ABSTRACT
The gut and flesh microbiome of the national fish of Bangladesh, Tenualosa ilisha, were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Our findings revealed a significant microbial disparity between sample categories and the habitat of hilsa fish, which will serve as a valuable foundation for further comprehensive studies on the hilsa microbiome.
KEYWORDS: Tenualosa ilisha, Hilsa flesh, gut microbiome, metagenomics
ANNOUNCEMENT
Hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) is the national fish of Bangladesh. It contributes ~12% of the total fish production and 1.15% GDP of the country (1). It is widely distributed in Southeast and South Asia (2, 3) and found in coastal areas, estuaries, brackish, and freshwater rivers (3, 4). Hilsa is an anadromous marine fish that comes to freshwater in rivers during spawning. Gut microbiota, which modulate host homeostasis, immunity, and fitness (5, 6), have been analyzed in many fish species (7, 8) but rarely in the hilsa fish (1). Nothing is known about the gut and flesh microbiome of hilsa, which is known to be free from diseases. This study aimed to analyze the gut and flesh microbiome of hilsa fish using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.
Eighteen adult hilsa fishes were collected and frozen from September to October 2020 from five different sites in Bangladesh (Table 1). Sampling of their intestinal contents (n = 15) and flesh (n = 3) was performed within 48 h after the collection. Fish scales from the body of all individual fishes were removed by sterile forceps under aseptic conditions, and fleshes (100 mg) and lower stomach contents (100 mg) from each fish were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from each specimen after grinding (flesh) and homogenization (gut content) using DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions. A NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer was used to check the purity and concentration of DNA. The amplicon libraries were prepared using Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina Inc.) as per the 16S amplicon sequencing library preparation protocol, and V3–V4 regions were amplified through a 40-cycle PCR using 341F and 806R primers (9). Paired-end sequencing (2 × 150 bp, 300 cycles) was performed on the Illumina MiniSeq sequencer. FastQC v0.11.9 (10) was used to check the quality of the reads, while Trimmomatic v0.39 (11) removed Illumina adapters, known Illumina artifacts, and phiX reads. The demultiplexed sequencing data were processed using QIIME 2 (2023.2.0) and associated plugins (12). Sequences showing ≥98% similarity were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the SILVA database v.138 (13). Default parameters were used for bioinformatic analyses, except where otherwise stated.
TABLE 1.
Sample ID | Collection site | Coordinate | Habitat | Source | No. of raw reads | No. of mapped reads | No. of observed OTUs | SRA accessions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CG1 | Confluence of Meghna and Padma River, Chandpur | 23.2321° N, 90.6631° E | Freshwater | Gut | 325,812 | 33,295 | 22 | SRR24402593 |
CG2 | Confluence of Meghna and Padma River, Chandpur | 23.2321° N, 90.6631° E | Freshwater | Gut | 140,124 | 12,418 | 22 | SRR24402592 |
CG3 | Confluence of Meghna and Padma River, Chandpur | 23.2321° N, 90.6631° E | Freshwater | Gut | 119,676 | 4,738 | 10 | SRR24402608 |
CG4 | Confluence of Meghna and Padma River, Chandpur | 23.2321° N, 90.6631° E | Freshwater | Gut | 697,544 | 291,731 | 23 | SRR24402607 |
CG5 | Confluence of Meghna and Padma River, Chandpur | 23.2321° N, 90.6631° E | Freshwater | Gut | 131,276 | 9,514 | 20 | SRR24402606 |
RG3 | Padma River, Rajshahi | 24.3745° N, 88.6042° E | Freshwater | Gut | 194,464 | 2,256 | 18 | SRR24402605 |
MG1 | Meghna River, Munshiganj | 23.5422° N, 90.5305° E | Freshwater | Gut | 165,096 | 1,333 | 15 | SRR24402604 |
MG2 | Meghna River, Munshiganj | 23.5422° N, 90.5305° E | Freshwater | Gut | 126,908 | 7,353 | 15 | SRR24402602 |
MG4 | Meghna River, Munshiganj | 23.5422° N, 90.5305° E | Freshwater | Gut | 260,420 | 3,077 | 11 | SRR24402601 |
PG1 | Payra River, Patuakhali | 22.3586° N, 90.3317° E | Brackish water | Gut | 149,988 | 611 | 23 | SRR24402600 |
PG2 | Payra River, Patuakhali | 22.3586° N, 90.3317° E | Brackish water | Gut | 119,052 | 1,142 | 11 | SRR24402598 |
PG3 | Payra River, Patuakhali | 22.3586° N, 90.3317° E | Brackish water | Gut | 361,312 | 8,111 | 20 | SRR24402599 |
PG5 | Payra River, Patuakhali | 22.3586° N, 90.3317° E | Brackish water | Gut | 178,372 | 3,982 | 18 | SRR24402597 |
XG1 | Bay of Bengal, Cox’s Bazar |
21.4272° N, 92.0058° E | Marine water | Gut | 112,684 | 509 | 16 | SRR24402596 |
XG3 | Bay of Bengal, Cox’s Bazar |
21.4272° N, 92.0058° E | Marine water | Gut | 151,480 | 260 | 14 | SRR24402595 |
CF4 | Confluence of Meghna and Padma River, Chandpur | 23.2321° N, 90.6631° E | Freshwater | Flesh | 180,944 | 4,994 | 16 | SRR24402609 |
CF5 | Confluence of Meghna and Padma River, Chandpur | 23.2321° N, 90.6631° E | Freshwater | Flesh | 106,604 | 2,226 | 14 | SRR24402603 |
PF4 | Payra River, Patuakhali | 22.3586° N, 90.3317° E | Brackish water | Flesh | 174,852 | 2,739 | 17 | SRR24402594 |
The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of 18 samples generated 3,696,608 raw reads (average: 205,367 reads/sample), of which 390,289 quality reads (10.56%) mapped to 325 OTUs of bacteria. The rest of the reads (90%) were unassigned to any OTUs and might come from host DNA. Among these, 67 and 258 OTUs were identified in flesh and gut samples, respectively, through the SILVA database v.138 (Table 1). These OTUs were represented by six phyla, nine classes, 19 orders, 26 families, and 40 genera of bacteria. Firmicutes constituted >75.0% of the hilsa bacteriome, with 78.17% and 2.86% relative abundances in the gut and flesh, respectively. Vagococcus (67.02%), Morganella (13.25%), Enterobacter (5.74%), Plesiomonas (3.51%), Shigella (1.75%), Clostridium (1.60%), Klebsiella (1.02%), and Serratia (1.0%) were the top abundant bacterial genera detected in hilsa fish, with distinct variations in their relative abundances according to the sample categories (gut and flesh; P = 0.0127; Kruskal Wallis test). The genomic data of the flesh and gut bacteriome of hilsa fish revealed in this study has laid the foundation for shedding light on the microbiome of this economically important trans-boundary fish.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are thankful to the "BSMRAU Physical Facility and Research Capacity Strengthening Project" under the Ministry of Education, People’s Republic of Bangladesh, for funding this research. The authors sincerely thank A.Q.M. Robiul Kawser, Assistant Professor, Department of Aquaculture, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU), Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh, and Nur Uddin Mahmud of the IBGE, BSMRAU, for their support in sampling, technical assistance in genomic DNA extraction, and PCR.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this paper.
Contributor Information
Tofazzal Islam, Email: tofazzalislam@bsmrau.edu.bd.
Frank J. Stewart, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
The 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA964437. The accession numbers for all SRA experiments are listed in Table 1.
REFERENCES
- 1. Foysal MJ, Momtaz F, Robiul Kawser AQM, Chaklader MR, Siddik MAB, Lamichhane B, Tay ACY, Rahman MM, Fotedar R. 2019. Microbiome patterns reveal the transmission of pathogenic bacteria in hilsa fish (Tenualosa Ilisha) marketed for human consumption in Bangladesh. J Appl Microbiol 126:1879–1890. doi: 10.1111/jam.14257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sahoo AK, Wahab M, Phillips M, Rahman A, Padiyar A, Puvanendran V, Bangera R, Belton B, De DK, Meena DK, Behera BK, Sharma AP, Bhaumik U, Mohanty BP, Choudhury SR, Mohan CV. 2018. Breeding and culture status of hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha, ham. 1822) in South Asia: a review. Rev Aquacult 10:96–110. doi: 10.1111/raq.12149 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mandal S, Lal KK, Singh RK, Sah RS, Jena JK, Singh A, Mohindra V. 2018. Comparative length-weight relationship and condition factor of hilsa shad, Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton, 1822) from freshwater, estuarine and marine environments in India. Indian J. Fish 65:33–41. doi: 10.21077/ijf.2018.65.2.73732-04 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Nima A, Hossain M, Rahman M, Mawa Z, Hasan M, Islam M, Rahman M, Tanjin S, Sabbir W, Bashar M, Mahmud Y. 2020. Temporal variations of length, weight, and condition of hilsa shad, Tenualosa ilisha (Hamilton, 1822) in the meghna river, southeastern Bangladesh. Egypt J of Aquatic Biolo and Fish 24:481–494. doi: 10.21608/ejabf.2020.88776 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Wu H-J, Wu E. 2012. The role of gut microbiota in immune homeostasis and autoimmunity. Gut Microbes 3:4–14. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hoque MN, Rahman MS, Islam T, Sultana M, Crandall KA, Hossain MA. 2022. Induction of mastitis by cow-to-mouse fecal and milk microbiota transplantation causes microbiome dysbiosis and genomic functional perturbation in mice. Anim Microbiome 4:43. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00193-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ogita T. 2023. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of the gut microbiota of chimaera phantasma (silver chimaera) captured off Koshimoda in Suruga Bay, Japan. Microbiol Resour Announc 12:e0114922. doi: 10.1128/mra.01149-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Egerton S, Culloty S, Whooley J, Stanton C, Ross RP. 2018. The gut microbiota of marine fish. Front Microbiol 9:873. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Islam T, Fatema, Hoque MN, Gupta DR, Mahmud NU, Sakif TI, Sharpe AG. 2023. Improvement of growth, yield and associated Bacteriome of rice by the application of Probiotic Paraburkholderia and Delftia. Front Microbiol 14:1212505. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1212505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Andrews S. 2017. Fastqc: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://github.com/s-andrews/FastQC.
- 11. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodríguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, Douglas GM, Durall DM, Duvallet C, Edwardson CF, Ernst M, Estaki M, Fouquier J, Gauglitz JM, Gibbons SM, Gibson DL, Gonzalez A, Gorlick K, Guo J, Hillmann B, Holmes S, Holste H, Huttenhower C, Huttley GA, Janssen S, Jarmusch AK, Jiang L, Kaehler BD, Kang KB, Keefe CR, Keim P, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koester I, Kosciolek T, Kreps J, Langille MGI, Lee J, Ley R, Liu Y-X, Loftfield E, Lozupone C, Maher M, Marotz C, Martin BD, McDonald D, McIver LJ, Melnik AV, Metcalf JL, Morgan SC, Morton JT, Naimey AT, Navas-Molina JA, Nothias LF, Orchanian SB, Pearson T, Peoples SL, Petras D, Preuss ML, Pruesse E, Rasmussen LB, Rivers A, Robeson MS, Rosenthal P, Segata N, Shaffer M, Shiffer A, Sinha R, Song SJ, Spear JR, Swafford AD, Thompson LR, Torres PJ, Trinh P, Tripathi A, Turnbaugh PJ, Ul-Hasan S, van der Hooft JJJ, Vargas F, Vázquez-Baeza Y, Vogtmann E, von Hippel M, Walters W, Wan Y, Wang M, Warren J, Weber KC, Williamson CHD, Willis AD, Xu ZZ, Zaneveld JR, Zhang Y, Zhu Q, Knight R, Caporaso JG. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0252-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA964437. The accession numbers for all SRA experiments are listed in Table 1.