Abstract
Adrenal adenomas are observed in up to 7% of the population and are predominantly non-functional, increased 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake is seen in only a small portion of them on 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging. In this report, we present the sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging findings of 2 patients with radiologically or pathologically confirmed adrenal adenomas who had severely altered 18F-FDG uptake patterns in adrenal lesions in different imaging studies of the same patient. In light of these findings, we wanted to highlight that evaluating adrenal adenomas as cross-sectional with semi-quantitative PET/CT parameters obtained from single imaging may cause misinterpretation.
Keywords: Adrenal adenoma, 18F-FDG, positron emission tomography
Abstract
Adrenal adenomlar popülasyonun yaklaşık %7’sine kadar gözlenir ve ağırlıklı olarak fonksiyon göstermemektedir. 18F-florodeoksiglukoz (FDG) pozitron emisyon tomografisi/bilgisayarlı tomografi (PET/BT) görüntülemede bunların sadece küçük bir bölümünde artmış 18F-FDG tutulumu gözlenmektedir. Bu raporda, adrenal lezyonlarda 18F-FDG tutulum paternlerini belirgin şekilde değiştiren radyolojik veya patolojik olarak doğrulanmış adrenal adenomu olan 2 hastanın ardışık 18F-FDG PET/BT görüntüleme bulgularını sunuyoruz. Bu bulgular ışığında adrenal adenomların tek görüntülemeden elde edilen semi-kantitatif PET/BT parametreleri ile kesitsel olarak değerlendirilmesinin yanlış yorumlamalara yol açabileceğini vurgulamak istedik.
Figure 1.

A 40-year-old patient presented with abdominal pain and was diagnosed with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Staging 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images (A, B, C) revealed intra-abdominal hypermetabolic gross mass lesions as well as a well-defined nodular lesion with moderate 18F-FDG uptake in the left adrenal gland [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax): 4.6 g/mL]. On the subsequent 18F-FDG PET/CT images (D, E, F) taken after 4 months of imatinib treatment, metabolic regression as well as significant necrotic hypometabolic findings were observed in the abdominopelvic mass lesions. However, it was noted that intense 18F-FDG uptake developed in the left adrenal nodular lesion without significant morphological changes (SUVmax: 12.8 g/mL). Left adrenal tru-cut biopsy was performed because of the relatively rare occurrence of adrenal metastasis in GIST cases and suspicious findings observed during the course of the disease, and it was reported to be consistent with adrenal cortical adenoma without any further features. Figure
Figure 2.

18F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed on a 51-year-old patient who was diagnosed with anaplastic thyroid cancer from a nodule found in the left lobe of the thyroid gland. On the axial PET, CT, and fused PET/CT images obtained (A, B, C), a nodular lesion with increased 18F-FDG uptake was observed in the left adrenal gland, except for lung, liver, and bone metastases (SUVmax: 5.8 g/mL). Although progression was detected in metastatic foci in 18F-FDG PET/CT images (D, E, F) taken after chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) regimen, it was noted that the metabolic activity of the morphologically stable left adrenal nodular lesion regressed (SUVmax: 3.7 g/mL). On magnetic resonance imaging, the lesion was reported to be compatible with adrenal adenoma. Increased 18F-FDG uptake is observed in only 5% of adrenal adenomas, which is common in oncologic imaging practice (1). In the literature, the effectiveness of semi-quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters, primarily SUVmax, in differentiating adrenal lesions as benign or malignant at different threshold values has been evaluated with various reports (2,3,4,5). Although there are several descriptions regarding the alterations in 18F-FDG uptake patterns observed in adrenal adenomas, especially possible circadian rhythm of the hormone-secreting tissues, as well as the differences in the cell content of the lesions (especially cell content with increased GLUT1 expression), information on this issue is still limited (6,7,8). Considering the variability of 18F-FDG uptake of adrenal adenomas as we presented in our cases and possible differences in clinical-technical characteristics between scans (serum glucose level, fasting period, injection time, and time between imaging and injection), we wanted to highlight the limitations in cross-sectional evaluation of adrenal lesions with a single PET/CT imaging.
Footnotes
Ethics
Informed Consent: Patient consent was obtained.
Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.
Authorship Contributions
Surgical and Medical Practices: F.T., Ü.Y., Concept: F.T., Ü.Y., Design: F.T., Ü.Y., Data Collection or Processing: F.T., Ü.Y., Analysis or Interpretation: F.T., Ü.Y., Literature Search: F.T., Ü.Y., Writing: F.T., Ü.Y.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declare by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.
References
- 1.Chong S, Lee KS, Kim HY, Kim YK, Kim BT, Chung MJ, Yi CA, Kwon GY. Integrated PET-CT for the characterization of adrenal gland lesions in cancer patients: diagnostic efficacy and interpretation pitfalls. Radiographics. 2006;26:1811–1824. doi: 10.1148/rg.266065057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ansquer C, Scigliano S, Mirallié E, Taïeb D, Brunaud L, Sebag F, Leux C, Drui D, Dupas B, Renaudin K, Kraeber-Bodéré F. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the characterization and surgical decision concerning adrenal masses: a prospective multicentre evaluation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:1669–1678. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1471-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boland GW, Dwamena BA, Jagtiani Sangwaiya M, Goehler AG, Blake MA, Hahn PF, Scott JA, Kalra MK. Characterization of adrenal masses by using FDG PET: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. Radiology. 2011;259:117–126. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11100569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kim SJ, Lee SW, Pak K, Kim IJ, Kim K. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the characterization of adrenal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170520. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.He X, Caoili EM, Avram AM, Miller BS, Else T. 18F-FDG-PET/CT Evaluation of Indeterminate Adrenal Masses in Noncancer Patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106:1448–1459. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takanami K, Kaneta T, Morimoto R, Satoh F, Nakamura Y, Takase K, Takahashi S. Characterization of lipid-rich adrenal tumors by FDG PET/CT: Are they hormone-secreting or not? Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:145–153. doi: 10.1007/s12149-013-0793-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lang BH, Cowling BJ, Li JY, Wong KP, Wan KY. High False Positivity in Positron Emission Tomography is a Potential Diagnostic Pitfall in Patients with Suspected Adrenal Metastasis. World J Surg. 2015;39:1902–1908. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3035-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Murayama R, Nishie A, Hida T, Baba S, Inokuchi J, Oda Y, Honda H. Uptake of 18F-FDG in Adrenal Adenomas Is Associated With Unenhanced CT Value and Constituent Cells. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44:943–948. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
