Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmias are the leading cause of sudden cardiac death. Understanding the mechanisms of arrhythmia initiation is important for developing effective therapeutics for prevention. Arrhythmias can be induced via premature external stimuli or occur spontaneously via dynamical instabilities. Computer simulations have shown that large repolarization gradient due to regional prolongation of the action potential duration can result in instabilities leading to premature excitations and arrhythmias, but the bifurcation remains to be elucidated. In this study we carry out numerical simulations and linear stability analyses using a one-dimensional heterogeneous cable consisting of the FitzHugh-Nagumo model. We show that a Hopf bifurcation leads to local oscillations, which, once their amplitudes are large enough, lead to spontaneous propagating excitations. Depending on the degree of heterogeneities, these excitations can range from one to many, and to be sustained oscillations, manifesting as premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and sustained arrhythmias. The dynamics depends on the repolarization gradient and the length of the cable. Complex dynamics are also induced by the repolarization gradient. The mechanistic insights from the simple model may help for the understanding of the genesis of PVCs and arrhythmias in long QT syndromes.
I. INTRODUCTION
The heart is an excitable media in which regular conducting electrical excitations in the ventricles result in contractions to pump oxygenated blood to the whole body. When the electrical excitations become irregular and localized, such as focal excitations and spiral waves, ventricular arrhythmias occur, which is the major cause of sudden cardiac death [1, 2]. While the mechanisms of arrhythmias, in particular the dynamics of abnormal electrical conduction and spiral waves, have been widely investigated [3–5], how the arrhythmia events are initiated in the heart remains incompletely understood.
A well-known phenomenon linking to arrhythmia initiation is called R-on-T on the electrocardiogram (ECG) [6–9]. As shown in Fig. 1(a), an early R-wave superimposed on the T-wave of the previous beat, leading to ventricular arrhythmias. Two initiation mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias linked to the R-on-T phenomenon are known [10, 11]. One is reentry initiation via trigger and substrate interactions. In this mechanism, a trigger is an R-wave that originates locally in the ventricles before the sinus beat, called premature ventricular contraction (PVC). A substrate is a tissue condition in which heterogeneities in repolarization are large. When a PVC occurs early enough, its conduction may be locally blocked in the heterogeneous region, leading to reentry or spiral waves. The other one is a spontaneous behavior in which a tissue-scale instability results in formation of PVCs and reentry. In this mechanism, the PVC is caused by enhanced repolarization gradient due to regional prolongation of the action potential duration [Fig. 1(b)], which can manifest as focal excitations or degenerate into reentry.
FIG. 1.

R-on-T phenomenon in the initiation of arrhythmias in LQTS. (a) A representative ECG showing R-on-T leading to ventricular arrhythmias. The sharp QRS wave corresponds to wavefront conduction in the heart. The domed T wave represents the repolarization phase of the heart. The time interval between the Q-wave and the end of T-wave is called QT interval, which is a measure of the repolarization of the heart. The red ”*” denotes a R-wave superimposed on the T-wave, called R-on-T, which is a typical ECG pattern preceding arrhythmias. This R-wave is a premature ventricular contraction (PVC). (b) Time and space plot of voltage showing spontaneous PVC caused by regional prolongation of repolarization in a computer model of rabbit ventricular tissue [15].
The R-on-T phenomenon is common in arrhythmogenesis in patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS) [9, 12–14]. LQTS is a diseased syndrome in which the QT [see Fig. 1(a)] is longer than the normal values, which is caused by prolongation of the action potential duration (APD) in the heart. Recent computer simulation studies have shown that regional prolongation of APD can cause the second mechanism of arrhythmia initiation, i.e., spontaneous initiation of PVCs and reentry due to APD gradients [10, 15–20]. However, a rigorous bifurcation analysis revealing the bifurcations leading to spontaneous arrhythmogenesis remains to be elucidated.
In this study, we perform bifurcation analyses to investigate the instabilities promoted by repolarization gradients in a one-dimensional cable using a simple action potential model, the FitzHugh-Nagumo (FHN) model [21, 22]. We carry out numerical simulations and linear stability analyses and show that a Hopf bifurcation leads to non-propagating localized oscillations and then propagating excitations. Depending on the degree of heterogeneities, these excitations can range from one to many, and to be sustained oscillations, manifesting as PVCs and sustained arrhythmias. The dynamics depends on the repolarization gradient and the length of the cable. Complex dynamics are also induced by the repolarization gradient. The mechanistic insights from the simple model may help for the understanding of the genesis of PVCs and arrhythmias in LQTS.
II. MODEL AND METHODS
The FHN model is a two-variable model, which is a generic model for excitable systems. Although it lacks the detailed physiological properties of cardiac myocytes, such as the ionic currents, it still captures some generic properties of excitation, repolarization, and recovery of cardiac myocytes. The one-dimensional cable model is described by the following differential equations:
| (1) |
The variable u is an analog of the membrane voltage, and v controls repolarization and recovery. D is the diffusion constant, a is a parameter determining the threshold of excitation, ϵ determines the excitability, and γ controls the excitability and recovery. b controls the decay of v, which then controls the speed of repolarization. When b is smaller than a critical value, u can repolarize normally, but when b is large enough, the system becomes bistable [see Fig. 2(a)]. Therefore, we model the repolarization heterogeneity by setting b as a function of space, i.e.,
the subscript H and L stand for high and low, respectively. LL and LH are the lengths of the bL and bH regions, respectively, and L = LL + LH is the total length of the cable. The setting is illustrated in Fig. 2(b). This heterogeneous cable can mimic cardiac tissue under the LQTS condition. First, a homogeneous stable resting state exists (despite physiological heterogeneity all ventricular myocytes possess a nearly identical resting voltage); Second, the heterogeneity mimics the regional difference of repolarization in realistic ventricles. Note that in the H region of the 1D cable, the FHN is bistable when uncoupled. This bistable behavior is equivalent to repolarization failure seen in cardiac myocytes under diseased conditions, such as heart failure and LQTS [23–27]. In other words, repolarization failure is a consequence of bistability. Moreover, it has been shown [28] that this same bistability is responsible for the very long action potential widely observed in experiments [23–27], which is facilitated by the slowly repolarizing currents in cardiac myocytes. However, there is no such a slow repolarizing component in the FHN model and thus we cannot simulate the very long action potential as seen in cardiac myocytes. On the other hand, in the heterogeneous 1D cable, due to diffusive coupling, the H region can still repolarize with very long action potential for a certain range of the bH value (see Fig. 3). As shown in Appendix D, the dynamics of a 1D heterogeneous cable with FHN model can well capture the dynamics of that with a more detailed cardiac action potential model. Hence the present model could be a proper model for excitation dynamics in ventricular tissue under long QT condition.
FIG. 2.

The 1D cable model. (a) The null-clines of the FHN model. The slope of the straight line representing u = bv determines excitable (black, labeled b = bL) or bistable (magenta labeled b = bH) property. (b) The spatial heterogeneity of the cable. Unless specified, bH > 5.9211 in the right magenta region (with a length of LH), and bL < 5.9211 in the left black region (with a length of LL). For numerical simulation, the cable is discretized into N grid points as indicated in the bottom.
FIG. 3.

Oscillatory behaviors induced by a repolarization gradient. (a) The bH-bL phase plane showing excitation behaviors. γ=1. The typical behaviors of different regions are shown in (b)–(f). The black dashed curve separating the green and yellow region is the Hopf bifurcation line obtained via bifurcation analysis. Panels (b)–(f) are space-time plots of u(x,t) for different bH values marked on the vertical line on panel (a). bL = 1.5. The upper magenta traces are u(x,t) in the bH region. (b) bH = 20. Stable steady state. (c) bH = 11. Regional oscillations without excitations. (d) bH = 8. Oscillations leading to propagating excitations. The spontaneous excitations are marked by the red ”*”. (e) bH = 7.0767. Transient excitations. (f) bH = 6. Normal repolarization in the whole cable.
An explicit Euler method is used to integrate Eq.(1) with Δt = 0.001 and Δx = 0.05, and thus the number of the grid points is N = L/Δx (a grid point can be regarded as a cell). No-flux boundary condition is used. A single stimulus (with duration 0.01 and magnitude 30) is delivered to the bH-end [the Nth cell, see Fig. 2(b)] to initially excite the cable. ϵ = 0.01, D = 1.0 and a = 0.1 are fixed throughout the paper. Except in sections V and VI, NH = 50 and NL = 100 (N = NH + NL = 150) are fixed. Linear stability analysis of the steady state is carried out. To derive the steady-state solutions of an inhomogeneous cable is not a trivial task. We design a numerical method to search out all the solutions of the cable, which is demonstrated in Appendix A.
III. BIFURCATIONS TO TRANSIENT AND OSCILLATORY EXCITATIONS
This section investigates the bifurcations and different excitation behaviors of the 1D heterogeneous cable. Figure 3(a) shows the excitation behaviors in the bH–bL plane. Figs. 3(b)–3(f) show typical excitation behaviors after a single stimulation for bL = 1.5 and different bH. When bH is large [the green region in Fig. 3(a)], repolarization fails in the bH region while repolarizes normally in the bL region [Fig. 3(b)]. Transient oscillations occur in the gradient region. When bH is reduced [yellow region in Fig. 3(a)], the oscillations in the gradient region become stationary, however, these oscillations cannot propagate out the gradient region to form PVCs [Fig. 3(c)]. When bH is reduced further [red region in Fig. 3(a)], the oscillations propagate into PVCs [Fig. 3(d)]. In a very narrow region [gray in Fig. 3(a)], the bH region can repolarize but still generate a single PVC [Fig. 3(e)]. When bH is too small, both the bH and bL regions repolarize normally [Fig. 3(f)]. The bifurcations leading to these states are detailed below.
When bH is large enough (> 5.9211), there exist three steady states, as shown in Fig. 4(a), which can be solved numerically using the method aforementioned in Sec.II (or Appendix A). They are labeled as F (the green solid dots), S (the red empty dots below F), and Z (the blue solid dots in the bottom). Z is the trivial homogeneous zero solution (the resting state). As for F and S, the linear stability analyses reveal that F is a focus, either stable or unstable depending on the parameters, and S is a saddle-focus (see Appendix A for the calculated eigenvalues). Figure 4(b) shows the real parts of the largest eigenvalue of the F-associated Jacobian matrix λF (a complex number) and its complex conjugate vs bH. As bH is reduced, Re(λF) crosses zero to become positive [the critical point is labeled as ”HB” in Fig. 4(b)], indicating that the F solution undergoes a Hopf bifurcation. This instability originates from the gradient region bordering the bH and bL regions [see Fig. 3(c) for the action potential and Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) for the bifurcation diagrams]. Although oscillations occur, these oscillations cannot propagate out the middle region to form PVCs [see Fig. 4(d), u(1) is quiescent despite of oscillatory u(90)]. The oscillations propagate into PVCs when bH is smaller than a critical value [labeled as ”Exc” in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d)] at which the amplitude of the limit cycle oscillation is large enough [see Fig. 3(d)]. As bH is decreased further, transient excitations occur [see Fig. 3(e)], labeled as ”TrE” in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d). This transient zone [colored gray in Fig. 3(a)] is very narrow. When bH becomes too small (= 5.9211), F and S annihilate via a saddle-node bifurcation, which is labeled as ”SN” in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d). The plots of steady-state F and S solutions just before annihilation are shown by the olive and pink curves (denoted by ”F S collide”), respectively, in Fig. 4(a). After this bifurcation, the spatially heterogeneous steady states F and S no longer exist in the cable. Therefore, for bH < 5.9211 all the cells are allowed to repolarize, and no gradient effect could be seen.
FIG. 4.

Bifurcations leading to spontaneous excitations. bL = 1.5 and γ = 1. (a) Plots of the spatially heterogeneous steady-state solutions. The example of bH = 20 are shown. There are three solutions, i.e., F (a focus, green solid dots), S (a saddle-focus, red open dots), and Z (zero, blue solid dots). If bH is reduced to 5.9211, F and S would collide with each other, represented by the olive and pink dots. (b) The largest (referring to the real part) eigenvalues of the F-associated Jacobian matrix vs bH. ”HB” denotes the Hopf bifurcation point. (c) Bifurcation diagram plotting u vs bH for the 90th cell [denoted by u(90)]. The maximum and minimum u values of the stationary oscillations are recorded (the first 100,000 steps are discarded). ”HB”, ”Exc”, ”TrE” and ”SN” correspond to Hopf bifurcation, stationary excitation, transient excitation, and saddle-node bifurcation, respectively. (d) The same as (c), but for the 1st cell [denoted by u(1)].
We carry out simulations in a heterogeneous 1D cable using a more physiologically detailed model, the 1991 Luo and Rudy (LR1) model [29], and the results are presented in Fig. 11 in Appendix D. The excitation behaviors are almost the same as those obtained using the FHN model.
FIG. 11.

Excitation dynamics in a heterogeneous 1D cable using the LR1 model. Gsi = 0.2mS/cm2. (a) The dynamical behaviors on the 1/GK,L−1/GK,H plane. α(τX) = 10. The colors are the same as for Fig. 3(a). The space-time plots of voltage for the parameter values marked on the grey dashed vertical line are shown in panels (c)–(f). (b) The dynamical behaviors on the 1/GK,L − α(τX) plane. GK,H = 0.01mS/cm2. The colors are the same as for Fig. 5(a). The space-time plots for the parameters marked by the circles are shown in panels (g) and (h). (b) (1/GK,L,1/GK,H) = (0.2,50). (c) (1/GK,L,1/GK,H) = (0.2,15). (d) (1/GK,L,1/GK,H) = (0.2,9). (e) (1/GK,L,1/GK,H) = (0.2,6). (f) The space-time plot of voltage of multiple solutions, similar to Fig. 5(d). GK,H = 0.01mS/cm2, GK,L = 0.4mS/cm2, α(τX) = 1.7. (g) Bistable states of F and oscillatory excitations, similar to Fig. 5(h). GK,H = 0.01mS/cm2, GK,L = 0.37mS/cm2, α(τX) = 1.1.
IV. COMPLEX EXCITATION DYNAMICS
Although γ does not vary the steady solutions, it affects the stability of the steady-state solutions and causes complex behaviors. Figure 5(a) shows the dynamics in the bL-γ plane. The upper light gray region is propagation failure, i.e., local excitations can never propagate out as an excitable wave in the cable. For the rest of this plane, one can divide it into three ranges based on the specific behaviors, i.e., small, intermediate, and large bL, which are detailed below.
FIG. 5.

Complex bifurcations and dynamics. bH = 20 unless specified. (a) The bL-γ phase plane. Based on the specific behaviors, the plane is divided into three regions, denoted as small, intermediate, and large bL (separated by the vertical dash-dot lines). Green, yellow, and red correspond to the same behaviors as in Fig. 3(a). Light gray, violet, and olive represents propagation failure, S-associated oscillations, and stable steady-state F′, respectively. The left black dashed curve is the Hopf bifurcation line of F, while the right blue one is that of F′ obtained via bifurcation analyses. (b) The bifurcation diagram showing u(90) vs γ for small bL (bL < 1.65). bL = 1.5. The black solid dots are oscillations arising from the instability of the steady-state F solution, while the violet ones are oscillations arising from the instability of the steady-state S solution. (c) The blowup of (b) for γ ϵ (0.4,0.42) showing the details of the F- and S-associated oscillations. At γ = 0.4073, the largest Lyapunov exponent of the F-chaos state is 6.13 (calculated by the method from [30]). (d) The space-time plot of u(x,t) switching from the S-associated excitation state to the F-associated chaotic excitation state after a perturbation. γ = 0.4073. The propagated excitations (or PVCs) are indicated by the red ”*”. (e) The solution structure vs bL. γ = 1. The steady-state u value of the 1st cell is shown. When bL = 4.94, new steady-state solutions F′ and S′ are born via a saddle-node bifurcation, as indicated by ”SN1”. Increase of bL stabilizes F′ via an inverse Hopf bifurcation, as indicated by ”HB”. The inset shows the steady-state solutions for bL = 5.2. At bL = 5.9211 F and S′ annihilate via a saddle-node bifurcation, labeled as ”SN2”. (f) The largest (referring to the real part) eigenvalues of the F′-associated Jacobian matrix vs γ. ”HB” denotes the Hopf bifurcation point. (g) The bifurcation diagram showing u(90) vs γ for bL = 5.2. The red circles close to the olive F′ branch are due to the small oscillations between successive PVCs, as shown in panel (h). (h) The space-time plot showing switching from the stable F′ state to oscillatory excitation states after a perturbation. bL = 5.2, γ = 1.3.
For very small bL, i.e., bL < 1.1, the F steady-state solution is permanently stable for any bL and γ. For bL between 1.1 and 1.65, varying γ can result in complex behaviors, such as quasi-periodicity, chaos, and multi-attractor. A bifurcation diagram is shown in Fig. 5(b). As γ decreases, the system evolves continuously following the sequence of dynamics: stable focus→limit cycle→quasi-periodicity→chaos [see the black dots in Fig. 5(b) and the blowup in Fig. 5(c)]. These behaviors all bifurcate from the steady-state F solution. An interesting finding is that another attractor showing oscillatory excitations suddenly emerges at γ = 0.4168, which coexists with the F-associated oscillations. We use violet in Figs. 5(a)–5(c) to denote this state. This type of excitation is associated with the S solution due to its saddle-focus property. Since F- and S-associated attractors coexist, a proper perturbation could switch the state between them, as shown in Fig. 5(d). With the reduction of γ the two attractors would approach each other and finally collide to give rise to robust excitations (see Appendix B for the estimation of the distance between them).
For intermediate bL, the bifurcation to excitation is identical to that of varying bH as introduced in Fig. 3, i.e., Hopf bifurcation gives rise to a limit cycle, and once its amplitude is large enough spontaneous PVCs could be elicited.
For large bL, multi-stability exists due to newly born steady-state solutions. Besides F, S, and Z, new steady-state solutions are born via a saddle-node bifurcation. All the spatially heterogeneous steady-state solutions are shown in the inset of Fig. 5(e), where the newly-born solutions are named as F′ and S′. We choose the steady state of the 1st cell [u*(1)] vs bL to show the change of the solution structure in Fig. 5(e), revealing a saddle-node bifurcation. For large bL, the F solution is always unstable [denoted by green open dots in Fig. 5(e)], whereas the stability of F′ depends on the parameters. The largest (referring to the real part) eigenvalues of F′, i.e., λ(F′) and c.c., vs γ is shown in Fig. 5(f). It reveals that F′ loses its stability via a Hopf bifurcation. This Hopf bifurcation is subcritical as shown in Fig. 5(g). Due to the subcritical property, there is a bistable region in which the stable steady-state F′ solution and oscillations coexist. A space-time plot of u(x,t) is shown in Fig.5(h). If bL is further increased to 5.9211, the excitable part also becomes bistable. At this point, solutions F and S′ collide with each other and annihilate via a saddle-node bifurcation [labeled SN2 in Fig. 5(e)]. For bL > 5.9211, only F′, S and Z exist. In this case, F′ is just the steady state that connects the upper fixed point of both bH and bL parts of the tissue.
In the more physiologically detailed model (LR1 [29]), by altering the maximum conductance and the time constant of the time-dependent potassium current, we can reproduce the same complex behaviors (compare Fig. 3 and Fig. 5 with Fig. 11 in Appendix D). The similarity indicates that the bifurcation mechanisms leading to PVC using the FHN model can be extended to ventricular tissue.
V. EFFECTS OF CABLE LENGTH
The dynamical behaviors also depend on the cable length as well as the lengths of the two heterogeneous regions. Figure 6 shows the dependence of the dynamics on the cable length. NH = 50 and NL = 100 are the control lengths of the two regions. As shown in Fig. 6(a), as long as the cable is long enough, the dynamical behaviors are size independent. However, when either NH or NL is short, the dynamical behaviors become length-dependent [e.g., the bifurcation point for NL = 15 is different from those for longer cables, Fig. 6(a)]. Figures 6(b) and 6(c) show the effects of NH and NL. Figure 6(b) reveals that NH has little effect on the dynamics until NH is too small at which F and S annihilate via a saddle-node bifurcation (indicated by the white dotted line). Figure 6(c) shows that the bifurcations depend on NL in a greater degree. For NL ≤ 12 F′ solution no longer exists, and only F solution presents. Under this condition, as bL is increased from small to large, the steady-state F solution would undergo a Hopf bifurcation twice between which oscillatory excitations present. For 8 < NL ≤ 12 the Hopf bifurcation of F (indicated by the upper black dashed line) is subcritical, whereas for NL ≤ 8 it becomes supercritical. We show the two bifurcations in Appendix C. Figure 6(d) shows the dependence on the total length. NL = 2NH is kept. It presents a mixed effect of NH and NL. We can see that oscillations as well as PVCs could never occur in a short cable (N ≤ 18). Therefore, the spontaneous PVCs or oscillations need a minimal length, indicating that these dynamics are a result of instabilities in a spatial system.
FIG. 6.

The effects of the cable length. bH = 20 unless specified. (a) Dependence of the bifurcations on the cable length. Shown are the Hopf bifurcation points of F (left) and F′(right) on the bL-γ plane for different cable lengths labeled as NL + NH. (b) The effect of NH. NL = 100 is fixed. The white vertical dotted line indicates the annihilation of F and S. (c) The effect of NL. NH = 50 is fixed. Green is for stable F, while olive for stable F′. (d) The dependence on total length N = NH + NL. NL = 2NH is kept. If NL ≤ 18 the system stays stably on either F (green) or homogeneous resting state (blue), and thus neither oscillations nor PVCs can occur.
VI. ROLE OF SPATIAL GRADIENT OF REPOLARIZATION
In a real biological system, the parameter change may not be so abrupt as we used above. Therefore, we investigate the effect of the spatial gradient of the parameter in this section. We set a gradient-adjustable region within the cable [Fig. 7(a)] in which b increases linearly from bL to bH within Ng points, and thus the slope (bH −bL)/Ng denotes the spatial gradient of b. We explore the behaviors in the bL − Ng plane, as shown in Fig. 7(b). Increasing either bL or Ng promotes the Hopf bifurcation of the steady-state F solution. But Ng has little effect on the stability of the steady-state F′ solution. This indicates that reducing the gradient of b promotes oscillations, which agrees with the observation that reducing bH promotes oscillations [Fig. 3(a)].
FIG. 7.

The effects of the spatial gradient of parameter b. bH = 20 and γ = 1. (a) The configuration of the setting. The total length and the bH region length are fixed to be N = 150 and NH = 50, respectively. Parameter b increases linearly from bL to bH within Ng cells. (b) Dynamical behaviors in the bL − Ng plane. The lower black dashed curve indicates the Hopf bifurcation of the F solution obtained via stability analyses, and the upper blue dashed line is that of the F′ solution.
VII. SUMMARY
In the present paper we investigate the bifurcations leading to spontaneous excitations in an inhomogeneous FHN cable. The mechanistic insights from the bifurcation analyses may help to understand the mechanisms for the genesis of PVCs and arrhythmias in LQTS. Our major findings are as follows:
The mechanism of oscillatory excitation is via a Hopfbifurcation in a spatial system. The oscillations occur when bH (the source) and bL (the sink) are properly matched. The instability occurs in the gradient region via a supercritical Hopf bifurcation, first resulting in small amplitude oscillations in the gradient region but no propagating PVCs. As the oscillation amplitude grows to a certain value, the oscillations propagate out the gradient region to form PVCs.
More complex behaviors may occur depending on bL and γ. Chaotic dynamics and multiple attractors occur for small bL and γ, where excitations arise from instability of the steady-state S solution. On the other hand, large bL gives rise to additional steady-state solutions (i.e., F′ and S′) via saddle-node bifurcation. The bifurcation of F′ is a subcritical Hopf bifurcation.
The dynamics is also affected by the tissue size. NH (the length of the source) maintains the repolarization gradient but has little effect on the dynamics, while NL (the length of the sink) influences the stability of the system. A minimum size is needed for the instability and spontaneous PVCs.
The spatial gradient of repolarization affects thestability of the F solution. Reducing the gradient promotes instability and spontaneous PVCs.
Note that in this simple FHN model, we can only have repolarization failure which mimics ultra-long APD and repolarization failure in the cardiac system. As shown in our simulations, although the FHN model fails to repolarize when uncoupled, it can repolarize normally when coupled in tisse, and can result in one or more PVCs, or sustained oscillations. Furthermore as shown in many simulation and experimental studies [31–37], early after-depolarizations (EADs) are a hallmark of LQTS, which cannot be modeled by the simple FHN model. Simulation studies have shown two mechanisms of PVC genesis [19, 38]: an EAD-mediated one and an APD gradient mediated one. The EAD-mediated one occurs when the APD gradient is small, but the APD gradient mediated one is promoted by large APD gradient. However, in the later one, whether EADs are present or not, the APD gradient is responsible primarily for the instabilities for PVC genesis. Therefore, although the FHN model cannot exhibit EADs, instabilities caused by the repolarization gradient can still provide valuable mechanistic insights into the genesis of PVCs for LQTS, which need to be further investigated in more physiologically detailed models.
In conclusion, our results reveal that the spontaneous excitations that give rise to PVCs are a result of instabilities of a heterogeneous spatial system. The mechanistic insights from bifurcation analyses of the simple FHN model will provide a nonlinear dynamics foundation for the analysis of the genesis of PVCs in more realistic cardiac tissue models of LQTS.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work is supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2021A1515010500).
Appendix A: Derivation and properties of the inhomogeneous steady states
We employ linear stability analysis to investigate the dynamical behaviors of the cable model. For stability analyses, we need to numerically obtain the steady-state solutions. The discretized version of Eq.(1) is
where f(u, v) = [u(1 − u)(u - a) − v]/ϵ, g(u, v) = γ[u − b(x)v], and no-flux boundary condition is used. Setting dui/dt = dvi/dt = 0 (i = 1,2...N), we obtain a set of algebra equations. We use the method shown in Fig. 8 to numerically solve all the steady-state solutions.
FIG. 8.

The workflow for numerically solving the inhomogeneous steady-state solutions. Starting with a proper u1 and solving the equations in sequence, one can finally get uN. Substituting this uN into the last equation would yield u′N. If uN = u′N the solution is self-consistent, and the acquired u1, v1, u2, v2... uN, vN is the desired steady-state solution. If not, change another u1 and repeat the process. By finely scanning u1 (set the increment δ to be very small) we can numerically solve all the solutions.
After obtaining the steady-state solutions, we substitute them into the associated Jacobian matrix and calculate the eigenvalues numerically. Here we show the eigenvalues of F, F′, S and S′ for bH = 20 and γ=1 (bL = 1.5 for F and S, and 5.4 for F′ and S′) to reveal their nature (only part of the spectrum is shown, and the largest ones are red bolded):
![]() |
![]() |
As the parameters are changed, F and F′ undergo Hopf bifurcation [as shown in Figs.4(b) and 5(f)], while S and S′ retain their saddle-focus properties.
Appendix B: Estimation of distance between F- and S-associated attractors
In section IV, we show that there are coexisting F-and S-associated attractors for small bL. With the reduction of γ they approach each other and finally merge to form robust PVCs. The approaching of the attractors could be indicated by the distance between them, which is estimated in the following way. In the multi-attractor parameter range, if we perturb all u simultaneously at a certain time, i.e., u(x,t) = u(x,t) + δu(t), the system would switch between the attractors. The minimum δu(t) enabling the switch could roughly estimate the distance between the attractors. Figure 9 shows that the minimum δu(t) on γ = 0.4073 is very close to 0 on certain time moments, much less than that of a little bit larger γ. This means that as γ is reduced, the distance between the attractors is reduced.
FIG. 9.

Estimation of the distance between the F- and S-associated attractor for bL = 1.5, bH = 20. The minimum δu(t) enabling the switch from the F-associated attractor to the S-associated attractor are shown. The black dots are for γ = 0.4073 and the red ones for γ = 0.416.
Appendix C: Bifurcation types altered by NL
In Sec. V, we find that the length of the bL region (NL) can alter the bifurcation type when it is small. Here we show more details about this by showing the bifurcation diagram plotting u vs bL, as shown in Fig. 10. For NL = 10 [Fig. 10(a)], there exists a range where stable F and oscillatory excitation can be both stably present, which is a typical characteristic of subcritical Hopf bifurcation. For NL = 6 [Fig. 10(b)], the situation is different, a supercritical Hopf bifurcation occurs.
FIG. 10.

Bifurcation types altered by NL. (a) NL = 10. Subcritical Hopf bifurcation. (b) NL = 6. Supercritical Hopf bifurcation occurs.
Appendix D: Similar results using the LR1 model
In order to extend the FHN results to more realistic cardiac model, we employ a more detailed physiology model, i.e., LR1 model [29], to study the PVC behaviors. This model describes the AP of guinea pig ventricular myocytes, and has been widely used to invesitgate fundamental mechanisms of arrhythmias. The setting of the 1D cable is similar to the one with the FHN model, and the heterogeneity is modeled by changing GK (the maximum potassium current conductance) as follows [15, 38], i.e.,
We also alter the maximum conduace (Gsi) of the slow inward current and the time constant of X gate (using α(τX) as the multiplied factor). The other parameters are set as their default values in the original model (see [29]).
We investigated the behaviors in the 1/GK,L−1/GK,H and 1/GK,L − α(τX) plane, see Figs. 11(a) and 11(b). The pictures are similar to Figs. 3(a) and 5(a). This further indicates that parameter b corresponds to the conductance of potassium current, and γ plays a similar role of repolarizing kinetics. But note that the multi-attractor ranges are much narrower in LR1. Figures 11(c)–(f) are space-time plots of voltage from different regions in Fig. 11(a), showing almost the same behaviors as in Fig. 3. Figures 11(g) and 11(h) show complex excitation behaviors of LR1, where the multiple solutions and F-associated PVCs present, similar to the ones shown in Fig. 5. These complex behaviors occur at large 1/GK,H, meaning that the potassium current is small.
References
- [1].Zipes DP and Wellens HJ, Circulation 98, 2334 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Qu Z and Weiss JN, Annu. Rev. Physiol 77, 29 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Winfree AT, Sci. Am 248, 144, 152, 160 (1983). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Karma A, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 4, 313 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- [5].Qu Z, Hu G, Garfinkel A, and Weiss J, Phys. Rep 543, 61 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Chou T-C and Wenzke F, Am. Heart J 96, 191 (1978). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Chiladakis JA, Karapanos G, Davlouros P, Aggelopoulos G, Alexopoulos D, and Manolis AS, Am. J. Cardiol 85, 289 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Engel TR, Meister SG, and Frankl WS,.
- [9].Lerma C, Lee CF, Glass L, and Goldberger AL, J. Electrocardiol 40, 78 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Liu MB, Vandersickel N, Panfilov AV, and Qu Z, Circ. Arrhythm. Electrophysiol 12, e007571 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Qu Z, Liu MB, Olcese R, Karagueuzian H, Garfinkel A, Chen P-S, and Weiss JN, Heart Rhythm 19, 1369 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Drew BJ, Ackerman MJ, Funk M, Gibler WB, Kligfield P, Menon V, Philippides GJ, Roden DM, and W Z, Circulation 121, 1047 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Morita H, Wu J, and Zipes DP, The Lancet 372, 750 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Badri M, Patel A, Patel C, Liu G, Goldstein M, Robinson VM, Xue X, Yang L, Kowey PR, and Yan G-X, JACC Clin. Electrophysiol 1, 315 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Huang X, Kim TY, Koren G, Choi B-R, and Qu Z, Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol 311, H1470 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Liu W, Kim TY, Huang X, Liu MB, Koren G, Choi B-R, and Qu Z, J. Physiol 596, 1341 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Teplenin AS, Dierckx H, de Vries AAF, Pijnappels DA, and Panfilov AV, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021077 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Vandersickel N, de Boer TP, Vos MA, and Panfilov AV, J. Physiol 594, 6865 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Zhang Z, Liu MB, Huang X, Song Z, and Qu Z, Biophys. J 120, 352 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Heitmann S, Shpak A, Vandenberg JI, and Hill AP, PLOS Computational Biology 17, e1008683 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].FitzHugh R, Biophys. J 1, 445 (1961). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Nagumo J, Arimoto S, and Yoshizawa S, Proc. IRE 50, 2061 (1962). [Google Scholar]
- [23].Puisieux FL, Adamantidis MM, Dumotier BM, and Dupuis BA, British Journal of Pharmacology 117, 1377 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Undrovinas IA, Maltsev AV, and Sabbah NH, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 55, 494 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Antzelevitch C, Eur. Heart J 3, K2 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Orth PMR, Hesketh JC, Mak CKH, Yang Y, Lin S, Beatch GN, Ezrin AM, and Fedida D, Cardiovasc. Res 70, 486 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Kettlewell S, Saxena P, Dempster J, Colman MA, Myles RC, Smith GL, and Workman AJ, J. Physiol 597, 3619 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Qu Z and Chung D, PLOS one 7, e43587 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Luo CH and Rudy Y, Circ. Res 68, 1501 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Bennetin G, Galgani L, Giorgilli A, and Strelcyn J-M, Meccanica 15, 21 (1980). [Google Scholar]
- [31].Qu Z, Xie L-H, Olcese R, Karagueuzian HS, Chen P-S, Garfinkel A, and Weiss JN, Cardiovasc. Res 99, 106 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].January CT, Riddle JM, and Salata JJ, Circ. Res 62, 563 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].El-Sherif N, Craelius W, Boutjdir M, and Gough WB, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 1, 145 (1990). [Google Scholar]
- [34].Yan G-X, Wu Y, Liu T, Wang J, Marinchak RA, and Kowey PR, Circulation 103, 2851 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Tran DX, Sato D, Yochelis A, Weiss JN, Garfinkel A, and Qu Z, Phys. Rev. Lett 102, 258103 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Vandersickel N, Kazbanov IV, Nuitermans A, Weise LD, Pandit R, and Panfilov AV, PLOS one 9, e84595 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Huang X, Song Z, and Qu Z, PLOS Computational Biology 14, e1006382 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Zhang Z and Qu Z, Phys. Rev. E 103, 062406 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


