Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1994 Dec;48(6):590–595. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.6.590

Geographical variation in hospital admission rates: an analysis of workload in the Oxford region, England.

J N Newton 1, V Seagroatt 1, M Goldacre 1
PMCID: PMC1060038  PMID: 7830015

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To measure variation in hospital admission rates between health districts in part of the English NHS, comparing a wide range of medical and surgical conditions. DESIGN--Retrospective analysis of interdistrict variation using linked routine hospital admission data. Comparisons were also made with levels of variation reported from the USA. SETTING--Oxford Regional Health Authority, 1979-86. SUBJECTS--Six district health authorities--total study population 2.1 million people, 1.6 million hospital admissions. MAIN MEASURES--Age and sex standardised hospital admission rates for resident populations for individual operations and diagnoses; systematic components of variation (SCV). RESULTS--Of 118 standard operation groups, 38 (26% of surgical workload) showed high variation (SCV 16 or more) and 40 (36% of surgical workload) showed low variation (SCV < 4). Operations (SCV) with very low levels of variation included prostatectomy (0.1), inguinal herniorraphy (0.9), and cholecystectomy (1.3). Rates were more variable for myringotomy (3.7), hysterectomy (4.3), dilatation and curettage (5.6), and tonsillectomy (6.2). The SCV was high for only four of the 40 commonest medical causes of admission, and was low for 18 of them. CONCLUSIONS--Most admissions in the Oxford region were for conditions that did not show a great deal of variation in admission rates. The level of variation for many surgical procedures was less than that reported in studies from the USA. Variation was no greater for medical causes of admission than for surgical conditions. Large scale variation may not be an inevitable consequence of autonomous clinical practice.

Full text

PDF
590

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Black N. Geographical variations in use of surgery for glue ear. J R Soc Med. 1985 Aug;78(8):641–648. doi: 10.1177/014107688507800809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bunker J. P. Variations in hospital admissions and the appropriateness of care: American preoccupations? BMJ. 1990 Sep 15;301(6751):531–532. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6751.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crombie D. L., Cross K. W., Fleming D. M. The problem of diagnostic variability in general practice. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Aug;46(4):447–454. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.4.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frankel S. The epidemiology of indications. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Dec;45(4):257–259. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.4.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Glover J. A. The Incidence of Tonsillectomy in School Children: (Section of Epidemiology and State Medicine). Proc R Soc Med. 1938 Aug;31(10):1219–1236. doi: 10.1177/003591573803101027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LoGerfo J. P. Organizational and financial influences on patterns of surgical care. Surg Clin North Am. 1982 Aug;62(4):677–684. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)42787-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lord P. H. A day-case procedure for the cure of third-degree haemorrhoids. Br J Surg. 1969 Oct;56(10):747–749. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800561013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McPherson K., Strong P. M., Epstein A., Jones L. Regional variations in the use of common surgical procedures: within and between England and Wales, Canada and the United States of America. Soc Sci Med A. 1981 May;15(3 Pt 1):273–288. doi: 10.1016/0271-7123(81)90011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McPherson K., Wennberg J. E., Hovind O. B., Clifford P. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310–1314. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Moore A. T., Roland M. O. How much variation in referral rates among general practitioners is due to chance? BMJ. 1989 Feb 25;298(6672):500–502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6672.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Moore F. D. Small area variations studies: illuminating or misleading? Health Aff (Millwood) 1985 Spring;4(1):96–101. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.4.1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Newton J., Goldacre M. Multiple hospital admissions in a calendar year. J Public Health Med. 1993 Sep;15(3):249–254. doi: 10.1007/BF02959668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Paul-Shaheen P., Clark J. D., Williams D. Small area analysis: a review and analysis of the North American literature. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1987 Winter;12(4):741–809. doi: 10.1215/03616878-12-4-741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pearson R. J., Smedby B., Berfenstam R., Logan R. F., Burgess A. M., Jr, Peterson O. L. Hospital caseloads in Liverpool, New England, and Uppsala. An international comparison. Lancet. 1968 Sep 7;2(7567):559–566. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92423-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Price C. E., Paul E. A., Bevan R. G., Holland W. W. Equity and medical practice variation: relationships between standardised discharge ratios in total and for selected conditions in English districts. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Feb;46(1):58–62. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.1.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wennberg J. E., Barnes B. A., Zubkoff M. Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(7):811–824. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90234-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wennberg J. E., McPherson K., Caper P. Will payment based on diagnosis-related groups control hospital costs? N Engl J Med. 1984 Aug 2;311(5):295–300. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198408023110505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wennberg J. E. Outcomes research, cost containment, and the fear of health care rationing. N Engl J Med. 1990 Oct 25;323(17):1202–1204. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199010253231710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wennberg J. E. Population illness rates do not explain population hospitalization rates. A comment on Mark Blumberg's thesis that morbidity adjusters are needed to interpret small area variations. Med Care. 1987 Apr;25(4):354–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES