In the published review, there was an error in the classification of oat. Due to the differences in inflorescence between oat and tribe Triticeae, oat cannot be included in tribe Triticeae. Given their strict classification, we have removed the description of oat section in our review to make the content of this review more rigorous.
A correction has been made to Abstract, paragraph one, page 1.
The sentence previously stated:
“Major crops within the Triticeae are wheat, barley, rye, and oat, which are important for human consumption, animal feed, and rangeland protection.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Major crops within the Triticeae are wheat, barley and rye which are important for human consumption, animal feed, and rangeland protection.”
A correction has been made to the Keywords, page 1.
The keywords previously stated:
“Triticeae, wheat, barley, rye, oat, genome sequencing, pan-genome”
The corrected keywords appear below:
“Triticeae, wheat, barley, rye, genome sequencing, pan-genome”
A correction has been made to Introduction, Relationship between Triticeae crop, paragraph one, page 2.
The sentence previously stated:
“Triticeae comprises several major crop species such as barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), rye (Secale cereale L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), and wheat, including bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ssp. aestivum) and durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum).”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Triticeae comprises several major crop species such as barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), rye (Secale cereale L.) and wheat, including bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ssp. aestivum) and durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. ssp. durum).”
A correction has been made to Triticeae crop genome biology section, The oat genome made a significant breakthrough in 2022, page 6.
The section has been removed.
A correction has been made to Table 1 , pages 3 – 4.
Table 1.
Presently available reference genomes for Triticeae crops.
| Crop/species | Ploidy | Genome size | Contig N50 | Scaffold N50 | Year | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barley (Morex) (HH) | Diploid | 4.98 Gb | 904.00 kb | 2012 | (Consortium TIBGS, 2012) | |
| Tibetan barley (HH) | Diploid | 3.89 Gb | 18.07 kb | 242.00 kb | 2015 | (Zeng et al., 2015) |
| Barley (Morex) (HH) | Diploid | 4.79 Gb | 79.00 kb | 1.90 Mb | 2017 | (Mascher et al., 2017) |
| Tibetan barley (HH) | Diploid | 4.84 Gb | 5.94 kb | 173.83 kb | 2018 | (Dai et al., 2018) |
| Wild barley (HH) | Diploid | 4.28 Gb | 35.4 kb | 724.93 kb | 2020 | (Liu et al., 2019) |
| Barley (Golden Promise) (HH) | Diploid | 4.13 Gb | 22.4 kb | 4.14 Mb | 2020 | (Schreiber et al., 2020) |
| Barley (Morex V2) (HH) | Diploid | 4.65 Gb | 40.20 Mb | 2019 | (Monat et al., 2019) | |
| Barley (Morex) (HH) (5 accessions) |
Diploid | 4.14 Gb- 4.48 Gb |
69.6 Mb- 87.6 Mb |
14.20Mb-118.90 Mb | 2021 | (Mascher et al., 2021) |
| Barley pan-genome (HH) (20 accessions) |
Diploid | 3.80 Gb- 4.50 Gb |
5.00 Mb- 42.70 Mb |
2020 | (Jayakodi et al., 2020) | |
| T. urartu (AA) | Diploid | 4.66 Gb | 63.69 kb | 2013 | (Ling et al., 2013) | |
| T. urartu (AA) | Diploid | 4.86 Gb | 344 kb | 3.67 Mb | 2018 | (Ling et al., 2018) |
| Ae. tauschii (DD) | Diploid | 4.36 Gb | 4.52 kb | 57.60 kb | 2013 | (Jia et al., 2013) |
| Ae. tauschii (DD) | Diploid | 4.22 Gb | 31.73 Mb | 2017 | (Luo et al., 2017) | |
| Ae. tauschii (DD) | Diploid | 4.34 Gb | 486.80 kb | 521.70 kb | 2017 | (Zimin et al., 2017b) |
| Ae. tauschii (DD) | Diploid | 4.50 Gb | 112.60 kb | 12.10 Mb | 2017 | (Zhao et al., 2017) |
|
Ae. tauschii (DD) pan–genome (DD) (4 accessions) |
Diploid | 4.12 Gb- 4.22 Gb |
1.90 Mb-2.20 Mb | 48.70 Mb-76.60 Mb | 2021 | (Zhou et al., 2021) |
| Wild emmer (BBAA) | Tetraploid | 10.10 Gb | 57.38 kb | 6.96 Mb | 2017 | (Avni et al., 2017) |
| Wild emmer (BBAA) | Tetraploid | 10.37 Gb | 72.63 Mb | 2019 | (Zhu et al., 2019) | |
| Wild emmer (Zavitan) (BBAA) | Tetraploid | 11.10 Gb | 1.30 Mb | 2019 | (Monat et al., 2019) | |
| Durum wheat (BBAA) | Tetraploid | 10.45 Gb | 6.00 Mb | 2019 | (Maccaferri et al., 2019) | |
| Bread wheat (Chr 3B) | Hexaploid | 995.0 Mb | 2008 | (Yu et al., 2008) | ||
| Bread wheat (BBAADD) | Hexaploid | 10.20 Gb | 2014 | (International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium, 2014) | ||
| Bread wheat (BBAADD) | Hexaploid | 9.10 Gb | 24.80 kb | 2015 | (Chapman et al., 2015) | |
| Bread wheat (BBAADD) | Hexaploid | 13.43 Gb | 88.80 kb | 2017 | (Clavijo et al., 2017) | |
| Bread wheat (BBAADD) | Hexaploid | 15.35 Gb | 232.66 kb | 2017 | (Zimin et al., 2017a) | |
| Bread wheat (BBAADD) | Hexaploid | 14.50 Gb | 51.80 kb | 7.00 Mb | 2018 | (Appels et al., 2018) |
| Tibetan wheat (BBAADD) | Hexaploid | 14.71 Gb | 66.26 kb | 37.62 Mb | 2020 | (Guo et al., 2020) |
| Bread wheat (BBAADD) | Hexaploid | 15.70 Gb | 2.30 Mb | 2019 | (Monat et al., 2019) | |
| Bread wheat pan-genome (BBAADD) (15 accessions) | Hexaploid | 14.10 Gb- 14.90 Gb |
16.40 kb- 83.47 kb |
68.50 kb- 49.70 Mb | 2020 | (Walkowiak et al., 2020) |
| Bread wheat pan-genome (BBAADD) (4 accessions) | Hexaploid | 14.53 Gb-14.71 Gb | 6.87 Mb-72.09 Mb | 2021 | (Zhu et al., 2021) | |
| Bread wheat (BBAADD) Fielder | Hexaploid | 14.70 Gb | 21.00 Mb | 2021 | (Sato et al., 2021) | |
| Bread wheat (BBAADD) kenong9204 | Hexaploid | 14.77Gb | 366 kb | 21.87 Mb | 2022 | (Shi et al., 2022) |
| Bread wheat (BBAADD) AK58 | Hexaploid | 14.75Gb | 2021 | (Jizeng Jia et al., 2021) | ||
| Rye (RR) | Diploid | 2.80 Gb | 1.71 kb | 9.45 kb | 2016 | (Bauer et al., 2017) |
| Rye (RR) Weining | Diploid | 7.74 Gb | 480.35 kb | 1.04 Gb | 2021 | (Li et al., 2021) |
| Rye (RR) Lo7 | Diploid | 6.74 Gb | 29.40 Mb | 2021 | (Rabanus-Wallace et al., 2021) | |
| Thinopyrum elongatum (EE) | Diploid | 4.63 Gb | 2.15 Mb | 73.24 Mb | 2020 | (Wang et al., 2020a) |
The corrected Table 1 is below:
A correction has been made to Figure 1 , page 3.
Figure 1.
Statistics of the published Triticeae crop genomes. The contig N50 (the sequence length of the shortest contig at 50% of the total assembly size) is plotted by the year of publication. The size of each dot is the numerical value of N50. The sequencing platforms are color-coded. The sequencing technologies and the size of N50 have driven a large improvement over the years.
The corrected Figure 1 is below:
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.