver function, shown by decreased ALT and AST (Figure 2C).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Effects of ginkgetin on HFD-induced hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. (A) F4/80 immunofluorescence and Sirus red staining of liver tissues in the chow diet, HFD + Veh, and HFD + Gink groups (n = 6). Scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Western blot analysis of proteins related to hepatic inflammation (TNFα and p65) and fibrosis (COL1A1) (n = 3). (C) The levels of ALT and AST in the three groups (n = 6). *: p < 0.05, chow diet vs. HFD + Veh groups. #: p < 0.05, HFD + Veh vs. HFD + Gink groups.

Bulk RNA-Seq analysis of liver tissues from vehicle- and ginkgetin-treated mice with NASH

To further investigate the process of ginkgetin-induced regression of NASH, we performed RNA-Seq analysis of liver tissues from NASH mice treated with vehicle or ginkgetin (n = 3 per group). The two groups could be clearly distinguished by principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure 3A). And 1,199 DEGs were observed, among which 406 were upregulated and 793 were downregulated by ginkgetin (Figures 3B, C). Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that the signals associated with lipid metabolism, inflammation, and fibrosis were enriched and downregulated (Figure 3D; Supplementary Table S2). Consistently, the expression of related genes was downregulated by ginkgetin (Figure 3E).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Bulk RNA-Seq analysis on liver tissues from NASH mice treated with vehicle and ginkgetin. (A) Principal component analysis between HFD + Veh and HFD + Gink groups (n = 3). (B) Heatmap of DEGs between the two groups. (C) Difference in gene expression between the two groups shown by volcano plot. (D) GSEA showed that the signals associated with lipid metabolism, hepatic inflammation and fibrosis were downregulated by ginkgetin. (E) Differences in gene expression based on GSEA.

scRNA-seq analysis of LNPC from vehicle- and ginkgetin-treated mice with NASH

scRNA-seq analysis was conducted to explore the cellular heterogeneity in LNPCs isolated from NASH mice treated with vehicle or ginkgetin (n = 3), which are essential in regulating the process of NASH. After quality control filtering, transcriptomes of 26,160 cells were obtained, including 11,754 cells from vehicle-treated mice and 14,406 from ginkgetin-treated mice. And UMAP dimensionality reduction analysis revealed that the cells were divided into ten clusters according to the marker genes, including endothelial cells, hepatocytes, macrophages, B cells, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), T-cells, dendritic cells, cholangiocytes, NK cells, and Mast cells (Figures 4A–D). And the cell counts and percent were presented (Figures 4E, F). Remarkably, we observed that endothelial cells and macrophages were the most abundant clusters of LNPCs, accounting for 57.2% of the LNPCs. And 75.3% of endothelial cells were from ginkgetin-treated mice, whereas 76.0% of macrophages were from vehicle-treated mice. Additionally, ginkgetin-induced alteration in gene expression was mainly reflected in macrophages and HSCs with a marked reduction (Figure 4G). These data suggested that the impacts of ginkgetin on NASH may be associated with the reprogramming of macrophages, HSCs, and endothelial cells.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

scRNA-Seq analysis of liver cells from HFD + Veh or HFD + Gink groups. (A) UMAP plot revealed that the liver cells were divided into 10 clusters based on marker genes. (B) UMAP plot for liver cells from HFD + Veh and HFD + Gink groups. (C) marker gene expression for the 10 clusters shown by violin plots. (D) Top 10 marker genes of the 10 clusters shown by heatmap. (E) Cell percent of the 10 clusters in each sample. (F) Cell counts of the 10 clusters in the two groups. (G) Changes in gene expression by ginkgetin in the 10 clusters between HFD + Veh and HFD + Gink groups.

Effects of ginkgetin on hepatic macrophages in NASH mice

4,419 macrophages were retained in scRNA-Seq analysis, which were further divided into two subclusters, including Kupffer cells (KCs, high expression of Adgre1) and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs, high expression of Itgam) (Figures 5A, B). And ginkgetin induced a significant reduction in macrophages, especially in KCs (Figure 5C). In addition, we also assessed macrophage polarization using MPI based on scRNA-Seq. As expected, we observed a marked alteration toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype in both KCs and MDMs after ginkgetin treatment (Figure 5D).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Effects of ginkgetin on hepatic macrophages in NASH mice. (A) Kupffer cells (KCs) and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) and their marker genes shown by UMAP plot. (B) Marker gene expression of KCs and MDMs shown by violin plots. (C) Cell counts of KCs and MDMs in HFD + Veh and HFD + Gink groups. (D) MPI of KCs and MDMs in the two groups. (E) Subcluster of Trem2 high expression macrophage. (F) Western blot analysis of TREM2 in the chow diet, HFD + Veh, and HFD + Gink groups (n = 3). (G) TREM2 immunofluorescence of liver tissues from the three groups (n = 6). Scale bar = 50 μm. (H) Levels of serum TREM2 in the three groups (n = 6). *: p < 0.05, chow diet vs. HFD + Veh groups. #: p < 0.05, HFD + Veh vs. HFD + Gink groups.

Next, we analyzed the alteration of NASH-associated macrophages (NAMs), which are subcluster of KCs with high expression of Trem2 (25). NAMs emerge during NASH and play a protective role against NASH. And the level of NAMs is positively correlated with the severity of NASH. Consistent with the improvement of lipid accumulation in the liver, NAMs markedly decreased in ginkgetin-treated mice (Figure 5E). Additionally, both Western blot and Immunofluorescence revealed that the level of TREM2 was significantly downregulated by ginkgetin (Figures 5F, G). Meanwhile, we also measured the level of TREM2 in the serum, which is a circulated marker of NASH and has a positive correction with NAMs (Hendrikx et al., 2022). Accordingly, the elevated TREM2 in serum during NASH also decreased after ginkgetin treatment (Figure 5H).

Effect of ginkgetin on HSCs in NASH mice

HSC activation, marked by high expression of Acta2, is a core step for liver fibrosis (Higashi et al., 2017). scRNA-Seq analysis revealed a significant decrease in the expression of Acta2 in ginkgetin-treated mice (Figure 6A), which was supported by the Immunofluorescence of αSMA (encoded by Acta2) (Figure 6B). Then, we performed KEGG enrichment analysis of the DEGs specially derived from HSCs. In addition to the pathways associated with lipid metabolism, we also discovered that JAK/STAT pathway was enriched (Figure 6C). Increasing evidence has demonstrated that JAK/STAT pathway was essential for HSC activation, especially IL6/STAT3 pathway and IFNγ/STAT1 pathways (Gao et al., 2012; Deng et al., 2013; Su et al., 2015; Xiang et al., 2018; Marti-Rodrigo et al., 2020). Triggering IL6/STAT3 signaling enhances HSC activation and liver fibrosis, while IFNγ/STAT1 signaling exhibits opposite effects. GSEA revealed that ginkgetin induced a marked downregulation in IL6/STAT3 signaling, but no alteration in IFNγ/STAT1 signaling (Figure 6D). Furthermore, immunofluorescence showed an increase in pSTAT3 and DCN (mainly expressed by HSCs) with a close colocation in NASH mice, which was abolished after ginkgetin treatment (Figure 6E). These results suggested that IL6/STAT3 signaling may be associated with ginkgetin-induced inhibition of HSC activation and liver fibrosis.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Effects of ginkgetin on hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in NASH mice. (A) Activated HSCs marked by Acta2 shown by UMAP plot. (B) αSMA immunofluorescence of liver tissues from chow diet, HFD + Veh, and HFD + Gink groups (n = 6). Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs between HFD + Veh and HFD + Gink groups. (D) GSEA showing the ginkgetin-induced alteration in IFNγ- and IL6-mediated signaling. (E) pSTAT3 and DCN immunofluorescence of liver tissues from chow diet, HFD + Veh, and HFD + Gink groups (n = 6). Scale bar = 50 μm *: p < 0.05, chow diet vs. HFD + Veh groups. #: p < 0.05, HFD + Veh vs. HFD + Gink groups.

Effects of hepatic endothelial cells in NASH mice

Endothelial cells make up the largest cluster of LNPCs, which can be further divided into three subclusters, including liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs, high expression of Fcgr2b), per-portal endothelial cells (PPECs, high expression of Efnb1), and peri-central endothelial cells (PCECs, high expression of Wnt2) (Figure 7A). Cluster analysis revealed individual transcriptomic features in the three subclusters (Figure 7B). And in vehicle-treated mice, the main type of endothelial cells was PPECs, while LSECs became the dominant type after ginkgetin treatment (Figure 7C). Consistently, immunofluorescence of vWF showed that NASH resulted in a marked decrease of endothelial cells, which was restored to the normal level after ginkgetin treatment (Figure 7D). Furthermore, SEM analysis revealed that the number of LSEC fenestrae markedly reduced due to NASH, but increased in ginkgetin-treated mice (Figure 7E).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Effects of ginkgetin on hepatic endothelial cells in NASH mice. (A) Endothelial cells were divided into three subclusters by marker genes shown by UMAP plot. (B) Cell counts of the three subclusters in HFD + Veh and HFD + Gink groups. (C) Gene expression in the three subclusters shown by heatmap. (D) vWF immunofluorescence of liver tissues from chow diet, HFD + Veh, and HFD + Gink groups (n = 6). Scale bar = 50 μm. (E) SEM analysis of fenestrae in LSECs (n = 6). Scale bar = 1 μm *: p < 0.05, chow diet vs. HFD + Veh groups. #: p < 0.05, HFD + Veh vs. HFD + Gink groups.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that ginkgetin exhibits beneficial effects on NASH, including reducing lipid accumulation and inhibiting hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. And these results were supported by bulk RNA-Seq analysis, in which the related signaling pathways and gene expression were markedly downregulated. Furthermore, we assessed the alteration in gene profile by scRNA-Seq, which further uncovered the mechanism of ginkgetin-induced NASH alleviation.

Previous studies have demonstrated that excessive lipid accumulation in hepatocytes is the primary and driving factor for NASH progression by triggering oxidative stress and releasing inflammatory cytokines (Schuster et al., 2018; Haas et al., 2019). And the cytokines enhance inflammatory cell infiltration and hepatocellular injury. Remarkably, ginkgetin induced a clear decrease in lipid accumulation in hepatocytes with improved liver function, which was supported by the downregulation of gene expression and signaling pathways associated with lipid metabolism. These exciting results urged us to explore the involved mechanisms, especially focusing on LNPCs, which are essential in regulating the process of NASH(Xiong et al., 2019).

Among LNPCs, macrophages occupy a central place in NASH pathogenesis and have been considered potential therapeutic targets. And macrophages exhibit strong heterogeneity in performing various complex functions. In this study, scRNA-Seq analysis showed that macrophages not only markedly decreased in number but also shifted from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory phenotype, which was supported by the histological study and RNA-Seq analysis. We also pay attention to NAMs, which are present during NASH and characterized by high expression of Trem2. Recent studies indicated that NAMs play a protective role against NASH by enhancing NAM-dependent efferocytosis of apoptotic hepatocytes caused by lipid overload (Hou et al., 2021; Hendrikx et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023). And the level of NAMs is positively correlated with the severity of NASH. Consistent with the improvement of lipid accumulation in the liver, ginkgetin induced a marked decrease in NAMs, evidenced by scRNA-Seq, Western blot, and immunofluorescence. Further studies are necessary to investigate whether the impacts on macrophages are directly caused by ginkgetin or secondary to other effects.

NASH has a high risk of developing fibrosis by activating HSCs (Schuppan et al., 2018). In this study, liver fibrosis caused by NASH was markedly suppressed by ginkgetin. Moreover, we observed that the downregulation of IL6/STAT3 signaling was involved in the ginkgetin-induced inhibition of HSC activation. Previous studies have also suggested that IL6/STAT3 signaling was a promising target for treating liver fibrosis (Deng et al., 2013; Su et al., 2015; Xiang et al., 2018; Marti-Rodrigo et al., 2020). Thus, our study could potentially provide a therapeutic strategy for chronic liver fibrosis.

Finally, we assessed the impacts of ginkgetin on endothelial cells in NASH mice. Unlike the anti-angiogenesis mechanism in treating liver fibrosis (Gao et al., 2016; Winkler et al., 2021), our data indicated that ginkgetin promotes hepatic angiogenesis and endothelial cell proliferation. We speculated that the reasons might be as follows: hepatic angiogenesis is a compensatory mechanism of portal hypertension in liver fibrosis, and in turn, angiogenesis promotes fibrosis (Parola and Pinzani, 2019; Gracia-Sancho et al., 2021). Therefore, it is effective to treat liver fibrosis by inhibiting angiogenesis. Contrary to liver fibrosis, hepatic angiogenesis decreases during NASH due to the damage of endothelial cells by abnormal lipid metabolism. Thus, the recovery of endothelial cells after ginkgetin treatment might be secondary to the reduced lipid accumulation in the liver. Moreover, ginkgetin induced a marked increase in LSEC fenestrae, which promoted the substance exchange between hepatocytes and portal vein.

In conclusion, this study provided evidence that ginkgetin ameliorates NASH with a unique perspective at bulk and single-cell levels. These data may promote pharmacological therapy for NASH and raise the existent understanding of NASH.

Funding Statement

The authors declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873917).

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), GSE235939 and GSE235797.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College (Wuhan, China). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

CW: Conceptualization, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Visualization, Writing–original draft. YB: Data curation, Investigation, Software, Supervision, Writing–original draft. TL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing–original draft. JL: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing–original draft. YW: Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing–original draft. SJ: Project administration, Resources, Visualization, Writing–original draft. WY: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Validation, Writing–original draft. BX: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Writing–review and editing. GZ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing–review and editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1267445/full#supplementary-material

Glossary

Acta2 Actin alpha 2
Adgre1 Adhesion G protein-coupled receptor E1
ALT Alanine aminotransferase
ARE Androgen response elements
AST Aspartate aminotransferase
cDNA Complementary DNA
CEBPα Recombinant CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein Alpha
COL1A1 Collagen Type I Alpha 1
CST Cell signaling technology
DAPI 4,6-diamino-2-phenyl indole
DCN Decorin
DEG Differently expressed gene
DMSO Dimethyl sulfoxide
ECM Extracellular matrix
Efnb1 Ephrin-B1
ELISA Enzyme-linked immunospecific assay
FASN Fatty acid synthase
FBW Fasting body weight
FC Fold change
Fcgr2b Fc fragment of IgG receptor IIb
FDR False discovery rate
GAPDH Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
GEO Gene expression omnibus
GSEA Gene set enrichment analysis
HE Hematoxylin-eosin
HFD High-fat diet
HSC Hepatic stellate cell
IL Interleukin
Itgam Integrin subunit alpha M
JAK Janus kinase
KC Kupffer cell
KEGG Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes
LNPC Liver non-parenchymal cell
LPS Lipopolysaccharide
LSEC Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell
LW Liver weight
MDM Monocyte-derived macrophage
MPI Macrophage polarization index
NAFLD Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
NAM NASH-associated macrophage
NAS NAFLD activity score
NASH Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
NF-κB Nuclear factor kappa-B
NIH National Institutes of Health
NK Natural killer cell
Nrf2 Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2
PCA Principal component analysis
PCEC Peri-central endothelial cell
PPARγ Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma
PPEC Per-portal endothelial cell
PVDF Polyvinylidene fluoride
RIPA Radio immunoprecipitation assay
scRNA-Seq Single-cell RNA sequencing
SEM Scanning electron microscopy
SMA Smooth muscle actin
STAT Signal transducer and activator of transcription
TNFα Tumor necrosis factor alpha
Trem2 Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2
UMAP Uniform manifold approximation and projection
UMI Unique molecular identifier
vWF Von Willebrand factor

References

  1. Adnan M., Rasul A., Hussain G., Shah M. A., Zahoor M. K., Anwar H., et al. (2020). Ginkgetin: A natural biflavone with versatile pharmacological activities. Food Chem. Toxicol. 145, 111642. 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akuta N., Kawamura Y., Fujiyama S., Nakamichi K., Saegusa E., Ogura H., et al. (2023). Treatment efficacy of diet and exercise program for fatty liver and pretreatment predictors. Hepatol. Res. 53, 607–617. 10.1111/hepr.13897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cai J., Xu M., Zhang X., Li H. (2019). Innate immune signaling in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular diseases. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 14, 153–184. 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-013003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chalasani N., Younossi Z., Lavine J. E., Charlton M., Cusi K., Rinella M., et al. (2018). The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 67, 328–357. 10.1002/hep.29367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen P., Zhang J., Wang C., Chai Y. H., Wu A. G., Huang N. Y., et al. (2022). The pathogenesis and treatment mechanism of Parkinson's disease from the perspective of traditional Chinese medicine. Phytomedicine 100, 154044. 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cho Y. L., Park J. G., Kang H. J., Kim W., Cho M. J., Jang J. H., et al. (2019). Ginkgetin, a biflavone from Ginkgo biloba leaves, prevents adipogenesis through STAT5-mediated PPARγ and C/EBPα regulation. Pharmacol. Res. 139, 325–336. 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.11.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng Y. R., Ma H. D., Tsuneyama K., Yang W., Wang Y. H., Lu F. T., et al. (2013). STAT3-mediated attenuation of CCl4-induced mouse liver fibrosis by the protein kinase inhibitor sorafenib. J. Autoimmun. 46, 25–34. 10.1016/j.jaut.2013.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gao B., Wang H., Lafdil F., Feng D. (2012). STAT proteins - key regulators of anti-viral responses, inflammation, and tumorigenesis in the liver. J. Hepatol. 57, 430–441. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.01.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao J. H., Wen S. L., Feng S., Yang W. J., Lu Y. Y., Tong H., et al. (2016). Celecoxib and octreotide synergistically ameliorate portal hypertension via inhibition of angiogenesis in cirrhotic rats. Angiogenesis 19, 501–511. 10.1007/s10456-016-9522-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gracia-Sancho J., Caparros E., Fernandez-Iglesias A., Frances R. (2021). Role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in liver diseases. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 411–431. 10.1038/s41575-020-00411-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haas J. T., Vonghia L., Mogilenko D. A., Verrijken A., Molendi-Coste O., Fleury S., et al. (2019). Transcriptional network analysis implicates altered hepatic immune function in NASH development and resolution. Nat. Metab. 1, 604–614. 10.1038/s42255-019-0076-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hendrikx T., Porsch F., Kiss M. G., Rajcic D., Papac-Milicevic N., Hoebinger C., et al. (2022). Soluble TREM2 levels reflect the recruitment and expansion of TREM2(+) macrophages that localize to fibrotic areas and limit NASH. J. Hepatol. 77, 1373–1385. 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Higashi T., Friedman S. L., Hoshida Y. (2017). Hepatic stellate cells as key target in liver fibrosis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 121, 27–42. 10.1016/j.addr.2017.05.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hou J., Zhang J., Cui P., Zhou Y., Liu C., Wu X., et al. (2021). TREM2 sustains macrophage-hepatocyte metabolic coordination in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and sepsis. J. Clin. Invest. 131, 131. 10.1172/jci135197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu C., Li T., Xu Y., Zhang X., Li F., Bai J., et al. (2023). CellMarker 2.0: An updated database of manually curated cell markers in human/mouse and web tools based on scRNA-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D870–D876. 10.1093/nar/gkac947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang K., Zhang P., Zhang Z., Youn J. Y., Wang C., Zhang H., et al. (2021). Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in the treatment of COVID-19 and other viral infections: Efficacies and mechanisms. Pharmacol. Ther. 225, 107843. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuksin M., Morel D., Aglave M., Danlos F. X., Marabelle A., Zinovyev A., et al. (2021). Applications of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing in onco-immunology. Eur. J. Cancer 149, 193–210. 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li C., Menoret A., Farragher C., Ouyang Z., Bonin C., Holvoet P., et al. (2019). Single cell transcriptomics based-MacSpectrum reveals novel macrophage activation signatures in diseases. JCI Insight 5, e126453. 10.1172/jci.insight.126453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li L., Wang L., Fan W., Jiang Y., Zhang C., Li J., et al. (2020). The application of fermentation technology in traditional Chinese medicine: A review. Am. J. Chin. Med. 48, 899–921. 10.1142/S0192415X20500433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lou J. S., Zhao L. P., Huang Z. H., Chen X. Y., Xu J. T., Tai W. C., et al. (2021). Ginkgetin derived from Ginkgo biloba leaves enhances the therapeutic effect of cisplatin via ferroptosis-mediated disruption of the Nrf2/HO-1 axis in EGFR wild-type non-small-cell lung cancer. Phytomedicine 80, 153370. 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ma N., Zhang Z., Liao F., Jiang T., Tu Y. (2020). The birth of artemisinin. Pharmacol. Ther. 216, 107658. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Marti-Rodrigo A., Alegre F., Moragrega A. B., Garcia-Garcia F., Marti-Rodrigo P., Fernandez-Iglesias A., et al. (2020). Rilpivirine attenuates liver fibrosis through selective STAT1-mediated apoptosis in hepatic stellate cells. Gut 69, 920–932. 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mederacke I., Dapito D. H., Affo S., Uchinami H., Schwabe R. F. (2015). High-yield and high-purity isolation of hepatic stellate cells from normal and fibrotic mouse livers. Nat. Protoc. 10, 305–315. 10.1038/nprot.2015.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Menezes J., Diederich M. F. (2021). Bioactivity of natural biflavonoids in metabolism-related disease and cancer therapies. Pharmacol. Res. 167, 105525. 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Parola M., Pinzani M. (2019). Liver fibrosis: Pathophysiology, pathogenetic targets and clinical issues. Mol. Asp. Med. 65, 37–55. 10.1016/j.mam.2018.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pinter M., Pinato D. J., Ramadori P., Heikenwalder M. (2023). NASH and hepatocellular carcinoma: Immunology and immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 29, 513–520. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Powell E. E., Wong V. W., Rinella M. (2021). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lancet 397, 2212–2224. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32511-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schuppan D., Surabattula R., Wang X. Y. (2018). Determinants of fibrosis progression and regression in NASH. J. Hepatol. 68, 238–250. 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schuster S., Cabrera D., Arrese M., Feldstein A. E. (2018). Triggering and resolution of inflammation in NASH. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 349–364. 10.1038/s41575-018-0009-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Su T. H., Shiau C. W., Jao P., Liu C. H., Liu C. J., Tai W. T., et al. (2015). Sorafenib and its derivative SC-1 exhibit antifibrotic effects through signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 inhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 7243–7248. 10.1073/pnas.1507499112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Thind A. S., Monga I., Thakur P. K., Kumari P., Dindhoria K., Krzak M., et al. (2021). Demystifying emerging bulk RNA-seq applications: the application and utility of bioinformatic methodology. Brief. Bioinform 22, 22. 10.1093/bib/bbab259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tu Y. (2016). Artemisinin-A gift from traditional Chinese medicine to the world (nobel lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 55, 10210–10226. 10.1002/anie.201601967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang J., Wong Y. K., Liao F. (2018). What has traditional Chinese medicine delivered for modern medicine? Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 20, e4. 10.1017/erm.2018.3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang T., Liu J., Luo X., Hu L., Lu H. (2021). Functional metabolomics innovates therapeutic discovery of traditional Chinese medicine derived functional compounds. Pharmacol. Ther. 224, 107824. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang X., He Q., Zhou C., Xu Y., Liu D., Fujiwara N., et al. (2023). Prolonged hypernutrition impairs TREM2-dependent efferocytosis to license chronic liver inflammation and NASH development. Immunity 56, 58–77.e11. 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.11.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Winkler M., Staniczek T., Kurschner S. W., Schmid C. D., Schonhaber H., Cordero J., et al. (2021). Endothelial GATA4 controls liver fibrosis and regeneration by preventing a pathogenic switch in angiocrine signaling. J. Hepatol. 74, 380–393. 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.08.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wu X., Huang J., Tang J., Sun Y., Zhao G., Yan C., et al. (2022). Isoginkgetin, a bioactive constituent from Ginkgo Biloba, protects against obesity-induced cardiomyopathy via enhancing Nrf2/ARE signaling. Redox Biol. 57, 102485. 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xiang D. M., Sun W., Ning B. F., Zhou T. F., Li X. F., Zhong W., et al. (2018). The HLF/IL-6/STAT3 feedforward circuit drives hepatic stellate cell activation to promote liver fibrosis. Gut 67, 1704–1715. 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Xiong X., Kuang H., Ansari S., Liu T., Gong J., Wang S., et al. (2019). Landscape of intercellular crosstalk in healthy and NASH liver revealed by single-cell secretome gene analysis. Mol. Cell 75, 644–660. 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.07.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Younossi Z., Anstee Q. M., Marietti M., Hardy T., Henry L., Eslam M., et al. (2018). Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15, 11–20. 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang J., Yang S., Chen F., Li H., Chen B. (2017). Ginkgetin aglycone ameliorates LPS-induced acute kidney injury by activating SIRT1 via inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway. Cell Biosci. 7, 44. 10.1186/s13578-017-0173-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhu R., Chen B., Bai Y., Miao T., Rui L., Zhang H., et al. (2020). Lycopene in protection against obesity and diabetes: A mechanistic review. Pharmacol. Res. 159, 104966. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), GSE235939 and GSE235797.


Articles from Frontiers in Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES