ABSTRACT
We report the genomes of two viruses with siphovirus morphology, OtterstedtS21 and Patos, from Albany, New York, using Gordonia rubripertincta. The genomes of OtterstedtS21 and Patos are ~68 kbp long with 58% GC content. Both phages group with cluster DV based on gene content similarity to phages in the Actinobacteriophage database.
KEYWORDS: bacteriophage, Gordonia
ANNOUNCEMENT
Gordonia are Gram-positive bacteria that belong to the actinobacterium phylum. Several members of Gordonia species have been observed to break down hydrocarbons and are thus potential bio-remediators that may be capable of reducing environmental pollution (1). Bacteriophages have also played incredibly important roles in shaping our understanding of microorganisms (2). To further our understanding of the genetic diversity and evolution of Gordonia phages, we report the discovery of two actinobacteriophages, OtterstedtS21 and Patos, which infect G. rubripertincta.
In the fall of 2021, phage OtterstedtS21 was isolated from soil collected from an active construction site near the Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Campus (42.646943°N, 73.778489°W) and phage Patos from soil collected at Lincoln Park in Albany, New York (42.644879°N, 73.76418°W), using standard procedures (2). In brief, each soil sample was mixed with PYCa (peptone, yeast extract, and calcium) liquid medium, filtered using a 0.22-µm filter, and the filtrate inoculated with G. rubripertincta and incubated with shaking at 30°C. After 2 days, the culture was centrifuged, and the supernatant was screened for phage by plating in PYCa top agar with G. rubripertincta. Both phages were purified through several rounds of plating (2). Transmission electron microscopy revealed both the phages to have siphovirus morphology (Fig. 1; Table 1).
Fig 1.
Electron micrographs of Gordonia phages OtterstedtS21 (A) and Patos (B). Negative stain (uranyl acetate, 1%) transmission electron microscopy of phages OtterstedtS21 (A) and Patos (B) reveals typical siphovirus morphology. The scale at bottom right of each image is 200 nm.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of cluster DV siphoviruses OtterstedtS21 and Patos
Phage name | Number of reads (150 bp single base reads) | Coverage | Genome length | GC% | Capsid size | Tail length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OtterstedtS21 | 406,310 | 752× | 67,688 bp | 58.2% | ~93 nm (n = 1) | ~650 nm (n = 1) |
Patos | 503,759 | 4358× | 68,847 bp | 58.3% | ~86 nm (n = 1) | ~586 nm (n = 1) |
DNA was extracted from OtterstedtS21 and Patos lysates using Wizard DNA Clean-Up Kit (Promega), prepared as sequencing libraries at the University of Pittsburgh Sequencing facility using the NEB Ultra-II Library Kit (New England Biolabs), and sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq (v3 reagents) to generate 150 base single-end reads as shown in Table 1. Raw reads were then assembled using Newbler v2.9 and verified for accuracy using Consed v29 (3). Both phages have circularly permuted genomes that share 95.2% nucleotide identity with each other (Table 1).
Autoannotation of the genome was performed using DNA Master v5.23.6 (4), Glimmer v 3.02b (5), and GeneMark v2.5p (6). Manual refinement of the gene calls was conducted using a combination of DNA Master v5.23.6 (4), Phamerator (7), and Starterator (http://phages.wustl.edu/starterator/). NCBI BLASTp (8) and HHPred (9) were used to assign gene functions, and TMHMM (10) and SOSUI (11) were used to identify potential membrane proteins (12). ARAGORN (13) and tRNAscan-SE (14) were used to identify potential tRNAs. All programs were used with default settings.
OtterstedtS21 and Patos are predicted to encode 98 and 102 protein-coding genes, respectively, all on the same strand, with no predicted tRNAs. Both phages share 91% gene content similarity (GCS) and, based on GCS of >35% to phages in the Actinobacteriophage database (phagesDB.org), both phages are grouped into bacteriophage cluster DV (15, 16). One half of both genomes encode virus structure and assembly functions, whereas the other half encodes for functions involved in DNA metabolism. Patos encodes for a DNA binding protein (gp64) and an HNH endonuclease (gp83) that are not present in OtterstedtS21. No immunity repressor or integrase functions could be identified in either phage, consistent with other cluster DV phages which suggest that neither phage is likely to establish lysogeny.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the ACPHS Department of Basic and Clinical Sciences for their support and funding. We thank Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) for their support in bringing this program to our institution. We would also like to thank the University of Pittsburgh DNA Sequencing facility for assistance in sequencing the genome and the University of Maryland Baltimore County TEM facility for providing TEM images of our phages. We thank the entire SEA-PHAGES community, especially the moderators, who helped us learn the annotation process during the 2021 Phage Genomics Workshop.
Contributor Information
Pradeepa Jayachandran, Email: pradeepa.jayachandran@acphs.edu.
Kenneth M. Stedman, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
OtterstedtS21 is available at GenBank with Accession No. OP172870 and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) No. SRX14483247. Patos is available at GenBank with Accession No. OP172876 and SRA No. SRX14483245.
REFERENCES
- 1. Arenskötter M, Bröker D, Steinbüchel A. 2004. Biology of the metabolically diverse genus Gordonia. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:3195–3204. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.6.3195-3204.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Poxleitner M, Pope W, Jacobs-Sera D, Sivanathan V, Hatfull G. 2018. Phage discovery guide. Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Available from: https://seaphagesphagediscoveryguide.helpdocsonline.com/home [Google Scholar]
- 3. Russell DA. 2018. Sequencing, assembling, and finishing complete bacteriophage genomes. Methods Mol Biol 1681:109–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D. 2018. Annotation of bacteriophage genome sequences using DNA master: an overview. Methods Mol Biol 1681:217–229. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7343-9_16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Besemer J, Borodovsky M. 2005. Genemark: web software for gene finding in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W451–4. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Cresawn SG, Bogel M, Day N, Jacobs-Sera D, Hendrix RW, Hatfull GF. 2011. Phamerator: a bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 12:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Söding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer ELL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hirokawa T, Boon-Chieng S, Mitaku S. 1998. SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics 14:378–379. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.4.378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pope WH, Jacobs-Sera D, Cresawn SG. 2017. SEA PHAGES bioinformatics guide. Available from: https://seaphagesbioinformatics.helpdocsonline.com/home
- 13. Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Russell DA, Hatfull GF. 2017. PhagesDB: the actinobacteriophage database. Bioinformatics 33:784–786. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Pope WH, Mavrich TN, Garlena RA, Guerrero-Bustamante CA, Jacobs-Sera D, Montgomery MT, Russell DA, Warner MH, Hatfull GF, Science Education Alliance-Phage Hunters Advancing Genomics and Evolutionary Science (SEA-PHAGES) . 2017. Bacteriophages of Gordonia spp. display a spectrum of diversity and genetic relationships. mBio 8:e01069-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01069-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
OtterstedtS21 is available at GenBank with Accession No. OP172870 and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) No. SRX14483247. Patos is available at GenBank with Accession No. OP172876 and SRA No. SRX14483245.