Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2023 Sep 29;17(9):e0011544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011544

Gestational toxoplasmosis treatment changes the child’s prognosis: A cohort study in southern Brazil

Ana Gabriela Gomes Ferrari Strang 1,2,*, Rafaela Gomes Ferrar 3, Ana Lúcia Falavigna-Guilherme 4
Editor: Hamed Kalani5
PMCID: PMC10593203  PMID: 37773943

Abstract

Background

We evaluate the drug treatment for pregnant women with acute toxoplasmosis to reduce the risk of congenital infection, side effects (prenatal and postnatal treatment in children) and the hazard of discontinuing the infant’s medication.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the risks of congenital toxoplasmosis among children born to acutely infected women with and without treatment. We examined the relationship between "exposed" and "infected children", "number of infant neutrophils", "prenatal" and "postnatal treatment". Factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD) was used to analyze the data. All children started treatment at the hospital.

Findings

Between 2017 and 2021, 233 pregnant women were evaluated at the University Hospital of Maringá; ninety-four met criteria for acute gestational toxoplasmosis. We followed up 61 children; eleven (18%) had the infection confirmed and 50 (82%) were free of toxoplasmosis (exposed). Children born to untreated mothers have 6.5-times higher risk of being infected; the transmission rate among untreated mothers was 50% versus 8.3% among treated ones. Three decreasing values of immunoglobulin G were a security parameter for stopping the child’s medication in the exposed group (50/61). Neutropenia was the leading side effect among children and the infected had a 2.7 times higher risk. There was no correlation between maternal use of pyrimethamine and children’s neutropenia.

Interpretation

The follow-up of women with acute T. gondii infection and their children, through a multidisciplinary team, availability of anti-T. gondii serology and pre- and post-natal treatments reduced the risk of toxoplasmosis transmission.

Author summary

South America is the region with the highest burden of congenital toxoplasmosis and with the most pathogenic genotypes. Brazil is considered a country with a high prevalence of toxoplasmosis and a hotspot for outbreaks. The outcome of congenital transmission is influenced by factors such as T. gondii genotype, strain virulence, maternal immune status, maternal parasitemia, gestational age at the time of infection, and prenatal treatment. The last point mentioned is still controversial and raises several concerns, such as the financial impact of the monitoring and treatment of pregnant women and their children, the side effects of the medications used, and the benefit of investing in public health policies to mitigate toxoplasmosis. Information on the effectiveness of prenatal treatment is limited since it is challenging to carry out randomized studies. In the present manuscript, we evaluated the benefit of drug treatment for pregnant women with acute toxoplasmosis as a protective factor in reducing the risk of congenital infection. Also, we evaluated the side effects of prenatal and postnatal drug use in children and assessed the risk of discontinuing the medication in infants. We used the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) to report this study.

1. Introduction

Toxoplasmosis is a zoonosis caused by the intracellular protozoan Toxoplasma gondii, belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa. This pathogen is the most successful parasite; it has a worldwide distribution, can infect all warm-blooded animals and affects one-third of the human population [1].

The infection is often asymptomatic and the transmission is mainly foodborne and waterborne [2]. The primary vehicles are raw or undercooked meat with tissue cysts and water, raw vegetables and fruits with sporulated oocysts [3,4]. Additionally, in some cases of acute maternal infection, vertical transmission through the placenta to the fetus can be caused by T. gondii tachyzoites [5]. Congenital toxoplasmosis (CT) may lead to miscarriage, stillbirth, or sequelae in the child, such as retinochoroiditis and central nervous system lesions (i.e., cerebral calcification, hydrocephalus, mental retardation, epilepsy or psychiatric disease); however, the majority of congenitally-infected children appear asymptomatic at birth [6,7]. The outcome of congenital transmission is influenced by factors such as T. gondii genotype, strain virulence, maternal immune status, maternal parasitemia, gestational age at the time of infection and prenatal treatment. In Brazilian studies that identified the strain of T. gondii in children with congenital toxoplasmosis, it was possible to isolate fifteen different genotypes—#11 (BrII), #8 (BrIII), and the atypical #36, #41, #67, #108, #162, #166, #206, #207, #208, #209, #210, #211, #212 [6].#36, #41, #67, #108, #162, #166, #206, #207, #208, #209, #210, #211, #212 [6].

The risk of vertical transmission increases with the evolution of pregnancy: less than 10% before 12 weeks, 15–20% at 13–20 weeks, 44% at 26 weeks and 71% at 36 weeks [8,9].

The size of the problem and the consequences of congenital CT

The estimated global incidence of CT is 190,100 annual cases; this corresponds to an incidence rate of approximately 1.5 cases in 1,000 live births [10]. In Brazil, the reported prevalence ranges from 0.1 cases to 3.4/1,000 live births and studies have estimated that approximately 35% of children had neurological diseases including hydrocephalus, microcephaly and mental retardation, 80% had ocular lesions and one report mentioned 40% of children with hearing loss [6,11].

Strategies to mitigate the impact of gestational and congenital toxoplasmosis

Prenatal treatment for Toxoplasma infection aims to prevent neurological or visual impairment by the reduction of mother-to-child transmission of infection or, once the fetal infection has occurred, by limiting cell damage caused by the parasite [12,13]. Information on the effectiveness of prenatal treatment is limited since it is challenging to carry out randomized studies with untreated versus treated groups [12]. However, it is possible to evaluate cases in which pregnant women were not treated as they arrived late to reference centers, missed appointments, or did not perform adequate prenatal care. The prenatal approach relies on the hypotheses that maternal treatment reduces the risk of mother-to-child transmission and congenital infection treated prenatally is associated with a lower risk of severe lesions [14,15]. Neonatal diagnosis can be performed by collecting anti-T. gondii serology in the maternity ward or through universal blood screening on filter paper. This neonatal screening was implemented in Denmark and is carried out in the states of Massachusetts and New Hampshire in the United States and Colombia [1619]. The neonatal test using dried blood on filter paper became mandatory throughout Brazil in 2021 [20].

Brazil’s strategies

In Brazil, due to the high prevalence of toxoplasmosis, screening begins in the prenatal period to reduce the lifetime consequences of CT [21,22]. Since 2015, there has been a working group in the Brazilian Ministry of Health for the construction of integrated surveillance on gestational, congenital and acquired toxoplasmosis [23]. In 2016, gestational and CT became a disease of compulsory notification, which means an advance in the control of this pathogen once we understand better the impact that this disease has on the population [23]. Many advances have been achieved. The main purpose of screening is to identify susceptible pregnant women (without previous infection) for monitoring during pregnancy. Early detection aims to prevent fetal transmission and provide necessary gestational and postnatal treatment. All susceptible pregnant women (not infected) must perform at least three serology tests during pregnancy (in the first, second and third gestational trimesters) and another serology is recommended at the time of delivery or during the puerperium (on the maternity ward). The confirmed cases are referred for high-risk prenatal care. Ideally, serology for toxoplasmosis must be known in women before conception. Until 2018, there were no standardized guidelines for carrying out Brazil’s surveillance. However, some states of the union have developed protocols based on the local prevalence of the disease. The diagnosis is mainly based on indirect methods, such as serology (serology for the detection of IgG, IgM, IgA and the determination of IgG avidity anti-T. gondii), but also in methods of direct detection, such as molecular polymerase chain reaction techniques (real-time PCR and PCR), parasite isolation (cell cultures and inoculation in mice) and histological or immunohistological studies of the parasite [23]. The main methods used to confirm cases by the Brazilian Central Public Health Laboratories have been IgM, IgG serology and IgG avidity (until 16 gestational weeks). Eventually, they perform PCR according to laboratory capacity. Sometimes, it is necessary to combine different methods to achieve the proper assessment [23]. In 2021, the Ministry of Health included anti-T. gondii IgM serology in the heel prick test, which provides a greater chance of diagnosis in children despite maternal tests, given that it is performed universally (all children born in hospitals must have the heel prick test before discharge) [20].

Despite the advances, many challenges still need to be overcome, such as the implementation of public health services in the countryside, adequate training of health professionals to interpret laboratory results, guaranteeing the supply of drugs against gestational and congenital toxoplasmosis and, above all, providing evidence for the effectiveness of prenatal or postnatal treatment of toxoplasmosis.

In this study, we evaluated the benefit of drug treatment for pregnant women with acute toxoplasmosis as a protective factor in reducing the risk of congenital infection. Also, we evaluated the side effects of prenatal and postnatal drug treatment in children and assessed the risk of discontinuing the drug treatment in infants after two decreasing IgG anti-T. gondii serology tests. Finally, we describe clinical and radiological findings in children with congenital toxoplasmosis.

2. Material and methods

Ethics statement

The Ethics and Research Committee of the State University of Maringa approved this study (CAAE N° 09286918.5.0000.0104). The informed consent term was not obtained because the participants were kept anonymous.

Study design

The study was conducted from April 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021. This cohort study included all children born to women with confirmed acute toxoplasmosis (positive IgM and IgG anti-T. gondii) during prenatal care or diagnosed during delivery at the University Hospital of Maringá (HUM) University State of Maringá (UEM), South of Brazil. The HUM is certificated as a “Baby-friendly Hospital.” We used the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) to report this study.

Study population

The University Hospital of Maringá is located in the Northwest region of the state of Paraná. It is a teaching hospital that belongs to the State University of Maringá and provides care to 30 municipalities, which covers a population of approximately 800,000 inhabitants. Since 2005, the Hospital has offered specialized care to pregnant women suspected of having acute gestational toxoplasmosis through a high-risk outpatient clinic. In 2017, the hospital opened an exclusive outpatient clinic named "ToxoPed" for the follow-up of children born to these mothers.

Between 2017 and December 2021, 233 pregnant women were evaluated at the University Hospital of Maringá for suspected acute T. gondii infection. After analyzing and checking the exams (anti-T. gondii serologies, gestational ultrasounds) collected during the current pregnancy and evaluating the previous history of these women, we concluded that 130 had chronic toxoplasmosis (acquired before the current pregnancy), nine did not have the disease (they were referred due to an error in the interpretation of the serological exams) and 94 met the criteria for acute gestational toxoplasmosis.

Among the 94 acutely infected pregnant women, four children were born in particular hospitals and the mothers did no follow-up in our pediatric service. Twenty-six children were lost to follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic and their outcome was not concluded.

There were three spontaneous abortions, where it was not possible to assess the presence of the parasite by the pathological anatomy. The family of one of the mothers who had an abortion was found to be infected (her three children and her husband); our study group evaluated the case, but we could not prove the source of infection.

Finally, we had the opportunity to follow-up 61 children in the “ToxoPed” outpatient clinic to conclude whether there was transplacental transmission of the parasite (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Number of women and children evaluated for research.

Fig 1

Two groups of children were defined during follow-up. The first group was presumably infected children, called "exposed children". They presented negative serology for anti-T. gondii IgM, were IgG positive at birth and showed unaltered cerebrospinal fluid, physical examination, cranial computed tomography and retinal examinations. In this group, the IgG decreased and became negative during the first year of life and these children were considered free of toxoplasmosis. The second group was the children who were definitely infected during pregnancy. The following criteria were used to consider a child infected: i) positive anti-T. gondii IgM; ii) negative anti-T. gondii IgM but rising anti-T. gondii IgG; and iii) eye or brain lesions during follow-up.

Among the definitely infected children, we considered those who presented altered serology but unaltered brain tomography and no eye lesions to be asymptomatic.

Exclusion criteria were: children born to pregnant women with primary or acquired imunosupression, children with diseases or who used medications that could confuse the data analysis and children born to mothers who were chronically infected with T. gondii.

Laboratory procedure, follow-up and definitions

In the HUM/UEM high-risk prenatal care outpatient clinic, all of the pregnant women who confirmed acute toxoplasmosis received spiramycin when the infection was diagnosed in the first trimester and after 34 weeks of gestation, from 16 to 34 weeks of gestation, the women were treated with a combination of sulfadiazine, pyrimethamine and folinic acid. According to the institutional protocol (Table A in S1 File), all children started treatment at the maternity ward (rooming in) and were discharged using pyrimethamine, sulfadiazine and folinic acid. They had outpatient follow-ups every 45 days until they had completed 90 days. This way, the children had three serologies by the time they reached 90 days of life. The first serology was collected in the maternity ward after 24 hours of life (we did not use umbilical cord blood), the second when they were 30–35 days old and the third collected after 50 days. If the child presented a decrease in anti-T. gondii IgG serology at 90 days compared to the previous two readings, the medication was suspended and the follow-up continued every two months until one year. Children who were negative or had a zero value for anti-T. gondii IgG at 12 months old were defined as free of disease (the first group, “exposed”). Children considered infected received anti-Toxoplasma medication until 12 months of age. After reaching the age of one year, the medication was discontinued. All children can continue their follow-up at the "ToxoPed" outpatient clinic until they are 15 years-old. The intention is to follow these groups of children over time and study their neuropsychomotor development. Right now, our oldest patients are approximately 5 1/2 years old. Between 2017–2018, the amplified chemiluminescent method was used with Vitros ECiQ Toxoplasma IgG and IgM assays (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics), according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Since December 2019, we have used microparticle immunoassay with ARCHITECT Toxoplasma IgG and IgM kits, according to the manufacturer’s specifications (Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany).

In the group of infected children, after reaching the end of their first year of life, the medication was discontinued and the children continued with retinal assessments every six months in the first two years and were followed-up on psychomotor development. The social workers scheduled the child’s appointments in cases of absence. Neutropenia was considered when the number of neutrophils fell below 1,000/mm3.

Statistical analysis

The relative risk (RR) was calculated to assess whether prenatal treatment modifies the outcome in the child and to analyze the association between pediatric neutropenia and the condition “exposed” or “infected”. The significance of Fisher’s exact test level was p < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval. Logistic regression was calculated to assess whether the use of pyrimethamine by the mother was associated with pediatric neutropenia (Tables B, C, and D in S1 File).

We examined the relationship between exposed children, infected children, the number of infants’ neutrophils, maternal treatment and postnatal treatment. We used factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD) to analyze the data set. FAMD is a principal components method to describe, summarizes and visualize multidimensional matrix with mixed data. As any principal components method, its aim is to study the similarities between individuals, the relationships between variables and to link the study of the individuals with the variables. Such methods reduce the dimensionality of the data and provide subspace that best represent the data. Briefly, this statistical method makes possible to analyze the similarity between individuals by considering mixed types of variables. We explore the association between all variables (Tables E and F in S1 File). In the multifactorial evaluation, the quantitative variables were grouped into dimensions 1 and 2 according to their contribution value (Figs A and B in S1 File).

After analyzing the variables, we built a decision tree to verify the safety of suspending the medication after three decreasing values of IgG anti-T. gondii; for this, we used the Rpart library. All analyses used R 4.0.2 software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The principal libraries used were: factoextra, FactoMineR, ggplot2, dplyr and janitor. To correct the missing values, we used the algorithms contained in the input PCA of the R documentation [24,25]. The data is available on S1 Data.

3. Results

The follow-up was performed in 61 children to conclude whether there was transplacental transmission of the parasite: eleven (18%) had the infection confirmed (infected) and 50 (82%) were free of toxoplasmosis (exposed). Of the 50 who were disease-free, 44 were born to treated women and six were untreated (diagnosed during hospitalization for childbirth). Among the eleven infected children, seven were born to untreated women (Fig 1). Among the untreated women, only two did not have prenatal care and the others had negative third trimester tests. We found an RR = 0.15 among infected children which means that children born to untreated mothers have 6.5-times higher risk of being infected (p = 0.0006, CI 95% 0.05–0.44). The transmission rate among untreated mothers was 50% versus 8.3% among treated ones. All children started drug treatment in the maternity ward and 53/61 were suspended after three reducing serological tests (anti-T. gondii IgG). Among the eleven infected children, three were detected after discontinuing the medications; their anti-T. gondii IgG increased and the anti-T. gondii IgM remained negative; these three children remained asymptomatic. Thus, withdrawal of the medication did not cause clinical complications. The decision tree shows that three decreasing readings of anti-T. gondii IgG is a security parameter for stopping the child’s medication in the exposed group (Fig D in S1 File). Those considered exposed (50/61) became negative for anti-T. gondii IgG at an average of 9 months (ranging from 3–12 months).

Ten infected children completed treatment for up to 12 months and one infected child failed to continue drug treatment due to serious neutropenia. During the children’s follow-up, 59 children were allowed to analyze their blood counts serially and only neutropenia was significant among the other side effects (vomiting, nauseous, cutaneous rash, anemia, thrombocytopenia). We observed statistical significance in pediatric neutropenia (21/59; 35.6%) and the infected group (RR = 0.37 CI 95%: 0.20–0.67 p = 0.001). Children in the infected group are 2.7-times more likely to develop neutropenia.

All children who had neutropenia were under outpatient follow-up and did not have other diseases that could cause a low number of neutrophils. No neutropenic child was hospitalized when the blood test was altered. Among the infected patients who developed neutropenia, three were asymptomatic, and five were symptomatic (1 with ocular lesions and brain calcifications, 2 with brain calcifications, and 2 with ocular lesions). There was no correlation between maternal use of pyrimethamine and the presence of neutropenia in children (Table 1).

Table 1. General characteristics and statistical analysis.

General characteristics N(%)
Child
male 31 (50.8%)
female 30 (49.2%)
weigth birth 3,240* (2,810–3,520)** 53 (86.9%)
head circunference at birth 34 (33–35) 45 (73.8%)
protein in CSF 142 (48–540) 44 (72,1%)
Child neutropenia
No 38 (62.3%)
Yes 21 (34.4%)
no avaliable 2 (3.8%)
Mothers
Gestacional trimestre diagnosis
1st 14 (23%)
2nd 23 (38%)
3th 14 (23%)
Maternity ward 10 (16%)
Mother drug scheme
Protocol A 20(33%)
Protocol B 17(28%)
Protocol C 11(18%)
Statical analisys
Infected children and RR1 95% CI1 p-value1
no mother treatment 0.15 0.05–0.45 0.0006
neutropenia < 1000/mm3 0.37 0.20–0.67 0.0010
Mother pyrimethamine use and log(OR)2 95% CI1 p-value2
children neutropenia < 1000/mm3 0.6 0.4 -0.71–2.0 0.4

1 n (%), CI = Confidence Interval, CSF = cerebrospinal fluid

1t = first trimester, 2t = second trimester, 3t = thirst trimester

Protocol A = spiramycin

Protocol B = sulfadiazine, pyrimethamine, folinic acid + spiramycin

Protocol C = spiramycin + sulfadiazine, pyrimethamine, folinic acid + spiramycin

p-value1 = P value were calculated by Fisher- test

2 OR = Odds Ratio

p-value2 = P value were calculated by Logistic regression

*mean

** max-min

weigth in gramas, head circunference in centimeters, protein in miligramas/deciliters

Asymptomatic infected children (5/11) only had altered plasma serology (positive anti- T. gondii IgM and IgG) without clinical or radiological manifestations (calcifications, retinochorioditis). Among the asymptomatics, three mothers were diagnosed in the maternity ward, so they did not receive any drug treatment. The other two mothers were diagnosed in the third trimester and started medication, four and seven weeks from diagnosis. Six children had symptoms, three with cerebral calcifications, one with retinochorioditis and two with both. Gestational toxoplasmosis was detected in all trimesters but especially in the third one (Table 1).

We could make a real distinction between the two groups after FAMD. In Fig 2A, we can observe the formation of two groups; in dimension 1 (Dim1), the variables "no maternal treatment" (Mno), "maternity", "Neutropenia yes" (Nyes) group the infected individuals. In dimension 2 (Dim2), there is a closeness between the variables "second trimester" (2t), “third trimester” (3t), “first trimester” (1t), and the exposed individuals. In Fig 2B, the exposed and infected groups are well characterized visually. In this figure, each individual is represented by a dot. In Fig 2C, we visualize the individuals grouped by the variables that describe them.

Fig 2. Correlation among quantitative and qualitative variables.

Fig 2

2a: the variables with the highest correlation are closer to each other, we can observe a group (Dim 1) formed by the infected children (infected), untreated mothers (Mtno) and the diagnosis performed at the hospital maternity (maternity). The other group (Dim 2) includes children who have not confirmed congenital infection (exposed), maternal treatment (MTyes), children without neutropenia (Nno) and diagnoses performed in the second, third and first trimesters (1t, 2t, 3t). In Fig 2B, the individuals are represented by dots. In 2c individuals dots) are grouped by the variables.

4. Discussion

This study evaluated prenatal care and follow-up of children in southern Brazil. The results reinforce the importance of treating acute toxoplasmosis in the gestational period, with statistical evidence and more risk between the infected group and the absence of maternal treatment. Our data corroborate those of studies in other regions confirming the importance of toxoplasmosis screening and treatment during prenatal care and at the time of delivery to achieve the best outcomes for pregnant women and their babies [2629]. It is necessary to emphasize that the speed when starting treatment (pre- or post-natal) increases the chances of acting on tachyzoites [8,29]. As we know, spiramycin, pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine, the current standard therapy for toxoplasmosis, can suppress tachyzoite growth (the acute life cycle stage) but do not affect bradyzoites [30,31]. Tachyzoites are responsible for congenital infection when they are able to overcome the placental barrier. In this way, women infected during pregnancy (or around conception) are generally offered spiramycin, a potent macrolide antibiotic that concentrates in the placenta, making it an ideal preliminary treatment option for maternal-fetal transmission prevention. Unfortunately, spiramycin is ineffective for treating established fetal infection since it uncrosses the placental barrier [32]. Once the fetal infection is established, it is necessary to use medications to reach the fetus. In this context, the combination of sulfadiazine, pyrimethamine and folinic acid (SPF) is the recommended therapy [30,33,34].

A critical aspect observed in our research was that there was a higher risk of neutropenia in infected infants. It is important to emphasize that the comparison between neutrophil blood counts of both groups (exposed and infected) was made with samples collected in the first three months of life. In other words, all babies were under an anti-parasitic regimen. Concerning this, it is known that sulfadiazine and pyrimethamine are capable of causing neutropenia by acting in a deleterious manner on the bone marrow by the action of the drug on the folate cycle during DNA division. Therefore, we did not find any association between maternal use of SPF and neutropenia in the child, which makes us think about the impact of the parasite itself. An experimental study showed that mice infected by T. gondii (RH strain) presented leukocyte depletion in the bone marrow and peripheral blood [35]. They proposed that this neutropenia might be associated with the proliferative action of tachyzoites (cell lysis) and possible changes in other points of host cell metabolism. In this way, we postulated that the parasite, itself, might cause a higher risk of neutropenia in infected children. However, further human studies are needed to prove this point of view.

Among untreated women, only two did not have prenatal care and the others had negative third trimester tests. Nevertheless, when collected at the maternity hospital, they showed infection acquired in the last weeks of pregnancy. This finding corroborates the need for universal monthly testing of susceptible pregnant women and maternity wards, as in other countries such as France and Italy. The testing of mothers in hospital allows the detection of infected children who would otherwise be lost. The serology results (anti-T. gondii IgM and IgG) take 48 to 72 hours to be ready, at which point we promptly began the children’s treatment. It is worth remembering that in Brazil, in 2021, there was a significant advance in the diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis in children because the serological research on this zoonosis was included in the heel prick test. However, compared to the maternity test, the heel test can take up to 30 days to deliver results. Postnatal treatment has also decreased the development and worsening of new signs and symptoms. Bearing this and given the presence of more virulent strains in Brazil, that may cause tissue damage in infected children, our protocol is to discharge all children born to a mother with acute toxoplasmosis with triple treatment (SPF).

Ruling out pediatric infection is not easy because only a negative IgG test allows us to say that the child is free of disease [8]. The multidisciplinary monitoring associated with three sequential dosages of immunoglobulin G, with an interval of 30 days between them, proved to be a safe parameter for the suspension of the medication in exposed (uninfected) children. In addition to reducing adverse effects, it can save costs and reduce the burden of tasks that a mother has with her baby. We must consider that administering three drugs with different dosages more than once a day and every day of the week requires a considerable commitment for women who already have many tasks with their babies.

The limitations of this study were i) it was not possible to identify whether there was a difference in the prenatal transmission according to prophylactic treatment, spiramycin, or triple schedule; ii) the study has primarily captured data from children who attended public health services, meaning that children who were not seen in the public health services would have been undetected; iii) the COVID-19 pandemic caused losses and follow-up discontinuity, leading to data loss; and iv) despite being a representative sample for Southern Brazil, it is still a limited sample, requiring multicenter studies.

Through the multidisciplinary follow-up of pregnant women and their children, the use of serological and radiological tests, and the opportunity for drug treatment, a reduction in the risk of congenital toxoplasmosis transmission was verified. With careful follow-up, it was possible to suspend the drug in exposed children and maintain treatment only in infected children, reducing side effects and costs. Future studies must better elucidate neutropenia among infected children and clarify the relationship between neutrophils and Toxoplasma gondii.

Supporting information

S1 File. Care protocol, tables and images of statistical analysis.

(DOCX)

S1 Data. Data obtained from monitoring patients.

(XLSX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the State University of Maringá to AGGFS, RGF and ALFG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Dubey JP. Biology of Toxoplasma gondii. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans. 2021:7–89. doi: 10.1201/9781003199373-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Velázquez-Hernández N, Avilés Ávila AY, Rivas-González MA, Delgado-González SP, Alvarado-Félix GA, Alvarado-Félix ÁO, et al. Knowledge and practices regarding toxoplasmosis in housewives: A cross sectional study in a northern Mexican city. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0222094. PMCID: PMC6733448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weiss LM, Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis: A history of clinical observations. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39(8):895–901. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.02.004 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2704023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cabral Monica T, Pinto-Ferreira F, Martins FDC, de Matos RLN, de Matos AMRN, Santos AC, et al. Epidemiology of a toxoplasmosis outbreak in a research institution in northern Paraná, Brazil. Zoonoses Public Health. 2020;67(7):760–4. Epub 2020 Apr 29. doi: 10.1111/zph.12705 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Almeria S, Dubey JP. Foodborne transmission of Toxoplasma gondii infection in the last decade. An overview. Res Vet Sci. 2020. Epub 2020 Oct 24. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.10.019 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Strang A, Ferrari RG, do Rosário DK, Nishi L, Evangelista FF, Santana PL, et al. The congenital toxoplasmosis burden in Brazil: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Trop. 2020;211:105608. Epub 2020/07/03. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105608 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nayeri T, Sarvi S, Moosazadeh M, Amouei A, Hosseininejad Z, Daryani A. The global seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in women who had spontaneous abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(3):e0008103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008103 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7069604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peyron F, L’Ollivier C, Mandelbrot L, Wallon M, Piarroux R, Kieffer F, et al. Maternal and Congenital Toxoplasmosis: Diagnosis and Treatment Recommendations of a French Multidisciplinary Working Group. Pathogens. 2019;8(1). Epub 2019/02/20. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8010024 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6470622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dunn D, Wallon M, Peyron F, Petersen E, Peckham C, Gilbert R. Mother-to-child transmission of toxoplasmosis: risk estimates for clinical counselling. Lancet. 1999;353(9167):1829–33. Epub 1999/06/08. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08220-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Torgerson PR, Mastroiacovo P. The global burden of congenital toxoplasmosis: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(7):501–8. Epub 2013/07/05. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.111732 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3699792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Evangelista FF, Mantelo FM, Lima, Marchioro AA, Beletini LF, Souza AHd, et al. Prospective evalution of pregnant women with suspected acute toxoplasmosis treated in a reference prenatal care clinic at a university teaching hospital in Southern Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2020;62:e46. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7359740. doi: 10.1590/s1678-9946202062046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mandelbrot L, Kieffer F, Sitta R, Laurichesse-Delmas H, Winer N, Mesnard L, et al. Prenatal therapy with pyrimethamine + sulfadiazine vs spiramycin to reduce placental transmission of toxoplasmosis: a multicenter, randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(4):386.e1–.e9. Epub 2018 Jun 2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.05.031 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gras L, Wallon M, Pollak A, Cortina-Borja M, Evengard B, Hayde M, et al. Association between prenatal treatment and clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis in infancy: a cohort study in 13 European centres. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(12):1721–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb01844.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Binquet C, Lejeune C, Seror V, Peyron F, Bertaux AC, Scemama O, et al. The cost-effectiveness of neonatal versus prenatal screening for congenital toxoplasmosis. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0221709. Epub 2019/09/19. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221709 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6750576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cortina-Borja M, Tan HK, Wallon M, Paul M, Prusa A, Buffolano W, et al. Prenatal treatment for serious neurological sequelae of congenital toxoplasmosis: an observational prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2010;7(10). Epub 2010/10/23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000351 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2953528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maldonado YA, Read JS, Committee On Infectious D. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Congenital Toxoplasmosis in the United States. Pediatrics. 2017;139(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3860 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prusa AR, Kasper DC, Pollak A, Gleiss A, Waldhoer T, Hayde M. The Austrian Toxoplasmosis Register, 1992–2008. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015;60(2):e4–e10. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu724 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Röser D, Nielsen HV, Petersen E, Saugmann-Jensen P, Nørgaard-Pedersen B. Erratum to: Congenital toxoplasmosis—a report on the Danish neonatal screening programme 1999–2007. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2010;33(6):815–. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9124-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gallego-Marin C. Clinical Validation of a Western Blot Assay for Congenital Toxoplasmosis and Newborn Screening in a Hospital in Armenia (Quindio) Colombia. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 2005;52(2):107–12. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi072 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brasil. lei-14154-26-maio-2021-791392-norma. In: Deputados Cd, editor. https://www2.camara.leg.br: Brazil Government; 2021.
  • 21.Bigna JJ, Tochie JN, Tounouga DN, Bekolo AO, Ymele NS, Youda EL, et al. Global, regional, and country seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women: a systematic review, modelling and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69078-9 ; PMCID: PMC7374101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Castilho-Pelloso MP, Falavigna DL, Falavigna-Guilherme AL. Suspected acute toxoplasmosis in pregnant women. Rev Saude Publica. 2007;41(1):27–34. Epub 2007/02/03. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102007000100005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brasil. Congenital and gestational toxoplasmosis surveillance–Protocol for notification and investigation. In: Transmissíveis DdVdD, editor. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2018. p. 31. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Husson F, Le S, Pagès J. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R: CRC Press; 2010. 2010/11/15. 240 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Josse J, Husson F. missMDA: A Package for Handling Missing Values in Multivariate Data Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2016;70(1). doi: 10.18637/jss.v070.i01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Avelino MM, Amaral WN, Rodrigues IMX, Rassi AR, Gomes MBF, Costa TL, et al. Congenital toxoplasmosis and prenatal care state programs. Bmc Infectious Diseases. 2014;14. WOS:000331203300001. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bissati KE, El Bissati K, Levigne P, Lykins J, Adlaoui EB, Barkat A, et al. Global initiative for congenital toxoplasmosis: an observational and international comparative clinical analysis. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2018;7(1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0164-4 ; PMCID: PMC6160433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hijikata M, Morioka I, Okahashi A, Nagano N, Kawakami K, Komatsu A, et al. A prospective cohort study of newborns born to mothers with serum Toxoplasma gondii immunoglobulin M positivity during pregnancy. J Infect Chemother. 2022;28(4):486–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.12.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hotop A, Hlobil H, Gross U. Efficacy of rapid treatment initiation following primary Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(11):1545–52. Epub 2012/03/31. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis234 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hajj RE, Tawk L, Itani S, Hamie M, Ezzeddine J, El Sabban M, et al. Toxoplasmosis: Current and Emerging Parasite Druggable Targets. Microorganisms. 2021;9(12). PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8707595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Murata Y, Sugi T, Weiss LM, Kato K. Identification of compounds that suppress Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites and bradyzoites. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178203 PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5469451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Konstantinovic N, Guegan H, Stäjner T, Belaz S, Robert-Gangneux F. Treatment of toxoplasmosis: Current options and future perspectives. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019;15:e00036. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7033996. doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Castaño BL, Silva AA, Hernandez-Velasco LL, Pinheiro APDS, Gibaldi D, Mineo JR, et al. Sulfadiazine Plus Pyrimethamine Therapy Reversed Multiple Behavioral and Neurocognitive Changes in Long-Term Chronic Toxoplasmosis by Reducing Brain Cyst Load and Inflammation-Related Alterations. Front Immunol. 2022;13:822567. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9091718. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.822567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Buonsenso D, Pata D, Turriziani Colonna A, Iademarco M, De Santis M, Masini L, et al. Spyramicine and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Combination to Prevent Mother-To-Fetus Transmission of Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Pregnant Women: A 28-Years Single-center Experience. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2022;41(5):e223–e7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003469 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Petakov M, Stojanović N, Jovcić G, Bugarski D, Todorović V, Djurković-Djaković O. Hematopoiesis during acute Toxoplasma gondii infection in mice. Haematologia. 2002;32(4):439–55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12803118/. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011544.r001

Decision Letter 0

Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Hamed Kalani

23 Jan 2023

Dear Mrs strang,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Gestational toxoplasmosis treatment changes the child's prognosis: a cohort study in southern Brazil" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Hamed Kalani

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Ricardo Fujiwara

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer 1:

1. In the field of sample size and compliance with ethical requirements, there is a little ambiguity, which should be given more comprehensive explanations and evidence by the authors.

2. Toxoplasma gondii should be written in italics throughout the manuscript.

Reviewer 2:

1. The authors need to include the information on how the serological tests to detect IgG and IgM antibodies to T. gondii were performed? Did they use commercial kits for this purpose? If this is the case, they need to provide name of the kits and name of the companies that provide the kits.

2. The first paragraph of the Results section (Page 11): The authors state “All children started drug treatment in the maternity ward and 52/61 were suspended after three reducing serological tests (anti-T. gondii IgG)”. This statement makes readers to consider that 9 (61-52 =9) children showed serological evidence for having congenital infection. The authors also state “Among the eleven infected children, three were detected after discontinuing the medications”. These statements together make readers to consider 12 (9 + 3= 12) children were congenitally infected. However, the actual number of infected children was 11. The authors need to provide additional information to explain these numbers.

3. In relation to neutropenia in congenitally infected children, the authors referred an article an occurrence of neutropenia in a murine model of acute T. gondii infection. The authors need to include the information that this murine model is a lethal infection of animals with the virulent RH strain of the parasite. The authors also need to be more careful about applying the information from this murine model of the lethal infection to congenitally infected children.

4. Among 11 congenitally infected children, 5 were asymptomatic. It is important to provide the information on whether treatment of their mothers makes any association to determine their infected children become symptomatic or asymptomatic.

5. It is also important to perform the analysis on whether neutropenia is associated with symptomatic infection or not.

6. The authors need to provide more detailed descriptions in the description in the last paragraph of the “Results” section. This description needs to include what each of Figs. 2a, 2b, and 2c indicates and how these figures need to be read. It is also helpful to explain what each of Supplemental Figures 1, 2, and 3 indicates.

7.The end of the first paragraph on page 16: The meaning the following sentence is unclear; “Bearing this in mind and given the data that point to the presence of more virulent strains in Brazil (greater chance of tissue damage in infected children), the protocol is to discharge all children born to a mother with acute toxoplasmosis with triple treatment (SPF).”

8. In Supplemental Tables, all abbreviations (e.g. MTyes) need to be spelled out at the bottom of each Table.

9. It is unclear what Supplemental Figure 4 indicates.

10.. It will be helpful to include the information on what genotypes of T. gondii are abundant in the southern Brazil, where this clinical study was performed.

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011544.r003

Decision Letter 1

Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Hamed Kalani

23 May 2023

Dear Mrs strang,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Gestational toxoplasmosis treatment changes the child's prognosis: a cohort study in southern Brazil" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

The authors responded to the comments, and the manuscript needs to be carefully checked in terms of writing (for example: line 219 has a dot added after the parentheses and should be deleted) and the sentences need to be strengthened in terms of academic writing.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Hamed Kalani

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Ricardo Fujiwara

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

The authors responded to the comments, and the manuscript needs to be carefully checked in terms of writing (for example: line 219 has a dot added after the parentheses and should be deleted) and the sentences need to be strengthened in terms of academic writing.

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011544.r005

Decision Letter 2

Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Hamed Kalani

21 Jul 2023

Dear Mrs strang,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Gestational toxoplasmosis treatment changes the child's prognosis: a cohort study in southern Brazil' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Hamed Kalani

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Ricardo Fujiwara

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011544.r006

Acceptance letter

Ricardo Toshio Fujiwara, Hamed Kalani

14 Sep 2023

Dear Mrs Gomes Ferrari Strang,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Gestational toxoplasmosis treatment changes the child's prognosis: a cohort study in southern Brazil," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Care protocol, tables and images of statistical analysis.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Data. Data obtained from monitoring patients.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: answer_Reviewer_PLOS.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: answer_Reviewer_PLOS.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES