Skip to main content
NPJ Microgravity logoLink to NPJ Microgravity
. 2023 Oct 21;9:84. doi: 10.1038/s41526-023-00330-y

How do gravity alterations affect animal and human systems at a cellular/tissue level?

Francesca Cialdai 1,#, Austin M Brown 2,#, Cory W Baumann 3,#, Debora Angeloni 4, Sarah Baatout 5, Alexandra Benchoua 6, Juergen Bereiter-Hahn 7, Daniele Bottai 8, Judith-Irina Buchheim 9, Marco Calvaruso 10, Eugénie Carnero-Diaz 11, Sara Castiglioni 12, Duccio Cavalieri 13, Gabriele Ceccarelli 14, Alexander Choukér 9, Gianni Ciofani 15, Giuseppe Coppola 16, Gabriella Cusella 14, Andrea Degl’Innocenti 17,18, Jean-Francois Desaphy 19, Jean-Pol Frippiat 20, Michael Gelinsky 21, Giada Genchi 15, Maria Grano 19, Daniela Grimm 22,23, Alain Guignandon 24, Christiane Hahn 25, Jason Hatton 25, Raúl Herranz 26, Christine E Hellweg 27, Carlo Saverio Iorio 28, Thodoris Karapantsios 29, Jack van Loon 30, Matteo Lulli 31, Jeanette Maier 12, Jos Malda 32, Emina Mamaca 33, Lucia Morbidelli 34, Angelique van Ombergen 25, Andreas Osterman 35, Aleksandr Ovsianikov 36, Francesco Pampaloni 37, Elizabeth Pavezlorie 38, Veronica Pereda-Campos 39, Cyrille Przybyla 40, Christopher Puhl 41, Petra Rettberg 42, Chiara Risaliti 1, Angela Maria Rizzo 43, Kate Robson-Brown 44, Leonardo Rossi 45, Giorgio Russo 10, Alessandra Salvetti 45, Daniela Santucci 46, Matthias Sperl 47, Felice Strollo 48, Kevin Tabury 5, Sara Tavella 49, Christiane Thielemann 50, Ronnie Willaert 51, Nathaniel J Szewczyk 3, Monica Monici 1,
PMCID: PMC10590411  PMID: 37865644

Abstract

The present white paper concerns the indications and recommendations of the SciSpacE Science Community to make progress in filling the gaps of knowledge that prevent us from answering the question: “How Do Gravity Alterations Affect Animal and Human Systems at a Cellular/Tissue Level?” This is one of the five major scientific issues of the ESA roadmap “Biology in Space and Analogue Environments”. Despite the many studies conducted so far on spaceflight adaptation mechanisms and related pathophysiological alterations observed in astronauts, we are not yet able to elaborate a synthetic integrated model of the many changes occurring at different system and functional levels. Consequently, it is difficult to develop credible models for predicting long-term consequences of human adaptation to the space environment, as well as to implement medical support plans for long-term missions and a strategy for preventing the possible health risks due to prolonged exposure to spaceflight beyond the low Earth orbit (LEO). The research activities suggested by the scientific community have the aim to overcome these problems by striving to connect biological and physiological aspects in a more holistic view of space adaptation effects.

Subject terms: Medical research, Systems biology

Introduction

Several undesirable consequences of space flight have been described since the very beginning of space exploration, including: bone loss, muscle atrophy, immune response impairment, nervous system functional derangement, cardiovascular deconditioning, metabolic dysregulation, spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) etc.18.

All of these alterations represent models of chronic diseases commonly observed on Earth, mostly affecting the elderly, and potentially sharing the same pathophysiological mechanism(s), involving oxidative stress and vascular dysfunction through chronic inflammation914. In addition, stressful tasks and diet changes, confinement-related artificial light, isolation and reduced motor activity might worsen the effects of weightlessness by further contributing to musculoskeletal and cardiovascular deconditioning, dysregulation of energy metabolism and endocrine balance1421.

Despite the continuously increasing knowledge gathered on mechanisms underlying the multiple effects of space flight on astronauts, studies conducted so far have not been able to generate a synthetic integrated view of changes occurring at different system and functional levels. Therefore, it remains difficult to elaborate credible models predicting long-term consequences of human adaptation to the space environment, as well as, to plan the medical support and the necessary countermeasures for long-term missions.

Recent research progress points to new approaches to understand the inner mechanisms leading from health to the onset of pathological conditions. The ability to maintain/restore homeostasis is of critical importance to allow tissues to restore their functions and e.g. to heal from injuries and diseases allows the organism to survive. In contrast, persistence of altered homeostatic conditions and here the lack of e.g., efficient healing ability predispose to the onset of chronic diseases, accelerated aging, disability and death2225.

Most recent research suggests the importance to study the connections among oxidative stress, increased endotoxin levels, metabolic dysregulation (MetS), low grade inflammation and immune system changes, which in turn may be related to altered microbiome/virome expressions6,20,2637. A case study carried out on one subject engaged in a one-year mission has recently reported that alterations of the inflammatory, metabolic and immune profiles are among the more persistent alterations after return to Earth, with an early peak and a slow decreasing trend thereafter without coming back to pre-flight levels for months28. In other studies, a stress related shift toward inflammageing has been observed in cosmonauts after long-duration spaceflight38. Therefore, the microbiome-immune profile-inflammation-metabolism (including mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress) seems to play a central role in adaptation mechanisms to spaceflight.

Key knowledge gaps

To plan long-lasting deep space missions, the effects of altered gravity on animal and human systems (in particular the immune, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, neurosensory, neuroendocrine, excretory, respiratory, metabolic and integumentary systems) should be further explored, focusing on molecular/cellular and cell-communication processes. These effects should be framed in the more general context of systemic adaptation to the space environment and contemporary alterations in different organs and functions, which can be induced also by factors different from altered gravity (e.g. radiation, isolation, confinement, celestial dust)18,39,40.

Efforts should be made to untangle the confounding effects of multiple stressors in the space environment (the space exposome), and differentiate the effects of space-related stressors (altered gravity and cosmic rays from the effects of confinement, isolation and psychophysical stress). In order to provide appropriate countermeasures, it is extremely important to clarify the causes and contributing factors of the various possible alterations.

It is mandatory to study the evolution of fundamental physiological processes of adaptation, crucial for organism’s survival, (e.g. hemorrhage and blood coagulation, acute and chronic inflammation, stromal activation, tissue repair mechanisms, metabolic pathways) in altered gravity, in order to predict long-term alterations and implement countermeasures. In fact, long-duration space exploration missions might reduce the organism’s ability to respond to acute injuries/infections and predispose astronauts to the onset of chronic diseases (e.g. cardiovascular and metabolic diseases) and premature aging by strongly influencing redox and metabolic processes, microbiota, immune function, as well as, endotoxin and pro-inflammatory signal production6,21,28,3135,37,4144. Indeed, it is known that low grade chronic inflammation (LGI) involves many of the above mechanisms and is a distinctive feature of major chronic diseases in the aging population4547.

Moreover, we need to know the long-term consequences of the above effects. In other words, we need to know if and how changes in the crucial biological processes mentioned above can increase the risk of acute and chronic disease onset and/or influence disease progression.

In summary, we need to gain knowledge about the effects of space stressors on the onset and evolution of serious diseases.

It is also important to unravel the role of gravity in wound and trauma healing, tissue regeneration, remodelling and development. In all these processes mechanical factors play important, but still not completely known, roles. Due to unloading conditions, the space environment is particularly suitable for these studies48.

A better understanding of the scientific problems described above, could not only help manage a number of diseases both in space and on Earth, but it should also enable crew members to be better fitted to return to a gravity environment like on Earth or when arriving on Mars.

Last but not least, cancer is caused by an accumulation of genetic mutations49. Its onset and progression also depend on alterations of the microenvironment50,51. Cancer onset could be caused by chronic exposure to environmental stressors as encountered during long-term space missions52. Identifying mechanisms of cancer development and progression during spaceflights is crucial. Since the impairment of immune system activity plays an important role in cancer progression, and a healthy immune system can counteract tumor growth53, it would be interesting to elucidate how altered gravity may affect the existing balance between immunity and immune escape mechanisms in cancer. Moreover, the role played by the cancer microenvironment, namely the stromal components and the extracellular matrix, should be further investigated.

The development of countermeasures for the different space stressors is a fundamental aspect in the preparation of future space exploration missions. Before application, identified countermeasures must be tested and validated to know their effectiveness and possible side effects when applied during spaceflight or in suitable space analogs.

When physical countermeasures (exercise, physical therapies) are considered, investigations on the mechanisms underlying their therapeutic effects carried out in unloading conditions will be very important to elucidate any difference in comparison with their application in loading conditions54.

Drug treatments are also included among the countermeasures to prevent or counteract the effects induced by spaceflight. However, due to the pathophysiological adaptation occurring during spaceflight, the absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of drugs is expected to be different in space. The recent episode on the ISS in which the administration of anticoagulants became necessary to treat a case of asymptomatic venous thrombosis (VT) of the internal jugular vein of an astronaut, further highlights the importance of studying the pharmacodynamics/kinetics of drugs in space55. Therefore, assessing gravity-induced changes in the pharmacodynamics/kinetics of drugs is certainly a topic that requires many research efforts56.

Proposed research activities

Summarizing what has been reported in the previous paragraph, five main scientific questions that are partially/totally unanswered have been identified (Fig. 1):

  1. What are the effects of altered gravity on key biological systems such as the immune, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, neurosensory, neuroendocrine, excretory, respiratory, and integumentary systems as well as on their metabolism and homeostasis?

  2. What are the effects of altered gravity on tissue regeneration and development as well as on tissue engineering technologies?

  3. What are the effects of altered gravity on the development and progression of diseases (e.g., cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, autoimmune diseases and allergies, cancer, genetic predisposition).

  4. What is the effectiveness of countermeasures (e.g., physical countermeasures, nutrition, pharmaceuticals, nanoparticles and nanomaterials, other therapeutics) and what are the possible side effects when the countermeasures are applied during spaceflight?

  5. What are the changes in pharmacodynamics/kinetics of drugs when these are used by crew members during spaceflight?

Fig. 1. How to fill knowledge gaps.

Fig. 1

Main issues regarding how gravity alterations affect animal and human systems at a cellular/tissue level.

To answer these questions, a corresponding number of research lines should be implemented, with activities including both on ground and in-flight experiments, using all the available platforms and spanning from short to long timeline.

In more detail, the first research line should concern in-depth studies on effects of long-term exposure to spaceflight in order to understand basic processes in life sciences, and being able to support plans for long-duration and exploration missions (moon, Mars).

Studies should be designed with a dual purpose: i) on one side, evaluating the sum of multiple effects due to contemporary exposure to altered gravity, radiation, isolation, confinement, and psychophysical stress, which result in contemporary alterations in different organs and functions. ii) on the other side, trying to untangle the confounding effects of multiple stressors of the space exposome and to define the causes and contributing causes triggering different biological responses to help uncover the reasons and sequences of (mal)adaptations to space and place them in the context of human evolution. Moreover, a better understanding of the relationships between causes and effects is of crucial importance to implement effective countermeasures.

Indeed, basic research and human subjects´ research experiments should be bridged in the effort to connect biology, physiology and evolutionary anthropology, obtaining a more holistic approach to the process of human adaptation to space. Furthermore, the role of sex/gender in the biological response to spaceflight should be investigated more thoroughly.

Studies involving animal models can help explore the role of gravity with respect to spaceflight-related phenomena, like accelerated ageing, metabolic disorders or more social and behavioral-related phenomena. Animal models could also be applied to develop and test long duration Space Exploration related countermeasures such as in-flight artificial gravity, hibernation related protocols, nanotechnology, physical therapies, drugs, and probiotics. Small animal models (vertebrates like mice, fish, amphibians, other rodents or invertebrates like fruit flies, planarians, C. elegans, leeches and rotifers) could be of particular interest to study processes, functions and morphologies that have been conserved throughout evolution.

To heighten studies with animal models, in particular with rodents, access of European scientists to rodent research opportunities should be entertained either via collaboration with ISS partners for use of their facilities and/or via a close collaboration and use of the Italian Mouse Drawer System (MDS). Furthermore, when organizing animal/rodent studies both in-flight (altered gravity) or on the ground (unloading conditions, 1 g and hyper-g) a comprehensive tissue sharing program should be implemented.

Whichever model is used, it is recommended to consider the following key points when designing the experiments:

  1. The spaceflight exposure time, namely the duration of the experiments, should be increased, even to the length of the life cycle of the organism chosen as a model. An extended time exposure helps understand the risks associated to long duration missions;

  2. Higher statistical significance and reproducibility are needed to obtain “more quantitative” results. Therefore, the number of samples/subjects involved in the experiments should increase.

  3. Real time analysis and monitoring is important to avoid bias due to the return to Earth of the samples. Therefore, the development of suitable devices is needed;

  4. A highly integrated approach should be anticipated to make optimal use of the animal models (e.g. with elaborate Tissue Sharing Program).

A second research line should be addressed to explore and monitor the role of gravity (and the consequences of its alteration) in fundamental biological processes, such as growth and development, differentiation and organ morphogenesis, wound healing, tissue regeneration and restoration of homeostasis. Since the fine regulation of these processes is crucial for the development of organisms, their reaction to injuries and survival, a better knowledge of these topics in space environment is essential in view of future interplanetary missions, which will require long stay of crew members in space. In this perspective, research activities aimed at investigating the impact of spaceflight on reproduction, embryonic development, and multi-generational exposure should be increasingly carried out. Furthermore, the role of nutrition in growth, development, and response to injuries during spaceflight should be examined.

Beyond the investigation on embryogenesis in the space environment, research should be extended to other 3/4D biological processes, such as the growth and maturation of tissue constructs. Biotechnologies focused on tissue regeneration and engineering, not only have been indicated as enabling technologies for interplanetary missions, but they could also play a crucial role in coping with serious diseases on Earth. In this perspective, the identification of key omics-signatures for potential therapeutic applications both on Earth and long-term spaceflights would be extremely important.

One of the most important problems in programming crewed exploration missions beyond LEO is the increase in health risks due to prolonged exposure to radiation and microgravity. The condition of isolation and confinement and the prolonged psychophysical stress worsen the overall picture. Therefore, it is mandatory to implement a third line of research focused on the on-set, development and progression of serious acute and chronic diseases possibly induced by spaceflight. The identification of key omics-signatures of cancer and other diseases, such as metabolic and cardiovascular pathologies could be very important for their prevention and treatment.

It is well known that the cell microenvironment has a crucial role in cancer evolution, while experiments carried out in real and modeled microgravity demonstrated that extracellular matrix (ECM) properties can change in unloading conditions. Therefore, the cancer-associated microenvironment should be carefully studied in space. As regards the mechanisms underlying metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, studies should focus on low grade inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction, which often characterize these kind of diseases.

A fourth line of research should focus efforts on the development of countermeasures enabling, from a biomedical point of view, future interplanetary missions. Protective (preventative) and therapeutic strategies based on both pharmacological and physical therapies should be implemented. The mechanisms of action of the countermeasures must be studied in the space environment, or by using facilities that model the space exposome, because differences are expected in comparison to what has been observed on Earth. Studies to elucidate the mechanisms of action of the countermeasures, evaluate their effectiveness, and to validate them, might be conducted using 2D and 3D in vitro models, ex vivo tissue models, and animal models, and then combined with studies on human subjects in space to confirm the results obtained with the models. Also, research on drug vectors (including nanomaterials) for medical applications in space is needed.

An important aspect to consider when specifically evaluating pharmacological treatments for use during spaceflight, is related to possible changes in drug pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics due to changes in human physiology induced by space adaptation mechanisms. Indeed, these changes could induce differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of drugs. Studies carried out in rodents have reported that microgravity induces alterations in liver metabolism, causing a pathophysiological state similar to fatty liver disease, a condition that can affect the processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs57,58. Therefore, a fifth research line should be specifically aimed at: i) evaluating the effectiveness of drugs in spaceflight conditions; ii) investigating the possible changes induced by the space environment in the action mechanisms of drugs and possible adverse reactions; iii) defining treatment protocols and dosages for use during spaceflight. Studies in spaceflight conditions should be systematically compared to suitable ground-controls in order to estimate the impact of spaceflight conditions on drug effects, drug metabolism, side effects, drug toxicity and adverse reactions.

The most relevant knowledge gaps and activities are reported in Table 1.

Table 1.

Recommendations in short (3 years), middle (6 years) and long term (> 10 years).

Open fundamental scientific questions Proposed Research Activities including ground & space experiments Suitable testbed environment (Ground, LEO, BLEO, Moon, Mars,) Space relevance (importance of altered gravity and/or relevance for space exploration) Timeline

1: Assessing the effect of altered gravity on key biological systems such as the immune, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, neurosensory, endocrine, excretory, respiratory and integumentary systems, their metabolism and homeostasis.

It is also important to investigate the effect of gravitational alterations on functions and processes of outmost importance, as well as their pathological implications, such as coagulation, acute and chronic inflammation, antibody affinity maturation and its genetic machinery, stromal function and activation, metabolic pathways, temperature and its control.

Studying the long-term consequences of the above effects (risk of development and progression of acute and chronic diseases)

Studying the effects of long-term exposure to spaceflight, in order to understand basic processes in life sciences and being able to support plan long-duration and exploration missions (Moon, Mars).

Evaluating the sum of multiple effects due to the contemporary exposure to altered gravity, radiation, isolation, confinement and psychophysical stress, which result in contemporary alterations in different organs and functions.

Connecting biology, physiology and evolutionary anthropology: a more holistic approach, human scoped experiments but also basic research studies are needed to help uncover causes of (mal)adaptations to space, placed in the context of human evolution.

By using small animal models (vertebrates like mice, fish, amphibians, other rodents or invertebrates like fruit flies, planarians, C. elegans, leeches) study processes, functions and morphologies that are conserved throughout evolution.

Animal models should be applied to explore the role of gravity or the lack thereof with respect to spaceflight related phenomena like increased ageing, metabolic disorders or more social and behavioral related phenomena. Such animal models could also be applied to develop long duration Space Exploration related countermeasure such as in-flight artificial gravity, hibernation related protocols, nanotechnology, physical therapies, drugs and probiotics.

Access of European scientists as Project Coordinator for rodent research opportunities should be entertained either via collaboration with ISS partners for use of their facilities and/or via a close collaboration and use of the Italian Mouse Drawer System (MDS).

For animal / rodent studies both in-flight (altered gravity) or ground based (unloading conditions, 1 g and hyper-g) a comprehensive tissue sharing program should be implemented.

For all models:

a) The spaceflight exposure time, that is the duration of the experiments involving the above models, should be increased, even to the length of the life cycle of the organism.

b) Higher statistical significance and reproducibility are needed to obtain “more quantitative” results.

c) Real time analysis and monitoring are important to avoid bias due to the return to Earth of the samples.

d) A highly integrated approach should be anticipated to make optimal use of the animals (e.g. with elaborate Tissue Sharing Program).

Investigating the role of sex/gender on the biological response to spaceflight.

Examining whether the biological response to spaceflight is “spaceflight” vs. the built environment (e.g. altered gravity/radiation vs. hardware/closed system).

Ground-based (micro- and partial gravity simulation and hypergravity)

in vitro and ex vivo models in/beyond LEO

Animal models in LEO

Animal models beyond LEO

Humans in LEO

Humans beyond LEO

Use of spaceflight environment for basic and applied research:

Extended microgravity to permit the effect of sub g accelerations to be explored

Ground based studies can explore response in microgravity analogue or hypergravity and gravity transitions

Space Exploration relevance:

Understanding the effect of spaceflight on medically relevant cells, tissues and organ systems and the development of countermeasures.

Animal models enable research that is not possible with cellular systems or human subjects

Short Medium
2. Assessing the effect of altered gravity on tissue regeneration and development

Investigating and monitoring the fundamental processes of organ morphogenesis, regeneration, differentiation, and homeostasis under altered gravity.

Identify key omics-signatures for potential therapeutic application on Earth and long-term spaceflights.

Examine the impact of spaceflight on reproduction and multi-generational exposure.

Examine the impact of spaceflight on embryonic development and other 3/4D biological processes.

Examine the role of nutrition in the biological response to spaceflight.

Ground (micro- and partial gravity simulation and hypergravity).

in vitro and ex vivo models in/beyond LEO

Animal models in LEO

Animal Models beyond LEO

Humans in LEO

Humans beyond LEO

Use of the spaceflight environment for basic and applied research:

Increase understanding of how decreased mechanical load can impact tissue regeneration.

Space Exploration relevance:

Understanding the effect of spaceflight on medically relevant biological processes and the development of countermeasures.

Medium
3. Assessing the effect of altered gravity on disease development and progression

Identify key omics-signatures of cancer and other diseases’ development and progression.

Analysis of changes in the cancer-associated microenvironment.

Analysis of the role of age in the response to spaceflight-induced changes.

Understanding thrombosis development and resolution.

Ground

in vitro and ex vivo models in/beyond LEO

Animal models in LEO

Animal Models beyond LEO

Humans in LEO

Humans beyond LEO

Use of the spaceflight environment for basic and applied research:

Increased understanding of how decreased mechanical load impacts disease onset and progression.

Increase understanding of how spaceflight impacts disease onset and progression to better inform health risks for participants.

Space Exploration relevance:

Understanding the effects of spaceflight on medically relevant biological processes, risk assessment and the development of countermeasures.

Medium
4. Assessing the effect of countermeasures

Identification of adequate countermeasures, including physical countermeasures.

Evaluation and validation of these countermeasures on in vitro 3D models, ex vivo tissue models and in vivo animal models in space is needed to confirm the protective or therapeutic effect, combined with studies on human subjects in space to confirm the results obtained with models.

Using the above models, identify the most suitable drug candidates and/or vectors (including nanomaterials) for medical applications in space, as protective or therapeutic countermeasures against different space stressors (radiation, altered gravity, confinement, etc.).

Ground-based (micro- and partial gravity simulation and hyper- gravity)

in vitro and in vivo models in/beyond LEO

Animal models in LEO

Animal models beyond LEO

Humans in LEO

Humans beyond LEO

Use of the spaceflight environment for basic and applied research:

Evaluation of novel therapeutics for spaceflight.

Space Exploration relevance:

Understanding the effects of spaceflight on medically relevant biological processes, risk assessment and the development of countermeasures.

Medium

5. Assessing gravity-induced changes in the pharmacodynamics/kinetics of drug treatments.

The mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of physical therapies should also be investigated in unloading conditions to elucidate any difference in comparison with loading conditions.

Confirm that they are still active under spaceflight conditions and maintain their therapeutic and health properties.

Identify the factors and extent to which gravity may affect the active properties of the drug treatments.

Identify possible changes to the adverse drug reaction profile of drug treatments.

Conduct health tests on in vitro 3D models, ex vivo tissue models and in vivo animal models in space (and/or isolation, confinement) to confirm the protective or therapeutic effect. The results should be systematically compared to suitable ground-controls in order to estimate the impact of spaceflight conditions, combined with studies on human subjects in space to confirm the results obtained with models.

Ground-based (micro- and partial gravity simulation and hyper- gravity)

in vitro and in vivo models in/beyond LEO

Animal models in LEO

Animal models beyond LEO

Humans in LEO

Humans beyond LEO

Use of the spaceflight environment for basic and applied research:

Increase understanding of the impact of altered spaceflight physiology on pharmacodynamics.

Increase understanding of the impact of spaceflight on drug shelf-life and kinetics.

Space Exploration relevance:

Understanding the effects of spaceflight on medically relevant biological processes, risk assessment and the development of countermeasures.

Medium Long

On-ground research activities require the use of microgravity analogs and microgravity simulators. Ground-based microgravity analogs include long-duration bed-rest and water immersion. The ground-based microgravity simulators include the following: clinostat, random positioning machine (RPM), rotating wall vessel (RWV) or Rotary Cell Culture System (RCCS) and Magnetic Levitation (ML)59. While microgravity analogs replicate some microgravity-induced physiological responses, microgravity simulators are platforms that can be used to model the exposure of cells, biological tissue samples and small animal models to microgravity conditions. Since conducting experiments in space is not always a viable option, ground-based microgravity analogs and simulators are widely used in space biology/physiology studies. Moreover, also on ground analogues such as submarines and Concordia Station in Antarctica are used to study the effects of isolation and confinement on human physiology. Thus, it is necessary to use these facilities coherently and to be careful when comparing results obtained by using different platforms60.

Priorities for the ESA space programme (altered gravity and/or Exploration relevance)

The results of the above research activities will contribute to understand the mechanisms underlying temporary functional alterations in the human organism during spaceflight, their causes, recovery timelines and effects possibly leading to health risks and a progression towards chronic diseases.

The results will contribute to implementing preventative and therapeutic countermeasures as well as diagnostic tools to monitor astronauts’ health, manage health risks and supply effective therapies and health care facilities in future long-lasting space exploration missions. With these results, novel and original therapeutic solutions for spaceflight could also be found.

It is very important to highlight that these studies also offer the possibility of investigating topics of basic and applied research. The extended microgravity exposure will allow to explore the effect of sub g accelerations and make a comparison with the response in microgravity analogue or hypergravity and gravity transitions explored by ground-based studies. Moreover, it will be possible to increase the understanding of the impact of spaceflight on drug shelf-life and kinetics and to evaluate the effect of spaceflight-induced physiological alterations on pharmacodynamics.

The space environment offers a unique opportunity to study the role of gravity and mechanical factors on biological processes. By carrying out these studies, a better understanding of how decreased mechanical load can impact fundamental processes as tissue regeneration or disease onset and progression, could be reached. The perspectives of human exploration of the moon and Mars will need to further expand the knowledge on G-level transitions and especially the effects of life under at 1/6 or 1/3 of Earth gravity.

Benefit for earth and industrial relevance

As above reported, many pathophysiological changes observed during and after spaceflight can represent models of a series of chronic diseases commonly observed on Earth, mostly affecting the elderly and frail subjects. The possibility to conduct studies on pathophysiological alterations in healthy and well-characterized subjects in space can shed new light on the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying chronic diseases, help to find therapeutic targets and implement effective countermeasures to prevent the onset of these diseases or slow their progression, and, potentially increase our understanding of the molecular basis of frailty.

Conclusions

In conclusion, for planning future manned interplanetary missions, it is necessary to expand our knowledge about the effects induced in human and animal organisms by the different stressors of the space exposome, namely microgravity, radiation, confinement, isolation and psychophysical stress. It is also required to have a greater awareness of the long-term consequences that could occur at a systemic level due to the multiple and concomitant alterations due to adaptation to spaceflight. Efforts should be made to progress in the implementation of effective countermeasures to monitor astronaut’s health as well as to prevent and treat diseases occurring during spaceflight. The application of advanced technologies (nanotechnologies, 3D printing, tissue engineering and regeneration, etc.) has a crucial role in the implementation of the research programs recommended in the roadmap.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary (66.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This manuscript has been written in the frame of the activities for the preparation and dissemination of the ESA-ROADMAPS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH which define strategic goals for future space research on the ISS and supporting research platforms.

Author contributions

Author Contributions: Conceptualization, M.M. and N.J.S.; writing, F.C., A.M.B., C.W.B., N.J.S., and M.M.; writing review and editing, F.C., A.M.B., C.W.B., M.M., and N.J.S.; supervision, M.M., N.J.S, C.H., J.H., Av.O. and C.P. The other authors contributed to writing the SSCWP. F.C., A.M.B., and C.W.B. are co-first authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Francesca Cialdai, Austin M. Brown, Cory W. Baumann.

These authors jointly supervised this work: Nathaniel J. Szewczyk, Monica Monici.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41526-023-00330-y.

References

  • 1.Rea G, et al. Microgravity-driven remodeling of the proteome reveals insights into molecular mechanisms and signal networks involved in response to the space flight environment. J. Proteom. 2016;137:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davis CM, Allen AR, Bowles DE. Consequences of space radiation on the brain and cardiovascular system. J. Environ. Sci. Health C. Toxicol. Carcinog. 2021;39:180–218. doi: 10.1080/26896583.2021.1891825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Holick MF. Perspective on the consequences of short- and long-duration space flight on human physiology. Life Support Biosph. Sci. 1999;6:19–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Strollo F. Hormonal changes in humans during spaceflight. Adv. Space Biol. Med. 1999;7:99–129. doi: 10.1016/s1569-2574(08)60008-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Demontis GC, et al. Human Pathophysiological Adaptations to the Space Environment. Front. Physiol. 2017;8:547. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Strollo F, Gentile S, Strollo G, Mambro A, Vernikos J. Recent Progress in Space Physiology and Aging. Front. Physiol. 2018;9:1551. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lane HW, Smith SM. Physiological adaptations to space flight. Life support Biosph. Sci. 1999;6:13–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee AG, et al. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS) and the neuro-ophthalmologic effects of microgravity: a review and an update. NPJ Microgravity. 2020;6:7. doi: 10.1038/s41526-020-0097-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ferrucci L, Fabbri E. Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2018;15:505–522. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0064-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.el Assar M, Angulo J, Rodríguez-Mañas L. Oxidative stress and vascular inflammation in aging. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013;65:380–401. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mancuso P. The role of adipokines in chronic inflammation. Immunotargets Ther. 2016;5:47–56. doi: 10.2147/ITT.S73223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nishida K, Otsu K. Inflammation and metabolic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc. Res. 2017;113:389–398. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvx012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mao XW, et al. Impact of Spaceflight and Artificial Gravity on the Mouse Retina: Biochemical and Proteomic Analysis. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:2546. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Strollo F. Adaptation of the human endocrine system to microgravity in the context of integrative physiology and ageing. Pflug. Arch. 2000;441:R85–R90. doi: 10.1007/s004240000331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Leach CS, Altchuler SI, Cintron-Trevino NM. The endocrine and metabolic responses to space flight. Med Sci. Sports Exerc. 1983;15:432–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hargens AR, Richardson S. Cardiovascular adaptations, fluid shifts, and countermeasures related to space flight. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2009;169:S30–S33. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2009.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ferrando AA, Paddon-Jones D, Wolfe RR. Alterations in protein metabolism during space flight and inactivity. Nutrition. 2002;18:837–841. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(02)00930-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pagel JI, Choukèr A. Effects of isolation and confinement on humans-implications for manned space explorations. J. Appl Physiol. (1985) 2016;120:1449–1457. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00928.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heer M, Elia M, Ritz P. Energy and fluid metabolism in microgravity. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2001;4:307–311. doi: 10.1097/00075197-200107000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Strollo F, et al. Changes in stress hormones and metabolism during a 105-day simulated Mars mission. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2014;85:793–797. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.3907.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Strollo F, et al. Body composition and metabolic changes during a 520-day mission simulation to Mars. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2018;41:1267–1273. doi: 10.1007/s40618-018-0861-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bektas A, Schurman SH, Sen R, Ferrucci L. Aging, inflammation and the environment. Exp. Gerontol. 2018;105:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tacke F, Luedde T, Trautwein C. Inflammatory Pathways in Liver Homeostasis and Liver Injury. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2009;36:4–12. doi: 10.1007/s12016-008-8091-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kulkarni OP, Lichtnekert J, Anders H-J, Mulay SR. The Immune System in Tissue Environments Regaining Homeostasis after Injury: Is “Inflammation” Always Inflammation? Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2016/2856213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cialdai F, et al. Effect of Unloading Condition on the Healing Process and Effectiveness of Platelet Rich Plasma as a Countermeasure: Study on In Vivo and In Vitro Wound Healing Models. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:407. doi: 10.3390/ijms21020407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Merrill AH, et al. Differences in glycogen, lipids, and enzymes in livers from rats flown on COSMOS 2044. J. Appl Physiol. 1992;73:S142–S147. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1992.73.2.S142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yang J-Q, et al. The effects of microgravity on the digestive system and the new insights it brings to the life sciences. Life Sci. Space Res. (Amst.) 2020;27:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2020.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garrett-Bakelman, F. E. et al. The NASA Twins Study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight. Science364, (2019). 10.1126/science.aau8650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Voorhies AA, et al. Study of the impact of long-duration space missions at the International Space Station on the astronaut microbiome. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:9911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46303-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Siddiqui R, Akbar N, Khan NA. Gut microbiome and human health under the space environment. J. Appl Microbiol. 2021;130:14–24. doi: 10.1111/jam.14789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tobin BW, Uchakin PN, Leeper-Woodford SK. Insulin secretion and sensitivity in space flight: diabetogenic effects. Nutrition. 2002;18:842–848. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(02)00940-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hughson RL, et al. Increased postflight carotid artery stiffness and inflight insulin resistance resulting from 6-mo spaceflight in male and female astronauts. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2016;310:H628–H638. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00802.2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pierson DL, Stowe RP, Phillips TM, Lugg DJ, Mehta SK. Epstein-Barr virus shedding by astronauts during space flight. Brain Behav. Immun. 2005;19:235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2004.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stowe RP, Kozlova EV, Sams CF, Pierson DL, Walling DM. Latent and lytic Epstein-Barr virus gene expression in the peripheral blood of astronauts. J. Med Virol. 2011;83:1071–1077. doi: 10.1002/jmv.22079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sugita T, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the skin fungal microbiota of astronauts during a half-year stay at the International Space Station. Med Mycol. 2016;54:232–239. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rooney BV, Crucian BE, Pierson DL, Laudenslager ML, Mehta SK. Herpes Virus Reactivation in Astronauts During Spaceflight and Its Application on Earth. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:16. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Buchheim JI, et al. Stress related shift toward inflammaging in cosmonauts after long-duration space flight. Front. Physiol. 2019;10:85. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Witze, A. Astronaut twin study hints at stress of space travel. Nature10.1038/nature.2017.21380. (2017).
  • 39.Shearer WT, Zhang S, Reuben JM, Lee B-N, Butel JS. Effects of radiation and latent virus on immune responses in a space flight model. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005;115:1297–1303. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kothiyal P, et al. A multi-omics longitudinal study of the murine retinal response to chronic low-dose irradiation and simulated microgravity. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:16825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19360-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sarkar R, Pampaloni F. In Vitro Models of Bone Marrow Remodelling and Immune Dysfunction in Space: Present State and Future Directions. Biomedicines. 2022;10:766. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10040766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Crucian BE, et al. Immune System Dysregulation During Spaceflight: Potential Countermeasures for Deep Space Exploration Missions. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1437. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Biolo G, Heer M, Narici M, Strollo F. Microgravity as a model of ageing. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2003;6:31–40. doi: 10.1097/00075197-200301000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vernikos J, Schneider VS. Space, gravity and the physiology of aging: Parallel or Convergent Disciplines? A Mini-Review. Gerontology. 2010;56:157–166. doi: 10.1159/000252852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Arnoriaga-Rodríguez M, Fernández-Real JM. Microbiota impacts on chronic inflammation and metabolic syndrome - related cognitive dysfunction. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2019;20:473–480. doi: 10.1007/s11154-019-09537-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Soysal P, Arik F, Smith L, Jackson SE, Isik AT. Inflammation, Frailty and Cardiovascular Disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020;1216:55–64. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33330-0_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Capri M, et al. Long-term human spaceflight and inflammaging: does it promote aging? Ageing Res. Rev. 2023;87:101909. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2023.101909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cialdai F, Risaliti C, Monici M. Role of fibroblasts in wound healing and tissue remodeling on Earth and in space. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022;10:958381. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.958381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Martincorena I, Campbell PJ. Somatic mutation in cancer and normal cells. Science. 2015;349:1483–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aab4082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang X. Interactions between cancer cells and bone microenvironment promote bone metastasis in prostate cancer. Cancer Commun. (Lond.). 2019;39:76. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0425-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ren B, et al. Tumor microenvironment participates in metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2018;17:108. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0858-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Johnson IRD, Nguyen CT, Wise P, Grimm D. Implications of Altered Endosome and Lysosome Biology in Space Environments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8205. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wei H-C. Mathematical modeling of tumor growth: the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2019;16:6512–6535. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Monici M, et al. Effect of IR Laser on Myoblasts: Prospects of Application for Counteracting Microgravity-Induced Muscle Atrophy. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 2013;25:35–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Auñón-Chancellor SM, et al. Venous Thrombosis during Spaceflight. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:89–90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1905875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dello Russo C, et al. Physiological adaptations affecting drug pharmacokinetics in space: what do we really know? A critical review of the literature. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2022;179:2538–2557. doi: 10.1111/bph.15822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Beheshti A, et al. Multi-omics analysis of multiple missions to space reveal a theme of lipid dysregulation in mouse liver. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:19195. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55869-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Jonscher KR, et al. Spaceflight Activates Lipotoxic Pathways in Mouse Liver. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Herranz R, et al. Ground-based facilities for simulation of microgravity: organism-specific recommendations for their use, and recommended terminology. Astrobiol. Jan. 2013;13:1–17. doi: 10.1089/ast.2012.0876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Oluwafemi FA, Neduncheran A. Analog and simulated microgravity platforms for life sciences research: Their individual capacities, benefits and limitations. Adv. Space Res. 2022;69:2921–2929. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reporting Summary (66.1KB, pdf)

Articles from NPJ Microgravity are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES