In the published article, there was an error in Figures 1, 3. These figures were published in the wrong order. That is, Figure 1, correctly captioned, showed the image of Figure 3 and vice versa. The corrected Figures 1, 3 appear below.
Figure 1.
Growth in number of peer-reviewed publications in hope theory by year (1991–2021).
Figure 3.
Analysis of the type of research method (quantitative, mixed-methods, qualitative) utilized by year.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.