Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE--To assess the impact of a breast clinic on a specific target population and evaluate early diagnosis performance indicators for breast cancer in the presence of a self referral policy. DESIGN--Women living in Florence between 1980 and 1989 who had undergone mammography at a self referral breast clinic were studied. Main outcome measures were the use of mammography in relation to age, symptoms, and the interval between two subsequent tests, and early diagnosis performance indicators were the detection rate (DR), the prevalence/incidence ratio, and the proportion of early detected cancers. Performance indicators were compared with those from formal screening programmes. SETTING--Florence, Italy. PATIENTS--All mammograms performed at the clinic from 1980-89 in 40-69 year old women living in Florence were examined (n = 42,226). Records included the date of birth and of the examination, the reason for testing (asymptomatic/presence of pain/presence of symptoms other than pain), and the TNM classification for breast cancer cases. MAIN RESULTS--The total number of mammograms performed per annum increased by 70% over the decade, but much of this was routine repeat mammography (54.1% in 1989). Rates of first examinations in asymptomatic women increased in the second half of the decade from 17 per 1000 in 1985 to 31 per 1000 in 1989. Mammographic coverage decreased with increasing age from 12.6% in 40-49 year olds to 6.0% in 60-69 years old. Performance indicators of the activity in asymptomatic women were comparable with those expected in service screening. The proportion of not advanced cancers detected in asymptomatic women was 62.3% with a DR of 5.3 per 1000, and the average prevalence/incidence ratio was 2.9. CONCLUSIONS--High quality mammography performed in a breast clinic in self referred asymptomatic women can achieve as good results as a formal invitation screening service. Only a few of these women will benefit, but those who do are likely to be younger (40-49 year old women).
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Biggeri A., Del Turco M. R., Toscani L., Ciatto S., Bianchi S. Incidenza del tumore della mammella femminile in provincia di Firenze dal 1977 al 1982. Epidemiol Prev. 1988 Mar;10(34):26–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day N. E., Williams D. R., Khaw K. T. Breast cancer screening programmes: the development of a monitoring and evaluation system. Br J Cancer. 1989 Jun;59(6):954–958. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferro S., Caroli A., Nanni O., Biggeri A., Gambi A. A cross sectional survey on breast self examination practice, utilization of breast professional examination, mammography and associated factors in Romagna, Italy. Tumori. 1992 Apr 30;78(2):98–105. doi: 10.1177/030089169207800207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris J. R., Lippman M. E., Veronesi U., Willett W. Breast cancer (1) N Engl J Med. 1992 Jul 30;327(5):319–328. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199207303270505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howard J. Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential. CA Cancer J Clin. 1987 Jan-Feb;37(1):33–48. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.37.1.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paci E., Ciatto S., Buiatti E., Cecchini S., Palli D., Rosselli del Turco M. Early indicators of efficacy of breast cancer screening programmes. Results of the Florence District Programme. Int J Cancer. 1990 Aug 15;46(2):198–202. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910460209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paci E., Duffy S. W. Modelling the analysis of breast cancer screening programmes: sensitivity, lead time and predictive value in the Florence District Programme (1975-1986). Int J Epidemiol. 1991 Dec;20(4):852–858. doi: 10.1093/ije/20.4.852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palli D., Rosselli del Turco M., Buiatti E., Ciatto S., Crocetti E., Paci E. Time interval since last test in a breast cancer screening programme: a case-control study in Italy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Sep;43(3):241–248. doi: 10.1136/jech.43.3.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tabár L., Faberberg G., Day N. E., Holmberg L. What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. Br J Cancer. 1987 May;55(5):547–551. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tabár L., Fagerberg G., Day N. E., Duffy S. W., Kitchin R. M. Breast cancer treatment and natural history: new insights from results of screening. Lancet. 1992 Feb 15;339(8790):412–414. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90090-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verbeek A. L., Van den Ban M. C., Hendriks J. H. A proposal for short-term quality control in breast cancer screening. Br J Cancer. 1991 Feb;63(2):261–264. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1991.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]