Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2023 Mar 23;12:329. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.132186.1

Extracellular vesicles as novel drug delivery systems to target cancer and other diseases: Recent advancements and future perspectives

Divya Ramesh 1, Shankar Bakkannavar 1,a, Vinutha R Bhat 2, Krishna Sharan 3
PMCID: PMC10589634  PMID: 37868300

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-bound vesicles produced into the extracellular space by cells. Apoptotic bodies (ApoBD), microvesicles (MVs), and exosomes are examples of EVs, which act as essential regulators in cell-cell communication in both normal and diseased conditions. Natural cargo molecules such as miRNA, messenger RNA, and proteins are carried by EVs and transferred to nearby cells or distant cells through the process of circulation. Different signalling cascades are then influenced by these functionally active molecules. The information to be delivered to the target cells depends on the substances within the EVs that also includes synthesis method. EVs have attracted interest as potential delivery vehicles for therapies due to their features such as improved circulation stability, biocompatibility, reduced immunogenicity, and toxicity. Therefore, EVs are being regarded as potent carriers of therapeutics that can be used as a therapeutic agent for diseases like cancer. This review focuses on the exosome-mediated drug delivery to cancer cells and the advantages and challenges of using exosomes as a carrier molecule.

Keywords: EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES, ; Exosomes; Signalling cascade; Biocompatibility; Biogenesis;Cancer

Introduction

In multicellular organisms, interaction among the cells is required to sustain cellular activities and tissue homeostasis. Direct contact between the cells, are used to facilitate intercellular communication. 1 According to Wolf et al., 1967, microvesicles, formerly known as “platelet dust,” were initially recognised as a subcellular substance derived from thrombocytes that was present in both blood serum and plasma. These extracellular vesicles (EVs) possess importance in communication between the cells. These functions are done by transporting membrane and cytosolic proteins, lipids, and RNA between cells. 1 Exosomes are a type of extracellular vesicles with a diameter of 40–150 nm that are produced by all cells and exchanged between them. 2 Other vesicles engaged in intercellular communication include MVs, ectosomes, shedding vesicles, and microparticles. 3 5 Exosomes are produced from various cells when multivesicular bodies merge with the plasma membrane. 6 , 7 Natural sources of exosomes are saliva, blood, semen, urine, plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, and breast milk. 8 , 9 Exosomes are typically distinguished by their size, as well as the expression of exosome marker proteins, such as CD63, CD81, and CD9, etc. 10 12 EVs have been studied for their capacity to deliver drug to treat conditions like cancer and other diseases such as liver ailments, 13 nerve disorders, 14 sepsis treatment, 15 and wound healing. 16

Classification and composition of extracellular vesicles

There are three types of EVs, namely Exosomes, microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies. These are differentiated and classified according to size and method of biogenesis 17 , 18 21 as depicted in Figure 1. Exosomes are endocytic in origin formed by plasma membrane budding and blebbing. 22 The density, content, and function of EVs are further distinguished. 22 , 23 The details of various vesicle subtypes are as shown in Table 1.

Figure 1. Diagram illustrating the classification of extracellular vesicles.

Figure 1.

Table 1. Table depicting various subtypes of extracellular vesicles.

Parameters Exosomes Microvesicles Apoptotic bodies
Size 40–150 nm 24 50–1000 nm 25 500–2000 nm
Density 1.13–1.19 g/mL 24 1.04–1.07 g/mL 25 1.16–1.28 g/mL
Origin Endocytic 18 Budding from plasma membrane 17 Blebbing of plasma membrane 17
Composition Higher level of ceramide compared to plasma membrane 26 Similar distribution of the lipids like that of plasma membrane. The difference lies in even distribution of major membrane lipids such as phosphatidylserine, phosphatidyl ethanolamine etc.: 25 Presence of phosphatidylserine on the cell surface (externalization) along with Annexin, FasL/FasR, TNFα/TNFR1Apo2L/DR5 21
Contents MHC, miRNA, Non-coding RNA 27 Cytoplasmic protein, Membrane proteins, Receptor proteins, miRNA, mRNA 28 Various cell organelles, DNA, Nuclear fractions. 29
Biomarkers TSPAN29, TSPAN30, CD81, CD82, CD9 TSG101, CD63 30 Integrins, selectins, metalloproteinase 31 Annexin V positive and phospatidylserine (PS) 32

Exosomes

Exosomes are specific type of EVs that resembles structures of cells. 33 They are now recognised for playing significant roles in cellular communication through various methods. Cell–cell communication occurs via the delivery of peptides, metabolites, and nucleic acids to targeted cells.

Exosomes have certain biological properties like immune response, 34 repairing tissues, 35 , 36 stem cell maintenance, 37 etc. Biological properties of exosomes such as immune response regulation is due to the secretion of the extracellular vesicles from the dendritic cells (DC). This process helps in the transfer of peptides like major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) to other DC. Membrane proteins are also transferred intracellularly during the interaction between CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Exosomes derived from DCs have been found to be distinct intercellular vectors. Hence DC-derived exosomes aid in the regulation and maintenance of the immune response. Exosomes also help in the process of tissue repair after an injury. The process of tissue repair has been observed in the exosomes that are derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC-Ex). Mesenchymal stem cells derived from the human umbilical cord (HucMSC-Ex) prevent apoptosis and accelerate the process of healing by promoting the cell proliferation. Re-epithelialization of the cells during wound healing is due for the activation of Wnt/β-catenin derived from the HucMSC-Ex. During this process there will be an increased expression of proteins such as collagen I, PCNA (proliferative Cell Nuclear Antigen) and CK 19 (Cytokeratin 19) respectively that promotes wound healing and tissue repair. HucMSC-Ex are found to cure renal tube injuries and has a function in escalating the cell–cell communication. 38 Treatment of a wound with HucMSC-Ex reverses AKT (AK Strain Transforming) inhibition and promotes proliferation of the cells thus helping in the healing process. Cell–cell communication by the exosomes also helps in maintenance of pluripotency in neighbouring cells including the embryonic stem cells (ES Cells). ES cells derived from the membrane vesicles or exosomes tend to express proteins responsible for the self-renewal and maintenance of stem cells and its pluripotency. Maintenance of pluripotency will be done by enhanced expression of proteins such as Oct-4, Nanog and Rex 1 respectively. Overexpression of Wnt along with these proteins also enhances the pluripotency of cells thus helps in maintaining the same throughout the generations. These vesicles are involved in various clinical applications such as carriers used to transport cargo for therapeutic purposes. 39 These vesicles are preferred due to their reduced immunogenicity and structure. The structure of exosomes includes the closed lipid bilayer thus protecting them from the degradation of cargo. This membrane composition helps these to cross the membranes of the brain including the blood–brain barrier easily and freely compared to other carrier substances. 40 , 41 Even though all these advantages make the exosomes an excellent vehicle for cargo transport, the major disadvantage is difficulty in targeting specific organs by reducing the off-target distribution. 41 43

Off target distribution of the exosomes is a major challenge in using exosomes as a delivery vehicle. To override this problem the exosomes can be surface modified easily by using chemical modification and genetic engineering. In the process of genetic engineering, the gene sequence of the guiding polypeptide will be fused with membrane proteins of the exosomes. This method is best suited for the surface display of only the membrane proteins on the exosomes. A wide range of surface modification can be achieved through chemical modification strategies. 44 This method facilitates display of wide range of both natural and artificial ligands on the exosomes by assembly of fats. Reactions through conjugation will modify the exosomes in a stable manner, but the efficiency of this reaction will be reduced due to the intricacy of the proteins on the surface of exosomes. Assembly of the lipids on the exosomal membranes will cause exosome toxicity. Compared to the method of chemical modification, genetic engineering is more favoured due to its high advantages. It is the most convenient method to impose changes on the exosomes. Genetic engineering is done by the fusion of peptides or ligands of interest on the transmembrane proteins of the exosomes followed by transfection of the donor cells with an engineered plasmid, which facilitates the release of modified exosomes to the target cells or tissues. The lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP) family that includes LAMP-2B is currently the major exosomal surface protein used. LAMP-2B family is localized to endosomes and lysosomes with a very small fraction expressed on the exosomal surface (only N terminus). 45 LAMP-2B has been used in targeting various tissues, for example, the RVG (rabies virus glycoprotein) peptide of rabies virus fused to LAMP-2B was effectively delivered to acetylcholine receptors and hence delivered drugs to specific areas of the brain. This has been used in targeted therapy of Alzheimer’s disease and it also helps in neurogenesis. 46 LAMP-2B was also used in another experiment to deliver exosomes loaded with doxorubicin to target breast cancer cells through intravenous injection. Besides LAMP-2B, the tetraspanin superfamily CD63/CD9/CD81 are also used in exosome engineering. All these protein families can be used in surface modification and targeting; hence these can be used to prevent off-targeting.

Exosomes carries different types of cargoes that includes proteins, amino acids, lipid and its derivatives and various metabolites. 47 Shape of exosomes varies from spherical shape when it is in solution, but it changes to biconcave, or cup-shaped during the phases of processing. 48 The major cargo proteins include the tetraspanin class of proteins such as CD9, CD63, CD53, etc., that helps in targeting, 49 ESCRT (Endosomal Sorting Complexes Repaired for Transport) proteins required an endosomal sorting complex is essential for the translocation, certain other peptides such as integrins, heat shock proteins (HSP), etc. 50 as shown in Figure 2. Other than the common protein cargoes cell-specific peptides such as Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I and MHC class II depend on type of donor cells. 51

Figure 2. Diagram illustrating the composition of exosomes.

Figure 2.

Exosomes also contain cluster of nucleic acids such as deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid, non-coding RNA and micro RNAs (miRs) make up one of the abundant types of RNAs in the exosome. 52 The exosomal membrane also consists of many lipid derivatives such as ceramide, and sphingomyelin that help to sort cargoes, transportation, secretion, etc., ribosomal RNA (rRNA), long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), small nucleolar RNA, and p-element-induced wimpy testis (piwi)-interacting RNA are some of the other exosomal RNA species that have an impact on biological processes, particularly in tumour development. 39 , 53

Microvesicles

Microvesicles (ectosomes or microparticles) are a type of EV that gets produced from the cell membranes. 54 In eukaryotes and other multicellular organisms microvesicles are also found in body fluids and tissues along with the other extracellular vesicles. Size of the microvesicles ranges from 30 nm to 1000 nm. 55 Microvesicles function similar to other extracellular vesicles in the process, such as tumour immune supression, metastasis, angiogenesis etc. 56 Microvesicles also helps in the removal of proteins misfolded during protein translocation and it helps in the removal of cell wastes or cell debris from the cellular microenvironment. 57 Cancer growth and metastasis can be determined from the level of microvesicles in the body. Hence microvesicles can also be used as biomarkers.

Large number of molecules are present inside the microvesicles. Microvesicles do not contain organelles like that of the cells. It is devoid of nucleus, golgi, endoplasmic reticulum etc. Hence microvesicles are not regarded as the intact cells. 58 , 59 Membranes of the microvesicles are made of membrane lipids as well as proteins. Main function of all the microvesicles is membrane transport and fusion. The membrane is made of phopholipid bilayer and also houses different kinds of proteins. 58

Some proteins are specific to the origin while some are common to all the microvesicles. Some tetraspanin family of proteins such as CD9, CD37, and CD63 can be seen on the surface of microvesicles. 58 61 These surface markers helps in the protein sorting and selection of specific cargoes into lumen of microvesicles or membrane. 62 In addition to lipids ad peptides microvesicles also contains some nucleic acid such as messenger RNA ( mRNA) and microRNA ( miRNA). 61

Apoptotic bodies

Cells undergoing the process of apoptosis release certain extracellular vesicles called as apoptotic bodies. Its size ranges from 500 nm–2 μm and they are more in number compared to other extracellular vesicles. Appearance of apoptotic bodies is an indicator of cell death or apoptosis while the other extracellular vesicles such as exosomes and microvesicles plays a major role in intercellular trafficking. 63 A single cell may produce large number of apoptotic bodies during the apoptosis. Apoptotic bodies (ApoBDs) varies in the content as well as in the size. 64 The contents within the apoptotic bodies varies accordingly such as chromatin remnants, some parts of chromatin, some organelles or portions of it. 65 Apoptotic bodies are one of the least studied extracellular vesicles. Apoptotic bodies forms during the process of apoptosis and large number of apoptotic bodies will be released during the death of a single cell. Apoptotic bodies are engulfed by macrophages or cancer cells after being released in extracellular space and are then broken down in phagolysosomes. “Tingible body macrophages” are macrophages that consume apoptotic cells. 66 , 67

Removal of apoptotic bodies doesn’t produce any inflammatory reactions within the body as there is no release of any free contents or cellular debris to the extracellular environment. Once the ApoBDs are produced they will be engulfed by phagocytes thus preventing the process of necrosis. The phagocytes after the engulfment doesn’t produce certain inflammatory cytokines thus preventing any complications in the body during the apoptosis and formation of ApoBDs. 68 , 69

Biodistribution of extracellular vesicles

Cells like dendritic cells, stem cells, macrophages, etc. will secrete exosomes. 70 Exosomes are widely distributed and found in various body fluids such as synovial fluid, breast milk, urine, blood plasma, saliva, and amniotic fluid. 71 The biodistribution of exosomes is dependent on the mode of administration of the same. 70 The administration through the intravenous route results in biodistribution of the exosomes to various organs such as the liver, kidney, lungs, and spleen, 70 and this intravenous injection of exosomes will result in rapid clearance from the bloodstream, but other methods like intranasal allows the fast transport to the brain. 40 , 72 Therefore, exosomes are believed to be used as one of the best vehicles for targeted drug delivery. The size of exosomes also matters when targeting specific locations as the larger exosomes will get trapped in lymph nodes, bones as well as in liver. 73 Targeting the exosomes to a specific area is important for the delivery of exosome contents to the target. Targeted delivery is often dependent on the markers present on surface of exosomes. 74

Although circulating microparticles are seen within blood of the individuals without any disease conditions. The levels of microvesicles drastically increase during certain diseases like hypertension, cardiovascular diseases 75 and pre-eclampsia 76 etc. In some instances the surface molecules of the endothelial micoparticles change, thus it can be regarded as the indicator of various diseases. Microvesicles are shed into the outer environment by membrane fission by formation of invaginating bodies to the outer environment. Budding of these extracellular vesicles depends on the specific locations depending on the type of proteins and lipids incorporated. Microvesicles are released at the specific location after the cargo loading. 77

Apoptotic bodies are a special types of extracellular vesicles that are released from the cell that is undergoing apoptosis. ApoBDs are specifically formed from the plasma membrane through the process of membrane blebbing. These structures are found throughout the body during the apoptosis and it is also a carrier of DNA, RNA, and lipids etc. and are considered as tiny sealed pouches. 78

Transport of extracellular vesicles and reaching target sites

Once extracellular vesicles has been released from the donor cells or tissues, it will interact with the target tissues through endocytosis. Once the EVs has entered, it releases cargo into the target cells. 79

Exosomes on reaching the target sites interacts with receptors on cell membrane or it will be internalized. The cell surface peptides bind with the surface ligands of EV and trigger a cascade of reactions to activate the target cells. This process is used in the process of immunomodulation and apoptosis respectively. 80

EV uptake can also be done through the mechanism of membrane fusion, where the fusion of two hydrophobic membranes occurs. During this process, EVs interact with cells through plasma membrane fusion and content release. Fusion of membranes are employed by SNARE (Soluble N-Ethylmaleimide Sensitive Factor Activating Protein receptor) and RAB (Ras- Associated Binding) proteins 81 , 82 The various methods through which EVs are taken up by the cells is depicted in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Diagram illustrating methods of EV uptake by the cells.

Figure 3.

Another method by which exosome components are delivered to target cells is through internalization process. Endocytic pathways are used in the process of internalization where the contents of the exosomes are delivered to target cells. 83 85 The process of cellular uptake is temperature sensitive and is directly proportional to the temperature fluctuations.

Endocytosis mediated by clathrin molecules is characterized by the involvement of receptors and ligands. This method of internalization occurs in various types of cells like ovarian and colon tumour cells, 74 , 86 , 87 cardiomyocytes, 88 hepatocytes, 89 macrophages, 89 , 90 etc. are intenalized by clathrin protein. Dynamin-2 protein plays an important role in clathrin-mediated endocytosis and helps in the scission of the vesicle by forming a collar shaped structure in the neck of invagination. Inhibition of this protein shows reduced exosome uptake by macrophages. 90 92 In certain cancer cell types, exosome uptake is enhanced by a transferrin receptor protein. This exosome uptake pathway is mediated by exosome and cargo composition. Caveolin dependent endocytosis (CDE) also has an important function in internalization. In CDE, plasma membrane forms tiny, cave-like invaginations called caveolar vesicles that are eventually torn off and absorbed into the cell. The cell membrane contains caveolin that forms glycolipid rafts like cholesterol, sphingolipid. Caveolin proteins help in the formation of caveolae and for the generation of caveolin rich rafts caveolin has to be oligomerized. 93 A particular type of caveolin protein called caveolin 1 is considered as important for the EV uptake 94 and its inactivation resulted in defective uptake or no uptake.

Ruffled extensions of the plasma membrane during macropinocytosis or cell drinking causes the internilization of EVs thus releasing the cargo into specific locations. For the process of macropinocytosis to occur, it requires the activation of Rac1 GTPase for the invagination and also it requires proper functioning of Na +/H + exchanger and cholesterol. 95 , 96 It has been observed that impairment of the same results in the failure of EV uptake.

Phagocytosis is also considered as one of the methods by which EV uptake occurs into the cells. Phagocytosis or “cell eating” is opposite to macropinocytosis or “cell drinking”. Unlike pinocytosis, this process does not require ruffles of the membrane for the engulfment of EVs, instead it involves the formation of membrane invaginations. Compared to other modes of EV uptake, phagocytosis is regarded as the most effective. 97

Biological functions of extracellular vesicles

EVs secreted from various types of cells through different mechanisms has proved to be biologically important. Extracellular vesicles are most popularly known as the carrier vehicles for most of the cargoes such as nucleic acids, drugs,proteins etc; and it delivers these substances to the specific receptor cells. Hence these nanocarriers are regarded as the most effective vehicles for the transportation of biological agents. It has been observed that the function of EVs depend upon the type of cargoes they carry. EVs carrying certain RNAs or long non coding RNAs help in the development of certain types of cancers. 98 Even though some studies proved that cargo carried by EVs results in cancer development, some studies have proved that these cargo loaded EVs help in treating cancer. 99 Function of EVs also depends on the cell of origin. EVs produced from some cancer cells promotes cell communications, thus producing specific signals for apoptosis, cell migration, growth etc. 100 Thus EVs aid in the determining the fate of certain cells. Function of EVs also depends upon the nature of the cargoes carried by them. In a study conducted by Xue et al., 2017, it was explained that EV loaded with circular ribonucleic acid plays a role in the proliferation of Hepatocellular carcinoma cells. 101 It was observed that the expression of some biomarkers such as cyclin D1 and EZH2 (Enhancer of Zeste Homolog) were increased rapidly due to the presence of circRASSF2 in the case of laryngeal squamous carcinoma (LSCC). Thus it was confirmed that cargo loaded EVs has the capacity to control the growth of the cells. 102 Role of EVs in promoting autophagy and apoptosis has been a milestone in the treatment of cancer. EV loaded with certain anticancerous substances has been proved to promote cell death in HCC as well as in Glioblastoma. 103

Role of extracellular vesicles in pathogenesis

According to Zitvogel et al., 1998, EVs such as exosomes obtained from the Dendritic cells and can express major histocompatibility complex I. Exosomes are also involved in various disease conditions such as a variety of cardiovascular physiological and pathological conditions. 104 , 105 Recent research has found exosomes released from mammalian cells with normal physiology contributed to cell–cell communication in cardiac tissues. These vesicles consist of proteins, lipids, and genetic materials. Vesicles released by the cardiac cells consist of APOBDs, MVs and exosomes. 106 It has been observed that exosomes are released from different cells within the heart and hence they are involved in various cardiac pathophysiological conditions.

It was noted that EVs play a major role in development of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis mainly occurs due to endothelial dysfunction due to impediment in the normal blood flow through the endothelium. Endothelial dysfunction occurs due to the increased secretion of oxidized LDL and homocysteine in the serum. According to Tsuda, 2015, ox-LDL and Hcy release the HSP70-containing exosomes from cultured aortic ECs which in turn induces the activity of monocytes through the proinflammatory differentiation of macrophages, further resulting in the development of atherosclerosis. 107 Once atherosclerosis has formed, the blood vessels will be narrowed due to subsequent accumulation of plaque over years. The plaques once formed lead to irregular blood flow, leading to blood clots, and finally complete occlusion of the artery, finally leading to myocardial ischaemic injury. Myocardial ischaemic injury is caused due to alterations in the circulation of micro-RNA and the majority of circulating miRs are found enclosed within the EVs. Under any conditions of stress, fibroblasts promote the pathological hypertrophy of cardiac cells through exosomes and their micro-RNA load. In peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), the elevation of miR-146a in endothelial cells blocks the blood vessel formation and increased release of endothelial cells derived miR-146a-enriched exosomes. The EVs once released from the endothelial cardiomyocytes results in the advancement of levels of miR-146a. This process will cause reduced expression of miR-146a target proteins like Erbb4, Notch1, and Irak1 in cardiomyocytes that causes decreased metabolic function. From these findings, it can be inferred the miRNA-based cell interaction of endothelial cells and cardiac muscle cells involves EVs, and hence EVs are also responsible for various cardiac pathologies.

EVs has a role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. These disorders include the deposition of a specific protein in neuroanatomical locations. It is proved that major proteins involved in the pathology of these diseases are transported by the exosomes. The cerebrospinal fluid and blood of the neurodegenerative diseases affected individuals contain exosomes loaded with aggregated proteins that are specific to these diseases. Moreover, exosomes provide a favourable condition for protein transport into the brain. 108

The role of EVs in cancer involves the transfer of cancer-causing proteins and nucleic acids that mediates the activities of the cells like its role in tumourigenesis. 109 EVs obtained from the tumour cells facilitate tumour angiogenesis by converting the fibroblast and mesenchymal cells into myofibroblast. EVs isolated from the tumours can move neutrophils and skew the M2 polarization of the macrophages that helps in promoting the metastasis of the tumours. These exosomes also help in the development of multidrug resistance to the tumour cells by transferring certain MDR proteins and miRNAs as well as exporting drugs against and by neutralizing antibody-based drugs. 113 Extracellular vesicles can thus play a dual function in cancer regulation, preventing or boosting growth, based on their bioactive payload and cell from where it originated.

Role of extracellular vesicles in the cancer treatment

Since it has been proved that EVs unload their contents into the target cells, it has developed attraction in the field of oncotherapy. 110 112 Various methods are being used in recent times to cure cancer using extracellular vesicles as described below:

Using EVs derived from the immune cells to suppress the growth of cancer cells

In cancer immunity, the dendritic cells are involved in the inhibition of tumour growth and metastasis, and this is done by capturing the new antigens or foreign bodies and hence producing the marked antibody response that involves cytotoxicity to specific tumour. 113 EVs derived from the dendritic cells contain specific cargoes that are responsible for the antigen presentation and hence it acts as a perfect treatment for cancer. 114 Zitvogel et al., 1998, 115 suggested that tumour peptide-pulsed dendritic cell-derived exosomes could activate the cytotoxic T cells-based activity to reduce the metastatic growth in mouse that occurs within the body. In a study done by Munich et al., 2012, it was observed that dendritic cells kill the tumour cells and activate the natural killer cells through the TNF family ligands. 116

Inhibition of cancer derived EVs release

EVs derived from the cancer cells cannot be used for the treatment of cancer as it will accelerate the growth of cancer by providing favourable conditions for metastasis, immune escape, angiogenesis, drug resistance, etc. 89 , 90 Therefore, the effective treatment of cancer can be achieved by inhibiting the synthesis, release, and uptake of the cancer derived EVs. 117 Another technique to slow tumour growth is to use a haemofiltration system to remove circulating EVs. Tumours secrete a large number of EVs such as exosomes into the extracellular space, and it carries oncoproteins, immune suppressive molecules that help in tumour progression and metastasis. Several strategies have been proposed for targeting the malignant activities of tumours. Haemofiltration of the EVs is done to remove the circulating EVs from the blood. It is done using an affinity plasmapheresis platform known as adaptive dialysis-like affinity platform technology (ADAPT TM) system that helps to override the toxicity risks interactions of the drugs. This technique uses certain affinity agents that includes lectins and antibodies binding to EVs. These agents will be immobilized in the outer capillary space of plasma filtration membranes. This setup is like existing kidney dialysis system. Working principle for this setup is, when the patient’s blood passes through this device, the plasma components that are <200 nm will move through the porous fibres through the capillary action to interact with the substances that are immobilized on the device. The target molecules will bind tightly to the agent while other components of the blood will pass through the membrane. This device is multifaceted since large number of antibodies and other high affinity substances such as ligands can be absorbed into the cartridges to capture single or multiple targets. Although ADAPTTM therapies necessitate vascular surgery for patients, this subtractive approach to treat cancer using exosomes would avoid drug toxicity or any interaction hazards, thus giving it an edge over other pharmacological methods. As a result, the concept of this device offers a method for targeting exosomes that needs to be investigated for its potential as an additional therapeutic candidate to current cancer therapy protocols. This alternative could also be used as a therapeutic option for curing immunological dysfunction and improving immune responses to tumour growth. 118

EVs as carriers of genes

EVs are being regarded as the effective carriers of the gene, but the usage of exosomes derived from the natural sources are difficult to study and expected therapeutic effects are achieved very rarely. The EVs that are modified through genetic engineering are more effective against cancer. EVs can also be used as miRNA carriers for effective treatment against cancer. 119 miRNAs are tiny noncoding RNAs, and these are small and endogenous in nature. These miRNAs are used as an effective tool for cancer therapy. The major drawback of these miRNA mediated delivery is that miRNAs molecules get destroyed quickly in in vivo conditions. Therefore, the delivery of miRNA to specific location is considered as a difficult task. But if these miRNAs are encapsulated within the EVs, these can be delivered at the target site. 120 124 EVs enriched with the anti-glioma miRNA (miRNA-146b) can decrease growth of glioma in the laboratory conditions according to Katakowski et al., 2013. 125 EVs enriched in miR-101 can also inhibit osteosarcoma cell invasion/migration in vitro and metastasis in vivo. 46 EVs are also being used as protein carriers for cancer therapy, where these can be loaded with tumour antigens, 126 proteins that induce apoptosis, 127 mutant and deficient proteins in apoptosis, several nanobodies, 128 transferrin, and lactoferrins, 129 proteasomes 129 etc. for targeted therapy. Dendritic cells are used for T cell mediated immunotherapy by presenting the antigen from tumour to naïve T cells. But due to the low life span of DCs its use is limited. 130 When compared to antigen presenting DCs, the exosomes isolated from the dendritic cells consists of complexes made from major histocompatibility factors and peptides and some co-stimulatory molecules on their membrane, that allows them to continue with the antigen presentation and enhance the process of immunisation in murine models. 131 Survivin, an anti-apoptotic protein, suppresses the activation of cell death in large number of cancer cells.

According to the studies conducted by Aspe and wall in 2010, it was observed that Survivin-T34A has an inactive mutation that reduces its pro-survival function that causes caspase activation followed by death of tumour cells. 132

EVs as carriers of chemotherapeutic drugs

Anti-tumour chemotherapeutic medicines can successfully kill tumour cells that are rapidly developing. However, these medications have the potential to harm normal, healthy, fast-growing cells, resulting in major side effects. Furthermore, it is difficult for some hydrophobic medicines to target tumour cells with specificity. As a result, these formulations need more specific and efficient carrier. EVs have the capacity to be an efficient carrier for chemotherapeutic drugs as a result of their stable lipid bilayer structure. 119 Chemotherapeutic drug-loaded exosomes particularly targeting cancer stem cells in vivo are the best exosome cancer therapy. Exosome-mediated chemotherapeutic administration has been proven to have significantly better anti-tumour effects in animal tumour models than free medicines. Doxorubicin, for example, is a frequent chemotherapy medication to treat haematolog ical cancers and a variety of solid tumours. 133 Paclitaxel is another antimitotic chemotherapeutic medication that is commonly used in cancer treatment. 134 , 135 Sonication can be used to load paclitaxel into exosomes, and it has proved to be 50 times more cytotoxic than the free paclitaxel in drug-resistant cancer cells in vitro. In a rat model of Lewis lung carcinoma, they can also significantly reduce tumour size and stop pulmonary metastasis. 136 This suggests that paclitaxel contained in exosomes can target drug-resistant CSCs directly. Furthermore, paclitaxel-loaded exosomes from prostate cancer cells had increased cytotoxicity in autologous cancer cells. 137 Drug-pre-treated donor cells can also create drug-loaded exosomes, which is interesting. EVs produced from mesenchymal stem cells treated with paclitaxel, for example, had a significant suppressing activity on tumour cells of pancreas. 138

Role of extracellular vesicles in treatment of other diseases

Even though extracellular vesicles contribute to the pathology of some diseases it is also used as a therapeutic agent against certain diseases other than cancer. EVs loaded with cargo have proved to be effective against some diseases. Upadhya and Shetty, 2021, observed the therapeutic effects of EVs on the Parkinsons disease model (PD). It was studied that MSC -derived EVs protect dopaminergic neurons thus reducing apoptosis. This leads to the improved motor function in the Parkinson disease models. Hence it has been proved that EVs are effective against neurodegenerative diseases. 139

EVs also contributes to the protection of cardiac cells thus acting as a cardioprotective agent. EVs obtained from stem cells provide cardio protection, thus acting as a therapeutic tool against cardiovascular diseases. Stem cell-derived preconditioned cardioprotective exosomes are believed to be involved in cardio protective mechanisms. Hence Exosomes play an important role in cardioprotective as well as pathological conditions of heart cells. 105

EVs are also known to provide protection against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) produced from dextran sodium sulfate through intestinal stem cell and epithelial regeneration. It was observed that EVs derived from the MSC-derived EVs resulted in normal functioning by downregulating inflammatory responses, thus promoting the regeneration of epithelial cells or tissues. Hence EVs can be used as a medicine for treating IBD. 140

Challenges of extracellular vesicles in drug delivery

There are lots of challenges in using EVs as a delivery vehicle. Firstly there are no effective methods for isolation of EVs from various sources. Nowadays EVs are isolated using chemicals such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) which provides low specificity but high recovery. EVs isolated using ultracentrifugation method, size-based isolation techniques; immunoaffinity capture-based techniques; precipitation; microfluidics-based isolation technique provides medium recovery and specificity. Immunoaffinity based techniques and isolation using microfluidics are considered as low recovery with high specificity. Hence there is a requirement of high yielding, more economical and time saving method for the isolation. 141

Second challenge is limited drug loading efficiency of EVs compared to other nanoparticles like liposomes. The reduced efficiency causes difficulty in loading exogenous drug into the EVs thus making it a great barrier in using the same for other applications. This may be due to its small size and reduced capacity compared to liposomes or other nanovesicles. This can be resolved by using efficient drug loading strategies like transfection, co-incubation for longer time, electroporation, rapid freeze thaw cycles. 141

The third major challenge is instability of EVs when stored for longer time. It has been observed that EVs that are stored for longer time in −80°C loses its viability and efficiency within 2 weeks. Hence, there is a requirement of more efficient storage method that will preserve EVs for longer duration without degrading it. 142

Conclusion and future perspectives

EVs, as a natural carrier, is developing as a promising agent in cancer treatment. EV based cancer therapies include employing naturally produced immune cell exosomes to reduce tumour cells, blocking cancer cell-derived EV activity, and exploiting EVs as cargo carriers. Using EVs as a potent carrier protein involves lots of advantages as well as challenges. The advantages are EVs are less toxic and immunogenic than synthesized nanoparticles because they are more biocompatible and biodegradable. 143 Although other extracellular vesicles obtained from different cells are biologically compatible, they are bigger and more ubiquitously distributed than exosomes, which limits their use in loading and distribution of drug. EVs are very simple to produce because most cell types can manufacture them. Additionally, EVs are present in almost all the body fluids, and their small size allows them to bypass lung clearance and cross the blood–brain barrier. 144 , 145 Even though there are lots of advantage of using exosomes as carriers, the challenges are the differentiation between exosomes from various sources is still unclear. The number of EVs required to provide a therapeutic impact may range dramatically amongst malignancies. Tumour scalability and heterogeneity may have an impact on treatment outcomes and many other roles of EVs produced from various sources have not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, nothing is known about the exosome modifications that help in providing a high degree of selectivity for specific cancer cells. The storage and stability of EVs are still unknown.

EVs offer novel and important applications in treating cancer and other diseases, despite the fact that there are many more challenges in using exosomes as carrier agents.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

References

  • 1. Raposo G, Stoorvogel W: Extracellular Vesicles: Exosomes, Microvesicles, and Friends. J. Cell Biol. 2013;200(4):373–383. 10.1083/JCB.201211138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Février B, Raposo G: Exosomes: Endosomal-Derived Vesicles Shipping Extracellular Messages. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004;16(4):415–421. 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hess C, Sadallah S, Hefti A, et al. : Ectosomes Released by Human Neutrophils Are Specialized Functional Units. J. Immunol. 1999;163(8):4564–4573. 10.4049/jimmunol.163.8.4564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cocucci E, Racchetti G, Meldolesi J: Shedding Microvesicles: Artefacts No More. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19(2):43–51. 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. György B, Módos K, Pállinger É, et al. : Detection and Isolation of Cell-Derived Microparticles Are Compromised by Protein Complexes Resulting from Shared Biophysical Parameters. Blood. 2011;117(4):e39–e48. 10.1182/BLOOD-2010-09-307595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Simons M, Raposo G: Exosomes - Vesicular Carriers for Intercellular Communication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009;21(4):575–581. 10.1016/J.CEB.2009.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Théry C, Ostrowski M, Segura E: Membrane Vesicles as Conveyors of Immune Responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009;9(8):581–593. 10.1038/NRI2567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Simpson RJ, Jensen SS, Lim JWE: Proteomic Profiling of Exosomes: Current Perspectives. Proteomics. 2008;8(19):4083–4099. 10.1002/PMIC.200800109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Properzi F, Logozzi M, Fais S: Exosomes: The Future of Biomarkers in Medicine. 2013;7(5):769–778. 10.2217/BMM.13.63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pavlyukov MS, Yu H, Bastola S, et al. : Apoptotic Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Promote Malignancy of Glioblastoma Via Intercellular Transfer of Splicing Factors. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(1):119–135.e10. 10.1016/J.CCELL.2018.05.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Cimino-Mathews A, Thompson E, Taube JM, et al. : PD-L1 (B7-H1) Expression and the Immune Tumor Microenvironment in Primary and Metastatic Breast Carcinomas. Hum. Pathol. 2016;47(1):52–63. 10.1016/J.HUMPATH.2015.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wiklander OPB, Nordin JZ, O’Loughlin A, et al. : Extracellular Vesicle in vivo Biodistribution Is Determined by Cell Source, Route of Administration and Targeting. J. Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4(4):1–13. 10.3402/JEV.V4.26316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kostallari E, Valainathan S, Biquard L, et al. : Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Liver Diseases and Their Therapeutic Potential. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021;175:113816. 10.1016/J.ADDR.2021.05.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Galieva LR, James V, Mukhamedshina YO, et al. : Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles for the Treatment of Nerve Disorders. Front. Neurosci. 2019;13:163. 10.3389/FNINS.2019.00163/BIBTEX [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kronstadt SM, Pottash AE, Levy D, et al. : Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles for Sepsis Treatment. Adv. Ther (Weinh). 2021;4(7):2000259. 10.1002/ADTP.202000259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Born LJ, Chang KH, Shoureshi P, et al. : HOTAIR-Loaded Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell Extracellular Vesicles Enhance Angiogenesis and Wound Healing. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022;11(5):2002070. 10.1002/ADHM.202002070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Pegtel DM, Gould SJ: Exosomes. 2019;88:487–514. 10.1146/ANNUREV-BIOCHEM-013118-111902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Andaloussi S, Mäger I, Breakefield XO, et al. : Extracellular Vesicles: Biology and Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013;12(5):347–357. 10.1038/nrd3978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ettelaie C, Collier MEW, Maraveyas A, et al. : Characterization of Physical Properties of Tissue Factor– Containing Microvesicles and a Comparison of Ultracentrifuge-Based Recovery Procedures. J. Extracell Vesicles. 2014;3(1). 10.3402/JEV.V3.23592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Battistelli M, Falcieri E: Apoptotic Bodies: Particular Extracellular Vesicles Involved in Intercellular Communication. Biology (Basel). 2020;9(1). 10.3390/BIOLOGY9010021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Elmore S: Apoptosis: A Review of Programmed Cell Death. Toxicol. Pathol. 2007;35(4):495–516. 10.1080/01926230701320337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Colombo M, Raposo G, Théry C: Biogenesis, Secretion, and Intercellular Interactions of Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014;30:255–289. 10.1146/ANNUREV-CELLBIO-101512-122326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Crescitelli R, Lässer C, Szabó TG, et al. : Distinct RNA Profiles in Subpopulations of Extracellular Vesicles: Apoptotic Bodies, Microvesicles and Exosomes. J. Extracell Vesicles. 2013;2(1). 10.3402/JEV.V2I0.20677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kalluri R: The Biology and Function of Exosomes in Cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126(4):1208–1215. 10.1172/JCI81135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Revenfeld ALS, Bæk R, Nielsen MH, et al. : Diagnostic and Prognostic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles in Peripheral Blood. Clin. Ther. 2014;36(6):830–846. 10.1016/J.CLINTHERA.2014.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Théry C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S: Exosomes: Composition, Biogenesis and Function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2(8):569–579. 10.1038/nri855 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Zhang J, Li S, Li L, et al. : Exosome and Exosomal MicroRNA: Trafficking, Sorting, and Function. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2015;13(1):17–24. 10.1016/J.GPB.2015.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Lee Y, Andaloussi S, Wood MJA: Exosomes and Microvesicles: Extracellular Vesicles for Genetic Information Transfer and Gene Therapy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012;21(R1):R125–R134. 10.1093/HMG/DDS317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chen B, Li Q, Zhao B, et al. : Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as a Novel Potential Therapeutic Tool for Tissue Repair. 6:1753–1758. 10.1002/sctm.16-0477 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zhang X, Wang X, Zhu H, et al. : Hsp20 Functions as a Novel Cardiokine in Promoting Angiogenesis via Activation of VEGFR2. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32765. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0032765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kajdos M, Janas Ł, Kolasa-Zwierzchowska D, et al. : Microvesicles as a Potential Biomarker of Neoplastic Diseases and Their Role in Development and Progression of Neoplasm. Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny. 2015;14(4):283–291. 10.5114/PM.2015.56540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wlodkowic D, Telford W, Skommer J, et al. : Apoptosis and Beyond: Cytometry in Studies of Programmed Cell Death. Methods Cell Biol. 2011;103:55–98. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385493-3.00004-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Johnstone RM, Adam M, Hammond JR, et al. : Vesicle Formation during Reticulocyte Maturation. Association of Plasma Membrane Activities with Released Vesicles (Exosomes). J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262(19):9412–9420. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)48095-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Nolte-’t Hoen ENM, Buschow SI, Anderton SM, et al. : Activated T Cells Recruit Exosomes Secreted by Dendritic Cells via LFA-1. Blood. 2009;113(9):1977–1981. 10.1182/BLOOD-2008-08-174094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Zhang B, Wang M, Gong A, et al. : HucMSC- Exosome Mediated-Wnt4 Signaling Is Required for Cutaneous Wound Healing. Stem Cells. 2015;33(7):2158–2168. 10.1002/STEM.1771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Cui X, He Z, Liang Z, et al. : Exosomes From Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Protect the Myocardium Against Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Through Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2017;70(4):225–231. 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ratajczak J, Miekus K, Kucia M, et al. : Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Microvesicles Reprogram Hematopoietic Progenitors: Evidence for Horizontal Transfer of MRNA and Protein Delivery. Leukemia. 2006;20(5):847–856. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Schorey JS, Bhatnagar S: Exosome Function: From Tumor Immunology to Pathogen Biology. Traffic. 2008;9(6):871–881. 10.1111/J.1600-0854.2008.00734.X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu H, et al. : Exosomes: Biogenesis, Biologic Function and Clinical Potential. Cell Biosci. 2019;9(1):1–18. 10.1186/S13578-019-0282-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Haney MJ, Klyachko NL, Zhao Y, et al. : Exosomes as Drug Delivery Vehicles for Parkinson’s Disease Therapy. J. Control. Release. 2015;207:18–30. 10.1016/J.JCONREL.2015.03.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Mathieu M, Martin-Jaular L, Lavieu G, et al. : Specificities of Secretion and Uptake of Exosomes and Other Extracellular Vesicles for Cell-to-Cell Communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21(1):9–17. 10.1038/S41556-018-0250-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Bunggulawa EJ, Wang W, Yin T, et al. : Recent Advancements in the Use of Exosomes as Drug Delivery Systems 06 Biological Sciences 0601 Biochemistry and Cell Biology. J. Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16(1):1–13. 10.1186/S12951-018-0403-9/FIGURES/7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ha D, Yang N, Nadithe V: Exosomes as Therapeutic Drug Carriers and Delivery Vehicles across Biological Membranes: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2016;6(4):287–296. 10.1016/J.APSB.2016.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Liang Y, Duan L, Lu J, et al. : Engineering Exosomes for Targeted Drug Delivery. Theranostics. 2021;11(7):3183–3195. 10.7150/THNO.52570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Terasawa K, Tomabechi Y, Ikeda M, et al. : Lysosome-Associated Membrane Proteins-1 and -2 (LAMP-1 and LAMP-2) Assemble via Distinct Modes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;479(3):489–495. 10.1016/J.BBRC.2016.09.093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Yang J, Zhang X, Chen X, et al. : Exosome Mediated Delivery of MiR-124 Promotes Neurogenesis after Ischemia. Mol. Ther. Nucleic. Acids. 2017;7:278–287. 10.1016/J.OMTN.2017.04.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Bobrie A, Colombo M, Raposo G, et al. : Exosome Secretion: Molecular Mechanisms and Roles in Immune Responses. Traffic. 2011;12(12):1659–1668. 10.1111/J.1600-0854.2011.01225.X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Yellon DM, Davidson SM: Exosomes: Nanoparticles Involved in Cardioprotection?. Circ. Res. 2014;114(2):325–332. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Zhao L, Gu C, Gan Y, et al. : Exosome-Mediated SiRNA Delivery to Suppress Postoperative Breast Cancer Metastasis. J. Control. Release. 2020;318:1–15. 10.1016/J.JCONREL.2019.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Garcia NA, Ontoria-Oviedo I, González-King H, et al. : Glucose Starvation in Cardiomyocytes Enhances Exosome Secretion and Promotes Angiogenesis in Endothelial Cells. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0138849. 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0138849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Mashouri L, Yousefi H, Aref AR, et al. : Exosomes: Composition, Biogenesis, and Mechanisms in Cancer Metastasis and Drug Resistance. Mol. Cancer. 2019;18(1):1–14. 10.1186/S12943-019-0991-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Huang X, Yuan T, Tschannen M, et al. : Characterization of Human Plasma-Derived Exosomal RNAs by Deep Sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):1–14. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-319/FIGURES/6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ge L, Zhang N, Li D, et al. : Circulating Exosomal Small RNAs Are Promising Non- invasive Diagnostic Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020;24(24):14502–14513. 10.1111/JCMM.16077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Yáñez-Mó M, Siljander PRM, Andreu Z, et al. : Biological Properties of Extracellular Vesicles and Their Physiological Functions. J. Extracell Vesicles. 2015;4(2015):1–60. 10.3402/JEV.V4.27066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Pol E, Böing AN, Harrison P, et al. : Classification, Functions, and Clinical Relevance of Extracellular Vesicles. Pharmacol. Rev. 2012;64(3):676–705. 10.1124/PR.112.005983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Castellana D, Zobairi F, Martinez MC, et al. : Membrane Microvesicles as Actors in the Establishment of a Favorable Prostatic Tumoral Niche: A Role for Activated Fibroblasts and CX3CL1-CX3CR1 Axis. Cancer Res. 2009;69(3):785–793. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1946/654524/P/MEMBRANE-MICROVESICLES-AS-ACTORS-IN-THE [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Dhondt B, Rousseau Q, Wever O, et al. : Function of Extracellular Vesicle-Associated MiRNAs in Metastasis. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;365(3):621–641. 10.1007/S00441-016-2430-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Pap E, Pállinger É, Pásztói M, et al. : Highlights of a New Type of Intercellular Communication: Microvesicle-Based Information Transfer. Inflamm. Res. 2009;58(1):1–8. 10.1007/S00011-008-8210-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Schorey JS, Bhatnagar S: Exosome Function: From Tumor Immunology to Pathogen Biology. Traffic. 2008;9(6):871–881. 10.1111/J.1600-0854.2008.00734.X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Simpson RJ, Jensen SS, Lim JWE: Proteomic Profiling of Exosomes: Current Perspectives. Proteomics. 2008;8(19):4083–4099. 10.1002/PMIC.200800109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, et al. : Exosome-Mediated Transfer of MRNAs and MicroRNAs Is a Novel Mechanism of Genetic Exchange between Cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9(6):654–659. 10.1038/ncb1596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Raposo G, Stoorvogel W: Extracellular Vesicles: Exosomes, Microvesicles, and Friends. J. Cell Biol. 2013;200(4):373–383. 10.1083/JCB.201211138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Ihara T, Yamamoto T, Sugamata M, et al. : The Process of Ultrastructural Changes from Nuclei to Apoptotic Body. Virchows Arch. 1998;433(5):443–447. 10.1007/S004280050272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Hauser P, Wang S, Didenko VV: Apoptotic Bodies: Selective Detection in Extracellular Vesicles. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017;1554:193–200. 10.1007/978-1-4939-6759-9_12/COVER [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Battistelli M, Falcieri E: Apoptotic Bodies: Particular Extracellular Vesicles Involved in Intercellular Communication. Biology (Basel). 2020;9(1). 10.3390/BIOLOGY9010021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Blander JM: The Many Ways Tissue Phagocytes Respond to Dying Cells. Immunol. Rev. 2017;277(1):158–173. 10.1111/IMR.12537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Jiang L, Poon IKH: Methods for Monitoring the Progression of Cell Death, Cell Disassembly and Cell Clearance. Apoptosis. 2019;24(3–4):208–220. 10.1007/S10495-018-01511-X/FIGURES/3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Nagata S, Suzuki J, Segawa K, et al. : Exposure of Phosphatidylserine on the Cell Surface. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(6):952–961. 10.1038/CDD.2016.7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Poon IKH, Lucas CD, Rossi AG, et al. : Apoptotic Cell Clearance: Basic Biology and Therapeutic Potential. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14(3):166–180. 10.1038/nri3607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Kalluri R, LeBleu VS: The Biology, Function, and Biomedical Applications of Exosomes. Science. 2020;367(6478). 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAU6977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. White IJ, Bailey LM, Aghakhani MR, et al. : EGF Stimulates Annexin 1-Dependent Inward Vesiculation in a Multivesicular Endosome Subpopulation. EMBO J. 2006;25(1):1–12. 10.1038/SJ.EMBOJ.7600759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Zhuang X, Xiang X, Grizzle W, et al. : Treatment of Brain Inflammatory Diseases by Delivering Exosome Encapsulated Anti- Inflammatory Drugs from the Nasal Region to the Brain. Mol. Ther. 2011;19(10):1769–1779. 10.1038/MT.2011.164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Zhang H, Freitas D, Kim HS, et al. : Identification of Distinct Nanoparticles and Subsets of Extracellular Vesicles by Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20(3):332–343. 10.1038/s41556-018-0040-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Horibe S, Tanahashi T, Kawauchi S, et al. : Mechanism of Recipient Cell-Dependent Differences in Exosome Uptake. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):1–9. 10.1186/S12885-017-3958-1/FIGURES/5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Boulanger CM: Microparticles, Vascular Function and Hypertension. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2010;19(2):177–180. 10.1097/MNH.0B013E32833640FD [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Ling L, Huang H, Zhu L, et al. : Evaluation of Plasma Endothelial Microparticles in Pre-Eclampsia. J. Int. Med. Res. 2014;42(1):42–51. 10.1177/0300060513504362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Muralidharan-Chari V, Clancy JW, Sedgwick A, et al. : Microvesicles: Mediators of Extracellular Communication during Cancer Progression. J. Cell Sci. 2010;123(10):1603–1611. 10.1242/JCS.064386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Battistelli M, Falcieri E: Apoptotic Bodies: Particular Extracellular Vesicles Involved in Intercellular Communication. Biology (Basel). 2020;9(1) 10.3390/BIOLOGY9010021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Kwok ZH, Wang C, Jin Y: Extracellular Vesicle Transportation and Uptake by Recipient Cells: A Process to Regulate Human Diseases. Processes (Basel). 2021;9(2):1–16. 10.3390/PR9020273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Tkach M, Kowal J, Zucchetti AE, et al. : Qualitative Differences in T-Cell Activation by Dendritic Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Subtypes. EMBO J. 2017;36(20):3012–3028. 10.15252/EMBJ.201696003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Chernomordik L v, Melikyan GB, Chizmadzhev YA: Biomembrane Fusion: A New Concept Derived from Model Studies Using Two Interacting Planar Lipid Bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1987;906(3):309–352. 10.1016/0304-4157(87)90016-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Jahn R, Südhof TC: Membrane Fusion and Exocytosis. 2003;68:863–911. 10.1146/ANNUREV.BIOCHEM.68.1.863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Joshi BS, Beer MA, Giepmans BNG, et al. : Endocytosis of Extracellular Vesicles and Release of Their Cargo from Endosomes. ACS Nano. 2020;14(4):4444–4455. 10.1021/ACSNANO.9B10033/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/NN9B10033_0005.JPEG [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Tian T, Zhu YL, Hu FH, et al. : Dynamics of Exosome Internalization and Trafficking. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013;228(7):1487–1495. 10.1002/JCP.24304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Tian T, Wang Y, Wang H, et al. : Visualizing of the Cellular Uptake and Intracellular Trafficking of Exosomes by Live-Cell Microscopy. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010;111(2):488–496. 10.1002/JCB.22733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Verweij FJ, Bebelman MP, Jimenez CR, et al. : Correction: Quantifying Exosome Secretion from Single Cells Reveals a Modulatory Role for GPCR Signaling. J. Cell Biol. 2018;217(3):1157–1157. 10.1083/JCB.20170320601192018C [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Escrevente C, Keller S, Altevogt P, et al. : Interaction and Uptake of Exosomes by Ovarian Cancer Cells. BMC Cancer. 2011;11(1):1–10. 10.1186/1471-2407-11-108/FIGURES/6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Eguchi S, Takefuji M, Sakaguchi T, et al. : Cardiomyocytes Capture Stem Cell-Derived, Anti-Apoptotic MicroRNA-214 via Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis in Acute Myocardial Infarction. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294(31):11665–11674. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Benmerah A, Bayrou M, Cerf-Bensussan N, et al. : Inhibition of Clathrin-Coated Pit Assembly by an Eps15 Mutant. J. Cell Sci. 1999;112(9):1303–1311. 10.1242/JCS.112.9.1303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Feng D, Zhao WL, Ye YY, et al. : Cellular Internalization of Exosomes Occurs through Phagocytosis. Traffic. 2010;11(5):675–687. 10.1111/J.1600-0854.2010.01041.X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Barrès C, Blanc L, Bette-Bobillo P, et al. : Galectin-5 Is Bound onto the Surface of Rat Reticulocyte Exosomes and Modulates Vesicle Uptake by Macrophages. Blood. 2010;115(3):696–705. 10.1182/BLOOD-2009-07-231449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Gonda A, Moyron R, Kabagwira J, et al. : Cellular-Defined Microenvironmental Internalization of Exosomes. Extracellular Vesicles and Their Importance in Human Health. 2019. 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.86020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Parton RG, McMahon KA, Wu Y: Caveolae: Formation, Dynamics, and Function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2020;65:8–16. 10.1016/J.CEB.2020.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Costa Verdera H, Gitz-Francois JJ, Schiffelers RM, et al. : Cellular Uptake of Extracellular Vesicles Is Mediated by Clathrin-Independent Endocytosis and Macropinocytosis. J. Control. Release. 2017;266:100–108. 10.1016/J.JCONREL.2017.09.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Kerr MC, Teasdale RD: Defining Macropinocytosis. Traffic. 2009;10(4):364–371. 10.1111/J.1600-0854.2009.00878.X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Grimmer S, Deurs B, Sandvig K: Membrane Ruffling and Macropinocytosis in A431 Cells Require Cholesterol. J. Cell Sci. 2002;115(14):2953–2962. 10.1242/JCS.115.14.2953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Gordon S: Phagocytosis: An Immunobiologic Process. Immunity. 2016;44(3):463–475. 10.1016/J.IMMUNI.2016.02.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Gusachenko ON, Zenkova MA, Vlassov Vv: Nucleic Acids in Exosomes: Disease Markers and Intercellular Communication Molecules. Biochem. Mosc. 2013;78(1):1–7. 10.1134/S000629791301001X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Wang X, Qiao D, Chen L, et al. : Chemotherapeutic Drugs Stimulate the Release and Recycling of Extracellular Vesicles to Assist Cancer Cells in Developing an Urgent Chemoresistance. Mol. Cancer. 2019;18(1):1–18. 10.1186/S12943-019-1114-Z/FIGURES/7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, et al. : Exosome-Mediated Transfer of MRNAs and MicroRNAs Is a Novel Mechanism of Genetic Exchange between Cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9(6):654–659. 10.1038/ncb1596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Xue J, Liu Y, Luo F, et al. : Circ100284, via MiR-217 Regulation of EZH2, Is Involved in the Arsenite-Accelerated Cell Cycle of Human Keratinocytes in Carcinogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Mol. Basis Dis. 2017;1863(3):753–763. 10.1016/J.BBADIS.2016.12.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Tian L, Cao J, Jiao H, et al. : CircRASSF2 Promotes Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression by Regulating the MiR-302b-3p/IGF-1R Axis. Clin. Sci. 2019;133(9):1053–1066. 10.1042/CS20190110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Pavlyukov MS, Yu H, Bastola S, et al. : Apoptotic Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Promote Malignancy of Glioblastoma via Intercellular Transfer of Splicing Factors. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(1):119–135.e10. 10.1016/J.CCELL.2018.05.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Ailawadi S, Wang X, Gu H, et al. : Pathologic Function and Therapeutic Potential of Exosomes in Cardiovascular Disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2015;1852(1):1–11. 10.1016/J.BBADIS.2014.10.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Bang C, Batkai S, Dangwal S, et al. : Cardiac Fibroblast-Derived MicroRNA Passenger Strand-Enriched Exosomes Mediate Cardiomyocyte Hypertrophy. J. Clin. Invest. 2014;124(5):2136–2146. 10.1172/JCI70577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Ribeiro MF, Zhu H, Millard RW, et al. : Exosomes Function in Pro- and Anti-Angiogenesis. Curr Angiogenes. 2013;2(1):54–59. 10.2174/22115528113020020001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Zhang Y, Hu YW, Zheng L, et al. : Characteristics and Roles of Exosomes in Cardiovascular Disease. DNA Cell Biol. 2017;36(3):202–211. 10.1089/DNA.2016.3496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Howitt J, Hill AF: Exosomes in the Pathology of Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291(52):26589–26597. 10.1074/JBC.R116.757955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Samanta S, Rajasingh S, Drosos N, et al. : Exosomes: New Molecular Targets of Diseases. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2018;39(4):501–513. 10.1038/APS.2017.162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Liu H, Chen L, Peng Y, et al. : Dendritic Cells Loaded with Tumor Derived Exosomes for Cancer Immunotherapy. Oncotarget. 2018;9(2):2887–2894. 10.18632/ONCOTARGET.20812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Gilligan KE, Dwyer RM: Engineering Exosomes for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18(6) 10.3390/IJMS18061122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Gomari H, Moghadam MF, Soleimani M: Targeted Cancer Therapy Using Engineered Exosome as a Natural Drug Delivery Vehicle. Onco. Targets. Ther. 2018;11:5753–5762. 10.2147/OTT.S173110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Chen DS, Mellman I: Oncology Meets Immunology: The Cancer-Immunity Cycle. Immunity. 2013;39(1):1–10. 10.1016/J.IMMUNI.2013.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Pitt JM, André F, Amigorena S, et al. : Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes for Cancer Therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126(4):1224–1232. 10.1172/JCI81137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Zitvogel L, Regnault A, Lozier A, et al. : Eradication of Established Murine Tumors Using a Novel Cell-Free Vaccine: Dendritic Cell Derived Exosomes. Nat. Med. 1998;4(5):594–600. 10.1038/nm0598-594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Munich S, Sobo-Vujanovic A, Buchser WJ, et al. : Dendritic Cell Exosomes Directly Kill Tumor Cells and Activate Natural Killer Cells via TNF Superfamily Ligands. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1(7):1074–1083. 10.4161/ONCI.20897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Bobrie A, Krumeich S, Reyal F, et al. : Rab27a Supports Exosome-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms That Modify the Tumor Microenvironment and Can Promote Tumor Progression. Cancer Res. 2012;72(19):4920–4930. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Marleau AM, Chen CS, Joyce JA, et al. : Exosome Removal as a Therapeutic Adjuvant in Cancer. J. Transl. Med. 2012;10(1):1–12. 10.1186/1479-5876-10-134/FIGURES/3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Schulze A, Deng F: A Review on Exosome-Based Cancer Therapy. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2020;2020. 10.20517/2394-4722.2020.79 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Daßler-Plenker J, Küttner V, Egeblad M: Communication in Tiny Packages: Exosomes as Means of Tumor-Stroma Communication. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2020;1873(2):188340. 10.1016/J.BBCAN.2020.188340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Hannafon BN, Ding WQ: Intercellular Communication by Exosome-Derived MicroRNAs in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14(7):14240–14269. 10.3390/IJMS140714240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Deng F, Miller J: A Review on Protein Markers of Exosome from Different Bio-Resources and the Antibodies Used for Characterization. J. Histotechnol. 2019;42(4):226–239. 10.1080/01478885.2019.1646984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Deng F, Magee N, Zhang Y: Decoding the Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Liver Diseases. Liver Res. 2017;1(3):147–155. 10.1016/J.LIVRES.2017.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Bruschi M, Ravera S, Santucci L, et al. : The Human Urinary Exosome as a Potential Metabolic Effector Cargo. Expert Rev. Proteomics. 2015;12(4):425–432. 10.1586/14789450.2015.1055324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Katakowski M, Buller B, Zheng X, et al. : Exosomes from Marrow Stromal Cells Expressing MiR-146b Inhibit Glioma Growth. Cancer Lett. 2013;335(1):201–204. 10.1016/J.CANLET.2013.02.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Cho JA, Yeo DJ, Son HY, et al. : Exosomes: A New Delivery System for Tumor Antigens in Cancer Immunotherapy. Int. J. Cancer. 2005;114(4):613–622. 10.1002/IJC.20757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Hall J, Prabhakar S, Balaj L, et al. : Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins via Extracellular Vesicles: Review and Potential Treatments for Parkinson’s Disease, Glioma, and Schwannoma. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016;36(3):417–427. 10.1007/S10571-015-0309-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Malhotra H, Sheokand N, Kumar S, et al. : Exosomes: Tunable Nano Vehicles for Macromolecular Delivery of Transferrin and Lactoferrin to Specific Intracellular Compartment. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2016;12(5):1101–1114. 10.1166/JBN.2016.2229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Lai RC, Tan SS, Teh BJ, et al. : Proteolytic Potential of the MSC Exosome Proteome: Implications for an Exosome-Mediated Delivery of Therapeutic Proteasome. Int J Proteomics. 2012;2012:1–14. 10.1155/2012/971907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Hermans IF, Ritchie DS, Yang J, et al. : CD8+ T Cell-Dependent Elimination of Dendritic Cells in vivo Limits the Induction of Antitumor Immunity. J. Immunol. 2000;164(6):3095–3101. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.164.6.3095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Luketic L, Delanghe J, Sobol PT, et al. : Antigen Presentation by Exosomes Released from Peptide-Pulsed Dendritic Cells Is Not Suppressed by the Presence of Active CTL. J. Immunol. 2007;179(8):5024–5032. 10.4049/JIMMUNOL.179.8.5024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Aspe JR, Wall NR: Survivin-T34A: Molecular Mechanism and Therapeutic Potential. Onco. Targets. Ther. 2010;3:247–254. 10.2147/OTT.S15293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Jang SC, Kim OY, Yoon CM, et al. : Bioinspired Exosome-Mimetic Nanovesicles for Targeted Delivery of Chemotherapeutics to Malignant Tumors. ACS Nano. 2013;7(9):7698–7710. 10.1021/NN402232G/SUPPL_FILE/NN402232G_SI_001.PDF [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Liu L, Chang S, Sun J, et al. : Ultrasound-Mediated Destruction of Paclitaxel and Oxygen Loaded Lipid Microbubbles for Combination Therapy in Ovarian Cancer Xenografts. Cancer Lett. 2015;361(1):147–154. 10.1016/J.CANLET.2015.02.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Bakrania AK, Variya BC, Patel SS: Novel Targets for Paclitaxel Nano Formulations: Hopes and Hypes in Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2016;111:577–591. 10.1016/J.PHRS.2016.07.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Kim MS, Haney MJ, Zhao Y, et al. : Development of Exosome-Encapsulated Paclitaxel to Overcome MDR in Cancer Cells. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(3):655–664. 10.1016/J.NANO.2015.10.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Saari H, Lázaro-Ibáñez E, Viitala T, et al. : Microvesicle- and Exosome-Mediated Drug Delivery Enhances the Cytotoxicity of Paclitaxel in Autologous Prostate Cancer Cells. J. Control. Release. 2015;220(Pt B):727–737. 10.1016/J.JCONREL.2015.09.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Spector PE, Fox S, Penney LM, et al. : The Dimensionality of Counterproductivity: Are All Counterproductive Behaviors Created Equal?. J. Vocat. Behav. 2006;68(3):446–460. 10.1016/J.JVB.2005.10.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Upadhya R, Shetty AK: Extracellular Vesicles for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Aging Dis. 2021;12(6):1438–1450. 10.14336/AD.2021.0516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Yu H, Yang X, Xiao X, et al. : Human Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Protect Mice from DSS-Induced Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Promoting Intestinal-Stem-Cell and Epithelial Regeneration. Aging Dis. 2021;12(6):1423–1437. 10.14336/AD.2021.0601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Meng W, He C, Hao Y, et al. : Prospects and Challenges of Extracellular Vesicle-Based Drug Delivery System: Considering Cell Source. Drug Deliv. 2020;27(1):585–598. 10.1080/10717544.2020.1748758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Zhang X, Liu D, Gao Y, et al. : The Biology and Function of Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer Development. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:3192. 10.3389/FCELL.2021.777441/BIBTEX [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Hong EJ, Choi DG, Shim MS: Targeted and Effective Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer Using Functionalized Nanomaterials. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2016;6(4):297–307. 10.1016/J.APSB.2016.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Kawikova I, Askenase PW: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potentials of Exosomes in CNS Diseases. Brain Res. 2015;1617:63–71. 10.1016/J.BRAINRES.2014.09.070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Li X, Tsibouklis J, Weng T, et al. : Nano Carriers for Drug Transport across the Blood-Brain Barrier. J. Drug Target. 2017;25(1):17–28. 10.1080/1061186X.2016.1184272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2023 Oct 20. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.145092.r204580

Reviewer response for version 1

Charan Kishor Shetty 1

Bakkannavar and co-authors investigated the topic of Extracellular vesicles (EVs) as a novel drug delivery system to target cancer and other diseases. They specifically focused on the hypothesis that EVs are regarded as potent carriers of therapeutics that can be used as a therapeutic agent for diseases like cancer.

The authors have a very well-organized Introduction by elaborating biological functions of Extracellular vesicles, pathogenesis, and their role in cancer treatment. Moreover, they have described how EVs are derived from immune cells to suppress the growth of cancer cells, inhibition of cancer-derived EVs release, EVs as carriers of genes, and finally EVs as carriers of chemotherapeutic drugs and their use in treatment of other diseases. The article also gives us an insight into the challenges of EVs in drug delivery.

The manuscript is certainly well-written and attractive. Lastly, I think that this article conveys the message that EVs offer novel and important tools in cancer treatment.

It would be great if the authors could add any ongoing EV carrier drugs in use or under production.

Is the review written in accessible language?

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?

Yes

Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Forensic Pathology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

References

  • 1. : Exosome-mediated siRNA delivery to suppress postoperative breast cancer metastasis. J Control Release .2020;318: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.005 1-15 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2023 Sep 15. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.145092.r204660

Reviewer response for version 1

Raghavendra Babu Y P 1

The authors have delved on reviewing the literature with regards to EVs as a novel way of delivering drugs in cancer and other diseases.

The manuscript is lucidly written with wide range of issues related to EVs and their physiology, utility and probable ways to utilise them as drug delivery systems. The review gives factual information about EVs and delves throughly into the current topic of EVs.

Is the review written in accessible language?

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?

Yes

Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

i Have been involved in Forensic Medicine teaching since last 18 years

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    No data are associated with this article.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES