Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1994 Jun;48(3):297–305. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.3.297

Antenatal screening: its use in assessing obstetric risk factors in Zimbabwe.

V D Tsu 1
PMCID: PMC1059963  PMID: 8051531

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--To assess the predictive utility of obstetric risk factors for identifying before the onset of labour those women at high risk of obstetric complications in a developing world setting, where home deliveries predominate and emergency transport is scarce. DESIGN--Risk factors derived from two population based, case-control studies (one of cephalopelvic disproportion and one of post partum haemorrhage), carried out in Zimbabwe were used to construct weighted and unweighted scores, a variety of screening algorithms, and sets of probabilities estimated from logistic regression models. These screening tests were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and "cost" (the proportion of the population testing positive). Each complication was evaluated separately and the two were then pooled. PARTICIPANTS--All were Harare residents with singleton, vertex deliveries and spontaneous onset of labour. A total of 201 experienced cephalopelvic disproportion, 150 had post partum haemorrhage, and 299 had normal, unassisted deliveries. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Largely because of the very low incidence of the two complications studied (1% or less), positive predictive values were low (less than 7%). Holding "cost" constant at 10%, a screening test for cephalopelvic disproportion could predict 42.3% of cases compared with only 35.0% of those with post partum haemorrhage. Weighted scores had little advantage over unweighted ones, and probabilities from the logistic regression models did not differentiate cases from controls very well. CONCLUSIONS--With simple algorithms based on maternal height, parity, and obstetric history, more than one third of women at risk for potentially fatal complications could be identified at relatively small cost to themselves or the health care system.

Full text

PDF
297

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adelstein P., Fedrick J. Antenatal identification of women at increased risk of being delivered of a low birth weight infant at term. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978 Jan;85(1):8–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1978.tb15817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aitken I. W., Walls B. Maternal height and cephalopelvic disproportion in Sierra Leone. Trop Doct. 1986 Jul;16(3):132–134. doi: 10.1177/004947558601600313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Araujo G., Araujo L., Janowitz B., Wallace S., Potts M. Improving obstetric care in northeast Brazil. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 1983;17(3):233–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aubry R. H., Nesbitt R. E., Jr High risk obstetrics. I. Perinatal outcome in relation to a broadened approach to obstetric care for patients at special risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969 Sep 15;105(2):241–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bauer O., Kingu R., Laussen T., Mbwana K. Pelvic assessment and cephalo-pelvic disproportion in Central Tanzania. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1988 Dec;27(3):323–325. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(88)90107-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Begley C. M. A comparison of 'active' and 'physiological' management of the third stage of labour. Midwifery. 1990 Mar;6(1):3–17. doi: 10.1016/s0266-6138(05)80091-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bullough C. H., Msuku R. S., Karonde L. Early suckling and postpartum haemorrhage: controlled trial in deliveries by traditional birth attendants. Lancet. 1989 Sep 2;2(8662):522–525. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90652-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Pregnancy risk factor assessment--north area of Santiago, Chile, 1982-1983. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1985 Jun 7;34(22):335–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Essex B. J., Everett V. J. Use of an action-orientated record for antenatal screening. Trop Doct. 1977 Jul;7(3):134–138. doi: 10.1177/004947557700700316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Everette V. J. The relationship between maternal height and cephalopelvic disproportion in Dar es Salaam. East Afr Med J. 1975 May;52(5):251–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuchs K., Peretz B. A., Marcovici R., Paldi E., Timor-Tritsh I. The "grand multipara"--is it a problem? A review of 5785 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1985 Sep;23(4):321–326. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(85)90027-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herman A. A., Irwig L. M., Groeneveld H. T. Evaluating obstetric risk scores by receiver operating characteristic curves. Am J Epidemiol. 1988 Apr;127(4):831–842. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Horton T., Chase E. S. A STUDY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE SCORE SYSTEM TO THE SANITARY QUALITY OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES IN NEW YORK STATE. Am J Public Health (N Y) 1917 Apr;7(4):380–390. doi: 10.2105/ajph.7.4.380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaminski M., Goujard J., Rumeau-Rouquette C. Prediction of low birthweight and prematurity by a multiple regression analysis with maternal characteristics known since the beginning of the pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol. 1973 Summer;2(2):195–204. doi: 10.1093/ije/2.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kumar V., Datta N. Home-based mothers' health records. World Health Forum. 1988;9(1):107–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Leke R. J., Nasah B. T., Mtango F. D. Introduction of high risk pregnancy care in rural Cameroon: health service research approach. J Obstet Gynaecol East Cent Africa. 1988 May;7(7):7–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lennox C. E. Assessment of obstetric high risk factors in a developing country. Trop Doct. 1984 Jul;14(3):125–129. doi: 10.1177/004947558401400309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liljestrand J., Bergström S., Westman S. Maternal height and perinatal outcome in Mozambique. J Trop Pediatr. 1985 Dec;31(6):306–310. doi: 10.1093/tropej/31.6.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Marshall V. A. A comparison of two obstetric risk assessment tools. J Nurse Midwifery. 1989 Jan-Feb;34(1):3–7. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(89)90122-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morrison I., Carter L., McNamara S., Cheang M. A simplified intrapartum numerical scoring system. The prediction of high risk in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Sep 15;138(2):175–180. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90031-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mtimavalye L. A., van der Does C. D., Maathuis J. B. The relationship between increasing birthweight and cephalopelvic disproportion in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1974 May;81(5):380–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1974.tb00482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Prendiville W., Elbourne D., Chalmers I. The effects of routine oxytocic administration in the management of the third stage of labour: an overview of the evidence from controlled trials. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Jan;95(1):3–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06475.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Royston E., Lopez A. D. On the assessment of maternal mortality. World Health Stat Q. 1987;40(3):214–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sogbanmu M. O. Perinatal mortality and maternal mortality in General Hospital, Ondo, Nigeria use of high-risk pregnancy predictive scoring index. Niger Med J. 1979 Apr;9(4):475–479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsu V. D. Maternal height and age: risk factors for cephalopelvic disproportion in Zimbabwe. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;21(5):941–946. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.5.941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Walther F. J. At-risk selection and outcome studied at the Kibara Hospital antenatal clinic in Tanzania. Trop Geogr Med. 1980 Dec;32(4):336–339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Watson D. S. Use of "at risk" antenatal score card by aboriginal health workers in Arnhem Land. Trop Doct. 1984 Jul;14(3):133–135. doi: 10.1177/004947558401400311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES