Abstract
Methods for continuous production of viruses, and operation of the virustat, an apparatus in which such production was accomplished, were studied. Continuous production requires a separate continuous host growth chamber, such as the chemostat, and a multiunit virus growth chamber into which the virus-inoculated host cells are led. Successful continuous output of MS-2 and ϕX174 viruses, the latter in lysates, over periods of several days and at titers approximating those of batch lysates, was observed. Design problems include chamber sizes and flow rates, growth of resistant mutants within both virus and host growth chambers, clogging by lysis debris, and the phenomenon of self-inoculation. The latter represents virus growth in the first section of the chamber in excess of the washout rate, leading to lack of need for virus inoculation after an initial period. Use of the virustat for production and research purposes will require some attention to the formation of resistant bacterial colonies at pockets and surface sites of limited washout. With the virustat as a continuous virus production device, continuous purification methods are desirable. Research use of the virustat in continuous mutagenic population studies would require suppression of self-inoculation by use of many sections in the chamber, and improved servo control of host populations at low concentrations.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- DAVIS J. E., SINSHEIMER R. L. The replication of bacteriophage MS2. 1. Transfer of parental nucleic acid to progeny phage. J Mol Biol. 1963 Mar;6:203–207. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(63)80069-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FOX M. S., SZILARD L. A device for growing bacterial populations under steady state conditions. J Gen Physiol. 1955 Nov 20;39(2):261–266. doi: 10.1085/jgp.39.2.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Filner P. Semi-conservative replication of DNA in a higher plant cell. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Aug;39(1):33–39. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(65)90004-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KUBITSCHEK H. E., BENDIGKEIT H. E. MUTATION IN CONTINUOUS CULTURES. I. DEPENDENCE OF MUTATIONAL RESPONSE UPON GROWTH-LIMITING FACTORS. Mutat Res. 1964 Jul;106:113–120. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(64)90013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McLIMANS W. F., GIARDINELLO F. E., DAVIS E. V., KUCERA C. J., RAKE G. W. Submerged culture of mammalian cells: the five liter fermentor. J Bacteriol. 1957 Dec;74(6):768–774. doi: 10.1128/jb.74.6.768-774.1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NOVICK A., SZILARD L. Description of the chemostat. Science. 1950 Dec 15;112(2920):715–716. doi: 10.1126/science.112.2920.715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]