Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to investigate relationships for residents of English district health authorities between rates of discharges from acute hospitals for all conditions and variations in discharge rates for eight common conditions (five surgical, three medical). DESIGN--Hospital Inpatient Enquiry data on discharges for 1984 were analysed. Standardised discharge ratios (ratios of actual to expected numbers of discharges x 100) were derived for selected conditions and all conditions; and correlation coefficients for these statistics were calculated. Districts were grouped into quintiles according to the value of the standardised discharge ratio, and systematic variation within each quintile was calculated for the selected conditions. SETTING--The study involved all 192 English district health authorities, but 57 were excluded because the proportion of unspecified diagnoses exceeded 5%. PATIENTS--The analyses were based on 336,799 cases from 135 districts. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Discharge ratios for the medical conditions and one surgical condition were significantly correlated with the levels of total discharge rates (p less than 0.01). The medical conditions showed greater systematic variation in discharge ratios than the surgical conditions. There was no consistent pattern in the values of systematic variation for the selected conditions across the different levels of discharge ratios for all conditions. CONCLUSIONS--It is argued that the changes in the NHS introduced in April 1991 are intended to introduce greater equity in the standardised discharge ratios and increase the total numbers of discharges. The results of this analysis suggest that, even if these objectives were achieved, they may not result in increased levels of elective care, nor result in greater equity in terms of rates of discharge for individual conditions.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bevan G., Brazier J. Financial incentives of subregional RAWP. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Oct 3;295(6602):836–838. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6602.836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark J. D. Variation in Michigan hospital use rates: do physician and hospital characteristics provide the explanation? Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(1):67–82. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90330-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Griffith J. R., Wilson P. A., Wolfe R. A., Bischak D. P. Clinical profiles of hospital discharge rates in local communities. Health Serv Res. 1985 Jun;20(2):131–151. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holland W. W. The RAWP review: pious hopes. Resource Allocation Working Party. Lancet. 1986 Nov 8;2(8515):1087–1090. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90479-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McPherson K., Strong P. M., Epstein A., Jones L. Regional variations in the use of common surgical procedures: within and between England and Wales, Canada and the United States of America. Soc Sci Med A. 1981 May;15(3 Pt 1):273–288. doi: 10.1016/0271-7123(81)90011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicholl J. P., Thomas K. J., Williams B. T., Knowelden J. Contribution of the private sector to elective surgery in England and Wales. Lancet. 1984 Jul 14;2(8394):89–92. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)90253-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paul-Shaheen P., Clark J. D., Williams D. Small area analysis: a review and analysis of the North American literature. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1987 Winter;12(4):741–809. doi: 10.1215/03616878-12-4-741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wennberg J. E., Freeman J. L., Culp W. J. Are hospital services rationed in New Haven or over-utilised in Boston? Lancet. 1987 May 23;1(8543):1185–1189. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92152-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wennberg J. E., Gittelsohn A. Health care delivery in Maine I: patterns of use of common surgical procedures. J Maine Med Assoc. 1975 May;66(5):123-30, 149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]