Abstract
Vancouver Island, on Canada’s West Coast, is a hotspot for human infection by the environmental fungus Cryptococcus gattii sensu lato (C. gattii), with one of the highest incidence rates worldwide.1 C. gattii, which can colonize certain tree species,2 can cause cryptococcosis—a severe, sometimes fatal respiratory and neurological illness that primarily affects individuals with healthy immune systems.3,4 Previous studies have suggested that environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and vegetation contribute to the presence of C. gattii in certain regions.2,5 The contribution of disturbing forest areas, however, has remained unclear.
A study recently published in Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP)6 examined the relationship between forest disturbance from tree harvesting and the risk of C. gattii infection in people on Vancouver Island. The findings suggest that tree harvesting may indeed influence the incidence of this fungal disease. First author Emily Acheson, who was completing her PhD at the University of British Columbia at the time of the research, was intrigued by earlier findings that linked individual tree cutting with increased aerosolization of C. gattii spores.7 She wanted to investigate this relationship on a broader scale.
Acheson and her colleagues collected data on C. gattii infection cases on Vancouver Island from 1998 to 2014 from the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control. To assess tree harvesting, they incorporated satellite imagery and land-use records from the same period. The team mapped 2.5-km buffer zones around human settlement areas, up to 20 km out, in eastern Vancouver Island. Then they summed the area of annual tree harvests occurring within each buffer zone. The team found a positive correlation between tree harvesting and C. gattii incidence rates, corroborating the earlier research.
Karen Bartlett, a professor emeritus in the University of British Columbia’s Occupational and Environmental Health Division, notes the study’s contribution to understanding the connection between land use and infectious diseases. Bartlett served as an advisor for Acheson’s dissertation, upon which the paper is based. She says her own earlier research7,8 on C. gattii revealed complex ecological factors involved in the spread of cryptococcosis, for example, the activities of companion animals such as horses, cats, and dogs. These findings point to the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration in disease prevention and mitigation, as well as other proactive efforts, says Bartlett. She suggests training public health workers to anticipate and address emerging infectious disease risks, as well as training scientists and medical practitioners to better understand environmental influences on the dynamics of cryptococcosis.
Sarah Kidd, head of SA Pathology’s National Mycology Reference Centre in Adelaide, Australia, explains that tree harvesting and other forest disturbances may lead to aerosolization of wood particles, soil, and microorganisms—including C. gattii. In turn, aerosolization of microbes can promote their spread to new areas and initiate infections when inhaled by humans and other animals. Kidd, who as a postdoctoral researcher studied C. gattii emergence on Vancouver Island,9 cites historical evidence among forestry workers10 and others11–13 showing that soil disturbances can cause fungal infections. “C. gattii has also been shown to be present in air samples, soil, fresh water, and sea water, and on shoes and car tires, where it has potential for further spread,” she says.
Notably, Kidd’s work9 found that native tree species such as Douglas fir and alder were susceptible to C. gattii colonization. In addition to plentiful hosts, climate change and the prevalence of a strain tolerant of temperate climates, called VGIIa,9 may both contribute to the high incidence of C. gattii infections on Vancouver Island.14,15 Kidd highlights the need for risk assessment and mitigation strategies in forestry practices to protect workers and communities. Forestry workers, for example, could wear respirators during certain activities. Bartlett cautions, however, that unlike other outbreaks, on Vancouver Island those affected were older individuals (but not classically immunocompromised), rather than forest workers.16 “Mitigation depends on observing the facts of an outbreak and the environmental factors that may lead to an increased population risk in a changing climate,” she says.
To better understand the mechanisms underlying the relationship between forest disturbance and C. gattii infection risk, Acheson suggests that future research should investigate the potential combined effects of environmental factors, such as temperature, and tree harvesting on the risk of C. gattii infections. In addition, she calls for long-term monitoring of both tree harvesting and C. gattii infection rates to assess the persistence and magnitude of this association over time. Acheson hopes to expand the team’s work into studies of other fungal pathogens, such as Blastomyces, a fungus found largely in the Midwestern, South Central, and Southeastern United States.17 She notes that fieldwork to supplement remote sensing and geographic information systems work will allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the ecology of these fungi and of possible control measures to reduce the burden of cryptococcosis.
Biography
Olayinka Osuolale, PhD, is an environmental health and microbiology researcher and a senior lecturer at Elizade University, Ilara Mokin, Nigeria. He is currently a member of the EHP Early Career Researcher Initiative Advisory Panel.
References
- 1.Galanis E, MacDougall L, Kidd S, Morshed M, British Columbia Cryptococcus gattii Working Group. 2010. Epidemiology of Cryptococcus gattii, British Columbia, Canada, 1999–2007. Emerg Infect Dis 16(2):251–257, PMID: , 10.3201/eid1602.090900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kwon-Chung KJ, Fraser JA, Doering TL, Wang Z, Janbon G, Idnurm A, et al. . 2014. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii, the etiologic agents of cryptococcosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 4(7):a019760, PMID: , 10.1101/cshperspect.a019760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen SCA, Slavin MA, Heath CH, Playford EG, Byth K, Marriott D, et al. . 2012. Clinical manifestations of Cryptococcus gattii infection: determinants of neurological sequelae and death. Clin Infect Dis 55(6):789–798, PMID: , 10.1093/cid/cis529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen SCA, Meyer W, Sorrell TC. 2014. Cryptococcus gattii infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 27(4):980–1024, PMID: , 10.1128/CMR.00126-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Serna-Espinosa BN, Guzmán-Sanabria D, Forero-Castro M, Escandón P, Sánchez-Quitian ZA. 2021. Environmental status of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in Colombia. J Fungi (Basel) 7(6):410, PMID: , 10.3390/jof7060410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Acheson ES, Otterstatter M, Galanis E. 2023. Forest disturbance and disease: exploring the effects of tree harvesting area on Cryptococcus gattii sensu lato infection risk, Vancouver Island, Canada, 1998–2014. Environ Health Perspect 131(7):077009, PMID: , 10.1289/EHP12396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kidd SE, Bach PJ, Hingston AO, Mak S, Chow Y, MacDougall L, et al. . 2007. Cryptococcus gattii dispersal mechanisms, British Columbia, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 13(1):51–57, PMID: , 10.3201/eid1301.060823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bartlett KH, Cheng PY, Duncan C, Galanis E, Hoang L, Kidd S, et al. . 2012. A decade of experience: Cryptococcus gattii in British Columbia. Mycopathologia 173(5–6):311–319, PMID: , 10.1007/s11046-011-9475-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kidd SE, Hagen F, Tscharke RL, Huynh M, Bartlett KH, Fyfe M, et al. . 2004. A rare genotype of Cryptococcus gattii caused the cryptococcosis outbreak on Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(49):17258–17263, PMID: , 10.1073/pnas.0402981101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vaaler AK, Bradsher RW, Davies SF. 1990. Evidence of subclinical blastomycosis in forestry workers in northern Minnesota and northern Wisconsin. Am J Med 89(4):470–476, PMID: , 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90378-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pearson D, Ebisu K, Wu X, Basu R. 2019. A review of coccidioidomycosis in California: exploring the intersection of land use, population movement, and climate change. Epidemiol Rev 41(1):145–157, PMID: , 10.1093/epirev/mxz004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schneider E, Hajjeh RA, Spiegel RA, Jibson RW, Harp EL, Marshall GA, et al. . 1997. A coccidioidomycosis outbreak following the Northridge, Calif, earthquake. JAMA 277(11):904–908, PMID: , 10.1001/jama.1997.03540350054033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Flynn NM, Hoeprich PD, Kawachi MM, Lee KK, Lawrence RM, Goldstein E, et al. . 1979. An unusual outbreak of windborne coccidioidomycosis. N Engl J Med 301(7):358–361, PMID: , 10.1056/NEJM197908163010705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cogliati M. 2021. Global warming impact on the expansion of fundamental niche of Cryptococcus gattii VGI in Europe. Environ Microbiol Rep 13(3):375–383, PMID: , 10.1111/1758-2229.12945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.van Rhijn N, Bromley M. 2021. The consequences of our changing environment on life threatening and debilitating fungal diseases in humans. J Fungi (Basel) 7(5):367, PMID: , 10.3390/jof7050367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.MacDougall L, Fyfe M, Romney M, Starr M, Galanis E. 2011. Risk factors for Cryptococcus gattii infection, British Columbia, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 17(2):193–199, PMID: , 10.3201/eid1702.101020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.CDC (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2022. Blastomycosis. Last reviewed 9 February 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/blastomycosis/index.html [accessed 12 September 2023].