Skip to main content
Bioinformation logoLink to Bioinformation
. 2023 Jun 30;19(6):725–728. doi: 10.6026/97320630019725

Incidence neurosensory deficit in mandibular fractures

Sneha Alladi 1,*, Pradeep Dhasarathan 1,*, Hemavathy OR Muralidoss 1,*, Krishnan Murugesan 1,*, Vedha Vivigdha 1,*
PMCID: PMC10598366  PMID: 37885783

Abstract

Sensory disturbances in the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) prior to treatment can be attributed to various factors, including the site, type of fracture, and fracture displacement. Therefore, it is of interest to assess the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injuries associated with mandibular fractures before and after surgical treatment. Group A consisted of patients with inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia before treatment, while Group B consisted of patients with inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after treatment. A significant difference was observed between the two groups, with a p-value of 0.031 (p <0.05) with the overall incidence of IAN deficit was 57.33% before treatment and 61.33% after treatment. These findings highlight the importance of promptly identifying and managing IAN injuries to minimize long-term consequences.

Keywords: Neurosensory deficit, Mandibular fractures, Lower Lip paraesthesia, Inferior alveolar nerve, mental nerve

Background:

Mandibular fractures represent a common and significant component of maxillofacial trauma, with the mandible being the most frequently fractured bone in the facial skeleton [1, 2]. It can lead to various complications, such as occlusal derangement, airway obstruction, and paresthesia. Among the potential complications of mandibular fractures, injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) have garnered considerable attention due to their clinical implications and impact on patient outcomes [3]. Neurosensory deficits associated with the inferior alveolar nerve include paresthesia, hyperesthesia, and loss of tooth vitality. Paresthesia and loss of tooth vitality are the most commonly observed neurosensory disturbance in mandibular fractures, with paresthesia of the lower lip being the most prominent. Sensory disturbances in the inferior alveolar nerve before treatment can be attributed to various factors, including the site, type of fracture, and fracture displacement [4]. Postoperatively, nerve paresthesia is frequently observed neurosensory disturbance, resulting from injury to the inferior alveolar nerve caused by traction, manipulation, and iatrogenic factors. Although these sensory disturbances are often transient, they can cause considerable discomfort and functional limitations during healing. Therefore, assessing the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injuries associated with mandibular fractures before and after surgical treatment is of interest.

Materials and Methods:

This study was conducted at a private dental college's Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The study involved a cohort of 150 patients diagnosed with mandibular fractures. The study period included from November 2021 to November 2022. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Research Board Committee. All the demographic data was collected from each patient. The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with mandibular fractures that extended from the mental foramen to the mandibular foramen, patients who had unilateral fractures, and patients who underwent surgical intervention for mandibular fractures. Exclusion criteria encompassed patients under the age of 18 (pediatric fractures), patients with multiple mandibular fractures, unilateral fractures of the condyle, fractures of the symphysis, pathological fractures, and Patients with a history of mandibular fractures or existing neurosensory deficit. The groups consisted of patients with inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia. Group A consisted of patients with inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia before treatment, while Group B consisted of patients with inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after treatment. The paresthesia was assessed using a light touch test, which involved gently touching the lip with a cotton wisp while the patient's eyes were closed. This test evaluated the detection threshold for tactile stimulation.

Surgical Procedure:

Under general anesthesia with standard aseptic protocols, an injection of 1:200000 adrenalines was administered. The surgical approaches were intra-oral when there was an absence of existing laceration. A full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated. Mental nerve was identified and carefully dissected. Fracture segments were identified and reduced using mini plates. The closure was done with simple interrupted sutures using 3-0 polyglactin.

Statistical analysis:

All the acquired data were entered into Excel Spreadsheet (Microsoft, USA). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The data were normally distributed and therefore non-parametric tests were performed. The data were expressed as Mean and SD. McNemar Test was performed between the groups. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

A total of 150 patients with mandibular fractures were included in the study. The mean age was 34.3 years, and the majority of patients were male (56%) (Table 1 and Figure 1). Assaults were the leading cause of mandibular fractures (38%), followed by road traffic accident (36%) and falls (26%). This image represents a pie chart depicting the total distribution of age among the study samples considered within the limits of the study. The chart shows that 64.67% of participants were female, while 35.33% were male. The most common fracture site was the body of the mandible (54.67%), followed by the angle (42%) and the ramus (3.33%). Among these, the ramus fracture did not show any inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) deficit. However, IAN deficit was observed in 37 patients with angle fracture and 49 patients with a body of the mandible fracture before treatment (Table 2) (Figure 2).

Table 1. Demographic representation of the population.

Mean Age Male Female
N (150) 34.3 ±7.67 97 (64.67%) 53 (35.33%)
The table displayed provides the demographic information of the participants included in the study. The mean age of the subjects was 34.03 ± 7.67 with a gender distribution of 64.67% of the patients being male and 35.33% being female.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Gender Distribution

Table 2. IAN injury and site of fracture before treatment.

Cause Patients (N) Percentage
With IAN deficit Without IAN deficit Total
Ramus 0 5 5 3.33%
Angle 37 26 63 42%
Body 49 33 82 54.67%
Total 86 64 150 100

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Incidence of Paresthesia Based on Fracture Site Inferior Alveolar Nerve (IAN).

The crosstabs among the two groups showed that there were 86 cases of paresthesia present both before and after treatment, 58 cases where paresthesia was absent both before and after treatment, and 6 cases where paresthesia was absent before treatment but present after treatment. The descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using binomial distribution and the McNemar Test. A significant difference was observed between the two groups, with a p-value of 0.031 (p < 0.05) (Table 3) (Figure 3). The overall incidence of IAN deficit was 57.33% before treatment and 61.33% after treatment.

Table 3. Descriptive statistical analysis.

GroupA and GroupB
GroupA GroupB
Absent Present
Absent 58 6
Present 0 86
Test Statisticsa
GroupA and GroupB
N 150
Exact Sig. (2-tailed) .031b

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Bar Diagram of Incidence of Paresthesia

Discussion:

Mandibular fractures are a common consequence of facial trauma, often resulting in injury to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and causing sensory disturbances to the lower lip and chin [4]. The IAN can be damaged within the mandibular canal or after its exit from the mental foramen, either due to direct trauma or surgical reduction and fixation of the fracture. Posttraumatic disorders of the IAN significantly impact patients' quality of life [5], yet there is limited documentation on the incidence and patterns of posttraumatic IAN sensory disturbances in the maxillofacial trauma literature [6] [7]. Therefore, it is important to investigate the incidence of IAN injury in trauma patients with mandibular fractures during the presentation. A study reported hypoesthesia of the inferior alveolar nerve in 27% of patients preoperatively and in 46% of patients postoperatively [8]. Additionally, another study reported higher rates of incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury after treatment (53.8%), compared to before treatment (33.7%) [9]. these studies provide findings consistent with the results of this study. The most common complications of open reduction and internal fixation include pain, swelling, trismus, paresthesia, and plate removal [10,11, 12]. Additionally, neurosensory disturbances of the IAN can present as loss of vitality in affected teeth, with 81% of the affected teeth showing no response [13]. Studies have demonstrated that closed reduction can help prevent post-treatment nerve injury [14]. While anatomical variations in the course of the inferior alveolar nerve exist, there are no studies presenting these variations in IAN injuries [15, 16, 17, 18, 19].

Conclusions:

The overall incidence of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injuries was 57.33%, with neurosensory disturbances reported in 86 patients before treatment and 61.33% reported in 92 patients after treatment. The mean age was 34.3 years, and the majority of patients were male (56%). Assaults were the leading cause of mandibular fractures (38%), followed by road traffic accidents (36%) and falls (26%). The highest incidence of IAN deficit was observed in patients with the body of the mandible fracture before treatment, which may be due to the injury caused post-trauma. These findings highlight the importance of promptly identifying and managing IAN injuries to minimize long-term consequences.

Edited by P Kangueane

Citation: Sneha et al. Bioinformation 19(6):725-728(2023)

Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.

Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.

License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.

Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.

Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.

References

  • 1.Abhinav RP, et al. Ann Maxillofac Surg. . 2019;9:114. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_233_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Subhashini R, et al. Int J Dent Oral Sci. . 2020;1054 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lamphier J, et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. . 2003;61:745. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00147-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boffano P, et al. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. . 2014;7:280. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marchena JM, et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. . 1998;56:822. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bede SYH, et al. J Craniofac Surg. . 2012;23:1776. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318266fda3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bergh van den B, et al. J Craniofac Surg. . 2011;22:1631. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e5f20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jan Samuel Schenkel, et al. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. . 2016;44:743. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tay ABG, et al. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery . 2015;73:1328. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ravikumar C, Bhoj M. Indian J Dent Res. . 2019;30:94. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_116_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kandamani J, et al. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. . 2022;13:84. doi: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_118_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ahmed R, et al. Int J Dent Oral Sci. . 2021;3387 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brajdić D, et al. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. . 2011;40:266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Halpern LR, et al. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery . 2004;62:576. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kavarthapu A, Thamaraiselvan M. Indian journal of dental research. . 2018;29:405. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_418_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pradeep Christopher Jesudas, et al. Int J Dent Oral Sci. . 2021;4320 [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jayaindhraeswaran J, et al. Int J Dent Oral Sci. . 2021;3483 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Surathu N, et al. J Oral Implantol. . 2022;48:92. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Geethika B, et al. Int J Dent Oral Sci. . 2021;4091 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioinformation are provided here courtesy of Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group

RESOURCES