Skip to main content
Revista Paulista de Pediatria logoLink to Revista Paulista de Pediatria
letter
. 2023 Oct 3;42:e2023119. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2023119

What is the best method for introducing complementary feeding?

Qual o melhor método de introdução da alimentação complementar?

Sabrine Teixeira Ferraz Grunewald a
PMCID: PMC10593396  PMID: 37937637

Dear editors:

The study by Moreira et al. elucidated the adherence to different strategies of introducing complementary feeding to infants, showing that, in the evaluated sample, baby-led introduction to solids (BLISS) had the lowest adherence — less than 20% of the families —, being often replaced by a mixed method. 1 In this method, the caregiver is instructed to use the BLISS technique initially; however, if the child shows no interest in the food, the spoon is used to offer mashed food in the same meal.

The Brazilian Society of Pediatrics (Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria — SBP) updated its guidelines on baby-guided food introduction methods in 2017, highlighting their growing popularity and dissemination on the internet and in books for parents. As noted by SBP experts, scientific research on these methods remains scarce, and studies are often conducted with a small sample population. 2 Furthermore, we know that the food introduction process involves social, cultural, economic, and emotional issues, making the study by Moreira et al., conducted with Brazilian families, particularly welcome.

A Brazilian study with health professionals, mostly nutritionists, revealed that most of them recommend baby-led food introduction methods and believe in its potential advantages, although they emphasize discordant issues associated with the convenience of the method and allude to the concern/anxiety it can generate in caregivers. 3

The outcomes of the study by Moreira et al. were evaluated at seven months of age, i.e., just one month after the recommended age for the introduction of food. 1 Analyzing how the family behaves in association with the introduction methods as the child grows, develops, and takes on a new interest in different food shapes, textures, and flavors would be interesting. In addition, the families participating in the study were trained by health professionals in a workshop on the food introduction method that would be used, which unfortunately is not the reality in most Brazilian families.

Thus, as health professionals, we remain far from being able to recommend a specific method as optimal for introducing food to Brazilian children with promising evidence to support any such recommendation. Considering that each family has different needs, as healthcare professionals, it is important to stay updated with the evolving research on this subject.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Moreira PR, Nunes LM, Neves RO, Belin CH, Fuhr J, Gomes E, et al. Adherence to different methods for introducing complementary food to 7-month-old babies: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022;41:e2021235. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2021235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.A alimentação complementar e o método BLW (Baby-Led Weaning) Rio de Janeiro: SBP; 2017. [[cited 2023 june 08]]. Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria [homepage on the Internet] Available from: https://www.sbp.com.br/fileadmin/user_upload/19491c-GP_-_AlimCompl_-_Metodo_BLW.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Neves FS, Romano BM, Campos AAL, Pavam CA, Oliveira RMS, Candido APC, et al. Brazilian health professionals' perception about the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) method for complementary feeding: an exploratory study. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2021;40:e2020321. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2023 Oct 3;42:e2023119. [Article in Spanish]

Reply: What is the best method for introducing complementary feeding?

Qual o melhor método de introdução da alimentação complementar?

Paula Ruffoni Moreira ᵃ,*, Leandro Meirelles Nunes , Renata Oliveira Neves , Christy Hannah Sanini Belin , Jordana Fuhr , Erissandra Gomes , Adriela Mariath , Juliana Rombaldi Bernardi

Dear reader,

The authors appreciate your careful reading of our manuscript. 1

The results published in this manuscript refer to the reported adherence by mothers at seven months of age of the child. Also, the authors agree that a longitudinal evaluation is necessary since the child's first year of life is marked by intense acquisition of skills that can significantly impact feeding. In the design of the randomized clinical trial, the authors planned to assess adherence to complementary feeding methods at seven, nine, and 12 months. 2,3 However, the manuscript containing the complete data has not yet been published.

Furthermore, we emphasize that the mothers were unaware of the other methods and received the intervention they were randomized to. The planning of the randomized clinical trial occurred prior to the publication of the second edition of the Feeding Guide for Brazilian Children Under Two Years Old, which was published in 2019. 4 The first edition 5 did not include the recommendation for children to explore food with their hands, unlike the second, which does make this recommendation.

The authors agree that it is not common for families to receive training from healthcare professionals in a workshop to initiate food introduction methods with their children. This is both a limitation and a distinctive feature of our study.

Finally, the authors also agree that there is still insufficient evidence to support the recommendation of one complementary feeding method over another. Our research group is still analyzing and writing up the remaining results of the randomized clinical trial, and we hope to continue to contribute with high-quality scientific evidence to elucidate the topic.

The authors

REFERENCES

  • 1.Moreira PR, Nunes LM, Neves RO, Belin CHS, Fuhr J, Gomes E, et al. Adherence to different methods for introducing complementary food to 7-month-old babies: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022;41:e2021235. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2021235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nunes LM, Führ J, Belin CHS, Moreira PR, Neves RO, Brito ML, et al. Complementary feeding methods in the first year of life: a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2021;22:687–687. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05647-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nunes LM, Führ J, Belin CHS, Moreira PR, Neves RO, Brito ML, et al. Correction to: complementary feeding methods in the first year of life: a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):819–819. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05824-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brazil . Guia alimentar para crianças brasileiras menores de 2 anos. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2019. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde. Departamento de Promoção da Saúde. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brazil . Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Dez passos para uma alimentação saudável: guia alimentar para crianças menores de dois anos: um guia para o professional da saúde na atenção básica. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Paulista de Pediatria are provided here courtesy of Sociedade De Pediatria De Sao Paulo

RESOURCES