Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1992 Feb;46(1):83–85. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.1.83

What can you ask about? The effect on response to a postal screen of asking about two potentially sensitive questions.

J Windsor 1
PMCID: PMC1059500  PMID: 1573368

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--The purpose was to determine whether asking about ethnic origin and housing tenure in a postal survey affects the response rate. DESIGN--The study derived from a postal survey designed to determine eligibility for a study of outpatients. A two way factorial design was used to look at the two experimental factors, questionnaires being randomly divided into four groups with or without questions about ethnic origin and housing tenure. PARTICIPANTS--10,000 people (1000 from each of 10 areas) were systematically sampled from electoral registers, the areas being chosen to give a nationally representative sample. MAIN RESULTS--The response rate was 66% irrespective of whether ethnic origin was asked about, but was 65% and 67% respectively to questionnaires with and without questions about housing tenure. CONCLUSIONS--Asking about ethnic origin did not affect the overall response to this survey although it is possible that the response from some ethnic minority groups was lower. Asking about housing tenure slightly, but significantly, decreased response.

Full text

PDF
83

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahmad W. I., Kernohan E. E., Baker M. R. Health of British Asians; a research review. Community Med. 1989 Feb;11(1):49–56. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alwash R., McCarthy M. Accidents in the home among children under 5: ethnic differences or social disadvantage? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 May 21;296(6634):1450–1453. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6634.1450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonovsky A. Social class, life expectancy and overall mortality. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1967 Apr;45(2):31–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cartwright A. Interviews or postal questionnaires? Comparisons of data about women's experiences with maternity services. Milbank Q. 1988;66(1):172–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cartwright A., Smith C. Identifying a sample of elderly people by a postal screen. Age Ageing. 1987 Mar;16(2):119–122. doi: 10.1093/ageing/16.2.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cartwright A., Windsor J. Who else responds to postal questionnaires? Are those involved in the subject of the study more likely to do so? Community Med. 1989 Nov;11(4):373–375. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacoby A. Possible factors affecting response to postal questionnaires: findings from a study of general practitioner services. J Public Health Med. 1990;12(2):131–135. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones I. G., Cameron D. Social class analysis--an embarrassment to epidemiology. Community Med. 1984 Feb;6(1):37–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liberatos P., Link B. G., Kelsey J. L. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87–121. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Siemiatycki J. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. Am J Public Health. 1979 Mar;69(3):238–245. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.3.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES