Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1994 Aug;48(4):400–405. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.4.400

Birth outcomes by level of obstetric care in Finland: a catchment area based analysis.

K Viisainen 1, M Gissler 1, E Hemminki 1
PMCID: PMC1059991  PMID: 7964341

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--To study whether hospitals of different levels are equally safe places to give birth in a regionalised system of care. DESIGN--This was a population based, cross sectional survey comparing birth outcomes in nationwide catchment areas of different levels of hospital care. All women and low risk women were examined separately. SETTING AND SUBJECTS--The study population comprised all women who gave birth in Finland in 1987-88. The data were obtained from the Finnish Medical Registry, complemented by official data. MAIN RESULTS--No statistically significant differences were found in crude or birthweight specific perinatal mortality rates between the catchment areas, nor did the other outcomes studied favour tertiary care compared with other levels of care in the area based analysis. CONCLUSIONS--In a regionalised system of birth care with a proper referral system, small local hospitals are as safe places to give birth as tertiary care hospitals.

Full text

PDF
400

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albers L. L., Savitz D. A. Hospital setting for birth and use of medical procedures in low-risk women. J Nurse Midwifery. 1991 Nov-Dec;36(6):327–333. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(91)90104-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg C. J., Druschel C. M., McCarthy B. J., LaVoie M., Floyd R. L. Neonatal mortality in normal birth weight babies: does the level of hospital care make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jul;161(1):86–91. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90239-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell R., MacFarlane A. Place of delivery: a review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jul;93(7):675–683. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eksmyr R. Two geographically defined populations with different organization of medical care. Cause-specific analysis of early neonatal deaths. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1986 Jan;75(1):10–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1986.tb10150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fallis G., Dunn E., Hilditch J. Small hospital obstetrics: is small beautiful? J Rural Health. 1988 Jul;4(2):101–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1988.tb00316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gortmaker S., Sobol A., Clark C., Walker D. K., Geronimus A. The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: a population study of perinatal systems in four states. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jul 1;152(5):517–524. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90618-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hemminki E., Malin M., Kojo-Austin H. Prenatal care in Finland: from primary to tertiary health care? Int J Health Serv. 1990;20(2):221–232. doi: 10.2190/P7F1-PD9B-Y1XA-D9YQ. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hemminki E., Meriläinen J., Malin M., Rahkonen O., Teperi J. Mother's education and perinatal problems in Finland. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Aug;21(4):720–724. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.4.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hemminki E. Obstetric practice in Finland, 1950-1980. Changes in technology and its relation to health. Med Care. 1983 Dec;21(12):1131–1143. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198312000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hemminki E. Perinatal mortality distributed by type of hospital in the Central Hospital District of Helsinki, Finland. Scand J Soc Med. 1985;13(3):113–118. doi: 10.1177/140349488501300308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hemminki E., Teperi J., Tuominen K. Need for and influence of feedback from the Finnish birth register to data providers. Qual Assur Health Care. 1992 Jun;4(2):133–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lumley J. The safety of small maternity hospitals in Victoria 1982-84. Community Health Stud. 1988;12(4):386–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1988.tb00604.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paneth N., Kiely J. L., Wallenstein S., Marcus M., Pakter J., Susser M. Newborn intensive care and neonatal mortality in low-birth-weight infants: a population study. N Engl J Med. 1982 Jul 15;307(3):149–155. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198207153070303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenblatt R. A., Reinken J., Shoemack P. Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system. Lancet. 1985 Aug 24;2(8452):429–432. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92747-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Teperi J. Multi method approach to the assessment of data quality in the Finnish Medical Birth Registry. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Jun;47(3):242–247. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.3.242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Treffers P. E., Laan R. Regional perinatal mortality and regional hospitalization at delivery in The Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jul;93(7):690–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES