Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Oct 19;18(10):e0292893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292893

Dynamic changes in the suitable areas for the pinewood nematode in the Sichuan–Chongqing Region of China

Hongqun Li 1, Xiaolong Peng 2, Peng Jiang 2, Ligang Xing 1,*, Xieping Sun 1
Editor: Mohammed Magdy Hamed3
PMCID: PMC10586667  PMID: 37856535

Abstract

The pine wood nematode (PWN), one of the largest alien forestry pests in China, has caused numerous deaths of conifer forests in Europe and Asia, and is spreading to other suitable areas worldwide. Information on the spatial distribution of the PWN can provide important information for the management of this species. Here, the current and future geographical distributions of PWN were simulated in the Sichuan–Chongqing region of China in detail based on the MaxEnt model. The results indicated excellent prediction performance, with an area under curve score of more than 0.9. The key factors selected were the altitude, maximum temperature of the warmest month, annual precipitation, precipitation of the wettest quarter, and minimum temperature of the coldest month, with thresholds of < 400 m, > 37.5 °C, 1100–1250 mm, 460–530 mm and > 4.0 °C, respectively, indicating that the PWN can live in low-altitude, warm, and humid areas. The suitable region for the PWN is mainly concentrated in the metropolitan area, northeast of Chongqing, and the southeastern and eastern parts of Sichuan Province. Most importantly, in addition to their actual distribution area, the newly identified suitably distribution areas A, B, C, and D for the coming years and E, F, G, and H for the period–2041–2060 (2050s) should be strictly monitored for the presence of PWNs. Altogether, the suitable distribution ranges of the PWN in the Sichuan-Chongqing region show an increasing trend; therefore, owing to its inability to disperse by itself, human activities involving pine trees and vectors of the Japanese pine sawyer should be intensively controlled to prevent the PWN from spreading to these newly discovered suitable areas.

Introduction

Pine wilt disease (PWD), mainly caused by the pine wood nematode (PWN)(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus), is one of the most notable alien forestry pests of Pinus spp. Worldwide [1]. The disease usually results in the mortality of infected trees in approximately 40 days, because the PWN can reproduce quickly and destroy the vascular system of the entire tree once inside [2, 3]. An entire pine forest can even be completely destroyed in a few years once infested, which affirmatively causes huge economic, ecological, and social losses in agriculture and forestry, so the PWD is called the "cancer" or the "bird flu" of the pine tree [4]. The PWN, the causal agent of the PWD originating from North America, spread remotely by way of the timber trade to Japan first, from where it spread to more than 40 countries, such as South Korea and China in Asia, and Germany, Scandinavia, France, Poland, etc., in Europe [5, 6]. In China, the PWN has rapidly spread to 18 provinces or cities) and 588 counties (cities and districts), and has destroyed 0.65 million hm2 of pine forests; 60 million hm2 has been threatened by the PWN since it was first discovered in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China, in 1982 [3]. Few effective methods have been found to control its spread; therefore, it is still spreading to other suitable areas through growing trade and transportation, which has attracted the attention of society [5]. Consequently, local governments must scientifically assess the potential hazards of PWN invasion and take measures to prevent its spread.

Species distribution models (SDMs) have been widely used for the protection of endangered species, priority evaluation of reserve design, diffusion of alien invasive species, and so on [7, 8]. Now, habitat fragmentation and invasion by alien species are the primary factors leading to biodiversity loss [9]. Regarding the spread of the PWN, one important method of stopping alien organisms from causing harm to the invaded area is to control their entry into the areas suitable for their survival [2, 8]. Some studies have indicated that the early control of alien species is more efficacious and affordable than prevention and control after invasion [10, 11]. As a result, the spatial distribution of the PWN under current and future conditions must be assessed as early as possible so that eradication and prevention measures can be formulated in advance. Among the various SDMs, the maximum entropy modelling (MaxEnt) model has proven to be better than other SDMs [12, 13]. Over the past decade, some scientists assessed the potential distribution of PWN in Chongqing City or Sichuan Province alone using known distribution records together with layers of environmental variables [11, 14], but there is a lack of similar research focusing on Sichuan-Chongqing together. Therefore, these above-mentioned related studies are relatively incomplete, which are mainly reflected in: (1) the relatively small areas studied, because the MaxEnt model can only achieve higher accuracy on a large scale and has a large error on a small scale, which could be because a higher spatial scale means that more species information can be obtained [15, 16]; (2) the lack of accurate location analysis of increases and decreases in distribution, resulting in difficulty in laying out the scientific investigations and control pest infestations [17]; (3) a lack of innovation in research methods, compared with our new method that uses the newly introduced maximum Youden index and the average habitat suitability based on 10 replicates by cross-validation [18, 19]; (4) only one specific global climate model (GCM) is used, making it difficult to explain related uncertainties owing to a lack of experimental verification of prediction results from multiple GCMs [11, 14]; and (5) a lack of multicollinearity analysis among environmental variables, which is regarded as an error source [20, 21]. Moreover, climate change, in terms of temperature and precipitation, will affect the geographical distribution of animals and plants [13], increase the invasion of alien species, and increase biodiversity losses [11]. Global warming is expected to increase the invasiveness of alien species by interfering with the structure and function of ecosystems and reducing their resistance [2224]. Here, the current and future geographical distributions of PWN were simulated using the MaxEnt model with 421 known coordinates and 20 environmental layers in the Sichuan–Chongqing region with two GCMs. The aims are to (1) determine the potentially suitable distribution of the PWN under current environmental conditions; (2) identify areas with increased and decreased suitability up to the 2050s; and (3) clarify some key factors that may limit its potential distributions, ultimately supplying objective measures for hindering the spread of this species.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study area consists of Sichuan Province and the Chongqing Municipality of China, which are distributed between 95.917°–111.301°E and 25.271°–34.839°N in Southwest China. In the past, Chongqing belonged to Sichuan Province; and then it was separated from Sichuan Province and established as the fourth municipality of China on June 18, 1997. Our study area includes the main Hengduan and Daba mountain ranges, the Chengdu Plain, and the Chongqing Hills in China. The region has a mountainous, subtropical, humid climate. The annual mean temperature varies from –10.5 to 22.2 °C and the annual mean precipitation varies from 429 to 1817 mm [25]. In addition, the study area is suitable for the survival of pine trees, especially Pinus massoniana, which are the main objects of PWN damage.

Species distribution samples

The main distribution point data were obtained in three ways: (1) the occurrence data of the PWN were collected from our team’s recent field investigations in Chongqing using a GPS receiver; (2) some geo-names of the points at which this species existed were acquired from the Sichuan Forestry and Grassland Bureau in 2019 (http://lcj.sc.gov.cn/scslyt/gsgg/2019); and (3) other geo-names were provided by the Chongqing Forest Disease and Pest Control Station of China, which only provided small place names where pine trees were infested by PWN. Their coordinates were obtained using the Gaode Pick Coordinate System (https://lbs.amap.com/tools/picker) or the GeoNames geographical database (http://www.geonames.org/). To avoid spatial autocorrelation [20, 26], duplicate points were deleted and only one existing point in each grid was retained. Thus, a total of 421 existing points, including 192 points in Chongqing and 229 points in Sichuan Province, were ultimately retained after checking their locations. Based on the above data, the distributional points of PWN were saved in the CSV format based on the requirements of the Maxent model.

Current environmental data

Anomalous changes in temperature and precipitation influence the geographical distribution of species [13, 21]. To determine which environmental variables over the period 1970–2000 most strongly influenced the distribution of the PWN, we selected 20 environmental variables, including 19 bioclimatic variables and one altitude variable in our model (Table 2), with a spatial resolution of approximately 1 km2, downloaded from global climate data (http://www.worldclim.org). Finally, 20 environmental variables were extracted from the boundary maps of the Sichuan–Chongqing region based on the global raster data in ArcGIS 10.2. Additionally, a China vector map was acquired from the free spatial data of diva-gis (http://swww.diva-gis.org/Data).

Filtering of environmental factors

As high multicollinearity among the environmental variables is considered as an error source [13, 20], to overcome this multicollinearity, we extracted values from all 20 environmental variables combined with 421 presence points in ArcGIS 10.2 and performed the relevant analysis. Based on the Pearson correlation coefficient (/r/ ≥ 0.8) in SPSS 21.0 and taking into consideration the importance of each environmental variable devoted to predictor contributions, we excluded several variables that made a small contribution to the model and only retained those that made a large contribution to the model among highly cross-correlated variables (/r/≥0.8), and except for the above situations, all other factors are kept. Finally, eight remaining variables were retained and used for modeling (Table 2). Meanwhile, to meet the needs of this Maxent model, all remaining variables were converted to the asc format.

Future environmental data

The representative concentration pathways (RCPs), which are more scientific and closer to real climate change due to the consideration of the impact of various strategies to deal with climate change on future greenhouse gas emissions [27], were announced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the Fifth IPCC Assessment Report (AR5). The scenarios of the RCPs at 30 arc-second resolution, available for free from the WorldClim database in 2050 (average for 2041–2060) (https://www.worldclim.org/data/v1.4/cmip5_30s.html) [28], include four future representative concentration pathways, namely RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5, which represent greenhouse gas emissions with radiative forcing values of 2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5 w/m2 in the year of 2100. In this study, the future geographic distribution ranges of PWN were simulated using two GCMs (such as BCC-CSM1.1 and GISS-E2-R) for three RCPs representing low (RCP2.6), middle (RCP4.5), and high (RCP8.5) greenhouse gas emissions in the 2050s, which have been widely used in previous studies [29, 30]. According to our hypothesis, one elevation variable remained unchanged under the different environmental conditions. Finally, eight environmental variables similar to those under the current conditions were imported directly into the MaxEnt model for future conditions.

Predicting potential distribution

The current and future geographical distributions of PWN were simulated based on the MaxEnt model (Version 3.4.1, http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~schapire/maxent/) because this model performs better than other SDMs [21, 27]. The MaxEnt model predicts the geographical distribution of species based on presence-only data, along with layers of surrounding variables, according to maximum entropy theory [12]. The MaxEnt model incorporates interactions between variables and can handle categorical and continuous environmental variables [8, 31]. In addition, its demand for computer configurations is lower, operation is more convenient, and predicted results are more stable [14]. During modeling, 75% of all occurrence data were randomly chosen to train the model, and the remaining 25% were utilized for testing [13, 32]. Simultaneously, the “Do jackknife to measure variables importance” and " Create response curves” commands were also checked with a tick in the model’s interface, along with default settings for other parameters, because these default settings are enough to ensure better the models’ effectiveness [33]. To ensure the stability of the results, the model was run with 10 replicates by cross-validation, and the average habitat suitability was considered as the final result in logistic format and asc types [31, 34]. For further analysis, the final result was converted from raster format in ASCII to Raster in ArcGIS 10.2, and the cell values of the predicted map ranged from 0 (lowest habitat quality) to 1 (highest habitat quality) for this species. Owing to the need for binary maps, continuous suitability index maps were converted into suitable and unsuitable areas according to the maximum Youden index [18, 19]. The maximum Youden index (specificity+sensitivity-1) is usually used to be the cutoff point, which is an advantage over other threshold value in transforming the continuous area into ‘suitable areas’ and ‘unsuitable areas’ [18]. According to previous Literature [17], a suitable area is assigned a value of 1 and an unsuitable area is assigned a value of 2 under the current conditions, while under future conditions, a suitable area is assigned a value of 3 and an unsuitable area is assigned a value of 4. Then, two sets of data from the current and future conditions were multiplied in ArcGIS 10.2 so that a cell value of 3 indicated an unsuitable area and 8 signified a suitable area for this species, while 4 indicated an increased suitability area and 6 signified a decreased suitability area under future conditions. Finally, habitat areas were computed after properly projected coordinates.

Model performance and influencing factors

The prediction performances were assessed using an AUC value equal to the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve acquired directly from the analysis of the MaxEnt model, which is widely utilized in the evaluation of predictive power for many models and is considered to be the best evaluation index [13, 32, 35]. The AUC values ranged from 0.5 to 1.0 [13]. An AUC value equal to 0.50 suggests that the prediction performance is not better than that of a random model, whereas a value equal to 1.0 indicates the best performance [8, 13]. Specifically, AUC values of 0.5–0.7 indicate low performance, 0.7–0.9 signify moderate performance, and more than 0.9 suggest excellent performance [33, 36]. Finally, based on predictor contributions, permutation importance, and regularized training gain, we could estimate the relative influence of individual predictors on species habitat suitability [33, 34, 37]. In addition, a Maxent-generated response curve was automatically produced using the Maxent model to analyze the relationships between environmental variables and the probability of occurrence [36].

Result

Modeling evaluation and current geographic distribution

In this study, all the average AUCs of model training and testing were above 0.9 for the prediction performances under climate change conditions (Table 1). These results indicate that all performances were excellent for the prediction of this species’ distribution. The final potential distribution map was reclassified into suitable and unsuitable areas based on the maximum Youden index (0.202). The suitable geographic distribution of the PWN in the study region was mainly concentrated in the metropolitan area, northeastern Chongqing, and southeastern and eastern Sichuan Province; with the exception of four newly discovered areas (Fig 1), the other suitable distribution areas were covered by many distribution points, implying that the prediction results based on the presence of the PWN were consistent with the actual distribution area. Most importantly, the above-mentioned newly discovered areas A (Guangan, Yingshan, Pengan, Yilong, Bazhong, and Pingchang), B (Longchang, south of Neijiang and Rongxian, southeastern Weiyuan, western Luxian, and Rongchang in Chongqing), C (Yubei, Beibei, southeastern Hechuan, Shapingba, Jiangbei, Nanan, and Bishan), and D (Dianjiang and Liangping) belonged to suitable distribution areas predicted by the Maxent model and should be strictly monitored, even if few occurrence points were found in these locations The analysis showed that suitable and unsuitable areas occupied 12.68% and 87.32% of the entire study area, respectively. Suitable and unsuitable areas in Sichuan Province accounted for 8.23% and 91.77% of the area, respectively, whereas in Chongqing, they only amounted to 38.90% and 61.10%, respectively.

Table 1. Modeling prediction precision of AUC in the periods of 1970–2000 and 2041–2060 (2050s).

GCMs Periods Training AUC Test AUC AUC of random prediction
Current 1970–2000 0.9403±0.0036 0.9414±0.0071 0.5
BCC-CSM1.1-rcp2.6 2050sa 0.9364±0.0012 0.9307±0.0149 0.5
BCC-CSM1.1-rcp4.5 0.9349±0.0016 0.9293±0.0191 0.5
BCC-CSM1.1-rcp8.5 0.9338±0.0007 0.9283±0.0090 0.5
GISS-E2-R-rcp2.6 0.9368±0.0012 0.9321±0.0141 0.5
GISS-E2-R-rcp4.5 0.9407±0.0011 0.9361±0.0110 0.5
GISS-E2-R-rcp8.5 0.9369±0.0012 0.9310±0.0122 0.5

a2050s = average for the period of 2041–2060

Fig 1. The potential geographic distribution of B. xylophilus in the periods of 1970–2000.

Fig 1

China vector map was acquired from the free spatial data of diva-gis (http://swww.diva-gis.org/Data) and the Sichuan–Chongqing Region of China was extracted from it.

Environmental variable assessment and their threshold

Among the eight environmental variables, based on percent contributions, the altitude variable had the highest score (Table 2), indicating that this variable had a significant effect on the distribution of the PWN under the current conditions, followed by the maximum temperature of the warmest month (bio05), at 34.9%. The cumulative contribution of these two parameters reached 70.8%. The permutation importance represents the strength of the model’s dependence on a certain variable on the training existence and background data. The larger the value, the greater the dependence of the model on this variable [34]. Therefore, the top four environmental variables in terms of permutation importance were the maximum temperature of the warmest month (bio05), annual precipitation (bio12), minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio06), and precipitation of the wettest quarter (bio16). The cumulative permutation importance of these four parameters was 80.2%. Based on the jackknife test (Fig 2), the maximum temperature of the hottest month (bio-05), minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio-06), and altitude were the top three contributors to the distribution of the PWN relative to other environmental variables. Overall, the five main factors affecting the potential geographical distribution of PWN were altitude, maximum temperature of the warmest month (bio05), annual precipitation (bio12), precipitation of the wettest quarter (bio16), and minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio06).

Table 2. Environmental factors used in this study, their contribution, and permutation importance under current environmental conditions.

Code Description Percent contribution Permutation importance Code Description Percent contribution Permutation importance
Alt Altitude 35.9 1.0 bio06 Min. temperature of coldest month 4.6 14.9
bio05 Max. temperature of warmest month 34.9 36.3 bio12 Annual precipitation 2.7 17.5
bio14 Precipitation of driest month 12.8 6.0 bio09 Mean temperature of driest quarter 2.2 9.5
bio03 Isothermality 4.9 3.2 bio16 Precipitation of wettest quarter 2.1 11.5

The highlighted variables, selected based on their contributions and permutation importance, were the five main influencing factors.

Fig 2. Jackknife test for assessing the weight of each environmental variables on the geospatial distribution of B. xylophilus under the current condition.

Fig 2

To further clarify the thresholds of the main environmental variables under the current conditions and eliminate the correlations between the above-mentioned key factors, these five environmental variables were individually imported into the MaxEnt model to model and plot the response curves of the probability and environmental variables. The results indicate that the threshold values of these five key variables (probability of presence >0.5) were: altitude of < 400 m, maximum temperature of the warmest month (bio05) of >37.5 °C, annual precipitation (bio12) from 1100 to 1250 mm, minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio06) of >4.0 °C and precipitation of the wettest quarter (bio16) from 460 to 530 mm (Figures are not shown).

Potential distribution pattern under future environmental conditions

Based on the maximum Youden indices from the different GCMs (Table 3), the final potential distribution map was classified into suitable and unsuitable areas. In the 2050s, the prediction results showed similar distribution areas in the suitable geographic distribution of the PWN in the Sichuan–Chongqing region of China; however, compared with the current suitable distribution areas, local areas showed an increasing or decreasing trend in the future. Taken together, the suitable distribution areas of PWN in the study area showed an increasing trend, because the area with an increase was greater than the area with a decrease (Table 3). More importantly, in the 2050s four newly discovered suitable distribution areas, for example, E (Langzhong, eastern Nanbu, northeastern Nanchong, and southeastern Changxi), F (southeastern Zizhong, central Neijiang, and northwestern Rongchang in Chongqing), G (northeastern Yaan, southwestern Mingshan, northeastern Hongya, central Jiajiang, and northeastern Leshan), and H (Luxian, western Hanjiang, southwestern Yongchuan, and southeastern Dazu in Chongqing), were identified as increasingly suitable areas by the Maxent model, indicating that the suitable habitat areas in the Sichuan–Chongqing regions are predicted to increase gradually to 1.26–2.58% in BCC-CSM1.1 and 0.72–3.44% in GISS-E2-R by the 2050s (Table 3). Consequently, in the Sichuan–Chongqing region of China, the four newly discovered suitable areas should be strictly monitored (Fig 3).

Table 3. Changes in the suitable habitat for B. xylophilus by the 2041–2060 period (2050s).

Climate scenarios GCMs Maximum Youden index Decreased suitable habitat Increased suitable habitat Total habitat change
Area/km2 Percent/% Area/km2 Percent/% Area/km2 Percent/%
RCP2.6 BCC-CSM1.1 0.1765 1585.65 0.26 17219.20 2.84 15633.55 2.58
GISS-E2-R 0.1647 2439.15 0.40 11045.60 1.82 8606.45 1.42
RCP4.5 BCC-CSM1.1 0.1827 3325.98 0.55 10978.2 1.81 7652.22 1.26
GISS-E2-R 0.1603 3998.63 0.66 8357.38 1.38 4358.75 0.72
RCP8.5 BCC-CSM1.1 0.1693 2304.31 0.38 15095.8 2.49 12791.49 2.11
GISS-E2-R 0.1920 1662.59 0.27 22522.7 3.71 20860.11 3.44

Fig 3. The decreased and increased areas of suitable potential distribution for B. xylophilus to the period of 2050s.

Fig 3

China vector map was acquired from the free spatial data of diva-gis (http://swww.diva-gis.org/Data) and the Sichuan–Chongqing Region of China was extracted from it.

Discussion

PWD, caused by the PWN (B. xylophilus), is one of the greatest threats to pine trees and has spread worldwide, leading to tremendous economic, ecological, and biodiversity losses in its invaded areas in more than 40 countries [5]. To date, few effective and economical methods have been developed to control its spread; therefore, it is still spreading to other suitable habitats. Moreover, very little is known about the direction in which PWN expanded to in the Sichuan–Chongqing region and the main factors that limit the geographic distribution of this species. Recently, with the development of biostatistics and applied ecology, SDMs, especially ecological models such as Gam, Cart, GARP, and MaxEnt, have become powerful for predicting the geographic distribution of species using only animal appearance point data, attaining satisfactory results [7, 31]. Of these models, the MaxEnt model can consistently behave better using less sampled data than other niche models, and is widely utilized to estimate the geographic distribution of suitable areas for species in many fields [27, 31]. Previously, our team predicted the potential distribution of the PWN in Chongqing municipality, China, under climate change conditions using the MaxEnt model [11]. Nevertheless, owing to be lack of accurate location analysis to indicate areas of increases and decreases, the prediction results were approximate and difficult to use to effectively prevent and control the distribution of the PWN. In addition, neglecting the correlation analysis based on multicollinearity analysis was regarded as an error source. Moreover, the model was run with ten replicates by cross-validation, and the average habitat suitability was considered as the final result to avoid randomness in single modeling. In this study, we overcame the aforementioned shortcomings, and our models provided satisfactory results for this species, with an average AUC of model training and testing of >0.9, indicating excellent performance under current and future environmental conditions. As shown in Fig 1, under the current conditions, the ideal distribution area of the PWN in the study region was mainly concentrated in metropolitan areas, northeastern Chongqing municipality, and the southeastern and eastern parts of Sichuan Province (Fig 1), which is consistent with the suitable distribution area for the period of 2041–2060 (2050s). Therefore, these areas should be strictly monitored until the 2050s. Most importantly, four newly suitable distribution areas, namely, A, B, C, and D, were identified and should be strictly monitored in the coming years because sporadic points also appeared (Fig 1). In the 2050s, through the newly introduced maximum Youden index [18, 19], four other newly identified suitable distribution areas, E, F, G, and H, were identified distinctly as being increasingly suitable areas (Fig 2) and should be strictly monitored. In summary, these maps may be utilized to lay out field investigations and projects in more detail until the 2050s, with limited research funds and manual labor. In addition, the spread of the PWN, with almost no dispersal ability by itself, between pine trees requires an insect vector, that is, the Japanese pine sawyer (Monochamus alternatus), which is the most important carrier of the PWN over relatively short distances. Over long distances, human-mediated activities are responsible for the spread of the PWN [2, 38]. Consequently, in addition to the newly discovered suitable areas, the original suitable areas in red should be strictly managed to prevent PWN from entering these newly discovered suitable areas, for example, by using pitfalls to catch the insect vector, burning trees with symptoms of PWD, and prohibiting conveyance of infested lumber or packaging, especially relating to pine trees.

The geographical distribution of a species is primarily affected by the temperature, rainfall, and terrain [21, 39]. Robinet et al. (2009) [40] found that the key variables identified were the July mean temperature (TJul ≥21.3 °C) and January mean temperature (TJan ≥ –10 °C), which markedly affect the potential distribution of the PWN. In the present study, the five main factors affecting the potential geographical distribution of the PWN were an altitude of ˂ 400 m, maximum temperature of the warmest month (bio05) of > 37.5 °C, annual precipitation (bio12) of 1100–1250 mm, precipitation in the wettest quarter (bio16) of 460–530 mm, and minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio06) of > 4.0 °C. These results are similar to those of previous studies [2, 11, 40]. The suitable habitat of the PWN was mainly concentrated in low-altitude areas (< 400 m), which supports the fact that no PWNs have been found in the high-altitude areas of Sichuan Province adjacent to Tibet (the highest place in the world; Fig 1). This may be because humans frequently participate in pine-related activities, such as the transportation of infected wood and packaging boxes, especially those related to infected pine trees, which supports past reports that human-related diffusion plays an important role in the spread of the PWN [40]. A maximum temperature of the warmest month of > 37.5 °C is closely related to the Japanese pine sawyer, because it belongs to typical tropical and subtropical groups [41] and facilitates its spread over long distances [5, 11]. The annual precipitation (bio12), precipitation of the wettest quarter (bio16), and minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio06) of 1100–1250 mm, 460–530 mm, and > 4.0 °C, respectively, indicated that the PWN lives in warm and humid areas, which may also improve the eclosion rate of the Japanese pine sawyer, the main carrier of the PWN. This was consistent with previous research [2, 4, 14]. The minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio06) was 4 °C. Below this temperature, pine trees will grow weak and their resistance declines; once the PWN is transmitted to host trees by the Japanese pine sawyer in such areas, they are easily infected and PWD occurs [14]. A January mean air temperature of –10 °C has been reported as the northern limit for the geographic distribution of the Japanese pine sawyer in China [42]. This supports previous findings that the number of Japanese pine sawyers increases after ice and snow disasters in Southeast China [43].

Conclusion

The suitable distribution areas of the PWN under current and future conditions were mainly concentrated in metropolitan areas, northeastern Chongqing, and southeastern and eastern Sichuan Province. Most importantly, in addition to the actual distribution area, four suitable distribution areas, A, B, C, and D, were newly discovered and should be strictly monitored for the presence of PWNs in the coming years. Up to the 2050s, the suitable distribution areas of the PWN showed an increasing trend. Four newly discovered future suitable distribution areas, E, F, G, and H, were identified. The key factors identified were an altitude of < 400 m, maximum temperature of the warmest month (bio05) of > 37.5 °C, annual precipitation (bio12) of 1100–1250 mm, precipitation of the wettest quarter (bio16) of 460–530 mm, and minimum temperature of the coldest month (bio06) of > 4.0 °C, indicating that the PWN can live in low-altitude, warm, and humid areas. Altogether, human activities related to pine trees and the Japanese pine sawyer vector in the Sichuan–Chongqing region should be intensively controlled to prevent PWD from spreading to these newly discovered suitable areas.

Acknowledgments

We are particularly grateful to the Chongqing Forest Disease and Pest Control Station for their assistance with data collection. We are particularly grateful to Simeng Zhang for their support and assistance with data collection. Two anonymous referees are thanked for their critical suggestions, which improved the manuscript’s quality. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.

Data Availability

Data Availability Statement: The data of all 20 environmental variables were freely downloaded from global climate data (http://www.worldclim.org). Some data regarding the points at which this species existed were acquired from the Sichuan Forestry and Grassland Bureau in 2019 (http://lcj.sc.gov.cn/scslyt/gsgg/2019) and provided by the Chongqing Forest Disease and Pest Control Station of China.

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870515), Excellent Achievement Transformation Project in Universities of Chongqing (KJZH17132), Rescue and Protection Projects for Rare and Endangered Wild Fauna and Flora in Chongqing Municipality (2023-2) and Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0591). The funders played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Kim BN, Ji HK, Ahn JY, Kim S, Min J. A short review of the pinewood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Toxicol Env Heal Sci. 2020; 12(4): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Robinet C, Opstal NV, Baker R, Roques A. Applying a spread model to identify the entry points from which the pine wood nematode, the vector of pine wilt disease, would spread most rapidly across Europe. Biol Invasions. 2011; 13: 2981–2995. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ye JR. Epidemic status of pine wilt disease in China and its prevention and control techniques and counter measures. Sci Silvae Sin. 2019; 55(9): 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cheng G, Lu Q, Feng YM, Li YX, Wang YL,Zhang XY. Temporal and spatial dynamic pattern of pine wilt disease distribution in China predicted under climate change scenario. Sci Silvae Sin. 2015; 51: 119–126. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ju YW, Li MY, Wu WH. Predictive methods of pine wilt disease in Jiangsu Province. Sci Silvae Sin. 2010; 46: 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ikegami M and Jenkins T.Estimate global risks of a forest disease under current and future climates using species distribution model and simple thermal model–pine wilt disease as a model case. Remote sens environ. 2018; 409: 343–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang YS, Xie BY, Wan FH, Xiao QM, Dai LY. Application of ROC Curve Analysis in Evaluating the Performance of Alien Species’ Potential Distribution Models. Biodiversity Science. 2007; 15(4): 356–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu Z, Peng H, Feng Z, Abdulsalih N. Predicting current and future invasion of Solidago canadensis: a study from China. Pol J Ecol. 2014; 62: 263–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang CJ, Wan JZ, Zhang ZX. Will global climate change facilitate plant invasions in conservation areas? Pak J Bot. 2019; 51(4): 1395–1403. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Puth LM, Post DM.Studying invasion: have we missed the boat? Ecol Lett. 2010; 8: 715–721. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li HQ, Xing LG, Liu XL, Pu YL, Yang YQ, Fu YY. Potential Impact of Climate Change on the Distribution of the Pinewood Nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Chongqing, China. Pak J Zool. 2022a: 54: 809–816. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Phillips SJ,Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum Entropy Modelling of Species Geographic Distributions. Ecol Eng. 2006: 190: 231–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Qin A, Liu B, Guo Q, Bussmann RW, Pei S. Maxent modeling for predicting impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of Thuja sutchuenensis Franch. an extremely endangered conifer from southwestern China. Glob Conserv Ecol. 2017; 10: 139–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wei ST, Li T, Lin YC. Prediction of the Potential Distribution of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Sichuan Province Using MaxEnt Model. Sichuan J Zool. 2019; 38(1): 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhuang HF, Zhang YB, Wang W, Ren YH, Liu FZ, Du JH et al. Optimized hot spot analysis for probability of species distribution under different spatial scales based on Maxent model: manglietia insignis case. Biodiversity Science. 2018; 26 (9): 931–940. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ruan O, Liu SH, Chen F, Luo J, Hu HT. Habitat suitability evaluation of black-necked cranes based on multi-source remote sensing in Caohai National Nature Reserve, Guizhou. Acta Ecol Sin. 2022; 42(5): 1947–1957. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li HQ, Xing LG, Sun XP. Predicting the potential distribution of Taxus wallichiana var. mairei under climate change in China using Maxent modeling. Pak J Bot. 2022b; 54(4): 1305–1310. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu C, White M, Newell G. Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. J Biogeogr. 2013; 40(4): 778–789. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xia SS, Hu DM, Deng Y, Zhong X, Zhou CQ. Habitat partitioning between sympatric golden pheasant and temminck’s tragopan at different spatial scales. Acta Ecol Sin. 2019; 39(5): 1627–1638. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jaryan V, Datta A, Uniyal SK, Kumar A, Gupta RC, Singh RD. Modelling potential distribution of Sapium sebiferum-an invasive tree species in western Himalaya. Currt Sci. 2013; 105: 1282–1288. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jia X, Ma FF, Zhou WM, Zhou L, Yu DB, Qin J. Impacts of climate change on the potential geographical distribution of broadleaved Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) forests. Acta Ecol Sin. 2017; 37: 464–473. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bethanya B, Davids W, Michael O. Climate change increases risk of plant invasion in the Eastern United States. Biol Invasions. 2010; 12(6): 1855–1872. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bellard C, Thuiller W, Leroy B, Genovesi P, Bakkenes M, Courchamp F. Will climate change promote future invasions? Global Change Biol. 2013; 19: 3740–3748. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vorsino AE, Fortini LB, Amidon FA, Miller SE, Koob GA. Modeling hawaiian ecosystem degradation due to invasive plants under current and future climates. PloS One. 2014; 9: e102400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2005; 25:1965–1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang N, Ma DY, Zhong X, Yang K, Zhou ZQ, Zhou HL et al. Habitat Suitability Assessment of Blue Eared-Pheasant Based on MaxEnt Modeling in Wanglang National Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province. Acta Ecol Sin. 2020; 40(19): 7064–7072. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang RL, Li Q, Feng CH, Shi CP. Predicting potential ecological distribution of Locusta migratoria tibetensis in China using MaxEnt ecological niche modeling. Acta Ecol Sin. 2017; 37(24): 8556–8566. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hijmans RJ,Graham CH. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biol. 2010; 12(12): 2272–2281. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Karspeck A, Yeager S, Danabasoglu G, Teng H. An evaluation of experimental decadal predictions using CCSM4. Clim Dynam. 2015; 44: 907–923. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bosso L, Luchi N, Maresi G, Cristinzio G, Smeraldo S, Russo D. Predicting current and future disease outbreaks of Diplodia sapinea shoot blight in Italy: species distribution models as a tool for forest management planning. Forest Ecol Manag. 2017; 400: 655–664. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Khanum R, Mumtaz AS, Kumar S. Predicting impacts of climate change on medicinal asclepiads of pakistan using maxent modeling. Acta Oecol. 2013; 49: 23–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang XY, Huang XL, Jiang LY, Qiao GX.Predicting potential distribution of chestnut phylloxerid (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) based on Garp and Maxent ecological niche models. J Appl Entomol. 2010; 134: 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kumar S, Graham J, West AM, Evangelista PH. Using district-level occurrences in Maxent for predicting the invasion potential of an exotic insect pest in india. Comput Electron Agr. 2014, 103: 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang H, Zhao HX, Wang H. Potential geographical distribution of Populus euphratica in China under future climate change scenarios based on Maxent model. Acta Ecol Sin. 2020; 40(18): 6552–6563. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang AJ, Lu DY, Zhang GS, Huang HG, Wang Y, Hu SL, et al. Potential Distribution of Juniperus sabina under Climate Change in Eurasia Continent Based on MaxEnt Model. Sci Silvae Sin. 2021; 57(8): 43–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hu XG, Jin Y, Wang XR, Mao JF, Li Y. Predicting impacts of future climate change on the distribution of the widespread conifer Platycladus orientalis. Plos One. 2015; 10: e0132326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dong X, Chu YMR, Gu XD, Huang QY, Zhang JD, Bai WK. Suitable habitat prediction of sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) and its implications for conservation in baihe nature reserve, Sichuan, China. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2019; 26(31): 32374–32384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen J, Cheng J, Lin T.Analysis of potential molecular targets in Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) inoculated with Beauveria bassiana (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). J Entomol Sci. 2018; 53(4): 533–542. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rehfeldt GE, Ying CC, Spittlehouse DL, Hamilton DA. Genetic responses to climate in pinus contorta: niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecol Monogr. 1999; 69(3): 375–407. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Robinet C, Roques A, Pan HY, Fang GF, Ye JR, Zhang YZ et al. Role of human-mediated dispersal in the spread of the pinewood nematode in China. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e4646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang Q. The Biogeography of Monochamus Guer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Sci Silvae Sin. 1988; 24(3): 297–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ma RY, Hao SG, Kong WN, Sun JH, Kang L. Cold hardiness as a factor for assessing the po tential distribution of the japanese pine sawyer Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in China. Ann Forest Sci. 2006; 63(5): 449–456. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dai LX, Liu YJ, Zhang Q. Influence of ice and snow disasters on the population of Monochamus alternatus and its counter-measures. Forest Pest and Disease. 2010; 29: 32–34. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mohammed Magdy Hamed

24 Jul 2023

PONE-D-23-10310Dynamic Changes of Suitable Areas for the Pinewood Nematode in Sichuan-Chongqing Region of ChinaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. li,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 07 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohammed Magdy Hamed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

"The work was financially subsidized by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31870515; Excellent Achievement Transformation Project in Universities of Chongqing, grant number KJZH17132."

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."" 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

5. We note that Figures 1 and 3 in your submission contain map/satellite images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1 and 3 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""Other"" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors of “Dynamic Changes of Suitable Areas for the Pinewood Nematode

in Sichuan-Chongqing Region of China” aimed to predict the future spread of the economically important biological hazard B. xylophilus (pinewood nematode) in the Sichuan-Chongqing Region of China. Using species distribution data (collected by themselves and from other sources), current environmental data and predicted future environmental data the authors simulated current and future distributions of B. xylophilus in the region using the freely available MaxEnt model.

The work is of scientific and economic interest as not only is B. xylophilus a major forestry pest, but as there is currently a lack of effective treatments predicting potential B. xylophilus invasions and allowing preventative measures to be put in place is currently the most effective way of preventing large scale outbreaks and ecological damage.

The major conclusions of the paper were that:

1) The paper provides an improvement of previous work by the same authors due to several factors. These include a larger area of study and the use of multiple GCMs.

2) The improved model predicted current regions and new regions which should be monitored for B. xylophilus invasion.

Major comments:

Unfortunately, the paper is very hard to read and requires significant rewriting and restructuring before publication.

For example, at first it was hard to visualise how this work differed from a recent paper from the same first author and published in the Pakistan Journal of Zoology in 2022 (“Potential Impact of Climate Change on the Distribution of the Pinewood Nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in Chongqing, China” Hongqun https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20190912070900).

I think the authors did try to address the novelty of this work and how this study aims to be an improvement on the previous research (lines 109-127) but I think this still needs to be much clearer. It must be clearly stated what the differences are and how the improvements have helped define a better model. For example, point (2) (lines 111-113) requires clarification.

This is also true in the discussion where the authors address if the results they have found are a better predictor than their own previous research (lines 324-327).

The discussion was very confusing and requires heavy editing to allow the major findings to be clearly stated and the potential outcome of these findings to be discussed. For example, the work of firming up areas that require monitoring and identifying new areas which the model predicts require monitoring are clear improvements on the previous model (lines 332-338) but it gets lost in the over complicated discussion. Would it be worth having figures that illustrated the differences between the previous work model and this model/s to show improvements? Currently I am unable to deduce if the statements in the work can be fully supported by the data provided.

Minor comments:

No Figure legends? This made it difficult for a non-expert to read the figures.

There are two Li et al., 2022 in the references- they need to be a and b to allow them to be told apart

Reviewer #2: The idea of the research is concerned with an important topic in the field of Modeling of the Pinewood Nematode (PWN), to simulate the current and future geographic distribution of PWN in the Sichuan-Chongqing region of China based on the MaxEnt model, In conclusion, I recommend publishing this research in your important and discreet journal due to its scientific importance, after making the required modifications. The review is attached.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Prof. Dr. Nabil ABO KAF

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

<quillbot-extension-portal></quillbot-extension-portal>

Attachment

Submitted filename: Research evaluation.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: revised_19bbc.doc

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 19;18(10):e0292893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292893.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


15 Sep 2023

Responds to Academic Editor:

1.My manuscript format has been reedited according to PLOS ONE's style requirements.

2.I have provided the correct grant numbers for the awards I received for our study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3.I added: The funders played no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

4.I added: Data Availability Statement: The data of all 20 environmental variables were freely downloaded from global climate data (http://www.worldclim.org). Some data regarding the points at which this species existed were acquired from the Sichuan Forestry and Grassland Bureau in 2019 (http://lcj.sc.gov.cn/scslyt/gsgg/2019) and provided by the Chongqing Forest Disease and Pest Control Station of China.

5.Additionally, a China vector map was acquired from the free spatial data of diva-gis (http://swww.diva-gis.org/Data). Please see it below:

Responds to Reviewers' comments:

1. I think that the data support the conclusions, because the Maxent model comes from the maximum entropy principle, and performs better than other SDMs. Of them, the Maxent model has been widely used for the protection of endangered species, priority evaluation of reserve design, diffusion of alien invasive species, and so on. Most importantly, we use multiple methods to avoid many sources of error and improve prediction accuracy.

2.We conducted lots of analysis of high multicollinearitya, predictor contributions, permutation importance, and regularized training gain, and so on.

3.we invited the company to polish the language and express our gratitude “We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.”

Regarding major comments:

1.I have replied this question, please see the above-section 3 “We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing”

2.See it in lines 82-95. These above-mentioned related studies are relatively incomplete, which are mainly reflected in: (1) the relatively small areas studied, because the MaxEnt model can only achieve higher accuracy on a large scale and has a large error on a small scale, which could be because a higher spatial scale means that more species information can be obtained; (2) the lack of accurate location analysis of increases and decreases in distribution, resulting in difficulty in laying out the scientific investigations and control pest infestations; (3) a lack of innovation in research methods, compared with our new method that uses the newly introduced maximum Youden index and the average habitat suitability based on 10 replicates by cross-validation; (4) only one specific global climate model (GCM) is used, making it difficult to explain related uncertainties owing to a lack of experimental verification of prediction results from multiple GCMs; and (5) a lack of multicollinearity analysis among environmental variables,etc. which is regarded as an error source. For these questions, we have all made improvements.

3.In conclusion, we have already emphasized the major findings, such as “Most importantly, in addition to the actual distribution area, four suitable distribution areas, A, B, C, and D, were newly discovered and should be strictly monitored for the presence of PWNs in the coming years. Up to the 2050s, the suitable distribution areas of the PWN showed an increasing trend. Four newly discovered future suitable distribution areas, E, F, G, and H, were identified. “

Regarding minor comments:

1.Figure captions should be inserted in the text following the paragraph of the figure’s first mention, while figures themselves should be submitted separately. See it in the text.

2.In list of the references, I have used a and b to allow them to be told apart, such as Li et al., 2022a and Li et al., 2022b.

Decision Letter 1

Mohammed Magdy Hamed

2 Oct 2023

Dynamic Changes of Suitable Areas for the Pinewood Nematode in Sichuan-Chongqing Region of China

PONE-D-23-10310R1

Dear Dr. li,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mohammed Magdy Hamed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I am happy to accept the manuscript (although I include very minor revision notes below). Please note I am referring to the manuscript I was sent directly by the editor and not the version I could download either via the portal or the link in the e-mail.

The manuscript was much improved with regards to clarity and my concerns were addressed. I feel the rewording allowed the novelty and main findings of the work to be expressed more clearly.

On the manuscript I was sent with changes tracked I spotted 3 very minor errors.

On Line 944 The authors (as in the editor notes) need to clarify what A,B etc are

On Line 1283 The authors refer to the PWN as B. xylophilus for the first time. This should be the full latin name and in the introduction not the discussion.

In the discussion the numbering has broken down as (1) is deleted. Therefore (2) on line 164 needs editing (or removing).

Reviewer #2: The work is good, the authors have taken all the notes into consideration, and the research has become publishable in PLOS ONE.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Prof. Dr. Nabil Abo Kaf

**********

Attachment

Submitted filename: Plos-one-comments-resubmission.docx

Acceptance letter

Mohammed Magdy Hamed

11 Oct 2023

PONE-D-23-10310R1

Dynamic Changes in the Suitable Areas for the Pinewood Nematode in the Sichuan–Chongqing Region of China

Dear Dr. Li:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Mr. Mohammed Magdy Hamed

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Research evaluation.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: revised_19bbc.doc

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Plos-one-comments-resubmission.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Data Availability Statement: The data of all 20 environmental variables were freely downloaded from global climate data (http://www.worldclim.org). Some data regarding the points at which this species existed were acquired from the Sichuan Forestry and Grassland Bureau in 2019 (http://lcj.sc.gov.cn/scslyt/gsgg/2019) and provided by the Chongqing Forest Disease and Pest Control Station of China.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES