Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1994 Feb;48(1):74–78. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.1.74

Is use of hospital services a proxy for morbidity? A small area comparison of the prevalence of arthritis, depression, dyspepsia, obesity, and respiratory disease with inpatient admission rates for these disorders in England.

J N Payne 1, J Coy 1, S Patterson 1, P C Milner 1
PMCID: PMC1059898  PMID: 8138774

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To examine the relationship between specific types of morbidity, measured by validated survey questions, and hospital service use and mortality to see if the latter two could act as a proxy in health needs assessment, health service planning, and resource allocation in a typical health district. DESIGN--A postal questionnaire was used to provide information about depression, digestive disorders, musculo-skeletal disorders, obesity, respiratory disease, and hip and knee pain. The questions were from survey instruments that have been widely used to derive information about these conditions. The relationships between the prevalence of these specific types of morbidity and appropriate admission and mortality rates were explored using linear regression and Pearson correlation analysis. SETTING--The population of Rotherham health district, England. SUBJECTS--A simple random sample of the residents of each of the 22 electoral wards in Rotherham health district. RESULTS--Responses were obtained from 78% of the 5000 sampled (82% after excluding people who had moved house or died). Significant, positive correlations were found between the prevalence of respiratory disease and the hospital admission and mortality rates for respiratory problems (r = 0.68, p < 0.01 and r = 0.54, p < 0.01) and the prevalence of depression and the admission rate for depression (r = 0.52, p < 0.05). No such relations were found for digestive disease, musculo-skeletal disease, and obesity. For the conditions examined here, hospital service use was a more useful measure than mortality. CONCLUSIONS--Only two diseases (respiratory disease and depression) out of the seven diseases or procedures investigated showed a positive correlation between hospital admission and disease prevalence. But even for these two, the correlations explained less than 50% of the variance. Caution must be exercised when hospital service use is being considered as a proxy for morbidity.

Full text

PDF
74

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bucquet D., Curtis S. Socio-demographic variation in perceived illness and the use of primary care: the value of community survey data for primary care service planning. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(7):737–744. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90122-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell D. A., Radford J. M., Burton P. Unemployment rates: an alternative to the Jarman index? BMJ. 1991 Sep 28;303(6805):750–755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6805.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carstairs V., Morris R. Deprivation, mortality and resource allocation. Community Med. 1989 Nov;11(4):364–372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlton J. R., Lakhani A. Is the Jarman underprivileged area score valid? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jun 8;290(6483):1714–1716. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6483.1714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Connell F. A., Blide L. A., Hanken M. A. Clinical correlates of small area variations in population-based admission rates for diabetes. Med Care. 1984 Oct;22(10):939–949. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198410000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Curtis S. E. Use of survey data and small area statistics to assess the link between individual morbidity and neighbourhood deprivation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Mar;44(1):62–68. doi: 10.1136/jech.44.1.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Franks P. J., Adamson C., Bulpitt P. F., Bulpitt C. J. Stroke death and unemployment in London. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Mar;45(1):16–18. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.1.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hayward R. A., Shapiro M. F., Oye R. K. Laboratory testing on cerebrospinal fluid. A reappraisal. Lancet. 1987 Jan 3;1(8523):1–4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)90698-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hunt S. M., McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Health Illn. 1980 Nov;2(3):231–246. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11340686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunt S. M., McKenna S. P., McEwen J., Williams J., Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med A. 1981 May;15(3 Pt 1):221–229. doi: 10.1016/0271-7123(81)90005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jarman B. Identification of underprivileged areas. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 28;286(6379):1705–1709. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6379.1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson I. S., Milner P. C. Is the Jarman score better than social class at assessing the need for prevention and primary care? Fam Pract. 1988 Jun;5(2):105–110. doi: 10.1093/fampra/5.2.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones R., Lydeard S. Prevalence of symptoms of dyspepsia in the community. BMJ. 1989 Jan 7;298(6665):30–32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6665.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marmot M. G., Smith G. D., Stansfeld S., Patel C., North F., Head J., White I., Brunner E., Feeney A. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet. 1991 Jun 8;337(8754):1387–1393. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mays N., Chinn S. Relation between all cause standardised mortality ratios and two indices of deprivation at regional and district level in England. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Jun;43(2):191–199. doi: 10.1136/jech.43.2.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McPherson K., Wennberg J. E., Hovind O. B., Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Morgan M., Mays N., Holland W. W. Can hospital use be a measure of need for health care? J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987 Dec;41(4):269–274. doi: 10.1136/jech.41.4.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Payne J. N., Coy J., Milner P. C., Patterson S. Are deprivation indicators a proxy for morbidity? A comparison of the prevalence of arthritis, depression, dyspepsia, obesity and respiratory symptoms with unemployment rates and Jarman scores. J Public Health Med. 1993 Jun;15(2):161–170. doi: 10.1007/BF02959657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Roos N. P., Roos L. L., Jr Surgical rate variations: do they reflect the health or socioeconomic characteristics of the population? Med Care. 1982 Sep;20(9):945–958. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198209000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Royston G. H., Hurst J. W., Lister E. G., Stewart P. A. Modelling the use of health services by populations of small areas to inform the allocation of central resources to larger regions. Socioecon Plann Sci. 1992 Jul;26(3):169–180. doi: 10.1016/0038-0121(92)90008-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wennberg J. E. Population illness rates do not explain population hospitalization rates. A comment on Mark Blumberg's thesis that morbidity adjusters are needed to interpret small area variations. Med Care. 1987 Apr;25(4):354–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wennberg J., Gittelsohn Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973 Dec 14;182(4117):1102–1108. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4117.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES