Abstract
Nitroorganics present a general concern for a safe environment due to their health hazards. However, some nitroorganics such as metronidazole (Mtz) and chloramphenicol (CAM) also possess medicinal value. Mtz and CAM can undergo reductive bioactivation presumably via their nitroso derivatives. We show, using UV-vis spectroscopy, that sperm whale myoglobin (swMb) and its distal pocket mutants retaining H-bonding capacity react with Mtz in the presence of dithionite to generate products with spectra suggestive of the Fe-bound nitroso (Fe–RNO; λmax ~420 nm) forms. We have crystallized and solved the X-ray crystal structure of an H64Q swMb-acetamide compound to 1.76 Å resolution; formation of this compound results from the serendipitous crystallographic trapping, by the heme center, of acetamide from the reductive decomposition of Mtz. Only one of the swMb proteins, namely H64Q swMb with a relatively flexible Gln64 residue, reacted with CAM presumably due to the bulky nature of CAM that generally may restrict its access to the heme site.
Keywords: Heme, myoglobin, metronidazole, chloramphenicol, X-ray structure, nitroso, acetamide
Graphical Abstract

The heme protein myoglobin (Mb) and its distal pocket mutants H64Q and V68A/I107Y react with the antibiotic metronidazole (Mtz) under reducing conditions to form products assigned as the nitroso (Fe–RNO; λmax ~420 nm) derivatives. Attempted crystallization of the H64Q product resulted in the first structural determination of a heme protein-acetamide complex.
INTRODUCTION
Nitrooorganics including nitroaromatics pose significant threats to a healthy environment, as several members of this class are toxic, carcinogenic, and/or mutagenic [1–3]. Metalloporphyrins aid in the metabolism of some nitro-containing drugs and organics under reducing conditions (reviewed in [4,5]). The reactions generally involve conversion of the nitroorganic functionalities under reducing conditions to the nitroso forms (eq 1) that may bind directly to the heme sites (products with λmax ~420 nm) as shown by us and others [6–10].
![]() |
(1) |
Metronidazole (Mtz) and chloramphenicol (CAM) are two widely prescribed drugs used for the treatment of bacterial infections. Sketches of their chemical structures are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Chemical structures of metronidazole (Mtz) and chloramphenicol (CAM).
Mtz is used in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infections in the gut and the oral cavity, and is typically metabolized by the bacterial nitroreductase enzymes [11–13]. CAM is a much larger molecule that also contains a nitroorganic functionality, and is now only rarely used when other antibiotic treatments for serious infections are not effective [14]. The nitroso derivative of CAM is presumed to be one of the bioactive intermediates under reducing conditions, although its role in toxicity remains unclear [15,16].
We are interested in determining if the nitroso derivatives of Mtz and CAM are capable of binding to the Fe center of heme proteins. We thus pursued their reactions with the prototypical protein myoglobin, in particular the wild-type sperm whale Mb protein and selected distal pocket mutants that vary in H-bonding capacity to bound ligands. In this paper, we report our UV-vis spectral findings for these reactions, and also report the X-ray crystal structure of an unexpected, but important first member of the heme protein-acetamide family.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The wild type and mutant sperm whale Mbs were obtained as previously described [17–19]. Metronidazole (Mtz; Fluka) and chloramphenicol (CAM; Sigma) were purchased from commercial suppliers and used as received.
UV-vis spectroscopy
UV-vis spectroscopy was used to monitor the reactions of ferric swMbIII–H2O (wt and mutants) with Mtz and CAM. An initial reading was taken of the starting ferric MbIII–H2O (5 μL of 20 mg/mL) in 2.5 mL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.4. Sodium dithionite (5 μL of a 1 M solution) was added to the cuvette to fully reduce the protein to ferrous deoxyMbII, and a reading was taken. An aliquot of the substrate (10–15 μL; 50 mg/mL CAM or 20 mM Mtz) was then added to the cuvette. Readings were taken at different time points during the course of the reaction to monitor its progress.
Crystallization
The co-crystallization method was utilized to obtain crystals from the reaction of H64Q swMb with Mtz. Ferric H64Q swMbIII–H2O (75 μL of a 20 mg/mL in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.4) was mixed with a few grains of solid Mtz and allowed to react for 15 min. A small of amount of solid sodium dithionite was then added to the mixture. Completion of the reaction was confirmed using UV-vis spectroscopy. Crystals were grown using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method as described by Phillips et al [20]. The wells contained 2.60 M ammonium sulfate, 100 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4, and the drops contained a 1:1 ratio of protein-reaction to well solution. The drops were seeded with crushed ferric H64A swMbIII–H2O crystals after an equilibration period of 6 h. Crystals started forming after ~3 days, and suitably-sized crystals were harvested after 17 days using cryoloops and were frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to data collection.
X-ray data collection
The diffraction data were collected at the University of Oklahoma Macromolecular Crystallography Lab (OU MCL) using a home source Rigaku MicroMax 007HF microfocus X-ray generator coupled to a PILATUS 200K detector. The data was collected at 100 K with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å) from the generator operated at 40 kV/30 mA.
Data processing, structure solution and refinement
The X-ray diffraction data were processed using HKL3000 and the resulting sca files were converted to mtz using Scalepack2mtz in the CCP4 program suite [21]. PHASER MR (CCP4) [22] was used to determine the initial phases. The model used for molecular replacement was wt swMb (ferric MbIII–H2O) at 1.5 Å resolution (PDB ID: 2MBW) with the heme, water molecules and ligands removed from the structure. Refinements were performed using Refmac5 (CCP4) [23] and phenix.refine [24]. Models were rebuilt using COOT [25] and validated using MolProbity [26] to check for unusual residue conformations and contacts.
The figures for each structure were generated using Pymol [27]. 2Fo–Fc electron density maps were calculated by Fast Fourier Transform (FFT; CCP4) [28]. Fo–Fc electron density maps were generated by first deleting all ligands from the final pdb file of each structure. This pdb file was used to create a new Fc mtz file using SFall (CCP4). The Fc mtz file was used to generate the Fo–Fc electron density map using FFT. The resulting FFT map files were converted to ccp4 files and displayed in Pymol.
Ten initial cycles of restrained refinement were run with Refmac5, and the R factor decreased from 0.361 to 0.276. Ligands and water were added to the model based on the Fo–Fc electron density maps in the subsequent refinement cycles. Two sulfate anions, two glycerol molecules and one acetamide (ligand id: ACM) were added to the model. The N-terminal Met and the C-terminal residues Q152 and G153 were omitted due to lack of electron density. Two conformations for the sidechains Val68 and Lys133 were modeled with 50% occupancy each. The final R factor and Rfree were 0.204 and 0.221, respectively. The structure has been deposited with the Protein Data Bank with access code 8FB0.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
UV-vis spectral monitoring
UV-vis spectral monitoring of the reactions of the Mb proteins with Mtz and CAM revealed that, in selected cases, products formed that were suggestive of the target ferrous nitroso MbII–RNO derivatives being generated. An initial spectral reading was taken of ferric wild-type or mutant swMbIII–H2O (λmax ~409 nm) as the starting point. Dithionite was added to reduce the protein to its ferrous deoxyMbII form (λmax ~433 nm) [29,30] and as a result, shifts in the Soret band from ~409 to ~433 nm. Similar spectra were observed for the mutant proteins (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

UV-vis spectral changes during the reactions of (A) wt Mb with Mtz, (B) V68A/I107Y Mb with Mtz, (C) H64Q Mb with Mtz, and (D) H64Q Mb with CAM. Conditions: 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, [protein] = 2.0 μM, [dithionite] = 2 mM, [Mtz] = 350 μM or [CAM] = 600 μM.
Mtz or CAM was then added to the cuvette containing the reduced protein. In the case of ferrous deoxyMbII in its reaction with Mtz, the peak in the Soret band shifted from λmax 434 nm for the reduced protein to 420 nm (Fig. 2A) and the reaction was complete after ~20 min. Similar shifts were seen in the Soret bands for both ferrous V68A/I107Y (432 to 422 nm) and H64Q MbII (434 to 421 nm) in their reactions with Mtz (Figs. 2B–C). Reaction of the H64Q Mb mutant with Mtz was complete after ~5 min, but the reaction with the V68A/I107Y Mb mutant took ~75 min to reach completion.
Interestingly, ferric H64Q MbIII–H2O was the only form of swMb that reacted with CAM, resulting in shifts in the Soret band from 434 to 419 nm (Fig. 2D); this reaction was complete after ~10 min. The data in Table 1 summarizes these UV-vis spectral observations. The spectra are not shown for the reactions of the other reduced Mb proteins with CAM that did not occur, as the spectra remained the same as those of the reduced deoxyMbII species.
Table 1.
Summary of the interaction of the reduced swMbs with Mtz and CAM showing times to completion.
| Ligand | wtMb | H64A | H64Q | H64V | V68A/I107Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mtz | 420 nm at 20 min | No rxn | 421 at 5 min | No rxn | 422 at 75 min |
| CAM | No rxn | No rxn | 419 nm at 10 min | No rxn | No rxn |
Analysis of the reactions of the reduced swMbs with Mtz and CAM
Our results summarized in Table 1 suggest that a distal pocket H-bonding residue is necessary for the product formation from the reaction of both CAM and Mtz with the reduced MbII centers, since neither CAM nor Mtz reacted with the H64A or H64V mutants that do not contain such distal pocket H-bonding residues. Mtz did react with ferric wt, H64Q and V68A/I107Y MbII proteins, suggesting that Mtz does not have a preference for a particular amino acid at position 64 but does require a H-bonding residue in this location.
Interestingly, although CAM reacted with the reduced H64Q Mb mutant to generate a product with λmax of 419 nm assigned to the nitroso derivative, we did not observe reactions with either the wt or V68A/I107Y Mb proteins although the latter also contain distal pocket H-bonding residues. These results suggest that CAM has a preference for Gln over His in position 64, probably due to the fact that CAM is a larger substrate than Mtz, and likely requires a more flexible amino acid like Gln in position 64 to allow CAM to enter the pocket.
Crystallography: X-ray crystal structure of H64Q swMb with acetamide
We pursued multiple crystallization efforts in attempts to obtain diffraction-quality crystals for the target ferrous MbII–RNO derivatives (i.e., the products with λmax ~420 nm in Fig. 2) but were not successful. However, one of our attempts led to the determination of a crystal structure of a heme-acetamide product that coincidentally has structural biology relevance in its own right.
Our attempt to crystallize the product from the reactions of ferric H64Q swMbIII–H2O with Mtz in the presence of dithionite as the reducing agent yielded suitable crystals of a product whose X-ray crystal structure was solved to 1.76 Å resolution; data collection and refinement statistics are collected in Table 2.
Table 2.
Data collection and refinement statistics
| Data collectiona | Refinement statistics | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Space group | P6 | No. of protein atoms | 1262 |
| Cell dimensions: a, b, c (Å); α, β, γ (°) | 90.29, 90.29, 45.26 90.00, 90.00, 120.00 |
R factorc | 0.150 |
| Resolution (Å) | 45.26–1.76 | R free d | 0.0.178 |
| I/σ[I] | 24.79 (9.06) | RMSD Bond length (Å) | 0.019 |
| No. of observed reflns | 22224 | RMSD Bond angles (°) | 1.99 |
| No. of unique reflns | 21041 (2046) | Overall Mean B Factor (Å3) | 14.43 |
| Multiplicity | 1.8 (1.4) | Ramachandran plot (%)e | |
| Completeness (%) | 99.8 (98.3) | most favored residues | 98.01 |
| R merge b | 0.024 (0.058) | outliers | 0.00 |
| CC1/2 | 0.999 |
Values in parentheses correspond to the highest resolution shells.
Rmerge = Σ|I–<I>|/Σ(I), where I is the individual intensity observation and <I> is the mean of all measurements of I.
R = Σ||Fo|–|Fc||/Σ|Fo|, where Fo and Fc are the observed and calculated structure factors, respectively.
Rfree was calculated by using 5% of the randomly selected diffraction data, which were excluded from the refinement.
As calculated using MolProbity.
The crystal structure of this Mb product, focusing on the heme active site, is shown in Fig. 3. Curiously, the new electron density in the Fo–Fc omit maps did not match that of an Mtz-bound species (Figs. 3B–C). Instead, the new electron density at the heme site best matched that of acetamide (CH3C(=O)NH2; ACM) which was modeled in its O-bound form as determined in non-protein models [31,32]. The Fe–O(ACM) distance is 2.2 Å and is close to the analogous distance of 2.091(1) Å determined in the six-coordinate bis-acetamide heme model [(TPP)Fe(O=C(NH2)CH3)2]ClO4 complex reported earlier [31]. The ACM ligand engages in a H-bond interaction with the distal pocket Gln64 residue with a heteroatom (ACM)O…H2N(Gln) bond distance of 2.6 Å.
Fig. 3.

X-ray crystal structure of ferrous H64Q swMb–ACM showing only the active site. (A) Final model of the active site showing the closest interactions of the ACM ligand with the Fe center and Gln64 residue. (B) The Fo–Fc omit map (contoured at 1.5 σ) showing the presence of electron-density assigned to ACM. (C) The corresponding 2Fo–Fc map (contoured at 1.0 σ).
Importantly, acetamides are known to interact with heme proteins. For example, allyl isopropyl acetamide depletes cytoplasmic heme via degradation of the cytochrome P450 heme [33,34]. It is thus surprising that not much is currently known about the structural consequences of acetamide binding to heme. It is also interesting to note that a dichloroacetamide product arises from the Fe-mediated decomposition of chloramphenicol (CAM)[35]. To the best of our knowledge, our Mb-acetamide structure described above in Fig. 3 is the first reported X-ray crystal structure of a heme protein with a bound acetamide ligand.
Likely origin of the acetamide fragment in the X-ray crystal structure
Based on the UV-vis studies above (Fig. 2C) describing the reaction of ferric H64Q MbIII–H2O with Mtz in the presence of the reducing agent dithionite, we expected to find Mtz bound to the Fe center in the crystal structure. However, we found that it was acetamide (ACM) that was bound instead. Notably, the reaction between the Mb protein and Mtz was carried out in the presence of dithionite that does not seem to affect the integrity of the targeted Mb-RNO product over short time periods.
It is known that sodium dithionite by itself can reductively activate Mtz, eventually leading to ring fission generating hydroxyethyl oxamic acid and ACM (Fig. 4) [11].
Fig. 4.

Reductive activation of Mtz via the nitroso and hydroxylamino derivatives en route to acetamide (ACM) formation (adapted from ref [11]).
It is thus likely that, during the extended time period the complex remained in the crystallization well prior to crystal harvesting (~3 weeks) a portion of the Mtz reagent was cleaved by dithionite to generate ACM, and the crystals obtained were those from the contributing [Mb+ACM] reaction.
CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated that the antibiotic Mtz reacts with wild-type and mutant (H64Q and V68A/I107Y) myoglobin under reducing conditions to generate compounds with spectra suggestive of nitroso (Fe–RNO; λmax ~420 nm) formation in solution as determined by UV-vis spectroscopy. The lack of observed reactivity with the H64A and H64V mutants suggests that the presence of a distal-pocket H-bonding residue is required for the success of the reaction under our experimental conditions. Similar reactivity with CAM was only observed for the H64Q mutant protein that contains a relatively flexible Gln residue at position 64, consistent with the relatively larger size of CAM versus Mtz for entry into the distal pocket. Our attempts to crystallize one such product resulted in our X-ray structural determination of the first heme protein-acetamide complex, namely that of H64Q swMb-acetamide. Our results thus provide the first X-ray structural confirmation that acetamide can indeed serve as a ligand that binds directly to the Fe center in heme proteins. Given that acetamide is a common chemical in use in the solvent and plastics industries, we now have an opportunity to utilize this Mb-acetamide structure as a framework for further studies in this area of heme-acetamide interactions.
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by (while GBR-A was serving at) the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF; CHE-2154603 and CHE-1900181). Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. This paper reports data obtained in the University of Oklahoma Macromolecular Crystallography Laboratory which is supported, in part, by an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20GM103640, and by a Major Research Instrumentation award from the National Science Foundation under award number 092269.
REFERENCES
- 1.Roldan M, Perez-Reinado E, Castillo F and Moreno-Vivian C. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 2008; 32: 474–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.O’Brien PJ, Wong WC, Silva J and Khan S. Xenobiotica 1990; 20: 945–955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kovacic P and Somanathan R. J. Appl. Toxicol 2014; 34: 810–824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lee J, Chen L, West AH and Richter-Addo GB. Chem. Rev 2002; 102: 1019–1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xu N and Richter-Addo GB. Prog. Inorg. Chem 2014; 59: 381–445. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mansuy D, Gans P, Chottard J-C and Bartoli J-F. Eur. J. Biochem 1977; 76: 607–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mansuy D, Chottard JC and Chottard G. Eur. J. Biochem 1977; 76: 617–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mansuy D, Beaune P, Cresteil T, Bacot C, Chottard J-C and Gans P. Eur. J. Biochem 1978; 86: 573–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Copeland DM, West AH and Richter-Addo GB. Proteins: Struct., Func., Genet 2003; 53: 182–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yi J, Ye G, Thomas LM and Richter-Addo GB. Chem. Commun 2013; 49: 11179–11181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dingsong SA and Hunter N. J. Antimicrob. Chemother 2018; 73: 265–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McFarland LV. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2016; 25: 541–555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leffler DA and Lamont JT. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 1899–1912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yunis AA. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol 1988; 28: 83–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Eyer P, Lierheimer E and Schneller M. Biochem. Pharmacol 1984; 33: 2299–2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abou-Khalil S, Abou-Khalil WH and Yunis AA. Biochem. Pharmacol 1980; 29: 2605–2609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Springer BA and Sligar SG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987; 84: 8961–8965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang B, Shi YL, Tejero J, Powell SM, Thomas LM, Gladwin MT, Shiva S, Zhang Y and Richter-Addo GB. Biochemistry 2018; 57: 4788–4802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wang B, Thomas LM and Richter-Addo GB. J. Inorg. Biochem 2016; 164: 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Phillips GN, Arduini RM, Springer BA and Sligar SG. Proteins: Struc., Func., Genet 1990; 7: 358–365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, Evans PR, Keegan RM, Krissinel EB, Leslie AGW, McCoy A, McNicholas SJ, Murshudov GN, Pannu NS, Potterton EA, Powell HR, Read RJ, Vagin A and Wilson KS. Acta Cryst. 2011; D67: 235–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC and Read RJ. J. Appl. Cryst 2007; 40: 658–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Murshudov GN, Vagin AA and Dodson EJ. Acta Cryst. 1997; D53: 240–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Afonine PV, Grosse-Kunstieve RW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Moriaty NW, Mustyakimov M, Terwilliger TC, Urzhumstev A, Zwart PH and Adams PD. Acta Cryst. Section D 2012; D68: 352–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Emsley P and Cowtan K. Acta Cryst. 2004; D60: 2126–2132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen VB, Arendall WB, Headd JJ, Keedy DA, Immormino RM, Kapral GJ, Murray LW, Richardson JS and Richardson DC. Acta Cryst. 2010; D66: 12–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.PYMOL 2022. Schrödinger-LLC; www.pymol.org. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Read RJ and Schierbeek AJ. J. Appl. Cryst 1988; 21: 490–495. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cox RP and Hollaway MR. Eur. J. Biochem 1977; 74: 575–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yi J, Heinecke J, Tan H, Ford PC and Richter-Addo GB. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009; 131: 18119–18128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu N, Guan Y, Nguyen N, Lingafelt C, Powell DR and Richter-Addo GB. J. Inorg. Biochem 2019; 194: 160–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xu N, Bevak AW, Armstrong BR and Powell DR. Polyhedron 2017; 127: 432–437. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fagard R and Guguenguillouzo C. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 1983; 114: 612–619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Matteis FD. Biochem. J 1971; 124: 767–777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chu WH, Ding SK, Bond T, Gao NY, Yin DQ, Xu B and Cao ZQ. Water Res. 2016; 104: 254–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

