Skip to main content
Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome logoLink to Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome
. 2023 Sep 30;32(3):183–196. doi: 10.7570/jomes23053

COVID-19, Obesity, and GRP78: Unraveling the Pathological Link

Jihoon Shin 1,2,3,*, Iichiro Shimomura 1
PMCID: PMC10583770  PMID: 37752707

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, driven by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to an unprecedented global surge in infections and fatalities. Notably, obesity has emerged as an important susceptibility factor for COVID-19; however, the pathological mechanisms for this remain poorly understood. Recent studies proposed a role for glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), a protein implicated in both obesity and metabolic syndrome, which may function as a binding partner and/or co-receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Given its crucial involvement in diverse biological processes, GRP78 likely plays a major role in multiple facets of the viral life cycle and the pathology of COVID-19. This perspective review discusses the potential contributions of GRP78 to the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathology, particularly in the context of obesity. The primary objective is to facilitate a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Through this exploration, we aim to illuminate the complex interactions underpinning the nexus of COVID-19, obesity, and GRP78, ultimately paving the way for informed therapeutic strategies and preventive measures.

Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Obesity, GRP78

INTRODUCTION

Since its discovery in December 2019 in Wuhan City, China, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has swiftly propagated worldwide, resulting in over 769 million cases and 6.9 million deaths.1,2 The symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) span a spectrum ranging from asymptomatic to critical, encompassing manifestations like fever, cough, breath shortness, fatigue, muscle pain, diarrhea, dizziness, and loss of smell and taste. In severe cases, COVID-19 can lead to pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, and multiple organ failure, contributing critically to mortality.1,2 Among the diverse factors influencing susceptibility to severe forms of COVID-19 such as older age, metabolic disorders, and some types of cancers, obesity has emerged as a major risk determinant.3-9 However, the pathological mechanisms underlying this association have remained elusive.

SARS-CoV-2, like all viruses, relies on the host environment for survival and utilizes host cell surface proteins for the infection.10,11 While angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has been acknowledged as the primary host receptor for SARS-CoV-2, the low expression level and limited cell distribution of ACE2 have prompted inquiries into the involvement of other host factors.12 In this pursuit, glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) has emerged as a novel host factor. GRP78 (heat shock protein family A [Hsp70] member 5 [HSPA5]; binding immunoglobulin protein [BiP]) is a molecular chaperone, maintaining the protein homeostasis within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). However, cumulative studies have unveiled new functional facets of GRP78 by identifying its presence on the cell surface.13,14 This expanded its role beyond the ER to participation in diverse biological processes such as cellular signaling, inflammatory responses, cell death (apoptosis), and even viral infections.13,14

Recent findings, independently reported by our team and another research group, highlight GRP78 as a host binding partner and/or co-receptor for SARS-CoV-2 infection.12,15 Given the multifaceted roles of GRP78 spanning the ER, cell surface, and circulation,13,14,16-19 it is conceivable that GRP78’s influence extends across various stages of the virus’s life cycle and the intricacies of SARS-CoV-2 pathology. Moreover, the expression of GRP78 has significant associations with COVID-19 risk factors, including older age, obesity, diabetes, and some types of cancer.12,20-22 Consequently, gaining insights into GRP78’s roles from diverse viewpoints promises a better comprehension of COVID-19’s disease processes, while also introducing innovative perspectives for potential therapeutic interventions.

Through this review, we endeavor to not only enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of COVID-19, particularly in relation to obesity, but also to unravel the pathological roles of GRP78 in the context of COVID-19 to pave the way for novel therapeutic interventions and strategies that could prevent the current and future pandemics.

OBESITY AND COVID-19

Obesity is a complex medical condition characterized by the accumulation of excess body fat. It is not merely a cosmetic concern but a significant health issue with far-reaching effects on various body systems and an increased risk for several diseases. The number of obese people has nearly tripled since 1975 worldwide and is still increasing (Fig. 1);23,24 39% of adults were estimated as overweight (body mass index [BMI] ≥25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2) and 13% were obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2) globally in a 2016 report. Trends are more prominent in Western countries;23 40% of adults have obesity and another 32% are overweight in the United States;25 29% of adults have obesity and a further 36% are overweight in England.26 Obesity is recognized as a major risk factor for COVID-19 and contributes significantly to various pathological outcomes, such as hospitalization, severity, and mortality.27,28

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has resulted in an unparalleled global upsurge in infections and fatalities. Notably, obesity has emerged as an important susceptibility factor for COVID-19, with its prevalence continuing to rise substantially on a global scale. However, the underlying pathological mechanisms remain incompletely elucidated. Recent research suggests that glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), a protein widely associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome, may play a pivotal role as both a binding partner and co-receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Given its pivotal involvement in a range of biological processes, GRP78 likely assumes a multifaceted role in the viral lifecycle. In addition to its functions as a binding partner and co-receptor, GRP78 also operates as a viral chaperone, cellular signaling mediator, and protein stabilizer. These diverse roles may contribute to the various pathologies observed in COVID-19, encompassing not only infection dynamics but also aspects such as inflammation, fibrosis, organ tropism, long COVID syndrome, co/secondary infections, and metabolic abnormalities.

Obesity can adversely affect the respiratory system and systemic immune response, all of which play crucial roles in the progression of COVID-19.29 Individuals with obesity often exhibit impaired lung function and reduced lung capacity, which are associated with their ability to effectively combat respiratory infections.30 Moreover, obesity can lead to a state of chronic low-grade inflammation, characterized by elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines.31 This chronic inflammation can impact the body’s immune defense mechanisms, making it more difficult for the immune system to mount a robust response against viral infections. Furthermore, obesity is often associated with underlying health conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular and kidney diseases, which also increase the risk of severe COVID-19.32

In addition to these pathological aspects, host factors could affect the higher susceptibility of individuals with obesity to COVID-19. ACE2 and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) are two key proteins involved in the entry of the SARS-CoV-2 virus into host cells.33 ACE2 serves as the receptor that the virus uses to bind and enter host cells, while TMPRSS2 facilitates the priming of the virus spike protein, allowing it to fuse with the cell membrane and enter the cell.33 In the context of obesity, there is evidence to suggest that the expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 may be altered,34-37 potentially influencing the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19. Some studies have suggested that the expression of ACE2 may be upregulated in individuals with obesity.34-37 This upregulation could create more entry points for the virus, potentially increasing the viral load and severity of infection. The relationship between ACE2, TMPRSS2, obesity, and COVID-19 is complex and not fully understood. Further clinical studies are needed to establish a clear link between these host factors, obesity, and COVID-19 outcomes.

The relationship between COVID-19 and obesity is multifaceted. The impact of obesity on lung function, inflammation, immune response, underlying health conditions, and host factors collectively contribute to the increased risk of severe illness in COVID-19. Understanding and addressing the molecular basis is crucial for developing effective strategies to protect vulnerable populations and mitigate the impact of COVID-19.

CELL SURFACE GRP78: A CO-RECEPTOR FOR SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION

Although ACE2 has been recognized as the primary receptor for SARS-CoV-2, its low expression and confined cell distribution suggest the possibility of other host factors that might augment the interaction between the virus and its host. Recent studies have suggested that GRP78 functions as a host binding partner and/or co-receptor for SARS-CoV-2 infection.12,15 GRP78, a molecular chaperone within the ER, assumes a pivotal role in regulating protein homeostasis such as protein folding, assembly, stability, and degradation.13,14 However, under stress, GRP78 becomes overexpressed and translocated to the cell surface, acting as a binding partner for diverse ligands and influencing the pathology of various conditions like infections and cancers.13,14

The cellular localization of GRP78 is associated with intrinsic and extrinsic elements.38-40 GRP78 features an N-terminal signal peptide, guiding its ER localization during translation.38 The C-terminal KDEL sequence interacts with the KDEL receptor, governing retrograde transport from Golgi to the ER.39 Stress-induced GRP78 overexpression disrupts ER retention, leading to KDEL receptor saturation and GRP78 relocation to the cell surface.41-43 Cellular stress such as viral infection also increases the GRP78 expression and relocation from the ER to cell surface and circulation,15,44,45 which possibly affects the pathology and lifecycle of SARS-CoV-2.

Cell surface GRP78 (csGRP78) exhibits binding affinity for endogenous and exogenous ligands, including viral proteins.13,14 Recent studies have established csGRP78 as a binding partner and/or co-receptor with ACE2 for SARS-CoV-2 infection.12,15 While csGRP78 alone does not promote SARS-CoV-2 binding, its co-expression with ACE2 enhances viral protein accumulation on cell surfaces.12 Mechanistically, csGRP78 directly interacts with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and forms a protein complex with host cell receptor ACE2 on the cell surface, which facilitates entry into the target cells;12,15 the host factor efficacy of csGRP78 for SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with the stabilization of ACE2 protein expression on the cell surface.15 This co-receptor role mirrors its involvement in other coronaviruses and viruses such as dengue virus, coxsackievirus A9, Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), and Tembusu virus.19,45-51

In summary, cell surface-localized GRP78 assumes significance as a co-receptor or binding partner in SARS-CoV-2 infection, mediating direct interactions between spike protein and ACE2 (Figs. 1 and 2). In addition to that, GRP78 can control the protein homeostasis of membrane proteins, such as ACE2, potentially enhancing the stability and presence of ACE2 on the cell surface.12-15 GRP78’s binding affinities for both endogenous ACE2 and viral proteins probably contribute to the increased entry of SARS-CoV-2 into target cells on the cell surface.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) plays a multifaceted role as a host factor that affects various stages of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) life cycle. It functions as a co-receptor, chaperone, protein stabilizer, and intermediary in cellular signaling and transcription processes. On the cell surface, GRP78 binds to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, triggering endocytosis and facilitating viral entry. Within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), GRP78 assists in replicating and assembling viral proteins. It may also play a role in the exocytosis/egress of the virus and contribute to its overall stability, supporting a successful viral life cycle. Moreover, the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and cell surface GRP78 could potentially activate cellular signaling pathways associated with inflammation and fibrosis. These pathways, in turn, may lead to the tissue and organ damage observed in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; ERGIC, ER–Golgi intermediate compartment.

GRP78: A VIRAL PROTEIN CHAPERONE FOR SARS-CoV-2

Since viruses cannot self-replicate, they need to exploit host cells to produce their proteins.11,19,52-54 SARS-CoV-2 is a type of coronavirus enclosed within a lipid membrane, with numerous viral proteins forming its structure.54-56 These proteins encompass four essential ones: spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N); an additional 16 non-structural proteins (NSP1-16), derived from open reading frame 1a (ORF1a) and ORF1ab; and 11 accessory proteins: ORF3a, ORF3b, ORF3c, ORF3d, ORF6, ORF7a, ORF7b, ORF8, ORF9b, ORF9c, and ORF10. These components are critical for the viral life cycle and infection, though how they are produced and replicated remains largely unknown.

The ER is a hub for the production, folding and assembly of membrane and secretary proteins.13-15 GRP78, as a molecular chaperone in the ER, plays a critical role in regulating protein folding, assembly, and homeostasis not just for host cell proteins but also for external viral proteins.13-16 Many viruses, including dengue virus, JEV, human cytomegalovirus, Ebola virus, and hepatitis B virus, rely on GRP78 to assemble their viral proteins.48,50,57-60 The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 directly interacts with GRP78 in host cells.12,15 Ablation of GRP78 decreases the production of viral protein and SARS-CoV-2 replication.18,45,61

The cumulative protein interactome data have shown that GRP78 also interacts with other viral proteins of SARS-CoV-2, such as E, N, NSP2, NSP4, NSP14, ORF7a, and ORF8.62 The S, E, and N proteins are indispensable elements for the virus’s structure and infectivity;55,56 NSP2, NSP4, and NSP14 form a replication-transcription complex that actively participates in genome replication and the regulation of early transcription processes;56 ORF7a plays a role in suppressing the type I interferon response, amplifying immune and cytokine reactions, and contributing to SARS-CoV-2’s replication.63-65 Additionally, ORF8 is intricately connected to the evasion of the immune system and the elicitation of inflammatory responses in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection.66-68

Taken together, GRP78, acting as a host chaperone for viral SARS-CoV-2 proteins, assists in the proper folding, assembly, and maturation of viral components like S, E, N, NSPs, and ORFs, contributing to the pathology of COVID-19 (Figs. 1 and 2). The diverse range of protein binding capabilities exhibited by GRP78 can be advantageous for viruses. This suggests that viruses may have evolved to use GRP78 as a viral chaperone, aiding in viral replication.

THE ROLE OF SOLUBLE GRP78 IN COVID-19

GRP78 is present not only within cellular compartments such as the ER and cell surface but also in circulation in a soluble form.20,21,44,69 Notably, the level of soluble GRP78 increases with SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in patients with pneumonia.44 This circulating GRP78 has strong links to metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes.69 Similar elevation of GRP78 is also observed in patients with lung cancers.20,22 These pathological conditions are recognized contributors to the severity and mortality risk of COVID-19.6,70

In our recent study, we treated ACE2-expressing human lung epithelial cells with soluble GRP78—mimicking circulating GRP78 in vitro—which resulted in facilitated binding and accumulation of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the cells. These results suggested that the soluble form of GRP78 in circulation possibly binds to SARS-CoV-2 via the interaction with spike protein on the viral membrane, enhances its stability, and facilitates the infection into host cells.12 Previous research indicates that GRP78 enhances the stability and expression of binding proteins; for instance, csGRP78 stabilizes ACE2 or ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (ADMA17) protein on the cell surface, influencing virus infectivity.15,71 Additionally, GRP78 promotes the entry of binding substances into cells through the endocytosis pathway.72,73

It is plausible that soluble GRP78 might directly bind to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in circulation (Figs. 1 and 2). This complex formation of soluble GRP78 with viral particles could enhance virus stability and facilitate attachment and endocytosis in target cells. These properties might contribute to SARS-CoV-2’s ability to infect multiple organs beyond the respiratory tract, potentially leading to conditions like ‘long COVID’ characterized by prolonged symptoms after infection.74-80 Further experimental and clinical studies are required to validate these hypotheses.

CELL SURFACE GRP78: A SIGNALING MEDIATOR IN COVID-19

GRP78 has traditionally been recognized as a chaperone protein that maintains protein balance and manages stress within the ER. However, accumulating research demonstrates its broader role as a signaling mediator on the cell surface, impacting various disease-related processes like inflammation, cell death, survival, and cell growth.13,81-84 This signaling role of csGRP78 is facilitated by its interactions with other cell membrane proteins and molecules, which in turn trigger diverse cellular responses and gene activities.

For instance, when csGRP78 interacts with α2-macroglobulin, it triggers signaling pathways involving mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), protein kinase B (AKT), and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) that promote cell proliferation while decreasing cell death.81,85 This interaction also regulates other pathways, such as pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1) signaling and cellular MYC (c-MYC) activity, linked to cell growth.86 Furthermore, csGRP78’s involvement in controlling transcriptional coactivators Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), which are crucial for cell mechanics and movement, influences the mobility of cancer cells.83 Moreover, the complex formation of GRP78 with Cripto on the cell surface impacts various cellular processes by activating specific pathways such as MAPK/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and SMAD2/3, influencing cell adhesion and growth while also activating the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway linked to cell survival.82,87 These cellular responses associated with csGRP78’s interactions are key contributors to the development of various diseases.

Notably, well-known pathways like NF-κB and JAK/STAT3 are associated with inflammatory and apoptotic responses, while SMAD2/3 pathways are established in fibrosis formation (Figs. 1 and 2).13,81,82 Additionally, the PI3K/AKT/MAPK and YAP/TAZ pathways are essential for cell survival and growth.13,82-84 The activation of csGRP78, either through direct binding with SARS-CoV-2 or related signals, has the potential to modify these signaling and transcriptional pathways, affecting the development of COVID-19 pathology. Further experiments are necessary to fully comprehend how csGRP78 influences cell signaling and gene activity during SARS-CoV-2 infection and its contribution to COVID-19 pathological development, including inflammation, cytokine storms, cell death, and tissue damage.

GRP78 AND COVID-19 VULNERABILITY

Not everyone infected with SARS-CoV-2 experiences severe symptoms, but certain groups are more susceptible to developing serious outcomes. Cumulative studies have found that individuals with older age, obesity, diabetes, lung cancer, and other metabolic abnormalities are more vulnerable to COVID-19.3-7

Recently, we have demonstrated that GRP78 expression is prominent in adipose tissues, particularly within the visceral regions.12 This expression is further heightened under conditions of older age, obesity, and diabetes. The elevated expression of GRP78 in adipocytes is attributed to hyperinsulinemia, a characteristic often observed in older age, obesity, and diabetes.12 Of note, the expression of GRP78 in adipocytes remained unaffected by glucose levels, underscoring that the primary driver of GRP78 overexpression in adipose tissue is hyperinsulinemia.12 Mechanistically, hyperinsulinemia in obesity triggers cellular stress and activates the stress-responsive transcription factor the spliced form of X-box binding protein 1 (XBP-1s), resulting in the overexpression of both the gene and protein expression of GRP78 in adipocytes.12 Notably, in human adipose tissue, there is a significant correlation between the gene expression levels of XBP-1 and GRP78,12 thus confirming the regulatory mechanism underlying this process.

The circulating level of GRP78 is also significantly correlated with obesity, diabetes, and other metabolic syndromes.21,69 Moreover, specific types of lung cancer are linked to the overexpression of GRP78, with its circulating levels showing a marked increase in concurrence with disease progression and severity.20,22 The soluble GRP78 in circulation could possibly facilitate the stability and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells.12 Collectively, underlying health conditions, such as older age, obesity, diabetes, and specific cancer types, potentially cultivate environments that stimulate the induction and activation of GRP78 across cellular, extracellular, and circulatory contexts (Fig. 1). As a result, individuals with such conditions might be more susceptible to the impact of COVID-19.

METABOLIC IMPACTS OF GRP78 IN COVID-19

In recent years, it has become apparent that SARS-CoV-2 infection can have harmful effects far beyond the lungs; COVID-19 is well known for causing respiratory disease but can also trigger metabolic abnormalities.70,77 However, the molecular mechanisms remain largely elusive. SARS-CoV-2 infection elevates the expression of GRP78 in the lung and circulation,44,88 and presumably in other infected organs and cells, such as liver, adipose tissue, pancreatic, and immune cells via cellular stress and unfolded protein responses (UPRs).77

The pathological significance of GRP78 overexpression in metabolic diseases has been well established in numerous prior studies (Table 1). The expression of GRP78 is significantly increased in the adipose tissue of patients with obesity and diabetes.12 The circulating level of GRP78 serves as a molecular marker for several metabolic diseases, encompassing obesity, diabetes, and atherosclerosis.21,69 Heterozygosity of the Grp78 gene increases energy expenditure and offers protection against hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, liver steatosis, and adipose inflammation induced by a high-fat diet through adaptive UPR mechanisms.89 Macrophage-selective ablation of the Grp78 gene enhances insulin sensitivity and improves glucose metabolism in muscle, while simultaneously reducing inflammation in adipose tissue.90 Furthermore, covalent inhibition of GRP78 using celastrol curbs lipid accumulation in the liver and adipose tissue, concurrently mitigating ER stress and inflammation.91 The overexpression of Vaspin, an endogenous antagonist for the csGRP78 and DnaJ-like protein 1 (MTJ-1) complex, ameliorates diet-induced obesity, glucose intolerance, and hepatic steatosis while enhancing ER stress.92

Table 1.

Short summary of GRP78’s metabolic impacts

Mouse model Metabolic phenotype
Grp78 heterozygous knockout89 Protection against hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, liver steatosis, and adipose inflammation under HFD
Macrophage-specific Grp78 knockout mice90 Improved glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity in muscle and reduced inflammation in adipose tissue under HFD
Covalent inhibition of GRP78 by celastrol91 Reduction in body weight and fat mass and improvement in glucose and insulin tolerances under HFD
GRP78 antagonism by Vaspin overexpression92 Protection against diet-induced obesity, glucose intolerance, and hepatic steatosis

GRP78, glucose-regulated protein 78; HFD, high-fat diet.

Collectively, these studies have suggested that the expression of GRP78 induced by infection and stress could potentially contribute to the metabolic abnormalities associated with COVID-19 (Fig. 1). The molecular mechanisms underlying metabolic disorders following SARS-CoV-2 infection remain largely unexplored. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct detailed investigations into this relationship in future studies.

ADDITIONAL PATHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF GRP78 IN COVID-19

There are various other pathological dimensions of GRP78 associated with the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 and the progression of COVID-19 symptoms. GRP78 is overexpressed when the ER faces stress conditions, such as an overwhelming burden of protein synthesis.13,14 This induction of GRP78, coupled with the UPR, not only prevents cell apoptosis but also fosters pro-survival mechanisms within the cells.13,14,16 Additionally, elevated levels of GRP78 are detected in various viral infections.16,57,60 Importantly, the upregulation of GRP78 is also evident in instances of SARS-CoV-2 infection, possibly linked to ER stress induced by the excessive synthesis of viral proteins; elevated levels of GRP78 have been identified in pneumocytes, macrophages, and within the circulating system.44,88 Collectively, these findings suggest its potential involvement in the prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2, resulting in an extended and sustained duration of the virus within the host.

The expression of GRP78 plays a crucial role in influencing apoptotic, immune, and fibrotic responses within the lung.93,94 Mice with Grp78 heterozygosity (Grp78+/−) have shown remarkable protection against bleomycin-induced fibrosis, accompanied by improved lung function.93 Furthermore, the deactivation of GRP78 has been linked to reduced endothelial inflammation and enhanced barrier integrity in the context of acute lung injury,94 suggesting its potential implication in the lung pathology and function of individuals affected by COVID-19. Further comprehensive research is needed on the relationship between GRP78 and lung pathology, encompassing aspects such as cell death, immune responses, and fibrotic reactions in COVID-19.

GRP78 plays a pivotal role in stabilizing ADAM17 on the cell surface, a function that has been reported to enhance the activity of the previous coronavirus strain, SARS-CoV, by facilitating the shedding of the viral receptor ACE2.71 Moreover, GRP78 likely participates in the regulation of ACE2 protein expression on the cell surface, potentially through direct binding and stabilization mechanisms.15 Following infection, GRP78 is released alongside replicated SARS-CoV-2 viruses from host cells through the lysosomal exocytic pathway, hinting at its involvement in virus replication, egress, and stabilization processes.17 Additionally, GRP78 can interact with major histocompatibility class one molecules on the cell surface,95 suggesting a potential contribution to antigen presentation and subsequent immune responses during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

GRP78: A HOST FACTOR FOR BACTERIAL AND FUNGAL INTERACTIONS

Co-infections and secondary bacterial or fungal infections have been reported in COVID-19 patients, exacerbating the severity of the disease and leading to worse outcomes.96-98 Intriguingly, GRP78 exhibits remarkable conservation across different organisms, ranging from bacteria (Dna K: bacterial GRP78 homolog) to humans (GRP78/BiP/HSPA5).99 Bacterial GRP78 plays an essential role in promoting proper bacterial growth and mRNA/protein regulation.100 It has become a therapeutic target for addressing both bacterial and viral infections.101

Importantly, viable SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in fecal specimens from COVID-19 patients,102,103 and the virus demonstrates bacteriophage-like behavior by replicating within bacteria.104 Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 infection disrupts gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota and is linked to the severity of COVID-19.105 These observations indicate a potential interplay between GRP78 and SARS-CoV-2, which might contribute to virus replication/transmission via GI/fecal bacteria, perturb the microbiota, and potentially influence the outcome of COVID-19.

Furthermore, GRP78 functions as a host receptor for fungal pathogens such as Rhizopus oryzae, a common species within the Mucorales order, facilitating invasion and damage to human endothelial cells.106 GRP78 also interacts with Pneumocystis carinii on the surface of lung epithelial cells, facilitating attachment.107 These discoveries suggest that GRP78 could play a role in scenarios involving co-infections and secondary infections among COVID-19 patients, contributing to the outcome of COVID-19 pathology (Fig. 1).

TARGETING GRP78: THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES FOR COVID-19

Given the pivotal role of GRP78 in diverse biological processes, its interaction with SARS-CoV-2 proteins, and its link to COVID-19-associated pathological risks, a strategic focus on modulating either the activity or expression of GRP78 is a promising therapeutic and preventative avenue. This approach holds the potential to effectively mitigate various stages of the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle, encompassing binding, entry, replication, egress, and stability. Encouragingly, evidence from studies indicates that neutralizing csGRP78 with specific antibodies can curtail the infectivity of related viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.15,16,19,47 Similarly, the targeted suppression of GRP78 expression using small interfering RNA not only impedes virus entry but also attenuates the production of viral proteins within host cells.16,19,45,50,51 Other inhibitory molecules related to the expression and/or activity of GRP78, such as subtilase cytotoxin (SubAB), AR12 (direct GRP78 inhibitor), HA15 (potent GRP78 inhibitor; OSU-03012), and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), have shown analogous potential by inhibiting virus entry and replication processes within host cells.16,18,45,48,50

Strategies that mitigate metabolic stress, whether through pharmacological interventions or lifestyle changes, offer an avenue to curtail GRP78 expression. Notably, anti-diabetic medications like metformin and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, as well as lifestyle modifications such as calorie restriction and exercise, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing GRP78 expression in adipose tissues.12 Managing metabolic abnormalities via diabetic drugs may also hold the potential to ameliorate the severity of COVID-19 outcomes.12,108,109 Collectively, directing interventions toward GRP78 under conditions of stress holds potential as a promising therapeutic strategy to prevent or inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection and the progression of COVID-19 pathology.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, GRP78 appears to play a versatile role as a host factor influencing multiple stages of the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle. It acts as a co-receptor, chaperone, protein stabilizer, and mediator of cellular signaling and transcription (Figs. 1 and 2). These emerging functions of GRP78 likely contribute to various aspects of COVID-19 pathology, encompassing not only infection but also inflammation, fibrosis, egress, organ tropism, long-term COVID symptoms, co-infections, secondary infections, and metabolic disorders. Its expression is notably linked to a heightened risk of severe symptoms and outcomes in COVID-19 patients, particularly among the elderly, obese, diabetic, and those with lung cancer. Consequently, targeting GRP78 could prove effective as both a preventive and therapeutic approach against COVID-19-related pathology. This review aims to stimulate further research on GRP78 across both the clinical and basic science domains. In-depth investigations are warranted to fully comprehend GRP78’s potential roles and its associations with COVID-19 pathology, risk factors, and metabolic implications.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank all the members of the Department of Metabolic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Study concept and design: JS; drafting of the manuscript: JS and IS; and critical revision of the manuscript: IS.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Velavan TP, Meyer CG. The COVID-19 epidemic. Trop Med Int Health. 2020;25:278–80. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102433. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stefan N, Birkenfeld AL, Schulze MB, Ludwig DS. Obesity and impaired metabolic health in patients with COVID-19. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16:341–2. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-0364-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Watanabe M, Caruso D, Tuccinardi D, Risi R, Zerunian M, Polici M, et al. Visceral fat shows the strongest association with the need of intensive care in patients with COVID-19. Metabolism. 2020;111:154319. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Luo J, Rizvi H, Preeshagul IR, Egger JV, Hoyos D, Bandlamudi C, et al. COVID-19 in patients with lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1386–96. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reiterer M, Rajan M, Gómez-Banoy N, Lau JD, Gomez-Escobar LG, Ma L, et al. Hyperglycemia in acute COVID-19 is characterized by insulin resistance and adipose tissue infectivity by SARS-CoV-2. Cell Metab. 2021;33:2484. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thoppil JJ, Stewart LK, Pung L, Nordenholz KE, Camargo CA, Courtney DM, et al. Increased body mass index and metabolic syndrome are associated with poor outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-positive emergency department patients. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2022;31:245–53. doi: 10.7570/jomes22011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Collins WJ, Chang AY, Weng Y, Dahlen A, O'Brien CG, Hom J, et al. Association between obesity and length of COVID-19 hospitalization: unexpected insights from the American Heart Association National COVID-19 Registry. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2022;31:277–81. doi: 10.7570/jomes22042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shang J, Wan Y, Luo C, Ye G, Geng Q, Auerbach A, et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117:11727–34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003138117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shin J, Toyoda S, Nishitani S, Fukuhara A, Kita S, Otsuki M, et al. Possible involvement of adipose tissue in patients with older age, obesity, and diabetes with SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) via GRP78 (BIP/HSPA5): significance of hyperinsulinemia management in COVID-19. Diabetes. 2021;70:2745–55. doi: 10.2337/db20-1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gopal U, Pizzo SV. Cell surface GRP78 signaling: an emerging role as a transcriptional modulator in cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236:2352–63. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee AS. The ER chaperone and signaling regulator GRP78/BiP as a monitor of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Methods. 2005;35:373–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2004.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carlos AJ, Ha DP, Yeh DW, Van Krieken R, Tseng CC, Zhang P, et al. The chaperone GRP78 is a host auxiliary factor for SARS-CoV-2 and GRP78 depleting antibody blocks viral entry and infection. J Biol Chem. 2021;296:100759. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ha DP, Van Krieken R, Carlos AJ, Lee AS. The stress-inducible molecular chaperone GRP78 as potential therapeutic target for coronavirus infection. J Infect. 2020;81:452–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ghosh S, Dellibovi-Ragheb TA, Kerviel A, Pak E, Qiu Q, Fisher M, et al. β-Coronaviruses use lysosomes for egress instead of the biosynthetic secretory pathway. Cell. 2020;183:1520–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rayner JO, Roberts RA, Kim J, Poklepovic A, Roberts JL, Booth L, et al. AR12 (OSU-03012) suppresses GRP78 expression and inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;182:114227. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chu H, Chan CM, Zhang X, Wang Y, Yuan S, Zhou J, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus and bat coronavirus HKU9 both can utilize GRP78 for attachment onto host cells. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:11709–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang F, Li X, Zhao N, Duan L, Chen Y. Circulating GRP78 acts as a biomarker in the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11:5223–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nourbakhsh M, Sharifi R, Heydari N, Nourbakhsh M, Ezzati-Mobasser S, Zarrinnahad H. Circulating TRB3 and GRP78 levels in type 2 diabetes patients: crosstalk between glucose homeostasis and endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Endocrinol Invest. 2022;45:649–55. doi: 10.1007/s40618-021-01683-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang Q, He Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang T, Tong S, et al. Overexpression of endoplasmic reticulum molecular chaperone GRP94 and GRP78 in human lung cancer tissues and its significance. Cancer Detect Prev. 2005;29:544–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.World Health Organization, author. Obesity and overweight [Internet] WHO; 2021. [cited 2023 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight . [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang YS, Han BD, Han K, Jung JH, Son JW Taskforce Team of the Obesity Fact Sheet of the Korean Society for the Study of Obesity, author. Obesity fact sheet in Korea, 2021: trends in obesity prevalence and obesity-related comorbidity incidence stratified by age from 2009 to 2019. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2022;202131:169–77. doi: 10.7570/jomes22024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of overweight, obesity, and severe obesity among children and adolescents aged 2-19 years: United States, 1963-1965 through 2015-2016 [Internet] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018. [cited 2023 Sep 23]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/obesity_child_15_16/obesity_child_15_16.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Baker C. Obesity statistics. House of Commons Library; 2023. [cited 2023 Sep 23]. Available from: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn03336 . [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Palaiodimos L, Kokkinidis DG, Li W, Karamanis D, Ognibene J, Arora S, et al. Severe obesity, increasing age and male sex are independently associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, and higher in-hospital mortality, in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 in the Bronx, New York. Metabolism. 2020;108:154262. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huang Y, Lu Y, Huang YM, Wang M, Ling W, Sui Y, et al. Obesity in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism. 2020;113:154378. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kwok S, Adam S, Ho JH, Iqbal Z, Turkington P, Razvi S, et al. Obesity: a critical risk factor in the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Obes. 2020;10:e12403. doi: 10.1111/cob.12403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mafort TT, Rufino R, Costa CH, Lopes AJ. Obesity: systemic and pulmonary complications, biochemical abnormalities, and impairment of lung function. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2016;11:28. doi: 10.1186/s40248-016-0066-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Calder PC, Ahluwalia N, Brouns F, Buetler T, Clement K, Cunningham K, et al. Dietary factors and low-grade inflammation in relation to overweight and obesity. Br J Nutr. 2011;106 Suppl 3:S5–78. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511005460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sanchis-Gomar F, Lavie CJ, Mehra MR, Henry BM, Lippi G. Obesity and outcomes in COVID-19: when an epidemic and pandemic collide. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95:1445–53. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jackson CB, Farzan M, Chen B, Choe H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23:3–20. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00418-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Al Heialy S, Hachim MY, Senok A, Gaudet M, Abou Tayoun A, Hamoudi R, et al. Regulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in obesity: implications for COVID-19. Front Physiol. 2020;11:555039. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.555039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Radzikowska U, Ding M, Tan G, Zhakparov D, Peng Y, Wawrzyniak P, et al. Distribution of ACE2, CD147, CD26, and other SARS-CoV-2 associated molecules in tissues and immune cells in health and in asthma, COPD, obesity, hypertension, and COVID-19 risk factors. Allergy. 2020;75:2829–45. doi: 10.1111/all.14429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sarver DC, Wong GW. Obesity alters Ace2 and Tmprss2 expression in lung, trachea, and esophagus in a sex-dependent manner: implications for COVID-19. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;538:92–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Higham A, Singh D. Increased ACE2 expression in bronchial epithelium of COPD patients who are overweight. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2020;28:1586–9. doi: 10.1002/oby.22907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Martoglio B, Dobberstein B. Signal sequences: more than just greasy peptides. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:410–5. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(98)01360-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Munro S, Pelham HR. A C-terminal signal prevents secretion of luminal ER proteins. Cell. 1987;48:899–907. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90086-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tsai YL, Zhang Y, Tseng CC, Stanciauskas R, Pinaud F, Lee AS. Characterization and mechanism of stress-induced translocation of 78-kilodalton glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) to the cell surface. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:8049–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.618736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wiersma VR, Michalak M, Abdullah TM, Bremer E, Eggleton P. Mechanisms of translocation of ER chaperones to the cell surface and immunomodulatory roles in cancer and autoimmunity. Front Oncol. 2015;5:7. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Van Krieken R, Tsai YL, Carlos AJ, Ha DP, Lee AS. ER residential chaperone GRP78 unconventionally relocalizes to the cell surface via endosomal transport. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:5179–95. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03849-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gonzalez-Gronow M, Gopal U, Austin RC, Pizzo SV. Glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) is an important cell surface receptor for viral invasion, cancers, and neurological disorders. IUBMB Life. 2021;73:843–54. doi: 10.1002/iub.2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sabirli R, Koseler A, Goren T, Turkcuer I, Kurt O. High GRP78 levels in COVID-19 infection: a case-control study. Life Sci. 2021;265:118781. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shin WJ, Ha DP, Machida K, Lee AS. The stress-inducible ER chaperone GRP78/BiP is upregulated during SARS-CoV-2 infection and acts as a pro-viral protein. Nat Commun. 2022;13:6551. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34065-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cabrera-Hernandez A, Thepparit C, Suksanpaisan L, Smith DR. Dengue virus entry into liver (HepG2) cells is independent of hsp90 and hsp70. J Med Virol. 2007;79:386–92. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Triantafilou K, Fradelizi D, Wilson K, Triantafilou M. GRP78, a coreceptor for coxsackievirus A9, interacts with major histocompatibility complex class I molecules which mediate virus internalization. J Virol. 2002;76:633–43. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.2.633-643.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nain M, Mukherjee S, Karmakar SP, Paton AW, Paton JC, Abdin MZ, et al. GRP78 is an important host factor for Japanese encephalitis virus entry and replication in mammalian cells. J Virol. 2017;91:e02274–16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02274-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhao D, Liu Q, Han K, Wang H, Yang J, Bi K, et al. Identification of glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) as a receptor in BHK-21 cells for duck Tembusu virus infection. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:694. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Reid SP, Shurtleff AC, Costantino JA, Tritsch SR, Retterer C, Spurgers KB, et al. HSPA5 is an essential host factor for Ebola virus infection. Antiviral Res. 2014;109:171–4. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Alhoot MA, Wang SM, Sekaran SD. RNA interference mediated inhibition of dengue virus multiplication and entry in HepG2 cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chan CP, Siu KL, Chin KT, Yuen KY, Zheng B, Jin DY. Modulation of the unfolded protein response by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J Virol. 2006;80:9279–87. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00659-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Booth L, Roberts JL, Ecroyd H, Tritsch SR, Bavari S, Reid SP, et al. AR-12 inhibits multiple chaperones concomitant with stimulating autophagosome formation collectively preventing virus replication. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231:2286–302. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kim D, Lee JY, Yang JS, Kim JW, Kim VN, Chang H. The architecture of SARS-CoV-2 transcriptome. Cell. 2020;181:914–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Redondo N, Zaldívar-López S, Garrido JJ, Montoya M. SARS-CoV-2 accessory proteins in viral pathogenesis: knowns and unknowns. Front Immunol. 2021;12:708264. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.708264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Arya R, Kumari S, Pandey B, Mistry H, Bihani SC, Das A, et al. Structural insights into SARS-CoV-2 proteins. J Mol Biol. 2021;433:166725. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Buchkovich NJ, Maguire TG, Yu Y, Paton AW, Paton JC, Alwine JC. Human cytomegalovirus specifically controls the levels of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP/GRP78, which is required for virion assembly. J Virol. 2008;82:31–9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01881-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Buchkovich NJ, Maguire TG, Paton AW, Paton JC, Alwine JC. The endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP/GRP78 is important in the structure and function of the human cytomegalovirus assembly compartment. J Virol. 2009;83:11421–8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00762-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cho DY, Yang GH, Ryu CJ, Hong HJ. Molecular chaperone GRP78/BiP interacts with the large surface protein of hepatitis B virus in vitro and in vivo. J Virol. 2003;77:2784–8. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.4.2784-2788.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wati S, Soo ML, Zilm P, Li P, Paton AW, Burrell CJ, et al. Dengue virus infection induces upregulation of GRP78, which acts to chaperone viral antigen production. J Virol. 2009;83:12871–80. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01419-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ha DP, Shin WJ, Hernandez JC, Neamati N, Dubeau L, Machida K, et al. GRP78 inhibitor YUM70 suppresses SARS-CoV-2 viral entry, spike protein production and ameliorates lung damage. Viruses. 2023;15:1118. doi: 10.3390/v15051118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D535–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cao Z, Xia H, Rajsbaum R, Xia X, Wang H, Shi PY. Ubiquitination of SARS-CoV-2 ORF7a promotes antagonism of interferon response. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:746–8. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-00603-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhou Z, Huang C, Zhou Z, Huang Z, Su L, Kang S, et al. Structural insight reveals SARS-CoV-2 ORF7a as an immunomodulating factor for human CD14+ monocytes. iScience. 2021;24:102187. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nemudryi A, Nemudraia A, Wiegand T, Nichols J, Snyder DT, Hedges JF, et al. SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance identifies naturally occurring truncation of ORF7a that limits immune suppression. Cell Rep. 2021;35:109197. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhang Y, Chen Y, Li Y, Huang F, Luo B, Yuan Y, et al. The ORF8 protein of SARS-CoV-2 mediates immune evasion through down-regulating MHC-Ι. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2024202118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024202118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Flower TG, Buffalo CZ, Hooy RM, Allaire M, Ren X, Hurley JH. Structure of SARS-CoV-2 ORF8, a rapidly evolving immune evasion protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118:e2021785118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021785118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lin X, Fu B, Yin S, Li Z, Liu H, Zhang H, et al. ORF8 contributes to cytokine storm during SARS-CoV-2 infection by activating IL-17 pathway. iScience. 2021;24:102293. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Girona J, Rodríguez-Borjabad C, Ibarretxe D, Vallvé JC, Ferré R, Heras M, et al. The circulating GRP78/BiP is a marker of metabolic diseases and atherosclerosis: bringing endoplasmic reticulum stress into the clinical scenario. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1793. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Drucker DJ. Diabetes, obesity, metabolism, and SARS-CoV-2 infection: the end of the beginning. Cell Metab. 2021;33:479–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Haga S, Yamamoto N, Nakai-Murakami C, Osawa Y, Tokunaga K, Sata T, et al. Modulation of TNF-alpha-converting enzyme by the spike protein of SARS-CoV and ACE2 induces TNF-alpha production and facilitates viral entry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:7809–14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711241105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chen M, Zhang Y, Yu VC, Chong YS, Yoshioka T, Ge R. Isthmin targets cell-surface GRP78 and triggers apoptosis via induction of mitochondrial dysfunction. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:797–810. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Merkel A, Chen Y, George A. Endocytic trafficking of DMP1 and GRP78 complex facilitates osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1175. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Puelles VG, Lütgehetmann M, Lindenmeyer MT, Sperhake JP, Wong MN, Allweiss L, et al. Multiorgan and renal tropism of SARS-CoV-2. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:590–2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2011400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Müller JA, Groß R, Conzelmann C, Krüger J, Merle U, Steinhart J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infects and replicates in cells of the human endocrine and exocrine pancreas. Nat Metab. 2021;3:149–65. doi: 10.1038/s42255-021-00347-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Liu J, Li Y, Liu Q, Yao Q, Wang X, Zhang H, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell tropism and multiorgan infection. Cell Discov. 2021;7:17. doi: 10.1038/s41421-021-00249-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shin J, Toyoda S, Nishitani S, Onodera T, Fukuda S, Kita S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs the insulin/IGF signaling pathway in the lung, liver, adipose tissue, and pancreatic cells via IRF1. Metabolism. 2022;133:155236. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2022.155236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Crook H, Raza S, Nowell J, Young M, Edison P. Long covid-mechanisms, risk factors, and management. BMJ. 2021;374:n1648. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Raveendran AV, Jayadevan R, Sashidharan S. Long COVID: an overview. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15:869–75. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sudre CH, Murray B, Varsavsky T, Graham MS, Penfold RS, Bowyer RC, et al. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat Med. 2021;27:626–31. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01292-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Misra UK, Deedwania R, Pizzo SV. Activation and cross-talk between Akt, NF-kappaB, and unfolded protein response signaling in 1-LN prostate cancer cells consequent to ligation of cell surface-associated GRP78. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:13694–707. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511694200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kelber JA, Panopoulos AD, Shani G, Booker EC, Belmonte JC, Vale WW, et al. Blockade of Cripto binding to cell surface GRP78 inhibits oncogenic Cripto signaling via MAPK/PI3K and Smad2/3 pathways. Oncogene. 2009;28:2324–36. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Gopal U, Mowery Y, Young K, Pizzo SV. Targeting cell surface GRP78 enhances pancreatic cancer radiosensitivity through YAP/TAZ protein signaling. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:13939–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Fu R, Yang P, Wu HL, Li ZW, Li ZY. GRP78 secreted by colon cancer cells facilitates cell proliferation via PI3K/Akt signaling. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:7245–9. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.17.7245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Misra UK, Gonzalez-Gronow M, Gawdi G, Hart JP, Johnson CE, Pizzo SV. The role of Grp 78 in alpha 2-macroglobulin-induced signal transduction: evidence from RNA interference that the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein is associated with, but not necessary for, GRP 78-mediated signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:42082–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206174200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Gopal U, Gonzalez-Gronow M, Pizzo SV. Activated α2-macroglobulin regulates transcriptional activation of c-MYC target genes through cell surface GRP78 protein. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:10904–15. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.708131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Yun S, Yun CW, Lee JH, Kim S, Lee SH. Cripto enhances proliferation and survival of mesenchymal stem cells by up-regulating JAK2/STAT3 pathway in a GRP78-dependent manner. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2018;26:464–73. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2017.099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Puzyrenko A, Jacobs ER, Sun Y, Felix JC, Sheinin Y, Ge L, et al. Pneumocytes are distinguished by highly elevated expression of the ER stress biomarker GRP78, a co-receptor for SARS-CoV-2, in COVID-19 autopsies. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2021;26:859–68. doi: 10.1007/s12192-021-01230-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Ye R, Jung DY, Jun JY, Li J, Luo S, Ko HJ, et al. Grp78 heterozygosity promotes adaptive unfolded protein response and attenuates diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2010;59:6–16. doi: 10.2337/db09-0755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kim JH, Lee E, Friedline RH, Suk S, Jung DY, Dagdeviren S, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum chaperone GRP78 regulates macrophage function and insulin resistance in diet-induced obesity. FASEB J. 2018;32:2292–304. doi: 10.1096/fj.201701017R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Luo D, Fan N, Zhang X, Ngo FY, Zhao J, Zhao W, et al. Covalent inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum chaperone GRP78 disconnects the transduction of ER stress signals to inflammation and lipid accumulation in diet-induced obese mice. Elife. 2022;11:e72182. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Nakatsuka A, Wada J, Iseda I, Teshigawara S, Higashio K, Murakami K, et al. Vaspin is an adipokine ameliorating ER stress in obesity as a ligand for cell-surface GRP78/MTJ-1 complex. Diabetes. 2012;61:2823–32. doi: 10.2337/db12-0232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ayaub EA, Kolb PS, Mohammed-Ali Z, Tat V, Murphy J, Bellaye PS, et al. GRP78 and CHOP modulate macrophage apoptosis and the development of bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. J Pathol. 2016;239:411–25. doi: 10.1002/path.4738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Leonard A, Grose V, Paton AW, Paton JC, Yule DI, Rahman A, et al. Selective inactivation of intracellular BiP/GRP78 attenuates endothelial inflammation and permeability in acute lung injury. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2096. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38312-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Triantafilou M, Fradelizi D, Triantafilou K. Major histocompatibility class one molecule associates with glucose regulated protein (GRP) 78 on the cell surface. Hum Immunol. 2001;62:764–70. doi: 10.1016/S0198-8859(01)00269-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Gumashta J, Gumashta R. COVID19 associated mucormycosis: is GRP78 a possible link? J Infect Public Health. 2021;14:1351–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ghosh D, Dey S, Chakraborty H, Mukherjee S, Halder A, Sarkar A, et al. Mucormycosis: a new threat to coronavirus disease 2019 with special emphasis on India. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022;15:101013. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2022.101013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Feldman C, Anderson R. The role of co-infections and secondary infections in patients with COVID-19. Pneumonia (Nathan) 2021;13:5. doi: 10.1186/s41479-021-00083-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Quinones QJ, de Ridder GG, Pizzo SV. GRP78: a chaperone with diverse roles beyond the endoplasmic reticulum. Histol Histopathol. 2008;23:1409–16. doi: 10.14670/HH-23.1409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Booth L, Roberts JL, Cash DR, Tavallai S, Jean S, Fidanza A, et al. GRP78/BiP/HSPA5/Dna K is a universal therapeutic target for human disease. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:1661–76. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Roberts JL, Tavallai M, Nourbakhsh A, Fidanza A, Cruz-Luna T, Smith E, et al. GRP78/Dna K is a target for Nexavar/Stivarga/Votrient in the treatment of human malignancies, viral infections and bacterial diseases. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230:2552–78. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, Lu R, Han K, Wu G, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020;323:1843–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Brogna B, Brogna C, Petrillo M, Conte AM, Benincasa G, Montano L, et al. SARS-CoV-2 detection in fecal sample from a patient with typical findings of COVID-19 pneumonia on CT but negative to multiple SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests on oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swab samples. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021;57:290. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Brogna C, Brogna B, Bisaccia DR, Lauritano F, Marino G, Montano L, et al. Could SARS-CoV-2 have bacteriophage behavior or induce the activity of other bacteriophages? Vaccines (Basel) 2022;10:708. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zuo T, Zhang F, Lui GC, Yeoh YK, Li AY, Zhan H, et al. Alterations in gut microbiota of patients with COVID-19 during time of hospitalization. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:944–55. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Liu M, Spellberg B, Phan QT, Fu Y, Fu Y, Lee AS, et al. The endothelial cell receptor GRP78 is required for mucormycosis pathogenesis in diabetic mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120:1914–24. doi: 10.1172/JCI42164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kottom TJ, Hebrink DM, Limper AH. Binding of Pneumocystis carinii to the lung epithelial cell receptor HSPA5 (GRP78) J Med Microbiol. 2018;67:1772–7. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Nyland JE, Raja-Khan NT, Bettermann K, Haouzi PA, Leslie DL, Kraschnewski JL, et al. Diabetes, drug treatment, and mortality in COVID-19: a multinational retrospective cohort study. Diabetes. 2021;70:2903–16. doi: 10.2337/db21-0385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Nyland JE, Raja-Khan NT, Bettermann K, Haouzi PA, Leslie DL, Kraschnewski JL, et al. Diabetes, drug treatment, and mortality in COVID-19: a multinational retrospective cohort study. Diabetes. 2021;70:2903–16. doi: 10.2337/db21-0385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for the Study of Obesity

RESOURCES