ABSTRACT
We present the complete genome sequence of two Actinobacteriophages, OmniCritical and Barkley26, isolated in Clark County, NV. Over two semesters, The University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV) students isolated and purified phages and manually annotated the genomes. The courses follow the HHMI Science Education Alliance Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Sciences (SEA-PHAGES) curricula.
KEYWORDS: Mycobacterium, DNA master, phage commander, actinobacteriophages
ANNOUNCEMENT
OmniCritical was isolated from a compost tumbler at a private residence (36.131376 N, 115.240078 W) and Barkley26 from the soil of a polka dot plant (Hypoestes phyllostachya) grown at UNLV (36.10983 N, 115.14321 W). Phage isolation and purification followed the HHMI Phage Discovery Guide protocols with Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2 155 as the host (1). Phages were considered pure after three successive plaque assays produced plaques of uniform diameter and shape. High titer (1010–1011) lysates were generated for DNA isolation and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Genomic DNA was isolated using a commercial kit (Norgen Biotek), and both DNA samples were sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq System. The total reads for OmniCritical (SRX14483223) and Barkley26 (SRX14443484) were 777,403 and 737,822, respectively. Newbler (v. 2.9, 454 Life Science) was used for de novo assembly of the raw reads, generating a single contig as described in reference (2). Sequence completeness, accuracy, and phage genomic termini were assessed using Consed (v. 29) (3). In preparation for TEM, copper 300 mesh grids (Ted Pella, Inc.) were spotted with 10 µL of phage lysate and stained with 1% phosphotungstate (Electron Microscopy Services). TEM was performed at 120 keV on a JEOL JEM-1400 Plus at the Electron Microscopy Core Laboratory, University of Utah. Images were acquired with DigitalMicrograph with a Gatan Orius SC1000 CCD camera (1 s acquisition time).
From FASTA files, putative genes were identified with DNA Master (v5.38.8) and Phage Commander, which summarize query results from Glimmer (v3.02b), Genemark (v2.5), Genemark Hmm (v2.0), GenemarkS (v4.28), GenemarkS2, Genemark Heuristic (v.2.0), Prodigal (v2.6.3), RAST (v2.0), and Metagene (v2.0) (3–13). Putative genes and their start codons were evaluated using the method previously described (14). Putative functions were assigned using BLAST (10−7 E-value cutoff), CD-Search (0.001 E-value threshold), and HHPred (<0.0001 E-value); Aragorn was used to identify tRNA genes (15–18). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. Phage cluster and subcluster assignments were determined with Phamerator (19) using the protocols in reference (20). OmniCritical and Barkley26 are part of the fifth set of phages discovered at UNLV; since the course was first offered in 2017–2018, a total of 11 M. smegmatis phages have now been discovered and published (21–24). Interestingly, OmniCritical belongs to the K4 subcluster, to which phage Reptar3000, discovered at UNLV in 2018, also belongs. The GenBank and SRA accession numbers, average coverage depth, cluster assignment, and genome analyses appear in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Phage GenBank and SRA accession numbers and genome assembly results
| Phage name | GenBank accession no. | SRA accession no. | Average coverage (×) | Cluster and subcluster | Genome length (bp) | GC content (%) | No. of genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barkley26 | ON645337.1 | SRX14443484 | 2,499× | G G1 |
41,756 | 66.6% | 62 |
| OmniCritical | ON645342.1 | SRX14483223 | 1,894× | K K4 |
57,973 | 68.0% | 95 |
OmniCritical and Barkley26 are temperate Siphoviruses that produced 4.0 and 5.0 mm diameter plaques, respectively. The capsid diameter and tail length of OmniCritical are 79.1 and 232.6 nm; for Barkley26, these dimensions are 58.6 and 245.3 nm (Fig. 1). OmniCritical has 95 genes, 47 of which have an assigned protein function, with one being a tRNA-lysine gene. Barkley26 has 62 genes, and 29 have assigned protein functions. Both phages contain a programmed translational frameshift in the tail assembly chaperone protein, which was annotated according to the method described in reference (3). Both phages encode a tyrosine integrase, Cro, and an excisionase, indicating they are temperate. A complete list of genes and functions for both phages is available at The Actinobacteriophage Database (https://phagesdb.org).
Fig 1.
Transmission electron microscopy of Mycobacterium smegmatis bacteriophages (a) OmniCritical and (b) Barkley26 was performed at 120 keV on a JEOL JEM-1400 Plus at the Electron Microscopy Core Laboratory at the University of Utah. The images were captured by DigitalMicrograph with a Gatan Orius SC1000 CCD camera (1 s acquisition time) after being negatively stained with 10 µL of 1% phosphotungstate.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
K.R. and C.S. acknowledge the support from the HHMI SEA-PHAGES program and the Graham Hatfull Lab (University of Pittsburgh). We thank Aude Picard (UNLV) for imaging the phages, and the TEM was supported by NSF EPSCoR RII Track-4 Award (OIA 2033286) and the UNLV School of Life Sciences.
We thank Linda Nikolova and David Belnap for assistance at the Electron Microscopy Core Laboratory (University of Utah) and Julianne Grose (Brigham Young University) for the grid spotting protocol.
K.R. acknowledges support from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM103440; NV INBRE).
Contributor Information
Kurt Regner, Email: kurt.regner@unlv.edu.
John J. Dennehy, Department of Biology, Queens College, New York, New York, USA
REFERENCES
- 1. Poxleitner M, Pope W, Jacobs-Sera D, Sivanathan V, Hatfull G. 2018. Phage discovery guide. Howard hughes medical institute, Chevy Chase, MD. Available from: https://seaphagesphagediscoveryguide.helpdocsonline.com/home [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. 1998. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res 8:195–202. doi: 10.1101/gr.8.3.195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D. 2018. Annotation of bacteriophage genome sequences using DNA master: an overview, p 217–229. In Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM, Lavigne R (ed), Bacteriophages. Springer, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lazeroff M, Ryder G, Harris SL, Tsourkas PK. 2021. Phage commander, an application for rapid gene identification in bacteriophage genomes using multiple programs. Phage (New Rochelle) 2:204–213. doi: 10.1089/phage.2020.0044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Borodovsky M, McIninch J. 1993. GENMARK: parallel gene recognition for both DNA strands. Computers & Chemistry 17:123–133. doi: 10.1016/0097-8485(93)85004-V [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M. 1998. Genemark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res 26:1107–1115. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.4.1107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. 2001. Genemarks: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2607–2618. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.12.2607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lomsadze A, Gemayel K, Tang S, Borodovsky M. 2018. Modeling leaderless transcription and atypical genes results in more accurate gene prediction in prokaryotes. Genome Res 28:1079–1089. doi: 10.1101/gr.230615.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. McNair K, Aziz RK, Pusch GD, Overbeek R, Dutilh BE, Edwards R. 2018. Phage genome annotation using the RAST pipeline, p 231–238. In Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM, Lavigne R (ed), Bacteriophages. Springer, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Noguchi H, Park J, Takagi T. 2006. Metagene: prokaryotic gene finding from environmental genome shotgun sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34:5623–5630. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Besemer J, Borodovsky M. 2005. Genemark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W451–4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Salisbury A, Tsourkas PK. 2019. A method for improving the accuracy and efficiency of bacteriophage genome annotation. Int J Mol Sci 20:3391. doi: 10.3390/ijms20143391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. 2004. CD-search: protein domain annotations on the fly. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W327–31. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D, Russell DA, Peebles CL, Al-Atrache Z, Alcoser TA, Alexander LM, Alfano MB, Alford ST, Amy NE, Anderson MD, Anderson AG, Ang AAS, Ares M, Barber AJ, Barker LP, Barrett JM, Barshop WD, Bauerle CM, Bayles IM, Belfield KL, Best AA, Borjon A, Bowman CA, Boyer CA, Bradley KW, Bradley VA, Broadway LN, Budwal K, Busby KN, Campbell IW, Campbell AM, Carey A, Caruso SM, Chew RD, Cockburn CL, Cohen LB, Corajod JM, Cresawn SG, Davis KR, Deng L, Denver DR, Dixon BR, Ekram S, Elgin SCR, Engelsen AE, English BEV, Erb ML, Estrada C, Filliger LZ, Findley AM, Forbes L, Forsyth MH, Fox TM, Fritz MJ, Garcia R, George ZD, Georges AE, Gissendanner CR, Goff S, Goldstein R, Gordon KC, Green RD, Guerra SL, Guiney-Olsen KR, Guiza BG, Haghighat L, Hagopian GV, Harmon CJ, Harmson JS, Hartzog GA, Harvey SE, He S, He KJ, Healy KE, Higinbotham ER, Hildebrandt EN, Ho JH, Hogan GM, Hohenstein VG, Holz NA, Huang VJ, Hufford EL, Hynes PM, Jackson AS, Jansen EC, Jarvik J, Jasinto PG, Jordan TC, Kasza T, Katelyn MA, Kelsey JS, Kerrigan LA, Khaw D, Kim J, Knutter JZ, Ko C-C, Larkin GV, Laroche JR, Latif A, Leuba KD, Leuba SI, Lewis LO, Loesser-Casey KE, Long CA, Lopez AJ, Lowery N, Lu TQ, Mac V, Masters IR, McCloud JJ, McDonough MJ, Medenbach AJ, Menon A, Miller R, Morgan BK, Ng PC, Nguyen E, Nguyen KT, Nguyen ET, Nicholson KM, Parnell LA, Peirce CE, Perz AM, Peterson LJ, Pferdehirt RE, Philip SV, Pogliano K, Pogliano J, Polley T, Puopolo EJ, Rabinowitz HS, Resiss MJ, Rhyan CN, Robinson YM, Rodriguez LL, Rose AC, Rubin JD, Ruby JA, Saha MS, Sandoz JW, Savitskaya J, Schipper DJ, Schnitzler CE, Schott AR, Segal JB, Shaffer CD, Sheldon KE, Shepard EM, Shepardson JW, Shroff MK, Simmons JM, Simms EF, Simpson BM, Sinclair KM, Sjoholm RL, Slette IJ, Spaulding BC, Straub CL, Stukey J, Sughrue T, Tang T-Y, Tatyana LM, Taylor SB, Taylor BJ, Temple LM, Thompson JV, Tokarz MP, Trapani SE, Troum AP, Tsay J, Tubbs AT, Walton JM, Wang DH, Wang H, Warner JR, Weisser EG, Wendler SC, Weston-Hafer KA, Whelan HM, Williamson KE, Willis AN, Wirtshafter HS, Wong TW, Wu P, Yang Y jeong, Yee BC, Zaidins DA, Zhang B, Zúniga MY, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF, Aziz R. 2011. Expanding the diversity of mycobacteriophages: insights into genome architecture and evolution. PLoS ONE 6:e16329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Thompson J, Özdemir A, Topchyan AM, Torosian M, Thymianos VZ, Eagle A, McCormick J, Boyles LKG, Benito AA, Regner K, Strong C, Tsourkas PK, Roux S. 2021. Complete genome sequences of cluster A6 and cluster G1 Mycobacterium smegmatis phages hoot and jolene. Microbiol Resour Announc 10:e0057821. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00578-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Nie W, Abdela F, Eivazi B, Eivazi B, Van RHL, Kickbusch D, Finkle M, Cris C, Rubinstein M, Akavan B, Raja M, Vergara J. 2020. Complete genome sequences of cluster P1 and cluster C1 Mycobacterium smegmatis phages jung and ronan. Microbiol Resour Announc 925:e00678-202254. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00678-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Salisbury A, Cassin E, Ayala-Pineda K, Barroga N, Cadiz V, Cisneros R, Fersini J, Jeanite T, Juste J, Ines J, Leyva G, Macalinao D, Muscelli S, Nhan S, Reyes GS, Rhoden H, Tan R, Torres E, Tran K, Uriarte-Valle G, Wallace C, Wong S, Regner K, Strong C, Tsourkas PK, Thrash JC. 2019. Complete genome sequences of Mycobacterium smegmatis phages chewbacca, reptar3000, and riparian, isolated in Las Vegas, Nevada. Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e01558-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01558-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Salisbury A, Doss R, Mehta A, Bhatti K, Dapra C, Huntsinger A, Rodriguez S, Yacek S, Sandberg R, Gildore A, Knudtson J, Tibayan F, Ohta T, Zafar N, Mercado G, Le A, Mekhaeel N, Willer J, Rodrich-Zuniga E, McFarland M, Regner K, Strong C, Tsourkas PK, Roux S. 2019. Complete genome sequences of Mycobacterium smegmatis phages nihilnomen and carlyle, isolated in Las Vegas, Nevada. Microbiol Resour Announc 8:e00677-19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00677-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

