Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Case Reports logoLink to Journal of Medical Case Reports
. 2023 Oct 18;17:434. doi: 10.1186/s13256-023-04160-0

Colonic medullary carcinoma: an exceedingly rare type of colorectal malignancy: a case report and review of the literature

Fajer Al-Ishaq 1, Mahmood Al-Dhaheri 1,, Ali Toffaha 1, Salwa Awad 1, Syed Rizvi 2, Mohamed AbuNada 1, Mohamed Kurer 1
PMCID: PMC10583308  PMID: 37849007

Abstract

Background

Medullary carcinoma of the colon is a rare subtype of colorectal cancer that has a unique, and sometimes varied, clinical and histologic profile. It usually presents in adult patients older than 50 years. Here, we report a unique case of young male patient who initially presented with abdominal pain followed by a large bowel obstruction.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old SriLankan male presented with right-sided abdominal pain and on examination, there was a palpable right iliac fossa mass. Colonoscopy and a computed tomography scan revealed cecal mass. Later, while waiting for elective resection, the patient developed symptoms and signs of a large bowel obstruction. He underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with an uneventful postoperative course. The histopathologic evaluation of the resected specimens showed invasive carcinoma with syncytial growth pattern, foci of lymphoid host response, and dirty necrosis, in keeping with a medullary carcinoma pT4a pN2b. Unlike most reported medullary carcinoma cases, this patient was young and caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 positive.

Conclusion

We have reported another case of medullary carcinoma of the colon in a young patient with unique histologic characteristics. Reporting such cases helps in refine understanding of the histologic and genetic, as well as clinical, phenotypes of medullary carcinoma of the colon.

Keywords: Colon cancer, Medullary carcinoma, Microsatellite instability, Immunohistochemistry

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer globally and the second most common cause of cancer related mortality, as per the World Health Organization (WHO) factsheet (accessed 6 July 2023). The majority (around 98%) of CRCs are adenocarcinomas [1]. An exceedingly rare (0.29%) subtype is medullary [2] first described in 1999 by Jessurun [3]. Characterized initially by histologically distinct features (undifferentiated high-grade cytology, syncytial growth pattern, and prominent lymphocytic infiltration) followed by correlation with a unique molecular profile (more frequent association with microsatellite instability), it has recently been described to be more common in older individuals and females, with a better outcome when compared with poorly differentiated (usual type) adenocarcinoma [2, 4]. However, due to its rarity, prognostic data are limited and further cases with follow-up are needed to learn more about this rare subtype of adenocarcinoma. There is an increasing interest in the topic recently among clinicians and researchers, with more case reports describing the clinical and pathological features of medullary adenocarcinomas of the colon, in addition to the potential diagnostic and therapeutic approaches [5]. A recent study [7] identified overexpression of key immunoregulatory genes and features that may explain the prognostic difference from usual adenocarcinoma and provide potential therapeutic targets. In this study, we report an unusual case of medullary adenocarcinoma of the colon with some unique characteristics and summarize the reported cases in the literature.

Case report

A 40-year-old male SriLankan presented with a 1 month history of right-sided abdominal pain, loss of appetite, weight loss, and melena, with no family history of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. On physical examination, there was a palpable mass in the right iliac fossa (RIF) associated with tenderness.

Investigations highlighted hypochromic microcytic anemia [hemoglobin (Hgb) 7.4 mg/dL, hematocrit (Hct) 26%, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) 67 mg/dL, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) 19.5 mg/dL]. Tumor markers were normal. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis showed a mass with irregular eccentric soft tissue density involving the cecum and proximal ascending colon measuring 65 × 35 × 31 mm with multiple enlarged regional lymph nodes (Fig. 1). Colonoscopy showed a cecal ulcero-proliferative circumferential lesion with a malignant appearance (Fig. 2). No metastases were seen on the staging CT scan. The patient was scheduled for an elective laparoscopic right hemicolectomy; however, before his date of surgery, he presented to the emergency with an acute obstruction and was taken for emergency surgery. He underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with side-to-side ileocolic anastomosis. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the seventh postoperative day.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Computerized scan: mass with irregular eccentric soft tissue density involving the cecum and proximal ascending colon measuring 65 × 35 × 31 mm with multiple enlarged regional lymph nodes

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Colonoscopy: cecal, ulcero-proliferative circumferential lesion with a malignant appearance

The histopathology evaluation of the resected specimens showed invasive carcinoma with syncytial growth pattern, foci of lymphoid host response, and dirty necrosis, in keeping with a medullary carcinoma. The tumor was present in subserosal fat (pT4a) and show metastatic carcinoma in 13 (out of 22) lymph nodes (pN2b). There was prominent lympho-vascular invasion. The margins were clear (R0) (Fig. 3). Immunohistochemical stains for mismatch repair (MMR) status showed loss of nuclear expression of both MSH2 and MSH6 with intact expression of MLH1 and PMS2 (Fig. 4). The most commonly reported loss is that of MLH1. The tumor cells expressed CK20 and SATB2 in keeping with a colorectal primary. Unlike most reported medullary carcinoma cases and like usual large bowel cancers, caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) was positive. Despite areas with morphological resemblance to endocrine tumor, common neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56) were negative.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Medullary carcinoma showing prominent lymphoid infiltrate (a, b), necrosis characteristic of tumors with microsatellite instability (c, d), syncytial growth pattern with some features that resemble neuroendocrine tumors (e), lymphovascular invasion (f), and lymph node metastasis (g)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Mismatch repair status evaluation using immunohistochemical biomarkers. Loss of MSH2 (MutS homolog 2) and MSH6 (MutS homolog 6) with retained MLH1(MutL homolog 1) and PMS2 (postmeiotic segregation increased 2), confirming microsatellite instability

Discussion

Medullary carcinoma (MC), a relatively recently identified, extremely rare type of adenocarcinoma (with incidence reported to range from approximately 0.3% to 3%) [2, 6, 7] is characterized by a poorly differentiated carcinoma with a syncytial growth pattern, and with areas that resemble endocrine tumors but lack neuroendocrine marker expression and show a dense lymphoid host response and extensive lymphovascular invasion. So-called dirty necrosis, suggestive of microsatellite instability is also seen, with all tumors showing mismatch repair protein abnormalities. Therefore, these are best classified as a subtype of microsatellite instable carcinoma and may be sporadic or syndromic (Muir–Torre syndrome). Recently, these tumors have been shown to overexpress immunoregulatory genes [8] that, along with dense lymphoid host response, may possibly account for better overall survival when compared with ‘usual’ poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Colarossi et al. [9] highlighted immunohistochemical loss of expression of ARID1A along with a higher incidence of BRAF (V600E) mutation. Like other MSI tumors, the mutational burden of these tumors is low. This coupled with overexpression of immunoregulatory genes seems to confer a better prognosis in medullary carcinoma compared with usual-type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and may provide unique therapeutic targets. Therefore, correct identification and workup is essential. Especially given that the diagnosis of MC is challenging and can be confused with the diagnosis of other histological subtypes of colon MC, which necessitate a comprehensive pathological examination, in addition to immunohistochemical staining, to confirm the diagnosis of medullary adenocarcinoma of the colon [8, 10].

Table 1 summarizes the key findings in recently published cases of medullary colon cancer based on a review of recent literature on the subject. Around ten cases were found in which the MMR status, the immunohistochemical analysis of the disease, the staging, and the location of the tumor were discussed.

Table 1.

The reported cases in the literature

Author Year No. of cases Gender Age Presentation Location of the tumor Differentiation/stage Biomarker testing Immunohistochemical analysis
Sharma et al. [11] 2012 1 Female 74 Abdominal pain (LLQ), fatigue, intermittent diarrhea, and weight loss (15 lbs in 2 months) Right-sided tumor; ascending colon Undifferentiated Microsatellite instability Negative CDX-2, CK20, CK7, TTF-1, S-100 protein, MART1, PAX-8, chromogranin, synaptophysin, estrogen receptors, and hepatocyte-specific antigen
Jain et al. [12] 2014 1 Female 72

Bleeding per rectum

Abdominal cramps and loose stool

Left-sided tumor

Poorly differentiated

G3 T2N0M0

Microsatellite instability

Positive staining for MSH2 and MSH6

Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 protein expression

Cunningham et al. [13] 2014 2 Female 79 Weakness, abdominal pain (RLQ), anorexia, and loss of 11 kg over 1 year Left-sided tumor; splenic flexure

Poorly differentiated

G4 T3N1M1

Microsatellite instability

Positive: CDX-2, rare positive CK7

Negative: CK20, synaptophysin, and chromogranin

KRAS wild type and loss of mismatch repair proteins (MLH1 and PMS2)

81 Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and weight loss Left-sided tumor; splenic flexure + distal transverse colon

Poorly differentiated

G2 T4N0M0

Loss of mismatch repair proteins (MLH1 and PMS2)
Bağ et al. [14] 2017 1 Male 72 Abdominal pain and bleeding per rectum Transverse colon

Moderately differentiated

G2 T2N0M0

Microsatellite instability

Negative: CK20, synaptophysin negative, chromogranin, CDX2, CD56, CEAmono, calretinin

Positive: p53 (20% positive+), E-cadherin, cyclin D1 (5% nuclearexpression), CD44 (80%), KI-67 (80%), and p16

Martinotti et al. [15] 2017 1 Female 44 Acute abdominal pain Right-sided tumor; cecum and ascending colon

Poorly differentiated

Stage 3 T3N0M0

Microsatellite instability

Positive: CK7 (focal), CAM 5.2 (focal), CKAE1/AE3 (focal), calretinin (focal), claudin 4

Negative: CK20, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CDX2, TTF-1, P63, CK5-6, CD20, CD3, CD5, CD79, MUM1, S100, ER, MART-1, EBV

Fatima et al. [16] 2021 1 Female 77 Lower abdominal pain, distention, vomiting, and weight loss (10 lbs) Right-sided tumor; cecum Poorly differentiated Microsatellite instability

Positive: CKAE1/AE3, GATA3, calretinin, p63, and CDX2

Negative: CK7, CK20, and SATB2

Loss of PMS2 expression with intact MSH6 expression

Colarossi et al. [9] 2021 2 Male 70 Diffuse abdominal pain and weakness Right-sided tumor; cecum and ascending colon G2 T3N0M0 Microsatellite instability

Positive: calretinin and membranous beta-catenin

Negative: CK20, CDX2, chromogranin, and synaptophysin

Loss of MLH1, PMS, and loss of ARID1A

62 Diffuse abdominal pain and nausea Right-sided tumor; ileocecal G2 T3N0M0

Positive: calretinin

Negative: CDX2, CK20 and ARID1A

Loss of MLH1 and PMS2

KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF were wild type

Chen et al. [17] 2021 1 Female 68 NA Right-sided tumor; ascending colon NA Microsatellite instability

Positive: p40 and CK5/6, but negative CDX2, CK20, and SATB2

MMR deficient with loss of MLH1 and PMS2

NGS confirmed BRAF V600E mutation

Saikia [18] 2023 1 Female 77 Lower GI bleeding Right-sided tumor; cecum

Undifferentiated

G2 T3N0M0

Microsatellite instability

Positive: CDX2

Negative: CK7, CK20 synaptophysin and chromogranin, GATA 3, and PAX8

Loss of MLH1 and PMS2

LLQ Left Lower Quadrant, RLQ Right Lower Quadrant, CDX-2 caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2, CK20 Cytokeratin 20, CK7 Cytokeratin 7, TTF-1 Thyroid transcription factor, MART1 Melanoma-associated antigen recognized by T cells, PAX-8 Paired-box gene 8, MSH2 MutS Homolog 2, MSH6 MutS homolog 6, MLH1 MutL homolog 1, PMS2 postmeiotic segregation increased 2, KRAS Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, CD56 cluster of differentiation 56, CEAmono carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody, P53 protein 53, CD44 cluster of differentiation 44, Ki-67 Marker Of Proliferation Ki-67, p16 protein 16, CAM 5.2 Anti-Cytokeratin, CK AE1/AE3 Cytokeratin AE1 / AE3, p63 protein 63, CK5-6 Cytokeratin 5-6, CD20 cluster of differentiation 20, CD3 cluster of differentiation 3, CD5 cluster of differentiation 5, CD79 cluster of differentiation 79, MUM1 multiple myeloma oncogene 1, ER Estrogen receptor, EBV Epstein-Barr virus, GATA3 GATA-binding protein 3, SATB2 SATB Homeobox 2, ARID1A AT-Rich Interaction Domain 1A, NRAS Neuroblastoma rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog, BRAF V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B, SATB2 Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2, MMR Mismatch repair, NGS Next generation sequencing

Our patient was a young gentleman diagnosed with cecal adenocarcinoma and regional lymph node involvement. He had an aggressive disease that led to an obstruction that necessitated an urgent surgical resection. Unlike our patient, most cases of colon MC are in older patients, typically over 60 years old (as presented in Table 1), and predominantly in females [3]. Moreover, almost all patients who were diagnosed with colon MC presented with abdominal pain or bleeding per rectum (Table 1) rather than an obstruction.

The histopathological study of the mass showed invasive MC with features resembling neuroendocrine tumors and with only focal areas with dense lymphoid infiltrate. Like most reported cases, there was prominent lymphovascular invasion and a lack of neuroendocrine biomarkers, along with loss of MMR by immunostaining, indicating microsatellite instability. Unlike most reported cases, the tumor cells expressed CDX2 and instead of MLH1 loss, highlighted retained MLH1 and loss of both MSH2 and MSH6. BRAF was not mutated (Table 1). Hence, this case showed that MC can present with different morphological and immunohistochemical patterns and that there are variations in the ‘usual’ molecular signature. Therefore, this expands the diagnostic spectrum of MC and highlights the diagnostic challenges in the absence of an established clinical, molecular, and histopathological pattern for this type of cancer. Reporting rare cases such as colon MC helps clinicians and pathologists with the diagnosis and management of such rare conditions, and can aid in identifying the characteristic of the subtypes of colon cancer and improve our understanding of such rare entities.

Conclusions

Medullary adenocarcinoma of the colon is an exceptionally rare subtype of colorectal cancer, with increasing knowledge about the morphology, immunophenotype and molecular profile. Recent advances in immunohistochemistry and molecular studies played a role in improving the understanding of this subtype. Still, further reports are needed for better understanding of such rare entity. It is therefore imperative that we report cases with comprehensive pathology workup, relevant clinical findings, and follow-up, to add to our understanding of this rare disease.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

FA-I: writing—review and editing, writing—original draft. MA-D: conceptualization, writing—review and editing. AT: writing—review and editing. SA: writing—review and editing. SR: writing the pathology part and supplying the pathology slides. MAN: conceptualization, writing—review and editing. MK: conceptualization, writing—review and editing.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library.

Data availability

Data are available upon request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No institutional review board is needed as there is no direct patient intervention.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

The original online version of this article was revised: an error was identified in the Funding section which incorrectly stated there was no funding.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

11/1/2023

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1186/s13256-023-04228-x

References

  • 1.Ottaiano A, Santorsola M, Perri F, Pace U, Marra B, Correra M, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of rare malignant tumors of colon and rectum. Biology. 2022;11(2):267. doi: 10.3390/biology11020267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jabbal IS, Nagarajan A, Rivera C, et al. Medullary carcinoma of the colon: a comprehensive analysis of the national cancer database. Surg Oncol. 2022;45:101856. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jessurun J, Romero-Guadarrama M, Manivel JC. Medullary adenocarcinoma of the colon: clinicopathologic study of 11 cases. Hum Pathol. 1999;30(7):843–848. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(99)90146-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Knox RD, Luey N, Sioson L, et al. Medullary colorectal carcinoma revisited: a clinical and pathological study of 102 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(9):2988–2996. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4355-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Blakely AM, Nelson RA, Hamilton SA, Lai LL. Sidedness determines clinical characteristics and survival outcomes in medullary adenocarcinoma of the colon. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20481. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99848-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fleming M, Ravula S, Tatishchev SF, Wang HL. Colorectal carcinoma: pathologic aspects. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2012;3(3):153–173. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pyo JS, Sohn JH, Kang G. Medullary carcinoma in the colorectum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Pathol. 2016;53:91–96. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Friedman K, Brodsky A, Lu S, et al. Medullary carcinoma of the colon: a distinct morphology reveals a distinctive immunoregulatory microenvironment. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:528–541. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Colarossi C, Mare M, La Greca G, De Zuanni M, Colarossi L, Aiello E, et al. Medullary carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract: report on two cases with immunohistochemical and molecular features. Diagnostics. 2021;11(10):1775. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rao Bommi J, Kummari S, Lakavath K, Sukumaran RA, Panicker LR, Marty JL, et al. Recent trends in biosensing and diagnostic methods for novel cancer biomarkers. Biosensors. 2023;13(3):398. doi: 10.3390/bios13030398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sharma A, Sharma N, Pantangi P, Sampath P. Medullary adenocarcinoma of colon: distinct entity with a favorable prognosis: 1409. Off J Am Coll Gastroenterol. 2012;107:S561. doi: 10.14309/00000434-201210001-01409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jain S, Jain A, Onizuka N, Boukhar SA. A rare case of medullary carcinoma of the colon presenting as intussusception in an adult with rectal bleeding. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2014;73(11):348–352. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cunningham J, Kantekure K, Saif MW. Medullary carcinoma of the colon: a case series and review of the literature. In Vivo. 2014;28(3):311–314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bağ HK, Kar H, Cin N, Avcı A, Peker Y, Durak E. Colonic medullary carcinoma: a rare case. Istanb Med J. 2017;18(4):251–254. doi: 10.5152/imj.2017.80269. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Martinotti M, Cirillo F, Ungari M, Tanzi G, Rolando G, Tarasconi A, et al. Microsatellite instability in medullary carcinoma of the colon. Rare Tumors. 2017;9(1):6541. doi: 10.4081/rt.2017.6541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fatima Z, Sharma P, Youssef B, Krishnan K. Medullary carcinoma of the colon: a histopathologic challenge. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e15831. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen IY, Findeis-Hosey JJ, Cannon L, Liao X. Primary colonic medullary carcinoma with exclusive squamous differentiation. Anticancer Res. 2021;41(7):3567–3572. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saikia K. Medullary carcinoma of colon: pathologists dilemma. J Cancer Sci Res. 2023;8(2):532. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request.


Articles from Journal of Medical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES