Skip to main content
Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache logoLink to Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache
. 2022 Jun 2;36(2):3010. doi: 10.11607/ofph.3010

Psychologic Impact of Chronic Orofacial Pain: A Critical Review

Aalia Karamat 1,2,3, Jared G Smith 4,5,6, Lydia Nabil Fouad Melek 7,8,9,10, Tara Renton 11,12,13
PMCID: PMC10586586  PMID: 35943323

Abstract

Aims:

To explore the prevalence of clinically significant anxiety and depression in adult patients with chronic orofacial pain (COFP) conditions.

Methods:

A systematic online search of the Medline (PubMed) and Ovid databases was performed for articles published from 2006 to 2019. Observational studies—including cross-sectional, case-control, and case series—and longitudinal prospective studies were included. A total of 118 articles were selected for inclusion, and the prevalence rates of clinically significant anxiety and depression were summarized.

Results:

Most studies focused on temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain and less often on neuropathic COFP conditions. Prevalence rates varied widely across studies according to OFP condition and assessment measure; most questionnaire-based assessments yielded rates of clinically significant depression and anxiety in, respectively, 40% to 60% and 40% to 65% of individuals with TMD and in 20% to 50% and 25% to 55% of patients with neuropathic, mixed, or idiopathic/atypical COFP conditions. Rates of anxiety and depression were lower in studies using diagnostic instruments and in TMD studies with nonpatient samples. Most controlled studies showed a higher prevalence of anxiety and depression in individuals with COFP than in those without. Higher COFP pain levels and the presence of comorbid conditions such as migraines or widespread pain increased the likelihood of anxiety and/or depressive symptoms in individuals.

Conclusion:

Clinically significant anxiety and depression were commonly observed in patients with COFP, were present at higher rates than in pain-free participants in controlled studies, and were closely linked to pain severity. More research is needed to evaluate the psychologic impact of multiple COFP conditions in an individual and the prevalence of precondition psychologic morbidity. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2022;36:103–140. doi: 10.11607/ofph.3010

Keywords: anxiety, depression, neuropathic/nonneuropathic pain, orofacial pain, TMD


Orofacial pain is a noxious, painful experience in the region of the face and/or oral cavity.1 According to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), pain is defined as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with, or resembling that associated with, actual or potential tissue damage.”2 Chronic pain continues after the expected time of recovery.3 There is evidence that pre-existing psychologic factors can predict the onset of postsurgical chronic pain.4

Patients with chronic pain frequently undergo a change in their beliefs and cognitions, and these affective and cognitive pathways contribute to the sensory perception of pain.5 Over time, individuals with chronic pain may lose the capability to function optimally, and some may retire from work early.6 Nonorofacial chronic pain conditions can cause a significant degree of disability.7 In the United States, they are responsible for 21% of visits to accident and emergency departments and for 25% of absenteeism from work annually, significantly increasing the economic burden.8 Orofacial pain (OFP) is specifically linked to increased workday loss and excessive use of health care systems.9,10

The prevalence of OFP ranges from 17% to 26%, with up to 11% considered chronic orofacial pain (COFP).11 COFP is often associated with psychologic disorders, and there is a strong link between long-standing OFP and depression and anxiety symptoms, with subsequently impaired psychologic function.6 Pain management is limited without an acknowledgment of psychologic factors, and the recovery process is often compromised because differences in an individual’s psychologic predisposition result in differential responses to pain.12

The aim of this review was to investigate studies of psychologic functioning (ie, anxiety and depression) in patients with COFP, with consideration of both neuropathic and nonneuropathic COFP conditions.

Materials and Methods

The review protocol, including the search strategy, was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, registration number: CRD42016043703).13 It was not possible to perform meta-analyses due to the heterogeneity of the included studies. The cumulative evidence from the included studies was assessed, summarized, and narrated.

Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

The present review included observational studies published between 2006 and 2019. These studies were cross-sectional, case series, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies. The information sources were the Medline (PubMed) and Ovid databases. Gray literature was searched via Google Scholar. Studies in the English language investigating at least one type of COFP condition in adults (aged 18 and older) and exploring psychologic factors such as depression, somatization, posttraumatic stress disorder, and catastrophizing were selected. Studies recruiting individuals under the age of 18 years and studies exploring dental and periodontal inflammatory conditions and their psychosocial impacts or influences were excluded.

Definitions

Chronic pain is defined as a pain that exceeds a duration of 3 months,3 and this definition was applied to COFP for the present study.

Psychology is defined as the scientific study of an individual’s behaviors and their mental processes.14 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), depression is a mental disorder that presents with depressed mood, loss of interest or pleasure, a decreased level of interest and concentration, disturbed sleep, lack of appetite, and feelings of hopelessness and worthlessness.15 Depression can often be associated with anxiety symptoms.15 Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) was defined as 6 months of excessive worry about daily issues and may be associated with autonomic symptoms.15 State anxiety is a temporary emotional arousal to a perceived threat, and trait anxiety is a personality characteristic and pattern of response (with anxiety) to a threat.16 Phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and panic disorders were included in anxiety disorders. A phobia is a constant and pronounced fear of a situation that can result in either avoidance or panic attacks.15

Search Terms

The keywords used were: psychosocial; psychologic; depression; psychiatric comorbidity; posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); and anxiety. These keywords were used with “OR” and “AND” with the following conditions: orofacial pain; temporomandibular joint pain/disorder; trigeminal neuralgia; trigeminal nerve injury; burning mouth syndrome; persistent dento-alveolar pain; atypical facial pain; and atypical odontalgia.

Outcome Measures

The objective of the present review was to investigate studies on anxiety and depression in patients with COFP and, more specifically, to identify the reported prevalence of anxiety and depression in affected individuals and their relationships with pain chronicity, pain severity, and demographic factors, such as gender and age.

Data Extraction

The initial search yielded 5,024 articles. Suitable articles were identified (n = 252) during title and abstract screening through the process of selection and filtration. Duplicates were removed. Full-text screening of 134 articles was carried out. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 118 articles were selected (Fig 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Flow diagram of study selection.

Initially, to establish their relevance for the review, one reviewer (A.K.) read the title and abstract of each article. After reading the abstract and ensuring that the article provided the necessary information for the review, the entire article was retrieved and read to further establish whether it fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Any study that was unclear about its inclusion criteria was read by the second (J.S.), third (L.M.), and fourth (T.R.) reviewers. After discussion, consensus was reached for all articles included. The bibliographies of the selected articles were also manually searched for additional studies.

The studies on COFP were categorized according to classification (diagnostic) system: the International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 (ICHD-3),17 the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD),18 and the IASP and American Academy of Orofacial Pain (AAOP).19,20 All studies were assessed on the following parameters: type of study, type of pain under investigation, sample size, psychologic scale used, psychologic comorbidities under investigation, the reported prevalence of psychologic comorbidities in each study, and the year of publication.

Meta-analyses were not considered appropriate, as there was an insufficient number of studies with a required level of homogeneity in study design, COFP population under study, and depression/anxiety scale or method of assessment used.21

Risk of Bias Assessment

This study used a method previously employed in systematic reviews of oral conditions to assess the risk of bias (RoB).2224 Studies were evaluated on the following criteria: (1) Study group characteristics (whether consecutive or unselected patient selection was performed); (2) presence of an appropriate control group (sex- and age-matched); (3) prospective study or data collected purposely for the specific study; and (4) whether participants or the investigators were blinded if appropriate according to the study design.

The criteria were assessed as met, unmet, or unclear for each. Three factors were used to assess the study’s overall validity: (1) There is a low risk of bias because all of the criteria were met according to the study design; (2) There is a high risk of bias because at least one criterion was unmet or three criteria were unclear; (3) There is a moderate risk of bias because one or two criteria were unclear, or one or two criteria were not applicable according to study design. All four reviewers independently evaluated the RoB, and all studies were distributed equally among the reviewers.

Results

The defining characteristics and key findings of the included studies are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Study Characteristics

Study, y (country) Study type Orofacial pain group types and sample sizes, n No. of patients (% gender distribution) Psychosocial scales Psychologic comorbidity Prevalence, % Reference no.
1. Adamo et al, 2020 (Italy) Cross-sectional BMS: 52 52 (M: 19, F: 81) HARS
HDRS
Anxiety
Depression

102
2. Bäck et al, 2020 (Sweden) Cross-sectional TMD with sev pain/TMD with headache cases: 82
Controls: 977
1,059 (F: 100) HADS Anxiety
Depression
Cases: 51.2
Controls: 21.2
Cases: 32.9
Controls: 7.2
71
3. Chang et al, 2019 (China) Retrospective cross-sectional TN cases: 45
Controls: 61
106 (M: 44, F: 56) HARS
HDRS
Anxiety
Depression

110
4. Godazandeh et al, 2019 (UK) Cross-sectional TN: 68
TN with MS: 26
94 (TN M: 21, F: 79; TN with MS M: 23, F: 77) HADS Anxiety (Mild/Sev)
Depression (Mild/Sev)
TN: 63.3 (43.3/20.0)
TN with MS: 53.9 (23.1/30.8)
TN: 33.3 (15.0/18.3)
TN with MS: 56.0 (16.0/40.0)
111
5. Heinskou et al, 2019 (Denmark) Prospective observational TN after medicine intervention: 103
TN after surgical intervention: 50
103 (M: 35, F: 65) Self-report survey Anxiety and/or depression TN after medicine intervention: 14.6
TN after surgical intervention: 14.0
109
6. Huttunen et al, 2019 (Finland) Randomized controlled trial TMD: 80 80 (M: 23, F: 77) RDC/TMD Depression (Mod/Sev) B 42.5 (27.5/15.0) 72
7. Jivnani et al, 2019 (India) Cross-sectional TMD pain and headaches: 15
TMD pain with disc displacement:19
No TMD: 34
68 (M: 49, F: 51) HADS Anxiety (BClin/Clin)
Depression (BClin/Clin)
TMD pain and headaches: 47.0 (27.0/20.0)
TMD pain with disc displacement: 53.0 (42.0/11.0)
No TMD: 6.0 (6.0/0.0)
TMD pain and headaches: 66.0 (13.0/53.0)
TMD pain with disc displacement: 63.0 (26.0/37.0)
No TMD: 24.0 (18.0/6.0)
73
8. Le Bris et al, 2019 (France) Retrospective cohort BMS: 38 38 (M: 16, F: 84) Self-report
questionnaire
Depression symptoms 50 101
9. Lira et al, 2019 (Brazil) Cross-sectional TMD cases: 92
Controls: 37
129 (F: 100) HADS Anxiety
Depression

74
10. Melek et al, 2019 (UK) Cross-sectional Ne:
TN: 40
PTTN: 97
137 (M: 30, F: 70) GAD-7
PHQ
Anxiety (Clin)
Depression (Mild-Mod/Mod-Sev to Sev)
TN: 38.5
PTTN: 34.4
TN: 53.6 (35.7/17.9)
PTTN: 35.9 (25.0/10.9)
125
11. Yang et al, 2019
China
Cross-sectional BMS cases: 30
Controls: 18
48 (M: 17, F: 83) ZSAS
ZSDS
Anxiety (Mild)
Depression (Mild)
Depression (Mod)
BMS: 30
BMS: 50
BMS: 36.6
100
12. Adamo et al, 2018 (Italy) Cross-sectional BMS: 200
Controls: 200
400 (M: 17, F: 83) HARS
HDRS
Anxiety (Mild-Mod)
Anxiety (Mod-Sev)
Depression (Mild)
Depression (Mod-Sev)
BMS: 27
BMS: 18
BMS: 32
BMS: 34
99
13. Daher et al, 2018 (Brazil) Cross-sectional TMD A: 10
TMD MP: 15
Controls: 10
35 (M: 20, F: 80) HADS Anxiety 75
14. Di Stasio et al, 2018 (Italy) Cross-sectional BMS cases: 25
Controls: 24
49 (M: 13, F: 87) STAI
HDRS
Anxiety
Depression

98
15. Fernandes Azevedo et al, 2018 (Brazil) Cross-sectional TMD cases: 38
Controls: 67
105 STAI St Anxiety (Mod)
Tr Anxiety (Mod)
TMD: 39.5
No TMD: 29.9
TMD: 36.8
No TMD: 46.3
76
16. Lee and Chon, 2020 (Korea) Cross-sectional BMS with sleep problems: 15
BMS without sleep problems: 10
25 (F: 100) SCL-90-R Anxiety
Depression

97
17. Miura et al, 2018 (Japan) Retrospective cross-sectional AO: 383 383 (M: 15, F: 85) DSM-V
ZSDS
Anxiety
Depression
10.1
15.4
133
18. Moura et al, 2018 (Brazil) Case-control BMS cases: 15
Controls: 15
30 (M: 20, F: 80) BAI
BDI
Anxiety (Mild/Mod)
Anxiety (Mod)
Depression BMS (Mod/Sev)
BMS: 16.6/33.3
Controls: 13.3
BMS: 16.7/8.3
Controls: 0.0/0.0
96
19. Natu et al, 2018 (Singapore) Cross-sectional No TMD: 142
Mild TMD: 79
Mod TMD: 23
244 (M: 16, F: 84) DASS-21 Anxiety
Depression

77
20. Nazeri et al, 2018 (Iran) Case-control TMD MP and migraines: 50
TMD MP: 25
Migraines: 15
Controls: 38
128 (M: 24, F: 76) HADS Anxiety and/or depression TMD MP and migraines: 90.0
TMD MP: 24.0
Migraines: 66.7
Controls: 31.6
78
21. Paulino et al, 2018 (Brazil) Cross-sectional TMD cases: 171
Controls: 132
303 (M: 31, F: 69) HADS Anxiety
Depression
TMD: 46.8
No TMD: 26.5
TMD: 10.5
No TMD: 9.1
79
22. Reiter et al, 2018 (Israel) Cross-sectional TMD 163 (M: 25, F: 75) GAD-7
PHQ-9
Anxiety (Mild/Mod/Sev)
Depression (Mild/Mod/Sev)
19.6/8.0/4.9
26.4/12.3/8.0
80
23. Sikora et al, 2018 (Croatia) Cross-sectional BMS cases: 43
Controls: 50
93 (M: 18, F: 82) STAI
BDI
Anxiety
Depression

95
24. Sruthi et al, 2018 (India) Cross-sectional TMD MP: 27
TMD JP: 26
TMD mixed: 23
Controls: 24
100 (M: 46, F: 54) DASS-42 Anxiety
Depression

81
25. Tu et al, 2018 (Japan) Cross-sectional AO: 272
AO and BMS: 83
355 (M: 12, F: 88) ZSDS Depression 124
26. Yoo et al, 2018 (Korea) Cross-sectional BMS cases: 50
Controls: 50
100 (M: 42, F: 58) SCL-90-R Anxiety
Depression

94
27. Mitsikostas et al, 2017 (Greece) Case series BMS: 8 8 (F: 100%) HARS
HDRS
Anxiety (Mild-Mod)
Anxiety (Mod-Sev)
Dep (Mod-Sev)
50.0
12.5
100
93
28. Naikoo et al, 2017 (India) Case-control TMD cases: 100
Controls: 100
220 (M: 36, F: 64) HADS Anxiety
Depression
TMD: 53.0
No TMD: 21.0
82
29. Reiter et al, 2017 (Israel) Cross-sectional TMD:
RDC: 142
DC: 157
299 (M: 24, F: 76) RDC/TMD
DC/TMD (GAD-7,
PHQ-9)
RDC Anxiety (Mod/Sev)
RDC Depression (Mod/Sev)
DC Anxiety (Mod/Sev)
DC Depression (Mod/Sev)
51.4 (27.9/23.5)
54.2 (29.6/24.6)
10.2 (7.6/2.6)
17.8 (9.6/8.2)
83
30. Su et al, 2017 (China) Cross-sectional TMD low pain intensity n = 156
TMD high pain intensity n = 164
320 (M: 22, F: 78) GAD-7
PHQ-9
Anxiety (Mild/Mod/Sev)
Depression (Mild/Mod/Sev)
Low pain: 23/8.9/2.5
High pain: 9.5/16.4/11.5
Low pain: 31.4/7.0/3.2
High pain: 26.8/15.8/17.7
84
31. Tan et al, 2017 (Malaysia) Cross-sectional TN: 75 75 (M: 31, F: 69) HADS Anxiety
Depression
41.3
24.0
108
32. Tournavitis et al, 2017 (Greece) Cross-sectional TMD: 75 75 (M: 48, F: 52) STAI
CES-D
Anxiety
Depression

85
33. van Selms et al, 2017 (Netherlands) Cross-sectional TMD cases: 268
Controls: 254
522 (M: 14, F: 86) GAD-7
PHQ-15
Anxiety
Depression

86
34. Yeung et al, 2017 (UK) Cross-sectional TMD: 162 162 (M: 20, F: 80) GAD-7
PHQ-9
Anxiety (Mild/Mod/Sev)
Depression (Mild/Mod/Sev)
27/12/8
27/20/14
87
35. Zakrzewska et al, 2017 (UK) Cross-sectional TN no IMP: 155
TN with IMP: 32
TN with AN: 38
225 (M: 37, F: 63) HADS Anxiety (BClin/Clin)
Depression (BClin/Clin)
TN no IMP: 46.4 (21.5/25.2)
TN with IMP: 40.7 (11.1/29.6)
TN with AN: 77.8 (50.0/27.8)
TN no IMP: 30.6 (15.3/15.3)
TN with IMP: 29.6 (18.5/11.1)
TN with AN: 55.5 (22.2/33.3)
107
36. Bertoli and de Leeuw, 2016 (USA) Cross-sectional TMD: 1,241 1,241 (M: 12, F: 88) SCL-90-R Anxiety
Depression
28.9
30.4
70
37. Braud and Boucher, 2016 (France) Cross-sectional BMS: 18 18 (M: 6, F: 94) HADS Anxiety
Depression
38.8
33.3
139
38. das Neves de Araújo Lima et al, 2016 (Brazil) Cross-sectional BMS: 64
SOB: 99
163 (M: 19, F: 81) BAI
BDI
Anxiety (Mild/Mod/Sev)
Depression (Mild-Mod/Mod-Sev)
BMS: 30.0/6.7/13.3
SOB: 20.0/10.0/0
BMS: 53.1/28.1
SOB: 16.1/6.0
138
39. Davies et al, 2016 (UK) Cross-sectional BMS: 30
Other oral conditions: 11
41 (M: 12, F: 88) Customized questionnaire and clinical interviews Anxiety
Depression

164
40. Duraçoğlu et al, 2016 (Turkey) Cross-sectional TMD: 273 273 (M: 22, F: 78) HADS Anxiety
Depression
Anxiety and/or depression
31.1
40.7
49.8
67
41. Mousavi et al, 2016 (USA) Cross-sectional TN: 21 21 (M: 14, F: 86) DSM-IV Anxiety (Diag)
Depression (Diag)
52.3
42.8
137
42. Patil et al, 2016 (India) Cross-sectional Chronic TMD cases: 60
Controls: 60
120 (M: 25, F: 75) BDI Depression (BClin/Mod/Sev) Cases: 30.0 (13.3/13.3/3.3)
Controls: 10.0 (6.7/3.3/0.0)
68
43. Sevrain et al, 2016 (France) Retrospective BMS: 35 35 (M: 9, F: 91) HADS Anxiety
Depression
54.3
25.7
92
44. Tang et al, 2016 (China) Cross-sectional TN: 167 167 (M: 40.7, F: 59.3) BAI
BDI
Anxiety
Depression
20.4
72.5
134
45. Visscher et al, 2016 (Netherlands) Retrospective TMD: 112 112 (M: 13, F: 87) SCL-90 Depression 25.8 69
46. Al-Havaz et al, 2015 (Iran) Cross-sectional TMD: 171 171 (M: 43, F: 57) RDC/TMD Depression (Mod-Sev) TMD: 7.0 62
47. Brailo and
Zakrzewska, 2015 (UK)
Cross-sectional TN: 48
TMD: 112
CIFP: 85
245 (M: 24, F: 76) HADS Anxiety (BClin/Clin)
Depression (BClin/Clin)
TN: 39.3 (17.9/21.4)
TMD: 55.7 (26.2/29.5)
CIFP: 38.5 (15.4/23.1)
TN: 32.1 (25.0/7.1)
TMD: 32.8 (19.7/13.1)
CIFP: 42.3 (11.5/30.8)
122
48. Kotiranta et al, 2015 (Finland) Cross-sectional TMD: 399 399 (M: 17, F: 83) RDC/TMD (SCL-90-R) Anxiety
Depression

63
49. Lei et al, 2015 (China) Cross-sectional TMD:
MFP: 128
No MFP: 382
510 (M: 24, F: 76) DASS-21 Anxiety
Depression
TMD: 36.5
MFP: 62.5
No MFP: 27.7
TMD: 17.6
MFP: 31.3
No MFP: 13.1
64
50. Lopez-Jornet et al,
2015 (Spain)
Cross-sectional BMS cases: 70
Controls: 70
140 (M: 9, F: 91) HADS Anxiety
Depression

91
51. Majumder et al, 2015 (India) Cross-sectional TMD cases: 311
Controls: 689
1,000 (M: 45, F: 55) HADS Anxiety and/or Depression TMD: 66.2
No TMD: 31.1
65
52. Marino et al, 2015
Italy
Case-control BMS cases: 58
Controls: 58
116 (M: 21, F: 79) HARS
MADRS
Anxiety (Mild-Mod/Mod-Sev)
Depression (Mild/Mod/Sev)
BMS: 80.7 (31.6/49.1)
BMS: 49.1 (47.3/1.8/0)
136
53. Reiter et al, 2015 (Israel) Retrospective observational Acute TMD: 49
Chronic TMD: 139
207 (M: 24, F: 76) RDC/TMD (SCL-90-R) Anxiety (Mod/Sev)
Depression (Mod/Sev)
TMD: 54.1 (29.5/24.6)
Acute: 44.9 (28.6/16.3)
Chronic: 58.3 (30.2/28.1)
TMD: 56.0 (33.3/22.7)
Acute: 40.8 (26.5/14.3
Chronic: 61.2 (36.0/25.2)
66
54. Tokura et al, 2015 (Japan) Cross-sectional BMS cases: 65
Controls: 116
181 (M: 19, F: 82) BDI Depression (Diag MDD) BMS: 14 135
55. Wu et al, 2015 (Korea) Retrospective cohort TN cases: 3,273
Controls: 13,092
16,365 (M: 62, F: 38) ICD-9 CM Anxiety (Diag)
Depression (Diag)
TN: Cases: 1.8
Controls: 0.60
TN: Cases: 2.2
Controls: 0.79
106
56. Calixtre et al, 2014 (Brazil) Longitudinal TMD: 19 19 (M: 5, F: 94) HADS Anxiety
Depression

54
57. Cioffi et al, 2014 (Italy) Cross-sectional TMD/migraine:
TMD MP: 676
Migraine: 39
TMD MP + migraine: 66
781 (M: 22, F: 78) RDC/TMD (SCL-90) Depression 121
58. Davis et al, 2014 (USA) Cross-sectional TMD: 50 50 (M: 8, F: 92) Psych Diag-(MR)
STAI
Anxiety (Diag)
Depression (Diag)
30.0
18.0
55
59. Gerrits et al, 2014 (Netherlands) Longitudinal cohort OFP: 13 614 (M: 39, F: 61) DSM-IV
CIDI version 2.1
Anxiety
Depression

131
60. Komiyama et al,
2014 (Japan)
Cross-sectional TMD: 1,437 1,437 (M: 29, F: 71) RDC/TMD Depression 56
61. Minghelli et al, 2014 (Portugal) Cross-sectional TMD cases: 633
Controls: 860
1,493 (M: 32, F: 68) HADS Anxiety or depression Cases: 61.4
Controls: 38.6
57
62. Reissmann et al,
2014 (Germany)
Case-control TMD cases: 320
Controls: 888
1,208 (M: 36, F: 64) STAI
RDC/TMD
State Anxiety (Mod/Sev)
Depression (Mod/Sev)
Cases: 56.6 (25.3/31.3)
Controls: 32.2 (22.2/10)
Cases: 45.9 (20.6/25.3)
Controls: 38.5 (16.9/21.6)
58
63. Smriti et al, 2014 (India) Cross-sectional TMD cases: 27
Controls: 123
150 (M: 31, F: 69) ZSAS Anxiety (Mild-Mod) TMD: 25.9
No TMD: 6.5
59
64. Sood et al, 2014 (India) Cross-sectional TMD cases: 104
Controls: 396
400 (M: 25, F: 75) HADS Anxiety
Depression

60
65. Vasudeva et al, 2014 (India) Case-control TMD cases: 255
Controls: 250
505 (M: 64, F: 36) HADS Anxiety (BClin/Clin) TMD 55.9 (45.0/10.9)
No TMD: 20.4 (19.2/0.8)
61
66. Castelli et al, 2013 (Italy) Case-control TMD (chronic MP) cases: 45
Controls: 45
90 (F: 100) BDI
STAI-Y1
Anxiety
Depression

51
67. Chen et al, 2013 (USA) Case-control,
secondary analysis
TMD:
TMD cases, no pain: 14
TMD cases with chronic pain: 145
Controls: 131
290 (F: 100) STAI
SCL-90-R
Anxiety
Depression

52
68. Ligthart et al, 2013 (Netherlands) Longitudinal cohort OFP:
Facial pain: 401 (at 2-y follow-up)
2,981 (total); (M: 34, F: 66) BAI
IDS-SR
Anxiety
Depression

129
69. Ozdemir-Karatas et
al, 2013 (Turkey)
Cross-sectional TMD: 104 104 (M: 38, F: 62) RDC/TMD (SCL-90-R) Depression 53
70. Sipilä et al, 2013 (Finland) Longitudinal cohort Chronic OFP:
Cases: 162
Controls: 200
Follow-up: 63
Follow-up controls: 85
Baseline: 362
Follow-up: 148
SCL-25 Depression symptoms
Depression (Diag)
Baseline cases: 17.5
Controls: 7.0
Follow-up cases: 6.3
Controls: 1.2
130
71. Smith et al, 2013 (UK) Cross-sectional Ne: PPTN: 89 89 (M: 32, F: 68) HADS Anxiety (BClin/Clin)
Depression (BClin/Clin)
51.2 (17.5/33.7)
29.8 (14.3/15.5)
105
72. de Lucena et al, 2012 (Brazil) Longitudinal population-based prospective TMD (two time periods; T1 and T2):
Cases: 99
Controls: 54
153 (M: 46, F: 54) HADS Anxiety
Depression
Cases: T1 = 61.6/T2 = 60.6
Controls: T1 = 22.2/T2 = 37.0
Cases: T1 = 16.2/T2 = 26.3
Controls: T1 = 5.6/T2 = 14.8
45
73. de Souza et al, 2012 (Brazil) Cross-sectional BMS cases: 30
Controls: 31
61 (M: 3, F: 97) MINI-Plus
HDRS
BDI
STAI
Anxiety (Diag)
Depression (Diag)
Cases: 36.7
Controls: 9.7
Cases: 46.7
Controls: 12.9
89
74. Diniz et al, 2012 (Brazil) Longitudinal cohort Baseline TMD: 20
Controls: 35
Follow-up TMD: 28
Follow-up controls: 27
55 BAI Anxiety (Mild/Mod-Sev) Baseline TMD: 65.0 (55.0/10)
Follow-up TMD: 64.3 (18.6/39.3)
46
75. Guarda-Nardini et al, 2012 (Italy) Cross-sectional Acute TMD: 51
Chronic TMD: 59
110 (M: 19, F: 81) HARS
HDRS
SCL-90-R
Anxiety
Depression (Mod-Sev)

TMD (acute and chronic): 48.0 (30–18)
47
76. Kindler et al, 2012 (Germany) Prospective cohort TMD:
TMD JP: 122
No TMD JP: 2,884
TMD MP: 50
No TMD MP: 2,984
6,040 (M: 49, F: 51) CID-S Anxiety symptoms
Depression symptoms
JP: 64.8
No JP: 47.1
MP: 78.0
No MP: 47.3
JP: 49.2
No JP: 28.3
MP: 46.0
No MP: 29.0
48
77. Komiyama et al,
2012 (Japan)
Cross-sectional Ne:
BMS: 282 (acute: 169,
chronic: 113)
TN n = 83 (acute: 43, chronic: 40)
365 (M: 20, F: 80) RDC/TMD (SCL-90-R) Depression 120
78. Rodrigues et al, 2012 (Brazil) Cross-sectional TMD:
TMD pain: 54
TMD no pain: 129
183 (M: 42, F: 58) RDC/TMD Depression (Mod/Sev) TMD: 41.5 (30.2/11.3) 49
79. Schiavone et al,
2012 (Italy)
Cross-sectional BMS:
Chronic BMS: 53
Controls: 51
104 (M: 30, F: 70) HDRS
STAI-Y1/Y2
Anxiety
Depression

90
80. Schwahn et al, 2012 (Germany) Cross-sectional TMD: 3,904 3,904 (M: 50, F: 50) CID-S Depression 50
81. Wan et al, 2012 (Hong Kong) Cross-sectional OFP:
CD: 200
IE: 200
400 GHQ-12 Psychologic distress CD: 4
IE: 11.0
128
82. Celić et al, 2011 (Croatia) Cross-sectional Acute TMD: 126
Chronic TMD: 28
154 (M: 24, F: 76) RDC/TMD (SCL-90-R) Depression (Sev) TMD (acute and chronic): 19.5 40
83. Dworkin, 2011 (Italy, Israel, Amsterdam) Cross-sectional TMD: 1,149 1,149 (M: 20, F: 80) SCL-90-R Depression (Mod-Sev) 45.4 41
84. Gustin et al, 2011 (Australia) Case-control Ne/TMD:
TNP: 24
TMD: 21
Controls: 38
83 (M: 24, F: 76) STAI
BDI
Anxiety
Depression

16
85. Mačianskytė et al, 2011 (Lithuania) Cross-sectional Ne/IP:
TN + Chronic facial pain: 30
ATFP: 30
60 (M: 15, F: 85) CAS
BDI
Anxiety
Depression (Mod/Sev)

TN: 76.7 (46.7/30.0)
ATFP: 0
118
86. Monteiro et al, 2011 (Brazil) Cross-sectional Chronic TMD: 49
Controls: 101
150 (M: 78, F: 22) STAI State anxiety
Trait anxiety

42
87. Taiminen et al, 2011 (Finland) Cross-sectional Ne/IP:
BMS: 40
ATFP: 23
63 (M: 10, F: 90) SCID-I Anxiety (Diag)
Depression (Diag)
BMS: 47.5
ATFP: 30.4
BMS: 35
ATFP: 26
119
88. van Seventer et al,
2011 (UK, Netherlands, Canada)
Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial Ne (posttraumatic peripheral
neuropathic pain):
TN: unknown
254 (M: 49, F: 51) HADS Anxiety
Depression

104
89. Velly et al, 2011 (USA) Prospective cohort TMD chronic pain onset (GCPS I): 261
Pain prognosis (GCPS II-IV): 309
Baseline: 570 (M: 15, F: 85)
BDI Depression (Mod/Sev), baseline TMD: 10.3
GCPS I: 7.0
GCPS II-IV: 14.0
43
90. Xu et al, 2011 (China) Cross-sectional TMD: 162 162 (F: 100) SCL-90-R Anxiety
Depression
7.4
11.7
44
91. Bakhtiari et al, 2010 (Iran) Cross-sectional BMS:
BMS: 50
Controls: 50
100 (M: 17, F: 83) CAS State anxiety
Trait anxiety

103
92. Giannakopoulos
et al, 2010 (Germany)
Case-control TMD:
MP: 88
JP: 43
NonTMD facial pain: 45
Controls n = 46
222 (M: 27, F: 73) HADS Anxiety
Depression

35
93. Kim et al, 2010 (Korea) Cross-sectional TMD:
TMD trauma: 34
TMD no trauma: 340
374 (M: 29, F: 71) SCL-90-R Anxiety
Depression

116
94. Lajnert et al, 2010 (Croatia) Cross-sectional Acute TMD: 30
Chronic TMD: 30
Controls: 30
90 (F: 100) RDC/TMD Depression (Mod/Sev) Acute: 52.7 (28.0/24.7)
Chronic: 77.4 (30.0/6.0)
Controls: 36.0 (30.0/6.0)
36
95. Manfredini et al,
2010a (Italy)
Cross-sectional TMD: 11 111 (M: 19, F: 81) RDC/TMD (SCL-90-R) Depression (Mod/Sev) 41.4 (1.8/39.6) 37
96. Manfredini et al,
2010b (Italy, Israel,
Netherlands)
Cross-sectional Acute TMD: 293
Chronic TMD: 856
1,149 (M: 20, F: 80) RDC/TMD (SCL-90) Depression (Mod/Sev) Acute: 45.0 (23.1/21.9)
Chronic: 47.7 (25.1/22.6)
38
97. McMillan et al, 2010 (Hong Kong) Cross-sectional, case-control OFP cases: 200
Controls: 200
400 (M: 36, F: 64) SCL-90 Depression Cases: 31.0
Controls: 11.0
127
98. Pesqueira et al, 2010 (Brazil) Cross-sectional, case-control TMD cases: 61
Controls: 89
150 STAI
RDC/TMD
State anxiety
Trait anxiety

39
99. Takenoshita et al,
2010 (Japan)
Cross-sectional
IASP
Ne/IP:
BMS: 125
AO: 37
162 (M: 13, F: 87) SDS
Psych Diag
MR
Depressive tendencies
Depression (Diag)
Anxiety (Diag)
BMS: 32.1
AO: 33.3
BMS: 32.0
AO: 21.6
BMS: 9.6
AO: 10.8
117
100. Bonjardim et al,
2009 (Brazil)
Cross-sectional TMD cases: 98
Controls: 98
196 (M: 49, F: 51) HADS Anxiety (BClin/Clin)
Depression (BClin)
TMD: 43.9 (26.5/17.3)
No TMD: 24.5 (21.4/3.1)
TMD: 6.6
No TMD: 3.1
31
101. Choi et al, 2009 (Korea) Retrospective Ne/PIFP/TMD:
TN: 8
Ne: 9
PIFP: 8
TMD: 138 (TMD MP: 73, TMD JP: 24, TMD MP + JP: 41)
163 (M: 40, F: 60) HADS Anxiety
Depression

115
102. Gao et al, 2009 (China) Case-control BMS cases: 87
Controls: 82
169 (M: 24, F: 76) SAS
SDS
Anxiety
Depression

165
103. Licini et al, 2009 (Italy) Cross-sectional TMD: 308 308 (M: 25, F: 75) RDC/TMD Depression (Mod/Sev) 65.7 (13.3/52.6) 32
104. Macfarlane et al,
2009 (UK)
Prospective cohort TMD:
OFP in young adults: 78
337 (M: 43, F: 57) CES-D
PSS
Depression OFP: 33.3
No OFP: 18.9
33
105. Stavrianos et al, 2009 (UK) Prospective cohort TMD: 22 22 (M: 36, F: 64) IAS Heart phobia
Cancer phobia

34
106. Streffer et al, 2009 (Switzerland) Cross-sectional OF: 102 102 (M: 22, F: 78) HADS Anxiety (BClin/Clin)
Depression (BClin/Clin)
51.7 (33/18.7)
32.6 (16.9/15.7)
126
107. Baad-Hansen et al,
2008 (Denmark)
Cross-sectional TMD: 41
AO: 46
87 (M: 17, F: 83) SCL-90-R Depression 113
108. Ballegaard et al, 2008 (Denmark) Cross-sectional TMD/headache:
TMD with headache: 55
Headache without TMD: 44
99 (M: 23, F: 76) RDC/TMD Depression (Mod-Sev) TMD with headache: 70.9
Headache without TMD: 34.1
123
109. Buljan et al, 2008 (Croatia) Cross-sectional BMS cases: 42
Controls: 78
120 (M: 39, F: 61) BAI
SDS
Anxiety
Depression

88
110. Castro et al, 2008 (Brazil) Cross-sectional TN: 15
TMD: 15
30 (M 27, F: 73) HADS Anxiety
Depression

114
111. Lee et al, 2008 (China) Cross-sectional TMD: 87 87 (M: 12, F: 88) RDC/TMD Depression (Mod/Sev) 42.5 (26.4/16.1) 29
112. Reissmann et al,
2008 (Germany)
Cross-sectional TMD: 225 225 (M: 14, F: 86) RDC/TMD Depression 47.6 (21.8–25.7) 30
113. Bertoli et al, 2007 (USA) Retrospective TMD: 445 445 (M: 9, F: 91) SCL-90-R Depression 26
114. John et al, 2007 (Germany) Cross-sectional Chronic TMD: 416 416 (M: 21, F: 79) RDC/TMD Axis II Depression (Mod/Sev) 46.2 (19.7/26.5) 27
115. List et al, 2007 (Sweden) Case-control AO cases: 46
Controls: 35
81 (M: 22, F: 78) SCL-90-R Depression (Mod/Sev) Cases: 74 (26.0/48.0)
Controls: 54 (37.0/17.0)
132
116. Mongini et al, 2007 (Italy) Cross-sectional TMD/OFP:
TMD MP: 462
TMD A: 70,
Ne (TN + PNe): 68
FPD: 49
649 (M: 22, F: 78)
SCID-DSM-IV Anxiety (Diag)
Depression (Diag)
TMD MP: 33.5
TMD A: 15.7
Ne: 16.2
FPD: 30.6
TMD MP: 22.3
TMD A: 15.7
Ne: 10.3
FPD: 44.9
112
117. Nifosi et al, 2007 (Italy) Cross-sectional TMD MFP: 19
TMD JP: 26
TMD MFP + JP: 18
63 (M: 25, F: 75) SCID-DSM-IV
HARS
HDRS
SCL-90-R
Anxiety (Diag)
Depression (Diag)
Anxiety and depression symptoms
TMD: 15.9
TMD: 20.6
28
118. GaldÓn et al, 2006 (Spain) Cross-sectional TMD MP: 58
TMD A: 56
114 (M: 11, F: 89) BSI-18 Anxiety
General distress

25

Note: Only percentages of psychologic functioning impact of orofacial pain conditions were included (at the decimal point level presented in study papers).

AN = autonomic symptoms; AO = atypical odontalgia; ATFP = atypical facial pain; BAI = Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI); BClin = borderline clinically significant; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; BMS = Burning Mouth Syndrome; BSI-18 = Brief Symptom Inventory-18; CAS = Covi Anxiety Scale; CD = community dwellers; CES-D = Centre for Epidemiological studies Scale; CIDI = Composite International Diagnostic Interview; CID-S = Composite International Diagnostic-Screener; CIFP = chronic idiopathic facial pain; Clin = clinically significant (Clin); DASS-21 = Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale; DC/TMD = Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders; Diag = diagnosis; DSM-IV = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; FPD = facial pain disorder; GAD-7 = Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire; GCPS = Graded Chronic Pain Scale (grades I to IV); GHQ = General Health Questionnaire; HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HARS = Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; HDRS = Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; IAS = Illness Attitude Scale (IAS); ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision; IDS-SR = Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology; IE = institutionalized elderly; IMP = intermittent pain; IP = idiopathic pain; JP = TMD joint pain; MADRS = Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MDD = major depressive disorder; MFP/MP = myofascial pain/TMD muscle pain; MINI-Plus = International Neuropsychiatric Interview; MR = medical record; MS = multiple sclerosis; Ne = neuropathic pain; OFP = orofacial pain; PHQ = Patient Health Questionnaire; PIFP = persistent idiopathic facial pain; PNe = persistent neuropathic pain; PPTNI = painful posttraumatic nerve injury; PSS = Perceived Stress Scale; Psych Diag = psychiatric diagnosis; RDC/TMD = Research Diagnostic Criteria/Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II questionnaire; SAS/SDS = self-rating anxiety/depression scale; SCID = Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; STAI (Y1/Y2) = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form 1/Form 2); SCL-25 = Symptom Checklist-25; SCL-90-R = Symptom Checklist-90-Revised; SOB = secondary oral burning; TMD A = arthrogenous TMD; TNP = trigeminal neuropathic pain; TN = trigeminal neuralgia; ZSAS = Zung Self Rating Anxiety Scale; ZSDS = Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale.

Participant Characteristics

Diagnosis

The majority of included studies (n = 63) focused exclusively on TMD pain2567,6987,116,121,123 and its impact on psychologic wellbeing (ie, anxiety/depression). Thirty-three studies recruited patients with a single neuropathic pain condition (23 burning mouth syndrome [BMS],88103,120,135,136,138,139,164,165 2 posttraumatic neuropathic pain [PTNP],104,105 and 8 trigeminal neuralgia [TN]).106111,134,137 Eleven studies compared patients with various types of OFP conditions16,112115,117,119,120,122,124,125; these included studies comparing BMS to TN; PTNP/TN to TMDs; idiopathic continuous orofacial neuropathic pain to TMDs; TN to TMDs; TMDs to migraine and headaches (ie, neurovascular pain); TN to atypical facial pain, hereby referred to as persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP); and BMS to atypical odontalgia (AO), hereby referred to as persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain (PDAP). Seven studies focused on COFP in general (where pain types were not specified),56,126131 and 2 recruited patients with AO.132,133 Sample sizes across all studies ranged from 8 to 3,904 participants.

Gender

With the exception of a clinical trial on PTNP patients, where gender was evenly distributed,104 mixed-gender studies involving clinical COFP populations employed samples that predominantly comprised women (range: 60% to 97%), with the exception of two studies where women were in the minority (36% and 38%).61,106 Eight studies included women (TMDs and BMS) only.36,44,51,52,71,74,93,97 Aside from a community survey of elderly people (77% women),128 studies recruiting patients from the (general) health care population tended to have a small majority of women (range: 51% to 64%).31,48,58,131 The age range of the study population across most studies was 18 to 80 years, except for one where the upper limit was 100 years.118

Study Design

A total of 86 studies were cross-sectional in design, 25,2732,34,3642,44,47,49,50,53,5557,59,60,6265,6771,7377,7981,8391,94,95,97100,102,103,105,107,108,110114,116124,126128,133,134 and 11 were longitudinal prospective studies. 33,43,45,46,48,54,109,111,129131 Ten were designed as case-control,16,35,51,52,58,61,78,82,96,132 8 were retrospective, 26,66,92,101,106,110,115,133 1 was a case series,93 and 2 were clinical trials.72,104 An exception was made to include the 2 clinical trials, as these studies measured the postintervention association between the level of pain experienced and the degree of observed anxiety and depression.

Study Characteristics

A total of 67 studies 16,28,31,35,44,45,47,48,51,52,54,55,57,58,60,6467,70,71,73,74,77,79100,102,104112,114116,118,119,122,125,126,129,131,133 investigated the association of COFP with anxiety and depression, 9 studies25,39,42,46,59,61,75,76,103 with anxiety only, 31 studies26,27,29,30,32,33,3638,40,41,43,49,50,53,56,62,63,68,69,72,101,113,117,120,121,123,124,127,130,132 with depression only, 1 with psychologic distress, 128 and 1 with hypochondriacal beliefs.34 Seventy-seven2733,3638,4049,55,5762,6473,76,7880,8284,87,89,92,93,96,99101,105109,111,112,117119,122,123,125130,132,133,135139 provided prevalence data for anxiety and/or depression, although 3 studies did not report prevalence rates separately for COFP and non-OFP groups. 42,60,129 Most of the research was carried out in Europe (n = 56), followed by Asia (n = 38), Latin America (n = 15), the USA (n = 6), and Australia (n = 1), while 2 spanned across continents. There were 33 (28.0%) low RoB studies and 27 (22.9%) high RoB studies; almost half of the studies (n = 58 [49.2%]) had a moderate risk of bias (Table 2).

Table 2.

Risk of Bias of Individual Studies

Study Study design Study group Control group Prospective design Blinded Cumulative risk of bias Reference no.
1. Adamo et al, 2020 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 102
2. Bäck et al, 2020 Cross-sectional Unmet Met Met N/A High 71
3. Chang et al, 2019 Retrospective cross-sectional Met Met Unmet N/A High 110
4. Godazandeh et al, 2019 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 111
5. Heinskou et al, 2019 Prospective observational Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 109
6. Huttunen et al, 2019 Randomized controlled trial Met Met Met N/A Low 72
7. Jivnani et al, 2019 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 73
8. Le Bris et al, 2019 Retrospective cohort Met N/A Unclear N/A Moderate 101
9. Lira et al, 2019 Cross-sectional Unclear Unmet Met N/A High 74
10. Melek et al, 2019 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 125
11. Yang et al, 2019 Cross-sectional Met Unclear Met N/A Moderate 100
12. Adamo et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 99
13. Daher et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Unmet Unclear Met N/A High 75
14. Di Stasio et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 98
15. Fernandes Azevedo et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Met Unclear Met N/A Moderate 76
16. Lee and Chon, 2020 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 97
17. Miura et al, 2018 Retrospective cross-sectional Met N/A Unmet N/A High 133
18. Moura et al, 2018 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 96
19. Natu et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Unmet Met Met N/A High 77
20. Nazeri et al, 2018 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 78
21. Paulino et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Met Unmet Met N/A High 79
22. Reiter et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Met Unmet Unmet N/A High 80
23. Sikora et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 95
24. Sruthi et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 81
25. Tu et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Met Met Unmet N/A High 124
26. Yoo et al, 2018 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 94
27. Mitsikostas et al, 2017 Case series Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 93
28. Naikoo et al, 2017 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 82
29. Reiter et al, 2017 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 83
30. Su et al, 2017 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 84
31. Tan et al, 2017 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 108
32. Tournavitis et al, 2017 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 85
33. van Selms et al, 2017 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 86
34. Yeung et al, 2017 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 87
35. Zakrzewska et al, 2017 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 107
36. Bertoli and de Leeuw, 2016 Cross-sectional Met N/A Unmet N/A High 70
37. Braud and Boucher, 2016 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 139
38. das Neves de Araújo Lima et al, 2016 Cross-sectional Met Unclear Met N/A Moderate 138
39. Davies et al, 2016 Cross-sectional Met Unclear Met N/A Moderate 164
40. Duraçoğlu et al, 2016 Cross-sectional Met Unmet Met N/A High 67
41. Mousavi et al, 2016 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 137
42. Patil et al, 2016 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 68
43. Sevrain et al, 2016 Retrospective study Unmet NA Met NA High 92
44. Tang et al, 2016 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 134
45. Visscher et al, 2016 Retrospective study Unmet N/A Unmet N/A High 69
46. Al-Havaz et al, 2015 Cross-sectional Unmet N/A Met N/A High 62
47. Brailo and
Zakrzewska, 2015
Cross-sectional Unclear N/A Met N/A Moderate 122
48. Kotiranta et al, 2015 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 63
49. Lei et al, 2015 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 64
50. Lopez-Jornet et al, 2015 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 91
51. Majumder et al, 2015 Cross-sectional Unmet N/A Met N/A High 65
52. Marino et al, 2015 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 136
53. Reiter et al, 2015 Retrospective observational Met N/A Unmet N/A High 66
54. Tokura et al, 2015 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 135
55. Wu et al, 2015 Retrospective cohort Unmet Met Met N/A High 106
56. Calixtre et al, 2014 Longitudinal study Unmet NA Met NA High 54
57. Cioffi et al, 2014 Cross-sectional Unmet N/A Met N/A High 121
58. Davis et al, 2014 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 55
59. Gerrits et al, 2014 Longitudinal cohort Unmet N/A Met N/A High 131
60. Komiyama et al, 2014 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 56
61. Minghelli et al, 2014 Cross-sectional Unmet N/A Met N/A High 57
62. Reissmann et al, 2014 Case-control Met Unclear Met N/A Moderate 58
63. Smriti et al, 2014 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 59
64. Sood et al, 2014 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 60
65. Vasudeva et al, 2014 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 61
66. Castelli et al, 2013 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 51
67. Chen et al, 2013 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 52
68. Ligthart et al, 2013 Longitudinal cohort Met N/A Met N/A Low 129
69. Ozdemir-Karatas et al, 2013 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 53
70. Sipilä et al, 2013 Longitudinal cohort Met Met Met N/A Low 130
71. Smith et al, 2013 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 105
72. de Lucena et al, 2012 Longitudinal prospective Met Unclear Met N/A Moderate 45
73. de Souza et al, 2012 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 89
74. Diniz et al, 2012 Longitudinal cohort Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 46
75. Guarda-Nardini et al, 2012 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 47
76. Kindler et al, 2012 Prospective cohort Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 48
77. Komiyama et al, 2012 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 120
78. Rodrigues et al, 2012 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 49
79. Schiavone et al, 2012 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 90
80. Schwahn et al, 2012 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 50
81. Wan et al, 2012 Cross-sectional Unclear N/A Met N/A Moderate 128
82. Celić et al, 2011 Cross-sectional Unclear N/A Met N/A Moderate 40
83. Dworkin, 2011 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 41
84. Gustin et al, 2011 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 16
85. Mačianskytė et al, 2011 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 118
86. Monteiro et al, 2011 Cross-sectional Unmet N/A Met N/A High 42
87. Taiminen et al, 2011 Cross-sectional Unclear N/A Met N/A Moderate 119
88. van Seventer et al, 2011 Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial Met Met Met Met Low 104
89. Velly et al, 2011 Prospective cohort Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 43
90. Xu et al, 2011 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 44
91. Bakhtiari et al, 2010 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 103
92. Giannakopoulos et al, 2010 Case-control Met Unclear Met N/A Moderate 35
93. Kim et al, 2010 Cross-sectional Met Unclear Met N/A Moderate 116
94. Lajnert et al, 2010 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 36
95. Manfredini et al, 2010a Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 37
96. Manfredini et al, 2010b Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 38
97. McMillan et al, 2010 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 127
98. Pesqueira et al, 2010 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 39
99. Takenoshita et al, 2010 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 117
100. Bonjardim et al, 2009 Cross-sectional Unmet N/A Met N/A High 31
101. Choi et al, 2009 Retrospective Unclear N/A Unmet N/A High 115
102. Gao et al, 2009 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 165
103. Licini et al, 2009 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 32
104. Macfarlane et al, 2009 Prospective cohort Unmet N/A Met N/A High 33
105. Stavrianos et al, 2009 Prospective cohort Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 34
106. Streffer et al, 2009 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 126
107. Baad-Hansen et al, 2008 Cross-sectional Met Met Met N/A Low 113
108. Ballegaard et al, 2008 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met Met Low 123
109. Buljan et al, 2008 Cross-sectional Unmet N/A Unclear N/A High 88
110. Castro et al, 2008 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 114
111. Lee et al, 2008 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 29
112. Reissmann et al, 2008 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 30
113. Bertoli et al, 2007 Retrospective Unmet N/A Unmet N/A High 26
114. John et al, 2007 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 27
115. List et al, 2007 Case-control Met Met Met N/A Low 132
116. Mongini et al, 2007 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 112
117. Nifosi et al, 2007 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met Met Low 28
118. GaldÓn et al, 2006 Cross-sectional Met N/A Met N/A Moderate 25

COFP Assessment Criteria

Of the included studies, 97% followed an established diagnostic criteria/classification system for the COFP conditions. These included the RDC/TMD,2530,32,3442,47,49,5254,56,58,6164,66,68,70,73,75,76,78,80,81,83,84,86,87,114,115,121,123 the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for TMD,31,33,57,59,60,65,77,79 the International Headache Society (IHS) ICHD-3 criteria, 78,89,91,93,94,96,97,99,100,102,108,109,112,115,122125,129,133 the AAOP criteria,46,48,50,51,112,114 the IASP criteria, 90,107,114,115,117,120 the Craniomandibular Index (CMI), 43,116 and the European Academy of Craniomandibular Disorders (EACD) criteria.45 The Liverpool criteria for trigeminal nerve pain were used in one study,16 while another used the Ma and Zhang classification for TMD pain.44

Psychologic Screening Tools Used

The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used by 14 studies,16,39,42,51,52,55,58,76,85,89,90,95,98,164 the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS) used by 6 studies,88,100,117,124,133,165 and the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (ZSAS) used by 3 studies.59,100,165 A total of 69 studies used a single psychologic tool, while 49 used a combination of psychologic assessment tools. The RDC/TMD Axis II questionnaire 2527,29,32,3641,47,49,53,56,58,62,63,66,70,72,83,121,123,132 was used exclusively for TMD pain, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) 26,28,37,38,40,41,44,47,52,53,63,66,69,70,94,97,113,116,120,121,127 was used to assess psychologic symptoms/distress, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 31,35,45,54,57,60,61,65,67,71,7375,78,79,91,92,104,105,107,111,114,115,122,126 was most commonly used to screen for anxiety and/or depression. Five studies used the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnosis-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID-DSM-4/5) guide. 28,112,119,131,133

Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with COFP

The prevalence of depression and/or anxiety in COFP, according to COFP group and assessment instrument, are summarized in Figs 2 and 3. With respect to standardized questionnaire assessments, rates were included only for those patients evidencing moderate or severe symptoms (where questionnaires included an umbrella classification of mild to moderate, patients scoring in this range were also considered), or, in the case of HADS, those showing borderline clinical or clinically significant levels. Where studies included assessments at two time points, only the first was included.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Fig 2

(a) Depression and (b) anxiety across TMD studies. Studies are ordered according to TMD condition, depression/anxiety measure, and percentage of depression/anxiety reported. DD = disc displacement; HA = headache. See other abbreviations in Table 1 legend.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Fig 3

Rates of (a) depression and (b) anxiety across neuropathic, mixed, and idiopathic/atypical orofacial pain (OFP) condition studies. Studies are ordered according to OFP condition, depression/anxiety measure, and percentage of depression/anxiety reported. CH = chronic; FP = facial pain. See other abbreviations in Table 1 legend.

For TMDs, the prevalence of observed depression ranged from 7.0% to 77.4% (Fig 2a). In general, studies using the RDC/TMD or SCL-90-R assessments reported the most consistent prevalence rates, with 14 of 20 (70%) studies observing depression in 41.4% to 56.0% of participants. Studies adopting other standardized questionnaires (eg, HADS/Beck Depression Inventory [BDI]) reported lower rates of depression, although this varied considerably across studies, while diagnostic assessments of depression were consistently around 20% (15.7% to 22.3%). Rates of clinically significant anxiety in TMD also varied widely across studies (7.4% to 78.0%; Fig 2b), although the observed prevalence in studies using the RDC/TMD and SCL-90-R or the HADS assessments were more comparable, with 11 of 14 studies adopting one of the measures and yielding anxiety case rates between 43.9% and 63.0% with either measure. The single study that estimated the prevalence of anxiety using the CID-S48 reported high rates of anxiety in both TMD MP (78.0%) and TMD JP (64.8%). In contrast, the GAD-7 questionnaire assessments of TMD anxiety80,84,87 resulted in lower prevalence rates, ranging from 11.4% to 20.0%. Notably, irrespective of assessment method, studies with a low prevalence of depression and/or anxiety tended to recruit nonclinical samples31,46,62,79 or TMD samples with low pain disability levels,44 while higher rates were observed in clinical studies of patients with TMD and headache.73,123

The prevalence of depression and anxiety for neuropathic, mixed, and idiopathic/atypical COFP conditions ranged from 2.2% to 100% and from 0% to 80.7%, respectively (Fig 3). Rates of depression and anxiety varied widely in TN samples, with low prevalence rates reported in studies using diagnostic assessments106,112 and higher rates in TN with associated comorbidities, such as chronic facial pain118 and MS.111 Prevalence rates of depression and anxiety in BMS were more consistent. Aside from one small clinical study of 8 patients with treatment-resistant BMS that observed depression in all patients,93 questionnaire-based assessments yielded moderate to severe symptoms for a quarter to a half of BMS patients across studies. Clinically significant levels of anxiety in BMS were highest in studies using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) and HADS (39.3% to 80.7%)92,93,136,139 assessments and lowest in those employing the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI; 21.0% to 33.3%).96,138 Three of the four BMS studies with diagnostic assessments reported anxiety disorders in a third to a half of participating patients.89,117,119 In one study of PTNP pain, clinically significant anxiety was found in 51.2% of individuals and depression in 30.0% of cases.105 Depression in AO was reported at 74.0% in one study using the SCL-90-R,132 but at only 15.4% in a diagnostic assessment study.133 Similarly, rates of diagnosed anxiety disorders in PDAP samples were uncommon in two studies (10.1% to 10.8%).117,133

Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression in COFP Conditions vs Control Participants

A number of studies comparing prevalence rates in TMD and control participants reported significantly higher rates of anxiety,31,45,58,59,61,71,73,79,82 depression,36,58,68,71,73 or anxiety and/or depression57,65 in individuals with TMD. One TMD study of dental students failed to find significant differences in state and trait anxiety between those with and without TMD,76 while another three studies of pre-university/university students reported significantly higher anxiety prevalence rates in TMD cases vs controls, but nonsignificant elevations in depression.31,45,79 Significantly higher rates of depression were also observed in studies comparing mixed COFP patients to individuals without OFP.33,127,130

Although studies comparing mean scores of standardized questionnaires assessing anxiety and depression in neuropathic COFP conditions, such as TN or BMS, against control participants have reported elevated scores in the former (indicative of greater levels of symptoms of anxiety/depression),91,102,110 fewer controlled studies have compared prevalence rates of clinically relevant anxiety or depression. However, two controlled studies observed significantly elevated rates of both anxiety and depressive disorders in patients with TN106 and BMS,89 while another study comparing BMS and secondary oral burning patients reported elevated rates of moderate to severe depression according to the BDI in BMS, but comparable rates of anxiety according to the BAI.138 Finally, one study comparing PDAP and control participants found significantly more of the PDAP patients showed moderate to severe depression levels.132

Single-Study Comparisons of Different COFP Conditions

Thirteen studies compared two or more types of COFP conditions.16,112115,117122,124,125 In one study, neuropathic pain (TN and trigeminal neuropathy) and TMD pain patients were significantly (but comparably) impaired in domains of anxiety (state and trait anxiety) and depression when compared to controls.16 Another study reported that TN patients showed numerically higher scores on measures of psychologic impairment than TMD patients, although there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups.114 When TN and PIFP were investigated, it was observed that TN patients evidenced significantly higher levels of pain perception than PIFP patients and were significantly more likely to exhibit moderate to severe depression levels (76% vs 0%).118 Another study reported that BMS and PIFP demonstrated comparable levels of depressive symptoms.119 Komiyama et al compared patients with BMS and TN and reported that pain levels were higher in TN than BMS. However, regression analyses indicated the associated risk of depression in BMS patients was significantly higher than in TN patients.120 Takenoshita et al investigated mood in COFP patients (BMS and PDAP) using the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and observed depressive tendencies in 32.1% of BMS patients and 33.3% of individuals with PDAP.117 The large-scale study of Gerrits et al on chronic pain suggested the onset of anxiety and/or depression with pain and observed that pain specifically in the orofacial region was associated with depressive symptoms.131 A study on BMS and PIFP using SCID guides reported high rates of psychiatric disorders, most commonly major depression (30.2%), social phobia (15.9%), specific phobia (11.1%), and panic disorder (7.9%); in these cases, illness runs a chronic course and is difficult to treat.119 Another study on TMD pain using the same interview technique exhibited frequent presence of psychiatric history in myofascial pain patients.28 Melek et al compared TN to peripheral painful traumatic trigeminal neuropathy (PPTTN), and depression was reported in 54% of TN and 36% of PPTTN, while anxiety was comparable in both groups (34% and 39%, respectively).125

Association Between Orofacial Pain Severity and Chronicity with Anxiety and Depression

The majority of selected studies (with both neuropathic and nonneuropathic pain samples) demonstrated that an increase in pain intensity and/or pain chronicity (more than 3-month duration)3 elevated patients’ anxiety and depressive symptom levels.

Neuropathic Orofacial Pain

For patients with neuropathic pain, consistent associations of anxiety and depression with pain intensity were identified. For example, patients with severe trigeminal nerve injury pain showed elevated levels of depression on the HADS compared to patients with moderate and mild pain levels in one study.105 In another study, change in posttraumatic peripheral neuropathic pain levels was significantly associated with change in anxiety and depression levels104; every 2-point decrease in level of pain on a 0–10 numeric rating scale was associated with a 1.5-point reduction in anxiety and a 1.2-point reduction in depression on the HADS.104 BMS patients also demonstrated a positive association between levels of depression and BMS symptom severity.88 Additionally, one study found an association between presence of anxiety symptoms and pain severity among elderly individuals with neuropathic pain (BMS).103

TMD Pain

For TMD pain, cases were divided into acute and chronic by some investigators for comparison. Depression was more prevalent in patients with chronic TMD pain,36,40,43,66,69 and severity of depression and anxiety increased with higher graded chronic pain scores.44,47,49,63,66,68,116 Su et al compared TMD patients with high- and low-intensity pain and reported marked differences in prevalence of both moderate to severe anxiety (27.9% vs 11.4%) and moderate to severe depression (33.5% vs 10.2%).84 Multiple pain sites were also associated with higher levels of depression in another study.40 A number of investigators also reported significant associations between anxiety levels and chronic TMD pain,31,39,42,58,61,70 most predominantly for the myofascial subtype of TMD.25,45,48,64 Patients with TMD pain, especially muscle pain, presented with more psychologic problems compared to patients with TMD joint pain in one study.28 Moderate-to-severe anxiety and depression in chronic TMD were reported as high as 58.3% and 61.2%, respectively, in another study.66

Some studies with TMD patients reported significant associations between the level of physical/psychologic disability and pain intensity using a hierarchical pain grading approach (Graded Chronic Pain Scale [GCPS]), which classifies pain/disability into four broad categories: grade I (low pain intensity/low disability); grade II (high intensity/low disability); grade III (moderately limiting pain/high disability); and grade IV (severely limiting pain/high disability).140 For example, in one study, psychologic impact tended to be greater in patients with grade III or IV pain, and anxiety was identified in 53.8% of these individuals and depression in 76.9% of these individuals44; in another study, severe depression was prevalent in 40.7% of patients with grade III or IV pain.38

Orofacial Pain, Gender/Age, and Anxiety and Depression

Most, but not all, studies considering gender suggested women with OFP may report higher levels of anxiety or depressive symptoms than men. For example, in one study, younger (under the age of 24 years) and middle aged (between 35 and 55 years) women with OFP scored higher on a depression scale compared to men of similar ages.56 Licini et al32 reported that moderate to severe depression was evident in 56.1% of women with TMD pain compared to only 10% of men. Women with chronic TMD myofascial pain also scored marginally higher on a depression scale than men in another study,35 although men with other chronic facial painful conditions (postsurgical pain, posttraumatic, or neuropathic pain) and not specifically TMD pain were more depressed compared to women.35 In contrast, Giannakopoulos et al did not find any differences in anxiety between men and women with TMD, suggesting poorer psychologic well-being in women is not uniformly observed in studies of OFP.35

Impact of Comorbid Conditions on Anxiety and Depression in Individuals with Orofacial Pain

Both neuropathic and nonneuropathic (ie, TMD) OFP can coexist with other medical conditions, such as degenerative disease, migraine, and widespread pain, and the reviewed studies suggest that their presence can increase the likelihood of significant psychologic disability in affected individuals.30,71,78,111,113,119,121,123,127,129 For example, a study of acute TMD subtypes showed that individuals with muscle and joint pain, along with a history of degenerative joint disorder, have significantly higher levels of depression compared to those with a single condition.30 The study by Cioffi et al on TMD pain and migraine found that individuals with a combination of chronic TMD myofascial pain and migraine were experiencing significantly higher levels of depression compared to isolated TMD groups.121 Ballegaard et al studied depressive symptoms in patients with headache and compared them to patients having headache and comorbid TMD, reporting that 34.1% of headache patients had depressive symptoms compared to more than 70% (70.9%) of those with headache and comorbid TMD pain.123

A similar pattern of results emerged from studies on neuropathic OFP. For instance, Lopez-Jornet et al observed a positive association among BMS, poor sleep quality, and comorbid anxiety/depression (as measured using HADS). Regression analyses indicated that for every 1-point increase in HADS depression score, the odds of sleep quality deterioration increased by 1.26 times.91 McMillan et al found that while patients with OFP were 3.5 times more likely to exhibit moderate to severe depression than control participants, psychologic distress was observed most often in individuals with OFP who had widespread pain symptoms; these patients constituted 13.5% of their OFP sample.127

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to review research describing anxiety and depression in patients with neuropathic and/or nonneuropathic OFP. The results showed that experience of OFP is associated with both anxiety and depression that can be disabling in nature and markedly influences individuals’ emotional well-being. This review of 118 studies identified positive associations between pain intensity, chronicity, and symptom severity and the presence of anxiety and/or depression. The prevalence of clinically significant or moderate to severe anxiety in neuropathic, mixed, and idiopathic/atypical orofacial pain conditions ranged from 0% to 80.7% of cases, while the prevalence of clinically significant or moderate to severe depression ranged from 2.2% to 100% of cases. In nonneuropathic (ie, TMD) pain conditions, the observed ranges were also wide; anxiety ranged from 7.4% to 78.0% of cases, and depression from 7.0% to 77.4% of cases. The large variance in the observed rates across studies likely reflects the differential methods of assessment and/or nature of the recruited samples in the included studies. For TMD conditions, the majority of RDC/TMD or SCL-90-R assessments yielded depression rates of around 40% to 60%, and most RDC/TMD, SCL-90-R, or HADS assessments resulted in an anxiety prevalence of 40% to 65%; diagnostic assessments of depression and anxiety suggested disorder rates of 15% to 20% and 15% to 35%, respectively. Irrespective of assessment method, the lowest observed prevalence rates were in TMD studies employing student samples rather than clinical populations. The majority of questionnaire-based assessment in patients with TN yielded rates of depression and anxiety of around 20% to 35% and 40% to 55%, respectively, with lower rates in studies reporting diagnostic assessments, while questionnaire-based assessments of depression and anxiety in BMS studies showed moderate-severe symptoms in a quarter to a half of patients, with similar rates reported in most diagnostic studies of BMS patients.

The association between pain and depression is complicated due to their common neurobiology, complex environmental influences, and negative cognitions.141 Neurotransmitters such as serotonin, norepinephrine, glutamate, and gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) are intimately linked with pain processing as well as mood.141 For instance, serotonin and norepinephrine reduction are associated with an impeded gate control mechanism and mood disorder progression.142 The present review identified a close association between COFP and psychologic comorbidities. This is in line with available literature, where psychologic factors are now recognized as important comorbid features in the presentation of OFP.143,144 All types of pain are influenced by psychologic components; however, negative affect appears particularly important in the emergence and maintenance of chronic pain syndromes.145,146 COFP has a profound influence on the psychologic health of individuals; this includes anxiety, stress, phobias, depressive symptoms, catastrophizing, and emotional disturbances,12 as well as oral health–related quality of life.9 Increased pain intensity also negatively impacts quality of life.10 The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has recognized that mental illnesses such as anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders, and mood disorders are closely related to medical conditions, including hypersensitive pain perception.145 TMD myofascial pain patients are more likely to have higher levels of psychologic symptoms.147 This concurs with the findings of a recent systematic review reporting the frequent cooccurrence of psychiatric disorders and masticatory muscle pain.148

Pain perception and experience differ considerably across individuals and vary according to gender. The overrepresentation of women in OFP pain samples, especially in studies of TMD pain, was illustrated in this review. Furthermore, gender differences in the few studies directly addressing the role of gender in psychologic correlates of OFP suggested that both anxiety and depression are more often observed in women with TMD pain than in men with TMD pain. There are reports that estrogen may have a role in the pain-regulatory mechanisms of TMD pain subgroups.149 However, this needs further investigation. The impact of gender on comorbid anxiety and/or depression in individuals with neuropathic OFP is less clear and needs to be addressed in future studies.

The present review also suggests that individuals presenting with multiple pain conditions are more likely to have pronounced psychologic problems.121,123,131 More specifically, across reviewed studies, individuals with multiple OFP conditions were more likely to have severe negative psychologic impairment, most obviously high levels of depression, compared to those with single conditions. Similar findings have been reported in the OFP literature150 and are broadly consistent with studies of body pain, where patients with widespread chronic pain (eg, fibromyalgia) often present with marked negative affective and cognitive states.151

There was a substantial degree of variability in the designs and associated RoBs of studies included in this review, which contributed to the difficulty in arriving at a consensus. Eleven studies used a longitudinal prospective design, 10 were designed as case-control, and 8 were retrospective. The absence of (pain-free) control groups was a frequent shortcoming of studies included in this review. Nevertheless, the overwhelming majority of studies (46) where a control sample was employed evidenced higher rates of anxiety and/or depression in OFP patients (neuropathic, mixed OFP, and TMD) compared to pain-free controls.16,132 The only exception to this was a small number of TMD studies which recruited student (nonpatient) populations in which the individuals diagnosed with TMD were not currently receiving or seeking treatment.31,45,76,79

Most studies, particularly those with neuropathic OFP samples, were conducted at tertiary care units through opportunity sampling. Of course, patient recruitment from a tertiary care unit may not be representative of the general population, reducing the generalizability and external validity of the included studies. More specifically, this may have resulted in overpresentation of anxiety and/or depression in individuals with OFP. Most studies (n = 86) were cross-sectional, where the data were collected at a single point in time, rendering it difficult to differentiate between cause and effect through simple association.152 As such, from this review, a clear association on the etiologic pathway could not be established; specifically, whether pain resulted in psychologic morbidity or vice versa. However, both pain and psychologic morbidity are related to a common etiologic factor (for example, early psychologic or physical trauma could predispose individuals to both pain and psychologic distress in the future), and it is important to consider that a number of studies have suggested that a range of premorbid psychologic variables can predict the development of OFP, particularly TMD.153,154 However, the available evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship between anxiety and/or depression and pain,155 supported in part by functional neuroimaging studies suggesting shared underlying neuro mechanisms.156

Significant variation in the use of psychologic tools for data collection was found. Various self-report questionnaires were utilized, and the majority of studies did not make a distinction between acute and chronic pain, although most of the patients included in studies had OFP for more than 3 months. This may have affected the validity of the data due to variation in personal characteristics, level of patients’ education, their ethnicity, culture, and social beliefs.157 The majority of studies in the current review employed only a single psychologic scale, and most adopted the questionnaire-specific cut-off points for cases of anxiety or depression, which remain difficult to interpret across measures. For example, comparisons between the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)-State158 can be made with HADS, but a compelling comparison dataset is as yet not available,35 and STAI-Trait also includes a number of depression items related to depressive symptomatology.159 Few studies have used the SCID-DSM-IV,28,112,119,131 which is a formal diagnostic tool, as opposed to questionnaires such as HADS, which better serve as screening instruments (ie, do not allow for definite diagnoses) and provide dimensional rather than categorical representations of mood.160 More research is needed through employment of a standardized set of questionnaires and screening tools that also address wider psychologic and social aspects of psychologic function in patients with OFP.

Notable differences emerged in the diagnostic procedures of COFP conditions across studies, inasmuch as there were several classification systems used that do not entirely concur with one another; therefore, results across different studies with OFP samples are not completely comparable. Literature on OFP classifications has discussed this issue in detail,143,161 emphasizing the need for a standardized biopsychosocial classification of OFP, which is highlighted again in the present review.

Limited datasets were considered for this review, and only English-language articles were searched, reducing the scope of reviewed studies. Nevertheless, the review demonstrated substantive evidence for associations of anxiety and depression with both neuropathic and nonneuropathic OFP conditions. Both within and across studies, no meaningful differences in anxiety or depression levels between patients with neuropathic conditions and those with nonneuropathic (ie, TMD) pain were found,16,121 consistent with broader evidence that the psychologic impact of chronic pain is universal irrespective of neuropathic or nociceptive characteristics of experienced symptoms.162 Differences in the study designs and psychologic assessment tools employed may have limited the ability to detect differential rates of psychologic comorbidities according to presenting OFP symptoms. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, meta-analyses were not possible, although this does reduce the strength of the findings. Nevertheless, the present results are consistent with the hypothesis that OFP conditions have an impact on the psychologic well-being of individuals and are meaningful in the context of formulating treatment strategies.

Conclusions

OFP has a significant impact on patients’ psychologic well-being. This critical review, within its limitations, highlighted an association between OFP and psychologic comorbidity. Due to the heterogeneity across studies, it was not possible to conduct meta-analyses in order to substantiate this evidence in a robust manner. Most work to date involves patients with TMD pain (nonneuropathic), and much less concerns other types of pain, such as neurovascular, neuropathic, and idiopathic OFP. OFP requires a biopsychosocial approach for holistic management.163 Future research should focus on comparing psychologic morbidity in different types of COFP with a view to develop more tailored treatment strategies for individuals according to presenting symptomatology. There is also a need for studies exploring precondition psychologic morbidity, which may have a significant role in predisposing individuals to developing chronic pain.4,142

Clinical Implications

COFP causes distress and disability, affects life negatively, and often leads to anxiety and/or depression and extensive use of the health care system. Holistic management for OFP requires a biopsychosocial approach.

Acknowledgments

No funding body supported this work.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author contributions: A.K., J.G.S., L.M., and T.R. designed the review. A.K. extracted the articles, and J.G.S., L.M., and T.R. confirmed the relevance. A.K. and J.G.S. contributed to the write-up of the manuscript. L.M. and T.R. checked the draft. All authors commented on the manuscript draft and approved the final draft.

References

  1. International Classification of Orofacial Pain, ed 1. Cephalalgia. 2020;40:129–221. doi: 10.1177/0333102419893823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. IASP. Pain terms. In: Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. ed 2. Seattle: IASP; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  3. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, et al. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015;156:1003–1007. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Macrae WA. Chronic post-surgical pain: 10 years on. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:77–86. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Williams DA. The importance of psychological assessment in chronic pain. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23:554–559. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283652af1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nilsson H, Samuelsson M, Ekdahl S, Halling Y, Oster A, Perseius KI. Experiences by patients and health professionals of a multidisciplinary intervention for long-term orofacial pain. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013;6:365–371. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S42488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Breivik H, Eisenberg E, O’Brien T OPENMinds. The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: The case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jamison RN, Edwards RR. Integrating pain management in clinical practice. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2012;19:49–64. doi: 10.1007/s10880-012-9295-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shueb SS, Nixdorf DR, John MT, Alonso BF, Durham J. What is the impact of acute and chronic orofacial pain on quality of life? J Dent. 2015;43:1203–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Haviv Y, Zini A, Etzioni Y, et al. The impact of chronic orofacial pain on daily life: The vulnerable patient and disruptive pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Macfarlane TV, Blinkhorn AS, Davies RM, Ryan P, Worthington HV, Macfarlane GJ. Orofacial pain: Just another chronic pain? Results from a population-based survey. Pain. 2002;99:453–458. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00181-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ohrbach R, Durham J. Biopsychosocial aspects of orofacial pain. In: Farah CS, Balasubramaniam R, McCullough MJ, editors. Contemporary Oral Medicine. Heidelberg: Springer; 2018. pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chien PF, Khan KS, Siassakos D. Registration of systematic reviews: PROSPERO. BJOG. 2012;119:903–905. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03242.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. American Psychiatric Association. APA Dictionary of Psychology. www.apa.org/research/action/glossary . Accessed 13 April, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  15. World Health Organization. Geneva, World Health Organization:; 1992. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gustin SM, Wilcox SL, Peck CC, Murray GM, Henderson LA. Similarity of suffering: equivalence of psychological and psychosocial factors in neuropathic and non-neuropathic orofacial pain patients. Pain. 2011;152:825–832. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629–808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the international RDC/TMD Consortium network and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28:6–27. doi: 10.11607/jop.1151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Merskey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of Chronic Pain. ed 2. Seattle: IASP; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  20. de Leeuw R, Klasser GD. Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. Chicago: Quintessence; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. pp. 151–185. [Google Scholar]
  22. Galli F, Lodi G, Sardella A, Vegni E. Role of psychological factors in burning mouth syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2016;37:265–277. doi: 10.1177/0333102416646769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lodi G, Pellicano R, Carrozzo M. Hepatitis C virus infection and lichen planus: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Oral Dis. 2010;16:601–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Syrjänen S, Lodi G, von Bültzingslöwen I, et al. Human papillomaviruses in oral carcinoma and oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review. Oral Dis. 2011;17(suppl 1):58–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. GaldÓn MJ, Durá E, Andreu Y, Ferrando M, Poveda R, Bagán JV. Multidimensional approach to the differences between muscular and articular temporomandibular patients: Coping, distress, and pain characteristics. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bertoli E, de Leeuw R, Schmidt JE, Okeson JP, Carlson CR. Prevalence and impact of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in patients with masticatory muscle or temporomandibular joint pain: differences and similarities. J Orofac Pain. 2007;21:107–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. John MT, Reissmann DR, Schierz O, Wassell RW. Oral health-related quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2007;21:46–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nifosi F, Violato E, Pavan C, et al. Psychopathology and clinical features in an Italian sample of patients with myofascial and temporomandibular joint pain: preliminary data. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2007;37:283–300. doi: 10.2190/PM.37.3.f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lee LT, Yeung RW, Wong MC, McMillan AS. Diagnostic sub-types, psychological distress and psychosocial dysfunction in southern Chinese people with temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:184–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01792.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Reissmann DR, John MT, Wassell RW, Hinz A. Psychosocial profiles of diagnostic subgroups of temporomandibular disorder patients. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008;116:237–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00528.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bonjardim LR, Lopes-Filho RJ, Amado G, Albuquerque RL, Goncalves SR. Association between symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and gender, morphological occlusion, and psychological factors in a group of university students. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20:190–194. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.52901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Licini F, Nojelli A, Segù M, Collesano V. Role of psychosocial factors in the etiology of temporomandibular disorders: Relevance of a biaxial diagnosis. Minerva Stomatol. 2009;58:557–566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Macfarlane TV, Kenealy P, Kingdon HA, et al. Orofacial pain in young adults and associated childhood and adulthood factors: Results of the population study, Wales, United Kingdom. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37:438–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stavrianos C, Kafas P, Jerjes W, Upile T, Stavrianous I, Nazaroglou I, Kafas G. Disease phobia in patients with temporomandibular joint pain assessed by the Illness Attitude Scale. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2009;52:73–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Giannakopoulos NN, Keller L, Rammelsberg P, Kronmüller KT, Schmitter M. Anxiety and depression in patients with chronic temporomandibular pain and in controls. J Dent. 2010;38:369–376. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lajnert V, Frančišković T, Grzic R, et al. Depression, somatization and anxiety in female patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) Coll Antropol. 2010;34:1415–1419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Manfredini D, Borella L, Favero L, Ferronato G, Guarda-Nardini L. Chronic pain severity and depression/somatization levels in TMD patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:529–534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Manfredini D, Winocur E, Ahlberg J, Guarda-Nardini L, Lobbezoo F. Psychosocial impairment in temporomandibular disorders patients. RDC/TMD axis II findings from a multicentre study. J Dent. 2010;38:765–772. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pesqueira AA, Zuim PR, Monteiro DR, Ribeiro Pdo P, Garcia AR. Relationship between psychological factors and symptoms of TMD in university undergraduate students. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2010;23:182–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Celić R, Braut V, Petricević N. Influence of depression and somatization on acute and chronic orofacial pain in patients with single or multiple TMD diagnoses. Coll Antropol. 2011;35:709–713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dworkin SF. Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain-related disability found related to depression, nonspecific physical symptoms, and pain duration at 3 international sites. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2011;11:143–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Monteiro DR, Zuim PR, Pesqueira AA, Ribeiro Pdo P, Garcia AR. Relationship between anxiety and chronic orofacial pain of temporomandibular disorder in a group of university students. J Prosthodont Res. 2011;55:154–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Velly AM, Look JO, Carlson C, et al. The effect of catastrophizing and depression on chronic pain–a prospective cohort study of temporomandibular muscle and joint pain disorders. Pain. 2011;152:2377–2383. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Xu WH, Guo CB, Wu RG, Ma XC. Investigation of the psychological status of 162 female TMD patients with different chronic pain severity. Chin J Dent Res. 2011;14:53–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. de Lucena IM, Rodrigues LL, Teixeira ML, Pozza DH, Guimaraes AS. Prospective study of a group of pre-university students evaluating anxiety and depression relationships with temporomandibular disorders. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012;4:e102–e106. doi: 10.4317/jced.50745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Diniz MR, Sabadin PA, Leite FP, Kamizaki R. Psychological factors related to temporomandibular disorders: an evaluation of students preparing for college entrance examinations. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2012;25:74–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Guarda-Nardini L, Pavan C, Arveda N, Ferronato G, Manfredini D. Psychometric features of temporomandibular disorders patients in relation to pain diffusion, location, intensity and duration. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:737–743. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02320.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kindler S, Samietz S, Houshmand M, et al. Depressive and anxiety symptoms as risk factors for temporomandibular joint pain: A prospective cohort study in the general population. J Pain. 2012;13:1188–1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rodrigues JH, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, Bussadori SK, et al. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and their impact on psychosocial status in non-patient university student’s population. Physiother Res Int. 2012;17:21–28. doi: 10.1002/pri.508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schwahn C, Grabe HJ, Meyer zu Schwabedissen H, et al. The effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphisms on pain is modified by depressive symptoms. Eur J Pain. 2012;16:878–889. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Castelli L, De Santis F, De Giorgi I, et al. Alexithymia, anger and psychological distress in patients with myofascial pain: A case-control study. Front Psychol. 2013;4:490. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Chen H, Nackley A, Miller V, Diatchenko L, Maixner W. Multisystem dysregulation in painful temporomandibular disorders. J Pain. 2013;14:983–996. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ozdemir-Karatas M, Peker K, Balık A, Uysal O, Tuncer EB. Identifying potential predictors of pain-related disability in Turkish patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain. J Headache Pain. 2013;14:17. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Calixtre LB, Grüninger BL, Chaves TC, Oliveira AB. Is there an association between anxiety/depression and temporomandibular disorders in college students? J Appl Oral Sci. 2014;22:15–21. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Davis CE, Stockstill JW, Stanley WD, Wu Q. Pain-related worry in patients with chronic orofacial pain. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145:722–730. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Komiyama O, Obara R, Iida T, et al. Age-related associations between psychological characteristics and pain intensity among Japanese patients with temporomandibular disorder. J Oral Sci. 2014;56:221–225. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.56.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Minghelli B, Morgado M, Caro T. Association of temporomandibular disorder symptoms with anxiety and depression in Portuguese college students. J Oral Sci. 2014;56:127–133. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.56.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Reissmann DR, John MT, Seedorf H, Doering S, Schierz O. Temporomandibular disorder pain is related to the general disposition to be anxious. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28:322–330. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Smriti BJ, Patni VM, Mukta M, Gangotri S. Association between symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and gender, morphological occlusion, and psychological factor in dental student’s [sic] Int J Sci Stud. 2014;2:55–58. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sood D, Subramaniam AV, Subramaniam T. Association and correlation between temporomandibular disorders and psychological factors in a group of dental undergraduate students. Int J Appl Sci Biotechnology. 2014:426–431. [Google Scholar]
  61. Vasudeva S, Iyengar A, Seetaramaiah N. Correlation of anxiety levels between temporomandibular disorder patients and normal subjects. J Oral Dis. 2014:579674. [Google Scholar]
  62. Al-Havaz A, Safari S, Mohammadpour N, Kheirkhah F, Motalleb-Nezhad M, Arian M. Relationship between temporomandibular joint dysfunction and psychological distress among students of Babol University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Iran. J Oral Health Oral Epidemiol. 2015:94–101. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kotiranta U, Suvinen T, Kauko T, et al. Subtyping patients with temporomandibular disorders in a primary health care setting on the basis of the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders axis II pain-related disability: A step toward tailored treatment planning? J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2015;29:126–134. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lei J, Liu MQ, Yap AU, Fu KY. Sleep disturbance and psychologic distress: Prevalence and risk indicators for temporomandibular disorders in a Chinese population. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2015;29:24–30. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Majumder K, Sharma S, Dayashankara Rao JK, Siwach V, Arya V, Gulia S. Prevalence and sex distribution of temporomandibular disorder and their association with anxiety and depression in Indian medical university students. Int J Clin Med. 2015;6:570–578. [Google Scholar]
  66. Reiter S, Emodi-Perlman A, Goldsmith C, Friedman-Rubin P, Winocur E. Comorbidity between depression and anxiety in patients with temporomandibular disorders according to the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2015;29:135–143. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Dıraçoğlu D, Yıldırım NK, Saral İ, et al. Temporomandibular dysfunction and risk factors for anxiety and depression. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;29:487–491. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Patil DJ, Dheer DS, Puri G, Konidena A, Dixit A, Gupta R. Psychological appraisal in temporomandibular disorders: A cross-sectional study. Indian J Pain. 2016;30:13–18. [Google Scholar]
  69. Visscher CM, Wesemael-Suijkerbuijk EA, Lobbezoo F. Is the experience of pain in patients with temporomandibular disorder associated with the presence of comorbidity? Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124:459–464. doi: 10.1111/eos.12295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Bertoli E, de Leeuw R. Prevalence of suicidal ideation, depression, and anxiety in chronic temporomandibular disorder patients. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2016;30:296–301. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Bäck K, Hakeberg M, Wide U, Hange D, Dahlström L. Orofacial pain and its relationship with oral health-related quality of life and psychological distress in middle-aged women. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020;78:74–80. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1661512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Huttunen J, Qvintus V, Suominen AL, Sipilä K. Role of psychosocial factors on treatment outcome of temporomandibular disorders. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019;77:119–125. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1511057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Jivnani HM, Tripathi S, Shanker R, Singh BP, Agrawal KK, Singhal R. A study to determine the prevalence of temporomandibular disorders in a young adult population and its association with psychological and functional occlusal parameters. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:e445–e449. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lira MR, Lemes da Silva RR, Bataglion C, Aguiar ADS, Greghi SM, Chaves TC. Multiple diagnoses, increased kinesiophobia?—Patients with high kinesiophobia levels showed a greater number of temporomandibular disorder diagnoses. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;44:102054. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Daher CRdM, Cunha LFd, Ferreira APdL, et al. Pain threshold, sleep quality and anxiety levels in individuals with temporomandibular disorders. Rev CEFAC. 2018;20:450–457. [Google Scholar]
  76. Fernandes Azevedo AB, Câmara-Souza MB, Dantas IS, de Resende CMBM, Barbosa GAS. Relationship between anxiety and temporomandibular disorders in dental students. Cranio. 2018;36:300–303. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2017.1361053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Natu VP, Yap AU, Su MH, Irfan Ali NM, Ansari A. Temporomandibular disorder symptoms and their association with quality of life, emotional states and sleep quality in South-East Asian youths. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:756–763. doi: 10.1111/joor.12692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nazeri M, Ghahrechahi HR, Pourzare A, et al. Role of anxiety and depression in association with migraine and myofascial pain temporomandibular disorder. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29:583–587. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.244932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Paulino MR, Moreira VG, Lemos GA, Silva PLPd, Bonan PRF, Batista AUD. Prevalência de sinais e sintomas de disfunção temporomandibular em estudantes pré-vestibulandos: associação de fatores emocionais, hábitos parafuncionais e impacto na qualidade de vida [in Portuguese] Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2018;23:173–186. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018231.18952015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Reiter S, Eli I, Mahameed M, et al. Pain catastrophizing and pain persistence in temporomandibular disorder patients. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018;32:309–320. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Sruthi S, Jimsha VK, Srinivasan SV, Daniel JM. Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress in chronic temporomandibular joint disorders patients. J Depress Anxiety. 2018;7:4. [Google Scholar]
  82. Naikoo FA, Chalkoo AH, Ahmad MB, Yaqoob G, Tariq S. Prevalence of anxiety levels in patients with temporomandibular disorder among Kashmiri population. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2017;3:101–103. [Google Scholar]
  83. Reiter S, Eli I, Friedman-Rubin P, Emodi-Perlman A, Ziv-Baran T, Winocur E. Comparing axis II scores according to the RDC/TMD and DC/TMD in Israeli patients. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017;31:323–330. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Su N, Lobbezoo F, van Wijk A, van der Heijden GJ, Visscher CM. Associations of pain intensity and pain-related disability with psychological and socio-demographic factors in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A cross-sectional study at a specialised dental clinic. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44:187–196. doi: 10.1111/joor.12479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tournavitis A, Tortopidis D, Fountoulakis K, Menexes G, Koidis P. Psychopathologic profiles of TMD patients with different pain locations. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30:251–257. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. van Selms MK, Muzalev K, Visscher CM, Koutris M, Bulut M, Lobbezoo F. Are pain-related temporomandibular disorders the product of an interaction between psychological factors and self-reported bruxism? J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017;31:331–338. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Yeung E, Abou-Foul A, Matcham F, Poate T, Fan K. Integration of mental health screening in the management of patients with temporomandibular disorders. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55:594–599. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Buljan D, Savić I, Karlović D. Correlation between anxiety, depression and burning mouth syndrome. Acta Clin Croat. 2008;47:211–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. de Souza FT, Teixeira AL, Amaral TM, et al. Psychiatric disorders in burning mouth syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2012;72:142–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Schiavone V, Adamo D, Ventrella G, et al. Anxiety, depression, and pain in burning mouth syndrome: First chicken or egg? Headache. 2012;52:1019–1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Lopez-Jornet P, Lucero-Berdugo M, Castillo-Felipe C, Zamora Lavella C, Ferrandez-Pujante A, Pons-Fuster A. Assessment of self-reported sleep disturbance and psychological status in patients with burning mouth syndrome. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:1285–1290. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Sevrain M, Brenaut E, Le Toux G, Misery L. Primary burning mouth syndrome: A questionnaire study of neuropathic and psychological components. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2016;17:171–178. doi: 10.1007/s40257-015-0170-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Mitsikostas DD, Ljubisavljevic S, Deligianni CI. Refractory burning mouth syndrome: clinical and paraclinical evaluation, comorbidities, treatment and outcome. J Headache Pain. 2017;18:40. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0745-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Yoo HS, Jin SH, Lee YJ, Song CM, Ji YB, Tae K. The role of psychological factors in the development of burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:374–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Sikora M, Verzak Ž, Matijević M, et al. Anxiety and depression scores in patients with burning mouth syndrome. Psychiatr Danub. 2018;30:466–470. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2018.466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Moura BS, Ferreira NDR, DosSantos MF, Janini MER. Changes in the vibration sensitivity and pressure pain thresholds in patients with burning mouth syndrome. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0197834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Lee YH, Chon S. Burning mouth syndrome in postmenopausal women with self-reported sleep problems. Cranio. 2020;38:221–232. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2018.1512549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Di Stasio D, Candotto V, Serpico R, et al. Depression and distress in burning mouth syndrome: A case control study. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018;32:91–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Adamo D, Sardella A, Varoni E, et al. The association between burning mouth syndrome and sleep disturbance: A case-control multicentre study. Oral Dis. 2018;24:638–649. doi: 10.1111/odi.12807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Yang G, Su S, Jie H, et al. Somatosensory profiling of patients with burning mouth syndrome and correlations with psychologic factors. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2019;33:278–286. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Le Bris V, Chastaing M, Schollhammer M, Brenaut E, Misery L. Usefulness of psychiatric intervention in a joint consultation for the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: A monocentric retrospective study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99:813–817. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Adamo D, Pecoraro G, Fortuna G, et al. Assessment of oral health-related quality of life, measured by OHIP-14 and GOHAI, and psychological profiling in burning mouth syndrome: A case-control clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2020;47:42–52. doi: 10.1111/joor.12864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Bakhtiari S, Khalighi HR, Azimi S, Alavi K, Ayoobi Valoogerdi H, Namazi Z. Correlation between burning mouth syndrome and anxiety in the elderly inmates of Sanitaria in Tehran. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2010;4:37–41. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2010.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. van Seventer R, Serpell M, Bach FW, et al. Relationships between changes in pain severity and other patient-reported outcomes: An analysis in patients with posttraumatic peripheral neuropathic pain. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Smith JG, Elias LA, Yilmaz Z, et al. The psychosocial and affective burden of posttraumatic neuropathy following injuries to the trigeminal nerve. J Orofac Pain. 2013;27:293–303. doi: 10.11607/jop.1056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Wu TH, Hu LY, Lu T, et al. Risk of psychiatric disorders following trigeminal neuralgia: A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. J Headache Pain. 2015;16:64. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0548-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Zakrzewska JM, Wu J, Mon-Williams M, Phillips N, Pavitt SH. Evaluating the impact of trigeminal neuralgia. Pain. 2017;158:1166–1174. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Tan CY, Shahrizaila N, Goh KJ. Clinical characteristics, pain, and quality of life experiences of trigeminal neuralgia in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017;31:e15–e20. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Heinskou TB, Maarbjerg S, Wolfram F, et al. Favourable prognosis of trigeminal neuralgia when enrolled in a multidisciplinary management program—A two-year prospective real-life study. J Headache Pain. 2019;20:23. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-0973-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Chang B, Zhu W, Li S. Effects of depression and anxiety on microvascular decompression outcome for trigeminal neuralgia patients. World Neurosurg. 2019;128:e556–e561. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Godazandeh K, Martinez Sosa S, Wu J, Zakrzewska JM. Trigeminal neuralgia: Comparison of characteristics and impact in patients with or without multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;34:41–46. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Mongini F, Ciccone G, Ceccarelli M, Baldi I, Ferrero L. Muscle tenderness in different types of facial pain and its relation to anxiety and depression: A cross-sectional study on 649 patients. Pain. 2007;131:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Baad-Hansen L, Leijon G, Svensson P, List T. Comparison of clinical findings and psychosocial factors in patients with atypical odontalgia and temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2008;22:7–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Castro AR, Siqueira SR, Perissinotti DM, Siqueira JT. Psychological evaluation and cope with trigeminal neuralgia and temporomandibular disorder. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2008;66:716–719. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2008000500021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Choi SH, Kim KS, Kim ME. Pain disability of orofacial pain patients. J Oral Med Pain. 2009;34:217–225. [Google Scholar]
  116. Kim HI, Lee JY, Kim YK, Kho HS. Clinical and psychological characteristics of TMD patients with trauma history. Oral Dis. 2010;16:188–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01626.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Takenoshita M, Sato T, Kato Y, et al. Psychiatric diagnoses in patients with burning mouth syndrome and atypical odontalgia referred from psychiatric to dental facilities. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:699–705. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S12605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Mačianskytė D, Janužis G, Kubilius R, Adomaitienė V, Ščiupokas A. Associations between chronic pain and depressive symptoms in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Medicina (Kaunas) 2011;47:386–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Taiminen T, Kuusalo L, Lehtinen L, et al. Psychiatric (axis I) and personality (axis II) disorders in patients with burning mouth syndrome or atypical facial pain. Scand J Pain. 2011;2:155–160. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Komiyama O, Obara R, Uchida T, et al. Pain intensity and psychosocial characteristics of patients with burning mouth syndrome and trigeminal neuralgia. J Oral Sci. 2012;54:321–327. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.54.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Cioffi I, Perrotta S, Ammendola L, et al. Social impairment of individuals suffering from different types of chronic orofacial pain. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0027-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Brailo V, Zakrzewska JM. Grading the intensity of nondental orofacial pain: Identification of cutoff points for mild, moderate, and severe pain. J Pain Res. 2015;8:95–104. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S75192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Ballegaard V, Thede-Schmidt-Hansen P, Svensson P, Jensen R. Are headache and temporomandibular disorders related? A blinded study. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:832–841. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01597.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Tu TTH, Miura A, Shinohara Y, et al. Evaluating burning mouth syndrome as a comorbidity of atypical odontalgia: The impact on pain experiences. Pain Pract. 2018;18:580–586. doi: 10.1111/papr.12647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Melek LN, Smith JG, Karamat A, Renton T. Comparison of the neuropathic pain symptoms and psychosocial impacts of trigeminal neuralgia and painful posttraumatic trigeminal neuropathy. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2019;33:77–88. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Streffer ML, Büchi S, Mörgeli H, Galli U, Ettlin D. PRISM (pictorial representation of illness and self measure): A novel visual instrument to assess pain and suffering in orofacial pain patients. J Orofac Pain. 2009;23:140–146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. McMillan AS, Wong MC, Zheng J, Luo Y, Lam CL. Widespread pain symptoms and psychological distress in southern Chinese with orofacial pain. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:2–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02023.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Wan KY, McMillan AS, Wong MC. Orofacial pain symptoms and associated disability and psychosocial impact in community-dwelling and institutionalized elderly in Hong Kong. Community Dent Health. 2012;29:110–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Ligthart L, Gerrits MM, Boomsma DI, Penninx BW. Anxiety and depression are associated with migraine and pain in general: An investigation of the interrelationships. J Pain. 2013;14:363–370. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Sipilä K, Mäki P, Laajala A, Taanila A, Joukamaa M, Veijola J. Association of depressiveness with chronic facial pain: A longitudinal study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:644–649. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2012.704067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Gerrits MMJG, van Oppen P, van Marwijk HWJ, Penninx BWJH, van der Horst HE. Pain and the onset of depressive and anxiety disorders. Pain. 2014;155:53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. List T, Leijon G, Helkimo M, Oster A, Dworkin SF, Svensson P. Clinical findings and psychosocial factors in patients with atypical odontalgia: A case-control study. J Orofac Pain. 2007;21:89–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Miura A, Tu TTH, Shinohara Y, et al. Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with Atypical Odontalgia. J Psychosom Res. 2018;104:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Tang Y, Ma L, Li N, et al. Percutaneous trigeminal ganglion radiofrequency thermocoagulation alleviates anxiety and depression disorders in patients with classic trigeminal neuralgia: A cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e5379. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Tokura T, Kimura H, Ito M, et al. Temperament and character profiles of patients with burning mouth syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78:495–498. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Marino R, Picci RL, Ferro G, Carezana C, Gandolfo S, Pentenero M. Peculiar alexithymic traits in burning mouth syndrome: Case-control study. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:1799–1805. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1416-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Mousavi SH, Sekula RF, Gildengers A, Gardner P, Lunsford LD. Concomitant depression and anxiety negatively affect pain outcomes in surgically managed young patients with trigeminal neuralgia: Long-term clinical outcome. Surg Neurol Int. 2016;7:98. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.194145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. das Neves de Araújo Lima E, Barbosa NG, Dos Santos AC, et al. Comparative analysis of psychological, hormonal, and genetic factors between burning mouth syndrome and secondary oral burning. Pain Med. 2016;17:1602–1611. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Braud A, Boucher Y. The relationship between the clinical features of idiopathic burning mouth syndrome and self-perceived quality of life. J Oral Sci. 2016;58:475–481. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.15-0683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992;50:133–149. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Goesling J, Clauw DJ, Hassett AL. Pain and depression: An integrative review of neurobiological and psychological factors. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013;15:421. doi: 10.1007/s11920-013-0421-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Dersh J, Polatin PB, Gatchel RJ. Chronic pain and psychopathology: Research findings and theoretical considerations. Psychosom Med. 2002;64:773–786. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000024232.11538.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Renton T, Durham J, Aggarwal VR. The classification and differential diagnosis of orofacial pain. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012;12:569–576. doi: 10.1586/ern.12.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Haviv Y, Zini A, Etzioni Y, et al. The impact of chronic orofacial pain on daily life: The vulnerable patient and disruptive pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Okeson JP. The classification of orofacial pains. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2008;20:133–144. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2007.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Vickers ER, Boocock H. Chronic orofacial pain is associated with psychological morbidity and negative personality changes: A comparison to the general population. Aust Dent J. 2005;50:21–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00081.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Porto F, de Leeuw R, Evans DR, et al. Differences in psychosocial functioning and sleep quality between idiopathic continuous orofacial neuropathic pain patients and chronic masticatory muscle pain patients. J Orofac Pain. 2011;25:117–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Wieckiewicz M, Zietek M, Smardz J, Zenczak-Wieckiewicz D, Grychowska N. Mental status as a common factor for masticatory muscle pain: A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2017;8:646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Berger M, Szalewski L, Bakalczuk M, Bakalczuk G, Bakalczuk S, Szkutnik J. Association between estrogen levels and temporomandibular disorders: A systematic literature review. Prz Menopauzalny. 2015;14:260–270. doi: 10.5114/pm.2015.56538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Cole HA, Carlson CR. Mind-Body Considerations in orofacial pain. Dent Clin. 2018;62:683–694. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Gormsen L, Rosenberg R, Bach FW, Jensen TS. Depression, anxiety, health-related quality of life and pain in patients with chronic fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain. 2010;14:127.e1–127.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Mann CJ. Observational research methods. Research design II: Cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emerg Med J. 2003;20:54. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.1.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Fillingim RB, Ohrbach R, Greenspan JD, et al. Psychological factors associated with development of TMD: The OPPERA prospective cohort study. J Pain. 2013;14(suppl 12):T75–T90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Aggarwal VR, Macfarlane GJ, Farragher TM, McBeth J. Risk factors for onset of chronic oro-facial pain–results of the North Cheshire oro-facial pain prospective population study. Pain. 2010;149:354–359. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Hooten WM. Chronic pain and mental health disorders: Shared neural mechanisms, epidemiology, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:955–970. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Davidson RJ, Abercrombie H, Nitschke JB, Putnam K. Regional brain function, emotion and disorders of emotion. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9:228–234. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)80032-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Del Boca FK, Noll JA. Truth or consequences: The validity of self-report data in health services research on addictions. Addiction. 2000;95:347–360. doi: 10.1080/09652140020004278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983. [Google Scholar]
  159. Bieling PJ, Antony MM, Swinson RP. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait version: Structure and content re-examined. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36:777–788. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Herrmann C. International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale–a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res. 1997;42:17–41. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00216-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Klasser GD, Goulet JP, De Laat A, Manfredini D. Classification of orofacial pain. In: Farah S, Balasubramaniam R, McCullough MJ, editors. Contemporary Oral Medicine. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  162. Daniel HC, Narewska J, Serpell M, Hoggart B, Johnson R, Rice AS. Comparison of psychological and physical function in neuropathic pain and nociceptive pain: Implications for cognitive behavioral pain management programs. Eur J Pain. 2008;12:731–741. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Ghurye S, McMillan R. Orofacial pain—An update on diagnosis and management. Br Dent J. 2017;223:639–647. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Davis CE, Stockstill JW, Stanley WD, Wu Q. Pain-related worry in patients with chronic orofacial pain. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145:722–730. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Gao J, Chen L, Zhou J, Peng J. A case-control study on etiological factors involved in patients with burning mouth syndrome. J Oral Pathol Med. 2009;38:24–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2008.00708.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache are provided here courtesy of MRE Press

RESOURCES